Aaron Levy discusses how to encourage your team to give and receive more honest feedback.
You’ll Learn:
- The deciding factor of high-performing teams
- How to make feedback less intimidating
- Four ground rules that allow teams to thrive
About Aaron:
Aaron is the Founder and CEO of Raise The Bar, a firm focused on helping companies address the problem of millennial turnover.
Aaron is an ICF Associate Certified Coach, a Thrive Global contributor, an 1871 mentor, the Co-Director of Startup Grind Chicago and a member of the Forbes Coaches Council. He has educated, coached, and consulted over 5,500 business leaders, helping them to define goals, create action plans, and achieve sustained success.
Aaron is on a mission to transform the manager role â by empowering each manager with the tools, skills, and training to be leaders of people who unlock the potential of their team.
- Aaronâs book:Â Open, Honest, and Direct: A Guide to Unlocking Your Teamâs Potential
- Aaronâs LinkedIn:Â Aaron Levy
- Aaronâs website:Â RaiseBar.co
- Book site:Â OpenHonestandDirect.com
Resources mentioned in the show:
- App:Â Loom
- App:Â Google Tasks
- Study:Â Googleâs Project Aristotle
- Study:Â Bloomerâs experiment
- Study:Â The Pratfall Effect
- Book: Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life by Marshall Rosenberg
- Book: Traction: Get a Grip on Your Business by Gino Wickman
- Book: Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success by Adam Grant
- Movie:Â Stand and Deliver
- Sketch:Â Key & Peele text message confusion (NSFW)
- Previous episode:Â 388: How to Not Suck at Managing with Aaron Levy
Aaron Levy Interview Transcript
Pete Mockaitis
Aaron, welcome back to the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.
Aaron Levy
Thanks for having me on for a second time, Pete. Iâm really happy to be here.
Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes. Well, Iâm happy to have you. And another fun fact we learned about you is you take some cold-water plunges in the wintertime. What is the story here?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, itâs been the last couple of years. My coach for his 60th birthday said, âFor my birthday, youâre going to come plunge with me in the lake.â And I swim with him probably May through August, September, early October. He said, âWeâre going to go for a plunge in November-December.â I said, âWhat?â He said, âItâs for my birthday.â I said, âOkay. You only turn 60 once so weâll do it.â
And we got in, and we plunged, and it became one of those things that is thereâs not really much better way to start the day than plunging into Lake Michigan and getting this just cold but also really refreshing feeling. So, I try and do it a couple of times a week and go in for a couple of minutes so I donât get hypothermic, and itâs just a really nice refreshing way to start the day.
Pete Mockaitis
You know, itâs funny you used the word nice because it sounds like torture to me. Explain.
Aaron Levy
Well, it is a little bit painful and itâs a mental challenge, and I think that, also, whatâs interesting about it, as someone who does triathlons and racing, that whole sport is a mental challenge, and so you kind of love once you get into the water, itâs all leading up to it, but then once youâre in and youâre shoulder deep in water, everything slows down, and you can slow down your heart rate and your breathing. You just calm down. And you donât want too calm in there for too long but you definitely calm down for a minute or two. Itâs the leadup thatâs much more crazy, I think, than the actual plunge.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I was going to say, are you sure that sensation isnât you dying?
Aaron Levy
No, Iâm not entirely sure itâs not me dying. Weâve done it enough times where weâd play with that, like, âOkay, at two and a half minutes at this temperature, thatâs too much time.â Like, your whole body chatters for 30 minutes afterwards, âOkay, I was in there a little too long.â So, we learned to figure that out on our own.
But itâs just one of those things thatâs really refreshing. And people ask me, âWell, whatâs the science behind it?â And I say, âYou know, the science is hit and miss. Thereâs cryotherapy, professional athletes going in ice baths after sporting events or races, and so itâs kind of following along that path. Itâs very similar to that, but Iâm not going to claim I do this for science. The reason I do it because itâs exhilarating, itâs fun, and itâs refreshing.â
Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, thatâs intriguing and itâs come up before, so thanks for indulging us there. I want to say congrats. You have completed your book Open, Honest, and Direct: A Guide to Unlocking Your Teams Potential, so thatâs cool. I think I want to go deep on a particular vein of it, but maybe you could give us sort of like the broad zoomed-out message, sort of whatâs the main thesis of this opus here.
Aaron Levy
Yeah, the main thesis is that it takes work to lead people, and we are usually promoted into leadership roles because weâre good at doing what weâre doing, not because weâre good at leading people. And so, the path that this book takes is actually it takes all the steps we work with leaders on, is, âWhat does it take to be an open, honest, and direct leader? How do you listen? How do you ask powerful questions? How do you create this base for psychological safety to occur? And how do you ultimately realizeâŚ?â
I think one of the hardest messages of the book to realize is that feedback is a gift, and the act of giving it, even in a critical conversation, or sharing something that just might not feel good to share because you might be worried about hurting somebody elseâs feelings, actually might be the best thing that that person needs or you and your team need, or all of the above need.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, boy, thereâs lots to that and it certainly resonates and rings true. So, I want to talk in-depth about psychological safety, which is a theme thatâs in the book and in your work. And so, first, how about, just so weâre all on the same page, can you define that term for us and why does it matter?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, the way I think about it when we think about psychological safety is itâs the belief that you wonât be punished or humiliated for speaking up, raising questions, concerns, or mistakes.
Pete Mockaitis
All right.
Aaron Levy
I can give you more of an analogy though if that helps as another way to think about it.
Pete Mockaitis
Oh, weâll take it.
Aaron Levy
So, the way I tend to think about it is imagine youâre walking through, you know, youâre trying to not be sure who you can say what to. Like, this person, if you say that to, they might blow up at you. This person you say that to, theyâre going to respond to it in a different way. This person is going to be passive-aggressive, and itâs like youâre walking through a field where thereâs a series of landmines all around you and youâre not quite sure where those landmines are.
And so, youâre walking through the field slowly, unsure of what you say, and if you do it the wrong way, or if you say it with this tone, or if you email it in that way, that youâre going to get punished, or humiliated, or put down. And itâs just not hyper-efficient. Itâs actually the opposite of efficiency because youâre slowly walking through that field as opposed to, in business, what we really want to be doing is moving at a rapid pace together towards the same direction.
And so, the lack of psychological safety is like youâre walking through a series of landmines.
Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, that is a nice, well, maybe not nice, itâs a clear and illustrative metaphor, maybe kind of a spooky one as you really put yourself in the position. And so, I hear you that the belief that youâre not going to be ridiculed, etc., that sounds like a pleasant thing to be going on. But thereâs really some excellent science behind psychological safety and the results that that unlocks for teams. So, can you refresh us on that as well?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, I think the most interesting thing about this came when I started to look at Googleâs Project Aristotle. And when you look at Googleâs Project Aristotle, itâs really a study where Google said, âHey, we want to figure out what are the key ingredients for a high-performing team, what makes teams perform well.â
And their initial hypothesis was, âWell, itâs the right mix of people with this personality style and that personality style. We have the right mix of introverts and extroverts. We have the right mix of talent.â They thought that was the case. But when they did their research and they looked at teams within Google, but they also looked at meta analyses of other studies on teams, what they found was their hypothesis was totally wrong.
And two of the most important factors to drive high-performing teams had nothing to do with the people on the teams at all. Initially, I was baffled, and then after I had a chance to kind of absorb that and think about that concept, the performance of a team has nothing to do with the people on the team at all. The cool thing about that is that means that you, as a leader of a team, actually have the opportunity to impact the performance of any team that youâre working on immediately.
And the two factors that show up and came out of this Google Project Aristotle was the need for psychological safety in the workplace and also clarity. Both of those things combined, âClarity on where weâre going, how weâre working together, and safety, and I feel comfortable in my ability to do what I need to do to work.â And that might mean asking a question without thinking itâs a stupid question, that might mean challenging my boss because we need to challenge his idea and not just accept the norms. Thatâs actually what drives team performance.
So, itâs not really a thing that we talk about in our leadership training, or with our clients, or in any of our work as a way to just feel good. The reason we talk about psychological safety is because it is one of the top factors which drives team performance and better outcomes within a business.
Pete Mockaitis
Boy, itâs really interesting how I can really think about all kinds of conversations where thereâs really some interrelationship there, which means psychological safety and clarity, because you might be afraid youâre going to be ridiculed and, thusly, you donât ask the clarifying questions necessary to arrive at your clarity. And, in reverse, itâs like if you donât feel clear about where youâre going, youâre feeling kind of anxious and edgy, like, âI hope this is maybe the right thing,â like the whole time that youâre engaging in conversation and hunker down and doing your work solo.
Aaron Levy
The balance and the play between the two are so, so important. And I say any great leader, their role is to provide context and clarity. Clarity on where weâre going, what weâre doing, how weâre going. And context as to why weâre doing it. But the underlying thing in that is, all along that way, people need to feel safe.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, so then letâs get into it. The psychological safety, how is it earned and gained and built? And how is it lost in terms of sort of real-life day-to-day exchanges, interactions?
Aaron Levy
Yeah. At the highest level, it is gained and lost through consistency. So, if you are not consistent in the way you show up, Pete, as a person with your family, with other people, they wonât know what to expect from you and, thus, psychological safety is lost. However, if youâre consistent in the way you show up, you are setting yourself up to say, âI know if I do this, Iâm going to get this response.â
So, what youâre doing is youâre setting yourself up for psychological safety. It doesnât mean that youâre going to guarantee youâd give it if youâre consistently yelling at people when they ask you a question. Thatâs not psychological safety, but itâs consistency in a few things. And so, I share consistency at the start because thatâs probably the most important thing to remember. Itâs not, âI just try, Iâm going to share a couple of things that we talk about doing.â But itâs not trying to do one of those things or two of those things once in a while and seeing how it works. Psychological safety is created over a long period of time where youâre consistent in the actions that you do.
And so, one specific example of that is when you give feedback in person, right? And when I say in person, I donât mean literally it has to be face-to-face with the other person. It could be over the phone or via a video chat. What I really mean is not giving feedback via Slack, via Instant Message, or text message, or email because itâs just not the highest fidelity mode of communication.
The best example I think about is, itâs like if you ever have that text message where youâre texting with somebody, and then you feel like they might be frustrated, and the text bubble comes up, and it seems like theyâre about to text too but then it goes away?
Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah.
Aaron Levy
And thatâs the worst. âWhatâs happening is? Is he mad at me?â and then you go into the office and itâs your boss. So, youâre looking for your boss, and he walks in, and he walks right by you, youâre like, âWait. Heâs definitely mad at me. Iâm in trouble. I did something wrong. I mustâve said something wrong in his email. Whatâs going on?â You build this whole story.
Little did you know, as youâre building that whole story, is youâre reading this feedback via text message, which isnât a high-fidelity mode of communication, youâre building a story that he or she is mad at you for something that happened in the text message. But, really, they were just going from one meeting to another, and in between meetings, they really had to go to the bathroom, so they donât even see you. They just walk straight to the bathroom.
And when we donât give feedback in person, over the phone, or via a video chat, weâre losing that level of understanding the situation and we build a story around it.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, this reminds me. This has come up once before on the show. If youâve seen the Key & Peele text message confusion sketch, it is priceless. Itâs not quite safe at work because of the language, but itâs hilarious and illustrates that point, how we can sort of read things in and misinterpret, and when folks truly have completely different intentions and things that theyâre trying to communicate there. Okay, thatâs one practice then, is offering feedback in a live, real-time environment.
Aaron Levy
Hereâs the tip around that, too.
Pete Mockaitis
All right.
Aaron Levy
If an email or a text message is taking you more than five minutes to craft, like youâre typing it and then you delete because youâre like, âOh, that sound passive-aggressive.â Typing it in again, deleting, youâre not really sure how to respond? Donât send the email. Itâs called the 5-minute rule. Just pick up the phone and call the person, or walk over their desk.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And what I love about that, I guess the nuance to that 5-minute rule is itâs not so much you have a lot of content to share. I guess if thatâs the case, Iâd recommend Loom. I love that screen recording stuff. They need to sponsor the show one day. Anyway, I love Loom for screen recording instant videos, so sharp. But itâs taking you more than five minutes not because thereâs a lot of in-depth content but because thereâs some emotional stuff there, âOoh, I donât know if thatâs going to land this way. Hmm.â Like, those are the things that are making it get stretched out.
Aaron Levy
And that emotional stuff isnât going to be conveyed well via email.
Pete Mockaitis
Right.
Aaron Levy
So, donât.
Pete Mockaitis
Iâm with you. Iâm with you. Okay, so we got the sharing. Thatâs one consistent action you recommend for building the psychological safety is sharing those feedback points in real-time live environments, in person or in Skype or something, or phone. What are some of the other key consistent things that make all the difference in building up psychological safety?
Aaron Levy
Avoid using absolutes like âalways,â ânever,â âcanât,â âwonât,â âdonât.â The truth is when you use absolutes like that, it just adds a layer of judgment to a situation that likely isnât true and will most often lead to someone else being defensive on the good side or the bad side, âPete, youâre always late.â You might look at me and say, âAaron, I wasnât late for this meeting and I wasnât late for last meeting.â And Iâd have to say, âOh, youâre right. Pete, three meetings this week that youâre a part of, you were late.â That you canât deny, but always late? Thatâs just probably not true.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, Iâm right with you there. And so, itâs also a bit more honest. Iâm thinking about the book Nonviolent Communication now.
Aaron Levy
Oh, amazing book.
Pete Mockaitis
In terms of just itâs an observation as opposed to judgment, and thereâs a huge distinction and ways that you can sort of drift on over into the judgment territory and be evaluative in use of one of those absolutes. Itâs so funny, itâs tempting to use an absolute about absolutes, âNever use absolutes.â Oh, no, I just used an absolute.
Aaron Levy
I was about to say every time. Most of the time when I deliver this and share this with leaders, in my head Iâm having this dialogue of, âWatch out for the absolutes, watch out for the absolutes. Theyâre going to catch you in an absolute.â Because itâs such a big part of our language and the way in which we communicate, we communicate through themes and stories that we see on TV and in the world, and we communicate through absolutes. And both of those actually limit the truth of what weâre trying to say.
Pete Mockaitis
I love it. Well, keep it coming. Keep it coming, Aaron. What else, career practices?
Aaron Levy
What else? One of my favorites is simply be specific. Share what actions worked or didnât work when youâre giving someone feedback. So, donât share who they are or who they arenât, right? âYou need to care more.â âWhat do you mean I need to care more? What tells you that Iâm not caring enough?â And when we break this down with leaders as they start to share this in our trainings, and they say, âWell, what tells me that they donât care is the last email that they sent to a client had three spelling errors in it.â Okay. So, instead of telling your employee to care more, which has a lot of judgment, has a lot of weight, just tell them that what you expect of them is to send client emails without grammatical errors in it.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that because, well, one itâs just very specific and actionable, and you can run with that and be enriched as a professional by hearing and adapting to that feedback. I would love to get your pro take on it in terms of do you want to share the context associated with the why behind that? Because, in a way, that might sound evaluative and judge-y.
So, I would say, âHey, please make sure that you double-check your email so that you donât have these sorts of typos go out. I noticed in this email these three typos. And my concern is that can create the impression that we are sloppy, or inattentive to detail, or rushing over on our side.â So, in a way, Iâm giving you some context and some why behind my request. In another way, it sounds like I might be into evaluation, judging territory that they might trigger defensiveness. Whatâs your take?
Aaron Levy
âWell, so you did it twice unknowingly, so Iâm going to give you a little bit of a reframe, take it or leave it. One of the things that you did, even at the start without noticing likely, was I want you to double-check your emails.â Thatâs assuming that whoever sent that email didnât double or triple, quadruple-check it. Iâm someone who can triple-check an email and still have plenty of grammatical errors in it. And so, I could look at that and hear what you say just from the start, and be like, âWell, I did.â
So, hereâs a reframe of how to say it, âThe expectation is, when you have a client email that goes out, it has zero grammatical errors. The impact of having grammatical errors is they think small errors means we have errors in other things that we do and it decreases our chance of working with them again.â
So, your ask was, âHey, can I share this specific feedback and can I give a little bit of the impact of this specific impact?â Yes, you can totally give the impact of this specific feedback. I would just make it as insular as possible. What I mean by that is, as you and the experience focus, as opposed to saying, âWhen you do that, everybody on the team gets pissed at you.â
Pete Mockaitis
Right.
Aaron Levy
âWhen you send that email, the impact is I donât trust that youâre going to do what you say youâre going to do,â right? That is my judgment and evaluation, but, hey, I asked you to do something and send an email on time or send an email with no errors, and you sent an email late with errors. Now, I donât trust that you can do what you say youâre going to do, as opposed to the rest of the team was pissed off at you. Because that is throwing too much judgment out there to the group.
And I know this sounds like nitty-gritty if youâre listening to it. As much as you can think of, âHow can I just be specific about what actually didnât work and the honest impact of it?â The honest impact is, âWeâre worried that we might lose a client when we send them work like this.â
Pete Mockaitis
Right. Yeah, I like that in terms of itâs clear, itâs like, âThis is the expectation for these underlying reasons or philosophies,â and then it gets more personal in terms of, letâs take a look at this example email, and letâs hear that part of the conversation.
Aaron Levy
Yeah. And so, sometimes with feedback, you donât need to give the impact because they get it. itâs just especially when you do it in the moment or timely. It doesnât need to be spur of the moment but it should be within one to three days. Thatâs one of the other things thatâs really important. If you give feedback a week, two, three, six weeks, a month later, the person might not even remember what it was about, âWhat email are you talking about? What did I say in that client call? What did I do in that meeting? I didnât even notice.â
When you give it in the moment, or within a couple of days, people are able to observe, understand what they did, and change it. So, if someone on your team is a salesperson, and they made a mistake in a sales call, and you wait two weeks to tell them about the mistake, how many sales calls are they going on making the same mistake over and over and over again?
Pete Mockaitis
Absolutely, and it just doesnât feel so great. Iâm thinking about reviews in particular. Itâs like surprises on the review that might happen nearly a year after the fact, itâs like, âWhat?â
Aaron Levy
Hereâs the analogy I play with that just because itâs almost stupid-funny when you think about it. Think about Tom Brady and the Patriots, and I say Tom Brady not because I like Tom Brady but because heâs one of the more recognizable football players, athletes in the world. So, he gets into the huddle, thereâs two minutes left in the game, and heâs getting the play calls into his helmet from his coach, and heâs talking to his teammates, and heâs hearing whatâs going on, and he lets them know the play, and they all break and they spread out into the field, and he sees the defense, and theyâre moving around, and his offense is looking at him.
And then he sees this wide receiver, and heâs not in the right spot. And he looks at him, he goes, âOh, I donât know. Should I? Well, weâre going to have a review of the game on Monday. Maybe Iâll tell him to move over on Monday. You know what, weâre almost at the end of the season, weâre going to do our annual reviews at the end of the season, so Iâll tell him that heâs not in the right, or I could just send him an email, too.â We would think thatâs ridiculous. That just doesnât happen. Tom looks at the guy, and he says, âMove over!â He might even say, âMoveâŚâ insert swear word ââŚover!â And the receiver doesnât think twice of it, he needed to know how to be in the right spot so that they could move forward towards a common goal together efficiently and effectively.
Yet, in the workplace, we do that. In the workplace, we say, âOh, I donât know. Maybe Iâll just send him an email. Well, I waited too long to send that email, so Iâll tell him when he have a debrief on this client. Well, I didnât do it then because we didnât have time, so Iâll just do it at the annual performance review.â Thatâs not helping anybody grow. Thatâs not being consistent. And so, one of the really important things is actually just to be timely when you give feedback so they know when to expect it.
On our team, one of the things we do is we have a feedback debrief in between each workshop that we do. I actually have to send one out to the group on the last workshop that I did yesterday and the day before to say, âHereâs what worked. Hereâs what didnât.â If I only sent an email out when things were going really well, or when things were really bad, then people would be afraid when they got an email from me, and theyâd say, âOh, no. Is thisâŚwhat did we do wrong?â But the consistency is each session that we have, each week that we do it, people will know, âHereâs the email. You know to expect something that worked, something that didnât work.â
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I think thatâs huge and powerful. And Iâm thinking about this football analogy in terms of, yeah, youâre right, that would be ridiculous to think about giving feedback in that way. I guess Iâm also thinking about my experience of when Iâm working with sort of creative types, like, âHey, weâre making a logo, or weâre doing whatever,â I find it so interesting is when I share feedback in terms of, âYou know what, that white space, it just seems like itâs so tight, itâs kind of uncomfortable, whatever.â
And itâs funny because sometimes I think that I sound kind of weird talking about design-type things, or art-type things, or I was talking to my audio people, itâs like, âI think my voice sounds a little robot-y at times. I donât know if itâs being processed in a certain way.â And so, they appreciate it, like, âOh, thatâs great. Thank you. Yeah, Iâm really going to dig into that.â
And so, as opposed to I guess that itâs just rare that I work with someone in my kind of creative capacity and they get really defensive or angry or irritated, like, âHow dare you? You donât sound robot-y. We mastered your voice perfectly,â or, âYou donât know jack about logos. What I made is excellent.â What do you think thatâs about in terms of the mindset if itâs a football player or a logo designer versus an office professional? And why sort of feedback is often not given the same way and often not received the same way?
Aaron Levy
Well, I think youâd find it interesting if you go to that same logo designer and sit in in one of their internal meetings or discussion with a boss about a project, because I think itâs not that certain types of people do or donât do it. I think, yes, that does happen. Itâs also the culture and the team by which we operate and agree to do it. And so, itâs kind of part of the agreement with the client if youâre doing something creative with them that thereâs going to be a bunch of iterations in the process, right? Iteration is part of the process.
Pete Mockaitis
There you go, yeah.
Aaron Levy
Yet, are we agreeing to iteration when weâre determining the next steps to go forward or the strategy as a business, or when weâre trying to figure out how to be better at sending client emails? Are we agreeing to iteration? And that iteration, that understanding that thereâs a back and forth, thatâs how you get to the best possible outcome that you need feedback from all points of view and different perspectives to get to the better outcome is something that is often missing.
And thatâs also why when youâre able to create psychological safety, thatâs one of the things that drives team performance. Itâs whatâs missing from a lot of teams, is the ability to feel like, âI can give that feedback and can say what needs to be said even if Iâm a first-year person in this company, and Iâm saying it to the senior director.â
Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, I like that a lot that itâs sort of, like, âAre we agreeing to have these iterations?â Like, âIs there an expectation of iteration?â Oh, is that trademarked yet, Aaron?
Aaron Levy
Itâs not. Itâs not. Itâs a good one.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, letâs see, maybe it needs to be, one of us. Is there an expectation of iteration or is there not? And so, if someone is sharing something and they kind of think, âWell, hey, Iâm a genius. Iâve got it figured out and this is the way forward and what weâre going to do, and you all need to respect that.â And then they get challenged, like, âOh, hey, what if we did this?â Like, âNo, Aaron, actually, Iâd like to do it the way I said I wanted to do it,â like a little snippy there. Itâs like, âOh, okay. Note to self: Donât speak up. I donât feel psychological safety.â
And then, yeah, I think youâve nailed it there. Itâs, âDo we or do we not have an expectation of iteration?â And I think, for the most part, itâd behoove us to have that about most things. Is that fair to say in your view?
Aaron Levy
Iâll give you the way in which I think about it. I go on a daily basis to meet with new groups of people and do, weâd dive into trainings. And most of the time, theyâre 20 or 40 hours over the course of 6 to 12 months, but sometimes itâs just a day, or a day and a half, or itâs an hour. And even in that amount of time with a group that Iâm just working with the first time, I create a set of agreements with them and we establish agreements for how weâre going to work together in this room.
And one of the agreements, to what you said, Pete, is do the next hard thing. And what we mean by do the next hard thing is challenge yourself, get out of your comfort zone, speak up, try things out and make mistakes, challenge me. And so, in doing that, the expectation is someone to raise their hand and say, âYou know what, Aaron, I disagree with you.â Thatâs what we look for because thatâs how you breathe and grow great learning and great development. Itâs how you process information. Itâs not supposed to all be clean and logical. Itâs supposed to be a little bit messy.
And so, when you ask, âIs that something that should happen all the time?â Yeah. Let me just extrapolate. If Iâm doing that in an hour of session with a group that Iâm meeting with once, imagine what you could benefit from if youâre doing that with people you work with on a daily basis.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, so what Iâm loving here is that youâre so gung-ho on these agreements. Iâd love to hear what do you find are some of the top agreements that make a world of difference in unlocking high performance?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, I think the number one agreement that makes the world of difference in high performance and also, in my mind, just the world a better place, and the way in which I describe it is itâs called embracing a beginnerâs mind. And I go back to this quote by Gino Wickman from the book Traction where says, âThe mind is like a parachute. It has to be opened for it to work.â
And if weâre not coming into a room, a situation, an environment with our minds open to different possibilities, then we really have a narrow perspective. And when you have that open perspective, it just creates so much more possibility, so much more growth, so much more learning, so much more development, so much more opportunity.
And so, that is the key indicator of success with employees on my company, with leaders that we work with, with clients that we work with. If they have that, which we seek out of all those different constituents, then success will be there, and high-performing teams will thrive if you have, at least, a beginnerâs mind. So, a beginnerâs mindset is the biggest one in my mind.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thatâs a great one. And lay on another one or two for us.
Aaron Levy
Yeah. Act with authenticity and humility. The way in which I describe this is itâs almost like you can sit back in your chair and you can finally take a breath. You donât have to put on a mask of the work you. You donât have to be the leader that has all the answers. You donât have to be the Steve Jobs who is brash and rude, or the Bill Gates who is measure three times then cut once. The right type of leader and the right type of contributor you can be is actually just being yourself.
Trying to be somebody else, being inauthentic, people see through that. Weâre trained at understanding and seeing facial expressions and emotions, whether we know weâre trained or not, weâve been doing it since weâre little kids before we could even talk. We can understand facial expressions and body language.
And so, when weâre inauthentic, it feeds and it breathes to other people. And so, being authentic, and humble, too, not just braggadocious, but also humble and having some humility to how you show up in this world is one of those things that is just freeing. It kind of unlocks and releases this mask that a lot of us tend to put on when we go into work and want to be awesome by trying to be awesome, as opposed to being ourselves, embracing beginnerâs mind, doing the next hard thing, and doing the work.
Pete Mockaitis
Good stuff. Aaron, tell me, anything else you really want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, I would say one of the agreements that I constantly bring up is assume positive intent. Oftentimes, when weâre in the workplace, we can read an email or a text message, we go, âOh, why did sheâŚ?â And think that somebody else is out there trying to hurt you, and we constantly go like itâs a battle, like people are trying to hurt us, that weâre working with.
The truth is that most people are just trying their best to do their best. And they mightâve made a mistake, they mightâve done something to really just figure something out, and if we can assume that everybody is doing their best, assume positive intent, itâs going to make the team that you work with a lot happier to be on.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. Well, now, could you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?
Aaron Levy
âBetween stimulus and response there is a space. And in that space lies our freedom and power to choose our response.â
Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. And a favorite study, or experiment, or bit of research?
Aaron Levy
Iâve really enjoyed the Bloomerâs experiment. Do you want me to dive into it or just a high level?
Pete Mockaitis
Well, letâs hear a sentence or two and the setup and the results.
Aaron Levy
Yeah. What they did was they looked at a group of students and they randomly assigned certain students to be high performers or bloomers, and another group of students to be non-high performers. They just picked them out of a hat basically. They didnât tell the students that they were labeled as high performer or not but they did tell their teacher.
And as they looked at the course of the year and saw what happened, what they realized was the people labeled as high performers dramatically outperformed, statistically significantly outperformed, the non-high performers. And whatâs interesting is, again, the students didnât know. But who knew? The teachers.
And what the teachers did, subconsciously, is they gave more energy and attention and focus. They actually just spent more time listening and hearing those students that they thought were high performers. The coolest thing about this, to me, is the question that comes out of it, which is, âWhat if we treated everybody like a high performer? What would be possible then?â
And so, thatâs something I keep in my mind and have our leaders think about, âWhat if instead of treating your high performers like high performers, what if you treated the other people in your team like they have the opportunity to be high performers? How much better would they do? How much more would they grow? How much better would your team do as a result?â
Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, this reminds me of â whatâs that educational teacher movie, Stand and Deliver?
Aaron Levy
Oh, yeah.
Pete Mockaitis
And Jaime Escalante, he says that students will rise to the level of expectations. And I think there really is some truth to that. Thank you.
Aaron Levy
Youâre welcome. Totally. Yeah, thank you for asking that. Thatâs just a fun one that Iâve really enjoyed lately.
Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?
Aaron Levy
Iâll go with a recent book that I just really, really enjoyed, which is Give and Take by Adam Grant. I took a while to read it because I thought I knew what it was about, itâs about givers and takers. But itâs just diving into it more. It talks about, really, the way in which we show up with other people and what we get when we give.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, you know, I like the way you said that. It took you a while to read because you thought you knew what was in it. Iâm in the same boat. So, Iâm putting you on the spot. Can you share with us an insight that you didnât have until you actually read it as opposed to just thinking you already knew it?
Aaron Levy
Yeah, Iâll share one insight. Itâs actually from a study by Elliot Aronson, itâs called The Pratfall Effect. And in it, what came out of this was, as a giver, or just as a person, you donât always have to have the right answer, you donât always have to be perfect. Actually, what the studies show is youâre liked more if you make some mistakes, if you screw up a little bit. As long as youâre still seen as competent, if you screw up a little bit, youâre seen more as human and so people like you more.
So, if youâre a lawyer who has a stutter, that actually could improve your likelihood of winning a case. And so, thatâs just something I wouldnât have imagined was in Give and Take, and it was. And the way it was explained and shared and the stories behind it, Adam Grant is awesome. Iâm just a really big fan of the way he thinks about the workplace, the way he thinks about people, and the way he shares stories.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. And how about a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?
Aaron Levy
So, I have been using, just lately, honestly, lately, the Google Tasks button. And so, Google Tasks is on my phone, Google Tasks is on my calendar and on my email, and itâs just really easy to just put things in a checklist. For a while, I would email myself, âDo this, do that,â and Iâd had it come to my inbox after out for a day with 20 emails from Aaron to Aaron that just has a different task, and it was silly. And so, just compiling them in a simple to-do list. The thing I like about it is in the place I work so it comes up right in my email.
Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?
Aaron Levy
Meditating.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. And is there a particular nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks; they repeat it back to you often?
Aaron Levy
Feedback is a gift.
Pete Mockaitis
And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?
Aaron Levy
They can go to RaiseBar.co or the book website which is OpenHonestandDirect.com. On there is a whole toolkit of some of the tools we actually talked about today.
Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for those seeking to be awesome at their jobs?
Aaron Levy
Yeah. Pick one thing from todayâs conversation and practice it and aim for consistency over the next week. So, just one thing that you took away, whether itâs waiting five minutes and having a phone call as opposed to drafting an email, or itâs practicing avoiding using absolutes. Work on being consistent on just one thing, thatâs my call to action for people listening.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. Aaron, itâs been fun once again. Keep up the good work and keep raising the bar.
Aaron Levy
Oh, itâs been a pleasure. Thank you for having me on.