Tag

Speaking & Presentations Archives - Page 9 of 13 - How to be Awesome at Your Job

299: How to Rock an Interview with Pamela Skillings

By | Podcasts | No Comments

 

 

Pam Skillings says: "There's so many things that you can achieve if you get good at interviewing."

Founder of Big Interview, Pam Skillings, breaks down what makes an interview successful and how to best up your interview game.

You’ll Learn:

  1. How to prepare without over preparing
  2. The best answers to the most commonly-occurring interview questions
  3. Your secret weapon for any interview

About Pam

Pamela Skillings is an author, entrepreneur, and career coach who  specializes in helping people find success and fulfillment in their dream careers. Her company, Skillful Communications, provides career coaching and training for individuals and training and development consulting for companies and organizations. Big Interview is her online job interview training system that helps clients ace their interviews and land big job offers.

She is also the author of Escape from Corporate America: A Practical Guide to Creating the Career of Your Dreams (Random House) and has been featured as a career expert by The New York Times, Newsweek, ABC News, and other media outlets . Additionally, she is an adjunct professor at New York University and a contributing columnist for About.com and other publications.

Items Mentioned in this Show:

Pam Skillings Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Pam, thank you so much for joining us here on the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.

Pam Skillings
Thanks for inviting me. I’m excited to chat today.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I’m excited too. I understand you also have some excitement and enthusiasm for a particular dinosaur. What’s the story here?

Pam Skillings
Well, I have a five-year-old. As you can imagine, that’s where my love of dinosaurs has come from. When you asked me for a fun fact, I thought not too many people are going to share that the diplodocus is their favorite dinosaur, but it was fresh in my mind because I had just been having a very in depth dinosaur conversation that very evening.

Pete Mockaitis
I don’t think I can summon an image of what a diplodocus is off the top of my head. I think of the pterodactyl, the tyrannosaurus, triceratops, but I’m drawing a blank here.

Pam Skillings
I’m trying to be a little bit different, you know? I think the main reason is because it’s a lot of fun to say. Diplodocus. I don’t know, something about it.

Pete Mockaitis
Does it have any noteworthy features or abilities?

Pam Skillings
It’s kind of brontosaurus like. It’s big and it’s an herbivore. It’s definitely in the top ten I think of all time dinosaurs.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s funny, we have a new baby at home. The shirt he wears most days has three dinosaurs on it and one of them might be a diplodocus. I’ll have to double check.

Pam Skillings
Yeah, you’ll have to see if you can find one. You’ve got to start them early with the diplodocus.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. That’s good. Well, I want to hear all about your brilliance when it comes to helping folks with interviews. It’s impressive to behold. You’ve been doing this for a good while now. How long?

Pam Skillings
I’ve been doing this – well, career coaching since 2005 I guess. Yeah, and focusing, not exclusively, but mostly on interviewing for the last several years if not more. I hate to – it makes me feel old when I think too hard about it, but yeah, for a good long time. I kind of found my niche for a lot of people.

I still do coaching on other career issues, but I think I started out focusing more so on career change and bigger sort of career issues, trying to figure out the next chapter of your career. I still help people with that.

But I found that along with that, a lot of people, their biggest challenge was once they figured out what they wanted to do next, “Okay, how do I get someone to give me that job?” Most people are not naturally good at interviewing. Even if they’re not terrible, they could be better. They tend to get nervous. It’s a nerve-racking kind of experience.

I found I kind of had a knack for helping people with it. I think maybe because earlier in my career I worked in – I’ve worked in both marketing and human resources before getting into coaching and falling in love with sort of helping people with their careers and finding work that they love.

For whatever reason, I found that I had a knack for sort of listening to people and helping them figure out how to present themselves and their accomplishments and their strengths in the way that was really going to resonate with the interviewers. It was really rewarding to me once I started working with people on that because you see results right away.

I love ongoing coaching because you help people overcome big problems, but it takes a lot of time. With interview coaching I tend to even in one session, sometimes I’ll get a call the next day, “Hey, it went great. I got the job offer.” It’s really a nice feeling. It’s really rewarding to help people who have a lot of great things going for them just to get over this one hurdle, to learn this one skill, to kind of look at themselves and their own experience in a different way.

It’s hard I think to look at yourselves objectively sometimes and think about “What do I want to emphasize? What do I want to bring out about myself for this particular opportunity?”

An interview is kind of a different interaction than anything else we do in I guess normal life. People sometimes haven’t had training or it’s just not something that they’re comfortable with, but with a little bit of training, a little bit of coaching you can see people make a huge, huge difference.

Getting good at interviewing is a major life improvement opportunity. You can get a better job. You can get a job that you love more, make a lot more money. There’s so many things that you can achieve if you get good at interviewing.

Pete Mockaitis
Absolutely. The stakes and the rewards are substantial, which is how you’ve been able to command a 500 dollar an hour rate for years upon years, so congrats to you fellow entrepreneur. That’s really cool.

I’d love to hear then a couple of the gems that you share during these coaching sessions that make people say, “Yeah, that was totally worth it.” I’ll get specific shortly, but for now I’d like to go wide open in terms of those nuggets you share that make people go, “Wow, yes. That was the thing.”

Pam Skillings
Yeah, I think there’s a couple things that are recurring themes. I think most people are terrible at the whole ‘tell me about yourself’ because it’s just an awkward hugely open-ended question. It’s so easy to get off on a tangent or to stumble.

That’s one I’ve seen make a huge difference, just spending  a little bit of time together kind of thinking about, “Okay, how do I want to open this interview?” You’re opening in an interview and almost always that first question is something along those lines, sort of open-ended ‘tell me about yourself,’ ‘walk me through your resume.’

I find just making improvements to that and how you open, because it’s kind of like how you position yourself with this person. What their first real impression of you? What do they focus on? Well, you kind of have some control over than in terms of what you emphasize and how you describe yourself in that ‘tell me about yourself.’

Now of course, you’ve got to cover the key facts on the resume, but there’s a lot of different ways that you can do that. I think that’s one of the things.

Just being able to give real objective feedback to people about how they’re coming across. I think it’s very difficult sometimes to know yourself and often in interviews, you don’t get real feedback. You might get a, “Well, we went another way,” or “Yeah, we really liked you, but-.” You rarely get told, “Hey, you could be doing this better and this could be-” so I think that’s part of it.

I use my time very effectively. I sit down with someone and I am 100% focused on them and hearing what their challenges are, hearing how they’re coming across. I do my homework before each session on their industry. At this point I’ve worked with people across a lot of different industries, different levels, and there are definitely some nuances and differences when it comes to different types of jobs.

I think that’s sort of where I add value in having done this a long time and having a pretty good understanding of where people go wrong and what hiring managers are looking for and being able to give advice on sort of all the steps along the way in the job search and interview process.

Pete Mockaitis
I’d love to dig into some of these matters then. When it comes to the ‘tell me about yourself’ or ‘walk me through your resume,’ what are some of the key do’s and don’ts there?

Pam Skillings
Well, I think one of the biggest ones is having a strategy. We have this three-part model that we recommend to people. It’s not the only way to do it, but sort of going in and knowing, like this is the chance to basically tell my whole story. I don’t know want to try to wing it and end up going off on a tangent or end up leading with the stuff that’s less relevant or interesting and losing the person after 20 seconds.

We have this three-part model. We have articles. We have lots of information and free advice on our blog, BigInterview.com/blog and Big Interview is our online training platform, so people who don’t have the budget or inclination to hire a coach to work one-on-one, we’ve put a lot of different lessons in terms of how I do things with my clients and there’s a practice tool and a bunch of stuff like that on Big interview.

‘Tell me about yourself’ is definitely one of the things that is most popular and that people are most likely to be looking for on our site. Really emphasizing what’s most relevant and interesting for this particular job.

I think a lot of people by instinct kind of walk in and start at the beginning of their story. It’s like “Well, I grew up here. I went to college here.” If you’re a ten-year seasoned executive, by the time you get to the stuff that I really care about in terms of are you the right person for this job, I’ve kind of checked out a little bit. That’s one of the things I see people doing.

I think one of the other things people do with the ‘tell me about yourself’ as well as the rest of the interview is they just don’t – I hate to say sell yourself because it sounds like not a very human thing to do, but the truth is that in a job interview, you really have to think about how do I sell them on the fact that I’m the best fit for this job. How do I really highlight my strengths, experience that I have that will make me great in this position.

A lot of people aren’t comfortable with that. Most of us are not taught how to do that. We’re taught actually that that’s obnoxious to say nice things about yourself or to be too forward or to brag, especially people who are introverts, who are a little more modest by nature. They kind of struggle with that.

Even if they’re trying to do it, even through, “I know I’m supposed to sell myself, so I’m going to try to say something here,” they don’t necessarily do it in the most effective way because it doesn’t feel comfortable. They hold back. It’s out of their comfort zone or they stumble.

I think being able to do the planning upfront in this sort of three-part model is a helpful way to do that. You really think about “What are my talking points here? What is my story?”

We’ll talk some more about this I’m sure, but storytelling I think is a huge sort of secret weapon in terms of job interviews because they can be sort of dry at times. I think if you can use storytelling techniques in interviewing, it really helps to connect with the interviewer and also just make you a much more memorable candidate.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, you talk about selling yourself. Could you provide maybe just a couple example sentences to orient us a bit like, “Oh no, that’s not going too far. That’s just right.”

Pam Skillings
Yeah. I think everyone has a certain comfort level. One of the things I tell people is, “Okay, you’re an introvert. You have a quiet personality. I’m not going to force you to memorize a script saying I am the greatest manager ever and I leave all the other candidates in the dust.” That’s not going to feel natural and that’s not going to make a great impression by going too far in that direction either.

I always talk to people about how to find a way to say it in their voice, way to talk about their accomplishments in their voice to make sure that the interviewer is hearing it and is suitably impressed, but without it feeling over the top for them.

That’s why practice I think is huge too for people who are a little bit uncomfortable with this idea of selling themselves because the first time you say it, even if it’s perfectly fine in terms of the language, it’s going to feel weird because you’re not used to talking that way.

But if you practice out loud a few times, then you tweak it a little bit, maybe you change a word here and there, and you just get more comfortable with the idea of speaking that way about yourself.

Some of the things I advise people to do if they’re feeling a little bit uncomfortable or having a hard time figuring out a way to do this in their own style is first of all think about factual statements that are impressive. You don’t have to say, “I’m the greatest ever. I’m fantastic. You should definitely hire me.” You can say, “I led a multimillion dollar project that we delivered two weeks ahead of deadline and got amazing feedback from the client.”

Yeah, you put a few adjectives in there. You give a little enthusiasm around it. But it’s basically just stating the facts of something that you accomplished. That’s one thing.

Another technique for people who struggle a little bit that I  – there are others too, but another one that I found people find useful is quoting someone else. If you’re having a hard time saying, “I’m a great manager,” you can say, “In my performance review I got great feedback from my manager about my ability to mentor.”

Then you’re quoting somebody else and that gives it – first of all it gives it maybe a little bit of an extra credibility boost in terms of the listeners but it also doesn’t feel so much like you’re bragging as that you’re just sharing what someone else told you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that. I’m curious then in terms of sort of the tone with which you deliver these factual sentences or these quotations from others. Do you have some pro tips on calibrating that nicely?

Pam Skillings
Yeah, I think – you mean in terms of vocal quality and things like that?

Pete Mockaitis
Mm-hm. I can imagine that you can do it raw in a sense of “I delivered a multi-million dollar result.” It’s like, “Oh my gosh, I hate you. Shut up. Get out now.”

Pam Skillings
Yes, yes.

Pete Mockaitis
What’s the best way to say it?

Pam Skillings
Yeah, well those are the two ends of the extreme. The one end of the extreme is the person who’s just fumbling about it and then there’s the person who memorized this script that they’re reciting and that sounds totally canned and totally phony.

The best way to do this, finding that perfect balance between preparing and not over preparing to the point where it doesn’t feel true or it’s not at all spontaneous. I’m a big believer in this idea of the bullet-point approach. It’s about thinking about what you’re key speaking points are for the most important questions.

There’s a core set of questions that I think are the most commonly asked as well as the ones that I think maybe have the biggest influence in terms of the overall impression that interviewers have of a particular candidate.

Especially if there’s an area that you’re sensitive about or if there’s a gap in your resume or something like that, questions around more awkward topics, sort of preparing some bullet points. You’re not scripting word for word but you’re sort of capturing a few bullet points that allows you to really focus on the most interesting, relevant things you have to say for that question.

I use the metaphor sometimes about celebrities going on a talk show, right? They’re going on a talk show and they’re not going to completely improvise, but they’re also not going to get up there and read from a script, but they’re going to have, well probably their publicist, but somebody’s going to prepare these speaking points for them.

They’re going to get up there and they’re going to make sure to mention that fun story about their co-worker on set. They’re going to make sure to mention this other interesting fact about their favorite hobbies. So thinking a little bit about the bullet points.

Then practicing. Again, I think sometimes people – practicing gets a bad reputation because people feel like, “Oh, well if you practice too much, it’s not going to be authentic. It’s not going to be natural.”

For me it’s the opposite. I’ve seen it time and time again with people because everybody knows you’re supposed to practice. Every interview book is like, “Well, you should practice.” But a lot of people are like, “Eh, yeah. But it’s awkward. It’s weird. I don’t know. I’m just going to say it in my head.”

But I see it time and again in sessions. People go from stumbling to sounding really polished and confident after practicing it a few times. It’s sort of like – because an interview is a performance to some degree. You’re starring as yourself, so hopefully you’re being authentic, but you’re also preparing. You want to make sure you’re prepared, just like when you give an important presentation. You’re being yourself, but you’re being the best version of yourself that you can be.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that. That analogy to the talk shows, it’s true with like the anecdotes. It just reminds me of – there’s this goofy TV show called Nathan for You.

Pam Skillings
Oh, I don’t know that one.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s so funny. It’s out there. This comedian studied all the anecdotes shared at talk shows and then crafted what would be the perfect anecdote for him to share at a talk show and then elaborately constructed the events to unfold so that he wasn’t technically lying. We can link to that in the show notes.

Pam Skillings
Yeah, that sounds hilarious.

Pete Mockaitis
When it comes to these questions that show up a lot and have a big impact in forming the impression of a candidate, could you share a few of those right here, right now?

Pam Skillings
Absolutely, absolutely. ‘Tell me about yourself’ definitely is one of the top ones. I’ve already sort of talked at length, perhaps too much length, about that one. That’s really important.

Every interview is going to ask you some form of ‘why are you interested in this job,’ why do you want to work here.’ There’s different angles on that: ‘why this company,’ ‘why this position,’ ‘why this career path,’ sort of depending on where you are in your career and whether you’re making a switch.

Really being able to speak at length in a non-generic way about why this is the perfect next opportunity for you is very important.

Strengths and weaknesses both are very important and also tend to come up and maybe there are different variations on how they are worded, but these are things that are frequently asked about.

Even the weakness, and I do think the weakness question is a bit of a cliché and probably not something where you’re going to get a ton of truthful information from someone. Everyone knows to expect it at this point I think or most people do, especially if they read my blog. But it is still asked a lot.

I keep waiting for it to go out of fashion and for people to stop asking it, but I keep asking my clients when they come in after a new interview, they’re like, “Yup, yup. They asked me. They definitely asked me.”

Strengths and weaknesses. I think strengths even more so because preparing for the weakness question is more a matter of limiting the downside, where because it’s an awkward question and if you’re not prepared you could blurt something out that’s weird or just not ideal versus the strengths question, which is another example of where you’re sort of being forced to sell yourself and say good things about yourself.

If you’re not prepared, a lot of times people lapse into this very generic, vague, laundry list of “I’m a people person. I’m detail oriented,” but just not taking full advantage of the opportunity basically to say, “Okay, here are the top three reasons why I would be awesome at this job.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, I like that. You gave a little bit of detail there. You have some bullets for top three and not being shy about doing the sales when it comes to the strengths side. What are some components for the why are you interested in this company or this role.

You say you want to be non-generic, so don’t, I guess, parrot back the information that’s on the website and say general things. But what are some sort of particular examples that really make that come to life?

Pam Skillings
Yeah, there’s a couple things. First of all, you definitely want to do your research on the company. I think most people know to do that. You want to show that you understand what the company does and there are things about the company that you like. Doing some research and fining some things about the company.

If you can go beyond what you read on a website and talk about, “Oh, I have a friend who worked there,” or you have some sort of information that you’ve gained.

But even if you’ve just read about the company, but you have a couple of specific details that you pulled about they won an award for innovation or they’re CEO did this interview in the journal that you thought was really insightful. Being able to talk about something specific if you can.

Then I think one of the things that people sometimes don’t do that I think makes the biggest difference with this kind of question is they think about the company, but they don’t really think specifically about the job itself. I think that’s really important here.

You do want to make sure that it’s clear you did the research on the company, you think the company’s a good fit for you. But when it comes down to it, your success in this position is going to depend on what you do every day, the job itself. Being able to talk about how this job description is made for me.

I’m being a little over the top in the language, but being able to point to, “Hey, these are the things you’re looking for. This is why I’m a great fit because I’ve done this and I’ve got this strength and I’ve got this training.”

Being able to really speak to the job description and both the fact that you are a great fit for that job description and also that you would be excited about doing the work, that this is the kind of work that you love to do and thus, you would be motivated to succeed if they hired you for the role.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s super, so not just “I thought it was cool that you won these awards,” which is like front and center on the homepage, but particulars associated with this will get you fired up to go forward and do that. I like it.

It’s interesting, it seems like that is really a theme here is that in each of these instances, it’s not so much a matter of directly answering precisely the facts requested of you so much so as telling the story of your talking points about why you are particularly wonderful for this opportunity.

Pam Skillings
Yeah, absolutely and thinking strategically about – and that’s why I think sometimes – some people are good at winging it and good stuff comes out.

I’ve had lots of clients who have said, “Yes, I do pretty well when I get a good interviewer and they ask good questions and we have a good rapport, but then I have these other situations where I walk in and I’m like the person’s not giving me anything or they’re asking really weird, vague questions.” And they just shut down or they start blurting things out.

I think the preparation that I work with people to do allows you to be proactive, allows you to kind of take control of the experience, so you’re not scripting, but you’re thinking, “Okay, I know that these are the key things I want to convey about myself in this interview, so if they ask the perfect question, great. If they don’t, I’m going to find ways to work in the fact that I have these great leadership skills and I’ve led an international team of 25-“

Thinking about these are the things that I want to make sure I’m able to communicate gives you a little bit of control. It can feel a lot like you’re at the mercy of the interviewer in a job interview and you somewhat are, I guess, but if you go in feeling comfortable with your speaking points and the things that you want them to remember about you, it gives you a little bit of that opportunity to be strategic and proactive about it.

Pete Mockaitis
Do you have any pro tips for doing a smart segue there in terms of they’re asking you a question and you’re delivering your speaking points.

I guess I’m chuckling and thinking about politicians now. They’re asked a question and they just say what they want to say regardless of the question that is posed to them. I’d say, if I were an interviewer, that would make me angry. It’s like, “Okay, either you are not listening to me or you’re dumb, or you are sort of determined to railroad this in the way you like.” Whatever the interpretation, I don’t like it. What are some of your pro tips for making a smooth connection between the question and your talking point?

Pam Skillings
Yeah, I agree. I think you don’t want to completely ignore the question and basically just say what you feel like saying. I think that’s definitely not going to serve you well.

I always say you do want to answer the question. You don’t want to just sort of jam your speaking points in there regardless of what they asked. You’re looking for questions that legitimately provide an opening for what you want to say. Usually there are. Usually there are some open-ended questions where you get an opportunity to talk about what you want to talk about.

I do think you do want to answer the questions that are asked though. I definitely see some advice out there about “Seize control of the interview. Turn the question back on them.” I have heard many stories about how that has backfired. I would not advise it.

Pete Mockaitis
What are your strengths?

Pam Skillings
How do you feel about this position? Yeah, so you can ask questions and they’ll probably prompt you to ask question at some point in the interview, but there’s also a certain matter of respect to answer the questions that are asked.

This is their job. Their job is to hire someone great for this role. They’re not just trying to torture you. Some people are better interviewers than others, some are not great. But this is serious for them. They have to pick someone.

It’s a big risk factor. If they hire someone who doesn’t work out, it’s going to make them look bad. It might influence their bonus and promotion possibilities. You kind of have to think about their perspective too.

That’s one of the things I always talk about with people. Why are they asking a certain question? It’s not just because they want to be difficult, but thinking about where is it that they’re coming from and how you can address what their concerns are and what they feel they need to know about you.

Pete Mockaitis
I’d love to hear, you talked a lot about getting really specific about what you’re talking points are and what’s special about you and getting those out there and the research.

Can we zoom out a little bit to talk about some universals in terms of “Hey, no matter what your talking points are, no matter what the industry or the role, these are some things that always go over well in interviews, so be sure to do them or something that always don’t go over so well, so be sure not to do them.”

Pam Skillings
I love these questions. You don’t want to generalize too much, but there definitely are some things that you see time and time again.

I think one of the things that goes across almost all interviews, I would say all interviews, in addition to the ‘tell me about yourself’ thing and being able to talk about your strengths, but one of the things that’s really important that I think some people either don’t think about or they just have difficulty doing is really showing your sincere enthusiasm for the position.

I always use the analogy of dating with people. I always say, “Hopefully your dates are more fun than your job interviews.” As much as I think job interviews are important, there is a difference. But it’s about making it clear that you’re happy to be there and that you find the opportunity really interesting. You have enthusiasm. You’d be motivated to succeed if they hired you.

That’s why I think that question of “Why are you interested in this opportunity? Why are you interested in this company? What are you looking to do next?” they’re really trying to get a feel for what you care about, how this position fits into your career goals and into what you love to do, and trying to get a feel for whether you would be a passionate, strong performer if you were hired. I think that’s one thing that cuts across all types of interviews.

Some people struggle ether because they have a very low key personality. One sort of sub-group of my coaching clients over the years are people who have a very sort of poker-faced, low key kind of demeanor and they miss out on opportunities.

They’re getting feedback, “Well you just didn’t seem that interested. It didn’t seem like you were that excited about the opportunity.” They’re like, “I really was, but I’m just not someone who goes in there and says, “This is the greatest job ever.’”

We work on ways to bring out their personality and their enthusiasm a little bit in a way that still feels like them and practice helps with that too because they can see – on Big Interview we have a video practice interview tool. I also video record the mock interviews I do with coaching clients.

So they can see themselves on video and they can see that sometimes if you have a very low-key personality, every little bit of smiling or hand gestures feels, “Oh, that’s over the top,” but then you see it on video and you realize, “Okay, well, that isn’t as weird as it feels to me. I just have to kind of get used to it.” I think that helps with that particular issue as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, yeah. That’s good. The enthusiasm is one universal. What else?

Pam Skillings
Let’s see, what else is a universal? I think asking smart questions is definitely a universal and preparing some questions to ask at the end of the interview that are smart, they show you’ve done your homework, not like, “So what does this company do anyway?” But also that focus on your ability to do a good job, so not vacation days and things like that.

But “What do you think are the biggest opportunities for the department this year? What are some of the most interesting projects that are happening at the company right now?” Questions that show your interest in the work and the company and the team and show that you’re already thinking about how can I contribute, how can I get involved in this. Asking smart questions I think is definitely a universal.

Another universal and we can go into more detail about this or not is I think the behavioral questions, being able to tell good stories about your greatest accomplishments because you’re going to get those behavioral questions in most interviews, ‘tell me about a time,’ ‘give me an example.’

Even if you don’t get those formally behavioral questions, having stories of your greatest hits, I call them your greatest hits stories, sort of having some stories prepared in a nice, concise way that kind of help to show, “Hey, here are some of the cool things that I’ve done that demonstrate my ability to do the work that’s required in this position.”

Pete Mockaitis
Mm-hm. I’d love to get your take, yes, when it comes to what makes a story great. How do we think about that in terms of I guess length or components or how do we story tell well?

Pam Skillings
Well, I think in an interview there are some similarities to telling a great story at a party and a story in an interview, although I’m sure the interview ones are maybe not quite as amusing as stories you might tell in other areas of your life. But there definitely are similarities.

You want to have a little bit of a story arc. You want to paint a picture and you want to make sure that you’re really sharing what you in particular did to contribute to the project or the situation instead of falling back on the generic ‘we.’

I think this might come from people who are a little bit more on the modest side. Instead of saying, “I did this,” or, “I came up with the solution,” it’s, “Well, we, we, we.”

I always use, I think it’s a tried and true approach until they come up with something better, the STAR format. I don’t know if you’re familiar with that from your career, but there’s something called the STAR format that you might see in career books in college career centers. I share it with students sometimes. I think it originated out of management consulting as a way to evaluate these behavioral stories.

The idea is that each answer should form a complete star. I take it a little bit loosely. The ST is supposed to stand for situation task. For me it’s like not necessarily situation or task, but it’s a little bit of backstory. Here’s the context. Here’s why this project was important. Here’s just enough background so that you can understand what happens. Not a whole history of the entire project, just enough to set things up.

The A is kind of the meat of the story. It’s approach or actions. Then you walk through just a couple bullet points. This is where it can get difficult. Sometimes you’re telling a story of a multi-month or even year project, so you’ve got to think about “Okay, what are the highlights here? What are the key things I want to talk about?”

Of course, being prepared to give more information if there are more follow up questions, they want more detail on certain things. Having a couple of those bullet points about what happened, here are some obstacles that came up, here’s how we address them, here’s some other things that I did.

Then all of that leading up to the R, the happy ending. Every good story has a happy ending. The result. Having some sort of positive outcome. This could be a concrete result and often that’s very effective being able to say, “We saved the company a million dollars,” or, “We increased revenue by 8%,” or whatever, but sometimes it can even be anecdotal. “I got great feedback. Everyone was really happy with the project. We got in under budget, under deadline,” etcetera.

Having a positive outcome that you can speak to, that gives it a nice story arc, a little bit of a hero’s journey from the beginning to the positive outcome.

Pete Mockaitis
So in sharing this story, it’s interesting. I think that in many ways you could complete a full STAR in one minute or ten minutes. What are your thoughts in terms of about how long is the right amount of length?

Pam Skillings
My go-to advice is for any answer, one to two minutes is a sweet spot. Two minutes is stretching it a little bit. There are some differences in terms of types of interviews. There are some types of panel interviews that are fully behavioral and they have a little bit more leeway for the stories to be a little bit longer.

There are some exceptions here and there, but I think after two minutes you’re going to start losing people even if your content is good. I think it’s just attention span, monologue versus dialogue. I think you’re trying to come up with a story that’s in that one to two minute range.

Then of course, being prepared and hoping by the way you tell your story that you’ve given them some interesting things that they might want to dig more deeply into. Then of course you can give that additional detail.

But I think one of the things people struggle with is being able to focus it down to something that’s concise and engaging and still making sure that they’re giving me enough information to show why this was a big success.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Any other thoughts when it comes to body language or vocal pauses or how we’re presenting ourselves?

Pam Skillings
Yes, this is a big one. I think so many people come in after their first session and one of their biggest questions is, “Okay, well, how is my body language? Was I doing anything weird?” The answer is almost always, “Well, yes.” Because we all do. I do it too.

When we’re not focused on body language or we’re not 100% sure of what we’re talking about sometimes, we all fall back on things like um’s and ah’s, and fidgeting. I like to fidget with my hands. Everybody has different things that they do. I’ve had people who twirl in the seat, who play with their hair, who have the key phrase ‘like, you know,’ repeat ‘like, you know’ after every line. Most people are not hugely dramatic, but everybody has those little tells.

One of the things I tell people is that the practice, as tedious as it may sound to you, but preparing so that you feel good about what your key points are going to be and how you want to describe things in sort of a general way, not memorize word for word, but having done enough preparation and then practicing, doing a couple practice interviews. It goes a long way in removing those things.

I could tell you, if you look at some of the video recordings of people, their first practice interview and their first session or a new user on Big Interview, they record their first practice interview versus later on after they’ve kind of worked through some things and practiced a few times. It’s a huge difference. Almost always those little body language things go away.

Yeah, sometimes I do have to direct people’s attention to it because they’re not even sure that they’re doing it. But I usually tell people at the beginning, “Don’t overthink the body language thing yet. Let’s think about what you want to say. Let’s dig into that.” Then try it a few times and almost always I see it naturally either at least significantly reduced, if not go away completely.

Of course, you don’t have to be perfect. Even the best public speakers that get up on stage in front of hundreds of people, you’ll catch them in an um or an uh here and there I’m pretty sure.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s interesting. Most of the time you’re saying when you see weird body language that is largely due to just folks being unprepared and doing what their bodies do when they’re I guess feeling nervous or not rearing to go.

Pam Skillings
Nervousness and I think the other things is when you’re distracted by trying to think of what you want to say, you fall back on – you’re not even aware you’re doing that. That’s when people do things like stare down at the table or stare up at the ceiling or start fidgeting with the pen because they’re not even aware they’re doing it because they are nervous and most people are at least a little bit nervous in an interview.

Then they’re just distracted by – in their head they’re so caught up with, “Okay, well I could say this, but I’m not really sure. What did he mean by that?” or, “Oh, why’s he looking over there? I think he hates me,” all this stuff that’s going through your brain. If you’ve prepared in the way that I’ve tried to get people to prepare, there’s a lot less of that noise happening in your head.

You’re occasionally still going to get a curveball and you’re still probably going to have some nervousness here and there, but there’s a lot less of that.

There are some people who are just not as comfortable face to face, where we have to do a little bit more work. Maybe they haven’t had a lot of experience having to sit down and present and speak to people face to face, so there are people who need a little bit more sort of extra work and guidance, but for most people I think a lot of that gets smoothed out with the preparation and the practice.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. Tell me, Pam, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we shift gears and hear about some of your favorite things.

Pam Skillings
One thing sometimes people are surprised to hear and you mentioned in your last question things to do that are more universal and also things not to do that are universal.

I think one of the things not to do that a lot of people do is at the end I said it’s great, ask smart questions. There’s some advice floating around somewhere out there that says, “Ask a question like, ‘Is there anything about me that you have concerns about in terms of this position?’” There’s variations on that. Basically, getting the interviewer to tell you what objections do you have to me.

I think it’s a bad idea. I see where it came from. I think it came from sales because when you’re a salesperson this idea of surfacing objections so that you can address them makes perfect sense. “Well, why don’t you want to buy this product?” Well if they say it’s pricing, I have my thing I can say about pricing. But it’s just a very different situation in a job interview for a couple of reasons.

One is that most HR people and managers and especially at big companies, they’ve been trained not to give feedback like that on the spot. Sometimes they just don’t have that feedback on the spot. They need to take it in. They need to process. They’ve got other candidates.

You’re putting them in an awkward potion. I’ve so many HR people and hiring managers who have said that’s their least favorite question because it puts them on the spot, it’s awkward.

I think that ties into this whole idea of – I’m sure you’ve heard about there’s studies but there about sort of the peak end experience and how influential the end of an experience is in terms of how you remember it.

I think asking a question like this at the very end of the interview is just a perfect set up to say, “Okay, now think about everything negative you can imagine about me right at the end.” I think it doesn’t do people any favor to ask a question like that.

I think you could flip it and ask in a more positive way, something more like, “What do you think are the most important qualities for someone in this role?” something like that because that might get them talking a little bit about qualities that maybe you haven’t had a chance to talk about or give you an opening to talk about your experience in a different way.

The whole setup to critique me at the end of an interview is not a good way to go.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s interesting because I can hear how folks would very much want to say, “Is there anything else? I want to make sure I nail that for you,” so you can accomplish that by asking it differently, so that’s good.

I guess you – if you’re at the phase of the interview toward the end, which you’re asking the questions, it might seem a little off to say, “Oh, what are the most critical things?” “Oh, well, by the way, I totally have all of those.” What’s the next step do you think?

Pam Skillings
Well, yeah, I think you look for a way to naturally bring it up if you can. If they say, “The most important thing here is we’re looking for someone who’s an innovator,” and then being able to say, “Oh, that’s great. I thought so based on the job description and I think that that’s something that’s a great fit for my background because of the innovation that I’ve done at blah, blah, blah.”

I think trying to make a natural segue as opposed to, “Oh, oh, oh, that’s me. That’s me. That’s me.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, cool. Thank you. Now can you share with us a favorite quote, something that inspires you?

Pam Skillings
Yeah, I looked up – I was thinking about something that would be interesting. Sorry, I have to scroll down because I have all these quotes saved in my files. This is a Picasso quote that I like which is, “I am always doing that which I cannot do in order that I may learn how to do it.”

That one just stuck with me in general because so many times I found new things that I loved to do, that I’m good at doing by pushing myself out of the comfort zone even though earlier I thought, I could never do that. That sounds horrible. That sounds way beyond my capabilities.

I think that’s interesting. A lot of research backs up the fact that just the practice, the doing it, of putting yourself out there, may be you won’t be Picasso, but it’s a way of learning and a way of pushing yourself.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. How about a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Pam Skillings
I think for me all the interesting research that’s out there about storytelling I find just fascinating. To try to pick one is difficult, but all the work that’s out there about how much more memorable you are when you give your information in the form of a story and how much more the person listening to you connects with you.

It ties into all this stuff about interviewing in terms of telling your behavioral stories because it’s true. If you talk about your strengths in a more generic way, that’s all well and good, but if you tell a story, you’re inviting the person to imagine you, to picture you, and to really feel like, “Yeah, I have a sense of how that person works. I could see myself working with this person. I can see how this person approaches a problem.”

A lot of really interesting research on storytelling and the power of storytelling. I nerd out with all of those medi-books and studies that are you there on the different aspects of that.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh great. Thank you. How about a favorite book?

Pam Skillings
A couple that I’ve been thinking about that apply to my work and I read a lot. I read a lot of fiction as well. But Daniel Pink’s Drive is something that has really resonated with me. Just thinking about as a coach, as someone who’s trying to teach and motivate people and even motivating a small child has a lot of really interesting insights about what motivates people and why people do what they do.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. How about a favorite tool, something that helps you be awesome at your job?

Pam Skillings
Well, one thing, thinking about an app or – Zoom is something that I use with my clients and it’s something for anyone who is having meeting and Skype is lovely too, but Zoom is a similar video conferencing tool. I have all of my video coaching sessions with Zoom so that’s something that I use every day.

I just feel, yes, phone coaching can be great too, but there’s something about having someone – being able to see someone, having them be able to see you, and also being able to record everything so that they can go back and review their practice interview, review the advice, brainstorm so that I would say is something that has really helped make my life and my work much more efficient and effective.

Pete Mockaitis
I love Zoom as well and I’d love to get your professional take, do you believe Zoom has superior audio quality over Skype?

Pam Skillings
I think so and certainly in terms of reliability. I think that’s one of the things, aside from the video component and the ability to record in a reliable way, I find that the sound fades out and does weird things less often.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, thank you.

Pam Skillings
How about you? What’s your take on that?

Pete Mockaitis
I think that the video quality is better with Zoom. I think it’s an interface I enjoy using more. I find that I guess – I’m on the fence right now in terms of should I jump on over and use Zoom for my podcast interviews. I certainly love it with coaching environments. I’m still deciding.

Pam Skillings
Yeah, let me know how you go because I haven’t used it a lot for sort of recording things that are being shared with lots of people like a podcast would be, but more for individual’s use, so yeah, I would be curious to see what your experience is if you test that out.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, certainly. Can do. Do you have a particular nugget that you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks?

Pam Skillings
I think on the subject of interviewing, I think one of the things that resonates with people, this idea that interviewing is a skill. You get people who feel like, “Well, I’m bad at interviewing,” or interviewing is awful and interviewing is something that you’re either good at or you’re not good at. It absolutely is a skill.

I’ve had people who were objectively terrible and getting that feedback, were bad enough that people were saying, “You really need to work on your interviewing.” That’s how people find me sometimes.

It really is a skill like a lot of things that you can work on. There are actionable steps that you can take. I think that’s something that makes people feel a lot better. “Okay, I’m a quick study. I’m someone – if you tell me what I need to do and walk me through the steps, I can do it.”

If interviewing is one of the things that’s in the way between you and your dream job, it doesn’t have to be. You can definitely improve your skills no matter what level you’re at the moment.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool, thank you. If folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Pam Skillings
BigInterview.com is our site. That’s where we have all of our information. I do coach people one on one. BigInterview.com is our self-guided learning platform where people can check out video lessons, the practice tool, all kinds of things like that.

Our blog has tons of free information, lots of articles on things like that, three-part model, and how to approach behavioral. I’ve got all kinds of articles about all the different pieces of the interview process. If anyone is interested in learning more, that’s probably the best place.

Pete Mockaitis
Excellent. Do you have a final challenge or call to action you’d issue to folks seeking to be awesome at their jobs?

Pam Skillings
Well, this is something that goes beyond interviewing. It’s something I’ve been saying for a while, which is I really feel like people should look at managing their career the way that they would run a business.

Really being proactive and being a good interviewer is part of that, being able to speak about your strengths and your experience, being able to connect with people, to find opportunities, but thinking about it in a very entrepreneurial way as opposed to sort of letting your career happen to you.

I’m sure that’s something that the people who listen to this podcast already are kind of thinking along those lines, but I think it’s important. You never want to be powerless and at the mercy of other people. You want to always be improving yourself, learning new skills, developing yourself, and positioning yourself for the next opportunity, whether it’s your current job or somewhere else.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, Pam, thank you so much for taking this time and sharing these perspectives. I wish you and Big Interview and all you’re up to lots of luck.

Pam Skillings
Thanks so much and you too.

295: The Value of Awkwardness with Melissa Dahl

By | Podcasts | No Comments

 

 

Melissa Dahl says: "The ridiculous in me honors the ridiculous in you."

Melissa Dahl discusses embracing awkward moments and turning them into valuable learning experiences.

You’ll Learn:

  1. When self-consciousness can be helpful
  2. A quick exercise to instantly make you feel less self-conscious
  3. How to effectively navigate an awkward conversation

About Melissa

Melissa Dahl is a senior editor at New York Magazine’s The Cut, where she leads the health and psychology coverage. In 2014, she helped launch Science of Us, NYMag’s popular social science website. Her writing interests include personality, emotions, and mental health. Outside of New York Magazine, Melissa’s byline has appeared in Elle, Parents, and the New York Times.

Items Mentioned in this Show:

Melissa Dahl Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Melissa, thanks so much for joining us here at the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, thanks for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I think we’re going to have a whole lot of fun in this conversation. I think we both had our fair share of awkward moments. Could you tell us a little bit about a time you once ran into a light pole?

Melissa Dahl
Oh my gosh, you heard about that too. Yeah, okay.

This happened a few years ago. I am very much not a morning person, but sometimes I kind of like to pretend to be one. I was meeting my friend, Marie, for like a 6 AM jog on the East River. We had just started and I do not know how it happened, but I like ran straight into a pole, like a light pole. To this day I have no idea how it happened.

I write about this in the book and how you’re instinct when these sorts of things happen is to just play it off and say, “Oh, I’m fine. I’m fine. It was fine,” even if you’re like really, really hurt.

The funny – we can kind of get into this later I guess, but the funny thing about that was I didn’t tell my friend Marie I was putting that in the book. When she got to it because I gave her an early copy, she was like, “Oh, I mean I kind of remember that, but I don’t remember it in this much detail,” so yeah, it didn’t have as much of an impact on her as it did on me.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. I guess emotionally in the memory and physically.

Melissa Dahl
Physically. Oh my gosh.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh mercy. Yes, that is an illustration of an important principle that we’re going to get to. But maybe you can orient us first and foremost, so your book, Cringe Worthy, what’s it all about?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, so the book is about – so I am a senior editor at The Cut, where I cover – which is a New York magazine website. I cover health and psychology there. I’ve written about psychology for a long time. I’m really interested in emotions, kind of relationships, how we understand ourselves, how we understand each other.

This book is sort of an outgrowth of that I wanted to understand the feeling of awkwardness, which is something that, I don’t know about you, but I feel a lot.

What I’ve always really liked about my job is it’s like almost like highbrow self-help. I’m reading these academic studies and there’s some kind of just nugget in there of “Oh, I could apply this to my life and it’s going to make me better at this or it’s going to make relationships go more smoothly,” or something like that.  I just kind of couldn’t find anything that applied to awkwardness.

That’s what the book kind of is, just me trying to understand this feeling and what the purpose of it might be. I actually have to tell you, it started as a book about how to avoid awkwardness, how to kind of overcome it and protect from ever feeling this way. By the end, I kind of came to really like this weird little emotion.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s cool. First of all, for those who are curious or intrigued, what’s there to like about it Melissa?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, a few things l think. One of the things is – the subtitle of the book is A Theory of Awkwardness. My sort of major theory is I think that awkward moments happen when the version of yourself you’re trying to present to the world is shown to be incompatible with reality in some way.

I would like to present to the world that I am not the kind of person who runs into lamp poles and then I do. Or a good recent example of this is at the Winter Olympics a couple of months ago, there was this picture that went around of a – I think she was a Russian athlete – wearing a shirt that said something like, ‘I don’t do doping,’ or something like that. Then it turned out she failed a drug test.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, bugger.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah. I remember someone at my job put that into the chat and just wrote ‘awkward’ on it.

I think it kind of shows you that there’s a gap sometimes between the version of yourself you’re trying to present to the world and the version of yourself the world is actually kind of seeing.

If that’s true, then I think one good thing about these kinds of moments is that it kind of maybe shows us some places where we need improvement if we’re open to it. It’s going to show us some places where we can grow. That’s sort of my main theory of awkwardness.

But the other aspect of it is that I came to really love is these moments feel isolating, it feels like you’re the only one who just feels like an embarrassing idiot, but of course we all feel this way. If we are a little more open about it, it’s a way to kind of connect with people.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh that is good. Well, I want to follow up on a couple of those points there. First you say that the awkwardness happens when there’s a mismatch between sort of your self-perception or the version of yourself that you have in mind versus what is picked up by others.

Would you say that this is a mismatch in sort of the net disappointing direction, like, “I think of myself as someone who doesn’t dope and yet, here I am being found out as someone as dopes,” but can it happen in the opposite as well, like, “I think of myself as just sort of like a normal guy, but then people are telling me that I’m a genius.” Does that also feel awkward?

Melissa Dahl
I actually sort of think – I think we certainly think of it more in the negative direction. If you think you were having a pretty good hair day and then you see a picture of yourself and you’re like, “Oh my gosh, actually my hair was super greasy or something like that.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, and no one told me. That’s happened before. It’s like, “We were talking for more than an hour, you didn’t think that this worth a mention?”

Melissa Dahl
Exactly. I think it’s typically in that direction. I don’t know.

I sometimes think it might be – I think we feel weird whenever – I think we feel unsettled a little bit whenever we realize the self you’re trying to present to the world is not the way other people are seeing you.

There’s a story I read about in a book. It’s anthropologist story from the late ‘60s. He went to this tribe in Papua New Guinea. He had reason to believe that these folks had never seen their reflections, that they’d never seen a photographic image of themselves. They’ve never seen themselves in a mirror.

He kind of came and his arrival changed all that. He brought mirrors, he brought Polaroid cameras, he brought tape recorders. As he writes it – he wrote this report about it later – they all just kind of cowered and kind of just like clenched their stomachs, and kind of gritted their teeth. I think you could say they cringed. They cringed at the way they looked, at the way they sounded.

I’m not sure we can say they all thought like, “Oh, I’m uglier than I thought,” but just like oh, there’s just something existentially weird about thinking there is the you that exists in your own head and there’s the you running around out there who other people actually see and that those are often the same, but sometimes they’re not. Yeah, I think that’s kind of a part of it.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s true I guess. It would be unusual if all of those villagers were disappointed.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Because I guess some of them would probably be surprised like, “Oh, I’ve got some good muscles.”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s paying off all that work I’ve been doing.

Melissa Dahl
Absolutely. Yeah. Yeah, I just think there’s something strange about the fact – confronting the fact that – I don’t know, you don’t just exist in your head that other people see you maybe a little differently than you see yourself. It’s just a little strange to reckon with even if it is in a positive direction.

Pete Mockaitis
It is strange to reckon with. One thing I find strange to have a hard time reckoning with is when you’re in the midst of a situation and someone actually explicitly says the word, “Awkward.”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
What’s up with that? Any research insights on that one?

Melissa Dahl
Oh my gosh, I know. That was such a thing when I was in college. Oh my gosh.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m glad it’s died down a little bit. I don’t hear it as much anymore.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, I know. I feel like it’s kind of migrated to people like my mother now says it a lot, although she might just say it because I wrote this book.

I think that term kind of has become kind of a cliché and almost kind of annoying. But I think that it’s – what it was supposed to be, what it was intended for actually helped a lot. I think there’s something about calling attention to the awkwardness of a situation, but if you do it right, it can kind of diffuse it.

Your listeners want to be awesome at work, there’s a lot of awkward situations at work. You maybe have to give someone feedback and you don’t know how to say it or maybe you have to tell someone they didn’t get this promotion they put in for.

I think sometimes it can help kind of cushion the blow a little bit or make it a little bit less uncomfortable if you just kind of acknowledge this is going to be a little hard to hear, this is going to be a little uncomfortable, maybe even this is going to be a little awkward. I think that’s where it came from a good place, but the awkward thing worked into something very annoying, so don’t do that.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s true. I like that because I think if you just sort of declare in advance, “Hey, this is what’s going on,” that really can be helpful as opposed to just saying, “Awkward.” It’s like, “Ah, shut up.”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, don’t do that. That’s annoying, but the impulse makes sense. I think the impulse is a good one, so kind of digging that out of the annoying

Pete Mockaitis
That is good. Thank you. I also want to hear a little bit about the awkwardness vortex turn of a phrase. What does this mean?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, so this is something I discovered in the research. There is all this psychological research linking nervousness and self-consciousness. Basically if you are nervous, you become more self-conscious. If you are self-conscious, you become nervous. The two kind of exacerbate each other and it goes round and round and round. I called this the awkwardness vortex.

It’s the kind of thing where if you’re going in for a job interview and you sit down and suddenly you can’t remember like, “Wait, what am I supposed to do with my legs? Should I cross my legs? Should I cross them to the side? Should I go to the other side? Should I just not cross them? What should I do?”

You’re nervous, so you’re kind of like zeroing in on your body, like “What am I doing? What is my arm doing?” Then focusing in on yourself makes you more nervous and it just goes around and around and around. Yeah, that is the awkwardness vortex.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, yeah. That’s intriguing. Can you give us a couple more examples of how that can play out and sort of if you find yourself emerging or beginning to enter that, how do you escape?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, well another example because it’s kind of a pop culture example, but – it’s like a silly example – but it’s in one of the Austin Powers’ movies. I think it’s like the third one, which is not a good movie. But there’s a part where there’s like a spy or a character or something who has a really big mole on his face.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh yes.

Melissa Dahl
And Austin is trying to say anything but calling attention to the mole. Then it just kind of comes out, like, “Oh mole, mole.” It’s a funny scene.

But I think that sort of could be applicable here. If you’re trying so hard not to offend somebody, but then all you can think about is what you’re saying, what you’re doing, and how that might offending them, and then that’s making you nervous you’re going to offend them. It’s just that link between nervousness and self-consciousness is a really established thing in the literature.

The good thing is because it’s so established, the folks who study this say that there is a pretty clear way out, which is if self-consciousness is part of the thing that triggers this, the way out of the awkwardness vortex is to focus on anything but yourself. Just focus on trying to get to know the person in front of you.

To go back to the job interview example, maybe do some work beforehand and think like, “Okay, these are the three things about myself I’m going to get across in this interview.” Just focusing on anything but yourself, calling attention to the weather, calling attention to, I don’t know, some third party thing, that should help.

Pete Mockaitis
That is good. That notion of fixating on what not to say causing problems just reminds me of a scene in The Simpsons where Principal Skinner is addressing the student body. He doesn’t know what to say regarding girls and math. He’s just trying so hard not to say the wrong thing and he just breaks down and says, “Tell me what you want me to say.”

Melissa Dahl
Oh my gosh, yeah. I think that – this is kind of a lot what I was writing about. The book is kind of aimed at people who are acting in good faith, who don’t – that chapter about the awkwardness vortex is people who don’t want to offend someone, not in a politically correct way, but just don’t want to be offensive. They’re people who want to be kind and make other people feel respected and welcome.

Sometimes I think focusing so hard on that, it just causes us to clam up and get more nervous and get more self-conscious. Part of this is kind of just taking a few steps back and not doing in so hard on yourself. It really helps.

Pete Mockaitis
You say we have good reason to feel less self-conscious. Can you unpack that a little bit, if you’ve got a handy exercise?

Melissa Dahl
Well, a really interesting thing about self-consciousness that the psychologists who study this say that it doesn’t exist to torture you. The point of self-consciousness is to help you learn.

A baseball player or something who is working on his swing he has to be – or someone who’s learning to play a sport like tennis or something like that. That’s maybe a better analogy. You are being pretty self-consciousness. You’re zeroing in on your actions, on your body, and that’s a good thing. That’s what you have to do to learn.

That’s actually helped me too to talk about kind of why we feel self-conscious. It’s there to torture me. It’s there for a purpose.

But that said, ways to not let it completely run your life, one of them is the focusing on other people. Then the other thing is just realizing that nobody else is as self-conscious of yourself as you are.

No one else is as focused on you as you are, which I know we all know in our heads, but you forget that when you’ve done something really silly. You think everyone’s looking, everyone’s – like the example with the lamp post. My friend didn’t even really remember that. She kind of did, but not really.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. Now you suggest an exercise right in terms of really kind of checking that out with a best friend with regard to your awkward or embarrassing memories.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
So can you unpack that a bit?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, it’s kind of the same thing. It’s the opposite version of my friend Marie not remembering me crashing into a lamp post.

We’ve been friends for a long time and I kind of can’t – I’m trying to call to mind something embarrassing she’s done. She’s someone I see all the time. I know I’ve seen her do something or say something embarrassing, but I really can’t remember anything. Now I’m trying to think of my college best friend, like I’m sure I’ve seen her do a million dumb things. We’ve been friends for a really long time.

To me that’s a good exercise. Your brain will come up with some things if they’re funny stories or if you’ve repeated them a lot, but I think for the most part it’s pretty hard to remember something that – I don’t know, something dumb your coworker said last week that she might be still really punishing herself over, like, “Oh, I can’t believe I made that stupid joke in the meeting. I’m such an idiot.” I can’t remember any of that.

Yeah, trying to put yourself in someone else’s shoes and trying to call to mind an embarrassing thing someone else has done is a pretty good exercise.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s awesome. Thank you. Now I’m curious, if we are going to enter into some territory that sounds like it could be awkward, you mentioned one pro tip is just sort of kind of setting the stage of the context and admitting what’s there, calling a spade a spade. Do you have any other perspectives on what is the optimal way to go forward into a conversation you perceive as likely to be awkward?

Melissa Dahl
Okay, so I have a chapter in my book about awkwardness at work. One kind of like underrated awkward thing at work is friendships. We work with people but we’re also friends with them. We’re kind of playing these two roles with them.

I don’t about you, but I’ve certainly been in plenty of situations where I’m friends with my co-worker but also she is not pulling her weight. I don’t know what to do. I feel like I need to – I don’t know how to have that conversation.

Or something like – this is a real thing that happened to a friend of mine. Her coworker just disappears to go to the gym for a couple hours in the afternoon and she has to cover for the coworker and it’s really starting to make her mad. I think work friendships is a place where it can be pretty awkward.

Talking about how to deal with it. I think one thing that helps – I think sometimes awkwardness can come from a feeling of uncertainty. I don’t know what to say next. I don’t know what to do next. That’s such a common thing when you’re feeling awkward.

To use this example of a problem with a friend at work, the best thing you can do to cut through that discomfort I think is just to be as direct as possible, just as straightforward as possible, which can feel uncomfortable, but it’s actually I think the kindest thing to do. You can say it in a kind way, but it’s better to just say it to your friend that “You’re doing this. It makes me feel this way and you’ve got to knock it off.”

I think that straightforwardness and directness can help cut through some of the awkwardness actually. I think we think that the answer is to kind of dance around a subject and like, “Oh, I can’t say that. I can’t say that directly. I can’t bring up this problem,” but I think it would be better if we all got up the guts to be a little bit more straightforward.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s funny. I think you’re dead on and it makes it more awkward when you’re dancing around it.

I remember one time I was coordinating this youth leadership seminar. It so happened that there was another group in the same facilities that I was familiar with. There was this dude who was like a hero to me that I had heard of from afar. I read his book. It was like, “Oh my gosh, that is Curtis Martin,” which means nothing to most people, but for me it was like well that guy is a big deal.

He’s in the room. Actually, me and my staff we all need to get in this room and sort of set things up because we’re going to have a bunch of students coming through here soon. I was like, “Oh my gosh, how do I boot almighty Curtis Martin out of this room.”

I remember I went in there. I felt super awkward. I was like, “Oh hi, so we – hi, I’m Pete and I’m a big fan. We have also a need-“ He was like, “Oh, you need the room?” I was like, “Yes, please.”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
It was merciful that he directly said what was there. I think that’s a good move. I guess there’s a fear associated with going there like they’ll be offended or they’ll lash back, or sort of terribly negative things will unfold if we say what we really think.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, but I think there’s a way to do it with kindness and I think that sometimes the simplest way is the best way to do it. Yeah, I think you kind of have to either – you either have to have the awkward conversation, you have to kind of be straightforward with the person or you just have to live with the thing that’s bothering if it’s a work situation especially, but probably in any situation.

Pete Mockaitis
That will do it. I’d love to hear what’s your verbiage that you settled upon for the gym situation or the friend/coworker not pulling the weight situation. Can we hear it? Flashback, you’re back there in the scene, what were the words you said?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah. Well the gym situation is a friend of mine.

The other person not pulling their weight, this was years ago before I went through my exercise in studying awkwardness. I didn’t say anything. I never said anything. Actually the resentment grew, and grew, and grew and I don’t consider this person a friend anymore, which I guess that sometimes happens with coworkers.

Looking back I have a really negative feeling about it. I think that I could have stopped that and we could have had a much better working relationship. That’s kind of an example of I just was afraid to have the conversation. I would tell everybody else, like, “I can’t believe I’m doing all the work,” but I never said it to this person. I’m sorry that I didn’t.

I write in the book about I kind of had a spotty track record of rising to the moment of awkwardness. There was a time I was a brand new manager and some folks had kind of complained to me about one of my direct reports. He’s kind of rude. He’s making more work for others. We’re having our weekly one-on-one and I literally had written down in my notes ‘address attitude’ and I didn’t do it. I didn’t know how to bring it up, so I didn’t do it.

I have fallen. I have not stood up in moments of awkwardness. It’s hard. It can be really hard. However, I think since kind of studying the heck out of this feeling I have kind of become less afraid of it.

This is pretty awkward at work I guess. We went through a reorg here last summer as I was kind of finishing up the book. All the sudden I didn’t know who my boss was, which is like a really embarrassing thing to have to admit because I kind of let it go on for a couple of weeks. It was like, “Um, like who is-?” like that Dr. Seuss book like, “Are you my mommy?”

But I just asked directly. I just went into my old boss’s office and I was like, “Hey, this is kind of weird, but are you still my boss? Is this other person my boss?” He was like, “Oh, yeah you should know that. Okay, here let me,” going through ….

I am just so a fan of being direct. The things you do that you think are saving you from awkwardness kind of just dig you in further sometimes.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s kind of what’s connected for me in terms of we fear these negative outcomes if you go there directly, but there are other negative outcomes if you don’t with regard to one, you may have the resentment that resulted in the disruption of the relationship or two for the rude coworker with the bad attitude, if you never address that for him, I don’t know where he ended up, but-

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, I’m not doing him a favor in the long run.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, he could get fired.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
And he’s broke because you didn’t go there. Not to heap the guilt on you Melissa.

Melissa Dahl
Right, right.

Pete Mockaitis
But yeah, negative outcomes can happen for not going on there that far exceed the negative outcomes that you fear for going there.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah. I also sometimes think we think we’re avoiding an awkward conversation because we’re trying to protect the other person’s feelings, but I think it’s more often we’re protecting ourselves. We don’t want to come off as a critical negative person.

If it’s a boss situation, you want to be the cool boss or whatever or you want to be the cool coworker, like, “I’m chill. It’s fine. Do whatever you want,” but I think it kinder in the long run to have those conversations.

Pete Mockaitis
When you say cool boss I don’t know why I’m thinking about, what was it A.C. Slater or Will Riker, always backwards chair. “What’s up?”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. That’s how I have my meetings, take a chair, turn it around backwards, “Hey, …”

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, you’re so cool.

Melissa Dahl
You want a cigarette?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh that is cool.

But that’s a great perspective when it comes to you’re protecting yourself as opposed to their feelings. In a way if you think about what we’d call a hero or a person who is really loving or generous, it’s a person who takes a personal risk for the benefit of another.

It’s like, you’re scared of what’s to come but you know that they’ll be enriched by you sharing it potentially if they receive it. They might just reject it. But there’s a chance of them really being enriched and there’s a risk of you suffering some kind of a consequence. It might be just an awkward feeling. It might be a damaged relationship or …. So in a way you going there makes you a hero.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah. I should say, it’s not like it’s guaranteed that these conversations will always go well. The person might not react well, but I think that you can only control what you can control.

But the other thing I kind of wanted to say is sometimes you’re on the receiving end of the awkwardness, someone is pointing out something about you won’t want to hear, someone is saying to you like, “Hey, I’ve been doing all your work for you the last three weeks or something.” You’re like, “Wait, that’s because I was – that’s because of this, that’s because of that.”

I think when we’re in that situation our natural reaction is to be pretty defensive. I think if, as I kind of think awkwardness comes from, in part at least, from that gap between how you see yourself and how others see you, this is an example of that that someone is showing you, like “I see you in this pretty unflattering light.”

It’s our natural reaction to kind of push that out, but I think it’s really useful sometimes to kind of sit there in the awkwardness and hear what the other person has to say about you. It’s not always necessarily true, but sometimes it is. Sometimes other people’s perspectives about you are worth hearing because other people can see parts of us that we can’t really see. That’s the other side of that.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh yeah. Do you have any pro tips if you’re feeling defensive, you’re hearing something, you don’t like it, you’re getting those defensive vibes bubbling up inside, what’s the best practice?

Melissa Dahl
All I can think is – something that helps is maybe kind of to take a third person perspective almost of the situation or just kind of distance yourself from the situation a little bit it helps, just think, “Okay, this is what this person thinks of me. It doesn’t mean I’m a bad person. It doesn’t even mean it’s necessarily true, but this is one opinion of me. This is one viewpoint on me. Let me see if I can look at this, step outside of myself and look at this from their perspective and kind of try to evaluate it subjectively.”

Trying to kind of tap into a cooler mindset rather than the kind of heated response I think helps. Then just to me kind of having a mindset of, “This could help me grow. This could help me become a better person. If what this person is telling me is true and if it is something I can improve on then thank God they told me.”

Like the direct report I had who was pretty rude to people around the office, he was a nice guy. I’m sure he wasn’t doing it on purpose.

If I had had that conversation with him, I would hope he could have just let that in and let that perspective of himself in and let it clash with how he sees himself, I don’t know, and maybe use that perspective and use that feedback to maybe become a little closer towards that person he thinks he is or you think you are to turn it back to you. Anyway, I hope that makes sense.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, that is good. Certainly to focus in on like, “I don’t like this. I think this is bullcrap,” etcetera to, “There might be something worthwhile within this to facilitate my growth and so I will receive it.”

That third-person perspective sounds handy. Then maybe even just spending some time with it after the fact in terms of, “I thought that was outrageous. They don’t have the right context for it, but this huh. I’ve never heard that before.”

Melissa Dahl
Yeah. It’s sort of back to the analogy of having a picture taken of you where you look really unfamiliar to yourself. It’s true that maybe it did catch you at a bad angle or it’s just a weird look on your face or something, but it shows you a side of yourself you couldn’t see.

You don’t have to take it and be like, “Oh that’s me. I always have that weird look on my face,” or, “My hair’s always doing something weird.” But sometimes I think it’s good to see those unflattering aspects of yourself that you can’t really see on your own.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool, thank you. Tell me, Melissa, anything else you really want to make sure to cover before we shift gears and hear about some of your favorite things.

Melissa Dahl
Let’s see. I guess maybe just kind of going back to the part about how these moments can help us connect with each other. I did Jordan Harbinger’s podcast. He also had a story about running into a lamp post, which was like, “Wait, what?” I was so surprised to hear that.

What I have come to really love about these moments is if we look at it in the right light, it’s like these little moments where a very real, vulnerable part of you can connect with a very real vulnerable part of somebody else.

As I’ve done interviews and stuff, people have kind of broken in with their own stories like, “Oh my gosh, that reminds me of this time. That reminds me of that time.” There is something very cool about this little feeling and these little moments that just – they have the power to kind of connect us in a way that I didn’t really appreciate before I started working on this.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Thank you. Now can you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Melissa Dahl
I don’t know if this qualifies as a favorite quote, but something I keep returning too lately is ‘constant vigilance’ from Harry Potter, which is the Mad-Eye Moody says this. It’s about keeping on guard against the Death Eaters or something like that.

But I’ve just been thinking about that in terms of I’m trying to get back into shape. The only way to do it is – I think the way I’m interpreting that quote is the only way to do something really is the hard way if you want to do it well.

I’m trying to get back into shape and I’ve just kind of been halfheartedly doing some workouts. I’ve had this quote in mind. It’s kind of helped – this is so stupid, but it’s kind of helped me stick to – yeah, I have to stick to this workout plan. I said I was going to run three miles today; I’m going to run three miles today.

Just the idea of – I think it says to me that little efforts made every single day add up to something. It’s the constant work that adds up to big results, which is not what it means in the book, but that’s what it means in my head right now.

Pete Mockaitis
Well great. Thank you. But how about a favorite study or experiment or piece of research?

Melissa Dahl
Oh my gosh, I have so many of these.

One of them, this is a good one to really what we’ve been talking about. In my work I have covered, I don’t know, hundreds of studies or something like that. Most of them just kind of leave my brain the second the story is done, but this one has stayed with me.

There’s this cool study by a Harvard Business School professor. You might have heard about this. People talk about this one.

Basically, you can do this very cool magic trick if you’re feeling nervous. Basically if you tell yourself you’re actually feeling excited, that is supposed to help you perform better because the theory kind of goes that to your body nervousness feels the same as excitement.

Your blood is pumping. Your heart is racing. That’s just your body knowing that you’ve got something big you’ve got to do. Your body’s like, “Here we go. Here. Here’s all this extra energy. We’re ready. We’re ready.”

If you interpret it as nervousness, it can make you kind of screw up on the thing you’re about to do, but if you interpret it as excitement, it’s supposed to help. I have thought about that so many times since I read that study five years ago. I find it so helpful.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Think you. How about a favorite book?

Melissa Dahl
There’s so many books. Let’s see. Okay, I don’t know if this is a favorite book – I don’t even know if I have a one singular favorite book right now, but maybe it’s this. I don’t know. Something I return to again and again is Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott. It’s a classic. It’s the kind of thing I’ve just pressed on all my writer friends over the years. That’s how I found it. An older writer friend at a newspaper I worked at was like, “Here you go. Read this.”

It’s writing advice, but it’s also just kind of wisdom and advice for life. Just reading that book – I’ve reread it so many times. It has such … advice for writing. She has the idea of the shitty first draft, which is just like letting yourself write the bad version of the thing and you have to do that before you get to the good version of it. It’s just a wonderful, wonderful book, especially if you’re a writer.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool. How about a favorite tool?

Melissa Dahl
I guess maybe we could say Slack. We use that at my work. A lot of people are using it now. There’s ups and downs, but I think it’s helped make work feel a little more fun. It’s helped make my team feel more like a community or something. We’re just chatting all day and it’s helped us get to know each other better. Yeah, I guess I’ll say Slack, although sometimes it’s annoying too, but for the most part it’s good.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, cool. How about a favorite habit.

Melissa Dahl
I think that there really is something to the making your bed everyday thing. I’d actually love to do some kind of psychological analysis of that of maybe it’s sort of easy to do, but it’s something that you do in the morning and it really does just kind of set your day. It just kind of organizes things right away.

That one and writing my to-do list for tomorrow at the end of the previous day. I love doing that. That’s probably better than the make your bed thing because I don’t even do that every day. I want to switch my answer to that.

Writing your to-do list for the next day at the end of the previous day is so helpful because then you wake up and you just are like, “Oh yeah, these are my priorities today.” You can just jump right into that. That’s really helped.

Pete Mockaitis
Do you do that at the end of the workday or at the end of the ‘I’m about to fall asleep’ day?

Melissa Dahl
I do it at the end of the work day, but I recently read about some study. It was a pretty small study, but interesting though. It claimed that it helped people fall asleep faster if you write your to-do list right before you go to sleep.

I don’t know. I feel like there probably is some truth to that. Sometimes I feel like I’m going to sleep and my mind is just going over like, “Oh, I have to do this. I have to do this. I have to do that. Don’t forget that.” Right now I do it at the end of the workday, but maybe I should try moving that back a few hours.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m intrigued because in some ways – I can see if you’re ruminating, that’s great to stop that and relax. But I think for me, if I brought my attention to that which tomorrow holds, I would start getting excited and fired up and the opposite of sleepy. I’d be like, “Oh yeah, these are the things I get to do tomorrow.” I don’t know.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, I can see that too. I can see that too.

I’ve tried it a couple times and I don’t know. Maybe it’s only applicable if you like me are constantly going through your to-do list in your head when you’re falling asleep. The times I’ve tried it there is something nice to just being like, “Oh, you know what? I’ve already got that. I don’t have to worry about that. I’ve already got it. Calm down.” Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Is there a particular nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, they quote you back to yourself frequently?

Melissa Dahl
There’s a couple lines in the book people seem to like. There’s one – it’s just a throwaway line my editor actually wanted to cut, but it’s, “Being human is exhausting and embarrassing.” People have quoted that back to me.

Then there’s a line people seem to like that I also really like. It’s also from the book, which is, “The ridiculous in me honors the ridiculous in you,” which is kind of how I feel about these embarrassing moments.

Now when I see someone – I don’t know. Yesterday I saw someone fall over on the subway. She mistimed her getting up and I just felt this kind of sense of connection to this stranger, like, “Oh, you’re a dummy too just trying to make your way through the world.” People seem to like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. It’s funny, “The ridiculous in me,” acknowledges or greets, what is it?

Melissa Dahl
I think it said honors.

Pete Mockaitis
Honors. Yes. “Honors the ridiculousness in you.” I guess that – isn’t that what Namaste means? The light in me honors the light in you.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Sometimes I just end up saying Namaste for no reason. I think it’s because people have wet hands and they can’t shake my hand. I end up bowing and saying Namaste. I don’t know if that’s offensive to any hard core yoga lovers. Apologies.

Melissa Dahl
I’m sure it’s a nice sense of it.

Pete Mockaitis
It feels good and I mean it. Hey, I’m honoring them. We have a laugh because it is a little ridiculous. “No, I just have wet hands. There’s no need to revert to these practices.” Cool.

If folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Melissa Dahl
Probably Twitter is the place I am at way too often. They can also buy my book. It’s called Cringe Worthy: A Theory of Awkwardness available on Amazon.com or wherever you buy books, had to put that in there. But, yeah, Twitter, I’m on it way too much, so if you say hello, I will definitely see you and say hello back.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh cool. Do you have a final challenge or call to action you’d issue to folks seeing to be awesome at their jobs?

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, I think that fear of awkwardness at work is something that holds people back from, “Oh, I can’t have that conversation with my coworker. It’s going to be too weird.” “I can’t ask my boss this thing that I should have figured out three weeks ago. It’s going to be too weird.”

Maybe your challenge is to think about the problem you’re having or a few problems you’re having at work and if the thing holding you back from solving it is just you’re afraid of it being a little awkward, push through that. You can do it. You can get through that.

Pete Mockaitis
Awesome. Well, Melissa, this has been a whole lot of fun.

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, it’s been great.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you for taking time and-

Melissa Dahl
Yeah, thank you so much.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well good luck with the book and all you’re up to.

Melissa Dahl
Thank you. Thanks a lot.

261: Powering Up Your PowerPoint with Heather and Alan Ackmann

By | Podcasts | No Comments

 

 

Heather and Alan Ackmann say: "PowerPoint is... not a text-based medium; at heart it's a visual medium that uses text elements."

PowerPoint gurus Heather and Alan Ackmann share perspectives on how to take full advantage of PowerPoint for more impactful presentations.

You’ll Learn:

  1. When, why and how you should PowerPoint – and when you shouldn’t
  2. The three fundamental factors to consider when designing your slides
  3. When to use emotionally-driven graphics

About Heather & Alan

Alan Ackmann is the professional writing  for business coordinator in the Writing, Rhetoric, and Discourse department at DePaul University in Chicago, Illinois. His teaching specialties include professional and technical writing and the rhetoric of slideware and presentations. He has led professional development seminars for teachers on the local, state, and national level. In his spare time, he enjoys spending time with his wife and two children, as well as jogging, reading, and singing (though not always in that order).

Heather Ackmann is an author, Microsoft Certified Trainer, and Microsoft MVP. Since 2006, she has designed, authored, and narrated over 300 hours of video-based training for a variety of public and private entities. In 2016, she cofounded AHA Learning Solutions to provide high-quality learning materials to educational institutions and businesses nationally. She is an active member of the presentation community and a proud member of the Presentation Guild. You may find her sharing advice and Microsoft Office news on Twitter: @heatherackmann.

 

Items Mentioned in this Show:

Heather & Alan Ackmann Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Heather and Alan, thanks so much for joining us here on the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.

Heather Ackmann

Good to be here.

Alan Ackmann

Thanks for having us.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, I’m so intrigued that both of you climb stairs competitively. Tell us how did that become a hobby of yours and why do you keep doing it?

Heather Ackmann

Well, “competitively” is probably not the word to describe me; I’m usually like the last to finish. Alan’s got much better time than I do. And our son did it with us last year and he had great time. But we got into it through one of the companies I used to work with; that was TrainSignal, yeah. It recently got bought out – not recently but a few years ago – bought out by Pluralsight – that’s the company now.
But one of our colleagues – he was really involved with the Respiratory Health Association, and he would volunteer with them, and he would climb stairs. And he got our company involved, and our whole entire company like, “Yeah, let’s go climb stairs.” And so, that’s what we did as a company – we all joined a team together and got family members involved, and that’s how Alan got into it.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, it’s actually a pretty big thing here in Chicago, (a) because there are so many scrapers and (b) because the weather is so terrible for six months of the year. So, you can have a lot of 5K or 10K runs in the summer time…

Heather Ackmann

It’s beautiful.

Alan Ackmann

Right now, I look out the window and it’s nice and sunny, but it’s also -4° outside currently. So that means that people have to find other ways to stay active. So there are climbs for the Hancock building, the Willis Tower, the Aon Center, and a lot of the other iconic Chicago skyscrapers.

Heather Ackmann

But the Hustle Up the Hancock, I personally believe is the most fun to do. They usually put people in the stairwells with the big foam fingers and they’ll high five you every four floors or something and be like, “Oh, yeah!” And they put signs inside the stairwell to tell you how well you’re doing, like, “You’ve climbed higher than the Eiffel Tower.” And it’s a lot of fun.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, that’s right, Paris. You take that. We’re way taller.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

I did the Hustle Up the Hancock once at Bain and I remember… You talk about competitively – I remember, I think as compared to everybody in the Hustle Up the Hancock I think I was just slightly above average.

Heather Ackmann

Good for you!

Pete Mockaitis

Thank you. And then as compared to my Bain colleagues I was like last or second to last, and it’s like, “This is how I kind of feel about my career.”

Alan Ackmann

It’s kind of funny – for a while when I was young doing it, it was a question of trying to beat my time from the previous year. And as I’ve gotten a little older into the upper 30s, it’s more like trying to not be significantly worse than my time from the previous year. So, it’s more like competing with previous performances.

Heather Ackmann

Or yourself. I just want to finish at this point. After two kids – yeah, I just want to finish and not pass out and have to be carried out on a stretcher. It’s kind of my goal.

Pete Mockaitis

And you’re succeeding, so kudos on those accomplishments.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah, I’m here to talk about it, so I’m succeeding gloriously.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, you two are an interesting couple, not just for your stair-climbing enthusiasm, but also because both of you study and teach on PowerPoint. And sometimes that happens together, or is it all in your own unique context?

Heather Ackmann

Well, on rare occasions we do talk about it together, but most the time we kind of pass projects off to each other. We have our own separate audiences that we train too. Alan deals more with an academic audience – students and other professors.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, students and professional development for teachers.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah. And I deal more with professionals, people in business context, or more “train the trainer” situations for the professional context.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, cool. So now let’s really… Boy, we could talk about PowerPoint for a long time, and maybe we’ll need a follow-up interview to go into it. So, could you tell us broadly speaking, when is PowerPoint the ideal tool to use, versus when should we use maybe another software, tool, or an entirely different approach to doing a presentation?

Alan Ackmann

For me, I guess it starts not with the question of when to use PowerPoint, but why to use PowerPoint. I think that there are a lot of people who will sometimes go for PowerPoint as the default tool, where they use it either because it’s something that they are expected to use as part of a presentation for example, and so it’s really easy to think about PowerPoint as something that you just kind of inherit.
But if you are making your own choices, then PowerPoint is the best I think when you have an opportunity to use it in a way that will benefit the viewer or listener’s experience, because when PowerPoint I think is used in an unproductive way, it becomes something that is used because it helps the speaker. It turns into something like a teleprompter, it becomes a way of taking the burden of explanation off of you as a presenter, and kind of shunting it off towards the slide themselves.
And in that case it’s not PowerPoint as something that’s going to help a reader understand your main ideas, or organize the logic behind what you have to say, or create some kind of an emotional impact. It’s just a way for an instructor to get through it. So, one of the biggest challenges that I see is people kind of falling into that trap. So, if you don’t have a situation like that where it’s good for a listener, then that by itself is kind of indicative of it might being a bad choice.

Heather Ackmann

Along the same lines, even in terms of our various audiences. There are certain people in both groups, who shun PowerPoint, or just slideware in general, doesn’t necessarily have to be PowerPoint. And the reasons that they shun them aren’t necessarily surrounded about the “When” or even the “Why”, but the tool itself, because it’s been overused or because it has been abused. And those are also the wrong reasons to shun a particular tool. You need to look at, I would say more along the lines of the context, or why it’s helping that particular presentation or that moment.
So, when looking at why you would use a tool such as PowerPoint, like how is it helping that presentation – PowerPoint is created as ideally a visual aid. Why would you need a visual? How is it helping the content of the presentation, how is it helping the speaker collect their ideas or tell that story? And those are the questions you should be asking in helping determine when and how you should be utilizing PowerPoint.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, perfect. I like that. So not just accepting it as the default: “Oh, this is the thing to do because it’s there.” Thinking about it not as a teleprompter, and more a tool for the audience and not for the presenter, and thinking when would a visual really do the trick. So that’s helpful to think about slideware, which is such a fun word. It brings back the consulting days. It sounds so elegant, like glassware in a laboratory. Slideware. So then, let’s talk about slideware. When would you say maybe Prezi or Keynote or something else might be a wiser choice than PowerPoint?

Heather Ackmann

Oh, gosh. Prezi. I don’t use Prezi that often. In fact, you’re familiar with the conference The Presentation Summit?

Pete Mockaitis

It’s ringing a bell. I’ve never been.

Heather Ackmann

Oh, you have to go! It’s so much fun! It’s where all of the great presentation designers and presenters, speakers… Dr. Carmen Simon, who I know has been on your show.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh yeah.

Heather Ackmann

She speaks there, she’s a keynote speaker there almost every year. Everyone loves her. 
So The Presentation Guild is kind of a non-profit organization for presentation designers, people who design presentations, who speak in the industry, who work in the industry. It’s an organization for them. And they go to the Presentation Summit and basically help fellow designers there. Yeah, it’s a place to go.

Pete Mockaitis

Cool.

Heather Ackmann

So at this conference, someone off-handedly referred to Prezi as kind of a one-night stand – you use it once and… I think that was a bit harsh, but Prezi does have its place and certainly companies do expect – or not expect but request Prezi presentations from time to time. And it does have kind of a unique look and feel, but I’ve also seen Prezi used what I’d say poorly, where it’s just basically sections that have been called out and with the title and the bullets underneath, and it’s just zooming from one place to another.
Another context where Prezi is not really appropriate is for webinars, where you just don’t have the screen capture, the upload, the frame rate to really handle it. So again, you kind of have to think of the environment where you’re presenting, and whether or not it can handle it. I’m an online student at DePaul, and I’ve had some professors try to use Prezi, and when you’re watching back a lecture as an online student you just miss all those animations; it’s just not there. So, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, so that’s the Prezi story. So now Keynote is pretty similar to PowerPoint, although with its own flavor. So, how might you speak to Keynote or some of the other slideware tools available?

Heather Ackmann

Honestly I really don’t use Keynote. I know a lot of my PowerPoint MVP colleagues, they use Keynote a lot more than I do. I’m a PC girl; I stick to the PC.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, in terms of persona, I’m kind of the same way. Thinking back to the old marketing campaigns, I’m much more the dweeby PC guy than the hipster Mac guy in the end. And my loyalty is with PowerPoint, kind of go the same way.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah, they run pretty deep, so…

Alan Ackmann

I think it’s interesting though, with PowerPoint – if you look at it from kind of a market dominance point of view, it’s difficult for me to answer a question about Keynote, because it seems fundamentally to operate along kind of the same software logic that PowerPoint does. So, a lot of the best practices for it are pretty similar. And so in that case you’re talking a little bit about maybe what tool would be optimal, but I don’t think a lot of the underlying strategy would change very much, especially if you think about PowerPoint and Keynote as being something using it purposefully as opposed to what technical advantages it can offer. Can I go back to Prezi for just a second?

Pete Mockaitis

Oh sure.

Alan Ackmann

So, Prezi is a really interesting use case for me, because it almost reminds me of some of the earlier versions of PowerPoint and how it was marketed. In the earlier versions of PowerPoint, when they were first debuting a lot of animations and transitions, it was all about the new kind of gadgets and impacts that PowerPoint could have, going back a couple of variations back in the program.
And I look at Prezi presentations, and a lot of it reminds me of what you would see in PowerPoint presentations from like 10 years ago, when animations were first becoming available, because when used badly it becomes less about, “Look at the message I have to say” and more about, “Look at what this cool tool can do.” So when people get into Prezi and they get kind of enamored with the various transitions and swoops and zooms and all those things that can really add a neat… I’ve seen a lot of Prezis where they add a lot of neat aesthetic texture, but not a lot where it complements the material.
The exception is when people are giving presentations that are kind of about dealing with the individual components of a larger thing. So, if you’ve got a presentation for example about a departmental reorganization and you want to start with a global view, and then zoom into the individual departments themselves and their components and purposes – that can do a really good job of maybe demonstrating how the individual things fit into the larger perspective, which can really I think serve a very persuasive purpose.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, yeah. Or maybe from a sales presentation perspective, if, “Hey, here’s this cool piece of hardware and here’s how it works, with regard to some of the sub-components.”

Alan Ackmann

Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, I’m with you.

Alan Ackmann

I would love to see a Prezi that’s almost in technical communication, kind of an exploded diagram of components and how the individual component of an engine works, or something like that. Again, that’s a purposeful use, instead of just, “Look at the thing that it can do.”

Heather Ackmann

Yeah. And it’s really hard for individuals who are not naturally visually inclined to be able to take their material on black and white paper and to translate it into something that is largely visual. It’s easy for me to do, but not everyone’s like that. And so, it’s just when you have a tool like Prezi that’s like this large open canvas, where there really isn’t a lot of suggestions – you just see this large open white piece of paper. And I think that kind of just stumps the user, and what do they do? It’s like opening up a white butcher paper almost, like, “What do I draw?” It can be really intimidating, and so without a little bit I think of hand-holding or examples to look at, I just think people just don’t know how to visualize their own ideas in a three-dimensional space, which ultimately that is Prezi.

Alan Ackmann

And a lot of what PowerPoint does through its use of smart art and those kinds of quasi-directed template-driven design, is to give the user that direction that you were just expressing.

Heather Ackmann

At least some kind of ideas with what to do with it, even though they’re not always perfect and they’re not always necessarily helpful to that rhetorical context, to throw out that word there. But it can be helpful, it can be harmful, but I think more times than not those aids in PowerPoint are helpful.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, cool, thank you. So we talked about when to use a PowerPoint or a Keynote type tool, and then you’ve also done some teaching on some potential uses of PowerPoint, sort of beyond the traditional, “Hey, I’m going to do a presentation. Here’s a slide, here’s another slide.” Can you share some of those?

Alan Ackmann

Well, the one that immediately leaps to mind is kind of the most far-out one; isn’t necessarily a practical one, but the kind of neat, almost artistic experimental work people are doing with PowerPoint in movies, like trying to make little short films or cartoons just using PowerPoint as a device. And those kinds of things are about stretching the boundaries of what is typically considered a presentation software and what it can be. So, the part of me that just likes kind of tracking emerging ways to create art, is fascinated by that.
And a lot of other use cases in PowerPoint get near the further away you drift, almost, from the conventional sales presentation, like for example everybody’s seen a presentation at a wedding for example, where it’s a slide show of the people as they’ve grown up and met. It can play something soft and manipulative from easy listening stations.
But the thing is, a lot of PowerPoint is I think splintering off into little sub-genres like that, where you’ve got PowerPoint that is something like a family togetherness aid. That’s an awkward way to phrase it, but PowerPoint is serving a social function more than a persuasive or professional function there. And the thing that I’m also kind of interested in… Some of my background is in literature and creative writing, before I got into studying professional communication. And we would study different forms of poetry, and formal poetry like sonnets and things like that. And there’s a style of PowerPoint now that’s kind of emerging – Pecha Kucha. Is that how you pronounce it? Well, mangled that one.

Heather Ackmann

I don’t even know if I’m saying it right. It’s one of those words that’s just you look at and…

Alan Ackmann

No, I remember that – it’s like the old Muppet thing – Pecha Kucha. I think that’s how I’ve heard it pronounced.

Heather Ackmann

I don’t know, we’re probably butchering it.

Alan Ackmann

But it’s a very kind of regimented way of doing PowerPoint, where it’s only like 20 slides at 20 seconds each.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, like ignite or a fire or lightening round. I’ve heard them call that at events.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, everything is constrained, so it’s about what people can do with their material within those constraints. And when I first heard about that I was like, “Well, that’s just adding artifice.” But all art is essentially going to be artifice to some extent, and there’s going to constraints in there, just like you would have a sonnet of I Am, a pentameter in 14 lines, and all the other limitations. So I think it’s fascinating to see little things like that with PowerPoint kind of emerging organically as people start putting in this new formal structure to it.

Heather Ackmann

I think the Pecha Kucha was started by architects.

Alan Ackmann

That makes sense.

Heather Ackmann

They wanted to showcase their designs without talking about them profusely.

Alan Ackmann

That’s really interesting.

Pete Mockaitis

That’s helpful.

Alan Ackmann

That’s the thing about architecture and that struggle between form and function. And it seems like the Pecha Kucha is kind of about that tension to a large extent.

Pete Mockaitis

And so now when you spoke about a family or a togetherness aid, I don’t know if I’m familiar with this usage. Can you unfold that a bit? Is it just for the two of you, or is it for other people?

Heather Ackmann

Well, PowerPoint has brought us together.

Alan Ackmann

No, I was referring more to the PowerPoint at weddings than that kind of thing.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, that’s what you meant. Okay, I’m following.

Heather Ackmann

And funerals.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, I’ve seen that too, where people will make at a wake for example a presentation about significant moments in a person’s life. And I think that those kinds of situations are hard for most people. It’s hard to be articulate, it’s hard to say everything you want to say, and so people turn to things like PowerPoint as a means of…

Heather Ackmann

Coping, like a script for the moment.

Alan Ackmann

And as a means of kind of honoring and having a shared experience, where everyone watches the same slides and it triggers the same kinds of memories. And it’s a way of having a more insulated, safer way of grappling with the emotions of those kinds of big things.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, I like it. Thank you. So now let’s dig into maybe some of the core principles and concepts when it comes to…

Heather Ackmann

Oh, I want to go back a little bit.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay.

Heather Ackmann

We talked about some of the uses of PowerPoint that people don’t know – I want to go back to this video thing. He mentioned movies. Well, social media – video is like king in social media right now, but a lot of people just don’t have the budget for a film crew or for just hiring people to develop videos. You can develop right now 4K resolution videos right from PowerPoint, and with the animation techniques that you can create in PowerPoint very simply through transitions like the morph transition – I don’t know if you’re familiar with that one – available with the Office 365 subscription.
Using that morph transition, animating between slides to move objects around and just to animate – it’s so fast. I’ve got a video on that on YouTube right now, just how to morph, use that morph transition – walks you through it. But it’s so easy and you can create really, really nice looking videos and export them right as an MP4. And you can follow the video specs for Twitter, for things like Snapchat. Just create the dimensions of your slide to those output specs and create your social media campaign right from within PowerPoint.
So that is a very simple use case that a lot of people haven’t thought of. And with social media, it changes so rapidly, you have to be able to produce content so quickly. And having that dedicated film crew to use those fancier production tools like the rapid-fire there, the ROI necessarily isn’t right there. But with PowerPoint, it is. You can create it quickly, cheaply, and have just about anyone produce it for those social media channels.

Pete Mockaitis

That is cool, thank you.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, cool. So now I want to talk a bit about some of the principles and conceptual pillars associated with what makes a slide great. And so Heather, you sort of lay out a number of core principles to start with, with regard to thinking through this, even before we get into a given slide. What are those?

Heather Ackmann

Well, in the course I have on Lynda I kind of lay it out based on what you mentioned – the three pillars, and for that it’s the audience, the environment, and the message or the content that you’re trying to deliver for your audience. And that I just sort of define as pillars, but all that is based on really classic rhetoric.
But when you’re thinking of your slide, a lot of people just sort of think about the message and how it relates in PowerPoint, and that’s as far as it goes for a lot of people. They sometimes forget about the audience. Or maybe they’ll think about the audience a little bit and the message a little bit, but completely forget about the environment, or where the presentation will be held or presented.
And that can have a huge impact on the look of the slides or how the slides are perceived, where you’re presenting such as a huge auditorium with thousands and thousands of people where that message will be projected on giant screens, versus a small tiny boardroom with just 20 people. Or if that PowerPoint’s going to be opened on a mobile device and just read by the CEO of the company very quickly in his car on the way to the airport.
That’s all going to have a huge impact on how that message will be read and perceived. And a lot of people neglect to think about that when designing their slides, in terms of the font choices, even the colors, or the space or layout of information on that slide. And that all plays a part.

Pete Mockaitis

That’s so excellent. I’m also thinking in terms of, will they’d be printouts available to folks?

Heather Ackmann

Oh yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

And then Nick Morgan’s favorite pet peeve is like, “I know you can’t read this, but…”

Heather Ackmann

Yeah, yeah.

Alan Ackmann

And I encounter that environment limitation a lot, because I teach at university but I don’t teach in the same room every term. And I’ve had rooms before where they’re really deep rooms and they go seven, eight rows back, and others that are more shotgun-style rooms, where it’s three tables or three rows with a bunch of lengthy tables. And so I’ve had times before where I’ve had a slide deck that I would have as a go-to deck for a lecture that I deliver every term. And I’ve had to modify it just because it’s going to be interfering with the environment. And sometimes you really can’t predict or control environments. Going to conferences is a big point of stress for me, partly because you never know what the room is going to be like.

Heather Ackmann

And a lot of times they give you a conference template that some designer created, not knowing what the environment’s going to be like. They booked the rooms after they create the template or the template designers have no idea anything about the specs of the conference itself.

Alan Ackmann

My favorite story about how environment can gum up the works came when I was actually sitting in a presentation. We have department meetings on a pretty regular basis for one thing or another, and there was one time I was at a department meeting where someone was giving a presentation, and it was a session that also had lunch accompanying it.
So I happened to be sitting in the back row, or kind of where they were going to be setting up the lunch buffet, catering was. And it was a lunch food tray that had this really kind of potent-smelling ham that was behind me during the entire presentation. So, I’m sitting there… I was an ideal audience member at that point – I was there by choice, I was actively interested in it, I was taking notes. There was no need to convince me of anything. And I’m just sitting really trying to listen, and all I can think is, “Wow, it smells like ham in here.” And not like good Thanksgiving ham, like a little bit of … to the ham.

Heather Ackmann

I still give this example when I teach, by the way.

Pete Mockaitis

I’ve seen a great speaker – when they realize that the wafting scent of the food is there, they’ll sort of take a time-out, check with the organizer: “Can they just eat this now and then I’ll talk after that?” Because then they just know there’s no hope.

Heather Ackmann

That goes back to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs – your participants are in the room thinking about food, especially when the lunch tray’s delivered. Why would you keep talking? Food comes before anything else.

Pete Mockaitis

Totally. And Alan, I really want to follow up on what you said, with regard to if it’s a deep versus a shallow room, you adjust the slides. Can you share what sorts of adjustments do you make within those environmental context shifts?

Alan Ackmann

Well, if it’s a deep room versus a shallow room, the first thing I have to adjust is the size of any text that’s on the screen, the resolution that a slide can support. The further back people get, the harder it’s going to be to be able to track what’s on the slide. And so in those cases if I would have a lecture for example that has kind of an anchor slide at the end, that’s a, “Here are the five most important things to take away from the class period” kind of slide, in a conventional classroom I might make those just a standard top-down bullet point, which I think that is a use case where it’s an appropriate design choice. But if it’s a deeper room, where I think it’s not going to be able to support the font for that, then maybe break that across five different slides and have one point isolated on each slide, in a way that even the people in the back are going to be able to hear it and use it.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah, white space between graphic elements is also important in those larger-room environments too, just to separate elements that don’t go together, because from far away anything that looks close together looks like it goes together. So, they look like one and the same, or they should be one and the same. But with the more space you place between graphic elements, they look more like separate ideas or separate elements.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay, cool. That’s a great example there of how with a shift in environment you adjust what you’re doing in the PowerPoint. Could you also give us an example within the realm of audience versus message? Or sorry, so if it’s like, “Hey, if an audience is more like this sort of audience, do this, versus if they’re the opposite, do that.” And likewise, with message.

Alan Ackmann

This is a complicated question, because it starts moving outside of PowerPoint as just a software platform, and into PowerPoint as kind of a presentation practice. To take it back a little bit further from that, just thinking critically about the kind of audience you’re going to be talking to, and what their needs are going to be.
When I’m teaching, for example, it to students, a lot of what we need to do is just make sure that students would understand the concepts that are being presented. So in that case it’s mostly an informative presentation, and that’s different than something like a sales presentation, where you might have some content, but it’s about motivating somebody to a kind of action – you want them to go to a website or consider an idea, versus just trying to get them to understand the nuts and bolts behind a concept.

Heather Ackmann

That’s a good point. For a class situation, there’s objectives, there’s a group of information, material, that as a whole you’re hoping that they’ll take away. Not necessarily remember all at once, as soon as it comes out of your mouth, but you’re hoping that they’ll come back to the lecture materials and then study it on their own and at least remember the concepts to go back to either the textbook, the PowerPoint slides themselves, and basically to further study on their own, because basically your lecture and any PowerPoint slides you provide them are there to hopefully be as a study aid, so for further learning. That’s ideal, right?

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah.

Heather Ackmann

In theory. But in a professional context – and now I’m thinking of Dr. Carmen Simon’s book here.

Pete Mockaitis

Impossible to Ignore.

Heather Ackmann

Impossible to Ignore. So, for that one in that context, you’re wanting to pick out the most important details that your audience wants to remember and turn it into, again, that action item. And so for there, the goal is a very singular point and not a collection of points.

Alan Ackmann

Well, I’m thinking about occasions where the content of what you’re presenting doesn’t change very much, but the audience does, and the kind of things you would do to customize. Some of the most impactful presentations that I’ve seen, and I’m always going all the way back to Driver’s Ed, where there were presentations about drinking and driving, and why you shouldn’t do it.
And they were these very kind of emotionally-hinged presentations with a lot of clear attempts to demonstrate the possible stakes behind drinking and driving. And that’s very different than something that would be given on the same topic to a group of legal professionals about trying to defend and identify a legal standard of what classifies as driving under the influence, and if so, ways to defend or try to prosecute people in those kinds of contexts. Those are heavily logically-driven.
And you could pull in the same statistics about the impact that drinking and driving can have, high frequency among users in a young demographic, consequences, but in one case it’s a larger objective of convincing people not to do it, and in another case it’s a question of, “Here’s how to handle it if you’ve got a client who’s been convicted of drinking and driving.” And that’s very different from somebody where the same information might be, but for an officer who has a job where they’ve identified someone as possibly driving under the influence, and how to kind of identify or deal with people in those kinds of situations.

Pete Mockaitis

And so then from a slide perspective, what do you envision as being some key things you would do differently in that logical argument versus the emotional power persuasion?

Alan Ackmann

Well, this is all strictly back of the envelope here.

Heather Ackmann

Well, for the Driver’s Ed class it would be emotionally-driven graphics, so visuals would be very key there – full color, large…

Pete Mockaitis

It’s like the whole slide there’s a tragic human being, and blood and death.

Heather Ackmann

Yeah.

Alan Ackmann

I don’t think you even need to get graphic.

Heather Ackmann

You don’t even need to get horribly graphic, just suggestive.

Alan Ackmann

Although that is an interesting kind of secondary consideration, is how graphic would be appropriate? But you think of any kind of visual, particularly a pictorial visual, is going to be in many cases emotionally powerful. It’s something that’s meant to have a pathos appeal, versus a logos appeal. And the kind of thing that isn’t going to be effective, at least with the younger demographic in the, “I’m sitting through Driver’s Ed because I have to do it to get my license, and I’d much rather be out doing other stuff” kind of environment – you’re not going to get a lot of time to draw an audience in to the most important things you have to say. And so, the easiest thing to express there is not the kind of statistical ratios; it’s the emotional impact, and choosing visuals would be a short way to do that.

Heather Ackmann

And consequences.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, consequences, and I’m also thinking about shorter text, less reliance on developing a logical argument, even though there’s obviously going to be kind of an implicit logic behind that “Why you shouldn’t drink and drive.” But those are the kinds of things that would jump out at me first.

Heather Ackmann

Then for the legal situation, it’s going to be a more logical argument. So for there, lawyers do a lot of reading…

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, it’s going to be able to support lengthier quotes, higher reliance on the speaker versus the impact of the slides themselves, because there’s generally going to be a little bit more audience buy-in, where you’re going to able to tolerate a little bit more of a patient delineation.

Heather Ackmann

Quite frankly I don’t envision that talk necessarily being delivered as a talk. I imagine that PowerPoint file being handed off to someone and scanned as they’re going from one place to another. So that’s more of what we’d call a walking deck or an info deck.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah, I use the term “archival slide deck”.

Heather Ackmann

Archival slide deck, whatever term you choose to use for it. But that PowerPoint deck probably won’t be projected anywhere and presented in a traditional sense; it’ll be read. So, that one I think would be designed actually more like a document than a docuslide. I think that’s Duarte’s term, I don’t remember.

Alan Ackmann

I’ve heard docuslide, I’ve heard slideument.

Heather Ackmann

Slideument, yeah. People come up with all kinds of fun words. It’s not like a presentation in the traditional sense, but it’s more like a document. So that’s kind of what I envision for the lawyer audience in the end. For the third audience – that’s the cop – no PowerPoint. That’s all demo, that’s upfront personal demo, no slides.

Pete Mockaitis

Perfect, thank you. So now, we’re having so much fun, but I want to make sure that we touch upon a few of the key design principles that show up and slides.

Alan Ackmann

Which one do you want to talk about?

Pete Mockaitis

Let’s say hierarchy.

Alan Ackmann

Okay. For me hierarchy is about identifying what the most important element of the slide is, and then picking, making a visual design that is about supporting that main idea. I have a slide in one of my courses, where it’s about how students perceive a presentation and how long they’re willing to listen.
And the slide there is a kind of, not a forced perspective shot, but there is a student in the foreground who’s kind of turned around, and then in the background, farther off in the distance, there’s a blurred out version of a chalkboard or a whiteboard. So you can kind of see that it’s there, but it’s clearly secondary to the student themselves, because that design or that particular slide is not about what the presentation is; it’s about how students are going to respond to presentations, so that gets the visual focus.

Pete Mockaitis

Got you.

Alan Ackmann

And my favorite story on that – my first day of graduate school my instructor was an old Southern lady. And she walked in and said, “This is the most important thing I’m going to tell y’all about writing.” And on the board she wrote down, “Serve the whole.” And what that meant was that in any kind of story or point of communication you identify, “What’s the most important thing I want to say?” and then design secondary choices around furthering that important thing. But the reason I’ve always remembered it is because she had really bad penmanship and she kind of wrote it on the board without reading it out loud.

Heather Ackmann

With this really curly cute Southern scroll.

Alan Ackmann

Yeah. And so it looked like, “Serve the whale.” And so I’m looking at it and I’m going, “Serve the whale? What does that mean?”

Heather Ackmann

She never actually said, “Serve the whole.”

Alan Ackmann

So she just stepped back and had people read it and ponder it. And I’m like, “Serve the whale? What does that mean?” But I caught on after a couple of minutes, like, “Oh, this is ‘Serve the whole’. Oh, maybe graduate school is not hard, okay.” Then I think it’s a really important kind of anchor concept, because hierarchy is about identifying what’s most important. And I just talk about that in a visual way, but it also happens with things like the size of text – larger text is perceived as more important than smaller text, big visuals are perceived as dominant to captions, and those kinds of things.

Heather Ackmann

And for the structure of the presentation as a whole – you can have a hierarchy throughout the entire slide deck – what slides in the presentation stand out? You know how in PowerPoint you’ve got that slide sorter view, where you can zoom out and see all your slides from kind of like this bird’s eye view? What slides stand out? What’s the hierarchy there from that view? What five slides out of that, I don’t know, 100 slides that you have in that presentation – if you have that many – stand out? Because those five slides out of that 100 – those are going to be the ones that in theory will gain or garner that attention, if they do stand out visually. So there’s a hierarchy to the individual slides, the slide deck together, and then from a content standpoint as well. So you’re creating kind of a visual hierarchy and even a content hierarchy.

Pete Mockaitis

Oh excellent, thank you. Well, tell me, Heather and Alan – is there anything else that you want to make sure to mention right upfront, before we hear about a couple of your favorite things?

Alan Ackmann

For me, the most common question that I get is about text on a slide, and how much text should be on there, and how it should be used. And I think that that question kind of comes from misunderstanding how PowerPoint is designed to operate. It’s not a text-based medium; at heart it’s a visual medium that uses text elements. And I think that in terms of my own kind of professional development that I’ve lead, that’s one of ideas that really seems to resonate with people, is thinking of PowerPoint not just as something that contains your script, but as something that is meant to contain visuals that enhance the presentation itself, and considering text as just one of those fundamentally visual elements.

Heather Ackmann

See, for me, when people ask me how much text is allowed on the slide, “How much should I use? Should I avoid it?”, or even when you get to the bullet point question: “Can I use bullet points? Are bullet points okay?”, I really don’t like answering those questions because I just don’t feel that that’s the right question you should be asking. Because again, for me it comes down to the audience, their expectations, the content, the environment, and what’s appropriate to use for that presentation, in that moment, in that time.
And there’s a lot of “ifs” there. And if your audience is expecting text, if they’re hoping for text, like those students in the classroom that plan on using those PowerPoint files to help them study – they expect text, they want text. And it may not be the best visual, it may not be the most engaging, but they want some kind of text document that they can quickly search, quickly scan, and use it to help them study. You may not use that as your lecture slides, but they want something.

Pete Mockaitis

Perfect, thank you.

Alan Ackmann

And it kind of goes back to the initial comment that I made when starting this podcast, which is about who the slide deck is designed to benefit. And if it’s a deck that is often designed to help the speaker, it ends up kind of overburdened with text; and if it’s designed to help the audience or the students, then text can be moderated appropriately.

Pete Mockaitis

Very good, thank you. Well now, could you share with us a favorite book, something that you found helpful?

Heather Ackmann

Oh, gosh. Well, my favorite design book… We’ve been talking about hierarchy, space, color, all these different design elements. My favorite design book primer – if anyone’s listening and wants to learn more about graphic design – great primer is by Alex W. White The Elements of Graphic Design. And I strongly recommend getting the hard copy physical book as opposed to the Kindle edition, because the pages are beautiful. So that’s a great one. There’s a lot of other graphic design books out there that talk about the same kind of visual design elements and graphic design elements, but I like Alex White. It’s a quick read, enjoyable read, lots of pretty pictures.

Alan Ackmann

And if I’m picking one that I think has a nice general audience appeal, it would be Nancy Duarte’s Slide:ology.

Alan Ackmann

And I like Slide:ology mostly because it’s got a very academic foundation to it, but it’s not in any way inaccessible. It’s very grounded in best practices, and it’s also very actionable. There’s a lot of little exercises and suggestions about how to create a good deck, in addition to understanding what a good slide deck might look like in a moment.

Heather Ackmann

And of course, Dr. Carmen Simon’s book Impossible to Ignore – we mentioned that one earlier. She’s been on your show.

Pete Mockaitis

Absolutely.

Heather Ackmann

Love her book.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, thank you. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch with you two, where would you point them?

Heather Ackmann

I have a website at HeatherAckmann.com, and I also have a YouTube channel – same thing – YouTube.com/HeatherAckmann.

Alan Ackmann

The easiest way to actually probably get a hold of me is through DePaul University, where I teach, and my email address is very accessible.

Alan Ackmann

Just go to DePaul’s directory, and I’m really easy to find.

Pete Mockaitis

Perfect, thank you. Well, Alan, Heather, thank you so much for sharing this stuff. It sounds like we have much more to dig into, and I appreciate it and I wish you tons of luck, and rocking and rolling tremendous presentations and experiences in the weeks and years ahead.

Heather Ackmann
Thank you!

Alan Ackmann
Thank you so much! Thanks for having us on.

253: How to Speak Out…Without a Freak Out with Matthew Abrahams

By | Podcasts | No Comments

 

 

Matthew Abrahams says: "As a communicator, your job is to be in service of your audience."

Stanford instructor Matt Abrahams teaches techniques to calm speaking anxieties…from managing procrastination to cooling body temperatures, and more.

You’ll Learn:

  1. How to attack both the symptoms and sources of speaking anxiety
  2. Why to envision communication as a conversation instead of a performance
  3. How long to make eye contact

About Matt 

Matt Abrahams is a passionate, collaborative and innovative educator and coach. He teaches Effective Virtual Communication and Essentials of Strategic Communication at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. Matt is also Co-Founder and Principal at Bold Echo Communications Solutions, a presentation and communication skills company based in Silicon Valley that helps people improve their presentation skills. Matt recently published the third edition of his book Speaking Up Without Freaking Out, a book written to help the millions of people who wish to present in a more confident and compelling way.

Items Mentioned in this Show:

Matt Abrahams Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Matt, thanks so much for joining us here on the How To Be Awesome At Your Job podcast.

Matthew Abrahams
Thank you. Really excited to have this conversation, Pete.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, me, too. And I was also intrigued to learn, as I was learning a bit about you, that you have a test coming up for your fifth-degree blackbelt. Now, help me think through this, sometimes like with degrees, more is higher or more is lesser, like a first-degree burn or third-degree burn, business first class. And so, what does it mean, first of all?

Matthew Abrahams
It means I’ve been doing this for a really long time is what it means.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, all right.

Matthew Abrahams
So, in this case, the higher the rank it means the more experience you have and, in theory, the more expertise you have. But as I go through this readiness process, I’m being challenged on that expertise part for sure.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, how does one pass a fifth-degree blackbelt test? What goes down during it?

Matthew Abrahams
Well, I think it means I can walk out of the room and not know. There are several things that I’m expected to be able to do both physically and, at this level, some mental stuff as well in terms of just being able to focus and manage multiple distracting things at the same time. So, it’s a grueling process but I love it and, for me, the martial arts have always helped me center myself. And what I learned inside the dojos seem to translate into my life, and sometimes it goes the other direction as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, that’s cool. So, I’m intrigued, so what physical tasks are asked of you? Is it like crushing ten boards? Or what is it?

Matthew Abrahams
Well, in my earlier days that was important but as I’ve gotten older it’s really a combination of movements that you need to do that are quite lengthy, things are formed together, movements are formed together into things that are called katas, or forms that I have to deliver, and present several of those in terms of very specific requirements. And then some physical sparring and working with other individuals to demonstrate the ability to protect myself, and that can be pretty grueling as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, have you ever had to use these skills under high-stakes circumstances?

Matthew Abrahams
I use them on a daily basis in terms of the ability to focus and feel confident in my ability. If you’re asking if I ever had to physically use these, the answer is no. There’d been some times where I’ve used my mouth instead of my fists to get out of some tricky situations but I attribute that to what I do for a job but also what I’ve learned in the martial arts.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, awesome. Cool. Well, I want to talk about what you do for a job, and so you’ve got a recent book Speaking Up Without Freaking Out which is a great title. So, tell us, what is that about and what is sort of distinctive about it?

Matthew Abrahams
Well, thank you for the opportunity to chat about it. So, the book is really designed to help people feel more comfortable and confident when they present, and to deliver presentations that are more compelling in nature. So, I, for years, was looking for a source to send my students and the people I consulted with to find techniques that could help them feel more comfortable and confident when presenting.

Most of us, 85% of us, research says, get nervous in high-stakes speaking situations, and there’s really no one stop-shop for learning techniques that were academically verified beyond practice, breathe deeply, and just do it. I call that the PB&J approach. So, after being frustrated for a long time, I went out and actually did some research, and pulled forward research I had done in graduate school and created this book which, really, is a very short book that’s designed for a student to read in a course of a week, or a business professional to read when he or she gets on a plane in San Francisco flying to New York to deliver a big presentation.

So, it’s designed really to help people get very practical skills to help them be better and more confident in their speaking.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, just to be clear, if they were flying from San Francisco to Chicago, where I am, they wouldn’t quite have enough time?

Matthew Abrahams
They could get through the whole book but maybe not the appendices. How’s that?

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Fair enough. Fair enough. That works. I just want to remind the world that we’re here, that we matter.

Matthew Abrahams
Absolutely. I was just recently in Chicago, had a great time. Took my kids, we made up our own Ferris Bueller’s Day Off tour and saw the sights. It’s fun.

Pete Mockaitis
That is good. Well, so now, I’m so intrigued. Now, I have read a number of books that have good solid advice about formulating and delivering speeches. I’m thinking about Dr. Nick Morgan’s work in particular Give Your Speech, Change The World, and we had him on back in the day. Awesome dude, awesome guest.

And so, but you’re saying that you zeroed in right upon the nerves matter – and Nick Morgan is 41, if anyone is curious, episode 41 – but you’re talking specifically about the anxious nervousness dimension. And so, can you share maybe some of your big findings that we won’t find in many other sources?

Matthew Abrahams
Well, thanks for asking, and Nick is a great guy. I’ve actually had him guest speak in my Stanford Business School class. A sharp guy and he does really, really good work. The whole effort I’ve put together here around speaking out without freaking out is driven by my students who, they would leave my classes years ago, saying, “This is all great stuff. We’ve learned how to communicate strategically and persuasively, but we’re still nervous about it.”

And that used to eat at me that we have all these tools but people weren’t feeling that they were equipped to use them because anxiety got in the way. So, this was a labor of love but also of very practical application for my students and the people I consult with. So, in my work, what I find is you have to attack anxiety with a two-pronged approach. You have to look at both the symptoms, and many of us experience many symptoms around speaking anxiety and then, also, the sources, what causes those.

So, we spent time talking in my workshops and my classes and my book about how to manage both symptoms and sources, and I believe that’s a different approach than I found elsewhere and people really resonate with it and it helps them get better. Ultimately, my goal is that everybody creates what I call an anxiety management plan, an AMP, so they get amped up about communicating rather than feel burdened by the pressures of communicating.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. I like that. So, in an anxiety management plan, what would be some of the most critical components to round it out?

Matthew Abrahams
Great. So, I’ll share some with you. So, symptomatically a lot of things happen to us physically and mentally when we get nervous around speaking. For example, if you’re like me you might blush or perspire a lot, other people shake, other people’s voice gets quivery; those are symptoms. And then for others, the source of anxiety has to do, for example, with feeling like you’re under the spotlight and everybody is evaluating you.

So, in an anxiety management plan, I have some very specific techniques that I can use for myself when I am getting up ready to speak. So, for example, when I know that I will be perspiring or perhaps blushing, simply holding something cold in the palm of your hand before you present can actually reduce your core body temperature which is really the cause of that perspiration and blushing.

It’s like when you have a fever and you put a cold compress on your forehead and that reduces your temperature. The palms of your hand work the same way, and I bet you, you in Chicago, even this week, have done this on a cold morning perhaps holding a warm cup of coffee or tea, you felt that it warms you up. We can work that in reverse, holding something cold reduces the blushing and the sweating. So, that’s part of my anxiety management plan that deals with the symptoms.

For the source of me feeling evaluated, there’s several things I can do. One that I really enjoy doing, and I encourage everybody to do, when you start a presentation, a webinar, whatever, start with some kind of interactive activity. It serves not only to get your audience engaged but it actually distracts them from focusing on you.

And in that moment of distraction, you can take a deep breath, you can look around the room and find friendly faces, there’s lots you can do, so take a poll, ask a question, show a short video. All of that serves to get your audience engaged and take their focus away from evaluating you and be on the task that they’re working on.

So, that’s an example of what an anxiety management plan is, a set of techniques that address both symptoms and sources to help you feel better.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And I really connect with that idea of giving folks something else to do because it kind of lets you take a breath such that, and say, “Okay, that’s the crowd. I’m right in front of them.” It sounds like you’re just getting sort of acclimated, like, “There they are. Here I am.” Things are happening without you being on the spotlight with the pressure to do something. Like, they’re talking amongst themselves or watching the video so that’s good.

Matthew Abrahams
That’s right. And the other thing I would just add to that is when they come back after doing whatever that task is, your role is different. You’re not the presenter but you’re the facilitator now of the experience that everybody just shared. And for many of us, being in that facilitator role, even for a brief bit, makes us feel more comfortable, so it’s an on-ramp to the presenting piece.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, fantastic. And I know you were just offering one example as a tip, but I got to go there. When it comes to the holding something cold, is it beneficial to hold it in anywhere particular? Like, could you strap a frozen gel pack to your back, or your thigh, or your…?

Matthew Abrahams
No, it’s very specific to the palms of your hands.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Matthew Abrahams
So, the palms of the hands are much like the back of the neck and the forehead are temperature control setting places for the body. So, think of them as thermostats. And, in fact, the research that I did to find this particular technique comes from athletics. One of the things that degrades athletic performance is the athlete gets overheated.

So, if there’s a way you can cool down while you’re doing your sport, you’ll actually be able to persist longer. And so, that got me thinking, “Well, a lot of athletes, what they’ll do is they’ll hold something cold in their hands, and we can do the same in speaking.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. To recap, we got the palm, the neck, and where?

Matthew Abrahams
The forehead.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Palms, neck, forehead.

Matthew Abrahams
But you’re not going to strap an ice pack to your head, Pete, when you’re giving a presentation, but you could hold a glass of water before you start speaking.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, you could have a subtle something on the back of your neck, you know, if you’re not turning.

Matthew Abrahams
Well, with all the high-tech microphones and stuff, I would worry about shorting out, and that’s electrocuting and stuff.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, man, there’s a nightmare that we’ve just planted in everyone’s psyche. Oh, boy. Okay. And so, then, now more so than the wrist because I’ve seen that they’ve even made some high-tech device that kind of chills your wrist. Do we count that as part of the palm or is that separate and different?

Matthew Abrahams
I didn’t know we were doing anatomy here, Pete.

Pete Mockaitis
I would go there, Matt.

Matthew Abrahams
But if people can find the tool that works for them, and it’s on their wrists, I’m totally cool with it. But what I’m hoping people would do is find some things they can do to help reduce some of the physical symptoms that they feel but also that they show to others. And it’s typically easier, I think, to hold a cold bottle of water or a cold glass of water than some high-tech gizmo on your wrist. But if that gizmo works, go for it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Understood. Yes. So, those are a couple of examples then in terms of handling a source and the symptoms. So, I’d love it if you could share with us sort of like the 80-20 or the greatest hits in terms of common sources of anxiety and pro tip solutions to address them. And then, after you hit the sources, let’s hit some more of the symptoms.

Matthew Abrahams
Sure thing. I’ll give you one more of each, and if you want more I’ll give you more. One of the things that makes people very anxious has to do with, and this is a source, is that we’re worried about the potential negative future consequences of what we’re doing. Let me break that down. When you give a presentation you have a goal in mind.

If you’re one of the entrepreneurs I coach or teach, you want funding or advice. If you’re one of my students, you want a good grade. If you’re a manager in an organization, you’re worried about not getting the headcount or the support for your task at hand. If you’re a community member, you might have a strong position you’re bringing up at some local governmental event, and you’re afraid people won’t hear you.

So, what makes us nervous is that we won’t succeed in the goal we’re trying to achieve, so we’re worried about a potential outcome, negative outcomes that’s in the future. A great way to counteract that is to become very present-oriented, in the moment. You and others might have heard of this notion of flow experience or wrapped attention. It’s when you’re in the immediate present. And when you’re in the immediate present you are not worried about the potential negative future outcomes.

And there are lots of things presenters/communicators can do to get themselves in the present moment. Everything from taking a walk around the building, moving your body gets you out of your head, you can count backwards from a very complicated number, so start at a hundred and count backwards by 17s, that’s challenging. It forces you to be in the present moment.

Listen to a song or a playlist like athletes do, that gets you in the present moment. Or do what I do. My favorite way to get present-oriented is to say tongue twisters. The only way to say a tongue twister right it to be immediately focused on what you’re saying. So, the source has to do with worrying about potential negative future outcomes, and the way to manage it is to become present-oriented, and that helps a lot of people.

Now, in terms of other symptoms that people experience, a lot of people get shaky before they speak. That’s the adrenaline from the fight or flight response that’s coursing through our bodies. And if you start your communication with big broad gestures, nothing that looks over-theatrical but just big gestures, like, “Welcome, people,” and extend both your arms as if you’re welcoming somebody into your home.

By using those big muscles you actually allow that adrenaline to dissipate, and you stop shaking as much as you were. So, that’s a symptomatic relief, whereas where I stated before about becoming present-oriented, it relieves a particular source of anxiety.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, got you. Thank you. Well, so now, we talk about big sweeping gestures, I got to get your take on power posing. What do you think?

Matthew Abrahams
So, power posing is really, really interesting stuff and, in fact, Amy Cuddy, who’s been the biggest champion of that, has the third most popular TED Talk ever talking about it. There is some recent debate in terms of how it actually works and its efficacy, but I’ve seen it work with many people I’ve coached.

So, just to review, power posing is this notion of taking a big balanced still stance, Amy Cuddy refers to the Superman or the Wonder Woman pose, with your hands on your hips, and your legs splayed out a little bit. And the idea is that when you take a big stance, not only does your audience see you as more confident, but you yourself begin to feel more confident because you’re releasing testosterone and other hormones that make you feel that way.

So, I’m a proponent of that. Again, you don’t do that necessarily in front of the audience. You might do that in the privacy of a bathroom stall or cubicle or office, but that can really help. If nothing else, it helps ground you and helps you focus on what you’re about to do, and there’s evidence that that helps people feel more confident too.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Very cool. Well, so then, I’d like to maybe zoom out a little bit. We talked about having the anxiety management plan associated with sort of right there, sort of in the heat of the moment, or just before the moment. I’d like to maybe go back a tiny little bit farther in terms of if folks just have some negative or disempowering self-defeating beliefs or habits or behavior that you see that are problematic and troublesome. What are some of those things that we can stop doing or start doing sort of well in advance of the clutch moment in order to perform well?

Matthew Abrahams
Let me share two answers in response to that. The first it has to do with procrastination. A lot of people procrastinate around presenting because it makes them feel bad, it makes them nervous, so they think, “Why should I feel nervous in preparing and worrying about this presentation? So, I’m just not going to do it.” And, clearly, that sets them up for failure or at least mediocrity.

One of the problems of procrastination is it has a built-in reinforcement. If you procrastinate and then give a poor presentation or run a poor meeting you can always say to yourself, “Well, if I just would’ve spent more time, it would’ve gone better,” so it builds in this validation of it. So, the best thing to do when it comes to managing procrastination is to publicly commit to a schedule, and then build in rewards for yourself as you achieve those milestones.

So, you would create a plan for yourself and publicly commit to it. That could be posting it on your Instagram feed. It could be putting it on the family refrigerator, or posting it in your cube at work so other people can see it. And that public commitment tends to lead people to achieve what’s on the list, and then reward yourself.

So, as you succeed in those steps, give yourself some kind of reward, perhaps it’s listening to your favorite podcast, or perhaps it’s eating a bit of a chocolate chip cookie, or whatever. But as you achieve those steps, reward yourself and that makes it self-reinforcing in a positive direction. So, one bad habit people have is procrastination, and the way to manage it is public commitment and to reward or reinforce when you succeed.

The other thing that people tend to do is they tend to envision communication as performance. I bet you your listeners, and, Pete, yourself, you’ve probably done one of these four things. You’ve probably done some acting, singing, dancing or played a sport, and most of the people listening in have done one or more of those.

And in each one of those activities, it is performance-based. There’s a right way to do it and a wrong way to do it. If you’re an actor and you misspeak your line in the wrong way at the wrong time, you screwed up, you did it wrong. If you’re an athlete, and you don’t do what your sport requires at the right time or the right way, you’ve done it wrong. In fact, some sports keep track of the mistakes you make.

We bring that same mentality, that same approach to communication, to presenting. We feel like there’s one right way to do it. I’ve been doing this work for a long, long time, over two decades, and I’m here to tell you and everybody listening, there is no right way to communicate. There are better ways and worse ways. So, if we can lose that view of communication and presenting as performance, it can actually help us.

And one great way to do it is to see communication not as performing but as conversation. Most people are not nervous when they converse. If you can envision your speaking as a conversation it can really help. So, procrastination and this performance anxiety really do weigh heavy on people and negatively influence their ability to communicate.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, performance anxiety, that’s intriguing. So, you’re saying that that will spiral into creating more anxiety because it’s like, “I have to do it this precise way like my favorite TED Talker does.”

Matthew Abrahams
Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
Indeed. And so, that’s what’s intriguing there is that you say there are better ways and there are worse ways, and I think that it’s sort of like, I guess, there are some universals and then there are some pieces that work better for some audiences instead of others. And so, I guess, I’m thinking there are some levels of black and white, I would say, and lots and lots of grey. Would you agree with that? Would you say, “No, there’s no black and white, Pete”?

Matthew Abrahams
I would frame it differently. I would say that there’s some fundamentals that everybody needs to learn. And these foundational pieces of advice or guidance hold true in a vast majority of situations. And then once we understand those fundamentals, it’s all about choice. It’s about choosing to comply with them, or conform with them, or deviate from them, but what I’ve seen in my work, in my teaching and in my consulting, is that people often communicate out of habit and not out of choice.

So, what I see my job being is really helping people understand what these foundational ideas are and then helping them make choices based on their goal and the audience they’re speaking to and the modality they’re communicating through. Is it a webinar versus in person, etcetera? So, if we’re saying the same thing, and I fully agree with you. If what I said is slightly different then perhaps I disagree with you.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yes, I think we’re on the same page there, and I’m buying that. And it’s intriguing, I’m thinking back to we had Anshul Bhagi in Episode 24, and he helped co-create Ummo, this voice-coaching app which is pretty cool. And so, he was saying that vocal pauses can be a deliberate choice. For instance, I thought that was really intriguing in that if a person has zero vocal pauses, the uhhs, ohhs, uhms, then that can almost seem freakish and unnatural and rehearsed and robotic.

Like, “You’re not a real person, and we’re not really having a conversation because real people don’t talk the way you’re talking right now, free of a single uhm to be had.” Which I thought was pretty intriguing because in Toastmasters and other context, it’s like, “Oh, we count them and we want to eliminate them.” But that’s a place where there is room for deviance and maybe a sweet spot. I just did one. Hopefully, that seemed natural.

Matthew Abrahams
You seem so natural, Pete. It’s amazing. We know now that you’re not a robot. That’s good.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m not a robot. Cool. So, I dig that. And then, understood. But just knowing that there’s a wide latitude of right and good I think is so handy. And I’ve seen that when I’ve coached, say, people who are prepping for strategy consulting firm case interviews.

Matthew Abrahams
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
And I’ve seen sort of a similar view in terms of they get so freaked out, “I want to do it just perfectly because this is my career dream.” And I say, “Well, really? We’re sort of assessing how well you think and communicate, and there are many right ways to do that, and there are better ways and there are worse ways, and in over-fixating on using ‘perfect’ structure or framework to start the interview, you’re not going to do so well because you freak yourself out and don’t let your natural brain do its thing.”

Matthew Abrahams
Absolutely. There’s a wonderful saying from the world of improvisation that I like to share with people, and I do this with my MBA students at Stanford, and I suck the air out of a room when I say it. But in improv they have this wonderful saying, “Dare to be dull.” And I get up in front of a bunch of Stanford MBAs and proclaim that, and they’re shocked because they’ve never heard that in their life.

But the motivation behind that statement is we put so much pressure on ourselves to be great that we actually preclude ourselves from actually achieving greatness. And if we just target getting the job done, just focus on the task at hand, that frees up all of those cognitive resources we’re investing in doing it right and doing it great to actually achieve that greatness.

So, I love this notion of dare to be dull. Do what’s needed, get it done, and when you put yourself in that mindset you can actually then achieve great things.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Good. Well, now, let’s get your view of maybe you are feeling nervous but you just don’t want other people to know it. So, are there any particular sort of non-verbal things that one can do to seem like you are confident and feeling awesome?

Matthew Abrahams
There are several things we can do to portray confidence even if we’re not feeling that way. So, let me suggest a few and we’ll start at the bottom of the body and work our way up and, don’t worry, we’ll skip certain parts. But one of the big signs that signals anxiety is random or spurious movement; rocking, swaying, shaking.

And so, it’s all about being still. So, it has to do with your foot position very simply. A lot of people, when they stand to speak, they rock or sway side to side. In fact, it’s very self-soothing. You know how little kids suck their thumbs? Adults sway side to side to help calm themselves down. And if you and your listeners don’t believe that’s true, I challenge you to go to the Department of Motor Vehicles or the Post Office when it’s very busy and everybody is frustrated being there, you’ll see them all swaying and perhaps swearing under their breath.

It’s a way that we calm ourselves down. But when somebody sees you swaying and rocking and shifting, they see you as somebody who’s nervous, who doesn’t want to be there, who’s very uncomfortable. So, if you can still yourself, and we do this in many ways, by lining our body up properly. If you put your feet so they’re parallel underneath your shoulders, rather than splayed out to the side like many of us stand, it actually roots you to the ground better and you actually will sway less. So, one thing we can do is really still our bodies.

The other thing that we need to do is, when it comes to our gesturing, we need to make sure that we have our arms in an open position rather than crossed in front of our chest or up high with our elbows pinned close to our body. That looks very defensive. Nervous people make themselves very defensive. If you watch your most favorite keynote presenter, a TED Talk speaker, whomever, you’ll see that their gestures are expanded and that they’re very open, and that’s a way of signaling confidence.

And then, finally, it has to do with eye contact. Our eyes dart around a lot when we’re nervous. There’s been some research that says one of the thing we’re looking for is exits so if things go bad we know how to get out. But we need to focus our eyes, and I don’t mean stare, and I don’t mean glare, but if your eyes dart around a lot, if there’s a way you can slow them down and focus on a few other people in the room or even a few quadrants of the room, if you look at the room and divide it into quadrants, look in the back corner or in the front center, whatever, that can help us well.

So, those are some things that we can do so that we appear more confident. Confident people do those things. They stand in a balanced way without spurious movements, they gesture in an open fashion rather than closed, and their eye contact is connective rather than disjointed and distracting.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Now, I want to talk about eye contact because this gets so tricky, I think, for folks, and I have heard a number of recommendations associated with you want to make X seconds or half a sentence or a full sentence of eye contact with a person, and then move on. And so, if you’re thinking about, well, maybe take two contexts.

One, a big old presentation with 80 people in the room and, two, sort of a more intimate conference room with eight people in the room, and you’re presenting. What would be your take on, is there an optimal amount of eye contact to make with the person before moving on? Or how do you think about doing that just right?

Matthew Abrahams
This is the second most prevalent question I get asked.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, intriguing. Well, you know the question I’m asking next, but let’s hear the answer first.

Matthew Abrahams
Yeah, yeah, well, I set myself up for that. So, I have a completely unsatisfactory answer for you, Pete, and I’m really sorry. But the answer is this, you want to look long enough but not too long.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, perfect.

Matthew Abrahams
Because it really depends. It really depends. When you look at somebody too long, you know; they turn away, they blush. Others in the room might start shifting and moving because you’re not paying attention to them. It’s more art than science. I work with a lot of technologists, a lot of scientists, and they want me to say, “Look at people for 1.3 milliseconds each, and then you’ve done your job.” And it’s not that way.

In a smaller venue, you should look at as many as the people as you can in a non-pattern way. I am not a big fan of the one-phrase one-person mentality because your phrases aren’t all of equal length and then it becomes patterned and your keys become rhythmic because you’re shifting from one person to the next. That’s not how we converse.

In a larger venue, this quadrant idea I mentioned earlier works best. So, I don’t look at everybody in a particular region or quadrant; I look at one or two people. But by virtue, in a larger room, of looking at everybody on one corner, or in front of me, it gives everybody that love. It’s connective with everybody in that area.

So, the idea is to make it as natural as possible. If you would watch how people, and there are people who do this with retinal scanning behavior or machines, watch people at conversations. It’s not patterned, it’s not equal time. We’re trying to mimic that kind of behavior. So, I wish I had better, more specific advice, but the best thing to do is to not be patterned and to really try to connect and go with the feeling you get when you look at somebody and you feel like, “Okay, I’ve made that connection. Now I’ll move on.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, not as satisfactory, I’m with you. I like that it’s paradigm shifting, in that sense it is satisfactory. But in terms of pinning it down to a number, yeah, I’m with you there that it’s not as satisfactory because there is no perfect prescription. Nonetheless, if I could press you a bit, if you would say, “Hey, Pete, most of the time the eye contact amount is probably going to be more than X sentences or words and less than Y sentences or words. Very roughly most of the time exceptions abound.” What would those numbers be?

Matthew Abrahams
I’m not going to let you put me in a corner, Pete, because I don’t know those numbers, and I don’t know that anybody does. What I will tell you from research is, and this is in an interpersonal setting and you can extrapolate perhaps to larger venues. In an interpersonal setting, when you and I are speaking face-to-face, as the speaker, I look at you roughly 40% of the time. You, as the listener, are expected to look at me roughly 60% of the time.

So, that is to say, if you are listening to me, and we’re face-to-face, and I don’t look at you for at least 40% of the time that we are talking, you will think I am distracted and not connected to you. Similarly, while I am speaking, I am monitoring, you’re looking at me. If you’re not looking at me roughly 60% of the time then I’m going to feel that you’re not listening and we’re no connected.

So, those are numbers that have been borne out in research and I’m happy to share with you. How that translates into when you’re in an audience is two-fold. One, you don’t need to be looking at your audience and staring at people 100% of the time. However, you will need to do it more than 40% just because you’re not one-to-one face-to-face. Hope that helps. I can’t tell you the number of sentences or words to speak while looking.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, no, it’s all good. I love that you’re a man of integrity holding to the truth. And so, well, here’s, I guess, in my world that’s kind of – I just want to get your reading while I have you here – it tends to be somewhere between, for me, half to one and a half sentences, it just feels about right in terms of it might be. And so, that works for me.

It’s interesting because, you’re right, I think it really does vary even person by person in the audience in terms of how much eye contact they can handle, in terms of like three seconds freak some people out, like, “Whoa, dude.” And then, for others, it’s almost like you’re disappointing them when you move on so soon. And so, I mean, I know I played hardball trying to pin you some numbers but I’m right with you in that I see a whole lot of variability.

Matthew Abrahams
Right. And what I have found is if you give people heuristics like that, they end up fixating on the number of words they’re speaking and they’re not worried about, they’re not actually connecting to the audience, so I’m not a big fan of 30 seconds per slide, two sentences per person, because what you get, especially with very technical scientifically-oriented people, is they’re counting those things, and when they’re counting they’re not connecting, and they’re worse off than had they just done what came naturally.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Cool. Well, I love that we went there. It’s such a depth. That’s cool. I don’t get to do this with very many people in very many context, and maybe you don’t either because of the soundbite culture we live in, so I enjoyed that detour. Hope you did as well.

Matthew Abrahams
Thank you.

Pete Mockaitis
You know, I’ve got to ask, what’s the number one question you’re asked most often?

Matthew Abrahams
What do I do with my hands? That’s the number one question.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, what do you do?

Matthew Abrahams
So, let me give two bits of advice – what to do with your hands when you’re not using them, and then what to do when you are using them. So, when you’re not using your hands, we want to see them. We don’t want them in our pockets, we don’t want them behind our back. If we’re sitting at a table, we want them on the table not under the table.

But simply down by your sides as you would stand perhaps, if you went to the tailor and they’re trying fit a jacket on you, not when you splay your hands out like a T, the letter T. But when they’re down by the sides, that’s a great relaxed position and it’s a very confident position because you’re very open.

The other place where people feel most comfortable is just lightly clasping your hands in front of your abdomen, right in front of your belly button, just loose and low, that’s fine. We don’t want to go below the belt. That turns into what I call figgly thing and that makes you look a little nervous and uncomfortable. So, those are two great places to rest your hands when you’re not using them; down by your sides or right in front of your belly button.

When you gesture, the rules are really simple; gesture beyond your shoulders. A lot of us when we gesture, we gesture with our elbows tight to our body, and our hands in front of our chest. We look like T-rex dinosaurs and we look very defensive. If you can extend your arms just a little bit, just beyond your shoulders with the palms facing your audience, you look much more open.

And then the other gesture is when you refer to your audience, the people you’re talking about. Do a forward extension towards them. When you say words like us, you, we. Having your hands extended forward really makes you look like you’re connecting with and talking to your audience. So, again, I’m about frameworks and fundamentals. I’m not about scripting a gesture here or there because it looks artificial and, again, it distracts you from connecting with your audience if you have to think, “On this word I must move my hand in this way.”

Pete Mockaitis
Totally.

Matthew Abrahams
That’s the advice I give to people, and people really grasp onto it and begin making decisions that show their body posture as being more open and confident.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, that’s great. And what’s interesting for me is I notice when you put out those two postures to go with, I find that I most naturally put my hands in front of my abdomen, and in a way it really is kind of soothing. And I don’t know if there’s some primordial stuff about that being a sensitive part of my body or an attack might get me hurt or what.

So, I do find that more soothing. Whereas on the sides is just a little bit more nervous when you’re staring down hundreds of people. And so, I don’t know where I heard this but I heard that if you have anything like a lectern, podium – I always get them mixed up and so the rest of the world – or your hands in front of your midsection, then that creates a bit of maybe a subconscious signaling of protection or kind of there’s a barrier in between audience and communicator.

Do you buy that? And do you think like the other stance of hands to the sides is, if you could muster it, superior to hands in front of your abdomen?

Matthew Abrahams
So, I think either can accomplish the goal of helping you look confident and helping many people be comfortable. I believe that when your hands are down by the side, you’re actually more exposed. And, by virtue of being more exposed, or willing to be more exposed, in front of others, you actually display more confidence so that’s why I don’t like lecterns, podiums because they act as a shield for you.

Confident speakers are willing to stand in front of an audience with their arms down. Now, I’m not saying you stand there rigidly for a long period of time, but if you’re being introduced, or if somebody is asking you a question, and you’re waiting for that question to come in, placing those arms down by the side just make you look so confident.

That said, putting the hands in front of the abdomen, personally I don’t feel diminishes your confidence that much. I know of no research that focuses on the relative difference between these two postures. These are usually the go-to postures. They are recommended instead of being defensive or behind a lectern and podium.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, Matt, this is so much good detailed stuff. Tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we shift gears and hear about some of your favorite things?

Matthew Abrahams
So, just a couple things. We’ve talked a lot about nerves, and we’ve talked a lot about what we can do. I’d like to just mention something that is very, very critical. And that is, as a communicator, your job is to be in service of your audience. You’re there to help them, to provide them with information, etcetera, so one of the things that can help you become more confident and comfortable is just remind yourself that you’re there for them.

It’s not that the audience is there to judge and evaluate you, but you’re in service of them, so you really have to spend some times doing some reflection and reconnaissance to best understand what your audience needs from you. So, all effective communication, I believe, starts from this perspective of you as a communicator, be it a meeting leader, a manager, a keynote speaker, whatever, is to be in service of your audience.

So, that’s one important point, Pete, that I think really underlies all of this when it comes to becoming more confident in your communication.

Pete Mockaitis
Excellent. Thank you. Well, now, could you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Matthew Abrahams
So, the first time I heard this quote, and I have to admit I’ve been lazy and I don’t know who actually said it, but I heard it in the movie Buckaroo Banz ai, so I am now dating myself to let everybody know how old I am. But the quote is, “No matter where you go there you are.” And that quote, to me, is really impactful because part of what we need to do in any communication – and I would argue in our life in general – is be very present.

And it’s very easy in this age of technology and over-abundance of information to get very distracted very easily, so that quote is really important to me. No matter where you go, there you are. Make the best of it. Be present and attune to what’s going on around you.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I’m sorry. What did you say? I had a text. Oh, just kidding.

Matthew Abrahams
It was me texting you. Be present.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, be present. That’s good. Cool. And how about a favorite study or experiment or bit of research, something you really jive with?

Matthew Abrahams
So, I have two favorite research studies. I’ll share one and if you want me to share the other I’ll share it as well. So, it has to do with the power of language and how framing things in a positive way is much more motivational and persuasive. They went to two sets of people exactly identical, and they said, “We’re very sorry to tell you, you have a very bad disease, and the outcome is not likely to be good. We happen to have an experimental treatment that has a 67% failure rate. Would you like to take it?”

They immediately went to another group of people, exactly the same like that first group, and they said, “You’ve got this terrible disease, sorry to tell you this. There happens to be a potential treatment. It has a 33% success rate. Would you like to take it?” Doing the quick math, you’ll understand very quickly they said the same thing mathematically.

However, the people who heard it framed as a success rate were much more willing to take it than the people who heard the same thing as a failure rate. I find that fascinating that linguistically, the words we use to describe things can influence people very, very easily. So, that’s one of my favorite studies.

Pete Mockaitis
You know, that was so good, I do want to hear the other one.

Matthew Abrahams
So, the other one has to do with non-verbal persuasions. So, they called people into a lab and they said, “We’re testing your auditory acuity, in other words how well you hear. Every time you hear one beep, nod your head up and down. Every time you hear two beeps, nod your head side to side.” What they then did, that wasn’t the study. What they did is varied how many one beeps and two beeps people heard.

The subject came outside of the lab, sat next to somebody they thought was going into the lab next. It turned out that person sitting next to them was a confederate of the experimenter, and that person asked to borrow some money of the subject. The subjects who heard one beep, in other words nodded their head up and down, much more frequently gave them the money for the soda than the people who nodded their head side to side. In other words, if we can get people to change their non-verbal behavior, we can actually influence their willingness to behave in a certain way. I find that study fascinating.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, that is fascinating. Thank you. And how about a favorite book?

Matthew Abrahams
Oh, I have so many favorite books. My favorite book, I’m thinking what’s on my nightstand right now. It’s a book on improv, and what I like about it is it really relates to how we can just apply improv skills to our daily life. It’s by Patricia Madson, and it’s called Improv Wisdom. And I’m a big fan of improvisation because of the communication skills it teaches, and her book does the great way of applying those skills just to day-to-day life, so I’m a big fan of Patricia Madson’s Improv Wisdom book.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, it’s so interesting, when I was researching on Amazon, it is frequently bought together with your book.

Matthew Abrahams
Yes, it is. And there’s a reason for that. So, I co-teach a class at Stanford with an improv expert, not Patricia herself, but somebody who studied under Patricia, and his name is Adam Tobin. And Adam and I teach a class where we actually apply and we use improv to teach tricky communication skills, so our students tend to buy those two books together.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, there it is. Yeah, now we know the rest of the story behind the Amazon recommendation. Cool.

Matthew Abrahams
And going along without getting into too much detail, Pete, there you go.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I like it. Okay. Cool. And how about a favorite tool, something that helps you be awesome at your job?

Matthew Abrahams
A favorite tool of mine. So, on my cellphone I rely, beyond relying on my scheduling app, I have several apps, you mentioned one, Ummo, that help with my communication skills. So, there are several apps that help with communication in terms of just fluency, vocal variation, etcetera, and those tools really help me personally but they also are very useful for the students I teach and the folks I consult with.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, please share names. What are the other apps?

Matthew Abrahams
So, there’s one called Orai, O-R-A-I, and another one called LikeSo, because so many people say Like and So when they communicate. But Ummo, Orai and LikeSo are apps that I use a lot and I refer people to all the time.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. And is there a particular nugget that you share that seems to really connect and resonate with folks and they play it back to you often?

Matthew Abrahams
Beyond the anxiety management plan, and I have had students come back to me from 10, 15 years ago, telling me they’re still using their anxiety management plan. One of my mantras is that communication is goal-driven, and you need to make sure you understand your goals in any high-stakes communication. And, to me, a goal has three parts: what do you want your audience to know, what do you want them to feel, and what do you want them to do. And I have students, consulting clients all the time come back to me and say it’s all about the no feel and do. It’s a very important mantra and very important bit of advice.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. And do you have a favorite habit?

Matthew Abrahams
My favorite habit, since we’re ending our interview, I’ll bring us back to the beginning. I have a very short tai chi set or routine that I do every morning when I wake up and it just helps me get focused and gets me ready for the day.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, Matt, where would you point them?

Matthew Abrahams
I would point you to two places. The consulting practice I run is called Bold Echo, I co-founded this a number of years ago, it’s B-O-L-D-E-C-H-O.com, as well as a website I curate called No Freaking Speaking, and that website is designed to help people feel more comfortable and confident in their communication. So, again, it’s No Freaking Speaking and BoldEcho.com.

Pete Mockaitis
No Freaking Speaking reminds me of like a plumber commercial. It’s like, “Faucet leaking got you freaking?” And so, free associating.

Matthew Abrahams
You know what, Pete, you’re going to be my new PR, my new PR department.

Pete Mockaitis
“Your speaking got you freaking? Call Matt.” Cool. And, speaking of marketing, do you have a final challenge or call to action you’d issue here to folks seeking to be awesome at their jobs?

Matthew Abrahams
I do, indeed. I believe everybody has something important to contribute, a story to tell, advice to give, and we have to feel comfortable and confident with our communication in order to do that. So, I challenge everybody, as we speak we are before the New Year, take on as a New Year evolution, or resolution, whatever you see it as, as really addressing any issues you have around communication by addressing anxiety, by practicing and honing skills you already have. You can contribute to the world by sharing your story, sharing your information, and you’re going to have a lot more fun doing it.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, fun, indeed. Yes, Matt, this has been tons of fun. I wish you lots of luck with your courses and your work and your clients and improv hilarity and all that you’re up to.

Matthew Abrahams
Thank you so much, Pete. I’ve enjoyed chatting with you. Thank you so much.

248: What Professional Speakers Do…that You Should too with Grant Baldwin

By | Podcasts | No Comments

 

 

Grant Baldwin says: "Your slide should be an enhancement not a replacement for your talk."

Professional speaking guru Grant Baldwin shares lessons learned for becoming a better public speaker.

You’ll Learn:

  1. The one thing that distinguishes professional speakers from the rest
  2. Top things NOT to do when presenting
  3. Helpful ways to make a huge upgrade to your presentation skills

About Grant 

Grant is a veteran speaker who started his public speaking career as a youth pastor. Since then, he has given thousands of presentations in conferences, assemblies, conventions, and other events.  He is the host of The Speaker Lab, a podcast that helps other speakers start, build, and grow their business.

Items Mentioned in this Show:

Grant Baldwin Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Grant, thanks so much for joining us here on the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.

Grant Baldwin
Pete, it’s like Christmas morning waking up, looking at the calendar and saying, “Today I get to talk to Pete,” and it’s here, the moment has arrived. And it’s like accepting an Academy Award or something.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, you probably say that to all your interviewers.

Grant Baldwin
You know what, you can go back to all of them. I don’t know that I’ve ever said that.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to chat with you, boy, because we met years ago when you generously volunteered to speak at my HOBY, Hugh O’Brian Youth Leadership, seminar back in Champaign-Urbana, and I’ve just been watching you from afar.

Grant Baldwin
How many years ago was that?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, it is in the ballpark of ten.

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, I would say eight to ten.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, so I’ve just been watching you from afar with your podcast and what you’ve been doing, and I said, “Well, hey, wait a second. I think there’s a fit here.” So, I want to dig into a lot of the learnings that you have developed and shared with all of your clients through The Speaker Lab.

Grant Baldwin
Okay. Hang on. Hang on. Hang on. Before we do that, I just did a quick search. I couldn’t help myself. June of 2009.

Pete Mockaitis
2009, yeah.

Grant Baldwin
There you go.

Pete Mockaitis
Eight and a half. Wow. And good organization.

Grant Baldwin
Well, I remember it’s a fun event.

Pete Mockaitis
Plus, the title is a pretty searchable keyword that won’t trip too many other things.

Grant Baldwin
It’s in the archives.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Cool. So, yeah, I want to chat about some of your insights discovered and shared with your Speaker Lab clientele. But, first, I thought every speaker has a pretty wild story when it comes to their travel and their mishaps. Could you share with us one of your most hilariously awesome tales or a tale that comes from one of the speakers you worked with?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, so I’ll give you both. I’ll give you both quickly. So, one that happened to me, I remember, several years ago was I was speaking at an event in Colorado and flying from Denver to Chicago, and then was going to, once I get into Chicago, had something like a two-hour drive into somewhere in Illinois or, I don’t know, what would that be, Eastern Iowa.

And so, I was in Denver and a big blizzard, snowstorm or something comes blowing in and it’s just dumping snow and we’re on the plane, the plane is delayed, delayed, delayed, delayed. So, they’re finally get ready to take off, and at this point it is something like 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning. And so, by the time I land in Chicago it’s like 5:00 or 6:00 in the morning, got to drive a couple of hours, so I haven’t really slept.

And I remember just being in a daze of driving a couple of hours, getting to the venue, and I remember being like delirious, like brushing my teeth in the parking lot of the venue where I was getting ready to speak, and just feeling trashed and exhausted, and just feeling like, “You know, this is the glamorous life of a speaker.” So, yeah, a few of those type of war stories have happened a few times.

Pete Mockaitis
But, if I may, I got to push for the ending. How did the speech go? And what did the clients say? And did you collect your money?

Grant Baldwin
It went well. It went well. In fact, I was supposed to give two talks, and there was something of a break in between, and so I asked, I said, “Hey, if it’s okay I need to go back to the hotel and just zonk for a little bit, and then for the second talk I’m going to be in much better shape,” and they generously let me do that, and it went great. Yeah, it went fine. It worked out well.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. Heroics when it comes to the toothbrushing in the parking lot? It reminds me once I was doing some consulting and we were eating cereal from a vending machine out of a Styrofoam cup with a plastic spork while wearing a hairnet in a cookie factory, I’m like, “This is the glamorous life.”

Grant Baldwin
This is the life. Exactly. This is the part that nobody gets to see.

Pete Mockaitis
Right. Okay. So that’s yours. You said you had one of the clients too.

Grant Baldwin
Yes. This wasn’t a client but a friend of mine, but they’re speaking at something and they go to check in at the hotel, and I guess there was some type of a guy on the hunt, manhunt going on in the area for some criminal for something. So, friend of mine checks into the hotel, and he looks like the dude apparently, whoever this criminal was.

So. gets to his room, a few minutes later the phone rings, and it is the front desk, or, no, excuse me, it’s the police, and they’re like, “Hey, it’s the police and we’re outside your door. You need to come out.” And he’s thinking like, “Yeah, whatever. It’s a joke. Someone is pranking me.” Hangs up the phone. A couple of minutes they call back, and they’re like seriously come at the door, people were banging on the door.

He opens the door, looks down like each end of the hallway is SWAT team, barking dogs, guns drawn, like the works.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes.

Grant Baldwin
And just total case of mistaken identity there, but he’s just like, “I’m traumatized.” So, there’s that side of it, too, which seems much more mentally and emotionally damaging thing than having to brush your teeth in a parking lot.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes. Thank you. You really delivered on that. I thought, “Okay, I hope we have a good travel story.” And I cannot conceive of a better one.

Grant Baldwin
It’s pretty rough.

Pete Mockaitis
SWAT teams and being surrounded beats, “I was really delayed on a flight, and it was bad.” So, thank you for bringing that. So, now, can you share with us, okay, The Speaker Lab, what’s it all about? What are you trying to do there?

Grant Baldwin
So, I was a full-time speaker for about seven, eight years or so, and a lot in the education space was doing anywhere from 50 to 70 events a year, and had a lot of people who asked me about speaking. A lot of people were intrigued, “Hey, how do I become a speaker? How do I get into this?” And so, we started doing a couple of different online trainings around this subject and topic, and just found there’s a lot of people that teach the art side, the presentation side, “Here’s how you put together a good talk. Here’s how you make a good presentation. Here’s how you put your slides together and all that stuff.” But there wasn’t a lot of people that were teaching the business side.
Yeah, but how do you actually find a gig? How do know how much to charge? How do you know how to take care and work with a client? And so, we started to put together some trainings around that, and that’s a lot of what we do today is we do a free podcast and then we also have various trainings and coaching opportunities, and basically just help people create and build a plan and a step-by-step system for how to consistently find and book speaking engagements.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. That’s cool. Well, so, and I would like to dig into, in fact, the art of speaking itself more so for this conversation as it’s applicable to our audience of professionals employed in various places. So, I guess I’m intrigued to see, when you’re working with folks, what do you see most commonly as the differentiator between someone who is like, “Okay, yeah, they’re decent at speaking,” to, “Oh, I’m looking at a professional here,” when it comes to their delivery? Could you sort of paint that picture for what makes the difference?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, I think one of the big things that makes a difference, and something that anyone could do, is a lot of it comes down to the preparation and the practice or the rehearsal that they put into it. And I think oftentimes there’s this misconception that the best speakers in the world just get up on stage and they just make it up and they just wing it and shoot from the hip, and it all just naturally comes out, and you’re like, “They’re just naturally good.”

And, yeah, there are some maybe level of natural charisma that some people may have, but at the same time the best speakers on the planet spend an enormous amount of time really going over the material, really learning it, refining it, and practicing it, and rehearsing and preparing so by the time they get up on stage it looks natural, it looks like they’re just making it up, it looks like they’re just winging, when it’s something they’ve really spent a lot of time on.

So, I think that’s an easy thing for anybody in any type of context, whether you want to be a professional speaker or someone who, “I’ve got to give two or three presentations a year in my company or my business or some type of local organization or civic group,” just spending the time to really work on your material and to practice it and go over it makes a huge, huge difference.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s so good. Now, what comes to mind for me is a comedian. They make it look so natural, “Oh, they’re so funny. They just have all these jokes that are great.” But behind the scenes they’ve been testing them and used many jokes that didn’t work and bombed and embarrassed themselves at smaller venues. And so there it is, the practice and the rehearsals happening behind the scenes.

So, I know the number is going to vary wildly but maybe just if you imagine a context in which, “Hey, we’ve got this professional who has maybe a 30-minute chunk of an important presentation to be delivered in a conference room maybe to a combined set of stakeholders from some executives to some partners that the company works with.” Could you maybe lay it out for us, like what is the price of excellence? Is it like for an hour? Or is it 50 hours? Is it 500 hours?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, so one of the things that you touched on there is some of it depends on the stakes and the context of the setting, meaning that, let’s say, for example, you’ve got to give a 30-minute talk to some friends and it’s kind of a casual type of setting. Yeah, you’re probably going to spend less time on it versus like you’re pitching some type of business or idea or opportunity, and this is like make or break for your career, you’re probably going to spend a lot more time on it.

So, I don’t know that there’s necessarily a right or wrong answer, but typically the higher the stake the more time you’re going to put into it. So, I can kind of walk you through, this will be helpful, like how I would go about preparing for something like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, let’s hear it.

Grant Baldwin
The bigger the stakes for the type of event, I typically start with, well, I’ll do a couple just for some more context. If I’m speaking at something, I typically want to use material that I’ve given before, that I’ve used before, that I’ve told before that I know that work. Let’s say, for this context, like someone has never given a talk before, they have nothing to pull from. In that setting you want to be really, really clear about what’s the point of the presentation, what’s the point of the talk, what’s the main idea that you want to get to.

So, there may be talks that we’ve all sat through and listened through that you’re just kind of be, “Yeah, it’s interesting or it’s good or entertaining or whatever,” but like, “I’m not really sure what the point of it was and I’m not really sure where this was going.” So, are you trying to get someone to take action? Are you trying to convince someone? Are you trying to persuade someone? Are you trying to inspire or motivate or encourage? Like, what’s the point of the talk? So, being clear on that.

From there you can kind of reverse-engineer or work backwards. So, what I would do is once you kind of have that main idea is then you can just kind of brainstorm and come up with anything related to that idea. So, maybe it’s a story, maybe it’s a stat, maybe it’s an image, maybe it’s a video, maybe it’s a point, a principle, a quote, just anything you can think of, no filter, just brainstorming anything you can think of related to that topic.

From there you can start to put together a bit of a skeleton outline of, “All right. If I’m going to make this key point, then what’s like the natural progression that I need to follow in order to take the audience to that place?” And then you can kind of put together an outline and kind of fill in some of the meat from there. So, what I would do, personally, is I like to manuscript it out, and I manuscript it not from the standpoint of, “Hey, I need to have a script that I’m going to remember and memorize word for word.” That’s not the point of it.

The point of it, though, is I really want to take the time to get like all the thoughts down on paper to make sure that it all naturally flows well together. So, Pete, if you were to ask me, “Tell me about whenever you proposed to your wife.” Like I can tell you that story off the top of my head because I lived it. But I bet if I sat down and really took some time to, “Okay, let me think about the day, let me think about the weather, the context, what happened, who did we call, who did we talk to, what happened next, how did we respond, how did she respond, how did I respond.” All the details of it, my guess would be a much, much better, more compelling, more interesting and engaging story.

And so that’s kind of the point is you’re really just trying to like get down on paper everything related to that topic, the point, the story, where you’re going with it so that by the time you’re ready to tell it there is more structure, there is more meat to it. And whenever I’m working on, in terms of practicing and rehearsing and going over it, I’m not trying to go over from the standpoint of, “Here’s a script that I have to memorize, that I have to know word for word.” I want to make sure that I understand the gist of it, the idea of it, the essence of it of where I’m going with the presentation and with the talk, but it doesn’t necessarily have to be this word-for-word script that I’m trying to memorize.

So, if you’re in front of an audience and you are singing some popular song or the national anthem, and you screw up the lyrics, like everybody knows it. But if you’re giving a talk or presentation, and like, “Oh, I forgot my line,” or, “I told the story out of order,” the audience has no idea, like it makes no impact, it makes no difference to them.

So, you’re not trying to memorize a script where you’re like, “I need to know every single word of what I’m saying,” and it becomes this robotic regurgitation of words, but I just need to know where I’m going, and I need to know how I want to tell this story or make this point so that the talk is much more prepared and practiced or rehearsed rather than just getting up and winging it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Now, when you say manuscripts, so then you’re saying that, in fact, you are writing every word but you’re not worried about saying every word. Is that fair?

Grant Baldwin
Correct. Exactly. Yup, so I would type, and I think, I mean, everybody’s different but I think, for a lot of us, we write or we type the way we would speak. So, I’m trying to, as I’m typing something out, I’m typing it out like thinking through, like, “How would I actually say this? If I’m standing in front of an audience, how would I actually be communicating it and making sure that I’m writing it in that way?”

Now, again, it’s not from the standpoint of, “This is exactly how I must say this.” Now, there’s going to be a couple key things, maybe a key point or a real main idea that you’re like, “These are the 10 words in this order, and I need to say it this way because, hmm, that works.”

Pete Mockaitis
“Ask not what you can do…” Oh, listen up already.

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, you got to know that stuff but for the most part, most of the pieces within the talk you need to know the idea of it and the essence of it without feeling like, “I need to know verbatim, word for word, how to tell this seven-minute story.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, I dig that. So, you’re actually typing as opposed to recording and transcribing.

Grant Baldwin
Correct. Yup.

Pete Mockaitis
And so that’s just kind of your flavor, and that works for you, and that’s helpful. Thank you. So, what I like there…

Grant Baldwin
Yeah. Well, let’s just say I don’t think there’s a right or wrong way to go about either. Like that’s what I do, whereas I know some people who, they prefer to handwrite things out. Like, you mentioned, some people like to transcribe or some people like to have bullet points of an outline, and that’s what they go off of, and they kind of fill in the blanks as they go. And to each their own. I think that the more you speak the more you kind of figure out what makes sense and what works for you and just your preference and your style.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, it’s going to vary how much time it takes, but as you laid it out there it’s like the level of thought you’re giving it is the level of the individual word as opposed to, “Well, I’m going to kind of talk about point one, then point two, then point three. Okay, I’m ready.”

Grant Baldwin
Correct, yup. Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
And so, then, it sounds like there’s a wide variation in terms of just how much prep is enough prep. But could you give us, I know numbers are hazardous but I want to hammer home the point that I think is in your head. So, if it’s moderate stakes, 20 minutes of talk and new content, how much prep is like the bare minimum you think a person should invest?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, if you’re doing 20 minutes of content, I mean, from I just found out I’ve got to give 20 minutes to giving the presentation, I’m probably looking at maybe five hours’ worth of just like really… again, it depends on the stakes of it, but anywhere from three to five hours, I would say, because it takes time to really… it’s not like you’re going to sit down and you’re going to type for 20 minutes and it all are going to naturally come out, and then you’re going to go over, time to turn it, it’s ready to go. It just takes time to go over it.

I think, also, the more often you are speaking and the more that you’re generating content, or the more that you’re learning new material, the quicker and more efficient you get at it. The first time you do anything is not nearly going to be as efficient as the time when you do it the hundredth time. So, the more you do something the more comfortable you’re going to start to feel with it as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Perfect. So, I dig that. So, then, that ratio that’s like nine to 15 times or so of prep time to content time, and I think that’s just handy because I’ve been in a position where the team works long and hard on the underlying backend data and the slide creation and locking down the deck just perfectly, and then very little time on, “So, how are we going to say this if we really want to be persuasive or inspiring?”

And so, I think if I could touch upon that for a moment, how does one be all the more persuasive and inspiring? Because, in some ways, I think speeches are easier if your goal is to like, “I’m going to inform them about this. By the end of the speech they will now know about this thing that I’ve told them about.” I think that’s kind of an easier hurdle to clear or goal to hit. But when it comes to like human beings having their hearts stirred and wanting to take action, boy, what’s the secret sauce to making that happen?

Grant Baldwin
Well, I would say this, I think that motivating other people to do something is very, very difficult. Like, at the end of the day, I can’t make someone else do something. So, one thing that I think is very powerful and effective that I think anybody can use is stories, and ideally first-person stories. So, that’s something that I tend to use a lot of whenever I speak is first-person stories, stories that I’ve actually lived.

So, yeah, sure you can tell, “Let me tell you about this story from the 1930s, and here’s this person who overcame this thing, and here’s how it all worked out in the end.” Like that’s great and there’s a place for that but, at the same time, saying, “Here’s something I experienced, something I lived, and something that I did.”

And, you know what, sometimes we think like it has to be some crazy, impactful, like, “I climbed Mt. Everest blind in shorts, and I lived to tell about it.” It doesn’t necessarily have to be that. I think, again, that’s kind of a misconception with speaking is that, “I can’t become a speaker because I haven’t done or overcome some crazy obstacle.”

So, like in my case, I’m a white male from the Midwest who’s had a pretty normal life. Like, on paper there’s no reason I should be a speaker. But the funny thing is you don’t have to overcome some crazy obstacle in order to be a speaker. Just you sharing your own personal experience, or sharing life from and sharing things that you have learned can certainly be valuable to an audience because your audience, most people haven’t climbed Mt. Everest blind in shorts.

Most people are just, they’re normal people going through their daily lives. And hearing someone else is doing it and hearing someone else has overcome something or accomplished something can be extremely impactful for them. So, using stories is really, really, really powerful, and stories can be used in a variety of different ways. But from just motivating and inspiring and connecting with an audience, just as human beings, like we’re really, really drawn to stories, so I highly recommend that as a tool for any speaker.

Pete Mockaitis
And so, I like what you said, and earlier we had Dr. Carmen Simon talking about what makes great stories memorable. And often, she said, them being relatable is what trumps being sort of dramatic with regard to their emotions. So, what makes a story good then? It may not need to be super epic tales of Everest, but what sort of separates a great story from an okay story?

Grant Baldwin
Well, I would totally echo the relatable part. So, I’m thinking through several of the stories that I tell on a regular basis. So, stories like the skydiving and just the funny experience that happened with that, or going to Disney World with my daughters and how funny interaction that we had, or as a teenager, toilet papering a friend’s house and getting busted, or my very first car and all the problems that I had with that.

None of these are just like, “Then I met the President and this happened, and then I was on the secret ops mission, and then this happened. And then I won the Olympic gold medal.” So, it’s like this is normal human everyday stuff. Like anytime I tell a story about my first car, anybody in the audience has had a first car and they can relate to it, or something that’s gone wrong.

Even like you mentioned the travel thing at the beginning, is like those are just relatable normal, like human things that we have had, “Oh, let me tell you my travel story. And here’s what happened to me.” Just relatable human stuff that people can connect with. I remember hearing General Colin Powel speak several years ago, and it was great. He was a phenomenal speaker. And I think, at the time, or maybe he had been the Secretary of Defense, I believe, something to that effect.

And so, he’s telling a really cool story about being on Air Force One, and on and on, and you’re just like, “That’s pretty cool, but, like, I’ve never been on the Air Force One and I don’t see that in my future anytime soon.” So, it feels like there’s some level of disconnect, versus like, “Hey, let me tell you about my first car,” and you probably had a similar thing.

Or, “Here’s a funny experience I had with my kids,” and you may have experienced something similar. Or, “Here’s something that happened in a restaurant,” or traveling, or whatever, that is just a relatable type of thing that a high percentage of the audience is going to be like, “Oh, yeah, totally understand that, totally get that, and I’m with you as you’re telling the story.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Yeah, I dig that. Thank you. And so, now, I’m wondering a little bit in terms of thinking about you in the audience of another speaker. It just makes me wonder, given the eye and the ear that you’ve developed by beholding many a presenter, can you share, are there a few things that are sort of like, “Dude, or lady, cut that out. This is an annoying suboptimal habit or thing that presenters do that has just no place and needs to stop”? Are there a few like top pet peeves in the Grant no-no list?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, like one that comes to mind is having a huge dependency on your slides. So, here’s one way to approach it, and I rarely, if ever, use slides. They have a huge value, there’s a huge place for them to be used, and they can provide an impact that your words may not be able to provide. But what often happens to speakers is they are more fixated and focused on the slides than on the audience and the presentation itself.

So, as a good kind of barometer here is, think of it this way. If you’re getting ready to give a presentation with slides, and your slides go down, or they don’t work, or the technology breaks, if that were to happen just five minutes before you’re supposed to speak, can you still be ready? Are you still good to go? Because if you’re someone who is like, “Oh, I can’t even function without my slides,” then you’re not ready, like you shouldn’t be up there speaking.

So, I’ll give you an example. My wife is attending a conference a couple of months ago, and she texted me, and she said, “Hey, I’m in this session that was supposed to start 15 minutes ago, and the slides aren’t working, and the speaker just told the audience they can’t speak without the slides.” I was like, “Then you shouldn’t be up there, you shouldn’t be speaking.”

So, I think just like one of the things I always like to say is that your slide should be an enhancement not a replacement for your talk. They shouldn’t be a crutch. So, if they break, you’d be like, “Oh, that sucks,” but your talk should still stand on its own. It should still be solid. Even the other day I was, a couple of weeks, I was at a conference and I was backstage talking with one of the other speakers. And they were going over their slides, slides, slides, slides, just their whole head was absorbed with the slides. I was like, “Dude, get out of it. Like, forget the slides. You have to connect with the audience.”

Using your slides as a cheat sheet or as a guide, or as knowing where to go, like I get some of that, but you also need to know your material. You need to know where your presentation is going without just having to, “I’m just going to throw up a bunch of bullet points then I’m just going to turn and read.”

I mean, if you’re just going to do that, like what’s the point of you? Just give the audience your outline and leave. There’s no point in you just reading stuff and regurgitating stuff to the audience when they’re fully capable of reading. So, slides are good, use slides but just make sure that they’re an enhancement not a replacement for your talk.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, that’s the top pet peeve that leapt to mind. Any others?

Grant Baldwin
Well, I would say, you speak a lot, I speak a lot. I don’t know about you, but I’m not really overly critical with speakers, in part, because I know most speakers haven’t done as much speaking as you or I may have done, Pete. So, it’s not fair to look at someone and say, “Okay, this is your first presentation so let’s just go through every single thing that you did wrong here.”

I remember speaking at a conference and had a friend of mine who gave me a nice compliment but a humbling compliment. And I spoke at this conference, and it’s like the fourth or fifth year of the conference, and I gave a closing keynote, and it went really, really well. And the client came up afterwards, and said, “You’re the best keynote speaker that we’ve ever had.” And I was like, “That’s awesome. That’s so cool.” Well, most of the keynote speakers they’ve had are people who give a few talks here and there but not to the level that I’ve done in terms of just the number of engagements, right?

So, I told a friend this, I was like, “Dude, check this out. He just said I was the best speaker they’ve ever had.” And he’s like, “You’re a professional speaker. You should be the best that they’ve ever had. If you weren’t you’ve got a problem with that, right?” So, the point being, if this is your first time speaking, like I don’t want to be hypercritical of those who are just getting started or only have done a couple things, but the slides should be one thing, using stories should be another thing.

The other thing I would say, too, going back to what we talked about earlier that I think any speaker at any level can do is really spending the time to practice and go over your material. Again, just don’t get up and wing it, don’t just get up and make stuff up, don’t just shoot from the hip           . Like really spending the time to go through the material, know the material, and it makes a huge, huge difference.

A good exercise to go through with this, or maybe a little homework assignment, is to go on Netflix and look up the documentary called Comedian. Have you seen this before?

Pete Mockaitis
Is this Jerry Seinfeld?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah. It had been a DVD for many, many years. I’ve got the DVD, but actually, like recently, within like literally the past few weeks came out on Netflix. It is a great documentary. And the nutshell of it is basically it was filmed in like, I think, the early 2000s. It was right after the show Seinfeld wrapped up, and it’s following Jerry Seinfeld around as he’s doing his standup comedy.

But, really, he’s working on new material, so it shows him getting up on stage and he’s bombing, or he’s forgetting the punchline, or he’s being heckled. And he’s at the top of his game, like he’s one of the more recognized people in entertainment, and yet, here he is showing like, “I’m trying to work on this craft, these jokes.” It’s not just, “Oh, Jerry Seinfeld is funny,” so he just gets up and talk and it all just works out.

It just shows him behind the scenes of how this comes together. So, you watch a special on Netflix or HBO or Comedy Central or whatever, and you think like, “That just happened.” It just doesn’t work like that. They just spend so much time behind the scenes going over and over and over their material so that they feel confident, they feel comfortable, and they feel prepared when they get up and speak. So, I think a speaker/presenter at any level can spend time practicing and preparing and it makes a huge difference.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, perfect. Thank you. Well, so then, I’m curious to hear, as we kind of transition a bit, of all the suggestions that you have offered a number of times, what do you believe is sort of the biggest bang for the buck when it comes to, over the long term, improving your speaking presentation skills? Like, if there’s one thing you would have people do regularly to get better, what would that thing be?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, I mean, practice would be definitely up there on the list. I think a couple other things that would come to mind would be to get feedback from not just respected people that you know who have a lot of speaking experience who can give you specific feedback, but also from peers and colleagues who may be other speakers as well.

So, getting that feedback, I think makes a big difference. Working with speaking coaches, again, depending on if you’re just like, “Hey, I give one talk a year, and it’s not that big a deal,” it may not be necessary. But if you’re someone where, “Hey, I give a lot of presentations, they’re very high-stakes presentations,” getting that outside feedback from a speaking coach or from a professional speaker who can go through and can really help you on that content of what you’re presenting but also on your presentation style, your presentation skills, can make a huge difference.

Another simple thing that you can do is just recording yourself and watching it back which, for most people, could be brutally painful. But, oftentimes, we can identify things that maybe we wouldn’t have noticed otherwise. So, maybe there’s some type of a filler word that you use regularly, or maybe there’s something you do with your hands, that you’re like, “I didn’t even realize I did that but once I watch it back I see how distracting that is.” Or, “Here’s something every time I tell this story, then this part isn’t funny, and I think it’s funny but now that I’m watching it back, that doesn’t make sense. There’s no flow.”

And you’re kind of just trying to pull this, like have this out-of-body experience where you’re going back and going through the material to figure out like what’s working and what’s not, and just kind of breaking it down in that way. So, recording yourself, going back, reviewing it, watching it is another good exercise that any speaker can do.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, Grant, tell me, is there anything else you want to make sure to mention before we shift gears and hear about some of your favorite things?

Grant Baldwin
I don’t know what my favorite things are so I’m excited about that. Let’s get to that.

Pete Mockaitis
Let’s do it. Okay. Could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Grant Baldwin
One of my favorites quote I like to share is, “Who you are is more important than what you do.” Meaning, if you’re a great speaker, if you’re a great employee, if you’re a great entrepreneur, if you’re a great fill in the blank, but you drop the ball as a husband, as a wife, as a mother, as a father, if you’re just a shell of a human being, that’s just not worth it. So, that’s one I try to remind myself of regularly, “Who you are is more important than what you do.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Excellent.

Pete Mockaitis
And how about a favorite book?

Grant Baldwin
Let’s see here. I’m just looking at what I’ve got on my desk here. A lot of times I think it’s kind of depends on your current situation or what you’re chewing on. There’s a book I read recently, or I actually read it a couple of years ago but then was re-reading it recently called Built to Sell. And it’s not necessarily, like, yeah, it’s in the context of if you want to sell your business, but it’s also in the context of trying to build a business that doesn’t depend on you. And so that was a really good one that there’s a lot that could be pulled from.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And, tell me, do you have a favorite tool, something that helps you be awesome at your job?

Grant Baldwin
I use Slack constantly with our team, with communicating with others. If you’re not familiar with this, it’s like a modern-day instant messenger tool, and so there’s a lot of different functions and uses to that. But, yes, Slack is something I use super regularly. I also use a tool called Evernote a lot. It’s kind of my digital brain of any ideas or projects or tasks, or any type of thing that just something I want to save I could keep in Evernote. So, yeah, both Slack and Evernote are pretty common ones I use.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a favorite habit that helps you be effective?

Grant Baldwin
One thing that I would say would be very critical would just be exercise. And I know this is something that’s thrown around commonly but you’re only as good as the body that you have, and that you’re taking care of yourself. So, I just regularly exercise. I do a couple of things. So, there’s a strength-training class that I go to three times a week. I think going to an actual class, for me, personally, has made a big difference because there’s kind of a built-in accountability of the peer pressure of being around other people who can encourage you, that can support you.

That, “Man, I don’t want to get out of bed this early but I know that they’re going to be there and they’re going to give me grief if I’m not there, so, all right, I’ll just get up and go even if I’m not feeling like it. Or those guys are pushing harder so I’m going to push a little bit harder.” So, being in a class setting, for me, for my health, has made a big difference.

So, I do that three times a week and then usually several times a week I will do biking. I’ve done that either outside or we recently got a Peloton Bike so I do these indoor spin classes and those things kick your butt too. But, just bottom line, just taking care of yourself doing something makes a big difference to your ability to focus, get stuff done throughout the day.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a particular nugget or piece that you share that really seems to connect and resonate with your clients, sort of a Grant original that gets them taking notes and saying, “Oh, yeah”?

Grant Baldwin
Well, I would say, like from a speaking standpoint, like if you want to get into like professional speaking, if that’s something you want to do more seriously, then a big thing I would say would be to make sure you’re really, really clear on who you speak to and what you speak about. And I think this is where most speakers have a difficult time is they try to speak to anybody and everybody about everything and anything and nothing all at the same time. But, as counterintuitive as it feels like, the more narrow and focused you are, the easier it is to find and book speaking engagements versus just trying to appeal to anybody and everybody which just doesn’t work.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And, Grant, if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Grant Baldwin
We’ve got a podcast ourselves over at TheSpeakerLab.com, and if people are interested in learning more about how to find and book paid speaking engagements, we’ve got a free training that people can check out over at FreeSpeakerWorkshop.com.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And do you have a final challenge or call to action you’d issue to folks seeking to be awesome at their jobs?

Grant Baldwin
Yeah, I would say the big thing would just be to take some small step of action. And I think that that’s even going back to if you’re working on your talk or your presentation, thinking it through the lens of, “What do you want the audience to do as a result of this?” So, taking some small step of action. If you take the time to listen to this podcast, or any podcast, or read an article or a book or a blogpost or whatever, and you don’t do anything different, like what’s the point of that? So, any little nugget of thing that you want to just take and apply and implement, just taking some type of action makes a huge difference.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Awesome. Well, Grant, thanks so much for taking the time and sharing your perspective here. I wish you and The Speaker Lab tons of luck, and success, and gigs, and all the good stuff.

Grant Baldwin
Thanks, Pete. Appreciate you letting me hang out with you, man.