Tag

Relationships Archives - Page 4 of 61 - How to be Awesome at Your Job

2025 GREATS: 1020: The Three Keys to Being Inspirational with Adam Galinsky

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Adam Galinsky reveals the core skills anyone can master for more inspiring leadership.

You’ll Learn

  1. The easiest way to uplift the people around you 
  2. The 15-minute exercise that makes you visionary 
  3. The quick trick to feeling more confident and powerful 

About Adam 

Adam Galinsky is a celebrated social psychologist at Columbia Business School known for his research on leadership, decision-making, teams and ethics. His scientific research—consisting of over 1000 studies published in over 200 scientific articles—has been cited more than 64,000 times. In Galinsky’s latest book, Inspire, he weaves together his decades of research and global consulting experience to reveal the science of how to become more inspiring. His TED Talk, “How to Speak Up For Yourself,” has been viewed more than 7.5 million times and his book Friend and Foe, was an audible and eBook bestseller. 

Resources Mentioned

Thank You, Sponsors!

  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Taelor. Visit taelor.style and get 10% off gift cards with the code PODCASTGIFT
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Adam Galinsky Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Adam, welcome.

Adam Galinsky
Thanks so much for having me, Pete.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m excited to dig into your wisdom about your book, Inspire, to get inspired, to become more inspiring. So, no pressure, Adam, but we’re expecting lots of inspiration to be flowing from you here today.

Adam Galinsky
I hope I can deliver.

Pete Mockaitis
Me too. Well, so tell us, you study this stuff. I’d like to hear, in your own lived experience, who’s the most inspiring person you’ve encountered and what is it about them that inspired you?

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, it’s interesting. I’ve been inspired by a number of people in my life. One person that inspired me really deeply is my dad and even my mom too. So, both my parents and their different ways. One of the things I talk about in the book is I really compare and contrast two types of leaders that tend to be in our orbit, the inspiring leaders, but also the infuriating leaders.

And I think one of the things, when I think about both my parents, I immediately think about their inspiring characteristics, but also their infuriating flaws that they had. And so, I think one of the things in studying this topic is, probably maybe the single biggest insight that I’ve discovered is I’ve actually answered an age-old question that’s bedeviled people for centuries, which is, “Are inspiring leaders born or are they made?”

And what I’ve discovered is, I think, pretty definitively, that inspiring leaders are truly made. And the reason why I know this is because there is, and the thing that I’ve established in my research, is that there is a universal set of characteristics that make up the inspiring person. And these characteristics exist in every single country, on every continent in the world. There’s not a single inspiring characteristic that doesn’t exist in every other country, that exists in one country. It exists in every country.

And because there is this universal set of characteristics, those can be learned, they can be practiced, they can be nurtured, and so that we can become more inspiring over time. And if we go back to thinking a little about my parents, and I said they’re inspiring and they’re infuriating, the thing that really, what my research shows, is that it’s not who we are, it’s really what we do. It’s our behavior, our current behavior, whatever we’re doing today can either inspire or infuriate.

And that means that even if we were amazing yesterday, we may be a total infuriating dad today but the good news is we could be even more inspiring tomorrow.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, it’s good news that inspirational leaders are made and not born, otherwise you’d have a pretty short book and podcast, I imagine, Adam.

Adam Galinsky
That’s right, yes. Well, it could be a whole discussion of how to select those people, right? So wouldn’t be necessarily that short, but it would be a different conversation.

Pete Mockaitis
It would be. Well, and not as much fun because, I mean, I am inspired by the notion of being inspirational, to get meta with you. And I do definitely want to dig into this set of characteristics, what are they, and how do we learn them. But first I’d like to hear, generally speaking, as you’ve dug into all this literature and done the research, any big surprising or counterintuitive discoveries that made you go, “Huh, how about that”?

Adam Galinsky
I think that one of the things I discovered over the course of doing 25 years of scientific research is the power of not just thinking about ourselves, but thinking about others. And so, one of the first things that I ended up studying in my dissertation was a notion of perspective-taking. And when we take the perspective of other people, it opens up a lot of different avenues and possibilities that we might not know were available to us.

And so, it helps us be better negotiators. It helps us be better leaders. It helps us be more inclusive, give better feedback. Like, you could do a whole list of the things that perspective-taking provides to you. But this is one example, I have a paper that’s coming out in the top psychology, social psychology journal in the world, the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, in January, a paper I’ve worked on for a number of years.

And the title of the paper is called “The Vicious Cycle of Status and Security.” And so, one of the mistakes that the people who are insecure about where they stand in the world make is they think they have to tout their accomplishments. They have to show what they have done. And what my research shows is that, when we’re feeling insecure, we feel reluctant to credit other people for their contributions to us, thinking it’ll undermine our own standing.

But what my research shows really definitively, even in some of the most competitive contexts, that when we are generous in spirit towards other people, when we acknowledge their contributions to our own success, we not only elevate them, but we also elevate ourselves. We actually gain in status through generosity.

And I think that’s one of the things that people might instinctively kind of think that might be true, but when they get anxious, when they get insecure, that goes out the window and we focus on the self and, “What I’ve done.” And so, I think maybe the surprising thing is just the power in, “It’s not all about you.” If you focus on others, you’re going to benefit but it’s through this sort of other route, if you will.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I absolutely buy that, and I’ve seen it on both sides of the table in terms of when I’m at my best doing those things, as well as when I see it from others, and I am wowed by, I suppose, anytime someone just is generous in terms of, I guess I think about in sales conversations in which someone says, “Hey, we’d love to take your money, but actually I don’t think we’re the best fit for you. You should go with it over in this direction instead.”

I end up liking them more and giving them more referrals. It’s like, “You got to talk to these guys. They’re so honest. They’re so great. They’ll help you out or tell you who could help you better.” And it’s a world I want to live in, you know? So, I think that’s beautiful.

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, I think that’s right.When we do something that doesn’t look like in our best interest, it seems more authentic and genuine, because “Why would they be doing it if they didn’t really believe it?” And I think that becomes really powerful for that. And it also just highlights how important our reputation is to us, like, how people think about us, how they talk about us, what they share about us.

And so, that’s another, I think, I use this phrase that I really like about, “spreading the seeds of inspiration.” And I’ll come back to this later, but I have an acronym that I use called REAP. And it’s a Hananim from the Bible and, “Reap what you sow.” But the idea is that what you put out in the world comes back to you. So, if you’re inspiring to others, they’re going to be inspiring to you. But if you’re infuriating to others, you’re going to get infuriation back. And I think that’s something so important.

One of the foundations, and we’ll talk about the characteristics, as you said, and sort of how we can utilize those characteristics, but one of the foundations is really, like, living your values, and how you can live your values. And my number one value, I have a values card that’s in my pocket with my top five values and in a hierarchy. My number one value is generosity. And it’s that idea that if we’re generous to other people, not just in substance, but even in spirit, we’re going to produce a better world, not only for others, but also for ourselves.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, let’s dig into some of these characteristics. Lay them on us.

Adam Galinsky
Sure. Well, so just to give your listeners a little background. So, what I’ve done over the last 20 years is I’ve asked people all over the world to tell me about a leader that inspired them. And I’ve asked people, “Well, what does it mean to be inspired?” And people use words like energy or warmth or light.

And the way that I describe it is a wellspring of hope and possibility. It changes you inside. It gives you this feeling. And I say to people, “What was it about that person that inspired you? I want you to tell me the exact characteristic. Be a scientist. Pinpoint what it is that really changed you inside.” And then over the course of time, I started asking another question, I said, “Okay, I want to talk about a different leader that changed you inside. But instead of creating that wellspring of hope and possibility, they created this seething cauldron of rage and resentment. And what was it about that leader that made your blood boil, that infuriated you?” And so, by collecting thousands, and probably even tens of thousands of these examples across the globe, I’ve been able to sort of analyze and study them and use sort of scientific techniques to reduce them to some core factors.

And these three universal factors, I’ll tell you sort of the first thing, my first insight is that the inspiring leader and the infuriating leader are really mirror images of each other, and they exist on this continuum, this enduring continuum that’s made up of “How are you behaving today?” And so, just as a couple quick examples, an inspiring leader is generous. We already used the word generosity, right? Infuriating leader is selfish.

Inspiring leader is courageous. Infuriating leader is cowardly. Inspiring leader sees the big picture. Infuriating leader is small-minded, lost in the weeds. So, one of the things we can start to see is that these are mirror images of each other. And the second thing is that continuum is made up of these three enduring factors. There’s being visionary, which is how we see the world. There is being an exemplar of desired behavior, how we are in the world. And then being a mentor, how we interact with others in the world.

And one of things that I’ve discovered is there’s a reason why these are the three universal factors. And the reason why these are the three universal factors is because they each satisfy a fundamental human need. We’re inspiring people because we’re satisfying a need. So, to be visionary satisfies a human need for meaning and understanding. We crave meaning.

To be exemplar satisfies the fundamental human need to feel protected and safe, but also to feel propelled by people’s passion and energy. And then mentor is one of the universal factors because it fulfills the fundamental human needs for a sense of belonging and inclusion on the one hand, but feeling like that you have status and are respected on the other hand.

And so, these are these three universal factors. I actually have a term that I use, a mnemonic device to help people remember it. I call it the VEM diagram of inspiring leadership. So, it’s like a Venn diagram, you have visionary, you have exemplary, you have mentor, and inspiring in the middle of those concentric circles but that really sort of captures those three elements.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, you brought the goods and some social psychology chops in action, our deep human needs. And on the mentor side, I’m thinking about, we got the belonging and the inclusion and also at the sense of learning growth mastery that occurs when we’re getting good tidbits from a mentor. Like, “Oh, wow, that’s brilliant. And now my skills have been upgraded and I feel great as a result of that as well.” So, we’re ticking all kinds of deep human boxes here.

Now, I’ll tell you, Adam, when you said that these inspiring leaders are made and not born, it feels like a tall mountain to climb to just develop these characteristics within us. If we’re not so visionary and exemplary and mentor-y, how do we get more of that goodness going for us?

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, absolutely. So, for each of these, I can go into a little bit more detail, but also say, like, “How do we get into a visionary state of mind that makes us and propels us to be more visionary? How do we get into an exemplar state of mind? How do we do those things?” And so, let me just start with, I think, visionary is such a straightforward one and really helpful. So, what does it mean to be visionary?

Well, visionary has three characteristics. It’s kind of like what we say, is one of it, how we say it and when we say it. And the what basically is big picture, optimistic vision of the future. So, there’s, we see the big picture, but we also see a positive version of what the world can look like. Now, how do we say it? Well, my research shows and other people’s research shows is you want to do two things. You want to simplify it to its essence, but you also want to visualize it, make it come to life.

So, one of the examples I love to give is, you can have the mission, “Our mission is to have satisfied customers.” That’s a good mission, right? You want to have your customers be satisfied. But now let’s just tweak it a little bit and see how it changes, “Our mission is to make our customers smile.” Now that word smile is something we can visually see.

And then we can think about, “Well, what is it that we can do to bring that smile onto our customers’ face?” And that actually simple change from satisfied customers to make our customers smile, engages people more and motivates them more. It produces better outcomes, better products, if you will.

And then the final thing is that if you want your vision to stick, you got to share it and repeat it again and again and again and again. And one of the things I think we fail a lot of times is we fail to recognize that for something to stick, we need to hear it a lot of times. I mean, here’s a good example. What does almost every song in the world have?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, a refrain, a chorus.

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, a chorus, a refrain, right? That tells us, if almost every song in the world has the same exact feature, a repeated line, a repeated chorus, a repeated frame, that probably tells us the human mind needs some central idea to be repeated again and again. And so, that’s another thing that I find that people are really good at. So, now we can be both practical, very specific, but we can also be sort of a little bit broader. So, here’s a practical thing.

Look at how you’re communicating and ask, “Can I simplify this? Can I be more economical in my words? But can I, in doing that, also make it more visual and vivid and metaphorical and come to life?” So, that’s like a very practical thing you could do. But what I’ve also shown is “How do we get into a general visionary state of mind where we can really see the big picture?” And that is a technique that comes back to what I said earlier about values.

And so, one of the things that two decades of research has shown, my own research has shown this, I’ve done multiple studies, that if you get people to reflect on their values, and I call this your values hierarchy. My colleague, Paul Ingram, has done amazing research on this. So, this is what we tell people, “Think about your values, what really matters to you. Now pick four or five values and put them into a hierarchy where the top value sort of animates the rest of your values. Now that’s your value hierarchy. Now what I want you to do is I want you to think about why those values matter to you. Also, when have you demonstrated those values in your daily life?”

And here’s one study we did. One of the worst things that can happen to anyone in their life is to be unemployed, to be laid off, to be fired, to lose your job. It increases anxiety, depression, even suicide. So, we worked with a Swiss employment agency, a government employment agency, every citizen in Switzerland, if they want to get unemployment benefits, has to go into one of these agencies and register. And we did a little experiment.

Fifteen-minute intervention for half of these people. We did exactly what I just told you. Reflect on your values, why they matter, how you’ve demonstrated them. Two months later, they were twice as likely to have found a job. In fact, the effect was so strong, we stopped the experiment and gave everybody the values intervention.

And so, when we reflect on our values, it has two things that I think are incredibly important. One is it helps us see the big picture, what really matters. But two is I think it has this element of optimism. It gives us that energy to go forward. Because what do you need to do to get a job? You got to apply, you got to suffer the slings and arrows of rejections, right? And you got to keep going, right? And you got to keep applying to other jobs. And so, reflecting on our values both helps you see what really matters and gives you that optimistic positive energy to go forward.

So, we can become more visionary both with very fine-tuned practicality, “How do I simplify my messages?” or, “How do I make sure that people see the big picture?” But we can also do it more sort of organically by reflecting on our values.

Pete Mockaitis
Adam, what we love to hear so much here is a little bit of an effort produces just an extraordinary result. Like a 15-minute value intervention is phenomenal, which reminds me of a conversation we had with Dan Cable about, I think, similarly, a short, it might’ve been a one-hour intervention, in terms of introducing yourself to your colleagues about who you are at your best, reduce the attrition by over 30%.

And so, I think that is just astounding in terms of zooming in on this stuff, it’s just amazing in that our human spirit, I don’t know how to say it, Adam, but it seems like it’s so easy for us to lose sight of our values, our North Star, that which makes us come alive and be all we can be. And, apparently, we can get there with just a pretty quick refresher.

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, I think this is a great transition to the second universal factor of being exemplar, because I think Dan’s intervention is, it’s a little bit about values, but it’s also something a little bit broader. So, what does it mean to be an exemplar of desired behavior? So, what it means is being a calm and courageous protector, who’s authentically passionate, who’s super, but also human. They’re not perfect. They have their own vulnerabilities.

And so, I’ve shown in a lot of different ways why that matters. So, how do we get people into an exemplar state of mind? Well, in 2003, I introduced something, and Dan’s research kind of builds all of this, an intervention that has been used in hundreds of experiments across the world, hundreds of experiments across the world. And we basically did analysis of all those experiments and showed that it’s got deep scientific validity.

But we simply asked people to kind of do what Dan did, but we said, “Think about a time when you were powerful, in control, and your best self.” And we targeted at a more micro level. So, imagine you’re going into a negotiation, “Think about when you’re powerful and in control and your best self at the negotiating table.” Or you’re going in for an interview, “Think about when you’re powerful and in control your best self in an interview.” Or think about giving a speech in front of people, “Think about the time when you felt powerful, really in control on that stage.”

And so, what that does, the reason why that’s so powerful, that reflection, is because you’re building off your own lived experience, authentically building off your own lived experience. You’re not recalling what someone else did. You can feel yourself.

You’re like, “Yeah, I negotiated.” You might’ve negotiated one time out of ten well, but you can still recall that one time you did it well, right? And that’s a real powerful way to leverage that. And we’ve shown in our research that when you do that, people do better in interviews. We actually have the people are more likely to get a job. We’ve shown they give better speeches. Other people in Europe have used my intervention, measured people’s physiological reactivity before a very stressful event, and they were physiologically calmer after engaging in that.

And so, one of the things that the way they like to describe it is if you want to be super, you got to be able to remember when you were super. And that’s sort of one way of being able to tap. And then you go out and act super when you can do that. And so, I think that’s one thing that’s just so powerful and so important for people is to remember that we have those experience when we did something really, really well and we can recall and really sort of build off those experiences.

Now, I hope you don’t mind, but I want to introduce another topic really quickly that I think is really important.

So, I know you have three kids, and so you’re a parent, you’re a dad, and so your kids look up to you because as that parent, it could be just because you admire someone. It could be because someone’s really important to you. And so, anytime someone gives you their attention, you, your behavior, your words, the way you stand, the way you interact are going to have a big impact on people.

And so, I’ve coined a phrase. I call it the leadership amplification effect or the leader amplification effect. And the leader amplification effect basically says that when we’re in a position of leadership or where people are looking up to us or we really matter to them, they’re paying attention to us, their eyes are on us. And one of the foundational, fundamental scientific truths that govern all of mental life is that the things that we pay attention to get amplified. Whatever stimulus we’re looking at, that stimulus will have a bigger impact on us. We’ll get intensified reactions.

And so, it’s just sort of one example would be, I still remember 30 years ago, my first doctoral seminar when I was a PhD student with a guy who’d win the Nobel Prize in Economics, and I raised my hand one day, first day of class, have 11 fellow students, I want to demonstrate that I belong, I’m at Princeton University, this Ivy League thing, but feeling a little insecure, and I think I have a really nice point to make. And I still remember what Danny did 40 years later, he crossed his arms, shook his head, scrunched up his face and said, “That’s not right at all.”

And then he smiled and he moved on and the rest of class moved on. But, like, I was frozen. I felt humiliated. It was crushing to me. And so, Danny doesn’t remember this. Like, it was nothing to him, but to me, it just felt like humiliating criticism. But, like, six weeks later, I’m walking in the hallway and Danny, without stopping, he doesn’t even stop walking, he just says over his shoulder, “Hey, Adam, I love reading your reflection papers. You’re a great writer.” And then he turned the corner but that comment, like, has nurtured me for 30 years.

And so, one of things is that when we’re in a position of leadership, the reason why our words matter so much, the way we are in the world, how we interact with others matters so much is people are paying attention to us. And some of it is because we have power and authority, but sometimes it’s just because they look up to us and they care about what we think. And our whispers are going to be shouts, our comments are going to get amplified, and the reactions we produce are going to be intensified.

And so, one of the things we have to learn as parents, but as leaders, is that nothing we say is offhand. Everything has an impact. And so, that’s one of the things we have to be aware of to be inspiring is to recognize the powerful impact that our words, behaviors, and interactions have.

Pete Mockaitis
That is huge. And I’ve heard a number of leaders say, and I’ve lived this myself that, “It’s the weirdest thing. When I became a leader, my suggestions became commands.” And so, that’s one form of the amplification, but it’s great to flag the other ways that your stuff is being amplified and the impact and consequences of that there.

Adam Galinsky
Here’s one of my favorite stories about this. Barry Salzberg became CEO of Global Deloitte, which, you know, has tens of thousands of employees. And about six months into being CEO, he noticed that there were bananas at every sort of executive meeting. And he’s like, “God, I’ve been at Deloitte for 30 years. Is it a symbol of Deloitte I didn’t know about? Or does someone really important love bananas?”

So, he asked his assistant, he said, “Hey, why do we have bananas at every meeting?” She said, “Because you love bananas.” He’s like, “Wait, what?” So, the first time he walked into a meeting where she was present, she was paying incredible close attention to everything he did because she wanted to please him.

And she noticed he picked up a banana with a little bit of enthusiasm. And so, she coded in her mind, “Barry Salzberg loves bananas. We must have bananas at every meeting.” And that’s not even a suggestion. That’s just like, he’s like, “Ooh, banana,” he just might want to have a little potassium that day but then it became a law.

And so, that’s sort of a great example of the leadership amplification effect. He didn’t even say anything to anyone. It wasn’t even a suggestion. It was just a dollop of enthusiasm.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, that is telling. Well, I’d love to get your perspective, Adam, before we hear about some of your favorite things. Given what you’ve learned about the impact of the things we do or don’t do, and then the relative prevalence of these behaviors, if you can lay on us just a couple of your top do’s and don’ts that you think can make a world of difference for us, what would they be?

Adam Galinsky
I’ll go through a few do’s. So, the first one is always think about the big picture. Like, what is really going on here? Like, try to put things into context to understand people’s behaviors. I’ll just give two examples that relate to being a parent because I think they’re really, really powerful. I had two kids, very close in age, just like you. And so, I had a kindergartener and a first grader. And the kindergartner’s classroom was on the second floor and the first grader’s class was on the third floor, and I take them to school every day.

So, naturally, I dropped the kindergartner first because he’s, as we walk up the stairs, my first grader is very type A, very impatient, “I want to get to school.” My kindergartner, like most second borns, likes to relax a little bit, take his time, likes to a big ritual with me saying goodbye, and Asher would be like, “Hurry up, Aidan. Hurry up Aidan,” and I would get very frustrated at Asher. I’d be like, “Just be patient. Why can’t you be patient?” And then Asher would march upstairs and run in the classroom without saying goodbye to me.

And about a month into this, we were walking with Aidan, I had an epiphany. And I was like, “What if I drop Asher off first?” So, I said to my kids, I said, “Hey, why don’t we all walk up to the third floor and drop Asher off first, then walk down to the second floor?” And it was transformational. So, Asher got to go at the time he wanted to, he’d give me a hug, I’d get to go downstairs, Aidan could take his time, no one was rushing him.

And by day three of this, his teacher, I never even talked about this with his teacher, Aidan’s teacher, the kindergartner’s teacher said, “Wow, dropping Asher off first has been a big success.” Like, she noticed, she could see Asher getting frustrated and angry. And, like, I could yell at Asher, I could tell him to be patient, I could try to give him some type of gummy to make him calmer, but he was saying, “I need to get the class on time.”

And so, then if we start thinking, “How can I allow Asher to meet his needs, but also have Aidan meet his needs?” We just reversed the drop-off order. And so, when I talk about seeing the big picture, it’s like really sort of understanding all the people that are in sort of an orbit and how they interact. And so, I think these are very, very, powerful things. What is it that people need? I mentioned these fundamental human needs. What does this person need right now?

I’ll give you just one other quick example, it’s very top of mind. My mother-in-law has lived with us for eight years and my older son is very attached to her and she’s moving now to Las Vegas. And about, she’s moving literally next week, and about two weeks ago, my son started being just really salty towards his mom, my wife, just being really rude to her and angry at her. And she was getting a little, like, upset by this, and it’s hard not to take it personally.

But the big picture is he’s mad that his grandmother is leaving, and he’s furious, but he can’t express it to her. In fact, they’ve actually never had a fight. Like, he’s her safe person. And so, he’s taking out on the person that’s closest, the mom. And so, once you see the big picture, you can start to recognize what’s going on. But then we can be visionary. We can start to help him have context for his feelings, “Hey, Asher, I know you’re really, you know, it’s probably, it’s really hard with Lola leaving.”

And the other day he whispered to me, he didn’t want his brother to hear this, he said, “I’m really sad that Lola is leaving.” And so, that’s what I mean by sort of being visionary. How do we see the big picture and really recognize what really, really needs to happen? Seeing the big picture allows people to handle the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune. Like, think about people going into war, soldiers potentially giving up their life, but for a bigger idea. So, the first do is be the big picture.

The second do is to remember that when we are in these positions of leadership, our emotions are infectious. And so, when we’re calm, we calm other people down. But if we’re anxious, we’re going to make other people even more anxious. So, we really have a duty and a responsibility to regulate our own emotions in those experiences, even as parents to not get angry.

My old dean, he would have these faculty meetings where people were speaking viciously to him, and he was always so calm. And I was just so amazed that he could just handle that. Like, he never reacted, he never blew off the handle. Apparently, he did so sometimes in private, but like never in public when it really mattered. And so, I think that’s the other do.

And then the final do that I’ll give is elevate others. When you see someone do something good, let them know. And when they did something that really helped you, express gratitude. And I’ll tell you a story about that. Every time I teach, I give people the leader amplification effect call to action. And I say, “I want you to pick three people that are less powerful than you, and I want you to send them some message that says, ‘Hey, you really knocked that presentation out of the park,’ or, ‘Thank you so much for helping me on that report. I couldn’t have done it without you.’ And I want you to be specific.”

Because if you come across as inauthentic, that’s infuriating, right? And so, this was 10:15, I was in front of a group of 50 CEOs and presidents. And at 10:29, one of them raised his hand and said, “I already sent my three emails, already got three responses, and they were gushing with excitement. One of them said, ‘I’m finally going to take my spouse to that new restaurant they always wanted to go to.’”

And I really liked this example because, first of all, it proved something I found in my research, which is people in powerful roles are very impulsive. This guy couldn’t even wait to 10:30 in the break. He had to like send it off right away. But it also shows it didn’t take him any time at all to do it. Like, it cost him a couple of minutes and it transformed people’s lives.

Pete Mockaitis
And what’s the content of the email? You just say, hey, what you think is great about them or…?

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, or just anyone, just think about three people who, in your orbit, who have less power than you, that deserve some expression of gratitude or praise and be specific about what they did. So, it could be anything, you know. And I was telling this story, and a president of a bank, 1,400 employees that are under his charge. He said, actually, “Actually, I do that every day.” And I said, “Do what?” He said, “I actually send out an email to every single employee on their birthday.”

And he showed me an example. He said, “Here’s the one I sent this morning. It said like, ‘Hey, Trisha, I hope you have a great birthday. How was bowling and track this weekend?’” That’s all he wrote. And then he showed me her response. It was like a novel, like described everything about bowling and track. He’s like, “You know, I actually never even read her email because it’s so long.” But like she was so excited to get this.

And one of the things that this president said, which really struck me, is he said, “I know my message puts a skip in their step but it actually puts a skip in my step. Like, I get their message back and I feel so good.”

And so, one of the things that I’ve come to the conclusion of, here’s a do and a don’t. Now we always say, “Do something in person, communicate with someone in person, face-to-face is better.” But if I were to praise you, Pete, and say, “Oh, my God, you are the best podcaster I ever saw.”

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, shucks Adam. Thank you.

Adam Galinsky
Yeah, it makes you a little bit uncomfortable, right, because, like, “How do I respond to that?” It feels good. But now imagine I wrote that to you later and you can read it, you can reread it.

Pete Mockaitis
Save it and read it when I need to read it months later.

Adam Galinsky
You can save it. You can savor it. You can send it to your spouse. You can show it to your eight-year-old, and say, “Look what this person said about me.” So, actually, by writing it, and then it’s much easier for people. Like, if I say to you, you’re like, you did that, you did, you’re kind of like a little bit embarrassed, a little bit, “Oh, thanks,” you’re trying to push it away.

But if I were to send them by email, you’d be like, “Oh, thanks so much. This is what I work towards,” you’d be more expressive over writing. And when I praised my dean yesterday, I mentioned I praised my dean, there was a long awkward silence. He didn’t really know how to deal with it. And then he sort of commented about how much he’d learned from the management division and stuff like that.

So, here’s an example where putting something in writing is better than saying it in person because you let them savor it, you let them share it, and you let them respond in a gushing way that lets them express their appreciation but puts a skip in your step.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautifully said. Thank you. Now could you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Adam Galinsky
One of my favorite quotes of all time is from Confucius, and it says, “Tell me and I will forget. Show me and I may understand. But only when you involve me will I truly remember.”

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Adam Galinsky
Here’s a study that I love more than any other study, and I’ve been using it in my teaching for 25 years. It’s one of my dissertation advisers, Marcia Johnson. She did this in 1973 or ’74, and it’s such a simple study but it’s so profound. She just basically gave people a description of something.

It goes something like this, it says like, “First you take the things and separate them into different piles. Then you have to decide if you have to go somewhere else. If you have to go somewhere else, then you do that. But you also don’t want to do too much at the same time. And after you’re done, then you put things back into their appropriate places.”

And I’ve given this to thousands of people across the globe when I’m presenting and I ask people, “Does anyone know what’s going on in this scenario?” And, like, less than five people present and can solve it. So that’s one of her conditions. Here’s her other condition. She gave them a title and then she read the description to them.

And the title in this case was, drum roll, “Doing the laundry.” And then you realize, “Ah, doing the laundry, separating things, whites and darks. Okay, do you have a washing machine here or do you have to go somewhere else? Oh, yeah, you don’t want to overstuff that because you might break the machine or ruin things. And then you put them back in their places.”

Now, the reason why this experiment is so powerful is because it’s not just that it was easier to read when you got the title, it’s what happened later. When she asked people to recall what they read, the people who got the title couldn’t remember it word for word, but they remember the gist. And the people who didn’t get the title, some of them couldn’t even remember reading anything, it was like they couldn’t even process it.

And so, this is really about being visionary. Being visionary, giving people a vision gives them that title. If you have the title, every word makes sense. Every sentence connects with the other sentences. Other people reading it are, you’re synchronizing with them. And so, to me, it’s like such a small, profound study that really captures that.

I’ll just mention one other study also from the 1970s. But they took two people, let’s say you and I, and we say, “Hey, Pete, you’re going to teach Adam about Indonesia. So, we’re going to give you some material, you’re going to spend 25 minutes learning about this information so that you can teach Adam about it.” And then you’re going to, they give me the same information and say, “Hey, Pete’s going to teach you about Indonesia, but I want you to read this material and study it so you’re prepared.” So, it’s like, just randomly assigned you to be the teacher and me to be the student.

And then later, they give us a test, before we interact, a test on Indonesia, and we had the same amount of time, we had the same material, you would learn it better than I did. And so, just being in that teaching mode makes you process information differently. I think part of it again is being visionary. You’re thinking about the big picture. You’re thinking about how things connect to other. You’re thinking how you’re going to communicate it.

And because you’re doing all of those things, you’re processing, you’re making connections, processing information deeper and really understanding not just the individual facts, but also how they come together. And so, that’s really another story about empowerment that we just talked about, is that like putting people into that teacher frame of mind is more powerful than a student frame of mind.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Adam Galinsky
I mean, I do think my favorite tool is what thing that I kind of came up with in 2003, which is like using our own lived experience to reflect on them at the right moment in time so that we can be whatever we need to be in that moment.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Adam Galinsky
I think the favorite habit that I would say is trying to do that leader amplification effect, that gesture of generosity, ideally. That would be my favorite habit. I haven’t instituted it yet. But I think, “How can we build in habits of generosity?” I think is probably the most important thing. It’s my number one value and I think it really is the key to spreading the seeds of inspiration.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks; they quote it back to you often?

Adam Galinsky
I think one thing that people really find powerful is that leader amplification effect, recognizing that “What I do and the way that I am in the world is really impacting people,” and it’s very eye-opening for people. I’ll tell you one funny story which I really love is I’ve been doing the laundry study for two decades now. And about 10 years ago a woman told me that she wrote, “Do the laundry,” and she put it on her, like, a Post-it next to her screen. And it was on there for like two or three weeks.

And, finally, one of her subordinates walked by and was like, “Are you ever going to do your laundry?” And she’s like, “Oh, it’s actually, it’s like to remind me to always remember, like, the vision and remember the big picture.” And then they started using that as a catchphrase when they felt like they weren’t seeing the big picture. They’re like, say, “Do the laundry,” and then that would get them. So, that’s like an example of a nugget that someone took from one of my lectures and really then implemented it and utilized it and hopefully made their organization better.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Adam Galinsky
AdamGalinsky.com, and the book is Inspire.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Adam Galinsky
Once a month, ask yourself these two questions, “When was I inspiring in the last month and when was I infuriating?” So, that’s sort of one set of reflections and sort of think about what it was.

But also think about “Who was inspiring in your orbit in the last month? What was it about they did that changed you inside? And how could you emulate that behavior?” And so, I want you to take those, your own personal reflections, those emulations, and then I would just want you to form a single intention about one thing that you’re going to do differently in the next month.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Adam, thank you. This is fantastic, inspiring. I wish you much inspiration.

Adam Galinsky
Thank you so much.

1110: How to Multiply Your Opportunities through Smarter LinkedIn Posts with Jason Feifer

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Jason Feifer discusses how to advance your career by creating winning LinkedIn content.

You’ll Learn

  1. Why LinkedIn matters even when you aren’t job hunting
  2. What most get wrong about personal branding
  3. The trick to getting your posts seen on LinkedIn

About Jason

Jason Feifer is the editor in chief of Entrepreneur magazine, a startup advisor, host of the podcasts Build For Tomorrow and Problem Solvers, and has taught his techniques for adapting to change at companies including Pfizer, Microsoft, Chipotle, DraftKings, and Wix. He has worked as an editor at Fast Company, Men’s Health, and Boston magazine, and has written about business and technology for the Washington Post, Slate, Popular Mechanics, and others.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Jason Feifer Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Jason, welcome back!

Jason Feifer
It is so great to be back. I got to say, after we did this the first time, I heard from so many of your listeners, including a woman I went to high school with, which was fun to reconnect after that. So, thank you for having me back.

Pete Mockaitis
Wow, that’s cool. Well, I’m glad. Hey, thanks, listeners, for reaching out. And I know LinkedIn is often one of the platforms where this occurs.

Jason Feifer
Indeed, it is!

Pete Mockaitis
And we’re talking LinkedIn. And, Jason, I want to say thank you because I just, like, impulse invited you to this podcast just because I was looking at your LinkedIn, yet again, and I was like, “By golly, I’ve read Jason’s LinkedIn more than anybody else’s LinkedIn on Earth.”

Jason Feifer
I love hearing that.

Pete Mockaitis
“What is he doing? And I think we all need to know.”

Jason Feifer
I really appreciate that. That is great. I always like to be impulse invited to a podcast.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, well, you impulse accepted.

Jason Feifer
I did very quickly. Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
I mean, that was one of the quickest turnarounds ever. Yeah, so thank you.

Jason Feifer
My pleasure.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, so give us the scoop, like, you’re on LinkedIn, and maybe it’s just me, but it seems like there’s a lot of other folks who are commenting and liking and reacting and following and stuff with your posts. But I find them mesmerizing. Could you orient folks who have not been so lucky as to see your LinkedIn? What are you doing and why?

Jason Feifer
That’s a question. All right. Well, maybe I should propose an outline for this because there’s a whole bunch of different things to discuss, so things I want to cover on this episode with you. Number one, I want to talk about how to build a personal brand very strategically. We’re going to talk about that.

And then, number two, I want to tell you what LinkedIn is looking for, because I’ve had a lot of conversations with the folks who run the algorithms and machines over there, so I understand what is actually working. And then number three is we can talk about how to create great content on LinkedIn. So those are things I think would really answer your question.

But I’ll just start by zooming out and saying that I didn’t understand the point of LinkedIn at all for a long time. I thought it was just a place to promote myself. And so, I would post these promotional things and nothing would happen. Nobody would read it. Nobody would engage. I thought, “This is dead, useless.”

And then I came to understand that you actually are always promoting yourself on LinkedIn, but if you do it overtly, it doesn’t work. If you do it by displaying your knowledge in service of helping others on LinkedIn, then you actually position yourself as an authority on LinkedIn.

And I think that, right now, LinkedIn is the single strongest tool for reaching the people who could be hiring you, who could be promoting you, who could be your customers and clients in the future should you ever start a business. It is LinkedIn. It just is.

So, I started to evolve into a LinkedIn machine, where I now post every day, Monday through Friday. I have 241,000 followers, I think, at current count. And I get a ton of business out of LinkedIn. A ton.

Pete Mockaitis
A ton of business.

Jason Feifer
A ton of them.

Pete Mockaitis
So, folks say, “Jason, I want to give you monies.” And for what? What are you doing for these people?

Jason Feifer
Well, here’s an example. Someone wants me to keynote their conference for their employees. And I say, “Oh, that’s awesome. How did you find me?” And they say, ‘Oh, I follow you on LinkedIn.” Or, people will say, “Hey, I’d love for you to be an advisor to my business.” “Oh, that’s awesome. Let’s talk about that. How did you find me?” “Oh, I’ve been following you on LinkedIn for a long time.” It is always, “I’m following you on LinkedIn.”

And the reason for that is because everything else that I have ever done, and I get to reach a lot of people through newsletters and podcasts and whatever, is all in a way, it’s somewhat boxed in, right? It’s like you have to subscribe to my newsletter to get my newsletter. You have to subscribe to my podcast to get my podcast. But, LinkedIn, if you post something that really hits, it just starts bleeding out into other audience segments that you were not originally reaching.

And then because you’re posting daily, you’re constantly reminding people, “Oh, this person,” “Oh, this person,” “Oh, this person.” I see LinkedIn and doing LinkedIn well as simply about creating signal and noise. Every day there’s a lot of noise. You hear from a lot of people, you see a lot of people, you see constant stuff.

If you can create consistency, “This is who I am. This is what I have to offer. I will be relevant to you every single day,” then people start to recognize you. They start to say, “Oh, Pete, I love that guy. What does he have to say today?” And then after a while, they start to think, “Huh, can I work with that guy? Is there a way I can work with that guy?” And that is where economic opportunity comes from.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So well said. So, LinkedIn is the place where cool things happen in terms of getting hired or perhaps making deals, doing business, selling stuff.

Jason Feifer
Yeah, doing it all.

Pete Mockaitis

And then, so this personal brand…

Jason Feifer
Yeah, and let me add just one other thing to that. Also getting promoted, for real, getting promoted because we’re on a show called How to Be Awesome at Your Job. And the reason for that, this is a really interesting theory that someone floated by me and I’ve tested it out with people and found it to be totally true, is that LinkedIn, if you’re really good at it, creates external validation that then leads to internal validation.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah.

Jason Feifer
Which is to say that if you’re posting and you’re getting lots of people across your industry who are saying, “That’s really smart. This person is really smart. Yeah, I totally agree with that,” then people inside of your company start to see it, and they’re like, “Oh, this person is being externally validated, therefore, I should take them more seriously internally too.”

Pete Mockaitis

You know, that’s really ringing a bell. And I’m thinking back to, well, Bob Cialdini who wrote Influence, science and practice and more, was on the show. Great dude. Great guest. I’m thinking about just that principle of social proof is that, in a way, there’s a lot of things in the world of work that are super ambiguous and subjective.

I mean, if we’re doing like sales, okay, we know, “Okay, that person sold half a million dollars. The other person sold a quarter million dollars. Okay, Bada Bing, Bada Boom.” But in the world of knowledge work where so much of it is just like, “Hey, here’s some ideas that I’m putting forward. Like, are they good? Are they bad?” “Well, we don’t really know.” But if a lot of other people are saying, “Yes, you are brilliant, sir,” they go, “Okay, maybe. Maybe it is.”

Jason Feifer
That’s right. It’s predicated on trust, right? If you’re in a meeting and some people’s crazy random ideas are commanding more attention than other people’s crazy random ideas, and you wonder, “Why is that?” The answer is because of everything that happened before the crazy ideas. It was all the trust-building that went into it.

And so, people are carrying a reputation and, therefore, people are taking more seriously ideas based on reputation. So, if you have a tool where you can build your perception of authority, not just internally, but externally, it will feed back internally and you will walk into that meeting and be the person that people take seriously.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that. Well, now, and to totally reverse that, I’m thinking about instances where, about being not taken seriously in the humor domain. Because sometimes I’ve had the experience where it’s, like, I’ve made a joke and then another person made almost the same joke with the same crowd, you know, just like six people just chit chatting, within minutes, and they got much more laughter than I did.

I mean, and I’m not going to, I’m not trying to be a standup comic. I’m not road-testing material or anything. But I think that maybe these would be the same dynamics at work, it’s like, “Oh, I have a lot of history of this person making me laugh many times. And, therefore, I just kind of fall into that groove again.”

Jason Feifer
Totally. It’s the buy-in. It’s the buy-in. Why is the headliner comedian getting larger laughs than the opening comedian? I mean, maybe the headliner comedian is funnier, but also everyone’s just there to see the headliner comedian. So, they’re bought in on that person. They want to enjoy that person’s jokes more than the other person.

Pete Mockaitis
“I’m here for laughing for you, from you.”

Jason Feifer
Yeah, “I’m here for laughing from you, very specifically from you. So, if you do a thing, I’m going to laugh at it.” And this is the reason to build up your authority. I have this concept, which is that I want to be singular. I think it’s incredibly important for me in my career to be singular, which is to say I am the sole person who you think of or turn to for this.

I have separated myself from everybody else. You don’t sit around, and you’re like, “Hmm, well, who should keynote my conference? I guess, let me just find any random person who talks about change management,” that’s the subject people generally hire me for. No, you want to hire Jason Feifer, “We got to get that guy, that specific guy.”

The more singular you can become and be perceived as, the more in which it’s not just you’re one of many, you’re just the selection today. No, it is you. People want you specifically, the more in which you will succeed. And so, you have to use the tools at your disposal to build that singular-ness, that distinctiveness. And personal brand is just top among your available assets.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. So having a personal brand isn’t just a cutesy thing, that’s a checkbox that we’re “supposed” to check, but rather has substantial real-world consequences that we want working in our favor. So, lay it on us, how do we think about building a personal brand?

Jason Feifer
Okay, let’s do it. So, first of all, if you are not doing this right now, you, person, I’m talking to, because maybe you think, “Ah, that’s not for me. That’s for like, Jason’s got 240,000 followers. He’s like speaking in front of crowds. That’s for him.” No, no, no. Here’s the thing. Personal brands are valuable for everybody and they’ll serve different purposes.

So, my job and my ability to do my job does require having a large audience. It’s the kind of work that I’m in. But that’s not true for most people. Most people just need to reach the right audiences and they can be small and niche. So, an example I always like to offer at the start is my friend, Matt Adelman.

So Matt Adelman, he works at a company. His job is to help brands, like consumer-packaged goods brands, you know, food, beverage, snack brands, but get onto retail shelves, particularly a Target, which is what his expertise is. So, like, he helps people get onto Target, right? So, he doesn’t own the company, he works at the company and that’s his job.

So, he has built a personal brand for himself on LinkedIn in which every single day he is sharing insights about retail, about how to get on retail shelves, about what he’s seeing in retail trends. He’s walking around Target and taking photos of shelves and then posting, you know, “This is the beef jerky aisle is looking interesting and new today,” and whatever it is.

And he’s got like 6,000 followers because he’s been doing this for a while, but it converts, it converts because people see those posts and, eventually, first they say, “Oh, this is useful.” And then they say, “Oh, this guy is consistently useful. I should follow him.” And then they say, “Oh, we should hire that guy,” right? That’s how it happens.

And the reason for that, and this is very, very important, so let us keep it in mind as we do this, and that is that content builds relationships, and relationships convert. That’s it. Content builds relationships and relationships convert. So, when you put content out into the world, people say, “Oh, I like this person. I know this person. Now I feel like I have a relationship with this person.” Pete, that’s why you reached out to me is because you see me on LinkedIn every day and so I’m on top of mind to you.

And then eventually that relationship converts in some way where they say, “I’ve got to have this person on my podcast. I’ve got to hire this person. I’ve got to promote this person.” Okay, so with that as the premise, let’s start by talking about personal brand. Everyone gets the phrase personal brand wrong because they optimize for the word personal, “Oh, I got to post what I had for breakfast on LinkedIn,” or, “I got to…” No, no, no.

We have to actually put the emphasis on the word brand. You are treating yourself like a brand. And what is a brand? A brand is three things. A brand is simple, a brand is repeatable, and a brand is scalable. Just apply that now to the first brand that you can think of. Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, what are they? They’re simple, repeatable, and scalable. You know exactly what Coca-Cola is. You know exactly the message that it has. Happiness.

And then, it’s repeatable. You say it over and over and over again in infinite ways, “Happiness, happiness, happiness.” And then scalable, they’re going to find constant new ways to reach as many people as possible with that message. That’s what a brand is. That’s what you need to become.

So, the first step of this is that you have to turn yourself into something simple. So being a personal brand is not talking about everything. It’s talking about one thing and doing it over and over and over again. So, I have a little framework with four questions that I will share with you for how to simplify yourself, how to turn yourself into something simple. And that is this.

Now, this is something I will caveat that I am usually teaching to people who own businesses, but it can very easily be applied to people who work at businesses, too. So, for someone who’s in a business, it would be like, “What is your product?” But for you, it’s, “What is your deliverable? What is your area of expertise? What is the thing that you hired for?” So that is it. What is that?

And then the second question is, “Who does that serve?” which is to say, “Who are you trying to reach? Who are you trying to impress? Who do you want to be very aware of and interested in you?” Question number three is, “What problems do you solve?” So, for the people that you serve, whether that’s a person, you know, a superior at a company or whatever, or the customer, “What is the problem that you solve?”

And then, number four, very important, most important, “How can you address that problem with content?” So, if I’m Matt who helps companies get onto retail shelves, that is my job. Well, what is my product or what is my service? I help companies get onto retail shelves. Who does that serve? Who do I serve? I serve founders of brands who have products who want to get on retail shelves. What problem do I solve? They don’t know how to get on retail shelves. How do I solve their problem with content? I can inform them about how to get on retail shelves.

Now I have narrowed it really specifically. And then if you want to go even further, I was talking to Matt recently about “How does he take it up a level?” And I said, well, start to think about, “What are the major problems that people have when they come to you for business?” So, it’s like, “Why do they hire you after a previous solution that didn’t work?”

And he’s like, “Oh, well, that’s because they got into Whole Foods, but now they can’t get into Target,” or, “They got into a couple retailers and then their sales flatlined. They can’t figure out what to do.” Great. Okay.

So, you now know the problems that they have, start to answer them in your content. Start to address that in your content, because they’re going to see that you have answers to the problems that they’re walking around with, and now you are incredibly relevant to them.

And now you have to be incredibly specific and specific, I said specific twice, but sure, why not? Because it’s very important. And consistent is what I meant to say. You have to be really consistent about this. Just be really regimented and consistent. Now you are simple. Follow me so far?

Pete Mockaitis

Simple, repeatable, scalable. And I guess I’m thinking that they could be quite possible to come up with some pitfalls, I’m guessing, in terms of, “You’re too generic.” It’s like “Oh, I help businesses with marketing.” It’s like, “Oh, okay. Well, no, no, no, let’s get much more specific here.”

Jason Feifer
Very, very important. Right. Because if you try to be something to everyone, you will be nothing to nobody. And so, the way in which you have to signal value is through a really knowing level of specificity about who you hire. I mean, I tell people this all the time, if they’re building a business, like, “You don’t want to be, ‘Hey, we help businesses with marketing,’ because that doesn’t tell me anything about anything.”

And if I am a business looking for marketing, I’m not going to trust someone who’s just like, “Hey, I help businesses with marketing.” Instead, what you need to do is be incredibly specific about who you serve such that they think, “Oh, this person is for me. This person is for me.” “I help small businesses with less than five employees who are building SaaS products in the finance space with marketing because that is my area of expertise and I understand exactly what they need.”

And if you’re that person, you say, “Oh, my God, finally, I found my person.” And if you’re not, well, that’s fine. That’s not who you’re serving anyway. There’s something to keep in mind. Here’s a little kind of secondary framework here, but it’s something to keep in mind, is that there’s a thing that I like to call the first question. And the first question is the first question that anybody asks whenever they encounter anything.

“Is this for me or is this not for me?” That’s what you’re asking, “Is this for me or is this not for me?” We have limited time. We’re not going to waste our time on things that are not for us. We just want to filter things by, “Is this for me or is this not for me?” So, we started this conversation, and if you’ve made it this far into the episode, then you decided, “Oh, this is for me.” You’re not listening if this is not for you.

So, we have to know, whenever we’re producing something, like content on LinkedIn that’s going to reach people, that people are going to ask that question unconsciously of every single thing that they see, every post that they see as they scroll LinkedIn, they’re going to ask, “Is this for me? Is this not for me? Is this for me?” So, we have to anticipate that, we have to answer it as fast as possible.

So, the first words, and we’ll talk about content later, but like the first words that you write have got to be answering that. The way in which you show up on LinkedIn has to be answering that. The way in which you identify who your target is has to be answering that because, otherwise, people will tune you out. So, yeah, Pete, you’re exactly right. It’s got to be super specific.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. And it’s funny how it’s like the algorithms, and people talk a lot about the algorithm or the algorithms, I think that is, ultimately, what they’re trying to achieve is matching the giant catalog of stuff, whether they’re tweets or LinkedIn posts or Netflix or movies or YouTube videos or TikTok shorts, like, “Hey, I got a bunch of stuff, and I got a bunch of people. How can I get the right stuff to the right people?”

That’s what they’re trying to do in their little digital brains as best as they can, and then sometimes they do better or worse. And so, I think this is really vibing, says, if you want to do well on LinkedIn, for instance, you want to be swimming with the current instead of against the current, in terms of, “Hey, let me make it easy for you, everybody. This is who I’m for.”

Jason Feifer
Exactly. And you have to do that not just for everybody, but for the algorithm, because the algorithm is not some uncontrollable stroke of luck. The algorithm is trying to understand who your content is for. So, help it do that. And then you can use it to your advantage. I’ll tell you what the LinkedIn algorithm is for, and then we can get back to simple, repeatable and scalable because we’re still on simple.

But the LinkedIn algorithm is looking for three things. Ready? And this is not me making this up. This is multiple conversations with the people who build the algorithm at LinkedIn. So, it is number one, it is looking for knowledge and advice, and that’s their language, knowledge and advice. So, they don’t want life updates. They want knowledge and advice. They want you offering direct information that is useful to an audience.

And then, number two, they want it built off of your specific authority. So, LinkedIn is actually doing this crazy thing where it is looking at your background, because it’s got your resume. It’s looking at your connections. It’s looking at all past content. And it is making an algorithmic assessment of where your authority is, and it will amplify posts that live inside of your authority, and it will not do that for posts outside of your authority.

So, for example, if I write about marketing that is within my authority, LinkedIn sees it, it amplifies it. If, for some reason, I decided to write about anthropology one day, it would look at it, and be like, “This guy doesn’t know anything about anthropology,” and it would not amplify that. So, you really want to stay in your lane.

And then number three is meaningful comments. So, you want to write things that are going to get the kind of people that you are targeting to leave meaningful comments. And by meaningful comments, I mean more than like, “Yes!” or emojis. Like, give people something to have something to say about.

And the algorithm is literally looking for that because that is a sign of validation that it has reached its target audience and that that target audience is interested. And the more in which you’re getting meaningful comments from people, the more in which the post will be amplified to other people like them.

Pete Mockaitis
Well said. Okay, so you said we’re just on simple. Let’s hear repeatable.

Jason Feifer
Yeah, I know there’s a lot here. Okay, so now we have to think about how are you going to show up as that brand. And I came up with this concept. I call it the 5% character, and it goes like this. So, Pete, you are a 100% person, would you agree?

Pete Mockaitis
Yes.

Jason Feifer
But the thing is that most of that is not relevant to the people that we serve, professionally, at least. It’s just not, right? Bring your whole self to work? No. Actually, you have to bring the specific targeted, most relevant version of yourself to work or, certainly, to LinkedIn.

And so, I think what you need to do is assess what 5% of thoughts and expertise of yours is most relevant to that audience? What way in which you engage is most relevant to that audience? Some days I wake up cranky and some days I wake up enthusiastic. Only the enthusiastic version of me is relevant to my audience. The cranky never is, right?

So, once I understand who I am to that audience, what part of me is relevant, then I can start to build what I call the 5% character out of it, which is that I start to ask myself, “What brand attributes are embodied by this 5% character?” So, what does that mean? Really abstract, but really specific. So, 5% character for me, “I am a guy who simplifies complex problems for people in business.”

That’s how I see myself. That’s what I do. That is my offering to the world. I simplify complex problems. And I do that specifically and mostly through understanding communication and people. So, I can tell people how to do storytelling and how to understand the complex problems around them.

So okay, now, I think about my brand attributes, “How do I want people to think of me? How do I want to show up regularly on social media?” And so, I came up with some attributes. Here are some of them. Energetic. You’ve heard that as I talk to you, right? Like, if Pete and I were having coffee, I wouldn’t talk like this because it would be annoying.

But I do talk like this when I’m performing as my 5% character. I’m showing up on a podcast and I’m embodying this version of myself that is simplifying complex problems and is being really helpful to people. So, I have a way in which I’m speaking and that also translates to how I write. My writing is very sharp. It’s poppy. It’s lively. That’s how I want to do it.

And the reason to do this is because once you know who you are on social media, then it becomes much easier to show up like that every day. So, when I sit down every morning to write a post on LinkedIn, I think, “What does the 5% character version of Jason Feifer have to say about this?”

So that is how you become repeatable. And then scalable is when we get to actual content, when we actually start talking about how to make the content.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s really intriguing. A character. It’s a 5% in that it’s within you, so it’s not utterly contrived. So, it is authentic in so far, it is genuinely a part of you, as opposed to something just invented, fabricated. But it is focused, distilled, polished. So, it’s like we have a very nice left foot of Jason that the world is admiring.

Jason Feifer
That’s right. The word I use, and all the words you used were great, but on top of it, intentional. It is intentional. It is the intentional, consistent version of you that, once you define for yourself, you can always show up that way. And that’s the critical distinction. If we don’t define this for ourselves, then we might show up differently every single time. And then we just create more noise.

But we want to create signal. We want to do things on repeat so that eventually people say, “Ah, I remember this person,” “Ah, yes, I want to follow this person,” “Ah, yes, I want to hire and spend money on this person.” This is why if you watch great personal brands, like just think of anybody who you follow, Gary V, you follow Gary V. Gary is so repetitive, so repetitive. And it’s because that works.

Because if Gary said some random new thing every time, or he showed up in some different way on a regular basis, then he would be noise. He wouldn’t be memorable from the first time you saw him to the next time you saw him, and it would just, you’d lose track of him. But because he’s being really repetitive in the way in which he’s talking and the way in which he’s showing up and the topics that he’s hitting, now he’s going to say new things each time, but those things are really all versions of the same thing.

And, by the way, I once, years ago, I’ve known Gary a long time. So, Gary emails me one day, and he’s like, “Hey, you want to get a drink?” And I said, “Sure.” And then a fun thing about Gary is that if you get a drink with Gary, it means that he’s going to give you, like, an incredibly hyper-specific time. He’ll be like, “Be at this place at 8:43, and I’ve got 17 minutes for you.” It’s so crazy, but I’ve talked to lot of people and they’re all like, “Yeah, that’s Gary’s thing.”

So, anyways, I show up and Gary has the camera rolling because he’s always got a camera on him, and he is Gary and he’s very energetic. And then the camera guy’s like, “Yeah, we got what we needed,” and the camera guy wanders away, and then Gary changes. And then he becomes, not a completely different person, but a more complex person.

He’s not talking quite like that. He has a softer tone. He’s slower. He’s more thoughtful. We’re having back and forth. He’s more nuanced, right? Like, that is actually the moment in which I realized, “Oh, Gary is playing a character named Gary. Like, when I see him on social media, he’s playing a character named Gary Vaynerchuk.”

But then when the cameras are off, he becomes actual Gary Vaynerchuk. And the character Gary Vaynerchuk is inside of that real Gary Vaynerchuk, but it’s just one thing that he’s activating every single time. And that’s being intentional.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, that’s interesting. And, well, now I’m thinking, so you and I both know and love and respect Pat Flynn. And so, I have watched lots of his content, had him on the show a few times, met him at a couple conferences, hung out and got some burritos.

Jason Feifer
Nice.

Pete Mockaitis
And my experience of Pat, and people will say this about famous people, in general, like as a positive, virtuous attributes, it’s like, “Boy, you know what? It sure seems like Pat’s just the same sweet, generous, thoughtful, person in all of his content as he is in person.” And so, I mean, that seems to be the case, and that seems to be a positive. So, to what extent is that contrast with a Gary V. and square with your overall message here?

Jason Feifer
So, everyone is going to make different decisions about how much of their whole version of self they will show to others and in what context and when. And it’s true, Pat is extremely consistent. The Pat that you see on camera is pretty much the same Pat as if you’re talking to him in real life. But, you know, Pat’s a more complex person than what you see on camera. Everybody is. How could you not?

Nobody would want to be friends with or be married to a person who is as simple in real life as they are on camera. So, Pat has done a great job, because he’s such a good content creator, of developing a focused version of himself that is truly appealing and digestible and scalable, and that is absolutely him. But is still just a part of him. It’s still just a part of him.
Pete Mockaitis
Oh, sure. I mean, I haven’t like, you know, been in his house for a week.

Jason Feifer
Yeah, right, right, right. And that’s the thing to remember, right? So, I’ve seen Pat in two interesting, different professional contexts, which is that, number one, we’ve worked together on a bunch of smart passive income stuff. But then also I took my kid to his Pokemon conference. And, you know, it’s interesting how it’s a version. It’s the same version of Pat, but when we’re doing business, he only talks about Pokemon in the context of lessons of content creation.

And when he’s doing Pokemon, he almost never really talks about business, unless he’s using it to help explain his own journey, “I did this and I did this and then I discovered this.” And so, he’s being thoughtful about how to utilize these different arenas of knowledge to be most relevant to the audience that he’s speaking to. And that, I think, is a critical part of this.

We all know lots of things, but we have to make sure that the things that we know are delivered in a way that are going to be most relevant and helpful to the audience in which we’re serving. And we have to think of everything and everybody. “Who am I speaking to right now? What do they need from me right now? What is going to be most relevant to them?” And so, this is what I mean.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And I think, in a way, all of us humans are pretty much doing this all of the time as we engage with different people in different contexts. And so, what we’re doing here is we’re just really clarifying, in your digital realm, if you want to show up in a particular way that is efficacious, this is what it’s about, and it requires a bit more proactive conscious thought than what we do subconsciously that, “I show up differently at Catholic mass than I do at my child’s friend’s birthday party.” We’re doing a different thing with different people for different purposes.

Jason Feifer
And it is easier to do that. I really like the way that you just framed that because what I am describing with the 5% character is, indeed, a version of what we do all the time. But the reason it’s important to think about it is because the context in which you are in will help guide the version of you that you should be.

Because you are in a very specific setting, you are surrounded by people who are also part of that setting, it is easier to fall into the right version of yourself that’s appropriate for that time. It is harder to do that on social media because it’s chaos, it’s noise. You’re seeing everybody do everything. And so, you’re going to go on, you’re going to see…

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. So, you think it’s fine to do that. That’s a great point. Because we see everything, you may think it’s fine to do everything, but, in real life, we don’t get those cues. It’s like nobody is grunting and high-fiving at like a professional business luncheon, the way they are at a gym, you know. And yet, in a social media world, you see it all. And so, you might take the cue, it’s like, “Oh, it’s okay to just do whatever here.”

Jason Feifer
“Do whatever. I’ll just say it, yeah, say anything. Oh, they’re talking about this stuff over there. Maybe I should join that conversation.” No, do not show up just as yourself. The more in which you can think of yourself as a product in a marketplace, like when we’re engaging in a personal brand space, you are engaging in a marketplace of ideas in the same way that Old Spice is engaging in a marketplace of deodorants.

You are engaging in a marketplace of ideas and you have to be a product, and the product does not change. You don’t take Old Spice deodorant and put it next to orange juice and it becomes orange juice. It doesn’t. It always is Old Spice. And you always have to be that solid, too.

So, the more in which you think, “This is every day how I show up. This is how I talk. This is how I do not talk. This is what I talk about. This is what I do not talk about,” the more in which you will create that signal, and you will not be tempted to just morph into whatever you see.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, so simple, repeatable, scalable. Lovely. And so, you mentioned a little bit about what LinkedIn is looking for already. Any additional comments there?

Jason Feifer

Yeah, well, so scalable is really about how to write content. And so, let’s just touch on that briefly, which is, once we’ve decided how we’re going to show up, then we have to know how to communicate on LinkedIn. And here’s the thing to know. Most people make the mistake of writing very dense or complicated openings or there’s a lot of throat-clearing.

You’ll find people who are writing like, “Last week I was thinking about…” Nobody cares last week what you were thinking about, right? That doesn’t matter. So instead, you have to always remember what I said about the first question, people are asking, “Is this for me? Is this not for me?” The first things that they see from you have to start addressing that.

So, I challenge you to do the following things in every post. Number one, visual. Find a compelling visual, maybe even put a caption on top of that visual with some text that’s going to draw some people in. For example, I write a lot about marketing on LinkedIn. And so, I would find, for example, a funny ad that Uber created.

And then I’m not just posting the ad, I’m going to write a little caption on top of that ad in the graphic that I’m uploading to LinkedIn, because that’s the first thing people are going to see. The thing that’s going to stop the scroll is actually the visual. So, they’re going to see the visual and then they’re going to wonder what you have to say about it.

And it could be a visual of you. It could be just a really compelling photo. It could be an interesting chart, but you got to have some context onto that chart. It could be anything, but you got to have something. And then the next thing that you want to write is that you want to write some language that signals who this post is for. And then after that, you want to signal the value that is to come. That’s what you want to do.

So, for example, I just told you like I wrote this post just two days ago or something – I’m to pull it up as we’re talking – in which I wrote about an Uber commercial that was really funny. So, what it is, I grabbed the video and I put this caption on top of it, and the caption said, “Uber’s ad was so good, it won an Emmy.” That’s the caption. Now, don’t you immediately want to see the ad, “Wow so good, it won an Emmy? Let’s see.”

Now, here’s my first line. This is what I wrote. This is all anybody sees, because LinkedIn will cut off after the first, like, so many characters. So, this is all anybody sees. It’s got to be good enough that people want to click more and read more. This has got to be compelling. This has got to drive people to take an action. And that action is, here’s what I wrote, I wrote, “Now this is how to speak to young people and turn them into customers.”

So, what have I done? Now, “This is how to speak to young people.” That is now signaling to anybody who is in a business where they need to engage young consumers, young employees, anybody, anybody who’s worried about thinking about that, that this is somehow relevant to them. And then I say, “And turn them into customers.”

At which point I am now promising that the next thing you’re going to read is going to help explain that. I’m going to pay off on that promise. And then if you open it up, that’s exactly what I do. What I do is I introduce an idea, and that idea is stop trying to be your audience, start respecting your audience. And it’s the difference in how Uber was talking to that young audience.

So, this is the language. I call this the three-hook structure, right? So, the first hook is the visual. The second hook is telling who this is for. And then the third hook is what is the value to come. And you do that all in a really nice and fluid way. And you try to be as punchy and simple in your language as possible and just start to experiment and you’ll see what people engage with. Try different formats. And, eventually, you will start to see your own patterns of what your specific audience wants from you.

Pete Mockaitis
And when you talk about the hook, it’s funny, it’s almost kind of like standard issue is like the first sentence, it just has a hook. It’s like, “What? Tell me more. What’s going on?”

But sometimes, they’re clearly written by AI often, it’s like, in a bad way. Like, there’s not actually any substance to back it up. It’s, like, “Yesterday, I quit my job,” or something, or, “I had to fire someone today.” It’s like, “What? Why? Tell me more.” You know, it’s like you can tell what they’re going for. And then, often, you kind of wonder, it’s like, “Well, did you really? Or are you just like making stuff up to try to get me to read your LinkedIn post here?”

Jason Feifer
Totally. Totally. Or, people will do like, “Now this is what teamwork looks like,” and it’s a photo of their team. And that’s great. Good for your team. But there’s no reason for me to click and learn more about that, because you’re not promising anything. That’s what teamwork looks like? I don’t care. Or, a lot of people will also just get too in the weeds.

I mean, who was I just talking to? Somebody in logistics, and they want to position themselves as an authority in logistics. And they showed me some of their posts, and I was like, “You know what? I literally don’t understand the language that you’re speaking right now. It’s full of acronyms and it just feels dense. It just feels dense.”

The best thing that you can do as a writer, as a creator of any kind of content is just look at it through the lens of someone who is just stumbling upon it. Like, take yourself out of you, and imagine me or Pete, just coming across this thing and looking at it. Are we interested? Are we going to spend the time? Or is this too dense and it’s too complicated? And if so, then simplify it so that it makes us stop and read.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Any other thoughts on what LinkedIn is looking for?

Jason Feifer
Well, let me tell you the number one frustration that people in my world, which is to say people who are trying to reach tons of people on LinkedIn have, and that is that the LinkedIn algorithm is constantly changing, and it is. And everyone always complains it’s harder and harder to reach people on LinkedIn. And I’ve put this to LinkedIn.

And their answer, I think, is really instructive, especially for people who are listening to this show. Because what they’re saying is they don’t actually want things to go viral on LinkedIn. And they don’t, actually, want people to be trying to reach the masses on LinkedIn. What they want is for people to use LinkedIn to find economic opportunity. That’s the language they always use, economic opportunity.

Which is to say, and I was like, “Give me an example.” And Dan Roth, who’s the editor in chief of LinkedIn was talking to us. He’s like, “I was just talking to this nurse, and she’s wanted to shift into this specific position at a hospital or something. And so, she started posting kind of insights into best management practices inside of healthcare or something. And then somebody at another hospital saw that and reached out and hired her because of that.”

He’s like, “That’s success. That’s what we’re looking for.” Which is to say, you don’t have to reach tons of people. You just have to reach the right people, as I said at the very beginning, and don’t get discouraged if your numbers are small.

Because if what you just want is more economic opportunity, well, then all you really need to know is who do you want to reach? And then how do you show them, don’t tell them, show them that you are an authority that they should take seriously, that you are great talent that they cannot overlook?

This is a long game. You have to have a lot of patience with it. You have to take it very seriously. You have to be consistent. But, over time, if you do it, people will find you. And that’s the point.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, and then your third pillar there was how to create great content. We’ve hit a couple of those bits. Anything else you want to make sure to highlight?

Jason Feifer

Yeah, there’s one other thing, which is let me tell you my number one tip for content idea generation. People always ask, “How do you get your ideas? How are you writing every day? What do have to say?” A couple of things to know.

Number one, I think that the best content comes from real life and will come up in real life, which is to say that I just use the Notes app on my phone. And any time that this little “Boop!” goes off in my head, which says, “Interesting!” I don’t let it pass me by. I write it down. I capture it in real time.

And what I am really doing is I am creating an ever-filling backlog of content ideas. Because if you sit down to write a LinkedIn post, you will have no idea what to write about. But if you just start capturing interesting things, just think about interesting things at work, “What problems did you recently solve? What came up in some meeting and you’re like, ‘Oh, that was a good way of thinking about that.’ Or, ‘This is a thing that I did and it worked really well.’”

Like, whatever. You’re not giving away confidential information. But like what are you seeing? What’s coming up? What did you just do to solve that problem that actually is based on something that you do all the time? “You know, the way that I did that is that I always first look at this. And if I look at this first, that it usually gives me a good direction.” Great. That little framework, that thing that you, that is content. So, constantly be capturing those things so that you can then sit down and produce that content.

And then the second thing I want to share is that it doesn’t have to be new every single day forever. So, you might write a post and it does okay. And then give it like a month, and now write another version of that same post. It was a good idea. Maybe you can do it better. Maybe you can find another more compelling way to do it. Maybe you wrote a post and you realize, “Actually, this is kind of like two posts. Like, I have two ideas here.”

So, I am always going back to my old material and just sort of like tweaking it or updating it or doing something new. So, the more in which you do this, the more material you have, number one, in your Notes app on your phone, and then, number two, on LinkedIn, and then it starts to become much easier and you start to get into a flow and a rhythm. So, you need to create some systems so that you can do it.

And then, actually, Pete, sorry, one more thing. I keep promising that this is the only thing that I have and that I just keep adding one more. But final thing is you might be wondering “How often should you post?” And I told you I post every day, Monday through Friday. Don’t do that to start. Don’t do that. You’ll get overwhelmed and you’ll never do anything.

Instead, I challenge you, “What is the minimum amount that you can definitely commit to?” or the maximum amount, I suppose, any amount, just commit to some amount. So maybe it is once every two weeks. Fine. Once every two weeks, do it once every two weeks. Pick it every other Monday, you’re going to write a LinkedIn post. You can spend two weeks thinking about it.

And then, once you’ve got that regularly, once you feel like you’re in a real flow once every two weeks, see if you can add another. Now, can you do it once a week? Great. Now get comfortable with that. So, you never want to take, if you try to do this too often, you will not do it at all. The more important thing to do is to just be building the habit over time. You’ll get better at it. It’ll become easier.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Jason, are there any tools or resources or experts or websites or newsletters or just things to check out to get ever better at this LinkedIn game?

Jason Feifer
Absolutely. Well, let me tell you about my newsletter. It is not specifically about LinkedIn, but it is very much about simplifying complex problems and communication. I share a lot of great communication tips on there, and it is called “One Thing Better,” each week, one way to be more successful and satisfied and build a career or company that you love. And you can find that by going to the web address, OneThingBetter.email.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thanks. Well, now could we hear a favorite quote?

Jason Feifer
Malcolm Gladwell, bestselling author Malcolm Gladwell, said this to me. He said, “Self-conceptions are powerfully limiting.”

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Jason Feifer
The last thing that I just was obsessed with was The Three Body Problem, the full trilogy. I could not recommend it more strongly. I think about it all the time. It is like a big hypothesis about the grand scheme of the universe, and I just adored it. So, The Three Body Problem.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks lucky to be awesome at their jobs?

Jason Feifer
The most valuable thing that you can do is to be constantly seeking the thing that is available to you that nobody is asking you to do.

We spend so much time at our jobs, doing the things that people ask us to do, and that’s fine. But if that’s all you do, then you are only qualified to do the thing you’re already doing. But to do the thing that nobody’s asking you to do.

That is actually where growth happens, because that’s where discovery happens. That’s where new opportunities come from. That’s where new skills are learned. That’s where new connections are made. So, I would step back and ask, “What is available to you,” in the abstract, “available to you because you could pursue it; available to you because you could make a phone call or you could go to a website, anything? What is available to you that nobody is asking you to do?”

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Jason, thank you.

Jason Feifer
Thank you. I am so glad that you impulse invited me onto the show.

1109: How to Find Great Mentors and Build Your Legacy with Dr. Deborah Heiser

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Dr. Deborah Heiser discusses how and why to find mentors from all directions.

You’ll Learn

  1. The fundamental human need that mentorship fulfills
  2. Why most struggle to find mentors—and the simple fix
  3. The unlikely places where you can find more mentors

About Deborah

Dr. Deborah Heiser (Ph.D.) is an applied developmental psychologist, the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, and author of The Mentorship Edge: Creating Maximum Impact Through Lateral and Hierarchical Mentoring. She is a TEDx speaker, member of Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, expert contributor to Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Deborah Heiser Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Debra, welcome.

Deborah Heiser
Thanks for having me. I’m delighted to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to chat about mentorship, and I understand that you currently have a 21-year-old mentor. What’s the story here?

Deborah Heiser
So, I am 57. I’m a Gen Xer. And I decided that I wanted to try out social media for the next big thing that I’m working on, and to get some word out there. So, I asked if this person, who’s 21, could mentor me. I didn’t say, “Hey, can you be my mentor?”

But we talked. And he agreed. And so, he’s been mentoring me for two and a half months now. And it’s amazing to be in the position of a mentee. It made me have a whole new perspective.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s super. Well, could you share with us what’s a social media insight you’ve picked up from this 21-year-old phenom?

Deborah Heiser
That it is not as easy as it looks, that there’s a lot of work that goes into it. There’s a lot of thought that has to go into it. Even the things that are supposed to look really completely off the cuff, they’re generally not. So that was really a new insight for me.

Pete Mockaitis
Understood. Thank you. Yeah, I think I’d heard Mr. Beast, a top Youtuber, say, “People are surprised all the time when they learn just how much tremendous work and effort goes into these videos. We’re not just a bunch of folks goofing around. There’s huge sets and teams and productions.”

Deborah Heiser
You know, it wasn’t just the work, right? I had to learn from him the work. I had to learn the culture. So, the very first livestream he put me on TikTok, I was getting all of these comments that were coming into the feed, like, “UNC” was one of them. I was thinking the person was talking about the university. No, it’s “unc.” It means I’m old and outdated.

So, it was really funny to learn about how people perceived me in the Gen Z population, and how I needed to learn the culture and learn what was relevant to people that were outside of the Gen X age group.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, shucks. Well, you know what, I guess I’m learning something too. I thought “unc,” I knew it was short for uncle, and it meant that this person is older, but I had sort of hoped and thought it might’ve had affectionate connotations, but you’re telling me it doesn’t, okay.

Deborah Heiser
No. And I learned that without knowing that. He had to explain that to me. And so, that was kind of funny.

Pete Mockaitis
I just remember Bryan Johnson is often called the “Immortal Unc” and I thought that was endearing, but I guess it’s not. Okay, I’m learning. Well, so I think that’s a nice little lesson in terms of mentorship, in terms of the things maybe you thought you know, maybe you don’t. And you get that wisdom from different perspectives and engaging in different kinds of folks.

So, you’ve been in this game for a while. We got the book, The Mentorship Edge, which we’re chatting about. You are the CEO and founder of The Mentor Project. So, could you maybe kick us off with anything that’s particularly striking or surprising for folks when you’re teaching about mentorship and they go, “Whoa, seriously, for real?”

Deborah Heiser
Everyone is a mentor and you just don’t realize it. So, most people think that mentorship is for work and it can be and is, and that’s a great place to look for mentorship or to become a mentor. But mentorship is something that’s in our families that we’ve been doing forever. If you subscribe to any religion, that’s passed down through mentorship, centuries.

We’re never going to remember Bob the accountant, but we remember what religion and the traditions and the values that we have in our family that get passed down. And we often take that for granted, but that’s mentorship, all of that is. The family traditions at every holiday that you engage in, that’s mentorship.

So, we’re doing all of this and we just don’t give credit to the grandmas and grandpas out there who are doing this every day, or to ourselves when we say, “This value means something to me. I’m going to pass it on.” So that’s a big surprise to a lot of people. They think that mentorship is saved for someone with an advanced degree or a specific title, and, really, it’s not. Everybody is always mentoring and they’re being mentored and we just don’t always realize that.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, we’re always mentoring and we’re always being mentored, and you mentioned some of those contexts. What exactly is your definition for mentorship then?

Deborah Heiser
Mentorship actually has five components to it. So, it has to start with the developmental… I just want to say that we’re developmentally, just like walking and talking is a developmental life stage. We are developmentally programmed to want to give back. And so we are, it’s like a developmental milestone. So, it’s something that we should be expecting to do.

So, it first starts with generativity. And generativity is where we have a desire to give a bit of ourselves to somebody else without expecting anything in return. We’re all doing that. If a friend calls and says, “Hey, can I pick your brain?” You don’t say, “Buzz off.” You say, “Of course.” We’re always doing this.

And the reason we do this, engage in generativity, is because we like that a little piece of us lives on in somebody else. We like that we’re valued enough, or something that we value is valued enough, that somebody else wants to carry that.

The next thing it needs is intrinsic motivation. So, if I’m being paid to mentor, I’m not a mentor. You have to be doing it simply because you want to do it. And the example I give is if I said, “Hey, Pete, would you like to go volunteer at a soup kitchen, giving out food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people?” You might say, “Yes.”

Now imagine you’re on your way to the soup kitchen to deliver food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people, and I say, “Hey, Pete, take a left. I want you to go to Starbucks and volunteer your time there instead.” Well, that’s going to have a whole different feeling, even though you’re giving food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people for free.

And that’s what we need with mentoring. And we do this all the time. We’re all very helpful to others. We want to be, we like it, we get a good feeling from it. We also need to have a meaningful connection. So, a lot of people will say to me, “Oh, my gosh, I have this toxic mentor, the person is horrible. How do I deal with it?” But that’s not a mentor. You have to like the person. They have to like you. It’s kind of like a friend.

If you have some friend who is mean to you, they’re not your friend. So, you need that meaningful connection. You also need trust. So, Pete, if you were a boss of mine and I had an issue where I didn’t know how to do something at work, I might wonder if I could go to you and say, “Hey, I don’t know what I’m doing. Can you guide me through this?” Because I might think, “Wow, he’s going to find out I don’t know what I’m doing and he’ll never give me a raise or a promotion.”

So, likewise, if I was your mentee and you said, “I’m not going to share my knowledge and expertise with her. She’s going to go start her own company with that.” You have to trust me, but that has to go in both directions. And, finally, there has to be a goal. A lot of people think, “I’m just going to meet with somebody for an hour every week, and I’m just going to meet with them, and somehow I’ll get mentorship.”

Mentorship is an exchange of something with a goal. So, it’d be like, “Can you tell me the lay of the land at work?” or, “I’m a hardware engineer. Can your software engineer help me solve a problem that I need to have that involved with it?” It’s combining that. As long as it has all five of those, it’s mentorship. If it’s missing one, it’s not. It’s like baking brownies without sugar. It’ll look like it, but won’t taste like it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so understood, those are the components that exist within that. And so, I’m hearing you that those five ingredients can be present in all sorts of relationships, interactions, as opposed to formal career professional, “I want to sharpen my skills in digital advertising, whatever, exchanges.”

Deborah Heiser
It can be in all of those. I’ll give you an example. Irene Yachbes, she worked for NASA. She pushed the launch button on the mission to Mercury. She’s an aerospace engineer. She’s smart. She went to work for IBM, and she walked in and she said it was like going to the first day of middle school, “Who do you eat with? Where do you go? What do you do?”

So, this very smart person was looking for, “I don’t even know where the bathroom is here.” And so, she said, “I just need to know the lay of the land here.” And so, somebody at her office was giving a talk in her first week, and said, “If anybody would like a mentor, reach out to me.”

So, Irene called me and she said, “I can’t reach out to her. I’m too intimidated. I’m brand new here.” And I was like, “What are you talking about? Just email her.” And she did, and she said, “I just need to know the lay of the land. Can you help me out with that?” And the person said, “Yes.” They met for 15 minutes and that led to a four-year mentorship.

So that does apply. The person liked Irene, Irene liked her. It ended up that all five of those components were met. We just don’t think about those components when we’re reaching out to somebody. But she didn’t say to her, “Hey, mentor me.” She came with a specific goal.

Pete Mockaitis
Understood. And I think that just going through those ingredients, I think, might spark some ideas for people here, it’s like, “Hey, you know what? I’ve got a sense of a meaningful connection and trust with this person who knows some stuff that I need to know. Why the heck don’t I just go ahead and reach out?”

Deborah Heiser
Yeah, it’s the same as when we make friends. You know you don’t have to go through your thing, and say, “Does that person share my values?” No, you could have 10 people that cross your path, and there’s one that you say, “Ooh, I like that person. I’m going to hang out with that person.”

If you were to dissect that, you’d find out that you have criteria that you’re checking off to see if it matched for that. So that’s all that I’m saying with this checklist that is for mentoring.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Now you’ve said that about half of young professionals say they feel kind of lost in their careers. What do we think is behind this and how does mentoring play in?

Deborah Heiser
I think that most people that I’ve talked to say they’re intimidated and they think that mentoring is only hierarchical. They have also said to me that they are looking for somebody who’s going to open the doors and lift them up into the new job they want. That’s too vague. If I said to somebody, “I want you to solve all the problems that I don’t even know I have,” there’s an issue.

So, people come to me and they’ll say, “Can you be my mentor?” And I’ll say, “Sure, what in? How? What would you like me to help you with?” And they say, “I don’t know.” And then I have to say, “Well, okay, what are some of your goals?” “I’m not sure.” And so, all I say to people who are starting out is have a tiny ask, one small ask.

So, if somebody like Irene said, “Can you show me the lay of the land?” A person could say yes or no. And that’s an accomplishable goal. And within that very first moment, you can determine, “Is this somebody I could mentor or be mentored by?” You can feel each other out. So, start with something super, super small.

You could ask a person, “Hey, I would love to learn an aspect of the job that you do in advertising. I think that I could learn from you. Can I just ask you a few questions?” And you just have something that could take maybe five minutes, and then you can take it from there. That person may or may not be the person that’s best for you.

And the other thing is I tell people is you do not have to look hierarchically up the ladder. That’s very limited. You only have a certain number of people who are directly above you. But if you look to your left and to your right, you have countless people who can help you. And if I look at all of the cases of the people who are like famous lateral mentors, that’s the founding fathers of the United States. Nobody was the boss.

Every entrepreneur who starts a company, they can’t look up. They have to look to their left or to their right. Steve Jobs looked to Steve Wozniak as a lateral mentor. All of these cases are people who didn’t look hierarchically for help. So, anybody who’s starting out, if you’re feeling vulnerable, insecure, look to your left or to your right, somebody in a different department.

And you can ask them questions. You can say, “Hey, from an outside perspective, what do you see is a path for me and my department? Do you have any tips or pointers for working within my department in this new job that I have?” That’s something that people can do very easily. And I’ll give you one more, quick example.

I was speaking with an Iowa federal judge, and he was saying, “Look, judges can’t be vulnerable. You can’t say, ‘Hey, I don’t know how to handle that case. Like, I don’t know what to do.’ That’s not going to work well.” So lateral mentoring was something that was really important to this group of federal judges.

So, what they did was they put in an informal lunch and everybody got to come in and sit next to somebody. So, somebody was able to say, “Hey, Bob, you handled that case. How did you do that?” Now, that’s not a person saying, “I don’t know what I’m doing.” That’s a person saying, “How did you handle something?” And then that person was able to start without showing a vulnerability, but they saw an incredible increase in mentorship that was happening laterally because it removed that vulnerability.

So, if you’re starting out, think about the power that is to the left or to the right of you where you’re not worried about somebody feeling like you’re stepping on their toes, they’re competing for your job, they’re not competing for a promotion from you. They’re going to share very readily with you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that a lot. And I’m thinking now about my podcast mastermind group, and they’re wonderful, they’ve all been guests on the show. And it’s interesting about the lateral piece is that I wouldn’t say any of us is like the top dog, you know? It’s sort of like it’s clear that all of us have our respective strengths and areas where we’re excelling and others can learn from each other there.

And it’s really quite lovely because, in the course of sharing, we discover stuff. It’s like, “Hey, you seem to know a lot about how these advertising is working. And you seem to have a really engaged growing program over here.” And we’re all able to share the goodies.

And especially, over time, when you talk about trust, you realize just how much of our hangups are emotionally-driven and irrational. It’s like, “Oh, I should maybe just chill out about that. Oh, okay. I’ll just stop worrying and give it a shot. How about that?” So many breakthroughs boil down to that.

Deborah Heiser
Absolutely. I love the example that you brought up because so many of us join groups. There are people who join book clubs. They join. We’re all joiners, right? People join all kinds of things. That’s a great place to find mentorship. Most of us think that if we’re in the job, we have to find our mentor in our job.

But I’m going to give you a quick example of a workplace where somebody who was new at their job came in and they said, “Uh-oh,” and they got mentorship. So, this guy, Steve, was at his job and he had a boss who gave him an impossible task with a super short deadline. And Steve didn’t know what he was doing. But Steve was like, “I got it,” when the boss came in and said, “Hey, can you get this done?”

So, the boss came in a couple of days later and was like, “Steve, you haven’t made any progress.” And Steve was like, “Don’t you worry. I got it. I got it.” He was afraid he was going to get fired. So, he didn’t ever tell his boss, “I don’t know what I’m doing.” When I talk to people, everybody’s been there at some point where you’re like, “Okay, I can do this.”

So, what happened was, the next day the boss came in, he’s like, “Listen, you either got this or you don’t. What’s the deal here?” So, Steve said, “I told you I got it. I do.” The boss left, and he immediately called his friend, Steve. And he’s like, “Steve, can you help me? I don’t know what I’m doing. I know that you know this different kind of engineering than I know. Can you come in and help?” And so, Steve said, “Yeah, I’ll come in after work. I got to finish my job. And then I’ll come in and help you.”

So, in he comes, everybody is gone in the workplace, but he comes in and they work together. And Steve’s like, “Oh, my gosh. Thank you, Steve, for coming. This is so helpful. I’m making progress here. Keep teaching me what you know.” So, they made a lot of progress.

The boss comes in the next day, and he’s like, “Steve, I can’t believe all the progress you made.” And he said, “I told you I knew what I was doing.” And long story short, they worked together and the project gets done a week earlier than expected.

And the boss came and said, “I can’t believe you did this a week earlier than was expected.” That job was Atari. The boss was Al Alcorn, the engineer that didn’t know what he was doing was Steve Jobs, and the person who helped him was Steve Wozniak. That very first project was Breakout, the first video game. And that was lateral mentoring.

Steve didn’t feel comfortable in his own job. He was brand new. He thought he was going to get fired if he didn’t do this. So, he called his friend, Steve, who worked in a completely different area. And that was lateral mentoring. And so, when you’re in the workplace, you do not have to think of the workplace as your only way to find a solution to what you need or the mentoring that you need to get.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that a lot. Thank you. So, let’s hear on the other side of things, you talked about generativity, and that is just sort of a human developmental thing. I don’t know if there’s a particular age or years in the career or threshold in which this kind of kicks into higher gear, but tell us a bit about that and where to proceed with it.

Deborah Heiser
So, generativity is a life stage just like walking, any physical life stage that we have. And it kicks in specifically at its highest point in midlife. So, between 40 and 65, you should really see people ramping up. You’ll see things like people say, “I’m going to start a blog,” “I’m going to start a podcast,” because that’s a form of mentorship. It’s a modern form of mentorship. So, you, Pete, are mentoring right now in a modern way.

So, people will start to kick in to doing that. They get an itch to give back. And so those are some of the ways that we see people doing that in midlife. But the reason we have that is because you reach midlife, all prior to midlife, you’ve had boxes to check off that other people put in front of you, “Finish school,” “Maybe go to college,” “Get a house,” “Buy a car,” “Get married,” “Have a family,” “Have a career,” “Get advanced in your career,” “Become an expert in something.”

All of these things are outside, external kind of boxes that we check. Then midlife hits and you’re like, “Huh, I get to pick my own boxes. What am I going to check?” And that’s when it hits us, and we say, “Do I matter in the world? What’s my footprint doing? How deep is it? And what do I want that footprint to look like?”

And it’s the first moment that we have the time to do that and we have the bandwidth to do this. So that’s why there’s a pretty big window for that. So, you could be 40, and say, “I am not there. I’m really busy.” It could be between 40 and 65 that it really hits for people. And that’s when people are looking to give back their expertise, their values, their traditions, their usefulness to others.

It makes them feel relevant. It makes them feel useful. It makes them feel like they matter in the world, like they didn’t just take up space. And so, that’s what generativity is all about. So, if you’re looking at somebody in midlife, that is a great person to look to, to mentor you, because they’re probably looking to mentor someone.

Pete Mockaitis
And if we are in that stage and we’re feeling those things, what do you recommend we go do?

Deborah Heiser
That you look within yourself and say, “What is it that I think is important to me?” Some people will say, “Well, it’s the things that are in my personal life.” Some people will say, “I want to pass on the traditions and values that I hold dear in my family.” And that could be religion, that could be your traditions that are in your family. It could be values.

It could be that you say, “I want to be remembered or known for this expertise that I had.” So, whatever that is, it could be different for every single person. And that expertise is all you have to tap into. And most people think, “Well, it has to be something really profound.” And it’s not. It’s the little things that we do.

So, the very first thing I say to people is show up. Just show up in places because that’s your opportunity to find out what you’d like to give back. And showing up is like the first beginning step of mentorship. So, you know, that can be a value. If someone is in need and they’re in the hospital, show up, go visit them. That’s a form of saying, ‘You matter, I care for you.”

If you make an appointment on somebody’s calendar, show up. If you’re going to go to a funeral, show up. All of these things that maybe we say to ourselves, “I don’t know if it really matters.” It does. That’s the very first thing that you can do that costs nothing and doesn’t require you to have a degree or anything else. It’s just showing up. And then that’s going to be the first step of making the mentorship happen.

Pete Mockaitis
And what’s next?

Deborah Heiser
So, once you’ve showed up, the next thing is that you want to see if you make a connection with somebody. Is there somebody who you can see who wants what you have? So, if I have an expertise in something, and I go to give it to you, let’s say my expertise is in, I don’t know, crocheting. I’m a master crocheter and I say, “Hey, Pete, I’d like to teach you how to crochet,” and you have no interest in crocheting. Well, that first step is, “Okay, we don’t have it.”

But if I meet somebody else and they say, “I’ve always been wanting to learn how to crochet,” then there we go. It’s the same with if you go into work and you’re looking for somebody or showing up to things, you go onto the big Zoom, you’re at the water cooler, you’re at the lunch, you’re at the grand rounds, if you’re in a hospital, wherever you are, you’re showing up.

Who is it that looks like they’re receptive to what you need? And then you’re basically finding that person, “Hey, does this interest you? No? Okay, next. Who’s out there looking for that?” It’s the same as when you’re podcasting and you’re putting something out there. Not everybody is going to resonate, but those that do and they say, “I’m going to come back over and over again.” Those are your meaningful connections.

So, the next step is really connecting with people, “Who, out here, is looking for what I have?” It’s developing the trust by continuing to show up and it’s engaging with that individual to see if you can make change for them.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, and it really is beautiful. As I’m just imagining this and I’m reflecting on experiences I’ve had, it really is a beautiful, human, heartfelt, deep, emotional, good thing. You know, it’s like right up there. And I’m thinking about, I’ve heard in academic scholarship circles, and maybe you can comment on this, good doctor.

That sometimes, when folks retire, a beautiful gift they receive is sort of like the grand tree that shows their mentees, protegees, doctoral candidates that they brought up, who in turn brought up the next generation and the next generation. You can just sort of see the lineage flowing through and rippling out as just like a top retirement gift for folks in that zone.

I’ve heard of this as a thing that has happened on multiple occasions. So, it was like, that sounds like about the top thing you would want at your retirement party.

Deborah Heiser

Yes. We all want to feel a sense of legacy, and we start to build our legacy as early as we can think. We’re building how we’re going to be remembered by others. And that tree that you’re talking about is incredibly important. So, the term legacy tree was coined by Bob Lefkowitz. He’s a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry from 2012.

And he published, he wanted to know, “Why am I a Nobel Prize winner and not somebody else?” He was like, “I was born in the Bronx. What made me stand out from anybody else? I’m not smarter than other people. What is it?” So, he decided to make a legacy tree for himself that showed all the mentors above him, those that were on his level, and the mentees, very few, because most of us don’t even realize when we’re mentoring, that were below him. And he published it in a journal.

And two weeks later, he went to a conference, and somebody came up to him and he said, “Hey, Bob, I’m six degrees Lefkowitz.” And he was like, “What are you talking about?” And the guy said, “Hey, there are five people who’ve worked between you and me. And here I am continuing the work that you started.” Bob said, “What are you talking about? Tell me about your work.”

He told him about his work, and he was able to hear his own words spoken by this person he had never met, and he was able to see how his work had snowballed out six degrees away from him. And he said he’d never felt more profound emotion than the birth of his children and getting married than at that moment because he knew that he mattered and he knew he had a legacy.

So that academic legacy, the tree that you talk about, that’s what we’re trying to build. And if we are able to create our own legacy trees, we’re able to see what our impact is and see what our legacy actually is. And that’s very meaningful to us. Most of us aren’t able to harness that.

It’s kind of like when you donate and you don’t remember you donated anything until tax time and you have to like go through your tax return and say, “Oh, yeah, I know I donated this.” We forget all of the good things that we do, all the volunteering, all the philanthropy, all of the mentoring that we do throughout the year. And it just gets kind of folded into our everyday life.

So, if we can acknowledge the moments that we mentor, or we acknowledge the moments that we’ve been mentored and we thank the people that have mentored us, it makes us do it more and it ties it back to legacy so that we then can feel our impact. We can actually get that feeling that we want that’s kind of like the Grinch whose heart grew three times in size. That’s how we feel when we start to, you know, really acknowledge our legacy.

Pete Mockaitis
Ooh, yeah, you know, you’re right. That profound emotional thing, you’re bringing me back. This was years ago, but I remember when I was in college, I had a couple buddies and we started an accountability group where we just sort of challenged each other on a weekly regular basis, “Hey, did you do those things that you talked about?”

And in so doing, we built some really good habits and saw some cool results. And of them, his name is Jeremy, and I said, “You know what? I know Nike doesn’t recruit on our campus, but, like, you should just go for it and apply for an internship.” And so, he did, and he’s still working there. It’s a long career. Nike’s loving it.

And then I visited him out there in Oregon and I met people that he had formed another accountability group with. And I’d written down some of the principles that we were operating with. And so, they, too, were seeing really cool results and good habits and things in their world. And it really was tremendously powerful.

Like, “Huh, like some stuff I did has impacted Jeremy,” who is now in Oregon, partially because I said go for that internship. And then here’s more people that Jeremy is in the group with seeing awesome things. And it is among the top meaningful, feel good, emotional vibes around.

Deborah Heiser
It sure is because you know you mattered. And we need to know we mattered. That’s why, if we look at social media, those likes mean something to us. We need to feel like we matter. So even if those are throwaway things in certain things, in certain areas, it shows our craving for mattering, for relevancy, all of that.

So, what you just described is what we’re seeking from work. We want work validation. We want all of that. That all ties in together to how our emotions are. And just the acknowledging some of it, at least allows us. Like, you just told this story about somebody and how that made you feel. By doing that, it makes us want to do more. It makes us say, “Ooh, I’m either going to do what that person did or I’m going to translate that into something that I can do. I want that feeling again.” So that’s a bigger, better thing to strive for.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, Deborah, tell me, any other top things you want to make sure to mention before we hear about your favorite things?

Deborah Heiser
I would tell everyone, look to your left and look to your right, you’re probably looking at a mentor. And if they aren’t right now, you can either be mentoring them or they can be mentoring you at some point. So, think of every single person you meet as a potential mentor or mentee.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. Well, now could you share your favorite quotes, something you find inspiring?

Deborah Heiser
I think the favorite quote is, “Mentors change lives. Mentors change the world.” And I think that it’s because that really is true.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Deborah Heiser
My favorite book has always been Marie Curie, her autobiography, because she was somebody who did something that was completely new and unique, and kept following her passion, even though it was at a time when it was very difficult and women weren’t in leadership positions and she just did it.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Deborah Heiser
I’m old school, I use this.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, a notebook.

Deborah Heiser
And that, I’ve never given up. I would suggest to anybody that, you know, structure is such an important part of our work day. Whatever modern tools you can use to get that, use it. It makes a difference because each one of these things that you can check off makes you feel like a winner throughout the day.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Deborah Heiser
I think that my favorite habit is walking every single day.

Pete Mockaitis
Lovely. And is there a key nugget you share that really connects and resonates with folks, you hear them quoting it back to you often?

Deborah Heiser
I hear people talking about look to your left, look to your right. Lateral mentoring is something that has resonated with individuals, and I get that over and over again.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Deborah Heiser
I’d point them to my website, DeborahHeiser.com. I’m on LinkedIn. I write for Psychology Today. You can find me there. I have a Substack, “The Right Side of 40.” And you can find my book, The Mentorship Edge, anywhere you get books.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Deborah, thank you.

Deborah Heiser
Thank you.

1105: The Five Critical Roles of Every Winning Team with Mark Murphy

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Mark Murphy shares insights from his research on maximizing team effectiveness.

You’ll Learn

  1. Why you don’t want a team of all “team players”
  2. The simple trick for more decisive teams
  3. How to get your team to generate 3X more valuable ideas

About Mark

Mark Murphy is a New York Times bestselling author, Senior Contributor to Forbes, and Founder of Leadership IQ, a research and training firm. His latest book is TEAM PLAYERS: The Five Critical Roles You Need to Build A Winning Team. Mark’s previous bestselling books include: Hiring for Attitude, Hundred Percenters, HARD Goals, Managing Narcissists, Blamers, Dramatics and more. 

Mark leads one of the world’s largest databases of original leadership research, and his work has appeared in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Fortune, Forbes, Bloomberg, BusinessWeek, Harvard Business Review, and U.S. News & World Report. He’s been a featured guest on programs including CBS News Sunday Morning, ABC’s 20/20, Fox Business News, CNN International and NPR. 

Some of his most well-known research studies include “Why New Hires Fail,” “Are SMART Goals Dumb?,” “Why CEO’s Get Fired,” “High Performers Can Be Less Engaged,” and “Don’t Expect Layoff Survivors to Be Grateful.” Mark has conducted training for The United Nations, Harvard Business School, Microsoft, IBM, MasterCard, Merck, and thousands more.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Mark Murphy Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Mark, welcome back!

Mark Murphy
Thank you for having me. I’m glad I got invited back.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, you know, well, it took seven years. What’s that? It’s almost like a biblical punishment. You were exiled for seven years, Mark. But now…

Mark Murphy
I had to go wander out there for a bit and I made my way back now.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to talk about teamwork, team players. And could you maybe kick us off by sharing a particularly surprising, fascinating discovery you’ve made about teams in the seven years since we chatted last?

Mark Murphy
So, the biggest thing, one was not surprising, and that is there are plenty of people that find that the teams they’re on, that they’re forced to sit on every day, aren’t always great uses of their time. But the bigger issue was that, when we started studying this and we asked people, “Listen, is the team you sit on presently, is it actually taking advantage of your talents? Like, do you feel like you get to use your real abilities?”

And two thirds plus of people were like, “No, not really. Like, I’m forced to sit here. I have to go through, I’m part of the group and, you know, that’s good. But I don’t really get to use my strengths. I don’t get to do the thing that I am really well suited to.” And that led to the big kind of aha discovery about teams is that the most successful teams are teams that aren’t focused on trying to make everybody operate the same.

We have this kind of cliche definition of, “What is a team player?” Well, a team player, it’s usually like, they’re kind of outgoing, they’re very friendly, super agreeable, very conscientious, and they have high-end followership, they can get along, all that.

But it turns out that the best teams are more like a rock band, or a symphony orchestra, or an NFL team, or an NBA team. That is, if you look at an NFL team, you got some guys are like 350 pounds, you got others that are 220, some are six foot eight, some are five foot seven, some are really good at throwing a ball, some are good at catching a ball, some are good at pushing people, some are good at running fast.

There’s a weird mix of talents and abilities, and the best teams in business in the real world are ones that assemble sometimes weird seeming groups of people and let everybody do the thing that they’re really good at, rather than trying to stuff us all into a room and go, “We all got to act the same way. It’s all about cohesion. We can never say a cross word.”

Best teams are like, “Nah, no, no, this is, like, I need a center. I need a point guard. I need a forward. I need a shooting guard. I need a bunch of different talents. And y’all don’t have to look the same or act the same or think the same. In fact, it’s better if you don’t.” And that was kind of the big aha moment of this.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I like that a lot. And to your point about high agreeableness, well, we’re going to get there in a moment in terms of the five critical roles, one of them is a trailblazer. And, indeed, they don’t agree so much, and that’s super useful. And I think that’s just great to highlight right off the bat in terms of being a team player does conjure up images of what that’s “supposed to be.”

And I think I’ve even had moments in team conversations where it’s like, “Hmm, this doesn’t quite sound right to me, but I don’t want to cause trouble and I want to be a good team player. So maybe I’ll just keep quiet for now.” And, occasionally that’s the right move and, often, that’s the exact wrong move.

Mark Murphy
We just are releasing a new study next week on teams, and one of the findings was, we asked people, “Have you ever had an idea that you raised to the team and the team rejected out of hand?” And that was like nine out of 10 people. Or, “Have you had an idea that you were afraid to bring up to the group because you were afraid how people were going to react?” And that was, again, like, nine out of 10 people.

And it’s like, “How many brilliant ideas and innovations are we leaving on the table because people in the room were just afraid to say the thing that the emperor has no clothes, or there is a way better, faster way of doing this, or we are heading down a path that is going to waste all of our times?”

And if the idea of having a team is to get the best thinking possible out of all the people in the room, well, what good is that if we have people that are afraid to speak up because we told everybody, “You know, you got to go along to get along”? No. It kind of runs counter to what a team is supposed to be in the first place.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, we heard some of those messages before when it comes to the benefit or value of diversity is, “Hey, we get to have different people with different experiences and that’s great.” And so that’s why we can see some relationships between, mathematically, in research, associated with diverse teams and better outcomes. But my understanding is that you get none of the benefit of that diversity if folks don’t feel like they can, in fact, speak up and share from their unique different experiences.

Mark Murphy
That’s exactly the thing, is that you can even assemble a great diverse group, and all various kinds of diversity, you can have – racial diversity, gender diversity, cognitive diversity, take your pick. It doesn’t matter. But if there is not an environment where we are actively seeking out the input from those folks, or we are telling everybody, “Listen, this is what it takes to be a team player.”

And again, usually, whenever we use the word team player, we’re usually using it in a pejorative, like, “You need to be more of a team player, and here’s what that means.” And we’re trying to, like, sand off the edges of people. And, well, it’s like, “Listen, sometimes it’s the edges that give us the brilliant insight.”

So, if I’m not making it safe enough for you to actually come into this room and do what you do well, if you don’t get to come in here and use your strengths and leverage them, well, then, I’m not getting any of the advantages of having diversity.

And the other side of it is, one of the reasons that so many people, I mean, and every one of your listeners, I would venture to guess, has, at one point or another, sat on a team where they’re like, “Well, there’s an hour of my life I’m never getting back. And it’s like this is an absolute nightmare.”

And one of the reasons people will sometimes feel like that is, like, “I don’t know what I’m doing here because you’re asking me to either be something I’m not, or you’re ignoring the thing that I am. Like, I have this particular set of skills and talents. Let me use those skills and talents. And if you’re not going to let me use them, then I don’t know why I’m here.”

Pete Mockaitis
A particular set of skills. Shout out to Liam Neeson. Well, yeah, so your book, Team Players: The Five Critical Rules You Need to Build a Winning Team, whenever I hear a sort of a typology, like, the five, I have to grill you a bit, Mark. What is the underlying research that says, in fact, there are five and not nine and not three? And how do we know that there are five and that this is real as opposed to something that Mark slapped together because he’s got to get another book out?

Mark Murphy
Yeah, a great question and a very fair one. So, the way this all came about was we started looking at teams, really effective teams and really ineffective teams, let’s say nicely.

And we started to look at, “Okay, well, what are the functions that actually get fulfilled in this team? Like, is there a task function? Is there a decision-making function? Is there an interpersonal smoothing over function, kind of a diplomacy function. “Is there a brainstorming or an ideation, an innovation kind of function? Is there a tracking function like, know, to-do list, milestones, Gantt charts, that kind of stuff.”

And as we started to dissect the various functions, one thing that quickly became clear was that the best teams are pretty good at making decisions, and we didn’t even care at the moment who was making the decisions, just, “Do decisions get made? Okay, cool. Is there a tracking kind of function on this team? Like, do you have any mechanism for ensuring that to-do’s get met? Do you have any kind of a peacekeeping function? You know, is there anything where, when conflict arises or conversations get a little tense, etc.?”

And so, the first thing was we identified that there are five kinds of rough buckets. Now, you can cut these buckets more finely. At one point, we had these cut into like 13 different functions. And we looked at that and said, “Well, okay, probably half of those are like played by the same people. And so maybe 13 is a little much.”

And so, we threw some, not to go too deep into this, but through some K-means cluster analysis, we kind of distilled this down into five that were notably distinct from each other, kind of buckets of work. And then we started to look at, “Okay, who are the people on the team? And what roles are they actually filling?”

And that’s where we discovered that, most of the time, for example, there’s usually somebody on the team, and a really good team, who is capable of making a tough decision. Maybe the group can decide for themselves, they take a vote, “Poof. No fuss, no muss.” But when the rubber hits the road and there you get a sticking point, is there somebody in the group who’s willing to raise their hand and go, “Wait a minute, okay, we’ve debated this long enough. Here’s the path we’re taking, let’s just go.”

That role was often not the same person that was playing that kind of peacemaker sort of role. Because as you might imagine, to play that tougher decision-maker role is a different kind of personality than the person who is kind of smoothing over ruffled feathers and smoothing over hurt feelings and bringing people back into feeling safe and comfortable in the group. Those were very distinct personality types.

So that’s how we came up with the five. It really wasn’t about the people, initially, as much as it was, “What does a team actually have to do to be successful?” I mean, you can take any kind of team. If you can’t make a decision, hey, it’s not going to be a good team. If you can’t hit a deadline on time, not going to be a good team.

When things get really heated, if you don’t have a way to resolve conflict, team’s not going to work all that well. So that’s the origin of this.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And so then, tell us a bit more about the subsequent research associated with the outcomes that teams that have these roles see better stuff than teams that don’t.

Mark Murphy
Then, once we had these five roles, and so the five roles are there’s the director, and that’s the person who makes those decisions when necessary. They’re not making every decision, but they’re capable of making that decision. There’s the achiever. This is the person that they don’t necessarily want to be in charge. They’re the person who’s like, “Give me a task. Let me go do some stuff, and I’ll be the worker bee. Okay, cool.”

There’s a stabilizer, and that’s like your to-do list Gantt chart calendar milestone person. Then you have your harmonizer. That’s like your peacekeeper. And then there’s the trailblazer, and that’s the person that, you know, will come up with the crazy innovative ideas, the out-of-the-box, even if it’s sometimes annoying and irritating, but they will shake things up a bit.

Now, when we had those roles, we then went back and started to look at, “Okay, the really effective teams versus the less effective teams.” And what we discovered was, number one, that the best teams, really, really good teams, if you ask somebody, “What’s the best team you’ve ever been on?” start there. And in 97% of those teams, all five roles were filled.

Then ask people, “Okay, well, what’s the worst team that you’re currently sitting on?” Okay, and look at those teams. And what you would find is only about 20% of those teams actually had all five roles filled. They were missing roles.

So, for example, if you think about a team that, when you go, “Hey, can your team, does it actually decide anything? Like, is it capable of just pulling the trigger and making a real decision?” and they say, “No,” well, nine times out of 10, that’s because that team doesn’t have a director. It doesn’t have somebody who is willing to ante up and say, “Even if this is unpopular, I will make that really hard decision.” Every team needs somebody.

Or, if you ask the team, “Hey, do you guys actually hit your deadlines? Like, when a team decides it’s going to do something, do you actually deliver that thing on time?” And people say, “Nah, not really.” Well, it’s usually because you don’t have that person, and every good office has one, it’s the person who keeps the calendar, and is like, “Hey, wait a minute, timeline here. We got a deadline to hit. Like, let’s move this along. Don’t forget the to-dos.” You need that kind of task master.

And when you find these lower-performing teams, the ones that kind of drive us all nuts, what we find is, overwhelmingly, they are missing at least one, sometimes two or three of the roles. And then on the other end of the spectrum, sometimes those teams had too many of one role. If you think about teams where the team is, like, always in a fight over what the decision is going to be and who’s going to get to make the decision, usually, it’s because you got, like, two or three or four directors.

You got like a bunch of people that all think they should be in charge of making the final decision. And then half your team meeting is spent with those people kind of fighting with each other over what it is we’re going to decide. And that becomes every bit as much of a nightmare as a team that can’t make a decision.

That’s basically it. Sometimes you will see in a team, like, “Yeah, we got 10 people who are great at keeping the calendar, but we got, like, nobody actually willing to roll up their sleeves and do the work. We just got 10 people who, you know, want to keep us on track, but nobody actually like doing stuff.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And when you mentioned the effective teams and the ineffective teams, what’s the data set?

Mark Murphy
So, this was across, we started with about 1200 teams that we looked at. It has since broadened out to now we’ve got over 100,000 people, and that’s spread across, now I think it’s broken 10,000 various teams. But the initial study, well, the very first pilot study was about 400 teams. Then it went up to about 1200, and then it just started scaling up from there.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes, but like where do you find the teams and assess the performance?

Mark Murphy
So, the teams initially come from either our research or our survey clients or our training clients. And so, we start with pools of people there. So, we’re dealing with organizations, so 95% of them are business organizations. And I say business because some of those are not for profit. So, there’s hospitals, there’s libraries, there’s a few government organizations.

But then the majority are your classic kind of for-profit, but it runs the gamut from organizations that, our initial cutoff, was an organization had to have at least a little over 50 people, and then all the way up to organizations with tens of thousands. And we set that limit, usually in studies like this, initially, because if you have a company with three people or eight people, and that’s like the entirety of the company, there can be a lot of confounding factors when you’re looking at a team.

So, we usually don’t touch the really small companies until later in the process, just because it’s, you never really know exactly what you’re getting because they’re so variable from each other. But then once you have a model, that’s where you can start to get some of the smaller shops.

Pete Mockaitis
Alrighty. And so then, how do we know? Part of it, I guess, you just recognize immediately from these descriptions, “Oh, yep, that’s a director. Yep, that’s a stabilizer. Got it.” But how do you recommend we understand and assess the makeup of a team?

Mark Murphy
Simplest, easiest way is at your next team meeting, go, “Hey, folks. Let’s try a little something. Here are these five roles. I want everybody to jot down, ‘What role do you think others would say that I play?’ and we’ll just go around, okay?” So, I’m Mark, I’m going to ask, “Okay, what’s the role that I think others would say that I most typically play on this team?”

“Okay, Jane, what about you? Oh, Pete, what about you? What role would you say people are most likely to say you typically play. Frank?” and we just go around, and we each identify, “Okay, what’s the role that we are probably most typically playing?” That’s one.

Once you have a pretty good sense of that, if you look around the room, and you’re like, “Huh, everybody said that they’re the director. Huh, we might have a problem here.” That’s step one, is just see what kind of distribution of people you actually have.

The second thing then is, based on those descriptions, is go, “Okay, well, what role really feels like it’s one that I would want to play? And maybe I’m not currently playing it, but what’s a role that maybe I would like to try out?” So, if I’m somebody that I am always in the role of stabilizer, I’m the one who is always keeping track of the deadlines and the to-do list and nagging people to get their work in on time, blah blah blah.

And maybe I look at this and I go, “You know what, I would love to just be the achiever. I would love to not have to manage the to-do list for this group, and I would love if somebody would just give me an assignment and let me go make the PowerPoint presentation. Just let me go roll up my sleeves and do some work without having to manage all of the other to-do’s for this group.”

And sometimes what you’ll find is that the role that we’re currently being forced to play isn’t the one that we necessarily really want to play, but we’re, for whatever reason, sometimes there’s just nobody else to do it, but we’re kind of forced into it.

But if you know, “Here’s the role that I’m usually seen as playing. Here’s the role that I most commonly play in the team. And here’s the role that I would really love to play,” it’s not that you’re going to magically be able to instantly do 100% of the role you would love to do, because you might still be necessary in the role you’re doing.

But if you can start to bleed this out a little bit and merge those two and go, “You know, some days, I want to be the stabilizer, but some days, I want to be the achiever. Some days, I want to be the harmonizer. Or, some days, I want to try that trailblazer thing.” Cool. Now you have a way to kind of identify something about the work you’re doing that might be more interesting to you, something that might get you a little more excited to go to this team meeting.

If your team can come together and say, “Listen, let’s give each other a chance to actually make sure, A, all the roles are covered, but, B, if you want to try and do something a little different in this group, okay, cool, try it. And let’s see if we can make it work because, if we can get you doing something that gets you excited, you’re that much more likely to be invested in the group and committed and feel good about the job.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so let’s say we’ve done this good work, we’ve identified the roles where people are doing the roles that light them up, they’re feeling good about it, we’ve got a reasonable balance or mix on the team. Once that’s in play, what are some of the best and worst practices for really rocking and rolling together?

Mark Murphy
So, a couple of things, and these are going to, some of them are a little weird. So, number one, every group needs somebody to make decisions, yes. So, sounds like I’m advocating for some kind of hierarchy. But one of the things we discovered was that, in really good teams, there’s always somebody who makes the decision, but it’s not always the same somebody. And that was kind of the big aha moment.

So, if you think of it like this, you got a basketball team. You have your Hall of Fame, All-Star player. It’s three seconds left in the game. They’ve got the ball, but three defenders converge on them. They’re looking around, and they’re like, “Okay, I could try and shoot it, but there’s three defenders on me. This is going to go terribly.”

And so, they look around and they see that this guy on the other side of the court, who’s a good shooter, but is not a Hall of Fame, not an All-Star. And they pass them the ball, and they’re like, “You know what, you’re in the best position to take this last-second shot. You’re in charge. You take the shot. Because I got three other bodies draped on me. There’s no way, whatever I do, it’s going in. But there’s a chance that you could actually make the shot.”

That’s what we call an adaptive hierarchy. NASA, very famously implemented the idea of adaptive hierarchies. If there’s a rocket ship that is having problems and you got somebody on the team that’s, like, the expert in fuel cells and knows everything about rocket fuel, and they’re like, “Listen, all the rest of us are pretty good at trajectories and telemetry and all the rest, but we’re not the expert in rocket fuel.”

They go, “Okay, well, who should be in charge of decisions about the rocket fuel?” “I don’t know that person over there who’s the expert in rocket fuel. When it comes to fuel related issues, they’re in charge.”

But the thing that is cool, and this is one thing that makes groups really interesting when they’re really clicking, is that it’s not so much everybody gets a turn necessarily, because that’s not the idea. It’s that everybody who is the expert in that particular area, gets to take charge of that particular area they’re expert in.

So, it’s how you get a team that can always make decisions. They have a clear hierarchy, but it doesn’t feel rigid and like some, you know, royal family thing where I always have to bow and genuflect in front of so and so. No, it’s maybe today is my turn to be in charge of making this particular decision, because it’s an area that I’m really good at.

And so, that’s one big thing that you can do as a team that is trying this out for the first time is just go, “Let’s have whoever is most expert at this thing be in charge of making the decision for that thing. And tomorrow it’ll be somebody else. The day after that will be somebody else, but let’s rotate this a bit.”

Pete Mockaitis
I like that a lot. And you also mentioned in the book the research showing that teams generate three times as many valuable ideas when the rules are each thinking independently before coming together. And can you dig into that a little bit and give us an example of that?

Mark Murphy
Yes, it’s, you know, one of the things that every team has tried at one point or another is brainstorming, right? So, you all sit in a room and you just start ideating. There’s no bad ideas and we’re just going to throw some stuff up on the whiteboard and just toss as many ideas out there as you possibly can. Okay, cool.

The problem is that a herding effect starts to take place. And sometimes it’s known as a conformity bias, is that, as people start throwing their ideas up on the wall, it starts to become clear that some of these ideas are more kind of mainstream than other ideas are. And what ends up happening is people start to coalesce around a very narrow set of ideas. And the crazy ones, which might hold your best thinking, kind of get pushed off to the side.

So, what researchers discovered was that you would get much better ideas, when they put people in a room and had them brainstorm, okay, that was level one. But when you told people, “Okay, we’re going to come into the room and we’re going to have a brainstorming session. But before we do that, you think by yourself for 10 minutes, just come up with your own brainstorming ideas for 10 minutes, then we’ll all come into the room together.”

And what they found was that the ideas got better, more innovative, even more profitable and valuable when people took 10 minutes of thinking by themselves before coming into the room to do the “brainstorming” because they were not filtering themselves when they were thinking alone.

And so, the next time you have a team meeting, one great thing to try is tell your group, “Listen, I want everybody to think about this alone. And I want you to come in with your ideas written down.” One reason for making everybody write down their ideas, or type them up, whatever, before coming into the meeting is that they can’t say, “Oh, I didn’t have any more ideas,” because you wrote them down.

So, this way, it really forces everybody to have their crazy, big innovation ideas, whatever, out of the box, and put it down on paper, and then come into the meeting room. Now you know that you are not going to get people who are afraid to speak up. You’re not going to get people that are filtering themselves and holding back their great ideas because they don’t want to seem like a weirdo. You get all those great crazy ideas and that’s where some of the best stuff comes from.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, Mark, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention?

Mark Murphy
I think the one other thing to think about is that, and this is just a way of making teams more effective, is going back to something we talked about earlier, Pete, is the, “Listen, what role would you love to play on this team?” I think this one is really important because, one of the things that I found when we were doing this research, is that there are a lot of people who are like, “Listen, I’m kind of quiet. I’m more introverted. I’m not predisposed to love groups necessarily.”

But when we found that even the most introverted of people, when they got to play the role that they were really good at, they’re like, “Yeah, I love groups. This actually isn’t so bad. This isn’t as bad as I thought it was going to be at all,” just because they got to do the thing that really mattered to them. And it’s just such a simple thing, asking people, like, “What’s the role you’d like to try out in this group?”

Give it a shot because, if it gives somebody on your team that maybe didn’t love teams, the chance to actually enjoy working on a team, man, it can make all the difference in the world and it’s not that hard to do.

Pete Mockaitis
Lovely. Now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Mark Murphy
Well, the one that relates to teams, and it’s going to sound weird, Michael Jordan was walking off the court one day after practice in the late ‘90s, one of his assistant coaches, Tex Winters, hollers out to him, “Hey, Michael, there’s no I in team.” And Jordan looks back at him, and goes, “Yeah, but there is in win.”

Now, what Michael meant by that was, “Yeah, you know what? I’m the most important person.” But what he later came to find was that what that really means is that, “I have a role I have to play, but you know what? I got to be willing to pass the ball to the other I.”

So, when he learned to trust Scottie Pippen, when he learned to trust Dennis Rodman, when he learned to trust Steve Kerr, for example, to take the last-second shot, all of a sudden, the idea that there are a bunch of I’s on a team that really do make a team successful, you know what, yeah, they’re not technically an I in team, but there is a me.”

And my whole thing is, listen, find the me’s, allow the me’s on your team to be themselves. And you’re going to have one heck of a higher-performing team.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Mark Murphy
So, one that I quote in the book, but it’s just such a classic study, Solomon Asch in the ‘50s did this study, and this speaks to what you were asking me about with brainstorming, for example. So, there’s eight people sitting in a room, and these eight people have to look at a sheet of paper and there are lines drawn on the sheet of paper.

So, like maybe one line is like the length of your thumb, and then another line is like the length of your first finger. So, there’s clearly a big difference in the length of these lines, right? And so, the people in the room, they were all asked like, “Okay, well, which line is longer?” Now, seven of the eight people in the room were actors. Only one of the eight people was the actual subject of the study.

And so, the seven people would go, “Well, the thumb length line, that’s the longer one.” And the eighth guy in the room, or gal, would look and go, “What? Are you nuts? Like, that’s clearly, that’s the shorter line. That’s not the longer line. Like, anybody could see this.” But because the other seven were like, “Nope, that’s the longer line,” they started to doubt themselves, even though their eyes told them crystal clearly, which is the longer line.

Three quarters of the subjects in that study changed their answers at one time or another through the course of the study to conform with the group. Thirty percent of all of the answers, people knowingly gave the wrong answer because they wanted to fit in. That, I think, is such an important study to bear in mind.

And even though it’s 70, what, 75 years old now, it is still as relevant today as it was back then. Because if you really want to get some innovative thinking in your group, and you want a team to perform, the last thing you want is somebody in the room to lie to you just because they don’t want to look, to be the only one who is willing to tell you the truth. That is just absolute death for a team.

So just always kind of think of that, “If seven other people are saying something, how am I going to get that one person to speak up?”

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Mark Murphy
The one I love, still, is a book by Erich Fromm and it’s from 1940-41, somewhere in there, called Escape from Freedom.

And the book is basically an exploration about, “Why do, sometimes, people give up their freedom? Why do they not want to make decisions?” And it comes back to a lot of what we’re talking about here, is that sometimes, it can feel lonely to be the only person making this decision.

And while, you know, it’s, again, it’s what, 80-some odd years old now, there’s a lot of great wisdom in it. And while not everything in it is perfect, it does raise the question, I think, for every team leader is, “How am I taking this into account with my group? Am I making it okay for people to make decisions?”

Like, when we talk about adaptive hierarchies and rotating responsibility, all of this is to try and grow people that are more capable of making decisions so that I don’t have to do everything. I want people to have more freedom and autonomy. And to do that, I have to do some of these things.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Mark Murphy

So, there are a bunch. So, I’m going to give an AI answer and I’m going to give the either ChatGPT or Claude, but one of the things that we started doing with it was, so we have statisticians on our team that, when we create new studies, we’re running all of our statistics. But we started using ChatGPT and Claude, both of them, to model out different scenarios with our statistics, not just to get another set of eyes and error check it.

So, like when we, you know, “Let’s run the K-means cluster analysis and see how these groups come up.” But we can then run scenarios that, if we were doing it just like in SPSS or R or something, would take weeks. But now we can just throw it in and say, “Okay, here’s the model we developed. Here’s the statistical model. Here’s all of our data. Now, run this scenario this way. Now run it again this way.”

And so, we can model out a hundred different scenarios in a day, where it used to be, if we wanted to model out five different scenarios, it would take two weeks. And I know it’s kind of a weird use case, but one of the things that AI does exceptionally well is it will take an idea you’ve already developed, with data you already have, and allow you to play with, “What would happen if kind…?” of scenarios, “What would happen if these people weren’t in the study? What would happen if we had 10 more months that looked like this?” and just model out and do a little more scenario planning.

So, that’s one of my favorites, it’s a tool everybody has access to. It’s just, I don’t see as many people using it in that way, but it’s such a fun, cool use case for it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite habit?

Mark Murphy
One habit that I do try and maintain, even when I’m traveling, is just 30 minutes of showing up for some kind of exercise. Even if it is nothing more than squats and pushups and sit-ups in my hotel room, it is one habit that does help set the day on a more effective path. And it is sort of like, you know, when you hear retired military folks talk about making the bed.

It’s something over which I do have control and it is something over which I can do pretty much regardless of where I am or what part of the planet I happen to be traveling to. It’s even if it’s just, you know, 15 minutes of some pushups and then some squats and then even not good sit ups, whatever. It’s something. And it’s something you can check the box, and go, “You know what? That’s something done today.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Mark Murphy
If you go to LeadershipIQ.com, there’s a Team Players section on the website. And one thing that I do encourage people to do is there’s a free quiz on there. It’s called, “What kind of team player are you?” Take the quiz and see what comes out. And then, listen, the thing is free, have your team take it, too, and see how you come out. There’s a bunch of different research studies and resources like that, but it literally takes less than five minutes. So, not that hard to do.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Beautiful. Mark, thank you.

Mark Murphy
Thanks again for having me. Hopefully, it won’t be seven years next time.

1104: Exploring the Timeless Principles of Influence through a Christian Lens with Brian Ahearn

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Brian Ahearn shares his strategies for people looking to create ethical and meaningful change–both at work and at home.

You’ll Learn

  1. How modern psychology and the Bible support each other
  2. How to build instant rapport with anyone
  3. The master key to cementing your authority

About Brian

Brian Ahearn is the Chief Influence Officer at Influence PEOPLE. An international trainer and consultant, he specializes in applying the science of influence in everyday situations. He is one of only a dozen individuals in the world who holds the Cialdini Method Certified Trainer designation. 

Brian’s first book, Influence PEOPLE: Powerful Everyday Opportunities to Persuade that are Lasting and Ethical, was named one of the Top 100 Influence Books of All Time by BookAuthority. His LinkedIn courses have been viewed by more than 400,000 people around the world.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Brian Ahearn Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Brian, welcome back!

Brian Ahearn
It’s great to be back, Pete. Nice to see you.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s good to see you, and you shared earlier that you are now a grandpa.

Brian Ahearn
Yes, it’s so much better than people tell you. They tell you all these great things. The way I would equate it is people can tell you about falling in love. But once you fall in love, it’s so much better than anybody can describe, and grandparenting is the same way.

Pete Mockaitis
Awesome. Well, I’ve decided to chat about your latest book, Influenced from Above: Where Faith and Influence Meet. Tell us, what’s the story here?

Brian Ahearn
Well, the story is a continuation of the book I wrote called The Influencer: Secrets to Success and Happiness. And it follows that main character, John Andrews, and he’s about 18 months into his retirement and he’s feeling a little empty. He’s had a great life. He’s done really well in business but he’s feeling a little bored, like, “There has to be more to life than just enjoying the fruits of my labor.”

And he, ultimately, gets involved with his church in a community center building project. And he has to begin to straddle the line of not only what helped him succeed in business, but also dealing with a faith-based community. And through his studies and interactions, he begins to see this connection between Cialdini’s principles of influence and biblical tenets.

And so, the story fleshes that out with a lot of different characters and some twists and turns and things like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, intriguing. So biblical tenets, well, first of all, let’s address that right up front. For folks who aren’t so much into Christianity, or any faith tradition, do you see value in this book for them as well?

Brian Ahearn
Yes, because so many of the things that are talked about are timeless in terms of, they’ve been around as long as humanity. One example we know about reciprocity, if I do a good turn for you, you feel a sense of obligation to want to do something for me. That’s been around as long as human beings have been around.

Jesus said, “It’s better to give than receive,” and, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” so he was really talking about reciprocity. So, I think that the storyline will help people really see, whether they want to talk about biblical connections or, more generally, spiritual connections, I think that they will see that so many of the things that Cialdini and other social scientists have proven, via research and experiments, that these things have been talked about for thousands of years by very wise people.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, then. So, these principles of influence are fantastic, and we’ve chatted about them a couple of times in the show, as well as we had Bob Ciadini himself also speaking to them. So, could you unpack a little bit about some of the extra ancient perspectives on each of them?

Brian Ahearn
To start with, as we were discussing before we jumped on air, what spurred this book on was my daughter’s question. She had seen me present here in Columbus, Ohio many, many years ago. And we had lunch and we had a great discussion about what I had shared. And then she asked this question, she said, “Dad, what I want to know is where’s God in all this? Where does he fit into the psychology that you are teaching people?”

And it was just an off-the-cuff conversation, and that was the genesis for the idea of the book. But one of the things I remember telling her, I said, “Abigail, in business, we may not talk about love. But if we employ this principle of liking the right way, we get pretty close to it. When we’re not looking to get people to like us, just so we can get them to say yes and move our agenda forward, when we instead focus on coming to like the people that we’re with, that’s what changes everything.”

Because, you know, Pete, the more that you see that, “Hey, this guy, Brian, he really does seem to care about me,” that’s what opens you up to whatever I might ask. But, at the same time, because I’m getting to know and like you, I do want what’s best for you. And so, we’ve really gone from transactional to relational in terms of our interaction. And, to me, that’s getting pretty close to love.

Love is about doing what is best for others, even at a sacrifice to yourself. And so, we can get pretty close if we choose to engage this principle of liking the right way. And then it transforms our giving, right? So, when we talk about reciprocity and I do a good turn for you and you feel like you should do something for me, but I’m not just doing something to get you to do something in return.

Because I’ve come to know and like you, now I really want what’s best for Pete. And so, therefore, I’m looking for ways to genuinely help you. And even if it’s not the right thing, there’s grace coming from you because you know that I like you and care for you and that I’m really trying to help you. I just may not understand exactly the best way to do it in that moment, but that’s the kind of thing that transforms the relationship.

And so, our conversation just started going down the line, talking about these different principles and why coming to know and like somebody, in other words, getting close to that love, really can begin to transform how we interact, how we do business, and how we form relationships.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, I’d like to go into some depth with each of the six principles there. So, we’ve touched a bit about reciprocity.

Brian Ahearn
We could talk about unity.

Pete Mockaitis
Unity?

Brian Ahearn
Yeah, unity. Unity is one of the relationship building principles. And so, it goes deeper even than the principle of liking.

So, when we know that there’s unity there, in other words, when we have a shared identity or a deep bond, that transcends liking. And the interesting thing about unity is we will do things for people that we’re unitized with, that we might not even do for some of our closest friends. I mean, you take, for example, if somebody needs a kidney, we’re probably going to help a family member first and foremost because we’re genetically wired to help our species go on.

And that is very self-sacrificing to do something like give a kidney to somebody else. You’re not looking for anything in return. But here’s the neat thing about unity is, when I’m helping you, Pete, and we have unity, it’s almost as if I’m helping myself. I mean, when I do things for my grandson, it does wonders for me, right? He is my flesh and blood relative and I will do anything for him. I will make any sacrifices for him.

And that’s the principle of unity, which I think really gets us even closer to love. Because, again, I said earlier, love is self-sacrificial. And another interesting thing about unity is we don’t always even have to like the person. But if we feel that deep sense of shared identity or bond, we are much more likely to do something to try to help that individual.

So now we’ve really gone deep in the relationship aspect, hopefully, starting with liking, but maybe discovering unity. And I think that transforms the relationships that we have on a personal and professional level.

Pete Mockaitis
Can we talk about some of the ways that unity comes about?

Brian Ahearn
Unity, first and foremost, by genetics, our flesh and blood, our family, we are naturally unitized with them. Another great example from my lifetime was my father who served in the Marines.

And one thing he said was, “I still value Marine friendships above all others, even if they weren’t from Vietnam. There’s an invisible bond that joins us forever. If a Marine has a need, others will step in and help. It must be the result of having gone through such terrible times together.”

So, my dad didn’t really know much about the principles that I teach, but he recognized there was this invisible bond, and that word bond is really significant to the point where if a Marine had a need, others step in. It doesn’t matter how well you know them. It doesn’t even matter if you like them, “They are one of us and, therefore, we will do whatever we have to for that individual.”

So, again, from my life that’s the best example that I’ve seen of the principle of unity outside of the family relationship.

Pete Mockaitis
And what’s interesting about that notion is that, in some sort of groups, some folks will experience it and others will not. Like, I’m thinking in terms of, if it’s a faith community, if it’s being an alumnus, alumna, from a university, it’s interesting. Like, sometimes we feel it and other times we don’t. What are the core drivers behind that?

Brian Ahearn
Well, I think the proximity and the closer that you are to people. So, your example of like a university, certain universities have great reputation. They do a really good job of making people who go to those universities feel something special and significant.

Certainly, if you and I went to the same university and graduated in the same class, we would probably feel a deeper sense of unity than if I had gone to school with somebody who graduated 10 years before or 10 years after. We’ll still have it. It may not be as significant because you and I would have gone through the same things at the same time, maybe had the same teachers, remembered the same things that were happening on campus that create an emotional bond for us.

So, yes, there will be times whether it’s organizations or faith-based communities where you’ll have a unity but you can have it even stronger.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. And then how do you think about the principles of spirituality within that?

Brian Ahearn
Well, there’s a verse in the Bible where it says that there’s neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female. We are all one in Christ Jesus. So that’s what Christ was pointing his disciples toward, that there was a sense of unity, especially before his crucifixion. He was praying that they would be one as he is one with the Father.

And so, that’s really how faith, I think, comes in. Again, we’re seeing this, thousands of years before anybody was talking about a principle called unity. But people who were extremely wise and connected understood that that was extremely significant. If those disciples were unitized, they were much more likely to be there and support one another in what became for, I think, virtually all of them, except for the Apostle John. It led to their own self-sacrificial deaths.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, absolutely. All right. Now let’s hear some ancient depth and goodness associated with the principles of commitment and consistency.

Brian Ahearn
Well, with commitment, the Bible talks about, “Let your yes be yes and your no be no,” and don’t make vows that you cannot repay. So, again, to a personal consistency in that principle says that we feel an internal psychological pressure, but also external social pressure to be consistent in what we say and what we do.

So, first and foremost, if we are consistent, we generally feel better about ourselves, which is a huge driver. Nobody likes to feel bad about themselves. So, we work very hard to keep our word. But, nonetheless, we need to be taught that. From childhood we are taught about don’t lie and do what you say. And so, we begin to get that sense of how important it is to do what we said we would do.

Pete Mockaitis
And now, as you’re dropping some verses here, I’m forming some connections here. I’m thinking about, “The measure with which you measure will be measured out unto you.” So, we’ve got some sort of honesty, commitment, consistency, as well as reciprocity, it’s like, “Well, if you’re cheating others with bogus measurements, then, likewise, you might expect them to do so,” as well as in the “Our Father” prayer, “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us,” in similar format.

Brian Ahearn
Yeah, so in that case, we have been given something, and that is forgiveness. Now, God doesn’t need us to reciprocate that back toward him, but he encourages us to, then, freely give that to others because it was freely given to us. So, it is engaging reciprocity, but it’s more in the form of a pay-it-forward, “I’ve done this for you. I hope you’ll do this for others who are in need of this.”

And I think when we really start to come to the recognition that we do need forgiveness, then it becomes a lot easier to realize, “Well, other people are like me, and this has benefited me tremendously, this burden kind of taken off my shoulders. I should try to do the same and encourage others by being that kind of forgiving individual.”

And then, again, I am mirroring what Christ was teaching his disciples, “If you don’t forgive, how do you expect your heavenly father to forgive you if you won’t forgive those who’ve trespassed against you?”

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, and now perhaps a bigger question is, I think that it’s quite possible for folks to twist, to abuse the word in terms of thinking, “Oh, okay, so Brian says it’s all good according to God himself, to unload, rock and roll, with wild abandon, these influence principles.” What do you think are some of the key checks in terms of being genuinely ethical, moral, loving with the use of these things?

Brian Ahearn
I have an interesting quote in the beginning of the book, where I talk about that I don’t see faith and science as in conflict. I get excited when I see that science confirms what faith has talked about for thousands of years. And the example that I shared was from a book called Sway by Ori and Rom Brafman.

And they were talking about brain imaging studies that showed there were two distinct centers in our brain. One lights up, or is engaged, when we are doing things for an altruistic reason. The other is engaged when we are doing things for a reward. But never do the two things, or the two parts of that brain, engage at the same time.

In other words, you’re either doing it for an altruistic reason or you’re doing it for a reward. And that goes back to something that Jesus said too. He said, “You can’t serve God and mammon,” or money. “You will either love one or love the other. You can’t serve two masters.”

And so, when I read that study, I just thought, “Wow, this is so interesting that we were being encouraged.” And I know people might think, “Well, you know, I can do things to get a little reward. I’m okay with that.” It’s really about what you’re starting with, “Am I trying to truly benefit or help this individual regardless of what may come back to me or what it might cost me?” That’s really probably very close to the altruistic.

But if I’m doing something, like I could be giving a lot of money to a charity, wonderful for the charity, but am I doing it because I so believe in that or I’m doing it for a tax break? And we know a lot of people do things because they want the tax break. Well, you’ve just received your reward.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Or the influence or the cache or the praise, your name on something.

Brian Ahearn
Sure.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s intriguing. And then there’s also this notion, I’ve heard similarly with these brain studies, that under certain circumstances, the parts of our brain light up associated with sort of the using of tools and then people can sort of fall into that category, it’s like, “Oh, you are a means to my end.” And then that’s not such a great spot to be in.

Brian Ahearn
Yes, people aren’t tools. I look at them and I say, “They’re children of God, created in the image of God. And so, therefore, I should treat them as such.” And let me be clear about this, too. I am in no way perfect or even great at this. I mean, it is a process that you’re always going through. And sometimes you realize you could have done something differently with somebody.

I think the key to that is to just confess it, like, “Wow, I was really crappy there.” But at least confessing it, you may make a better choice the next time. But in terms of, I think if we engage, going back to liking and/or unity, if we engage it the right way, it starts to shift that individual as a means to an end, “Because I want to get the sale,” or whatever the case may be.

And I will give you an example that, many years ago, I have a client, they’ve been an awesome client, and as I was working with them, the person who’s the VP of sales, said, “Hey, I’m not sure there’s going to be any opportunity the way the economy is.” And I told him, I said, “That’s okay.” I said, “I really like you and I want to make sure we stay in touch.”

And so, we continued to do that. And after our daughter got married three and a half years ago, I sent an email, and said, “Hey, Abigail got married. It was one of the best days of my life so far,” and had a couple pictures. Well, he came back and said, “That is great.” He said, “I just got engaged. Would you come to Germany for our wedding?” I’m like, “Heck, yes. That would be incredible.”

So, Jane and I made our first trip to Central Europe and had a wonderful time. The wedding was incredible. Everything about it was great. So, our friendship got deeper at that point. And there were things that went on during the wedding, too, that I felt like connected us even more deeply.

Later, as we maintained our friendship and I did the natural, “Hey, you guys thinking about kids?” And then he said, “Yeah, but we’re going to have to try in vitro for certain reasons.” And I said, “You know what? Our daughter was born through in vitro.” I mean, now we are unitized because not very many people have gone through that process, but I was able to share with him the highs and lows and the success and the failures, and just be a friend to him.

By the grace of God, they’re pregnant. They’re going to have a little girl in December. But he and I, whether or not I ever do business with his company again, is almost irrelevant because of the connection and the friendship I have. But I also understand this, Pete, that if they have a need, they’ll probably turn to me because he knows I genuinely care about him as a person and I really care about the success of their organization as I’ve gotten to know about it and the individuals there.

So those are the kind of things, I think, that transform business and relationships.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, let’s hear some ancient perspective on authority.

Brian Ahearn
A great one with authority was they said Jesus didn’t speak like the scribes and the Pharisees. He spoke as one with authority. And how often we fall prey to the belief that we have to have positional authority. I mean, it helps if you have the corner office, for sure. But what means a lot more, what we stress when we talk about being an authority is being a trusted expert. Because your expertise and your trust can transcend any role that you have.

And, obviously, that’s what Christ had. He had the trust of the people and he had the expertise with the authority, and he proved that by not only what he was saying, but then he backed it up by doing, right? “Anybody can say, you know, go in peace and be healed. Okay, you don’t think I have the authority to do that? Let me show you I do. Get up and walk.” And the paralytic got up and walked.

So, he is the example. And then the disciples became examples of that too, as many of them did miraculous things in His name.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. And I’m thinking about, when you think about authority and trust, there are many ways that trust is subtly built and eroded, in terms of your interactions and just sort of the life you live and what people can see from that.

Especially, I think when it costs us something. I think there’s a great degree of moral authority that shows up when people say and do things for a higher good at their own cost or expense. And maybe because it seems somewhat rare, that I just think, “Okay, that person is awesome.”

Like, they have stature in my eyes, they have authority, and there’s sort of a halo effect that goes on, in terms of, I naturally believe the things they are telling me are true and can be relied upon because I have witnessed virtue from this person.

Brian Ahearn
Aristotle, I’ve often used this quote, he said, “Character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion.” If we lose reputation because we’ve broken trust, it can destroy, I mean, you and I have lived long enough that we’ve seen this, it can destroy a lifetime of work. And so, therefore, we have to be very careful.

We don’t want to act like we’re walking on eggshells, but we have to be very careful about always doing right by people. And I always tell the people that I work with, “It’s not enough to tell the truth. We don’t hide the truth either.”

Because, Pete, if you knew that I was holding something back that was material to your decision-making, and then you made a decision and you would have made a different decision if you’d known that information, you will not be looking at me as a trustworthy person. You’ll be saying, “Brian, why didn’t you bring up this point?”

And for me to say, “Well, Pete, you didn’t ask,” is indefensible if I know that that would materially impact your decision. So, we tell the truth and we never hide the truth. And I think if we have that as a general way that we go through life, we are getting much closer to being that person of integrity that people will willingly trust.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, now let’s talk about some social proof.

Brian Ahearn
With social proof, it’s interesting that a lot of the things that are talked about in the Bible are kind of steering you away from social proof because, in following God, you are swimming upstream.

And we know that we can be influenced by other people, what many others are doing or what similar others are doing. And so, a lot of the time, we’re having to actually warn people against that. You know, it says that, “The way to destruction is broad and many are those who find it, but the way to life is narrow, and few are those that find it.”

So, that one’s that we have to be very sensitive to how we use it. And even in today’s day and age, quite often, people use social proof incorrectly. Example, if somebody said, if they were a teacher at a university, and they were to say to students, “You know, I just read a report that says 65% of students will cheat by the time they graduate. If I catch any of you cheating, I’ll have you down in the Dean’s office and get you expelled.”

But what I’ve just done there is I planted a seed, “Two out of every three students cheat at some point in their academic career?” And then, all of a sudden, somebody is stressed. They’ve got a lot of things going on, and, “Well, I’ll just do it this one time.” But I have, inadvertently, set the stage to make it easier for them cognitively to make that decision.

So, it’s a very interesting principle. We have to always utilize it to guide people in a direction that we want them to go. So, if two-thirds of students were cheating, but that same report said, “Cheating is on the decline,” I’m going to talk about the fact that cheating is on the decline, “You know, every year 10% fewer students are cheating,” or something like that, to try to get people thinking like, “Oh, this isn’t something I should try. This isn’t something I might get away with.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, social proof is just in us. We tend to follow the crowd. And so that’s a good caution there, is to highlight that. And then, I guess, in a way, there’s also a little bit of a streak in maybe some personalities that they want to be elite, rare, special, distinguished. And so, I think there may be some personality type. Or, what would you want to call it?

Brian Ahearn
Contrarian?

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. For that, a contrarian streak to them, were like, “Oh, well, then.” I think that’s people who like conspiracy theories, for example. I think that’s part of the appeal for them, it’s like, “Ooh, everyone is, the vast majority of people have the completely wrong idea, but I, and a few others, we really know what’s up here.” Although, I guess, in a way, that’s unity over there.

Brian Ahearn
Well, they can be unitized with that small group who believes as they believe, but they are also, in a sense, tapping into scarcity, “Everybody’s doing this, but this is the thing over here.” And, of course, that intrigues us. We are also naturally drawn to something that’s unique and different, rare, maybe not easily available. And so, it just piques our interest and, all of a sudden, you can take a step in that direction.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, any other thoughts on scarcity?

Brian Ahearn
With scarcity, that’s replete throughout the Bible too. We’re told to, as long as it is day to work, we don’t know when night is coming. The Apostle Paul talked about the return of Christ, “Nobody knows.” Even Jesus said, “Nobody knows the day or the hour except the Father.” That wasn’t to scare people, but it was to get them to think, “You know what, I don’t want this, whatever, to happen tomorrow and regret that I didn’t take action today.”

And so, it really, I think it’s there to incent us to always be looking to do the right thing, to live godly lives, to do right by others, to love them and things, because tomorrow is not guaranteed for anybody. And one of the worst things that we can do is be on the deathbed and think about all the stuff we didn’t do that we wish we had. So, I think it’s a good way to look at life.

Pete Mockaitis
Well said. Well, Brian, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention here?

Brian Ahearn
I think if people read the book, they’re going to start to see more deeply these connections, as John Andrews learns about these and has to deal with a faith-based community. It’s motivated differently than a secular community. And he’s dealing with trying to get donations and volunteers. He’s dealing with a city zoning board and the city council and having to also go there.

But in no case does he ever abandon one or the other. He’s always looking to say, “Okay, now that I understand that there seems to be this underpinning of these biblical tenets for these principles that have been so instrumental in my success in my career, how do I marry these two to be a more effective individual, whether I’m dealing with the secular or a faith-based community?”

Because in either case, we still, in large part, our success and happiness rests on getting people to say yes to us. But I hope people will see that we can go to a deeper level, a level that does right by people and allows us to feel really good about ourselves in the midst of that as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, now could you share a favorite book?

Brian Ahearn
Robert Cialdini’s book, Influence. And when Bob read the first draft of the book, he loved it. He said, “It’s totally unique.” He said, “I have never read anything that has tried to connect faith-based tenets to my principles.” And that was a huge compliment for me.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite habit?

Brian Ahearn
A favorite habit would certainly be working out. Every day, I’m up for 4:00-4:30 and go for a long walk, and then I come in and I work out for about 45 minutes and spend time stretching and try to get all that done by 6:00-6:15. So every day starts with that.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Brian Ahearn
First would be LinkedIn. And so, if anybody is finding this interesting, if they start following me or if they reach out to connect, they’re going to see something every day to help them learn a little bit more about how influence can help them in terms of their professional success and personal happiness.

The other would be my website, which is InfluencePeople.biz. There’s just a tremendous amount of information for people to really whet their appetite.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Brian Ahearn
Well, I’ll say two things. One is, this isn’t really so much of a challenge, but I do want to make people know that if they order the book, which comes out on October 21st, if they send an email to BookLaunch@InfluencePeople.biz, and they tell me the name of the second chapter, I will send them a free e-version of the book, The Influencer, so the prequel to this book. They’ll get that for free.

As far as what I want them to take away from this, I would hope that it gets people thinking more about these principles beyond just, “How can I get what I want?” I mean, that’s very important. It’s very important to succeed at your job and all the benefits that that can do for, like, college education, vacations, all those things. They’re wonderful. But there’s something that’s more important. And I hope that, having listened to this conversation, they might start thinking more deeply about that.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Brian, thank you.

Brian Ahearn
You’re welcome. It’s always a pleasure to talk with you, Pete.