GMâs Chief Talent Officer Michael J. Arena explores the idea of ambidextrous leadership to help lead your organization in its current state and in its future â at the same time.
You’ll Learn:
- Ways to positively disrupt the way you work
- Concrete ways to mine the ideas of your organization
- Why conflict is essential to the evolution of ideas
About Michael
Michael is the Chief Talent Officer for General Motors (GM), where he launched GM2020, a grass roots initiative designed to enable employees to positively disrupt the way they work, which was highlighted in Fast Company and Fortune. Michael is the author of the book Adaptive Space, which is based on a decade long research initiative that won the 2017 Walker Prize from People + Strategy.
Items Mentioned in this Show:
- Michaelâs website:Â https://www.adaptivespace.net
- Michaelâs book: Adaptive Space
- Research: Agility: It rhymes with stability
- Research: What Creates Energy in Organizations?
- Book: Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success by Adam Grant
- Self-assessment: www.NetworkRoles.com
Michael J. Arena Interview Transcript
Pete Mockaitis
Michael, thanks so much for joining us here on the How to be Awesome at Your Job podcast.
Michael J Arena
Thanks Pete. Iâm looking forward to this.
Pete Mockaitis
Oh me too, me too. Well youâve got what sounds to be to me like a pretty fun job as the chief talent officer at General Motors. Can you orient us a little bit to what does that mean in practice?
Michael J Arena
In essence itâs really about how do you optimize human capital across the overall corporation, so how do we bring in the best people possible. In short, Iâd like to say, how do we bring in the best people possible and then bring the best out in those people. Thatâs all about human capital and how do we get those people positioned to be able to leverage what they know. Yeah, itâs quite fun.
Pete Mockaitis
Intriguing. Now in practice over the last few years youâve been doing a lot of bringing out the best in people it sounds like. If you look at sort of the financial picture at General Motors in 2009, theyâre filing for bankruptcy and now youâve got some great profits. The business press would point to cultural shifts as being an essential part of making that transformation.
Could you give us a little bit of the behind-the-scenes or in-the-middle-of-things narrative for how this came to be and the human capital pieces play into it?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, absolutely. Just to clarify, I joined the company in 2012, so I can tell you â I can describe that journey from that point forward and more precisely around this role here in HR. I do think itâs about culture. Itâs certainly â itâs been quite the journey.
I can remember when Mary Barra took over as CEO. One of her very first quotes and comments was this industry is going to change more in the next five years than it has in the last 50. What that means is you need to rethink everything youâre doing.
Culture is a core element of that. Itâs not the only one. It is either an enabler or a stifler of what you want to do with things like business strategy and how youâre going to drive operational management, how youâre going to think about new consumers and new business models and all that sort of stuff. Itâs been quite the comprehensive journey from that point to this with much of it still in front of us.
Pete Mockaitis
Well, so could you give us a little bit of the particulars with regard to before the culture was more like this and now itâs more like that and here are some of the key things we did to bring about that shift?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, and again, I think it starts kind of with the industry. This was an organization and an industry that was all about driving execution, all about continuing to drive scale across the world. The gameâs changed quite a bit. Itâs now â weâve got a â itâs now the future mobility.
We now need to think about what are customers demanding, what are customers â the best illustration I can give about that, then Iâll go back to the specifics of your question is people are moving to cities, just to put it in a real live external marketplace example. People are moving into cities and everyoneâs becoming connected. The way you think about mobility inside of a city versus mobility in a suburban environment is very different.
We need to then get the business to start thinking about things differently. That certainly requires us to instill new sets of behaviors and to challenge everybody to think bigger than perhaps they had in the past. Again, to move faster as well because the world outside is moving super fast compared to what weâve been used to.
Pete Mockaitis
All right, so it seems like weâre changing sort of the total focus in terms of what General Motors wants to be excellent at in order to succeed in a different environment with more people in cities and sort of car sharing and ride services, sort of a different landscape than it was in 2009. Iâm curious to hear what does that look like in terms of day in/day out humans at GM interacting with other humans and how theyâre doing it differently now?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, one of the big things we did to start to drive this transformation is we plugged in a program that we call Transformational Leadership. This was a partnership with Stanford. Itâs a year-long cohort program with Stanford where we take the top of the organization, 35 people on an annual basis, go through this program.
The reason I call out that program is because it answers your question rather directly in that weâre not just shifting to the future, weâre thinking both about the current state of the business and the future state of the business in the same moment. We call that ambidextrous leadership if you will. That came out of that program.
Everything we talk about here is growth and core. Weâve got to be excellent at the core of the business. Weâve got to continue to be â operations, we have an operational excellence program. Operations have to be maniacally precise and everything we produce has to be durable and everything else, but at the same time, which is what makes it ambidextrous, we need to be thinking about the future. We need to be thinking about where is the customer tomorrow going to be and how can we get there sooner than anybody else.
Thereâs a lot of people talking about agility in the world today. The way I like to talk about it is most large organizations shouldnât talk about themselves as being completely agile. They need to be agile in places. They need to be agile on the edge. They need to be agile in the growth side of the business because the growth side of the business is where the future is. They need to be disciplined and operationally excellent in the core.
In fact, one of the studies that I read recently that talks about this, and then I can share exactly how weâre doing that, was a Mackenzie study where they said organizations need to be both fast at times and stable at other times. About only 12% of the companies they reviewed were able to do those two things at the same time.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I think that makes a ton of sense with regard to boy, if you think about sort of any organization, sort of what it can handle well and what it canât, I even think about customer service interactions in terms of itâs like if you want to check your credit card balance or sort of get some basic information and sort of â or get a replacement card or report a stolen card or do some fraud stuff or change the credit limit, itâs like thatâs kind of very basic.
But if you sort of go out beyond the edges, suddenly it gets really I guess confusing for the people in terms of what theyâre trying to do. Itâs like weâre really built up and tooled up to do these dozen things very quickly and efficiently and systematically.
But now Iâm trying to get my private mortgage insurance canceled with my new insurer â my new mortgage holder because they transferred them over as they do. Itâs been rather challenging. Itâs like, âNo, no, no, I understand your policy, but in fact if you looked at the original text, the original mortgage, this is kind of how itâs supposed to work, so can we do that?â Theyâre just so flummoxed, like, âWeâre going to have to look into this, sir.â
I think thatâs intriguing to think about it. In some ways you want to just be high-scale, high-efficiency with doing that thing repeatedly with, frankly no innovation because itâs working great and other areas where you really got to adapt and see whatâs new and what are people starting to really ask for.
Michael J Arena
Yeah, 100%. 100%. Itâs funny that you mentioned banking as your example because I grew up in banking.
Pete Mockaitis
Yeah.
Michael J Arena
I remember that exact question coming to me at one point in time when I was asked by the president, the company I was working for, âMichael, how can we become more innovative?â
I told the same story you just did a moment ago. âAre you really sure you want to be innovative where youâre driving precision and youâve built expectations for consumers and you want to be reliable and you want to create a consistent set of interactions or are you asking if you want to be innovative on the edges?â
At that point in time, this was before mobile banking, so itâs a great illustration. When it comes to something like mobile banking before it had existed, you have to be innovative there because no oneâs ever done that at that point in time. No one had ever done that. You have to be agile. You have to think differently. You have to move, shift, flux, understand the consumer, shift with the market. You have to do that super fast.
Thatâs where we are now as a company on things like car sharing and what weâre doing with Maven, what weâre doing with electification, what weâre doing with self-driving vehicles. You have to be completely agile and you have to manage that side of the business with a whole different set of muscles while continuing to keep an eye on the core of the business and making sure that youâre doing that flawlessly.
My analogy for this is every organization is both a super tanker, which is critical to getting stuff done precisely and at scale and a set of speed boats that are being sort of tossed out into the white water so that they can move fast and agilely shift with the environment and then ultimately grow themselves into what the next core of the business is and should be.
Pete Mockaitis
Can you talk a little bit about sort of the people practices that bring that about? Iâd be curious to hear if in the course of having meetings or interactions one-on-one, youâd say whereas before at GM people more so spoke or interacted or accepted or challenged these kinds of things, now it looks different in terms of their interactions.
Michael J Arena
Yeah, so the first thing to know is that in that model the era of one-size-fits-all solutions is inappropriate. Youâve got to use different solutions for the different parts of the model. Some of the practices are â we use a lot of design thinking on the growth side of the business. Weâre out talking to consumers. Weâre out engaging consumers in Manhattan and San Francisco and places that we might not interact with on a day-to-day basis traditionally.
Then weâre thinking about how do we bring those ideas back into the business and connect up with other parts of the business, build bridges, if you will, to do agile design and to move fast. Amazon calls them small two-pizza teams, very small teams that can first of all build something, like a minimum viable product or solution and then ultimately the reason the bridges matter later is scaling. Thatâs the growth side of the business.
Now on the core side of the business, you just incrementally have to ask yourself the question, how do we make this better every single day. How do we continue to get more nimble and more agile even in the core so that whenever the new growth part of the business comes to fruition, that the core is already ready to sort of cast it up onboard and take it on?
Pete Mockaitis
Well, so then in forming these teams, can you give us an example of something that youâre able to quickly react to and how it was done?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, so a couple different examples. The one that I can think of most notably off the top of my head is what weâve been doing with Maven, which Iâve mentioned already. Maven is our car sharing platform. Maven by its very definition is access to a vehicle as opposed to ownership of it. We sell cars and in the core of the business we continue to and will continue to for quite some time.
But on the other hand just like there is Uber and Lyft, which are ride sharing applications, thereâs a need to get from one point to the next inside the city. We found this sort of whitespace that no one was serving, which is how do get outside â how do you not own a vehicle, but maybe take that vehicle for longer durations than just from one of the end to the other end of the city.
Maybe youâve got it for a couple hours. Youâre driving it as opposed to someone picking you up and youâre actually deploying an asset â someone elseâs asset â that may be sitting in the garage at some point in time.
This whole shared economy model, we went out â to be very precise â we went out and started interviewing people in the streets. It was in design thinking. What we found out was owning a vehicle inside of a city may be more of a burden than a benefit for some, but we can build a solution around that so that they still have access to a vehicle in such a way that they get the conveniences of it without the burdens of it. Thatâs where Maven really evolved from.
Pete Mockaitis
Thatâs cool. Now you were big in pushing a concept called GM 2020 throughout the organization. What does this mean?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, itâs, again, weâre now back in the core of the business. One of the things we want to do is we want to think about the core of the business in regards to how do we build the culture where people just canât wait to show up to work the next day. People just really want to be part of something bigger than themselves.
Back in 2014, we launched this, Iâll call it a movement. We launched this movement where we invited â and this was back when we were really trying to attract young people into the organization. We were really just starting to as corporations as a whole create different environments that were, at that point in time, I would say were more Millennial friendly. I donât believe that any more. I think thatâs true for anyone and all of us.
But we launched this initiate where we thought about okay, if we were to recreate the culture or rethink culture or rethink the workplace, why not invite the people in the room that will actually be living with those outputs in the year 2020.
Literally using some design thinking methodologies and inviting 30 people into a two-day event, we went out, we took them out on buses, and we went and looked at all these creative workplaces first across Detroit. That movement, those 30 people, ended up growing into a movement that we call GM 2020, how do we positively disrupt the way we work.
They continue to grow into a much larger body of people. Itâs thousands now of people that show up into these events, constantly thinking about how we can get better and all volunteers, but constantly thinking about how we can organically get better on a day-to-day basis.
Pete Mockaitis
Thatâs excellent. Then what have been some of the key adopted practices that have shown up in terms of doing work better and in a more enjoyable way?
Michael J Arena
The great part about this is that all kinds of ideas emerge out of this. One of the â perhaps my favorite story, there are plenty that I can share, but perhaps my favorite story was we were about ready to open up a new building.
It was a ten-floor building where generally what happens is you go in, you bring a facilities crew in. You bring in some architects. They look around the space and they decide what the footprint should look like. They plug in standard furniture and everything else. Well, rather than approaching it that way, what we decided was why not invite the people who are going to be working in that space into designing it.
We did what we called a two-day co-lab, kind of like a hack-a-thon, if you will, across two days. We invited in 35 people. We put them into teams of 5. We asked them to â we walked them through the space. We gave them the same parameters that any facilities team would have in regards to cost constraints and architectural barriers and all that sort of stuff.
We literally had these teams and teams of five build prototypes. After giving all those constraints and talking to individual users, which were their fellow employees, we actually had them build prototypes of what that space should look like. They competed against each other.
At the end of the â I said two days, it was actually 24 hours from beginning to end, from 12 oâclock to 1 oâclock the next day â at 12 oâclock the next day, they presented their working physical prototypes to a design team and the winning team actually created the design of the way that that building ultimately was created.
Pete Mockaitis
Very cool. Then how did they like it?
Michael J Arena
Again, it was very different then perhaps what would have been designed for them. One of my favorite stories was the winning team actually cut a hole in the â they said if you want to collaborate, you need to be able to look up and down across multiple floors, so they actually cut a hole in the center of the building in their prototype three floors deep. They said âThis is will be the collaboration zone. The two floors above that will be the concentration/deep work zone.â
Whenever they did that, well, of course theyâre not architects, so they werenât thinking about how sound this was, so there was all this push back on, âYeah, yeah, yeah, but architecturally that doesnât stand up.â Iâm thrilled to say that that team ended up becoming part of the overall design team.
They didnât cut a hole in two floors, but they ended up â or in three floors, but they ended up cutting it in the two in order to make their solution work. They were thrilled, the short answer. They were thrilled at the end of the day with the new design.
Thatâs not a huge example, but there are all kinds of those everyday examples that Iâm giving you now, like where people designed an onboarding app or people designed a learn and share so that they could do a career fair and all these little things that manifested throughout this community so that theyâre able to move really fast and organically create these new solutions.
Pete Mockaitis
Thatâs interesting. With the hole in the floor, you could â one person could stand on one floor, the other person stands on the floor above and they look down at each other?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, exactly. Exactly.
Pete Mockaitis
You could accidently â if you werenât paying attention, walk into a hole and fall down.
Michael J Arena
No, no, itâs not quite that way. They had the railings and all that stuff up. But it was really much more to illustrate that weâre not separating ourselves from different groups. If weâre going to collaborate, we at least need to have this sort of proximity to one another as opposed to hitting our floor button and showing up.
Itâs, again, a small thing, but as you engage people in making those decisions themselves, they become very, very proud about those outcomes and they figure out how to iterate on it and make it better over time.
Pete Mockaitis
So people donât speak to each other through the floors? Itâs more of a symbolic-
Michael J Arena
Yeah, absolutely. They see each other.
Pete Mockaitis
Okay.
Michael J Arena
So they can certainly correspond back and forth. I guess Iâm just sort of the dispelling the safety myth.
Pete Mockaitis
Okay, got you. The railings certainly, that makes sense. Weâve got the safety covered. They would in fact speak through the hole from one floor to another.
Michael J Arena
Completely.
Pete Mockaitis
Okay, thatâs cool. Thatâs fun. Now, youâve also got a book, Adaptive Space, that captures some of these principles that you put into practice. Can you sort of share with us kind of whatâs the book all about?
Michael J Arena
Iâve talked around a lot of it already, but itâs this core concept of why are some organizations adaptive and are able to respond to the changing marketplace and the other organizations perhaps arenât quite as adaptive.
As a researcher, this was even prior to my time I come into General Motors, as a researcher, four of us actually launched a research initiative, went out and studied 60 different companies, all Fortune, really, 100 companies, and asked that question, why are some adaptive and why are others not.
What we found, and this is the part that I talked around a bit already is that those were â every single organization had two things. They had these sort of core systems, we call them operational systems, which is the formality of how you get work done and they all had entrepreneurial pockets, even organizations that arenât adaptive have innovative entrepreneurial activities happen within them.
What the adaptive ones had that the non-adaptive organizations didnât have was what we ultimately called adaptive space, but basically itâs the bridge to get those ideas through the organization and pulled into the formal systems.
Think of it quite literally as how do you more intentionally mine the idea, everyday ideas throughout your organization, both big and small in such a way that it becomes part of the adaptive fabric of an organization that can respond differently to the outside market. That was a lot, but-
Pete Mockaitis
What are some of the â what was that?
Michael J Arena
No, I was just saying, so that was more than a mouthful for you.
Pete Mockaitis
Oh no, thatâs cool. Then what are some of the practices associated with getting those bridges up and going in terms of these things make all the difference if youâve got them versus donât?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, yeah. The interesting part about this is itâs a social phenomenon. The interesting thing is the connections that you create inside an organization are more important than I think we ever believed they were before.
Think about it this way, we all want to think about who are the â how do we build a bigger network and how do we build our network inside of an organization. What we discovered was your network matters immensely, but your network needs to be different for different intentions.
I talk a lot about social capital. Iâm in the talent space and spend a lot of my time talking about human capital, but I also talk about social capital. Human capital is what you know, social capital is how well positioned you are to leverage what you know. Remember, I said that every organization had entrepreneurial pockets, but not everybody was able to leverage that and that was because they werenât connected appropriately.
A couple of the practices to get very precise with you is there are times where you need to create discovery networks. A discovery network is a network thatâs actually going outside of the insular walls of an organization and finding out what the customers of tomorrow really need and want, like the Maven story I shared with you a few moments ago.
There are also times that ideas were too. Organizations, all organizations have lots of ideas. Youâve got to bring those ideas into the world. Itâs important to have discovery connections because thatâs how you stay relevant, thatâs how you can move â you can keep pace with the outside market, but youâve got to bring those ideas in and youâve got to actually put them in the very small, tight, what Amazon calls two-pizza teams. We call that agile design in many organizations or scrum teams.
That requires a different set of connections. You want very trusted small groups of teams of maybe six that are taking ideas that were discovered and then bringing them into the world and iterating them, move them fast.
Then once they built a minimum viable product, this is where a lot of companies sort of fail, once you build a minimum viable product inside of a small pocket, you then have to start to think about how do I get that scaled on across the broader business. That requires yet a different set of connections that we call diffusion connections.
Thatâs â when you think about those different practices, itâs a different set of connections and a different set of practices for each of those steps, if you will, on any given product lifecycle or any given solution lifecycle into the business.
Pete Mockaitis
Iâm really intrigued by the notion that you said that the ideas are a dime a dozen. Thereâs tons of them in a scaled organization. Boy, I imagine a critical lever that is really make or break here is effectively choosing, selecting, deciding which of these ideas are worthy of getting a two-pizza team to advance it and go after it a bit. What are some of the key ways that these decisions can be made optimally?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, youâve got to be disciplined in that process. Iâd say ideas are cheap. I say that somewhat tongue in cheek. Theyâre cheap if nothingâs done with them. If somebody just shares an idea and they donât do anything with that idea to bring it to life, then who knows if that was a good idea or not.
An idea is nothing but an abstract, but if you actually take that idea and you build something around it and you go test that idea, which gets into your question, the best way to find out if an idea is worthy is to actually build some aspect of it, low-resolution prototype and get out and test it. Test it first with some friends inside the business, find out if some colleagues get excited about it. Then ultimately test it with consumers or would be consumers.
Then thatâs not enough because itâs still this low resolution sort of fragment of an idea. Itâs better than the idea itself I should say, but itâs still a fragment of a concept. You then have to decide, okay, what are the thresholds to know whether or not we can win with this idea or this is a real idea that would have real market impact or this an idea thatâs worth our investment.
Thatâs a whole different series of practices and the only way to know that is to set up milestones around that concept or an idea and hold people accountable for getting to those milestones. If they donât, you kind of decommission it and you say we can only take so many of these at a time.
Every organization has a finite set of resources, so you just simply decide how many people am I going to invest in this idea, how many people â what do they need to prove between now and the next milestone, whatever that is, and if they donât prove it, do we have the courage to shut that idea down so that we can take those resources and reinvest them into something else.
In short, what you just heard me describe is there are parts of the organization where you need to act and think much like a startup.
Pete Mockaitis
Right. I think thatâs excellent in terms of having that discipline and those clear thresholds that youâre identifying. I guess Iâm thinking about backing it up a little bit earlier in the process. I imagine GM has thousands of ideas emerging. Then you may only pilot test out dozens at a time. Why donât we say 1 out of 80, little ratio, shows up and gets the minimum viable product treatment.
How do you decide what hits that initial threshold, like, âYou know what? We are going to spend some time, money, resources six people on this one.â
Michael J Arena
This is where I think it truly is a social phenomenon. I think our inclination â when you or I have a new idea, our inclination is to go take it to a leader and to go get it formalized. That may be the worst idea possible. That may be the worst step forward possible because you donât even know if that ideaâs good at this stage.
What Iâm â and weâve done this very much in the GM 2020 community, where we basically say, âIf you think youâve got a great idea, go find a friend.â That first friend is really social proofing your idea. That first friend â somebody who you trust, somebody who you respect, somebody who you think would get this â is your first litmus test.
Once you share that idea with that friend, if they look at you like, âMichael, this is really stupid. I have no idea what youâre talking about,â well, you might just be wrong and you might just decide that itâs time to shut it down. But if theyâre excited about it, then our next step, what we talk about a lot is, go follow the energy.
If I share this idea with you and youâre excited about the idea, then okay, so who else might be excited about this idea. At this point it becomes more than itâs Peteâs idea, Michaelâs idea together and we go find a few more friends.
This, what Iâm describing to you, is much more organic than mechanistic, which is how we want to tend to think about innovation inside of a company. Itâs much more social than process driven.
At some point, you need formal support. At some point once you know youâve created network buzz and people are excited about this idea and they believe in the beauty of this as itâs co-created and itâs no longer just my idea, itâs all of our ideas and we can all find ourselves in it, well then the likelihood of securing support and resources is amplified ten-fold.
Thatâs the way that you get these, as I stated it earlier, these entrepreneurial pockets fired up and linked up across the broader organization for grander success.
Pete Mockaitis
Thatâs beautiful. Awesome. Well, any other kind of key practices you think the typical professional needs to know or do you want to move ahead to hear about some of your favorite things?
Michael J Arena
Yeah, well I guess one thing â because I havenât talked about one â thereâs one thing that everybody whoâs listening to this conversation is wondering. Okay, thatâs all fine. That sounds great. But what about the resistance? What about when somebody doesnât like my idea? Then what do I do?
One of the things that I like to talk about is conflict sometimes â charge into the conflict. The conflict later â once you believe your idea is good, once weâve got a band of a half dozen or so of us, then the conflict is really critical to the evolution of that idea. The conflict is essential to getting it scaled.
One is take that conflict as a compliment because youâre probably not doing anything innovative if you havenât created some disturbance. Charge into it and start to think about it. Oftentimes what I like to say is you canât really have a breakthrough without something to break through. If youâre not expecting some degree of resistance or some degree of conflict, then youâre probably not being so bold.
A lot of people ask me, âWell, what do you do with conflict? What happens whenever the antibodies kick in?â What I say is, âThatâs awesome.â Itâs about how do you pivot in response that that, how do you bring them in to the process so that you can pressure test those ideas, you can morph them and you can challenge them in such a way that you make them bigger and more scalable both within the business, but far more importantly outside into the marketplace.
Pete Mockaitis
Excellent. Thank you.
Michael J Arena
I just would not want to underplay sort of the value of tension even more than conflict, I wouldnât want to undervalue that, but what I will say is tension too early in the process actually prematurely kills ideas. Tension later in the process becomes almost like this pressure testing sort of amplifier, if you will, to get lift off sooner.
Pete Mockaitis
Thatâs cool. Thank you. Well now can you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?
Michael J Arena
You probably have noticed even though I live inside of a human capital job that social capital is an area that I spend a lot of my time.
One of my favorite quotes and this will get a little bit into the conflict thing is itâs a quote by Colonial Picq. This quote goes like this, âFive brave men, who do not know each other well, would not dare attack a lion.â I know thatâs masculine, so Iâll pivot it in the next part of the quote. âBut five lesser brave men or women would do so resolutely.â I think this is a team activity. What Iâm talking about, you have to have friends. You have to find friends. You have to have people who are in it with you.
One of the things that I know is that if you try to do this alone and you try to take all the credit for yourself and you try to hold onto an idea, you try to hoard it â this idea can be anything, any kind of solution â you will not succeed. But if you find and enlist friends and you work together as a team, youâre chances of succeeding are amplified significantly.
Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. How about a favorite study, experiment or bit of research?
Michael J Arena
Again, this whole networking space, I studied a lot of network theory. I guess the one that just jumps out at me right off the bat is a professor over at University of Michigan, Wayne Baker, a good friend of mine, went out and studied â we didnât even talk about this â but went out and studied energizers and people who bring energy into an organization, which is one of the core network roles that I talk a lot about.
What he found out was that high performing, agile adaptive organizations have three times as many energizers as average performing organizations. Thatâs a study, where in the HR space we talk a lot about engagement. My belief is weâre going to be talking much, much more about energy moving forward.
Pete Mockaitis
Intriguing. How about a favorite book?
Michael J Arena
I guess in the last couple years books that Iâve read, the one that jumps out the most is Adam Grantâs Give and Take, like givers and takers. His whole philosophy, if you havenât read it, is that long-term, givers, people who are constantly helping, supporting and lifting each other up are the winners in the long-term game. Itâs a phenomenal book.
Pete Mockaitis
How about a favorite habit?
Michael J Arena
I think itâs easy to live inside of an organization and become somewhat inculturated. One of the disciplines â I donât know if this is a habit â one of the disciplines that I have instilled for myself is to â I have, on my calendar I have, literally this is what it says, âcritical distance day.â
Literally once every six weeks I have a day on my calendar where I have prescheduled, Iâm getting out of the day-to-day business and Iâm going to go do something very, very different. Iâm going to talk to consumers. Iâm going to go to a conference. Iâm going to a university campus. But Iâm going to do something to refresh myself to think differently than I would if I were just managing the daily business.
Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. Is there a particular nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate and get quoted back to you frequently?
Michael J Arena
Yeah. I guess the one that I think of is we live in the era of disruption. Weâre all talking about digital disruption these days. We want to talk about things like agile, but I personally believe that in the era of disruption, social is king. Weâre going to be talking much more, much, much more about both energy and social capital as we move forward over the next decade.
Pete Mockaitis
All right. If folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?
Michael J Arena
The book, thereâs a website for the book, AdaptiveSpace.net. They can certainly go on there. Iâve talked a little bit around some different network roles. Thereâs another website out there called NetworkRoles.com that they can actually go sort of take a self-assessment to better understand their own individual network role.
Pete Mockaitis
Do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks seeking to be awesome at their jobs?
Michael J Arena
Stop talking about it and start doing it. Go find a friend. That first friend matters more than you can ever imagine. Find a first friend to partner with on whatever it is that youâre thinking about it is the first step forward. We oftentimes think of things and oftentimes donât act on those.
Pete Mockaitis
Awesome. Well, Michael this has been a lot of fun. Thanks so much for sharing the good word. I wish you and GM lots of luck in all youâre up to.
Michael J Arena
Yeah, absolutely. Thank you. Iâve enjoyed the conversation.