Tag

KF #38. Optimizes Work Processes Archives - How to be Awesome at Your Job

1099: How to Buy Back Your Time with the Right Assistant with Jess Lindgren

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Music by Breakmaster Cylinder | Sound Design by Cashflow Podcasting

 

Jess Lindgren shares what it takes to build a working relationship that helps give you back your time and focus.

You’ll Learn

  1. The must-have traits of any great assistant
  2. The key to hiring an assistant
  3. Where to find great assistants hiding in your own network

About Jess

Jess Lindgren has worked in the C-Suite of small companies for 20+ years, and developed a diverse skill set by wearing many hats on any given day. She focuses on supporting her current CEO in his many endeavors, works to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of EAs around the world, and has very low tolerance for any meeting that could have been an email. Jess hosts the wildly popular* business podcast, Ask An Assistant.  (*in her Grandpa’s woodshop)

She loves living in Syracuse with her husband and three cats in their century home. An avid fan of putting pen to paper, Jess personally replies to every handwritten letter she receives.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Jess Lindgren Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Jess, welcome!

Jess Lindgren
Pete, thank you so much for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m so excited to get into your wisdom. We are talking about assistance, assisting. Whether you are the assistant or the assisted, I think we’ll have a lot of valuable wisdom to unfold here. And I want to, first, hear, in the assisting game, what is something that has been a surprising learning you’ve picked up that is just transformational, that makes for assistance working great versus not so great?

Jess Lindgren
I think the biggest thing is that people don’t think about this. People don’t think about this more now than they did. I have been an administrative professional, an executive assistant, for over 20 years now, and, things have definitely changed in that time. And people used to be way more focused. And this is general, because people still are focused a lot on hard skills over soft skills.

But people used to get really hung up on, “Oh, well, if you can’t type 90 words per minute,” “If you can’t pass this super nuanced clunky test on Outlook from 1998,” and a lot of those tests are very, like, you can’t do anything with shortcuts. You have to know exactly where to find stuff or you get knocked down on it. Nobody used to care if you were a good fit with your executive.

Like, people would look for executive assistants who were exactly like them, which is kind of the opposite of what you want. Like, you really want somebody that, if this is you, you want an executive assistant who’s going to come in and fill all those gaps for you, right? So, people really never used to focus on soft skills, emotional intelligence, that kind of thing.

And it’s always been something that’s bothered me in my earlier roles that we weren’t a good fit. We didn’t mesh well together. We were a little too similar and kind of butt heads quite a bit. So, that’s really something that I felt from an early time in my career, and have been very fortunate for the last 12 years to be working with somebody who appreciates a good working relationship in terms of emotional intelligence, in terms of soft skills, in terms of fitting better together.

And I do feel like industries as a whole, especially in the entrepreneurial sphere where we find ourselves, people are finding that that’s a much more valuable thing when they look for someone to hire to be their righthand gal or righthand guy.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that makes total sense to me. And to that point about opposites, or filling in gaps, I think that’s fantastic because we humans have this natural affinity for folks who are similar to us and see the world in similar ways to us, and it feels so good. For example, I’m big on ideas, creativity, ideation. That’s really fun for me. And so, if I talk to someone else who’s the same way, it’s very exciting.

Jess Lindgren
Oh, for sure.

Pete Mockaitis
And we’re just like firing out ideas all over the place. And yet, if we wanted to accomplish something, we’re not a great duo.

Jess Lindgren
You need somebody behind the scenes, like kind of pulling you back down to the earth. Like, you’re up there, you’re just floating away with all of these ideas and stuff. And that’s not to say that I don’t have creativity and ideas of my own. They’re just different. So that’s something that’s really, really nice, is to have those, you know, respect for what the person does that I work with for sure.

So, yeah, that creative conversation, like it’s very fun and very important, but it is also good to have somebody, you know, like I said, like you said, filling in those gaps, pulling you back down to the earth and being able to get you on task, like, “Okay, it’s great that we’ve got these ideas, but has anybody written anything down? Have we put anything into the project pipeline? Are we making progress forward?”

And just someone to kind of, “Okay, there’s 20 minutes left of this hour meeting. We need to actually make some progress here.” So, it’s really great to have that give and take, and have somebody who really just kind of fills in your other half. You need that right brain to the left brain, the type A to the type B.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, could you, perhaps, give us a story, illustration, demonstration, example to make it really clear for what does outstanding assistance look like versus what okay assistance looks like?

Jess Lindgren
Okay. Yeah, something that really comes to mind for me is that there are a handful of careers in this world that people think just anyone can plop in and do it. People think that they can do real estate. People think that they can do retail. People think that they can do administrative work. And that’s just not true.

Like, I personally, I cannot go. I worked one. I didn’t even complete the four-hour shift at Victoria’s Secret in college because it didn’t work for me. Like, everything that they were training me to do, I was like, “Nope, this is not for me.” Real estate, you have to have, like, the back of your hand, you have to know, you have to have relationships all over town. I couldn’t do that. I don’t have that breadth and depth of knowledge and relationship the way that really successful real estate agents do.

When it comes to administrative work, it’s a lot of creative thinking. It’s a lot of connecting the dots. It’s a lot of thinking ahead. It’s just skills that not everyone has. So, the okay assistance is the person who says, “Oh, yeah. Well, you know, I’ve been working in sales for like 20 years, and I think I want to pivot and just do administrative work. Like, anybody can do that, right?” Like, people who are just sitting there, trying to bridge a gap.

And, like, I’ve been there. I’ve tried to, I’ve had times in my life where I need to bridge a gap from job to job where you just take whatever is available. But people think that it’s just a job that anybody can do, and that’s just not true. I think you do have to have interest in it. I think that you have to have really sharp critical thinking skills. And I think that you have to really be a helper. Like, you really have to be someone who wants to help, not just someone who wants to come in, cash a paycheck, kind of half-ass it?

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, understood.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, like you really have to have some grit behind you. You have to really be into it, especially to be a career administrative professional.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. So, let’s hear the rundown there. Grit, creativity, interest. What are the other critical components, both in terms of if you’re thinking about a career in assisting, or if you’re thinking, “I need to hire somebody,” what are the top things to be looking out for?

Jess Lindgren
Like I touched on earlier, you’re looking for emotional intelligence, really, because a lot of it is, especially in an executive and/or personal assistant with your executive relationship, there’s a lot of access. You’re in a lot of rooms where a lot of other people aren’t, you know? My last in-office job, I would sit in on weekly board meetings.

I would sit in on meetings with the executives’ direct reports, like they’re director-level people, they’re manager-level people. And you have a lot of access to a lot of information. So, like, you’re looking for confidentiality, discretion. You’re looking for people who just care. You’re looking for people who care. That’s really important.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I’ve heard that’s probably the top theme when people ask me, “So, Pete, how do I be awesome at my job, Pete?”

Jess Lindgren
You care.

Pete Mockaitis
“You’ve done a thousand interviews.” Like, that’s kind of the thing is to care, fundamentally, about the work, about your customers, clients, your colleagues, the product or service you’re delivering. Like, to the extent to which you give a hoot, to the extent to which you get cool creative ideas, to the extent to which you go the extra mile, you try something different, you’re proactive, you’re into it, you’re engaged, versus kind of just chugging along isn’t great for anybody.

Jess Lindgren
Right. And there’s finitely, I’ve had days like that. I’ve had weeks like that. I’ve had months like that, where you are just kind of not engaged or you’re feeling burnt out or whatever. But, like, in the long run, you really do need that interest, that drive, that passion.

And when you are in an entrepreneurial sphere, you need to surround yourself with people who, I mean, A, you need to know what your mission is. Like, you need to know who it is that you’re serving. You need to know why you’re serving them. And you need to be able to articulate that to people when you hire them to work with you, and have it be a very intriguing mission that it is that you’re trying to fulfill.

Pete Mockaitis
And when you say be a helper, tell us about that, because in some ways, every job is being a helper, but I think you mean something specific.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, I mean, even using a salesperson as an example. They’re trying to sell software to a company, or whatever the product might be. So, we’ll just say that this is a software company. They’re trying to help a company make a decision between five different software that are out there that all kind of do the same thing.

But that is still, at the end of the day, kind of a self-serving help. They’re trying to make a commission. They’re trying to make a sale. They’re trying to be number one on the leaderboard. They’re trying to get a bonus at the end of the year, whatever it is. But when it comes to being an executive assistant, being a helper is just so important because, a lot of times, you are the person who is picking up a lot of pieces.

You’re filling in a lot of cracks, and you also have very high standards when it comes to your work. You care about yourself doing a great job. You care about the company succeeding. You care about the executive that you’re supporting being successful. And, yeah, just every successful executive or administrative assistant that I’ve ever met just, like, really cares a lot.

You care about the office looking nice. You care about putting a good presentation, a representation of your company. You care about putting yourself out into the world. You care about, honestly, really great administrative professionals care about doing impactful work. They really do.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, I hear you. And the salesperson, not that those motivations are evil, and, in fact, they’re sometimes extremely helpful. It’s like, “Ooh, this guy is on fire to make it rain. And thank goodness they do.”

Jess Lindgren
Yes. That’s great. Good for them.

Pete Mockaitis

Everyone is able to have paychecks from that revenue generated.

Jess Lindgren

Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
And that variety of motivation and hustle works there, but it’s a very different flavor of motivation and drive than that which is a great fuel for a successful assistant.

Jess Lindgren
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, I’m grooving with it. So, then I’m curious, if one is doing a recruiting process, maybe engaging in some interviews to assess some potential candidates, what are some top approaches for interviews or selection or recruiting that could help us find, indeed, these helpers who really care?

Jess Lindgren

Yes. Okay. So, I have really strong opinions about this, and I’m really glad that you asked. Right now, for anyone who’s out there paying attention, hiring processes are completely out of control. The number of people that I have spoken with who just, “I went through three, four, five, six interviews,” you know, they’re like, “Okay, you’re our top two candidate.”

And then they get ghosted, or then they get like, you know, “Oh, well, we almost picked you,” or, like, someone will come back, you know, three months later, “Well, we picked the other person and they didn’t work out. Are you still interested?” You need to slim down your hiring process. This is not respectful of the candidate’s time. This is not respectful of your time.

What are you doing if you are putting someone else through six rounds of interviews? Like, what is everyone else on your team doing? Your salesperson is not out in the field making sales because they’re sitting there interviewing a candidate. They’re part of the fifth round of the interview and you’ve got 30 candidates, and you’re going to make that salesperson.

Like, the number of people that I’ve spoken with, who are executive assistants, who are looking for work, and they’re just like, “Yeah, I had to meet with the recruiter first, and then I met with the outgoing assistant, and then I met with the sales team, then I met with the marketing team. Like, these are people I’m not even going to work with. Like, why are they putting the whole company through this?”

And if you’re doing this with dozens of candidates every time, that is such a poor use of everyone’s time. And every person right now, they have to take work off. They have to stay late at work because they took a long lunch break to come to your sixth interview, the seventh or eighth or ninth or 10th interview. Like, you need to slim it down. Honestly, every time that I’ve hired someone, I can tell from the time I shake their hand if I like them and feel like it would be a good working relationship or not.

Like, slim it down, make it shorter. You don’t have to purely go on vibes, but, like, hire, what is it that I like to say? Hire slowly, fire quickly.

Pete Mockaitis
It makes sense to me in terms of like, let’s be very thoughtful about who we take on. And if it’s not working out, don’t drag it out for three years.

Jess Lindgren
Exactly. Don’t drag it out. Don’t drag it out for three years. But also, like on the flip side of that so like, what I mean by hire slowly is, like, get somebody in the door, but there is going to be like a ramp-up process, especially when you’re dealing with executive assistants. Like I touched on earlier, you have a lot of access as an executive assistant.

In terms of the hire slowly, fire quickly, I like to say to people, “Give your new assistant the garage code. Don’t necessarily give them the keys to the whole castle.” Like, you can give them some information. You can make the training process, make the onboarding process kind of slow, methodical, thought out.

But make the hiring process itself, like have a clear job description, but know that there’s a lot of room for nuance, that things are always going to shift, especially with an executive administrative or personal assistant. There’s always going to be things that you didn’t think of, that you didn’t know you needed help with, that you didn’t know they could do, that you could hand off to them.

Like, just know that it’s a living document, that it’s something that you’re going to need to update as time goes on. But really, strip that hiring process down. It’s not a good use of anybody’s time. Make a decision, roll with it. But that’s what probationary periods are for. That’s what that onboarding time is for, is to get to know them, see if it’s a good fit.

I’ve certainly had people who came very highly recommended, who interviewed very well, and then performed very poorly. And that’s where the hire slowly, fire quickly comes in. Like, I hadn’t bought them a new computer. I hadn’t bought them a ton of software. I hadn’t given them access to everything, but, like, I did make a decision, hire them, bring them on. And then I’m just like, “Well, this isn’t working out. Sorry.”

Pete Mockaitis
Understood. Okay. So, you’re saying, let’s not do nine interviews, but rather, let’s give someone a shot, do the probationary period, and then that goes well, we really say, “Okay, here’s more access, here’s more things.”

Jess Lindgren
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
What are some key things that might show up as indicators that, “Ooh, this person seems special out of the pack, and, thus, it likely warrants to advance to the probationary period”?

Jess Lindgren
Yes. I mean, I think a lot of it is just looking for that caring, looking for them filling in gaps, looking for them noticing things when they say, “Hey, Pete, we’ve been working together for a couple of weeks here. I’ve noticed that you have X, Y, Z thing. Have you ever thought about doing it this other way?”

So, looking for people who really care about not necessarily that everything needs to get totally optimized and automated, but, like, sometimes things are too close. Like, you’re too close to things to even notice that there’s an issue, and you just do things that way because that’s how they’ve always been done.

And then when someone brings their specific experience, their specific expertise to the table, listen when they have ideas, implement what makes sense, but really look for them caring. They want you to have more time.

If you’re the salesperson of the company, they want you to have two extra hours in your day to be focusing on your job because you’re doing something inefficiently, or maybe doing something that’s not impactful, something that doesn’t even really need to be done anymore, something that’s outdated. Look for them making suggestions that make everyone do a better job. Like, that’s really important.

Pete Mockaitis
And so then, back into the interview, of which there might just be one or two and not nine, there might be some questions along those lines, like, “Tell me about a time that you noticed an opportunity for improvement, and what you noticed, and how you communicated it, and what happened.” And so, it was like, “Oh, shucks, that’s never happened before.” It’s like, “Oh, well, maybe we should go with someone else.”

Jess Lindgren
Maybe it’s a different, yes, maybe you go with a different candidate if that’s never happened. Process evaluation and improvement is, honestly, my favorite thing to do. I’m constantly just like, “Okay, we did it this way. It turned out okay. Is there anything we could have done better?”

Pete Mockaitis

I like that. And then, so I think, as we talked about recruiting, hiring, we were thinking about it perhaps from a vantage point of a dedicated, full-time, or many hours of time person. I guess in the universe of acquiring assistance, I suppose there’s a whole spectrum from a full-time, 40 hours plus a week person, like on site, to remote, to asking a bot to do a thing, or asking a service. How would you lay out the spectrum or continuum of assistance? And what answer is probably right for what needs?

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, that is a wide spectrum. So, there are lots and lots of options out there. I will say that a bot, or your average ChatGPT or AI, I am not a fan. I really think work like this is nuanced. Like, people in the executive assistant sphere are, “Oh, my God, AI is going to take our job.” No, it’s not. It’s fine. Like, there’s way too much nuance in a lot of work.

And if the things that you need help with are things that can be automated by a bot, or an AI, you don’t need an assistant. But I do think that most organizations and most individuals, especially individuals running companies, really could benefit from having one, whether it’s five hours a week to 40 plus. When you get into that 40 plus timeframe, hire a second person. It is absolutely unfair to have, like, I’ve worked 60-hour weeks. It’s not fun or cute for anybody.

Your productivity, your effectiveness, your efficiency, totally starts to drain once you’re past like 35 to 40 hours a week. It just, it’s not sustainable, you know? But, yeah, there’s definitely opportunities. There’s virtual assistants based out of the Philippines. Like, that’s a very strong industry at this point. It was definitely something, when I started my company back in 2014, it was, “How do I differentiate myself?”

Like, VAs out of the Philippines were newer. But like, “How do I differentiate myself as the in-person personal and executive assistant here in the United States who is not charging $5 an hour? Like, how do I?” Because it is different. It’s a very different service. It’s a very different product that I have to offer.

And, yeah, you still can, like it’s a much more developed and stronger industry. People based in other countries outside of the US have seized the opportunity. I don’t want to say taken advantage of the opportunity because that’s not the right wording, but like seized the opportunity. There’s a demand, and people are meeting it. And I’ve heard nothing but wonderful experiences that people have had with virtual assistants based out of other countries.

And you can get five hours a week. You can get 20 hours because you had a busy month or maybe you had a launch coming up. You can hire someone for 40 plus, like that’s, honestly, how I started working with my current executive, is he hired me for a one-off project. And after that one-off project was done, he was like, “Well, do you want to help me maintain it?” because I was hired to tame his inbox.

Like, we went from 9,000 unread emails to inbox zero. And he was just like, “Well, you cleaned it up. Like, I can’t maintain this. Like, can I hire you to stick around? Can you do 10 hours a week for me ongoing?” And I was like, “Absolutely.” And then 10 turned to 15, 15 turned to 20, 20 turned to 60. I hired that second person, and then you adjust from there.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, that’s beautiful. And kudos to jobs well done. I mean, that’s often the reward for great work, is more work.

Jess Lindgren
It is more work. But, you know, when it’s work that you love, it is a reward.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. So then, we talked about there’s full-time, there’s half-time, there’s other countries like the Philippines, there’s the bots can do what the bots can do, but they are limited, all right.

Jess Lindgren
Very limited.

Pete Mockaitis
And so then, I’ve heard there are a number of services. I’ve tried Fancy Hands, and it’s quite limited.

Jess Lindgren
Okay, that’s a new one to me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, the nature of the tasks were limited, in that they’re like 15-minute requests. So often, like it’s really crap shoot. It’s kind of like an Uber situation. It was like, you’ll get who you get and, hopefully, they’re with it. But it’s hard to say, “Oh, you’re great. Let’s keep doing the thing.” It’s like, “Well, no, you might get me next time. You might not.”

Jess Lindgren
Oh, you might never get them again. Interesting. So, it’s not something where you can say, “Okay, Jess did a great job. Five stars. I want her again.” Interesting. Fancy Hands. I’ll have to look into that.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, so it’s very limited, such that I’ve actually had a hard time using my requests, and I’ll probably be canceling them shortly. So, are there any other services or resources or directories or agencies or spots folks can go, and say, “Oh, they usually have some great folks”?

Jess Lindgren
You know, there are agencies out there, the ones that I have personal experience with, and the ones that I’m familiar with are, unfortunately, out of business.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, bummer.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, so I don’t have specific agencies, necessarily, to recommend at this point, but I can say that there are more people who would be great at being an assistant in your network than you probably could ever imagine.

Like, the number of people who have a kid in college, who has 10 hours a week to give you, or the stay-at-home mom who’s been out of the workforce for a number of years, and, thankfully, kind of like the emotional intelligence piece, like people place more importance on the emotional intelligence piece. People are less, like there used to be a big stigma if you had a huge gap on your resume like that.

But people are really coming around to, “Okay, a stay-at-home parent is, like, the perfect person to hire for a role like this because they are managing a household, they’re managing children’s schedules, they’re managing all, they’re feeding however many people, however many meals every single day, they’re staying on top of laundry.”

Like, being a stay-at-home parent is a whole huge job and a really untapped market. Like, you just never know who has, like a friend of mine, their youngest just went to kindergarten this year, so all three kids are, like, eighth grade, fourth grade, kindergarten. All of a sudden, the stay-at-home parent has two, three hours a day where they could pick up some work, if someone had it available for them.

So, really, I like to recommend that people just put out, especially when you’re in a position where you have a podcast, you have a newsletter, you have social media, “Hey, friends, hi, I’m Taylor Swift, and I’m asking the Swifties. I’m looking for, hey, Swifties, I’m looking for an assistant for 10 hours a week. Who can help?” Taylor Swift is going to get a slightly different response than you or I would, you know?

Pete Mockaitis
“Ahh!!”

Jess Lindgren
And, Taylor, if you’re hiring, hello. But just, like, ask, and you just never know. Like, that’s how I ended up in the role that I have, is I wrote an email, I quit my job, I threw a party and just told everybody I knew about it and I was like, “Hey, you should come to this party, and here’s what I’m doing. I’m, basically, what people now might call a fractional executive assistant.”

So, I was like, “Fractional executive assistant work. And I guarantee, if I can’t do what you need, I know somebody who does.” And 15 minutes after I sent that email, someone reached out to me, and said, “We have a job for you.” And 12 years later, I’m still doing that job.

Like, the power of networking is so real and you will see people all the time say, “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know.” That’s unfortunate because not everybody knows everybody. But when you do know some people, it can be very nice and very cool.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I’m thinking about my buddy, Scott, mentioned, I think, one of his kids’ friend’s moms, they just had a number of very pleasant exchanges with her, and she indicated that she was looking for some stuff to do, I think, with kids in school situation. And they said, “Well, hey, maybe you could help us with this and this and this.”

And now, there’s like just a growing list of, she does all these things that make their life work in terms of, “Well, hey, could you help coordinate some things with our Airbnb property? And could you coordinate these Amazon returns?” And so, there’s like a dozen bullet points or more by now. And so, it just seems like, “Are you a billionaire, Scott?”

He’s like, “No, no, he’s not. But he’s found someone delightful who does have that helper’s heart, who just enjoys doing this, and they appreciate just the heck out of her,” because, like, “Oh, my gosh, our lives are so much less stressful and more wonderful because you’re in it. Thank you.” And she’s happy to help, and, it’s win, win, win, win.

Jess Lindgren
Yes, that’s the phrase I tell to everybody. Like, anybody reaches out, and I’m like, “Happy to help. I’m going to write a book someday. Put a pin in that.” But truly, like, everybody brings different skills and different tools to the table. Money is a tool. Stop hoarding it. Start using it to make your life better.

And the stay-at-home parent who was looking for a few things to do, as their responsibilities at home start to change, as the kids get older and maybe graduate, go off to college, all of a sudden that person has more time, effort, and energy to put into their work. You can take more things off of the person that you’re working with. You can take more things off their plate. And it’s a very reciprocal symbiotic relationship. And, yeah, it can be really great for everybody.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, let’s talk about the assistance and the assisted relationship, and that doesn’t necessarily need to be an executive, per se. I think there was even a piece recently in the Wall Street Journal or New York Times about how, “Hey, normal professionals are hiring assistants now, and it’s just so great.” So that’s cool.

The term executive assistant is, I don’t even know, if it’s the one to use. You may or not be an executive and assistance is great for you, regardless. So, tell us, within the relationship, what are some top dos or don’ts? What are things that drive you and other assistants just nuts, like, “Don’t ever do this. This is so, I don’t know, demeaning or frustrating or annoying.”

Jess Lindgren
Ooh, those are good questions. So, really, I just touched on this. Money is a tool, don’t be stingy. Pay your assistant well, pay them better than you think. You’re going to get what you pay for. If your budget is $5 an hour, you’re going to get very different service than if your budget is $150 an hour. And, like, that’s what I charge and that’s what I get paid, and that’s what I do. I mean, depending on the project.

But, you know, like your budget is very different and you’re going to get people who can prioritize things differently for you. So, like, really, if you, as an executive, I mean, even if you’re not like an executive-executive. You are the executive of your home. You can call them personal assistant, if executive assistant feels wrong. You can just say assistant. Like, we don’t really get super hung up on titles, but, like, pay them well.

If you’re some Fortune 500 executive-level, director-level, manager-level person who’s pulling in $500,000 a year, you have a budget to pay for someone good, and you’re going to get what you want the better that you pay. So don’t be stingy. You also need to not be a micromanager. You need to understand that people who are assistants are professionals. We’re good at what we do, especially when you’re talking with somebody like me who has been doing this for 20 years.

I am fantastic at what I do. You can give me very vague instructions. You can throw me into the deep end. I’m going to swim. It’s fine. You don’t need to hire me slowly. You can just bring me on and say, “Okay, here’s this whole backlog of tasks. Start wading through things.” Like, I love fixing problems. I love untangling messes. I love doing those things that feel so impossible to you, that feel your to-do list is just, it’s a list of things for me to just check boxes off of.

It doesn’t have the same emotional weight or stress associated with it for me. So don’t be stingy. Don’t be a micromanager. Like, tell me what you need done and then trust that it’ll get done. If it doesn’t get done, you’re going to know about it and then you can step in and micromanage, or whatever. But, like, back off.

Like, tell us what you need us to do and then let us do it. Give us some breathing room because we’re professionals and we’re good at it.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, I guess I’m thinking about the universe of expectations. And, for example, and I don’t know if this is a dated reference. But, I think, I’ve heard instances of, “Oh, if someone is getting coffee and getting dry cleaning, like that’s demeaning and beneath them.”

But, in other ways, another way of viewing it, it’s like, “Oh, that’s exactly what is needed and is helpful for that person at that time.” And so, I guess I’m guessing, you tell me, that whether that is or is not appropriate or, you know, “Pick my kids up from daycare,” or school, or karate lessons, really just depends on communicating those expectations upfront, and seeing if that’s a fit.

Like, you know, “Actually, driving kids around is something I can’t stand doing for whatever reason. They’re noisy and they are sticky.” Or, like, “Oh, how delightful. I get to spend some time with these precious cherubs.” So, I’m guessing that’s a do is to be clear about expectations and get aligned, and you can be able to share either way, like, “Actually, that’s kind of outside of our scope and not really in my zone of skills,” and just doing that dance.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah. So, that really is communicating what the job description is, because when you say executive assistant, that has the connotation of being, at least in the United States, you know, other countries like the UK, if you have seen any references to this at all, whether in the business world or the entertainment sphere, you’ll see people talking about their PA, their personal assistant.

So, in other countries, the title does mean something different. But here in the United States, executive assistant has the connotation of being a person who helps you with your professional life. Whereas, a personal assistant is the person who helps you with your personal life, or your assistant, again, whatever title it is that you’re going to give it.

I talk a lot about your time split, like how your job is split between professional and personal responsibilities. In my present role, it’s like a 95-5 professional to personal split. So, like 95% of the time, I’m doing professional stuff, and there’s a pretty, not a hard line, but like I don’t do any of the personal stuff, and that’s fine.

And I’ve also had roles where it’s like 95-5 the other direction. I’m just doing personal stuff. I’m helping you with, like one of my favorite things I ever did. I got hired to help someone hire and manage a plumber. They had a leak under their sink. So, like, I had to vet the different people who were available. Thankfully, I had a plumber that I loved.

So, I just hired them, came over, had to buy them, you know, they’re like, “I need a new vacuum. I need a new cat tree. I need a new…” whatever. So, like, got to knock everything out, like had everything delivered to the house the day that I was coming to manage the plumber. Got to just sit at the house and manage this service person, while they were there. And then I got to take their Instagram celebrity cat to the vet.

And so, you know, like sometimes it can be, I think that stuff is really fun and really cool. There are people who do not want the responsibility of being in charge of someone’s pet, being in charge of someone’s children. So, like, just making sure that the job description is clear from the get-go of what it is that you, the person needs help with, and what you are expecting the assistant to do, because you can also hire five-hour a week professional support and 10-hour a week personal support.

I like what you said, though, about things that are considered dehumanizing. I don’t find it dehumanizing when somebody, when my executive, like in my current role, when we work together in person, a lot of it is making sure that he is fed and hydrated and caffeinated. And that’s not offensive to me. I love doing that stuff. By feeding him and giving him coffee, he’s able to do his job. Like, that is not offensive.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, that’s, “How Pat going to be ‘super stoked’ if one of these fundamental needs are missing?”

Jess Lindgren
Right? Like, this is just basic needs. Like, his shelter is taken care of because I got him a hotel room. His food needs are taken care of because I, literally, scheduled into his day, “Okay, here’s where you have a break. Here’s where you’re going to eat a Caesar chicken salad.” And I have protein bars in my bag. Like, that’s not offensive to me.

But some people, that would be very offensive. What is very offensive across the board is people not having their tempers in check, “I’m not your mother. I’m not your wife. I’m not your teacher. I’m not your daycare provider. Like, grow up.” That is absolutely unacceptable. I don’t care what it is that’s frustrating you. You need to have your temper in check.

And if that’s not something, that not a skill that you currently have, you need to work on that. And you need to hire somebody else who is fine getting yelled at. Like, treat people with basic respect. I have been yelled at. I have had things thrown at me.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, jeez.

Jess Lindgren
Like, seriously, I have had people, you know, throw a sheaf of papers, like, right into my face. And I’m like, “That is unacceptable.” So, like, have your temper in check, have your behavior in check. This is either a professional office or it might be inside of your personal home. But when you are bringing someone in as a hired professional, whatever that profession is, get it together.

That’s the dehumanizing stuff. That’s the unacceptable stuff. The number of times I’ve heard from assistants that, “I got yelled at yesterday, and it was worse than last week.” And I’m just like, “This is escalation. This is abusive. This is not okay. And, like, don’t tolerate that in the workplace.” But, like, also, if you’re the person who’s hiring the assistant, don’t act like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, absolutely.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, that’s the unacceptable stuff. Like, anything else, like job duty-wise can definitely be negotiated. And if you don’t, as the assistant, want to be the person who gets the coffee or the dry cleaning, it’s 2025. Like, Uber Eats is a thing. There’s plenty of services that will deliver your dry cleaning.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s right, “I will coordinate the delivery services associated with these tasks and forward you the bill.”

Jess Lindgren
Yes, you can be the person who does the project management of it, right? But you don’t have to be the person physically going to the coffee shop. You don’t have to be the person carrying the dry cleaning down the street. Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
And when you brought up those examples of the plumber and the cat, and you mentioned that, “It’s your to-do list. I don’t have any emotional pulls associated with it,” I think that’s a really great concept to highlight here, is that there are many things that I think we’re capable of doing, but we have some sort of emotional resistance.

And so, like, I’m thinking about, “Oh, I should probably upgrade my video backdrop, but that feels like such a project. And I’m going to have to talk to a dozen different salespeople who are going to ask about my needs and my desires and my measurements.” And because I just have emotional resistance, like I’ve been dragging my feet, I haven’t really done it.

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, for sure.

Pete Mockaitis
And yet, if someone else who’s just like, “Okay, I feel totally neutral about that. I would be happy to pull together all of those options and go through that legwork of talking to those people and relaying those measurements and your preferences a dozen times so as to find a winning option for you.”

Jess Lindgren
Yeah. And the other thing that a great assistant will do is say, “You know what, Pete, you don’t have to take a dozen meetings for that. You need to take three to five meetings. You need to pick the person who…you know, I’m already lowering your ceiling of 12. I’ve lowered your ceiling to five. I’m not going to talk to more than five people.”

And if I already have a service provider or, “Oh, hey, I had a video backdrop created. Just last year I have a great service in mind.” Now you’re talking to zero people. You’re just giving me a credit card so I can order it for you.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Beautiful. Well, tell me, Jess, are there any other key things to keep in mind before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Jess Lindgren
Key things to keep in mind is just, I really love to recommend to people that, when they’re getting ready to hire an assistant, it means that they have been ready for six months to a year. So, like, it’s time if you’re really thinking about it, that means that you have been ready for a while. I want you to talk with the people that you work with.

So, if you are the manager of a department, talk to all the people that you interact with for a week, just say, “Hey, if I was going to hire an assistant, what do you think I need help with? What do you think I could offload from my plate?” And you just never know what things that you, I don’t want to say complain about, but like what things do you say like, “Ugh, it’s time to do the TPS reports.”

Like, maybe you need somebody that you can hire that can help you do the TPS reports. And, again, you’re too close to it. You’re too in it. You are just in it. You’re bogged down by the emotional weight of everything that you have outstanding to do, and it’s hard to even know what you might need help with. So, ask the people around you that you work with.

Ask the people around you at home, because you definitely don’t know, what are you letting off steam about to your spouse, to your children, to your friends, to your family? What did they hear when they say, “How’s work going, Pete?” And all they hear about is the quarterly inventory night or whatever.

Like, your assistant could come in and totally revamp the process to the point where you get excited about doing quarterly inventory, because now that it’s been evaluated and optimized, it’s, all of a sudden, really exciting and everybody orders pizza and it only takes three hours when it used to take eight. And now it’s like a big company party because you hired this person to come in and help you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, I like that a lot. And I think that this notion of the emotional weight of things is powerful in terms of it’s not just a one to one, you know, hour-dollar exchange situation. Because if you have a lot of emotional angst associated with, “Oh, I’m dreading this, leading up to it. And then, afterwards, I’m so drained from having done it. And then I’m complaining about it.”

It’s like, you may have paid for one hour of services that goes away from your plate onto the assistant’s plate. And yet, that has freed up more than an hour of product goodness in your world.

Jess Lindgren
Yes. Yes, absolutely. And, like, the other thing I really like to tell people is make a list, no matter how big or how small, because you touched on this, too, that there’s a lot of people who feel like, “Oh, well, I should,” or, “I already know how to do this. Why can’t I fit this in?” Everybody needs rest and recovery time. And so, you are buying time, you’re buying services, you’re buying expertise from someone who can help you.

And again, it’s 2025, almost 2026, some crazy how. There is no shortage, depending on where you live, of things that you can hire out. There’s a really great site called Care.com. It definitely is geared more toward housekeepers, nannies, that kind of role. You don’t know what retired grandma, that lives right around the corner from you, wants 15 hours a week, of picking the kids up from their activities, folding your laundry, and making dinner for everybody.

You just don’t know until you pay Care.com for a subscription, you invest the money, because Care.com is going to give you, like they do the vetting, they do the, you know, they’re saying, “Okay, here’s the five candidates that we think, based on what you’re looking for help with, that you might like.” You, ultimately, have to interview them, make the decision.

But, like, Care.com, they’re the hub for you, where the people come that are looking for work. When you ask your network, when you say, “You know, these are the things that’s kind of a weird mishmash of personal and professional stuff that I need help with,” you don’t know who has five or 10 or 15 hours, and who has what expertise and interests to bring to the table for you. Ask.

Pete Mockaitis
Perfect. Thank you. Now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Jess Lindgren
Yeah, absolutely. My favorite quote is from Leslie Knope, the character from Parks and Rec, “One person’s annoying is another person’s inspiring and heroic.”

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Jess Lindgren
A favorite study. So, I really love the Pareto principle, the 80-20 rule. Just 80% of your client, like, especially as an administrative professional, 80% of the emails I receive, one minute less don’t even need to be answered. Twenty percent of those emails are going to take up 80% of my time. It’s just all day, every day.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And a favorite book?

Jess Lindgren
I really read a lot of fiction. I am a huge The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy gal.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And a favorite habit?

Jess Lindgren
Favorite habit. I love to get enough sleep and drink enough water and get enough exercise.

Pete Mockaitis

Agree. And is there a key nugget you share that is frequently quoted back to you, a Jess original that people find so delightful?

Jess Lindgren
I would say the biggest thing that I put out into the world is the five W’s, the who, what, when, where, why of it all. Like, really, just any problem, any situation, can be solved or enjoyed or put together with the who, what, when, where, why of it all.

Pete Mockaitis
And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Jess Lindgren
I would love it if you checked out my website JessLindgren.com, J-E-S-S L-I-N-D-G-R-E-N.com.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Jess Lindgren
People looking to be awesome at their jobs, stay hungry and stay foolish.

1073: How to Cut Clutter and Distraction from Your Life with Shira Gill

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Shira Gill shares minimalist strategies for reducing both physical and mental clutter.

You’ll Learn

  1. The hidden costs of clutter
  2. Why organizing tools won’t help you—and what will
  3. The easiest way to make your space feel less overwhelming

About Shira

Shira Gill is a world-renowned organizing expert and the bestselling author of three books: Minimalista, Organized Living, and LifeStyled. She’s a sought-after expert for media outlets and has been featured by Good Morning America, The Wall Street Journal, TIME, People, Forbes, goop, Architectural Digest, Oprah Daily, Vogue, and The New York Times. Her popular newsletter The Life Edit inspires readers from all 50 states and 150 countries.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Plaud.AiUse the code AWESOME for a discount on your order
  • Rula. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at Rula.com/Awesome

Shira Gill Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Shira, welcome!

Shira Gill
Thank you. I’m happy to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to hear about your wisdom because, well, I think home organization is generally fun, and when I go to The Container Store, it is genuinely exciting. However, we’re talking about being awesome at your job, so I’d love it if you could make the connection for us here. In the universe of organization and minimalism, how does that have impact on our professional experiences and ability to be awesome?

Shira Gill
So, I use principles of minimalism and my expertise as a pro-organizer to help people gain clarity, clear clutter, and streamline and simplify everything. So, that’s from home and wardrobe to life and business.

And as an entrepreneur myself, I’ve run a business for 15 years. So, I have found how to leverage minimalism in organization to really dial down on what are the things that are most essential and what can I let go of. And it’s the number one tool that I use to work more efficiently and even joyfully.

Pete Mockaitis
Whew. Let’s talk about joy first. How does that increase our joy?

Shira Gill
So, I think we have so much coming at us all the time. Everyone I know is feeling that their lives are overstuffed, over-scheduled, they’re oversaturated. And it’s hard to feel joyful when you feel bombarded by clutter. And that can be digital clutter, physical clutter, mental and emotional clutter. My work helps people deal with every type of clutter. And I think when we feel like we’re drowning, we can’t be the best versions of ourselves.

And so, I think there’s this myth that, in order to feel better, look better, be better, we have to have more, we have to do more. And what I have found in my now 15 years as a professional organizer, a minimalist, as an author who writes about simplicity, is that the converse is actually true, is that the less we own, the more liberated we can feel, the more time and spaciousness we have for the things that matter most, for the things we care about deeply.

And so, most of my work, really, is about helping people cut the clutter and clear the distraction to enable them to do the things they actually care about and enjoy.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, you said minimalism is the number one tool. I think of minimalism as a philosophy or perspective or value, but you’ve used the word tool, which I find intriguing. Can you expand on that?

Shira Gill
Absolutely, yeah. So, for me, minimalism is, I define it as being radically intentional. So, when I say that it’s a tool, it’s like the intentionality tool, right? So, not just with the things you own, but with how you spend your time, your resources, your energy. It’s really a tool to help you clarify what’s important so you can cut the clutter and distraction that stands in the way.

So, I think about everything in my life through this lens of minimalism and intentionality, and it helps streamline and simplify decision-making. It helps me decide where to allocate my resources. It helps me decide which projects I want to dig into and which I want to say no to. So, it’s really, it is a tool that people, I think, don’t realize is at their disposal anytime they want.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, could you perhaps tell us a tale of a person who applied this tool and saw some really cool results that showed up in their professional world as well?

Shira Gill
Absolutely. Yeah. So, I had a client, Elizabeth, and she had always wanted to be an executive coach. She wanted to work out of her home. She had three young kids. And her home, in her words, looked like a preschool had exploded. And so, she didn’t have the confidence or the focus or the clarity to get cracking on this business.

And so, what we did together is we said, “What would an executive coach’s workspace look like and feel like? How would you be able to show up, that you can’t show up in the way that you want now?” And so, what we did is we took what was her kind of guest room that had turned into a dumping ground of playthings and toy mats and diapers, and we cleared it all out. We probably donated half of it.

And then we kind of reallocated and relocated things to other parts of her home, like her kids’ room and her playroom. And we set up a really streamlined simple office space for her. So, she had a desk, she had a monitor, she had a speaker and headphones, and the kind of bare bones minimum thing so that she could go on podcasts, she could have client meetings.

And what happened was, as soon as her space changed, her motivation changed and her sense of empowerment to do this job that she had always wanted to do shifted. And so, she started putting herself out there. She started going on podcasts. And it really was about affecting change from the outside in, like she felt completely paralyzed and, like, she couldn’t work. She didn’t have the confidence.

And just by carving out a slice of real estate in her home that felt clutter-free and organized and professional, she was able to leverage that to start her dream business, and she now does that full time from her home.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I love so much what you said there about change from the outside in. It can happen. And we had Dr. Srini Pillay on the show talk about a term he used, psychological Halloween-ism, in which that can show up with what you wear. You put on a blazer jacket, like, “Ooh, I feel professional.” You put on your dance pants, you’re ready to go out to the club or whatever, and you’re in maybe more of a playful and adventurous kind of a mood. So, that could happen with our dress.

And you’re saying that could happen with our space. And it’s really intriguing, I’d love to dive into some of the distinctions here because if…I’m thinking about exercise equipment. Like, that’s an example of where that tends to often not work. It’s like, “Hey, I bought a treadmill, I bought a weight bench and some adjustable dumbbells, and now, because my space is all set up to exercise, I’m going to be exercising all the time.”

And yet, in practice, often these devices end up holding clothing instead of holding our bodies as we get fitter. Is there a difference or a distinction that we can dig into and unpack? Like, what makes one more effective than the other and why?

Shira Gill
Yeah, it’s super interesting because I have found that if I like my workout wear, I do want to work out more. So, I guess that’s not about buying, like investing in a new gadget or a new trend, right? Like, those efforts typically do seem to fail.

But I have found that if I, instead of wearing like the schlubby pajamas or the loungewear from college, that if I put on like a really sharp workout outfit, like I’ve got my spandex on, I’ve got my like really supportive sneakers, suddenly, I actually feel like being more active. So, that has been effective for me.

I think what is not effective that I see a lot in my work is people trying to become organized by buying organizational gear or gadgets. And you had mentioned The Container Store earlier. I think one of the biggest mistakes I actually see in my work is people saying, “I’m going to go get organized,” and they run out to The Container Store and they buy a million organizing products.

So, they buy, like, bins and baskets and hangers and drawer dividers, and they get home and they wonder why they’re not organized. And the reason is that organization is a skill which is as simple as grouping similar things together and making sure that every category has a home. And so, if we bring more things into our home, now we have more to organize.

And one of the biggest things I see, ironically, is organizing products covered in dust that never got used because they were bought kind of in a vacuum without a purpose. So, what I caution people is to always start by editing and decluttering. There’s a saying in my field, “Organized clutter is still clutter.” So, you don’t want to organize things in your workspace or in your home before you’ve really thoughtfully gone through and decluttered and edited and made careful decisions about, “What are the things I need to do my job effectively? What are the things that are just taking up space or collecting dust?”

And a really concrete example of this is, I used to have a home office, I have two, now, teenage daughters, and they rallied together and wrote me a letter saying, “We would like to each have our own rooms, and we don’t think you need an office anymore.” And so, I really thought about this.

Pete Mockaitis
My kids are young. I’m thinking, “Oh, wow, is this my future?”

Shira Gill
Oh, yeah, it is.

Pete Mockaitis

They will gang up on me and craft correspondence to get their room.

Shira Gill
That’s right. Yes, there will be convincing articles written and cases laid out. So, my kids are very convincing, and they convinced me that if they had their own spaces, they would be more independent, they could have privacy, all of these things, right? And so, what it caused me to do is to look around. I had a proper office. Like, I had a workspace with a desk and a file cabinet and office supplies.

And what I realized, when I decided to take them up on this and give them their own rooms and downsize all of my stuff, so now I work at the dining room table or, you know, a shared workspace elsewhere, is that all that I needed to be able to do my job was a laptop, a microphone, and a notebook.

And so, I ended up selling and downsizing and donating pretty much like 95% of the things that I had in my home office, and now my entire office can fit in a tote bag. And what it did is it actually, ironically, gave me this huge sense of freedom to know I can work anywhere in the world. I can pack up my laptop and I can go work out of a hotel. I can work out of a cafe.

And so, I think when we think about organizing, we think about it wrong. I didn’t need to organize more. I needed to edit and declutter and be really thoughtful about assessing, “What are my tools so that I can do my job?”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, that’s really interesting.

Shira Gill
Are you looking around your workspace?

Pete Mockaitis
I think that just the timing is hilarious because I just recently had four strong men haul a massive sound-blocking door to outfit a better recording studio space for me to move into, kind of the opposite.

Shira Gill

That’s fair. Maybe you needed that.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, I guess need is so subjective, just like, “The audio quality will be superior and it has benefits,” but I think you’re highlighting, well, it also is, there are other benefits associated with moving in the exact opposite direction. And so, it’s thought-provoking.

Shira Gill
Yeah, I mean, what I find, having been in people’s homes for the past 15 years, is most of us have so many things that we don’t need or use that add zero value to our lives and our careers.

So, like, a prime example is most people that I have met with have an entire collection, like an Office Depot-size collection of things that have kind of been rendered obsolete, like highlighters and Sharpies and Post-its and staplers and binder clips, when most of us are working in this digital world.

And so, I just find it really interesting to question, like, “If I had to go do my job tomorrow, what are the things that I need in front of me to get that job done? And what are the things that, really, are just collecting dust that could better serve, I don’t know, maybe a school or a nonprofit or a theater or a community center who may use those things?” For me, I was, frankly, shocked to learn that I didn’t need 95% of the things that I owned.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, so let’s zoom way in on the stapler, because I love office supply stores, too. So, if we use a stapler three times a year, are we better off not having a stapler?

Shira Gill
Yeah, I love that question. It’s very personal for each person, right? So, for me, probably not. I live in a small house, so I should clarify. I live in a house that’s 120 years old. It’s about a thousand square feet. I share it with three other people – my husband, two teenagers, and a dog. And it has almost no storage space. It’s a very charming craftsman bungalow, but it was built in a different time, right?

So, for me, my goal is kind of, like, “How much can I get away with not owning?” I’m really on one end of the spectrum. For someone else, it may seem too inconvenient to borrow a stapler or have to figure out a stapler those three times a year. And if they have plenty of space in their workspace, that stapler is not hurting or harming anyone.

So, one of the questions I always have people ask is, like, “Would you rather have the stuff or the space?” And I think that can be really clarifying. For me, I really value space and spaciousness in my home and in my life.

And so, nine times out of 10, if I’m questioning something, I’ll decide to live without it. And if I need it, I’ll get scrappy and resourceful and borrow it from a neighbor or from my husband’s workplace, something like that. That’s worth it to me.

For someone else, they might value convenience more than they value having a little extra space. So, it is a very customizable framework.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, yes, the stuff or the space. And it’s interesting, I’d love if you could speak to our human psyches or the research on this. It’s, like, I feel better in a space that is less cluttered. And think that’s, generally, a nearly universal human sentiment.

And, personally, I feel really awesome. I think about speaking. When I am invited to a keynote speech and I am there early in the auditorium and it’s just vast emptiness, there’s like nothing but space – empty stage, empty chairs. And it’s like, “The room is all mine.”

And I don’t know if it’s just the impact of being in a non-cluttered space multiplied by 10. Or, what’s going on here? But since, Shira, you study this stuff and teach it, what is going on here?

And, as we make that choice, “Do I want the stuff or the space?” how do I properly value the benefit of space, even though it’ll vary person by person?

Shira Gill

So, what we know about clutter is that over 80% of people experience stress and anxiety directly linked to physical clutter. So, part of why this is, if we just break it down, is that if you think about being in a cluttered room, every single item in that room is something that our brain has to process.

So, even if we don’t think, “I’m thinking about all these things or these piles,” on a subconscious level, our brain is having to work overtime, processing it as information, right? So, when you walk into that empty room, there’s almost nothing for your brain to process, which means your brain actually gets a break, which feels like relief and ease. And who doesn’t want more of that?

And so, I think what I realized, as a busy working mom, is there’s always stuff coming at me. There’s a long to-do lists, there’s errands, there’s driving carpool, there’s all of the things, all of the input that’s coming at me all the time, and most of which I don’t have control over. But what I do have control over is my physical environment and how I curate it and what I put in it and what I say, “I’m not going to bring this through the front door.”

And what I’ve realized is that the less that I own, the less that I have in front of me, the more relaxed I feel, the more clarity I feel, and the more efficient I can be. And so, I think that’s the thing, is clutter has a big cost, and I’ve seen it in my work, not just this kind of emotional toll of feeling stressed out or overwhelmed, but I’ve seen a huge relationship cost to clutter.

It’s one of the hottest topics in a family of having different clutter thresholds and different ideas of what being organized looks like. It can lead to huge fights and friction between partners, spouses, kids and their parents. And so, by eliminating some of that clutter, you are eliminating this incredible toll and cost that most of us feel every day.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And so, then it sounds like, according to this, every bit helps.

Shira Gill
Every bit helps, yeah, absolutely.

Pete Mockaitis
In terms of it might be hard to go from clutter to Marie Kondo-nirvana in a day or even a week or month. But every morsel will be appreciable to our brains.

Shira Gill
Absolutely. And I think I’m clearly on one far end of the spectrum. Like, my children and my husband think I’m crazy, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Well, they got their own room out of it. I mean, I think a lot of parents are like, “Nope, this office is what puts this roof over your head, girl. So, get some bunk beds or figure something out, you know?”

Shira Gill
That’s exactly right. Yes, they should show me a lot of gratitude for that. But I think, like, I can recognize, look, I am a minimalist in a world that values maximalism, in a world that tells you to consume more and buy more and do more. I’m going the opposite route intentionally. But what I’ve seen, working with all of these different types of individuals and families, is that I have yet to meet someone who says, “I have the perfect amount of stuff for me.”

And I think that’s the goal that we want to strive towards, is not “Having the perfect amount for me, Shira,” but having the perfect amount for you in your life circumstance, in your specific career. And so, it’s starting with these questions, like, “What’s being neglected that you care about? What is a new result that you want to create in your life or in your work or business?”

And my favorite is just asking, “What do you want more of on the day-to-day? And what do you want less of?” And I think we don’t slow down enough to really ask ourselves those questions because, frankly, we’re so busy and we’re so oversaturated.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Thank you. I love those questions. Now in your book, Lifestyled, you mentioned three tools. Could we hear about adjusting volume, creating systems, implementing habits, and maybe your top tip, your top do and don’t within each?

Shira Gill
Absolutely, yeah. So, I have these three universal organizing tools, and they came from over a decade of organizing people’s homes. And then in my second book, I actually traveled the world to interview the 25 most organized people I could find. And in interviewing the most organized people in the world, and this is like from Canada to Mexico City, to Paris, to Lisbon, to Stockholm, I found that all of these people were practicing these three universal tools.

And so, here’s what they are. So, number one is adjusting volume. I think this is the most critical tool. And the way I define it is, volume is the quantity or the capacity of something. And so, if you think about, like, a radio dial, like we get to turn it up or turn it down. In most cases, we need to turn down the volume of our lives. We have too much going on. We have too many things to deal with and to go through.

So, an example here would be looking at just like one small thing where you can adjust volume. So, maybe it’s like the subscriptions. Like, I just found out I had been paying for an app for three years that I didn’t even know what this app was. I mean, how embarrassing is that?

And, like, if you add up the amount of money that most of us are paying for, like, memberships or subscriptions or apps, that we don’t even realize we have or we’re certainly not using enough, that’s like a teeny micro example of how you can turn the volume down on something, and you can save money instantly.

I also think about volume in terms of, like, what we’re consuming from social media to the news. Like, how can you streamline your sources and be more intentional about curation? And another example with volume, I could go on and on about volume, so I’ll move on to the second. But it’s thinking about your wardrobe, right? So, there’s a statistic that most of us wear 20% of our wardrobes 80% of the time.

And if I think about it, even as a minimalist, I’m probably reaching for the same, like, five things again and again and again. So, thinking about, “How do I have less but better in my wardrobe?” We all know about, like, Obama and Steve Jobs and these powerful leaders who have, like, one uniform that they wear every day so that they can optimize having more time for other decisions.

So, it’s really just thinking about in all areas of your life, even things like friendship or relationships, how can you turn the volume down so that you’re investing in the things that matter the most that you value?

Okay, so tool two is creating systems. So, I think of a system as an organized framework. It’s like a strategy that solves a problem. So, an example would be my husband went out and he bought a camera. And this camera came with a lot of accoutrements. So, it was like all of these charging cords and batteries and the manual, and he was leaving these things all over our very small home which, of course, drove me crazy.

And what I realized is we brought this new thing into our home, but there’s no system to contain it. And so, I said to my husband, “If I got you, like, a basket or a bin, would you put all of your camera-related things into it so that it’s not all over our house?” He said, “Sure.” And that’s how simple a system can be. So, it’s looking at like, “What’s something that’s not working in my home or my workspace that feels scattered or disorganized? How can I systematize it in the most easy way imaginable?”

And then the final tool is implementing habits. And this one cannot be overlooked. I think, as an organizer, I’m mainly helping people reduce volume and then set up systems and then I leave. But then it’s up to my clients, right, to implement the routines and the practices that ensure that those systems are not rendered useless.

And what I realized in interviewing all of these organizers from all over the world is they all had the same complaint, they said, “Well, I’ll help people get rid of their clutter, and we’ll do these beautiful systems, and we’ll label them, and we’ll set everything up. And then I come back a month later and it is chaos. And, like, what’s not working?”

And so, the lightbulb that I had was you can have the most pristine, perfect system, but if you don’t follow a habit to maintain it, it’s rendered useless. And so, I write about a lot in the book, “How do we make habits easier?” because most of us know what we want to do, but there’s just so much friction in the way. So, it’s like, even for me, like I have a really hard time exercising.

So, I use that very simple hack that most people probably know about, which is the night before, I fill my water bottle, I put it by the front door with my shoes and everything I need, so I wake up and there’s a visual cue, like I’ve already taken care of business. Now I just have to go walk out the front door. So, those are the three tools in a nutshell: adjusting volume, creating systems, and implementing habits.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, that seems sensible. I’m intrigued, with adjusting the volume, most of us need less. What are the indications that we need more or less?

Shira Gill
So, I think that it’s asking yourself, “Do I feel like I have too many options? Do I feel overwhelmed?” Those are very clear cues. I would say the biggest word that I hear on repeat in my work is overwhelm. Almost everybody who works with me starts off by saying, “I just feel overwhelmed.” So, typically, that’s a sign that you have more volume than you can manage.

When we need to turn up the volume, it’s things like, “I feel lonely,” or, “I feel disconnected.” Like, there have been times in my life where I feel like I have more people and things and outings than I can manage.

And there have been other times in my life where I feel lonely or cut off or like, “Gosh, I’m not seeing the people that I love regularly.” Or, maybe I’ve moved to a new city, and I haven’t yet made new friends or connections, then it’s a matter of, “I need to turn the volume up on my effort towards connecting with people, reaching out, inviting people over.”

So, I think that’s a very real thing. Or, like, in your career, do you have more than you can successfully manage? Or, are you in a dry spell, where you feel like, “God, I don’t have as many clients as I want or as many projects as I want. Maybe I need to do more networking or connect with colleagues more”? So, I think those are some easy ways.

It’s like asking yourself those questions, “Do I have more than I can manage?” or, “Am I feeling some sort of a gap in my work or my relationships or even my home?” Sometimes a home, very rarely, but can get too minimal.

Pete Mockaitis
And I’d love to hear, when it comes to implementing the habits for non-cluttering of spaces or life, do you have a top habit or two that is truly transformational? And how do you recommend we get it started up?

Shira Gill
Yeah, so one of the biggest things that I see is paper clutter. And paper clutter is probably the most overwhelming and time-consuming thing to process because you can have like a small pile of papers, but that small pile represents maybe a hundred individual decisions to make. And so, what I find in most people’s homes and workspaces is their paper is strewn about in little micro piles everywhere, right?

So, typically, on the dining room table, on the kitchen counter, maybe in the entry, maybe on your nightstands in your bedroom. So, one of my easiest hacks that you can implement today is you can gather up all of the unprocessed paper piles that are in your environment, wherever they may be, and centralize them into one vessel. And the vessel is simply your action item basket.

So my rule is if anybody needs me to deal with any anything, look at anything, process anything, pay anything, it has to go in my action basket. So, now instead of having papers all over our home, I have one basket. I review it once a week. And so, it doesn’t feel like endless or daunting.

And, in the first place, like when you do this, it might feel like more of a mountain than a molehill. But what I can tell you, from years of feedback, is that just having all of those kind of nagging to do’s and open loops, open tabs in your brain in one place is really relieving for your brain. And then you can think of it as like, “This is one big project instead of a million overwhelming projects.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s an interesting organizational concept, in general, like the consolidation, one thing versus many things. And I’ve just been astounded, even in like a hotel. Like, I’ve got my bathroom stuff in a variety of places. There’s a little moisturizer, there’s a razor, there’s a toothbrush, there’s toothpaste. Okay, so those are kind of like all over, like, the sink area.

And then, when the housekeeper comes and does the tidying up, perhaps they place a washcloth next to the sink, and they place the items on the washcloth. And, somehow, to my eyes and brain and psyche, it’s like, “Ah, that’s much better.”

And nothing substantially has changed at all except, somehow, it seems, I am processing all of these toiletry items as one because they’ve been placed on a washcloth and it blows my mind that it’s like I’ve been tricked. It’s, like, “I fell for that. Like, this is making a huge difference to me.” What’s going on?

Shira Gill

I love it so much. Yeah, it’s the art of containment, right? So, instead of having all these random disparate things, we now have one thing, a pile of toiletries on a towel, contained and organized for your brain. So, it’s, again, like less for your brain to process.

And I think a big organizing hack that all of my colleague love, is just, like, make anything a system by batching it, containing it. Like, we love a tray, we love a basket. Like, it’s so, so simple, but even, like, thinking about for the people who make a smoothie every morning.

If you have a smoothie station that’s all corralled in a neat little pile on a tray, on your kitchen counter, suddenly, it feels organized and soothing to the brain, instead of having all of these different random things all over your kitchen.

And, I mean, I think, you’ve mentioned the hotel a couple of times, and I have to say people are always saying to me, like, “God, I just want my space to feel like how I feel at a hotel.” And I think the thing is, when we go to a hotel, there’s everything we need, but nothing more. They’ve cleared away all the excess.

And I think what people forget is that we have the ability to do that for ourselves in our own homes to clear away the excess, and to think about, you know, like my example in the home office, “What do I really need to do my job effectively? And what’s just collecting dust and creating mental clutter for me?”

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, now let’s hear about a favorite quote, something you find inspiring.

Shira Gill
Joshua Becker, who is a fellow minimalist and life simplifier, says, “The first step in crafting the life you want is to get rid of everything you don’t.”

Pete Mockaitis
So good, yes, Joshua was on the show.

Shira Gill
Oh, love that.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Shira Gill
Okay, so my new favorite book is called No New Things, not surprisingly. So, this is written by a colleague of mine, Ashlee Piper. She doesn’t think of herself as a minimalist, but she is a sustainability expert. And she has a 30-day “No New Things” challenge, where you just start thinking about, “What are the things that I want to bring into my life?” And she offers a bevy of tools to radically shift your relationship with consumption.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite habit?

Shira Gill

Oh, mine is really simple. It’s just a five-minute tidy before bed. I think setting yourself up for success in the morning should not be underestimated. So, for me, that’s, like, the quickest tidy with my family, wiping down the surfaces, making sure the dishes are done. If I have time, even laying out my outfit for the next day. It’s kind of like a gift to my future self.

Pete Mockaitis

And is there a Shira-original sound bite that really resonates with folks?

Shira Gill
I mean, I always say “Owning less is easier than organizing more.” And I think it’s, really, it’s a simple way of saying, like, “If you have less to organize, you can spend less time organizing.” It’s just kind of simple math.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Shira Gill
So, you can check out my website, which is just my name, ShiraGill.com. I have a free newsletter called “The Life Edit” on Substack. And you can find my three books anywhere books are sold, so Minimalista, Organized Living, and my new book is called Lifestyled.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for someone looking to be awesome at their job?

Shira Gill
Swap something you want to do less of with something you want to do more of. A simple example is most people tell me they want to spend less time scrolling social media and more time reading and absorbing new information that feels good. So, thinking about something you want to do less of and swapping it with something you want to do more of.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Shira, thank you.

Shira Gill
Thank you so much for having me.

1071: Boosting Productivity and Slashing Overwhelm through Timeboxing with Marc Zao-Sanders

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Marc Zao-Sanders reveals the key to breaking the cycle of overwhelm with a power tool that makes a huge difference.

You’ll Learn

  1. How to prune your to-do list effectively
  2. How to use timeboxing to plan your day with intention
  3. The art of choosing breaks

About Marc

Marc Zao-Sanders is the CEO and co-founder of filtered.com, a learning tech company. He regularly writes about algorithms, learning and productivity in Scientific American, Harvard Business Review and MIT Sloan Management Review. He has followed the practice of timeboxing for over ten years. He lives in London.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Plaud.AiUse the code AWESOME for a discount on your order
  • Rula. Connect with quality therapists and mental health experts who specialize in you at Rula.com/Awesome

Marc Zao-Sanders Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Marc, welcome!

Marc Zao-Sanders
Pete, it’s great to be here. Thanks for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, thank you. I’m excited to chat and let’s kick it off. I know you have studied productivity, done many experiments, worked it, iterated it. Could you share with us your most surprising discovery you’ve made about us humans and being productive so far?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Most surprising? I mean, maybe it’s just the simple fact that managing your time is so very important and yet it doesn’t get much attention from the public in general, from people at work. If you think about managing time, because time governs everything else, you can adopt a new habit and it might be really good for you. Let’s say it’s exercise or it’s breathing or it’s meditation or whatever, but if you can adopt an exercise, a practice, which is using a time better, then that’s all of the above and many thousands of other things.

So, I find it surprising that, although time management is a thing, if you ask people on the street, what are their systems for managing time, they haven’t thought about it all that much. And yet, that is the entirety of our existence, of our conscious experience of life.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah. Starting off light, our existence and conscious experience of life.

Marc Zao-Sanders
Straight into philosophy.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Well, yeah, I think that does ring true. We had Demir Bentley on the show who wrote a book called Winning the Week. And he said that this is, indeed, a theme he has observed amongst many of his high-performing clients, is that they all agree, “Oh, yes, planning the week is one of the most important things I could possibly do,” but they don’t do it. And so, almost universally, is the observation there.

So, share with us, what are we missing? Like, why aren’t we doing it? Are we just oblivious to the true benefit? Do we think it’s kind of a nice to have? We haven’t really seen the light, experienced it firsthand? Why are we dragging our feet here?

Marc Zao-Sanders
I think, probably, the main reason is just that life gets in the way. There are so many emails in your inbox, there are tasks to do in a task management system, or communications in Slack or Teams, or whatever it is, our mobile phones now as well. So, there are just so many reasons to not carve out some time for yourself and think about how to spend it well. We’re just hugely, hugely distracted.

So, I’d say that was a big thing with it. And I think, also, with any habit, you need to persevere with it a little bit to feel the benefits. And I think people need to get past that first day or two days to see the benefits of timeboxing or, indeed, another time management technique. Yeah, I think that’s it. And it’s a shame because I think we could, if we all lived more intentional lives, we would be happier. We would be more productive. We would get on better with each other. We’d be better human beings.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, could you maybe paint a picture for us in terms of an inspiring story of somebody who did just that? They weren’t bothering with the timeboxing approach, and then they adopted it, and what happened for them?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Well, one such person is me. It has worked for me as an individual. And that’s the key thing, I think, for anyone listening to this. You need to think, “Does it work for you as an individual?” There are studies, there’s all sorts of science that says that this works. But the key thing, really, is not whether it works for a bunch of other people, it’s whether it works for you.

So, I mean, my personal story is that I’m 45 years old, about to be 46. And when I started my career 20 something years ago, life was hard. I started in strategy consulting and the pressure was pretty intense.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I’ve been there.

Marc Zao-Sanders

I was suffering, frankly. I was a disorganized mess, yeah, the performance issues. I was, but more importantly, I wasn’t feeling very good about the work that I was doing. So, I established a little bit of control by setting up what I called a daily work plan. So, that was just an Excel file. I’d write in the Excel file. These are the things I really need to do today.

This is roughly how long they would take. And I’d check them off. They would sum up then to the productive hours that I’d had that day. That was good. That was much better. And it made me feel better about work, more confident with what I was doing. But it didn’t tell me, at any given moment, what I should be doing. It wasn’t linked to other meetings to my calendar.

So, then, yeah, I saw this article in Harvard Business Review. It’s called why “To-Do Lists Don’t Work.” And it immediately resonated. I changed what I was doing as an individual, overnight. And then, over the next five years, I sort of honed the technique. I made it my own. I wrote my own Harvard Business Review article that became very popular.

And that led to the book, and talking to many, many people over the years about timeboxing and how it can help not just with your, I mean, it’s really not just about your productivity. It’s really mostly about how you feel, the control that you feel as you go through the day, as you’re going through the maelstrom of a knowledge worker’s day. It can be unpleasant a lot of the time, but if you focus on one thing at a time and you’ve planned that out, it feels a lot better.

So, yeah, the case study I would give most of all, first and foremost, that I know and have lived is mine, but, obviously, I’ve heard that story, that kind of story from many, many people, from, I mean, literally, from around the world. That’s, I mean, just one other thing to say about that, that the book’s been, and I’m an unknown author.

I was an unknown author before I started this, and yet the rights were bought up in 33 languages because the story, because this idea of making your life more intentional through, basically, through your digital calendar resonated across cultures, across languages. And there’s also a bunch of case studies at the end of the book as well, stories from individuals that have made timeboxing work for them in their specific situations too.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, so that’s cool. Works for you, works for them. I actually am curious to hear about the studies. And, in fact, in your Harvard Business Review article, at the very top, it says a recent survey of 100 productivity hacks, timeboxing was ranked the number one most useful. Tell us a bit about that and any other, I guess, researcher evidence saying, “This isn’t just a cool thing Marc likes doing. It’s pretty proven for lots of folks.”

Marc Zao-Sanders
So, that study was done a long, long time ago. I did a lot of the research for it, but this is well before I’d written the book or even had an idea about writing the book. I had no, literally, no affiliation with timeboxing. I mean, I happen to do it myself, but actually a lot of the other techniques on the list, I also happen to do.

So, the way that we conducted that study was to look at lots and lots of thought leadership pieces online and categorized them according to which time management technique, which productivity hack or tip they were, and then just see how common they were. And that gave rise to an ordering, a top 100, and, yeah, like you say, timeboxing came top.

Pete Mockaitis

So, that came about by votes or by most frequently cited amongst industries?

Marc Zao-Sanders
No, exactly, most frequently cited, so how many times they were coming up. And it’s not only that. If you look at a lot of the other entries on that list, and like you say, it’s linked to in the in the book and probably on some articles on my site, you can see that many of the other techniques on the list are very, very similar to timeboxing or, actually, they form a subset of timeboxing.

I’ll give you an example. Just saying no, so just saying no is a thing in business. It’s been encouraged a lot over the last five, ten years. By the way, I think this is more of a nuanced thing. Sometimes people should say yes more than they do. It depends on the person and the context. But sometimes they should say no.

Well, saying no is partly dependent on how busy you are and what you’ve got on. If you timebox, you’re not just saying no or just saying yes, you’re doing so on the basis of what you’ve got on your plate. It’s something that you can point to, point your boss to, or point colleagues to. So, just saying no is, it goes very, very nicely hand in hand with timeboxing, just like so many of the other items on the list.

I’ll give you just one other example as well. “Eat That Frog,” the Brian Tracy idea of, you know, do the most difficult thing at the start of the day. Well, again, it’s not like timeboxing is saying you should do the most difficult thing, but if it suits you as a person, then here’s a system where you can put the most difficult thing at the start of the day, again, just completely, consistently, and to support that system that Brian Tracy came up with or popularized.

But also, if you’re the opposite, if you’re someone who needs to slowly, slowly build momentum through the day and start with some smaller tasks, which suits certain people better than it does the Brian Tracy method, that’s also consistent with timeboxing because here’s a system where you can build up slowly with some easier, smaller tasks at the start.

So, my point is that, yeah, timeboxing is very flexible with, it was number one itself, but it’s also works, so nicely with virtually every other time management technique.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, so then we say there were timeboxing a lot. Can you lay it on us? What exactly are we talking about here?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Well, I’ve got a definition, but maybe it’s better to describe it in terms of what I do at the start of the day. I’ll come back to a definition after that. So, I wake up, I get dressed, I brush my teeth. And then the very first thing that I do is spend 15 minutes thinking about my day and how I should spend my time. So, those 15 minutes are definitely the most productive of my entire day.

I couldn’t really, now, I can’t really imagine not using them like that. I don’t need more than 15 minutes. I do normally need 15 minutes because sometimes your emails have come in overnight, an idea has occurred to you overnight, and you need to take that into account along with other entries in your calendar. So, it’s a little bit of work, but just 15 minutes.

And then those 15 minutes lead you to have a day where it’s full of what you really wanted to do, what really mattered, what you intended to do. This is what I mean by intentions, giving yourself the space to become aware of what your intentions are, what’s important to you, and then having a system for making sure that they happen. So, that’s what it is, you know, that’s sort of my experience of it. I do that each and every day. I do it in the morning. Some people do it the night before.

But in terms of a definition, which, it’s probably slightly less useful, but I’ll give one anyway. So, I described in terms of what, when, one, enough. What I mean by what is deciding, giving yourself the space to think through what is most important. And then when is deciding when it should start and when it should finish, not being too ambitious, but being ambitious enough with those timings.

One means doing, is single tasking. Just do that one thing in that slot, nothing else. And then enough is doing it to a good-enough level. You’re not aiming for perfection here. Perfection doesn’t really exist for any of us. Do it so that it’s good enough that you can share with others and move things on in your workflow or in your life, whatever the context happens to be. So, yeah, that’s kind of how, that’s the lived experience of it as well as the definition.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, that seems pretty simple, and yet, in your experience and that of luminaries throughout history – Carl Jung, Albert Einstein, Bill Gates, etc., – it’s revolutionary, you say.

Marc Zao-Sanders
It’s revolutionary in that anyone who wants to achieve a lot and feel good about doing that needs to really use their time well. And I think there’s just something very fundamental about timeboxing. It is working out what’s important, setting a time to do it, not being distracted by anything else, and doing it to a good-enough level.

I mean, it’s very hard, I think, to launch an argument against that. I’m going to invite you to do that, Pete. And, actually, I wanted to ask you if you timebox.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, challenge accepted.

Marc Zao-Sanders

Okay, so go ahead. I mean, which of those elements, which of those four elements of the definition would you say, “Eh, that’s actually not that important”?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, no. I suppose, I don’t think that it’s not important. I just think we can come up with lots of excuses for why, “Oh, that’s a nice view, Mark, but I don’t think that’ll quite work for me,” or, “Yeah, that sounds cool, but…” so I think there’s a lot of buts that it might be worth our time digging into to a few of those.

Marc Zao-Sanders

Of course. I mean, some people will see that and then not act on it. I mean, of course that happens. It does require a little bit of discipline, and anything that requires even a modicum of discipline can be ignored, and some people will take the path of lesser immediate term resistance.

Pete Mockaitis
“No, Marc, instead, I’m just going to get this cool app. That’s going to fix my time management problems. This fun little app instead.”

Marc Zao-Sanders
So, yeah, I mean, there are some apps that will do some of this for me and for a lot of people. It’s connecting with your intentions and making sure that you’re doing the things that you want to do at the right time, requires a little bit more of yourself. So, yeah, sure, you can have AI just arrange things for you, but then are you going to be happy with the order of them?

And even in the processing of you’re putting these tasks into your calendar, your brain starts to think about, you know, starts to problem-solve. So, you’re making a little bit of progress with each of them, even in the act of doing it. So, yeah, there are apps and there’s AI, and that’s fine for some people. It’s not for me. It’s not the method that I advocate.

I’m a little bit more old school. So, while I advocate having a digital calendar and making that sync with your various devices, rather than a sort of paper-based system, AI is not something that you need for timeboxing. Not in my view.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, yeah, certainly. Well, so then I suppose, with regard to discipline, for folks who think, “Oh, that sounds cool, Marc, but I just couldn’t even do that because I’m a creative, flexible, fluid kind of a personality. I don’t really do well when I’m tied down,” what do you think of that?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Okay, so I hear this, obviously, sometimes, “They just wouldn’t work for me. Well, it wouldn’t work for me.” Okay, so, I mean, a few things to say. But the first one that occurs to me is like, even if you’re a creative, you’re already timeboxing to some extent because you’ve got meetings in your calendar, right? That’s unavoidable. And however creative or uncreative those meetings are, you’ve got those meetings.

And you have to have some sort of timekeeping system to make sure that you attend those meetings more or less on time. I mean, even if you’re five, 10 minutes late for most of your meetings, as some creatives might be, the meeting is there and it is important and you’re probably annoying some people by being a little bit late.

So, it’s not like this is a brand-new system that I’m suggesting you sort of foist-force into your life. We’re all creative or non-creatives, and also, we’re all creative in some respect. But all of us are using our calendar to spend time specifically, at the very least, with meetings. What I’m saying with timeboxing is let’s extend that a little bit further so that we also do it with some of the work that we do on our own so that we can achieve more and actually, with creativity, specifically, achieve more creatively.

You’re much more likely to achieve the state of flow and get to what Cal Newport and others call deep work, scale the heights of our capability if you remove all of your distractions, if you get to a period of time where you’re just working on one thing. So, I would say that it actually, I mean, genuinely, I think that it supports creativity. It doesn’t stifle it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And then when it comes to discipline, if folks think, “Boy, Marc, I just don’t think I have that level of discipline. That sounds really hardcore. That sounds Navy SEAL-esque to go from thing to next thing, to next thing, to next thing with perfect rigid execution. That sounds beyond my meager willpower capabilities”?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Okay. If someone said that, if you said that, for example, I would say, I mean, first of all, it doesn’t need to be perfect. It doesn’t need to be rigid. It also doesn’t need to be productive thing to productive thing. One of the productive things might well be having a break, might be lying down, might be having a cold shower, might be taking your dog for a walk. It’s just positive, intentional activities that you know, by the end of the day and even actually during the day, are going to be really, really good for you.

The other thing I’d say to such a person or, you, potentially, Pete, is, well, like I said, you’re already doing it to some extent. And then also, well, why don’t you just try it? For tomorrow, you could put into your calendar right now, I mean, actually, if you’re listening to this, or watching this right now, anything you could do to get started is put a 15-minute time box, just an event, into your calendar for tomorrow morning at a time that suits you.

I mean, obviously, you need to be awake. You need to be awake enough to get it done. And in those 15 minutes, plan out some of the rest of your day. I will plan out a lot of the rest of my day because I’ve been doing it for 20 years now. But do it for a couple of hours or three hours or four hours.

And once you’ve tried that for a few days, and I imagine you will achieve some success and you’ll get into a snowball effect, a virtuous circle, you’ll be doing it some more. And if it really doesn’t work for you, well, then stop, but give it a try.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, well said. So, we don’t need to start with the entirety of the day that, indeed, could feel intimidating. Understood.

Marc Zao-Sanders

Yeah, don’t let perfection or completion be the enemy of the good here. Get something done. And I’m a big believer in 80-20 and pretty good and doing a decent job of things rather than sort of Navy SEALs perfection, anything like that. I don’t come from that background. I don’t have that in my locker. I’m just a regular guy.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, so let’s talk about, it sounds like the hardest part of all is we’ve got dozens, hundreds of options, things that have landed in our to-do list with varying levels of seriousness, urgency, importance. How do you begin to decide, “Ah, yes, this is, in fact, the thing that goes on today’s calendar”?

Marc Zao-Sanders

Okay. So, first of all, what you’ve just described is exactly the reason that timeboxing is important. Most of us knowledge workers, at any given moment, could be working on 20, 30, 40, maybe 100 things. They would all be somewhat legitimate. And the existence of so many different things that we could do is stressful in itself. So, you’re doing one thing, and two or three or five or 20 of the other things occur to you. That is so stressful. And that stresses me out every single day.

So, that’s the reason that, the main reason I would say, that timeboxing is important, it kind of pushes all of those other things away and focuses you on a single thing. So, that’s why it’s important. If you have 100 items, though, and how are you going to decide, I’ve got a trick which is very concrete, very tangible, very easy.

So, let’s say you’ve got a to-do list, Pete. You’ve got 100 items on it and you don’t know where to start. Some of those things are going to be very important. Some of them less so. It’s probably accumulated over weeks, months, maybe even years. I would say grab it, put it into a spreadsheet, go down the list, and just score them very roughly on a of an approximation of both urgency and importance. Just sort of, you know, merge the two together, give them a score between zero and 10 every single one.

Now, look, even if you’ve got 100, it’s going to take a little while to do it, but it’s not going to take you more than 10 minutes. This is not a huge, huge task. So, you score them all, zero to 10, and then you sort it on the score that you’ve given it. So, most the highest numbers will go to the top. And then as soon as you’ve done that sort, you will see immediately there’s a group of tasks at the bottom that you really could just delete.

And that is hugely reassuring, gratifying. It’s such a relief to see the list look like that. And then there are tasks at the top that really will be super important because you’ve given them an eight or a nine or a 10. You might want to do some further ordering of those. And that’s also a huge relief because those big important items that you knew were lurking in your to-do list are being surfaced properly. So, they will get your attention.

So those, you know, three, four, five, 10, whatever it is, items that you really had to do are going to make their way into your calendar and get done. And that is so, I mean, it really is about control, like taking control of your life by having a system to understand what is most important, and get it done. This is a specific tactic for dealing with a long to-do list.

And then you can do that even every so often when you’ve only got 20 items, it also works. It sounds, I don’t know, maybe for some people it sounds a little bit much to put into a spreadsheet, but much better that than just leaving it there to gather dust and bother you every so often.

And, occasionally, you’re going to be getting fines because you haven’t dealt with some tax issue or responded to some letter. So, I mean, it’s literally costly, financially costly, to not address it and not address it in some kind of systemic positive, repeatable way.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah. Well, I love that so much. And you mentioned 80-20 and so much of what you said there, I’m vibing with a ton. And the phrase “somewhat legitimate,” I think is, oh, so perfect for the items that hang out in our to do this.

Marc Zao-Sanders
At the top that we’ve got.

Pete Mockaitis
They are somewhat legitimate and, yet, Vilfredo Pareto would say they are not the vital few of the 80-20 rule.

Marc Zao-Sanders
Yeah, find the vital few. Find the vital few and do those.

Pete Mockaitis
And it is such relief, you’re right, to see a huge list and to see many of them drop off. It’s like the fastest way to get something off of your to-do list is to decide thoughtfully, thoroughly, not to do it, “Hey, that’s off my to-do list and legitimately so.”

Marc Zao-Sanders
Exactly. Yes, it’s basically pruning. And there is no more efficient way of pruning a list than via a spreadsheet. So, the spreadsheet is not officially part of timeboxing. It is a very effective method for, yeah, for getting to the vital few, as you put it.

Pete Mockaitis
So, I would like to hear a little bit about some of those questions by which we might use to determine what is calendar-worthy. And so, vital few, 80-20 type things suggest that vital few activities produce 16 times the output per unit input than trivial many items. So, there’s that. I also love the ONE Thing question. We had Jay Papasan on the show earlier.

What’s the one thing such that, by doing it, everything else will become easier or unnecessary? So, that’s a huge win in terms of a prioritizer. We had Greg McKeown talking essentialism, in terms of like raising your standard, like cleaning out your closet, not from, “Might this someday be useful?” “No, no, low standard,” to, “Does this spark joy?” Marie Kondo style, high standard.

So, any other sort of uber powerful questions that are super handy in the universe of prioritizing?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Yeah, well, the main one for me is actually the emotional response you have to a specific item. So, as you’re going through the list, you will feel stressed or you have some sort of emotional response to some, and to some you just will have the absolute opposite.

What I’m suggesting is that, where you have a stronger emotional response, in general, you’re going to want to action those. So, I think that’s a proxy for importance for what matters to you that comes from your soul, actually. You don’t really need to ask any other questions. It’s just what is your response to this particular item.

Pete Mockaitis
And when you say strong emotional response, is it either positive or negative? Is a go signal for action?

Marc Zao-Sanders
No, definitely. It might well be negative. I mean, look, for example, let’s say a tax return. A tax return, for most people, is not going to be hugely positive, but that doesn’t mean that you leave that and let’s find the good stuff. No. What I’m saying is that any kind of strong response probably means that either, you know, because you really want to want to do it because you’re enthusiastic about it.

In general, we don’t need help with those sorts of tasks. So, it’s actually more the ones where you have some sort of negative response. And to just dwell on that particular example, because that’s something that a lot of people feel when it comes to that time of year, getting something like a tax return back to whoever needs to see it.

The problem with not addressing it is that you just die a thousand deaths instead. You will need to do it in the end, and maybe you incur a fee as well if you go beyond whatever the deadline is. But even if you hit the deadline, if you worry about it 17 times before you submit it, well, why have you done that? Much better to confront it, be front-footed, and get the thing done on your terms proactively.

I use the term. I use the word agency a lot with timeboxing. It’s taking back your agency. You be in control. Don’t let the world happen to you. You decide what needs to happen and when it’s going to happen and get it done.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, ooh, die a thousand deaths, or sigh a thousand “Ugh.” Like, “Ugh, maybe tomorrow.”

Marc Zao-Sanders
Or, timebox instead.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Okay. Well, so we got some thoughts on how to choose what goes in on this day’s calendar. Do you have some pro tips on how do I think about how long should that thing take? How long should I work in a bout of work, rest, breaks? What are some of the pro tips to designing a day to be a masterpiece?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Okay. Well, exactly, it is like that. It’s sort of like you’re an architect, you’re designing, you’re like an alchemist of the experience that you’re going to have that day, and the ordering matters. I mean, if you think, let’s say you’ve got to write, I don’t know, a summary of a podcast, right? That’s one of your tasks. And you also want to go to the gym.

Now for some people, it will make a lot of sense to go to the gym first and then do the write-up. And for others, it will be the other way around. It really depends on how your brain works, how your mood is, what energy you have, maybe some of the logistical, the contextual elements of your day, but, really, the order really matters.

So, yeah, build in breaks. Consider that the order matters. I mean, for me, for example, when I’ve got difficult things to think about, I like to have some exercise built in to give me a chance to think about them in a diffusive way. So, I can just be a little bit more relaxed and have sort of answers come to me while I’m doing some hard or semi-hard exercise.

So, yeah, build in some breaks, build in also some slack. If you don’t have any slack and you go, like you were saying earlier, Pete, from thing to thing to thing, if anything breaks or anything takes a tiny bit longer, and you haven’t responded to it, then you can have a cascading, a negative cascading effect. So, build in some slack, build in some breaks.

I mean, to be a little bit more specific, okay, it varies from person to person, but for me, every couple of hours, I will need 10, 15 minutes, normally 15 minutes of a break. And that could be anything. Just get a drink, take the dog for a walk, have a shower, meditate, close my eyes. There are a lot of ways of having a break that aren’t just to default to the canteen or the kitchen and eat something that’s not that healthy for you.

So, with breaks, there’s a bit of an art to it as well. And think a little bit more about what’s going to refresh you and give you energy. But I would say that there’s no hard and fast rules about how much time or how many breaks you should take. It’s really, just coming back to that word intention, what works for you. Think hard about what works for you.

You can take as a guideline, you know, how I spend my day. And in the book, I’ve got some screenshots of how that is, but that won’t necessarily be that way, done that way, it won’t be for everyone. The point is to have a system, like timeboxing, which is super flexible and can accommodate different attitudes to different needs for taking breaks and having slack and what you do in those times.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, very good. And then when we’re actually doing the calendaring, do you have any pro tips in terms of 15-minute increments, or color coding, or anything that makes this go better?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Both of those, for sure. So, I mean, 15 minutes, so I have three sizes of timebox. And, again, other people can take a different view, and it is flexible to having different denominations. But my denominations are 15 minutes, 30 and 60. It’s nice and easy, there’s only three sizes so I don’t have to spend long thinking, “Is this a 48-minute task or a 17-minute task or whatever?” It’s just, like, a small, medium, large. And I know what small, medium, large are.

They also stack nicely up to an hour. There’s obviously 15s, you know, go into 60, so does 30. And then you asked about color coding. Well, I do color code my calendar, and this is to get a handle on, I mean, quite literally, get a view, a literal view of the balance of my life. So, I have five different areas of my life at the moment. So, there’s one business that I advise, another business that I advise, things that are for me to do with my soul and my wellbeing. And then there’s speculative activities as well.

So, I’ve got a few different categories of my life that I’ve deemed to be important for me right now. Okay, so if I color code the items as they go into the calendar, I can see at a glance at the end of a week, how much time I’ve spent on each of these areas. And, actually, the way that both Google and Microsoft do calendars now, they’ll toss it up for you.

So, they’re telling you, “Well, you’re spending 30% of your time on your…” as I put it, “…soul. Well, is that good or not good?” But if you have the data, then you can make a decision about adjusting it up or down. So, color coding sounds a little bit trivial, I mean, almost absurd, but there’s actually a very good reason for doing it.

I also, Pete, use emojis in my timeboxes. Why do I do that? I mean, probably not for a very good reason. It just gives me, I see timeboxing as sending your future self a message, a little bit of guidance, so that when that future self is distracted and stressed by the inevitable difficulties of a working day, you have that line back to, when you were in a calmer moment, when you were a bit wiser, when things were more still, “Oh, yeah, that’s the thing that I should do.”

How’s that relevant to emojis? Well, it’s a little bit tongue in cheek. It’s a little bit, like, I don’t know, like a wink or a hug. It’s an affectionate message from my former less-stressed self to my later more-stressed self. And so, I put them in. That it definitely is an optional feature of timeboxing.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s fun. And what’s cool about emojis is they can be right in the line of the text as opposed to a separate image thing, which is all weird and complicated and hard to shove into a calendar software.

Marc Zao-Sanders

Yeah, definitely. And it is for me. It’s right before the text that I put it. Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m also a fan of the Unicode symbol for a checkbox in the calendar. That feels nice. I just have that copy-pasted like, “Oh, and then that happened. Mission accomplished,” because that’s one of the most satisfying things about a to-do list is the checking them off. I can still have that in my calendar too.

Marc Zao-Sanders

Yeah, exactly. So, it sounds, Pete, like you timebox and you are using some of the higher arts of timeboxing, as we speak, as you live.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, yes, higher arts. Well, Marc, tell me, any final things you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Marc Zao-Sanders
Sure. I mean, well, okay, a couple of things that occurred to me. One is just the word time itself. So, this is a not very well-known fact, but time is the most commonly used noun in the whole of the English language, but not just the English language. If you look at Spanish, if you look at German, if you look at Chinese, I think, as well, and many others.

So, it’s super, super common. And it’s not like I was saying at the top, at the start of our conversation. It is surprising that people don’t give it even more time and attention than they do. So, that is just a factor I’ll sort of park with people. The other one I want to say is there’s a, yeah, sometimes you’ve got a plan with someone, like a dinner, and then the dinner gets cancelled.

And there’s nothing nicer than that feeling when you suddenly have some time in your calendar, but it’s very easy to waste, especially with your social media and our phones and what have you. There’s a mnemonic which has really gone down. Well, actually since the book came out. This isn’t even in the book, but it’s Mr. Elf.

So, the M is for meditation, R is for reading, E for exercise, L for learning, F for friends and family. This isn’t an exhaustive list, but it’s a very, very useful list to just run through. If I’ve got a bit of time and I want to use it well, here’s a reminder of some of the things that are probably going to be important, could well be important to me. And why not do that with your time rather than Netflix or Instagram or Snap or whatever it is? So, yeah, I want to get Mr. Elf into the ears of the people that are listening and watching.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, beautiful. Thank you. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Marc Zao-Sanders
There’s one from Lady Gaga that I really like and speaks to, I think, what’s the most important about, one of the most important things about life and about this system.

So, the quote is, “I am my own sanctuary and can be reborn as many times as I choose throughout my life.” To me, it’s about agency and hope and truth. And while it’s nice to be quoting Plato and Socrates and Nietzsche in the book, too, it’s also nice to give Lady Gaga some extra attention, too.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite study or experiment or piece of research?

Marc Zao-Sanders

There was a study into what’s called implementation intentions. If you just Google implementation intentions, you’ll see. What these basically said was that if you decide when you’re going to do something, what you’re going to do, and when you do it, you’re two and half times more likely to get something done. You’re something like 90% likely to get it done versus 30-something percent.

It’s been replicated more recently in studies. And, of course, that kind of encapsulates exactly what I’m trying to get at with timeboxing. And, actually, when you were asking me earlier, “Well, what about the people that are just aren’t going to do it?” Well, the studies say that you really are two and a half times more likely. So, I probably should have said that back then. It basically says that timeboxing works.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite book?

Marc Zao-Sanders
I mean, the book I’ve read the most frequently is Lord of the Rings because it’s just enjoyable. A book that moved me more recently was The Fountainhead, Ayn Rand. I enjoyed that very much. That felt a lot about freedom and, again, agency. So, that resonated and was enjoyable as well, and it’s quite a different style to Tolkien’s work.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool?

Marc Zao-Sanders

Well, I mean, in making decisions in business, or in life, actually, the two-by-two matrix is one that I default to pretty frequently. You’ve got an issue, you don’t know how you’re going to resolve it, think about two of the factors involved that are distinct, and then you look at high, low, or yes, no for each of them. You put that onto a two-by-two and, just almost immediately, almost every time, things clarify somewhat. So, yeah, the two-by-two matrix is a really useful one for me. I love the thing.

Pete Mockaitis

And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to resonate with folks, a Marc-original soundbite?

Marc Zao-Sanders
So, this is about, timeboxing is mostly an in-day activity to help you make the most of that day. But the point is if you keep doing it, that adds up to a whole life of intention and purpose and meaning and what have you.

So, the quote is, “The practice of daily intentional activity will eventually yield what almost every human being wants most – a chosen cherished life.” I think that’s very nice and just touches on, like I said, meaning, something that’s sort of deep. Deep and important.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Marc Zao-Sanders
I’m on LinkedIn. You can just put my name in. I accept requests, generally, there. I also have a website, MarcZaoSanders.com, from which there’s a monthly newsletter, and you can email me and get in touch by just answering, that it’s a Substack.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for someone looking to be awesome at their job?

Marc Zao-Sanders

Yeah, don’t just let life and your job just happen to you. Rediscover what you want to do, what your intentions are, and find a way to bring them into being, into your work, into your life.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Marc, thank you.

Marc Zao-Sanders
Pete, thank you.

1070: An ADHD Strategist’s Pro Tips for Staying Motivated and Productive When You Can’t Focus with Skye Waterson

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Skye Waterson shares ADHD-friendly approaches to productivity that any professional can apply.

You’ll Learn

  1. The quickest way to shorten your to-do list
  2. How to stop overthinking and make a decision
  3. How to make hard tasks more fun

About Skye

Skye Waterson is an ADHD strategist, coach, and founder of Unconventional Organisation, helping entrepreneurs and executives stay focused, build consistent revenue, and scale—without burnout. With 82K+ engaged professionals following her work, she shares ADHD-friendly strategies for sustainable success.

After her ADHD diagnosis during her PhD, she realized traditional productivity advicedidn’t work for her. So, she developed strategies to help entrepreneurs and executives cut through distractions and focus on what matters, build ADHD-friendly systems for consistency, scale sustainably without exhaustion, and lead with confidence and regain control over their time.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Plaud.AiUse the code AWESOME for a discount on your order

Skye Waterson Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Skye, welcome!

Skye Waterson
Hi, it’s great to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m so excited to hear your wisdom. You are an ADHD strategist and coach. That sounds handy. We’ve had over a thousand episodes, but we have not taken a laser shot directly at ADHD before, though it kind of comes up tangentially fairly often. So, could you, first of all, maybe just define, what are we talking about here? What precisely is ADHD? Is it the same thing as ADD? How do I think about this?

Skye Waterson
It’s a good question and it has been changing. So, ADHD is something that, if you wanted to get diagnosed with, you would go to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of disorders. Or, more likely, you’d want a psychiatrist to do it for you. And you could be diagnosed in this version, because it has been different in the past, with ADHD, type one, type two, primarily, and type three.

So, it’s primarily inattentive, which is what we used to know of as ADD; primarily hyperactive, which is the ADHD; or combined type, which is what I have. And what we know from this is that, basically, you are somebody who hits a certain criteria, of feeling driven by a motor, struggling to sit down, getting distracted, like all these kinds of things. And it also happens persistently and pervasively, so across different categories of your life and across time as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, so three flavors: inattentive, hyperactive, and combined. And can we hear a little bit of detail for, what does each mean? And how do I distinguish that from just, you know, being a human who has moods and distract-ability and all that?

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Well, you know, and there’s more and more conversation about this idea of subclinical ADHD because I think it’s something that everybody does struggle with. And I will say, about 50% of my clients are undiagnosed. So, they haven’t had the official diagnosis yet. They just think that they might have ADHD.

And so, when we’re talking about this, what, really, we’re talking about is you might be somebody who goes, “Oh, yeah, I get it. On a Friday afternoon, I’m exhausted and very distractible.” But we’re saying, “But what about on a Monday morning? What about on the weekend? What about at home? What about at school? What about at work?” Like, this variety of different environments is the situation that we’re looking at.

And, “Was it happening when you were a child? Is it happening now?” You know, that’s kind of what people will be looking at. And then hyperactive is very much the classic ADHD. If you guys know a person who’s like running three different businesses, two of them on some kind of really strange thing you’ve never heard before, and like always go, go, go, that kind of ADHD.

And then ADD is more of the distractible. So, person who’s looking out the window, distracted, that kind of ADHD. That’s a very generalized version of it. There’s lots of different kinds, but that’s essentially the tropes that people think about.

Pete Mockaitis
And so, then what’s this combined business? Like, someone is go, go, go and inattentive at the same time or, like, back and forth? How does that unfold?

Skye Waterson
Pretty much, yeah. So, somebody who gets distracted and is hyperactive.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Now I’d also heard that hyper-focusing can be a part of ADD or ADHD as well, which was a head-scratcher for me. It’s like that kind of sounds like the opposite. What’s going on here?

Skye Waterson
So, what’s happening there is you’ve got something called time blindness. So, people with ADHD, and when I first found out I had it, this was a surprise for me, really struggled with time blindness, seeing how much time is passing. And so, if you’re bored, it feels like, you know, two minutes is like a year.

But if you get into flow, if you’re really focusing, you can actually lose track of time and you can just be fully engaged and fully focused on the task at hand. That hyper focus is specific to ADHD because it’s not that we are necessarily just distractible. It’s more like a wandering attention. So, if your attention gets fixed on something, then we can really dive into it. Sometimes it’s good. Sometimes it’s not good.

Pete Mockaitis
I guess good or not good is based upon what needs doing and what you find yourself hyper-focused upon.

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Did you want to be hyper-focusing on that thing? Sometimes people are like, “I did not have any intention to hyper-focus today, and now I am knee-deep in my closet reorganizing it for the second straight hour. That was not the plan.” So that would be the case.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Okay. So, I guess the way we know if we got it or not is we chat with a psychiatrist who does the DSM. That sounds maybe expensive and intense. Is there a quicker, easier way we can get a pretty good idea, Skye?

Skye Waterson
Well, there are online versions. You can even search the DSM. I think it’s available. But there are online tests that you can take. Some of them, you know, in the NHS and places like that will do a better job of kind of approximating what you would be asked by a psychiatrist. Obviously, if you don’t go to a psychiatrist, they can’t help you rule out whether you have other conditions that might be co-occurring, which happens a lot with ADHD.

But, yeah, it does take a while. It could take a really long time if you try and go public. And if you try and go private, then it’s very expensive. So, for that reason, a lot of people decide to just live with the, you know, they go, “Okay, I’m pretty confident I have it and I need strategies for it,” and they come to me and that’s what I help with.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And what’s our best guess for the very rough proportion of professionals, diagnosed or not, who likely have it?

Skye Waterson
It’s about 2.5% of the population of adults. That’s usually the stats.

Pete Mockaitis
Noted. And I’m curious, in terms of, for the 97.5% of listeners who do not have it, are there any particular strategies that work awesomely for people with ADD, ADHD, as well as the rest of folk?

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Well, that’s the greatest thing. I mean, I’ve had the opportunity to work with the New Zealand government on some of their organizations, and I often will teach these strategies, and people will say, “Wait, wouldn’t this be great if everybody was doing it?” And I’m like, “Yes, these are wonderful strategies for anybody who’s struggling with executive functioning or distraction,” which is all of us at some of the time.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Understood. And maybe, just to get the motivations fired up, can you share any transformational tales or research results on just what kind of impact can adopting some of these strategies have?

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Well, there’s a lot of research. One of the things that we do know about ADHD is it’s one of the most treatable conditions. So, it’s very, very treatable. Once you have strategies for it, it’s very helpful. A lot of the problems people have is just that they’ve been taught the wrong systems, and they don’t have a sense of how their brain actually works because no one’s taught them, and so they have no idea.

Pete Mockaitis

So, when you say wrong systems, can you give us some examples of common prescriptions that just aren’t cutting it?

Skye Waterson
So, I would say the biggest thing is that people will be given strategies based on this idea that we have executive functioning when we don’t. So, with ADHD, the biggest struggles we have are working memory, forgetting everything, everything that we’ve recently been told. Time blindness, so not being able to track, estimate, measure time effectively.

Dopamine, so having a struggle with not getting enough of it, not having it processed correctly. And transition time, so not being able to transition between task to task effectively, needing a bit more downtime, needing to chunk things out. Those are really, really important. If somebody says to you, for example, “You should just get started. You’ll feel better,” or, “Why don’t you give yourself a reward once you finish this? That’ll be great.”

Those are the pieces or, “Why don’t you do this just with an hour a day between your meetings?” This is terrible advice for ADHD.

Pete Mockaitis
Right. And I guess I’m saying get the reward was like, “Hey, I got a dopamine situation so maybe that’s not going to cut the mustard there.”

Skye Waterson
Research does not back you up on that one.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, say again?

Skye Waterson

So, there’s research into this, it’s something that I’m very passionate about. It’s called the dopamine transfer deficit theory. So, it came out in 2008, one of my favorite pieces of research, because that’s who I am. And, basically, what it shows is that there seems to be a gap in the type of dopamine boost that you get when you’re ADHD at the beginning of a task.

If you’re neurotypical, you know there’s a reward at the end of the task. Your brain gives you a little thumbs up, a little “Woohoo!” at the beginning because you know that you’re going to get that reward at the end. If you’re ADHD, your brain just kind of goes, “This is lame. Why are we doing this?” And then you do it. And then at the end, you give yourself a reward and your brain goes, “Well, this is nice, but why did we have to do that horrible thing?” The connection is not there.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, that’s intriguing. And so, that has been shown. When we say neurotypical as opposed to ADD, ADHD, how, and this is based upon they have the diagnosis, or do we have any brain scans, or biomarkers, or I guess we know it because we got the symptoms and the DSM diagnosis? Are there other indicators at the biochemical or level of matter that we can point to?

Skye Waterson
You’re speaking my language. I love a neuroscience paper. So, in terms of, generally overall, you are asking me about, “Do we actually see neurobiological shifts in people who have ADHD and people who don’t?” The answer is yes. There is a lot of neuroscience research. In fact, not just neuroscience.

AI as well, they’ve been looking at AI research and finding that the way people speak with ADHD is a bit different, tend to like jump from point to point, and more likely to interrupt. And so, there is new research coming out that you could actually potentially get to a place where you can tell if someone has ADHD or not, at least at a subclinical screening level using AI.

So, there are lots of different ways, neuroscience and neurobiology are one of them, but it does take a long time because you have to sit in the chair and there’s not that many of them.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Understood. So, then help us out, if we do have ADD or are just having a heck of a time focusing, what are your favorite strategies?

Skye Waterson
My first favorite strategy is what I call a two-minute focus formula, because there’s only two minutes. So, I want to give you guys that upfront. You guys can actually DM me at Unconventional Organisation on Instagram. If you want this, just use the word awesome, and I will give it to you because that way I’ll know it came from here.

And, basically, the first thing you need to do is you need to go ahead and you need to write down somewhere you’re going to keep it, not on a random piece of paper. We want it to be something we’ll come back to. You start by writing down everything that you are going to be doing, every single task basically that’s in your head. Don’t look at your email. Don’t look at your other tasks. Let’s just focus on what’s in your head.

And, usually, this is the longest part because it takes people a while. They don’t realize how much stuff is in their head. And then from there, we want to look at everything that’s there, and we want to go ahead and we want to identify “What has to be done tomorrow or there will be a significant negative external consequence?” Significant. It can’t be nothing. It has to be, “There will be a bill that hasn’t been paid,” “You will not be prepared for an event that is happening.”

The kind of stuff that, heaven forbid, if you ended up in a waiting room that day, you still would have to figure out how to do it on your phone, or you’d have to tell somebody that it wasn’t going to happen. That’s urgent. Everything else is not urgent. And the reason I say this is because, often with ADHD, we can really struggle with clarity of thought. And so, this is a very, very clear clarifying indicator. So, that’s step one.

Pete Mockaitis
And you say this only takes two minutes?

Skye Waterson
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Wouldn’t the listing of all the things take a long time?

Skye Waterson
That is true. It depends on how many tasks you have. It might take five. It usually doesn’t take longer than that.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Skye Waterson
But once you’ve done that, basically at this point, what you want to do is you want to go ahead, and this is really, you know, I’ve done this hundreds of times with lots of different professionals, and I’ve never had anybody have more than five tasks that are truly urgent for tomorrow. And this is across work, home, everything.

So, if we’re thinking about this, we’re going, “Okay, I now know what is truly urgent,” let’s look at the rest of the tasks and think about, “Okay, what are the tasks that are on this list that are going to help move me forward? What are the 80-20 tasks, those things that are going to help me with something?” So, that’s the stuff that you really want to highlight.

I usually recommend people highlight it in green, stick it in their calendar, give themselves a dopamine boost to get started. We can talk about that in a second. But these are things you really want to focus on and promote, because a lot of time we actually spend our time doing things that are neither urgent nor important. They’re just easy to take off, and that’s a big problem.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, we have a very clear picture for urgency, which is really nice in terms of getting that level of clarity from, “Well, yeah, there’s a lot of things which would be nice to kind of have done soon-ish,” as opposed to, “If these are not done today, suffering will ensue.” It’s like, “Okay. All right. Bright red line there,” and only five-ish things maybe rise above it.

Skye Waterson
Sometimes none. People are always surprised.

Pete Mockaitis
Hey, good news. So that’s a crystal clarity on the urgency. And, likewise, can we get that with importance? There’s 80-20.

Skye Waterson
One hundred percent.

Pete Mockaitis
Could you tell us how it is done?

Skye Waterson
Yeah, so that’s actually something that, when I work with people, I figure out first. And what we want to understand is we want to understand “What is your 80-20? So, first of all, what is your goal?” And this is where we have a whole conversation about setting goals and how we feel about setting goals, because I’ve never met someone with ADHD who doesn’t have a strong feeling about goals, positive or negative.

But we need to know the direction that you’re going in, in order to understand “What is the 20% thing that you could do that’s going to give you an 80% return to get there?” Because a lot of times, that’s actually something you’re already doing, and you just need to double down on, expand on. It’s not the new shiny thing that could totally work, but has not been tested even once. So, this is kind of what we want to focus on.

And so, usually, when we’re looking at that, what is truly important, it’s what is going to help you reach your goal, what’s the 20% that will give you 80% return on reaching your goal?

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, I love the 80-20 Rule, and that’s super. I guess, sometimes, it feels a little unclear, like, “Well, I don’t know, it might be any number of these things.” Do you have any follow-ups, or next-level questions, or prompts, or approaches to zero in on that?

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Usually, if you’re struggling with this because you don’t really know what your goal is. So, that’s what to focus on. So, the first thing I’ll do is I’ll ask people to identify, and this isn’t just me. This is some awesome, you know, I’ve had amazing mentors in my own life. Ask for a 25-year goal. So, we say, “Okay, 25 years from now, what are the five things that you want to have achieved?” And you’re going to be like, “Man, that was great. Like, I am nailing it”?

Because when we take it to 25 years, we’re usually at a position at that point where we are not in fear or we’re like, “Oh, I’ll probably figure it all out about that. What’s the point?” So, we sort of go, “Well, I want to be this.” Most people want, “I want to spend time with my family. I want to travel. I want to be healthy. I want to have money,” or whatever it is they want to do.

And then, at that point, we go in, and we say, “Okay, what is the one thing you could do this year that would make it easier for you to reach your 25-year goal?” That’s really what we’re talking about here. And it could be a financial decision, it could be an organizational decision, maybe it’s a health decision. And then at that point, we’re going, “Okay, now let’s come back into what we have to do, what we have on our task list right now. What is the thing that is helping you get there?” That often is where we get the best clarity.

And then if you’re really struggling, I actually do have an entire decision-making ADHD framework because it’s not uncommon to struggle with decision-making, and we go through some of the research behind the significance of tasks, and we talk about the margin of error and that kind of thing to help you figure out, “What is important to really spend time on when it comes to making a decision?”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, this framework is intriguing. Is this discussable in five to 10 minutes?

Skye Waterson
Yes. All of my stuff is very simple because, what I want is to practice. I want it to get, you know, people often say to me, like, “You’re in my head. I can’t get it out now in a good way because it’s, like, helping me understand things.” So, yeah, so basically, at a very, very basic level, and I’m going to mess up some statistics here so I apologize. Apologies for those of you who know what I’m talking about.

We want to talk about this idea of significance. So, even if we’re talking life-saving medication, “Should it be used? Should it be not used?” that kind of thing, there’s a 1% margin of error. So, there’s never something that is truly free from having a chance that it is incorrect.

So, if you think of yourself as all the decisions you make being on a continuum from 1% margin of error, very, very important decision, but still could be wrong to a 50-50 margin of error. You know, it really doesn’t matter. Flip coin, you know, red shirt, green shirt, whatever. It’s fine. Then we need to understand, “What is the margin of error that you are happy to have with the decision that you’re making? What is the amount that you’re happy to have in error?”

So, if somebody’s like, “I don’t know which of these things to focus on this week,” then I ask people, “Okay, well, what is the margin of error on this?” And, usually, people will probably say it’s about 30% because they’re like, “Well, it’s not that important. I don’t want to waste my week, but if I did the wrong thing, it’s not going to be the end of the world.”

And at this point, I will help you assign time to a margin of error. So, if it’s a 50-50 task, it really doesn’t matter what decision you make, then we will go ahead and say, “Okay, you’re just going to take a few minutes to make that decision.” If it’s the 1% margin of error, you could take a year to make that decision. But the most important thing is that you go ahead and you schedule that time to make that decision.

So, if it’s a 30%, 40% decision, which one is more important? I’d say, “Okay, let’s go ahead and we’ll schedule some time later today. Maybe we’ll schedule 20 minutes or 15 minutes. You’re going to sit down, look at all the options, weigh them up, maybe talk to somebody, ‘What do you think I should do?’ And then at the end of that 15 minutes, whatever decision you made at that point is the decision that you’re going to stick with.”

Pete Mockaitis
Now, when you say margin of error in percentage terms, I’m thinking, I’ve always got two different concepts in my head at the same time here. So, one is margin of error, if I’m making an estimate of how much something is going to cost, “Oh, I was off by 5%,” versus a margin of error in terms of thinking about, like, the consequences of error. So, just to make sure I’m conceptually getting this, what does the percent represent in our margin of error here?

Skye Waterson
The percentage that you’re willing to be wrong. So, in a 50% scenario, you’re saying, “I’m happy with a 50% margin of error because the decision I had to make was what are we going to eat tonight. Worst-case scenario, we pick something that I don’t really enjoy, and it’s a new experience for me. It’s totally fine.”

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I see. It’s like, “How certain must I be to be okay with this decision, such that if I got it, if there was a 50% chance of me getting it wrong, that means it doesn’t matter all that much if I get it wrong,” versus, “There must be 99% certainty of this because, if I mess up, you know, my whole family is dead.”

Skye Waterson
Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
“Thusly, I’m going to proportionately spend more resources on the actual decision-making research stuff of nailing that decision right.”

Skye Waterson
Exactly, because most of the time, with ADHD as well, we’ll have this thing. And if you have ADHD and you’re listening, you’ll probably be like, “Oh, yeah, I do this all the time,” where you won’t really decide to make the decision, you won’t lock it in as, “I’m going to make a decision.” It’ll just kind of go around in your head. You’ll think about it and you’ll ruminate on it.

But because we have working memory struggles, we’ll lose the thread of the decision we made. We might even talk to somebody and come back and go, “That’s it. That’s what I’m going to do. Oh, I’m glad I figured it out.” Never write it down. Forget that we made that thing and then go and do it again. And so, we can end up in this rumination cycle that is very, takes a lot of mental energy.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. I dig it. And so then, it seems like a lot of the value here is just getting clear that “What the task is, is making the decision. That is the project that we are embarked upon.”

Skye Waterson
You might even write that down and put it on your filter. That’s a hack for you right there.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, okay. That is the mission. That is the project, is the making of the decision, as opposed to, you jumping the gun and figuring out all the things, “If I do it and if I don’t do it.” It’s like, “Oh, well, we’re not even there yet.”

Skye Waterson
And then you’re like, “Oh, but what if…?” Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Cool. That’s handy. What else we got?

Skye Waterson
Well, I think the third piece that is often what I get from people is, “Okay, cool. I have made a decision. I now know what I need to do but I don’t want to do it. It’s too boring. It’s too confusing. The last time I did this, somebody yelled at me and I didn’t like it and I don’t want to do it again.” This is something that we don’t talk about enough with ADHD, or even without ADHD.

We often have these experiences, and so you’re going to guess it. I’ve used the research to come up with a strategy to help you do it in about 15 to 20 minutes.

Pete Mockaitis
All right, let’s hear it.

Skye Waterson
Okay. So, I want to ask you, “What is a task that you don’t want to do right now?”

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, let’s just say some tax stuff, yeah.

Skye Waterson
That’s a really good example. That’s a really good example. So, if you’re ADHD, the first thing that we want to do is we want to, and we talked about this before, we want to give you a reward for starting the task. We know the reward at the end is not really going to be attached to the task. It’s not going to be motivating enough to get you to do it. So, we want to give you a reward for starting the task.

And if you’re in a position where it’s tax stuff, we want to give you a really nice reward. So, at this point, people usually say, “Okay, well, Skye, I don’t want to eat piles of chocolate forever.” “That’s okay. We’re not going to do that. We’re going to sensory stack.”

So, if you think about your five senses – touch, taste, smell, sight, sound – what are the different sensory items that we could add to you sitting down at your desk, or sitting down at a coffee shop, or wherever you want to do the taxes? So where are you planning on doing this task?

Pete Mockaitis

In my office here at the computer.

Skye Waterson
Perfect. Okay. So, the reward has to be in your office at your desk. This is very important because of transition times. A lot of people will be on the couch, in front of the TV, being like, “I’m just trying to get the motivation to go do this,” and they’re like, “Why doesn’t this work?” It’s because you’re not doing it in the space.

So, if we think about the different senses, so food, drink, listening to something, watching something, what’s something fun you could do at the beginning of this task? So, it’s not part of the task. It’s just something you’re going to do for 10, 15 minutes.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, what’s funny, because, like, my first thought is, “Ooh, a fun thing I could do in my office at my computer is, like, play a game,” but that’s dangerous because you might get carried away, and do that for hours. Like, “Oh, this is so much. I don’t want to stop.”

Skye Waterson
It does have to be something you will stop. Yeah. It does have to be something you will stop. And so, I will say, over time, people can do things more, like playing a game. Your brain starts to trust you, that you’re going to do this, and it’s not going to be as terrible as it sounds.

But TikTok is never a good idea, so don’t do that one. But is there anything else? Sometimes people like to do Sudoku or a puzzle or a retro game or read a comic or an article or a YouTube video.

Pete Mockaitis
You know, what’s so fun, I’m looking right now in my office. I have this, this is so weird. I think Tim Ferriss talked about these acupressure mats, like Bed of Nails is one of the brand names. And I don’t know why it’s so fun for me to just kind of mush it against my body. Like, it’s kind of like the rush of a cold plunging a little bit, except not messy. It’s not painful, but it’s an intense sensation, which, at least for now, is still kind of novel and interesting. So, I guess we could call that a reward in a weird sense.

Skye Waterson
Yeah, 100%, so we could do that one. Now let’s stack it. So that’s good, but you’ve got to do taxes. So, we want to add something. Is there a cold beverage, a hot beverage, anything like that that you’d like to bring with you to your desk?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, sure. Well, I’m thinking about GT’s Gingerade Kombucha, or Heineken 0.0, or just straight up Diet Coke, I mean, you know.

Skye Waterson
Okay. Which is the one you want the most?

Pete Mockaitis
Probably the Kombucha right now, yeah.

Skye Waterson
Okay. Perfect. So, we’re adding the Kombucha. It’s very themed. And then let’s go ahead and add some music or something to watch while you do this.

Pete Mockaitis
Wow, watching at the same time as I’m doing a thing, or as I’m doing my acupressure and my beverage?

Skye Waterson
Yeah, as you’re doing your acupressure.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, man.

Skye Waterson
Because the first thing you’re doing is just something fun. So that’s the first thing you’re doing.

Pete Mockaitis
So, watching, well, if I really go on bonkers on the visuals, I might put on the Oculus Quest 3 and look at some, like, 8K nature videos.

Skye Waterson
That’s cool.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s kind of fun to do in the morning on a cloudy day. It’s kind something I do sometimes.

Skye Waterson
Yeah. Okay.

Pete Mockaitis
Or, I guess watching. I’m thinking about the Fireship YouTube channel. But, again, there’s danger there. YouTube fun, click, click, click, away, away you go. So, watching. What else do people love watching?

Skye Waterson
I mean, you’re right about the whole thing with views. I think some people will put like really cool digital backgrounds on their computers. Some people will just want to watch music videos. That can work, you know, things like that. Personally, I think I’ve got the weird one. I like to watch Twitch streams because I love gaming.

So, if I can’t get some gaming done, and so it gives me like a little piece of that. So, I might choose to do that while I use the mat and have the drink. But, yeah, something like that. Some people listen to music at this point. They don’t want to watch anything. So, they have a couple of pieces. I usually think three is quite nice, especially when you’re doing something that’s particularly difficult, so.

But the question I always want everyone to ask, and this is why we’re doing this live with you is, if you said to yourself, “Okay, forget the task, forget that task. All I’m saying to myself right now is, ‘Will I go and sit at my desk if it comes with a Kombucha, a Shakti Mat, and looking at something nice?’”

Pete Mockaitis
Sure.

Skye Waterson
Yep. Okay. Good. Perfect. Because that’s what we want to know. That’s the most important thing we want to know. So, the second thing that we do is, while we’re doing those things, while we’re giving our brain the boost, the dopamine boost, that we don’t think it’s getting because of the way our brains are currently wired, you want to go ahead and you want to turn off the distractions.

This is a good time to turn off distractions because you’re feeling good. So, who cares about them anyway? What is the stuff that you know is going to distract you when you get down to doing the taxes?

Pete Mockaitis
Well, probably, many open tabs or windows on the computer itself.

Skye Waterson
Exactly. So, we want to turn off the tabs. If you’ve got one of those situations where your brain almost goes ahead and clicks your email before you even think about it, go ahead and remove that bookmark, make it harder to find. If you need to, you can use apps like Freedom to fully remove it. You want to go ahead and remove distractions right now.

The next thing you want to do is you want to dial down the dopamine a little bit. So, maybe at this point, you just switch to music or a podcast or something in the background. Still there. We’re not going to silence just yet, but we’re dialing it down. And then at that point, what you want to do is you actually want to go ahead and write down, on a little Post-it note, a recipe of exactly what you’re going to get done.

So, “I need to open this application. I need to find this form. I need to do this.” And the reason you’re doing that is because you struggle with working memory, right? Too boring, too confusing, too, you know, “I felt bad last time I did it.” So, the too confusing piece, we want to break that right now.

We want to put it on a piece of paper, exactly what you’re going to get done during this period of time, as if you’re writing a recipe for somebody else because that person is probably you. Because if you have ADHD, you’re probably going to get distracted and forget what you were doing and have to come back to that little piece of paper. So, that’s the next piece. Does that make sense?

Pete Mockaitis
Yep.

Skye Waterson
Awesome. And then from there, the last piece we really get to is, “Okay, I’m here. I know what I’m doing. I’m feeling good, but I’m a little bit nervous about actually doing the task. Like, what if it goes badly?” And so, we want to give yourself the opportunity to do a few stretches. When you’re about to do exercise, or artistic endeavors will often stretch or do some practice runs. We don’t really do that with work tasks.

So, we want to just open the application that you’re going to use and tinker around in it a little bit, you know, move some stuff, add some notes, just play in it with no real pressure to get started. And, usually, what’s happened at this point is people have gone ahead and they have found themselves in position where they’re like, “Okay, well, I’ve already opened the application. I know exactly what I’m doing. And I already gave myself a dopamine boost and turned off all distractions.” Inertia starts to go the other way and you go, “Well, I might as well just do it now.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, that’s really intriguing. So, then the reward is happening before instead of after. And I guess my concern is that I’d be enjoying myself so much, I’m like, “I just want to keep this party going. Now I really don’t want to stop all this fun for the taxes.” Is that not a problem? Or, how does that end up unfolding?

Skye Waterson
It’s a good question. So, what we talk about here is we talk about the idea of the dopamine dial. So, rather than going ahead and just going, “Well, I gave myself a reward at the beginning, and then I turn everything off and we get serious and get to work.” We talk about a dopamine dial. We dial the dopamine down.

So, we don’t just turn it off. We say, “Yeah, the party can keep going. We’re just going to write a list of tasks that need to be done right now.” But let’s just switch it away from the podcasts. What’s the next thing that might work? What about some music? Is that going to work? We still got the drinks. We still got everything there. And your brain’s kind of going like, “This is pretty cool.” Still like, “I’m not panicking yet. We’re not in a dopamine-deprived state yet.”

And then from there, you’re like, “Well, we’re just going to open the application. We’re going to tinker around in it.” What happens for most people at that point is they start to kind of get this situation, which you might’ve found in the past where you go, “This is kind of distracting me now. Like, I know what I’m doing. I know I’ve got to do it. I know it’s on. It’s something that’s on my list, and I need to get it done. And I’m right here and I’m about to do it. This music is kind of distracting me now.”

So, you’ll tend to naturally start to turn those things off, but it’s when you give yourself the pressure of, “Now I’m starting,” that we can get ourselves in that position.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Very cool. All right. So, that’s really handy and thoughtful and thorough. Thank you. Any other favorite do’s and don’ts for we don’t want to do the thing, but it’s time to do the thing, how do we proceed?

Skye Waterson

Well, honestly, I think the biggest thing that I would say to everybody is you think that you know how to give yourself a reward for starting a task. You probably don’t. If you’ve sat here and gone, “Yeah, I mean I have a coffee,” this is level one of this, right?

We want to go all the way to level 10. Like, most people that I see who fail to actually get tasks done once they understand the strategy, they fail to get tasks done because of a feeling that, “I ought to be able to just do it. I should just be able to do it. I don’t understand why I can’t do it. Everyone else can do it.”

And that feeling, unfortunately, can hold you back from actually doing the task. So, usually, at this point, I ask people to get really serious about their dopamine. Make a list. Five things for each sense, for each of your different senses, like, combine them in different ways. Like, get serious about this, because this is often the thing that’s really holding you back.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, now I’m thinking about dialing the dopamine up to 10, I mean, well, that invites all sorts of thoughts, like, “Oh, well, let’s crank some, let’s get some alcohol and nicotine and more involved in the party.”

Skye Waterson
That’s exactly what I’m saying. Everyone’s like, “Oh, well, this must be what you’re talking about.” And it’s like, “No, no, there’s many different ways,” you can ask ChatGPT or your favorite AI if you need help. But, like, there’s many different strategies before we get there, right? So, a lot of times people, for example, with the phone, people say, “Okay, well I have my phone. I’m addicted to my phone. What do I do?”

Like, before phones, we used to have, I don’t know if you’ve ever were in an office before phones, but, like, we had a ton of things. It was like the little thing that you like to throw a basketball into, and the Sudoku, and the weird little like water thing that you pressed and little hoops went into it.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah.

Skye Waterson
You know what I mean? There’s like a whole thing.

Pete Mockaitis
Severance had that one.

Skye Waterson
Exactly. So, go in that direction and then think about, during the week when you’re at the supermarket, what is a new cold drink that you’ve never tried before? Grab that off the shelf. Leave that for when you’re going to get started off on that next task. Those are the things that you would be surprised make a huge difference.

And, you know, obviously, we can always talk about the hardcore negative sources of dopamine, but that conversation is actually why we end up in that situation where everyone’s, like, we’re either dopamine deprived. And if you’re ADHD, you’re already dopamine deprived. So, it’s not really a helpful conversation a lot of the time.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, for funsies, could you give us just a quick rundown of a few of your favorite tidbits? Because, yeah, I think you’re right. Once we really let the creative juices flow, I mean, sometimes I have a feeling, it probably gets pretty, like, weird and uniquely custom for your own proclivity.

Skye Waterson
Oh, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Like, I actually do have, now you mentioned, a Tupperware vessel of water in the refrigerator that I will shove my face into. And so, the mammalian dive reflex is a real thing. It reduces heart rate, etc. And it just feels kind of fun. And so, I guess, if we’re pushing our own buttons, then that could take all kinds of interesting flavors. Can you share a few things with us?

Skye Waterson
Yeah, I love that because people often, you know, this level one dopamine is, like, “I’ll get coffee and then I’ll do this.” And level 10 is like, “On Wednesdays, at 7:00, if I do this in this light, this is great.” People get very specific. My favorites, I mean, I love all kinds of different carbonated drinks, is my favorite. So, I’ll go for different kinds of those ones.

I, like I said, will watch Twitch. I will also watch YouTube. I know not everyone can do that. They’ll get distracted. I am lucky enough not to do that. I have, the Spotify AI guy now has me pretty well dialed in. So, if I play the DJ, it usually knows exactly what kind of music I want to listen to because it’s got me based on time of day.

Yeah, those are kind of the biggest ones that I do. In terms of physical touch, I have a lot of fidgets. And if all else fails, I’ll usually go to a coffee shop and I’ll go there with no ability to plug my computer in, and I’ll order something really nice, and that’ll kind of get me through.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, tell me, any final things, tips, tricks, things you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Skye Waterson
I think, usually, what I like to tell people is just your systems are probably broken, not your brain. I think it’s really important for people to understand that because so often we people will find themselves sort of slamming up against a wall again and again and again.

That’s what leads to burnout. I’ve done it many, many times before I figured out I had ADHD. And being able to work with different systems makes it a lot more fun. It’s not just better for you and what you do, but it’s also a lot more fun.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, now could you share a favorite quote?

Skye Waterson
Yeah, my favorite quote is, “We rise by lifting others.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite book?

Skye Waterson
At the moment, I am reading most things by Naval Ravikant. So that’s kind of the area I’m in right now.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool?

Skye Waterson
It’s split between Notion and Miro.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite habit?

Skye Waterson

Dopamine. Starting with dopamine, for sure.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And is there a key nugget or Skye-original sound bite that is quoted often?

Skye Waterson
I think a lot of people, to come back to the dopamine thing, will just be like, you know, that people tend to say like, “You have to take your dopamine seriously. You have to take having fun as seriously as working if you have ADHD.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Skye Waterson
You can find me at Unconventional Organisation on Instagram. Like I said, you can just DM me there and I will give you the two-unit folks formula. And you can also find me at Unconventional Organisation on the internet. I have a podcast, The ADHD Skills Lab, where I talk about a lot more of this research. And if you want to join my program, I work with executives and entrepreneurs who have ADHD who want focused, balanced growth.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for someone looking to be awesome at their job?

Skye Waterson
Probably, stop trying so hard and start thinking about ways to do things differently.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Skye, thank you.

Skye Waterson

No worries. Great to be here.

1039: How to Stop Wasting Time on Email with Randall Dean

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Randall Dean shares practical tips for taming an overwhelming inbox.

You’ll Learn

  1. The best time-saving investment you can make
  2. How to keep unread emails from flooding your inbox
  3. The inbox shortcuts that’ll save you hours

About Randy

Randy Dean, The E-mail Sanity Expert®, author of Amazon bestseller Taming the E-mail Beast, is an expert on time & e-mail management and the related use of technology. For 25+ years his humorous and engaging programs have given attendees key strategies on better managing their time, e-mail, apps & technology.

Resources Mentioned

Thank You, Sponsors!

Randall Dean Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Randy, welcome!

Randall Dean
It’s great to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m so excited. We’re talking email. You are the Email Sanity Expert, registered trademark. So, I’d love to start by hearing a little bit in working with so many people and their email, is there anything that’s particularly surprising to you that you’ve learned about us professionals and doing email?

Randall Dean
Well, you know what’s interesting, I’ve been leading programs on this topic for 20 years now, started my company all the way back in 2004, and what I’ve learned over all this time is that not only are people spending, I think, the average that I saw in a published study was a little bit more than two hours per day, but at a lot of the conference events, conventions, places that I speak, I’m getting people answering anywhere from three to six hours a day just on their inbox.

The interesting contrarian fact and statistic that I’ve discovered, I ask people at these programs, I go, “How many of you have had prior training?” And if it’s an audience that I haven’t spoken with before, it’s less than 5%. Less than 5%, not just here in the United States, Canada, Mexico. I’ve spoken in Europe several times on this. And in all of those places almost no one has had strategic or technical training on how to be more efficient with their email on a tool that’s taking 25% to 50% or more of their workday. It’s crazy.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s what’s funny is I think we have a sense, or I have a sense, and I think I’m getting the vibe from other professionals, that we’re spending “too much time” on meetings and emails. Well, first, I just want to check that assertion for validity, because I guess it’s conceivably possible that even if you are spending six hours on email a day, if most of these messages are thoughtful works of written craftsmanship in which you are casting a vision and offering clear guidance, and wisdom, and leadership, and insight, and clarification, and coordination that that might be okay.

Like, you’re doing work. You’re doing knowledge work at a high level. You’re spending six hours on email but those six hours are well-spent in these communications. Tell, Randy, how often is that the case? Or, is, in fact, our assertion correct, that that’s too darn much?

Randall Dean
I would actually say for the vast majority of people, they’re not doing what you just described.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Randall Dean
They’re dealing with 200 emails a day, and they’re trying, in a mass flurry, to get through them as fast as they possibly can, and they’re not writing terribly high-quality and high-level communications. They’re just trying to get through the flood of information that’s coming in at them. It’s funny because I actually talk about email etiquette sometimes and I’m actually of the point, like, make the subject line sort of say what is in the email.

If there’s tasks inside the email, make sure people, right up front, know who’s got what tasks. And if you can’t get down to bullet points, it’s almost the exact opposite of what you just said in terms of crafting really nicely crafted communications. And I actually even mentioned that, if you are going to write something that’s sort of wordy and requires extra time and effort to go through it, you should probably turn that into an actual document, like a Word doc or a PDF so that you attach it to the email, so people slow down and read it more carefully.

Because one of the problems that they have is if it’s sort of a long email in terms of message length and density, a lot of people are just scanning over the top of them and not getting into them because they’ve got too many coming in.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, Randy, you’re bringing back a fun memory of my first kind of grown-up internship was at Eaton Corporation in Pittsburgh, and I was part of this program, and the one coordinating the program, her name was Amber. And it was funny, her email signature had “Thank you for your attention to this communication,” like in all of her emails.

And it was so funny, I don’t know if this is what she was going for, but it caused me, an insecure 19-, 20- year-old intern to say, “Oh, shucks, I didn’t actually spend much attention on your communication. I better read it again.”

Randall Dean
Yeah, and the thing is, I always tell people, “If somebody’s getting 150-200 emails a day, and you’re barraging them with a 14-paragraph soliloquy, and they miss something, is that really their fault for missing something? Maybe it’s your fault for not getting to the point, you know? So, yeah. Now that doesn’t mean you throw out all rules for appropriate grammar and etiquette.

But I also am a believer that email is best used when communications are simple, obvious, and straightforward. And the minute they start getting complex or confusing, it might be time to pick up the phone or go find the person.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, or, I guess, we’ll talk alternatives and tools. I personally love the Loom video, if we’re remote and asynchronous, in terms of, “Hey, these are my thoughts on this matter and some detail. So, you can see my face, hear my voice, see the document, or whatever we’re talking about at the same time.” So, okay, understood.

It sounds like it’s quite rare that email time is time brilliantly spent, and we may, even if we do need to craft a beautiful something, it might be better off in a document. And so, the Tim Cook’s up early in the morning, emailing the day’s leadership wisdom for each of his key team members, it sounds like that’s not what most of emailing is.

Randall Dean
That’s really funny because, I mean, if you’re at Tim Cook’s level and his senior leadership team’s level, then maybe what you described at the start of this conversation might work. Most of the people that are coming into my audiences are administrative professionals, mid-level to low-senior level managers and directors, and they’re just dealing with a barrage of messages, and they’re trying to figure out what they need to get done within these messages, who they need to follow up with from these messages, and how to then turn that into a work day.

And so, a big part of what I’m doing is like, “Okay, here’s how you go through this stuff to figure out what’s important, what’s urgent and what’s not.” So, I think that that’s been a big part of the struggle.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, I hear you. So, that’s kind of the email vibe we’re talking about here is tons of incoming things, kind of unprocessed, unsorted, that need to be gotten through. And I’m thinking we had Cal Newport, we talked about A World Without Email on the show, and he used the phrase, just haunting, “In some corporate environments, we are human network routers.”

Randall Dean
That’s a good way to put it. I like that a lot.

Pete Mockaitis
In terms of, “Okay, here’s a message that’s coming to me. Okay, I can do this thing. I can forward it. No, it doesn’t belong to me, it belongs over here, forward there.” So, for many of us, it’s about processing large volumes, and having help is awesome. Shout out to my producers. I just forward all my pitches to them and they know what to do. It’s like, “Read all of these thoughtfully and tell me which ones are fantastic finalists.” And so, I don’t read 90% of the pitches in my email, and that’s awesome that they do that for me. I greatly appreciate them.

Randall Dean
And that’s a perfect delegation right there, that not enough people, I think, are doing. And so, I always tell people, “If you’re more of a senior level in your management chain and you feel like you’re spending way too much time, especially on low-level emails, that’s a mismatch because you’re getting paid to do higher-level work than low-level emails.”

So, you got to find a way to sort of fix that a little bit. And it’s probably going to require a reallocation of some of the messaging so that you’ve got somebody else helping you with screening a bit. I think that’s a really good way to put it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, I am tempted to jump into tips and tactics, but, first, maybe, can you orient us to, you mentioned, okay, almost none of us get training in this. Can you give us a glimmer of hope or inspiration? What’s on the other side of this? Let’s say we do get some training from this insightful conversation with Randy or more, what’s possible? In terms of when we’ve got our email game optimized, what’s the before-after transformation look like?

Randall Dean
I think email is what you could call a necessary nuisance. It’s something you have to deal with and we’re not going to get rid of it. I don’t see anywhere on the horizon where email is going to completely go away. But when you think about what it is, the vast majority of what’s coming in are what I basically say are a whole bunch of hungry squirrels with the occasional big angry dog, right?

And so, basically, you’re trying to figure out, “Which one of these is the big angry dog that’s barking? And how do I reduce the distraction of all these hungry little squirrels?” And so, when you say “What’s on the other side?” I think having a logical triage mentality with processing your emails that requires some new habits.

But if you get into the habits, and you do it well, you will look at your emails less times per email, you might look at your inbox less times per day in total, you will be able to better identify what’s really important or urgent, and you’ll end up without such a big cluttered mess so that it’s not a distraction in and of itself.

You know, I would bet almost every program I’m into, maybe 15-20% of the audience has more than a thousand emails in their inbox that haven’t even been filed or deleted. And I mean that’s common. So, if you’re in that boat, you’ve got a lot of company. But I can also tell you, I know that when you’ve got just got pages and pages and pages of email streaming in your inbox, some marked unread, some flagged, some starred, most of them not, and you don’t know what is most important, that’s stress. I mean, I just think that’s the definition of stress, and it doesn’t have to be that way.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, yeah. As you described that scene, I could actually feel my heart rate ticking up a bit. So, okay, less stress, fewer times, fewer total minutes there. Could you ballpark it for us? I mean, I’m sure it varies a lot based on roles and responsibilities and email volume. But in terms of untrained to email Jedi Master, what kind of email time savings might we realize?

Randall Dean
Well, it’s interesting. I had one of my university clients at one time, they had to sort of justify the expense of bringing me in to do the program. They did an ROI justification. And what they did was really cool. They actually asked people about a week or two after the program how much time they thought they were saving from the tips they learned in the program, and how confident they were, they were saving that much time.

And, now, the average person was basically saying they were saving more than two hours a week with a good number of them as much as four to six hours per week. Now, I know that may not sound like a lot, but if you could get a half day to three quarters of a day of additional productivity time every week, I think you’d be pretty happy with that.

Pete Mockaitis
Absolutely. And my mind just leaps to running the spreadsheet. So, two hours a week times 50 work weeks a year, 100 hours. What’s that annual rate for those employees? And now that time spent more valuably. So, Randall, unless your workshops cost a quarter million dollars, I’m pretty sure they got their money’s worth.

Randall Dean
Yeah, I mean, I think it’s easy, low-hanging fruit return on investment. I believe that we figured out that if you extrapolate those findings across all users in the room, that the first year ROI in and of itself was over 2,000%.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. That’s what I like to hear.

Randall Dean
Because, like I said, it would be a different math if half the people or more already had this training, but if it’s literally 5% or less, it’s almost impossible not to see a significant productivity improvement.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, we’re fired up, Randy. Lay it on us, what do we do to realize these gains?

Randall Dean
Well, when I teach my programs, I’m mostly speaking to professionals using tools like Microsoft Outlook or Gmail, and one of the first things you have to do is just understand how software works. Most people don’t know what the software can actually do. And one of my first tips to anybody is, if you’re using a piece of software frequently, daily, multiple hours per day, there may be no better use of your time if you want to be more efficient to spend a little bit of time at least every week learning another new tip.

Because, by learning that extra tip or two over time, you’re just going to get so much more efficient and so much more time back just by understanding how the software works.

And the one example, really interesting thing, because most people are self-taught, I’m going to play a scenario out for you that happens super frequently for a lot of people. They get an email, they open it, they read it far enough to go, “I don’t have time for this right now,” and then they mark it unread or they flag it or they star it. Okay, now right there, let me share with you the statistic that I believe comes from that behavior right there.

The average professional email user tends to look at each and every email they receive, on average, three to seven times before they finally take a smart action with that item. And I think a big part of the reason that’s happening is because they read it, they go, “I don’t have time,” they mark it unread, they flag it, they star it. It stays in the inbox. This is where your inbox mess is coming from too. And then what happens is you’ve just guaranteed you’ve got to go back and look at it again later.

And so, you’re not doing anything. I mean, you’re really not doing anything with that input, but you are giving it time that is basically worthless time that you’re throwing away. And so, one of the things that I share with the people is a little triage method, sort of based a little bit on the work of David Allen, who wrote the book Getting Things Done. I took training from him all the way back in the early ‘90s. And one of the things that I learned from him is, if something is quick, you do it right now.

Pete Mockaitis
Two-minute rule.

Randall Dean
Yeah. If it’s quick, you do it right now, and don’t you dare keep it for later. I love this. Somebody said, “Let’s go to Ohio. OHIO, only handle it once,” right? So, that should be your philosophy when you run into something quick. And I always challenge people in my programs, “If you’re looking at an email, you figure out what you need to do, and it’s only going to take you a couple minutes, and you don’t have time to do that? Why are you looking at your email? Shouldn’t you just keep working on what’s on fire? Why are you looking at your messages if you don’t have time to handle a quick little thing?” So, keep your focus.

But then, when I talked about what’s inside the software, both Outlook, classic Outlook, new Outlook, as well as Gmail have internal capabilities to take an email and quickly convert it into a related task or calendar item.

And so, I say take a few more seconds to get to the point where you know what you need to do next and then turn that item into a task or calendar item. And then once you’ve done that, if you haven’t got it done, but you got it on your task list or calendar, get it out of your inbox. Because, I mean, you’re done for now. It’s time to either file it for later reference or delete it if you don’t need it. And if you don’t have a good place to put it, make one and put it there. Not really rocket science.

I, sometimes, am surprised I get away with this as a living because, really, it’s sort of advanced common sense, but people just don’t think it all the way through, and they’re very inconsistent with how they’re triaging these messages.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, what’s interesting is, I think the reason you are getting away with it is because there’s some psychological things at play here.

Randall Dean

Absolutely.

Pete Mockaitis

Because whenever you go to the email, it’s like, “Ooh, here’s new interesting things. Oh, and some of it’s really important and urgent. I better handle it right away.” So, we’re almost never in the mind space like, “Okay, fire up Outlook, fire up Gmail. Hey, you know what? I wonder what all this software is capable of?” Like, we’re not in that headspace to do that.

And those functions, I guess, we’re not as accustomed to them, as well as thinking about the GTD, Getting Things Done, David Allen kind of philosophies of the inbox is merely a temporary repository by which it means, “Hey, you haven’t looked at me yet. Process me out of here in one way or another.” As opposed to, “Let me be the long-term storage facility for messaging.”

Randall Dean

Far too many people are using their inbox for three things. One is to receive and process new items. Two, is their de facto, but very dirty and highly disorganized task list. And, three, is their Uber storage for all things that haven’t left that inbox. And my strong belief, especially with my background understanding some of the GTD-type philosophies is the only one of those three that’s valid is processing new items. That’s what your inbox should be for is processing new items.

If you can deal with it quickly, you get it done. If you can’t deal with it quickly, it then becomes part of your task list or calendar because there, in your task list and calendar, once you understand those tools, you’ll be able to say, “What is the best use of my time right now? Where should I be putting my focus?” And you can’t really do that easily in a big messy cluttered inbox with 200 things marked unread and flagged. It’s just not going to work well.

And then, of course, once you’ve either got it done, got it on your task list, got it on your calendar, get it out of there. You don’t need it in there anymore.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah. So, help us out, if we’re worried, like, “Okay, I read a message and I realize, hmm, this is going to take some more thought and attention, and it is not to be dealt with now. I’m not leaving it in my inbox. So, what am I doing with it? And how do I make sure I don’t forget about it and lose it if it’s not in my inbox?”

Randall Dean

Now, simultaneously, when I teach the tip about putting it especially into your task list, I also show in both programs how you can turn on reminders. And then, so what will happen is that task will pop back up on your screen at a time when it’s better for you to see it. Not the email, the task, although the email text is typically inside the task that’s been created.

And so, that way you can say, “Okay, I’ve identified what needs to be done. It’s going to come back and find me when I need to see it. I don’t need to leave it where I have it right now. I can put this thing away if I need to keep it for later, or get rid of it if I don’t need it.” And, I think, by utilizing the reminders that are available in both task and calendar, you can relieve some of that stress.

Of course, now I’m going to say this, I regularly get my inbox down to close to zero every day, which makes a lot of sense because I’m teaching people how to work their inbox. But because of that, what I’m trying to teach people is, once you get that inbox down to close to zero, that’s when you shift your focus to your task list and your calendar by habit.”

“If there’s nothing on my calendar right now, no meetings or blocked time for anything, then I work my task list until it’s time to go back and check my email again, or go to my next meeting.” And so, you just sort of get into this habit of where you’re surfing across those three tools throughout the day, balancing your needs to get your critical focused work done with your needs to periodically get back to people.

And I think if you can get yourself into that habit, that flow, you can both reduce the distraction of your email, reduce the time spent on your email, and potentially increase the time you’re spending on your more important stuff, which is the goal of all this anyway.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, let’s say we’ve scheduled a time, we’re going to spend 30 minutes or so processing this email, and just rocking through it. How do you recommend we execute this step by step? You mentioned triage.

Randall Dean

Yeah. Well, like I said, I think if you’re going to open an email, you look at it once. If you look at it, what do I need to do with it? If it’s quick, deal with it now. OHIO, only handle it once. If it’s not quick, it goes on to your task list or calendar, and then you either file it for later reference or you delete it. And if you don’t have a good place to file it, make one and put it there.

And I will say this, nobody’s perfect at this. I’m not perfect at this. But the closer I get to following that triage mentality when it comes to processing new inputs, especially at the start of the day, but maybe a few more times throughout the day, the more efficient I feel myself getting at dealing with this, once again, necessary nuisance, and keeping the squirrels under control.

So, that’s sort of the goal is, “I want to keep these squirrels from taking over. I want to be in control of this input stream.” And the way to be in control of that is by having a good consistent strategy, habit, routine on how you deal with them and try to stick as close to it as you possibly can.

How much time would you save over a year if you went from looking at the typical email three to seven times, down to once maybe twice max? How much time would that give you in a year?

Pete Mockaitis

Well, it sounds like perhaps 100 plus hours.

Randall Dean

I would think so.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, so you mentioned, learn the software. And I remember there was a day, and I was. I was just goofing around in Gmail, and I think in the settings, I saw enable shortcut keys.

Randall Dean

Yeah, yeah, I show that in my Gmail sessions. I actually go in the settings and I click on the link that says keyboard shortcuts. And, I mean, like that’s a classic example. It’s right there in your settings. You click on it, it opens up. It says shortcuts for computer, for Android, for iPad, right? And I’m like, “My gosh.” And then it’s got like 14 categories of ways you can use the shortcuts; each one is its own drop menu with a whole list of potential shortcuts.

And I tell people, I go in there and I show it, and I say, “Now look at this. This is a classic example. Print that. Print it onto a sheet of paper, set it right next to your computer, highlight two, three, four of these things that you want to get really good at, and then practice them for the next week or so. And then once you feel like you got those ones down, cross those out, highlight two, three, four more.

Once you get those done, then go back to the next drop panel and print that one and do the same thing. And if you just did that, picked up two, three of these keyboard shortcuts a week over the next year, you’d be like a maestro. I mean, you would be fantastic and so much more efficient at just doing the normal little stuff on your computer because now you don’t have to move your mouse to do it.

Pete Mockaitis

Absolutely. When I made the discovery, I was astonished at so many levels. One, I thought, “How is it that these have been here the whole time and I was not aware?” Two, “Why were these not just automatically turned on as the default setting?” because I guess it was not at the time. Maybe it still is not. And, three, “How come none of my friends, who know I love productivity, ever felt the need to share this with me,” probably because they assumed I already knew it, and it would be insulting to bring it up to me.

Randall Dean

I’m going to give you a different assumption.

Pete Mockaitis

All right.

Randall Dean

They don’t know about them either, because nobody has the time to go take a look. That’s why I said, especially if you’re using Gmail, just in the last week, I saw two things that have changed. They’re constantly working on things behind the scenes. One of them was really minor. They moved it from the little three dots at the top of the screen to the little three dots over to the side of the screen.

And so, I was doing a live program, and I go where it’s always been, and I’m like, “Uh-oh, it’s not there anymore.” And then, just out of nature, I went over to the one, “Oh, there it is. They moved it.” And they’re doing that kind of stuff constantly. And so, I think when you’re using a tool like Gmail, as well as maybe the new and Web Outlook because those are sort of Cloud-based, real-time being updated type tools, you want to go in and look into your toolkit quite frequently because there’s new stuff showing up all the time.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, that’s telling. And you’re right, and doesn’t take a lot of shortcut knowledge. The ones I use all the time is J for next message and E for archive message.  And you can do a lot of damage if you just say, that’s how I like to triage, I go, “What are the emails I can archive without even really reading? Like, I can just know these can disappear in under three seconds.”

And I go J-E, J-E, J-J-E, E, J-J-J. And it’s just like, boom, flying through it. And it does feel like you’re a maestro. It’s cool. Can you share with us, what are some other software discoveries that are eye-opening and game-changing for people?

Randall Dean

Well, I think one of the biggest ones that most people don’t realize, both Outlook and Gmail, you can actually utilize the Signatures tool as an automated response template manager. So, basically, like let’s say there are certain messages you’re sending all the time, and the same question keeps coming up over and over again. You go into your Sent folder to find the last time you sent it so you can forward it again until the next time you need to send it again.

And every time you’re doing that, you’re spending, I don’t know, a minute, two, three looking for this thing in your sent folder. You could just copy and paste the text of that message. Go into your Signatures tool in both Outlook and Gmail, create a new signature, give it a name, paste that text into the copy field with your signature at the bottom and hit OK. And now from this point forward, that message reply is push button.

So, as soon as somebody sends you the message, you just copy their email address, you go up to your signature, you pop that into the message, put their name in the Send field, personalize the “Hi, Joe” and then, boom, in like five seconds, you’re sending that message. Not two minutes. Five seconds. And so, that’s like a great example of a way that once you learn the way the software works and what it can do. I always tell people get the word signatures out of your head, replace it with automated email sender, and use that three to five times a day, that you just got half an hour right there.

Pete Mockaitis

Lovely. Well, boy, there is so much we could cover. So, Randy, I’ll just leave it to you to curate. Could you give us maybe the top three transformational tips or practices in terms of this takes very few minutes but it will yield you very many hours?

Randall Dean

One of the things, and this is a little bit of a technical tip, so I’ll describe it, but it always gets the oohs and aahs when I’m doing my program. Did you know that you can just highlight a piece of text in Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Google Docs? You can highlight it, release the click, then pick it up and move it to a different place.

And here’s the thing, it’s like almost like a shortcut to copy and paste, cut and paste. And the thing is that it works on all of these tools – Outlook, Word, Excel, PowerPoint, OneNote, Microsoft Teams, Google Docs, Google Slides, even on a lot of web forms it works. And if you can get really good at this, it’s like this quick little thing that you can do to allow you to take a piece of information that’s in the wrong place in your document or file, and quickly move it to the right place in your document or file.

And little tips like that, I think, can, you know, I will say, you know, when I show that to people and they’re all going like, “I didn’t know that I could do that.” I go, “Ah, I just gave you three days this year. There’s your three days.”

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, I guess we’re saving the Command X and the Command V steps in doing that. Okay.

Randall Dean

And, I mean, it’s literally going to save you a second or two every time, but that second or two, multiplied by 40,000 times a year, it’s going to add up. The other one that I love is that a lot of people don’t realize this. When you’re creating folders, that you can use a special character, like an exclamation point, or even a number, and that will allow your folders to supersede alphabetization. So, what you can do is identify the folders you use the most or that are most important, and move them to the top of your folders list.

And that’s another one that is just like a no-brainer, super time saver, because now, instead of having to go all the way through the alphabet, you’re truncating that, and you can get to the folders you use most frequently right there at the top of your list. And that works not just in your email. It works in both Outlook and Gmail, but it also works in tools like OneDrive and Google Drive with your folders for your documents and files. You can actually move up your most used folders to the top and save a ton of time there, too.

Pete Mockaitis

Nifty. Okay. What else have you got?

Randall Dean

The other one that I really love is to get into the settings, you might need to go into rules in Outlook. You can also do this in New Outlook. You might have to go into Settings, Mail, Notifications. So, they’ve sort of moved it just a little bit. And in Gmail, you might have to go in and set up a filter to do this to make it all work.

But the basic tip is this, identify who your most important senders are. You know how I talked about the big angry dog? You want to identify, “Who sends me emails that are my big angry dogs?” Because what you can do in these tools is you can then go in and tell Outlook and Gmail, “These are my most important people. So, when they send me a message, I would like a pop-up or I would like a unique sound.”

And that means that you don’t necessarily have to get distracted by every squirrel, but when it’s one of those most important people, you certainly can. You can be, “Okay, boom! You know what? I’ll make a different sound, ‘Dun-da-dun-dun’ instead of ‘Doo-doo-doo-doon,’” you’ve been here for years and years, you’ll hear the “Duh-duh-duh-duh-duh.” “Oh, I got to stop for a second, I got to see what this one is.”

And so, that way you don’t feel like you have to look at everything coming in right now because you know that the really important things are going to probably jump up and get you, which means that actually, you might feel a little bit more comfortable keeping your focus on things, knowing that it’s going to tell you when the big angry dogs bark.

And I’ll even add one little micro thing about this. That same capability of setting up those rules can also allow you to set rules to auto-delete things that you don’t want to see at all. So, not only can it help you know when your most important people are trying to get a hold of you. It can also get rid of a bunch of the junk and spam automatically so it’s not even taking two seconds of your time.

Pete Mockaitis

Cool.

Randall Dean

So, it’s both sides. It helps on both sides of this. One last thing I’ll say is Outlook, specifically, will even allow you to set a priority level. So, like, I want to know when I get an email from my boss that is marked important. See, and it will only make the special sound when it’s from my boss marked important.

In that way if you’ve got an enlightened boss, who’s also taken my program, they’re going to learn that they should only mark emails important when they want faster action. Everything else can just be processed in normal strategy. And I always make the joke, “If every email you send is marked urgent or important, none of your emails are truly urgent or important.”

Pete Mockaitis

Understood. Well, tell me, Randy, any final things you want to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Randall Dean

Once you get this efficiency regained, then you can actually take advantage of some of the other tools in in the suite – calendar, contacts, tasks, notes, maybe tools like OneNote or Google Keep, Teams, Drive, Planner – to get significantly more prioritized and strategic with that extra time you’ve now created.

And if you can get to where, you know, you get that email under control, it’s not taking quite as much of your day, you’re getting some of these efficiencies in time, then maybe you can actually step your game up to be a little bit more prioritized, more strategic, more effective, because now you’ve got this new necessary nuisance under control a bit.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, thank you. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Randall Dean

Well, it’s funny. I put it in my book. The quote is from Gandhi. It’s, “Be the change you wish to see in the world.” But I then put right under it, “Be the change you wish to see in your inbox.” 

Pete Mockaitis

All right. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Randall Dean

It’s more than 20 years old now, it was by the group called Basics. And they actually did a study where they got permission to go into a whole bunch of different organizations, have their researchers stand around just waiting and watching for people getting unexpectedly interrupted, and they tracked what happened.

And they found an interesting thing, that people that get unexpectedly interrupted in the workplace, after that interruption has been handled, they answered the question, they had the conversation, they get off the phone call. The interruption is now over. If they’re not ready for that interruption when it first occurred, they will then spend an additional four to 15 minutes each and every time before they get back to what they were working on, because they lost their place and they forgot what they were doing.

And so, the little micro tip that I share is, if somebody interrupts you, you can just go, “One second, please,” grab a sticky note and write down exactly what it is you need to do next on whatever you’re working on, put that right on your computer screen. And the goal of that is so that you’re basically leaving yourself bookmarks throughout the day, “Oh, yeah, that’s what I was doing.”

So, the interruptions can still happen, and I even say, I think it will help your communication quality because if you don’t do that, what are you very often doing the whole time you’re talking to that person?

Pete Mockaitis

To remember you’re still doing the thing, yeah.

Randall Dean

Trying to remember where you’re at, which means what are you not doing, listening? And that is where mistakes and errors of omission creep in, too. So, I think that’s just a classic little study that can then morph into it. And I always conflate that, you know, four to fifteen minutes per, and then I will ask my audience, I’ll go, “What do you think, 10 to 25 a day, 10 to 25 unexpected phone calls, stop-bys, interruptions, text messages?” And people give me the head nod.

I go, “If I’m right on this, that means you’re losing 45 minutes to as much as two hours a day just because you’re getting distracted that many times per day. And if you can get it down to where you have a strategy for that, that could create another hour or two, daily.”

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah. And a favorite book?

Randall Dean

It’s called Clutter’s Last Stand by Don Aslett.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. And a favorite habit?

Randall Dean

Don’t start your day in your inbox. Start your day in your calendar for a few minutes. Not just looking at today, but looking forward to see if there’s anything coming you need to get ready for. Are there any blocks of time that you could block for more strategic use on your key projects or activities? And then build a short, focused task list for today that matches your key projects and responsibilities, but also your available time.

If you’re doing that right, that should only take you three to five minutes at the start of the day. But you want to do that before you even dare open your inbox. Because if you open your inbox first, it’s basically like going over the door of the office, opening the door, and saying, “Come on in, squirrels! Take over,” right?

So, I want you to get into your time, your projects, and your tasks for a few minutes before opening your email so that you put that email into perspective. And then if the email fully takes over, it probably should. It probably is the most important thing. But if you’re not looking at your calendar and your projects and tasks first, how do you know? You’re just guessing.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Randall Dean

I would just say go out and check out my website, RandallDean.com, pretty easy. That’s Randall, R-A-N-D-A-L-L. And if you go out to RandallDean.com, I’m also on LinkedIn. I would say search “Randy Dean” to find me. And I have a popular and growing YouTube channel too, and I think you could just type in Randy Dean, email, and it’ll probably, something of mine’s going to pop up right near the top of the list, so, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Randall Dean

Rome wasn’t built in a day. Pick two, three, four pieces of low-hanging fruit, do those first, baby steps. You don’t have to become an expert overnight, but find those really good nuggets wherever you find them and try to integrate those right away, and then build your system from there.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Randy, this is fun. Thank you.

Randall Dean

Yeah, I had a good time.