Tag

KF #7. Communicates Effectively

1183: Using Body Language to Strengthen Likability and Relationships with Joe Navarro

By Podcasts No Comments

Former FBI agent Joe Navarro reveals how to adjust your body language to connect better with those around you.

You’ll Learn

  1. The small gestures that greatly impact your likability
  2. How to maintain appropriate distance and eye contact
  3. The one expression to avoid at all costs

About Joe

Joe Navarro, MA, served as an FBI special agent in counterintelligence and counterterrorism for twenty-five years. A recognized global expert on nonverbal communication, he is the international bestselling author of What Every BODY Is Saying and Be Exceptional. He consults for major corporations and governments worldwide. 

Navarro has been featured on the TODAY Show, CNN, Fox News, and other major outlets, and he lectures frequently around the world on human behavior and influence. He lives in Sarasota, Florida.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Pete Mockaitis
Joe, welcome back!

Joe Navarro
Good to be back. Good to see you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, you, too. Well, I’d love it if you could kick us off with a high-stakes story where body language played a key role.

Joe Navarro
Well, how about one where nuclear “go codes” were missing and we had to find who was the culprit.

Pete Mockaitis
That sounds almost too good to be real, like Jack Bauer style.

Joe Navarro
Unfortunately, it was real. Unfortunately, seven nations were imperiled by this. This is during the Cold War period, and we come to find out that all this secret material is missing.

The US Army does a great job, narrows it down to one area and one individual that was involved. They finally arrest him, but we come to find out he had a co-conspirator. And that co-conspirator, even though he agreed to talk to me, I was an FBI agent at the time, said, “I’m not sure I want to get anybody else in trouble.”

So I said, “Fair enough.” So we got the army to give us a list of everybody that would have had access to the codes. And then, on a three-by-five card, we put the names of each individual, and then I just said, “Look, I don’t want to know if they’re involved. I just want to know if you know them and did you like them?”

And so I held the card up and then I watched his eyes. And, of course I hadn’t written any books on the subject, so he didn’t know what I would be looking for. But on two cards, his eyes squinted, and I was sitting about the distance between here and the screen, and his pupils constricted.

And just based on that, we requested that these two people be interviewed that we didn’t know were in any way connected. And as it turns out, they both confessed. So there. That happened in 1990, and it’s in the court filings, and pone of them went to jail for 36 years. So true story. And it was all based on body language.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Joe, you’ve really raised the bar for every guest ever when I ask a question about a story. It’s, like, “If there’s not nuclear launch codes and decades in prison at stake, then I’m going to have to move on.”

Joe Navarro
Yeah, pretty much. Look, I always tell people, it was luck, I happen to be at the right place at the right time. And I was that weird kid who, all my friends in high school were playing with baseball cards and exchanging baseball cards, I was writing down the things that I observed with body language and it paid off years later, so, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. Well, it continued to pay off. Your latest book, it’s called Mastering Connections: Build Stronger Relationships with the Science of Body Language. That sounds real nice because most of us will not be in the position of interrogating someone in a legal matter. But I think all of us want stronger relationships.

Can you tell us just how much of an impact can this body language knowledge make in having stronger relationships?

Joe Navarro
I think what the first thing we have to realize is the mistaken assumption that texting and writing and direct messages is connecting. All that is is signaling.

Connections have an evolutionary perspective. We evolved to communicate first and foremost nonverbally. Our first language is nonverbal. That touching between the child and the mother in traditional societies, even the smell begins to shape. And how often we touch and how we look at each other begins to shape that connection.

And in modern society, we tend to think, “Oh, well, you know, I sent him an email message,” or a text message. And then we see the high amount of individuals that feel lonely, feel depressed, the extraordinary number.

I saw a number the other day that young people entering universities, as high as 36% of them, which is an astounding number, feel depressed or anxious, and so forth. And I think that has a lot to do with the fact that we’re not connecting the way that we should. And if we’re going to connect, then we should do it the right way, which, to a great degree, has to do with how far we stand with each other.

How do we look? Do we stare at each other or do we gaze? How often do we touch each other on the arm and so forth? I just, three days ago, four days ago, I had to attend a funeral.

And once again, it was a revelation of there’s not much you can say but how we revert back to that, our first language, which is, you know, arm around each other, hugs, holding each other’s hands, you know, big men weeping in each other’s arms, very tactile.

And it’s just a reminder that this is our first language, and it’s the way we show love and empathy and everything else.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s powerful. And I think that’s a great reminder that texting doesn’t get it done in terms of our relational biochemical, bodily beings for getting the connecting stuff happening.

Joe Navarro
Yeah, you’re exactly right. I mean, we are mostly chemistry. And, you know, one way to look at it is texting, it’s immediate. You can signal very quickly and so forth, but how often we ask, “Well, what did you mean by that? Were you…?” you know, we have to include an emoji. We have to do this and that.

And, I think, to a great extent, where oxytocin is released when we are in each other’s presence and we feel comfortable and there’s touch and there’s kindness in how we look at each other, versus dopamine, which, “Oh, I got the message. Oh, this is great.” And then you have that little dopamine high.

But then we see people in a clinical setting just crash, and so they’re constantly looking for the next dopamine high, which with algorithms now, you can be fed for hours constant little hits where, maybe, you interact and so forth, but it never achieves what oxytocin does, which is this profound feeling of contentment and joy and happiness and trust.

Pete Mockaitis
So just so that we are on the same page with regard to this oxytocin and connecting stuff. Texting, instant messaging won’t do it. Will live video exchanges do it? Or is it strictly an in-person kind of a phenomenon?

Joe Navarro
Well, that’s a profound question, Pete. I think virtual environment can do a lot, and it does. And almost 90% or maybe more of the calls that I now get or do, I prefer this environment even over a phone call because I get to look at the other person. It helps you with things like turn yielding.

It helps you with things like, “Oh, he’s pondering what I just said. Did I use a word he didn’t understand?” It allows you certain things. I think it has its place. And going forward, we’re always going to be, I think, now and into the future, well into this virtual environment.

But I have to say, at the same time, we can look scientifically at people who are truly connecting. And we see several things. From the Grant study, which I know you know is in the book, the largest study, it continues since the 1930s at Harvard, which looked at people and connections and so forth.

One of the things that stands out is best predictor of success in business was not IQ, was not where you grew up, was not where you went to school, but your ability to connect with others. And in doing so, you got promoted, you got invited to meetings, you got invited to play golf and all those things.

But the other thing we found is that, and young people don’t think about it, but older people do, is yet you will live longer. Longevity is one of the greatest benefits from that.

But it’s also those people who could connect at a very tactile level also tended to have happier marriages. There’s the occasional touch of the hand, there’s the rub of the back, there’s the caress, there’s, you know, the way to look at someone.

For instance, if I wanted to increase face time with you, one of the easiest things I could do is just tilt my head. And by just inclining my head a little bit, we know from studies that my company has done when I was working with attorneys, people will stay with you longer.

So there are immediate benefits to being present, and we haven’t even begun to study how our body chemistry influences each other. We now have research, and it’s solid research, where the amount of stress that we carry on ourselves, right, in the form of chemistry, will actually influence other people around us.

So if you’ve been in an angry situation and you have a lot of cortisol and it’s literally being exuded by you, it actually will affect the other person in the room. Conversely, if you’ve had a nice time, if there’s a certain amount of pleasantness and so forth, that is felt also. And our animals feel that.

I’ve seen animals alert on people. And you say, “Well, where does that come from?” Well, they’re picking up things that, subconsciously, we pick up on, but we tend to mask it. So there is definitely the benefit of the tone of voice.

On a screen, we don’t see the elasticity of our skin. We don’t see the subtle changes of colors when you say something that’s exciting to me. We don’t see the pupillary dilation of, “Oh, wow, that’s…” right? We just don’t see that.

I was just at a conference three months ago, and one of the questions that I was asked was, “What about AI? What’s going to happen with AI?” And my answer was that, “At this moment, we humans don’t even know how many neuroreceptors we have.”

We know that we can see, we can hear, but we know from scientific studies that some people are picking up other things around them. So we don’t even know what these neuroreceptors are.

Pete Mockaitis
What are they picking up? What kind of things are we talking about here?

Joe Navarro
Well, it can be anything from… we see this, for instance, when we study people who, suddenly, go blind and they begin to pick up on movements, they can sense, somehow. I don’t know. That’s what we don’t know.

We don’t know what the neuroreceptors are, but they sense, better than chance, “Somebody’s behind me. Something moved,” all sorts of things. And so my argument was AI, eventually, we can train it to do quite a bit, but we don’t even know what we’re picking up.

And the studies that now have been done with smell, there’s quite a few studies that I’ve looked at where the chemistry that we give off is influence not just the person in front of you, but a whole group of people. AI can never replicate that. It’ll be impossible. So it’ll be an interesting time.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, can you tell me a little bit about some of the most eye-popping science with regard to our stress is picked up by others, it’s impacting them, it’s affecting them? But, like, what is the nature of the impact, of the effect?

Joe Navarro
So I don’t have the experiment details with me, but, in essence, it’s this. They take what are called two naive groups, people that live in a house, let’s say, or an apartment, they don’t know what’s going to happen, they don’t know what’s going to go on.

And then we take one person and they are subjected to an extreme amount of what we call positive stress. So maybe they’re a skydiver.

So there’s a little bit of stress, and it’s sort of positive stress. Mountain climbers are notorious for this. And then we take another person and we subject them to a different kind of stress, the kind of stress where there’s arguing and there’s a lot of animosity.

Now, here’s where it gets interesting. We take their T-shirts and we place them into a house or into those two apartments without letting anybody know. They’re just hidden there. And the people inside those residences, the ones where all that cortisol is at, become more stressed.

They get a little less patient. They tend to be a little bit more aggravated. So they are, without knowing what’s going on, they’re picking up on this cortisol. And part of the equation in this, and I think of my career is, you know, I’m thinking about the times I was on a SWAT team.

You come off of a SWAT operation, high risk, it already takes you two hours to mentally calm down, but you’re taking your clothes off, and I’m putting it in the laundry. You know, “Did that have an effect on my daughter and my wife and in other members of the family? And did that contribute to stress?” The scientific paper says it actually does.

And those are the kinds of things that we’re now finding out about. There’s all sorts of things. So we’re barely starting to understand all of the neuroreceptors that we have.

I’ll ask you something, Pete. Have you ever heard the term umwelt? It’s a German word, and what it refers to is, for instance, a pit viper, a snake, their umwelt is composed of the heat sensors. They sense the world around them by vibrations and heat.

Certain birds will only see in ultraviolet light, which gives them a broad spectrum to pick out very specific flowers and so forth. The human umwelt, we think of is, “Oh, we can hear, we can see, and we can smell,” and that’s actually only partially correct. Our umwelt, well, we can enhance it, obviously, with binoculars.

But our umwelt is actually much broader. We just do not understand it in its totality yet. And in the future, when we tap into that, I think it’ll change many of the things that we do.

Pete Mockaitis
Wow. Well, that’s fascinating stuff, an interesting future. I’d love to zoom in to the here and now a bit. You gave us an awesome tip with that head tilt in terms of folks then become more willing to engage with you or curious or hang on to what you have to say a bit longer. Share with us some of these other cues and things that really boost likability and connection.

Joe Navarro
Just the simple, you know, touching. This is the mentalist, that just touching this area while you’re listening to somebody.

Pete Mockaitis
Like, the chin area?

Joe Navarro
Like, you’re thinking, you’re pensive, it takes you from, “Oh, Joe has an agenda,” to, “Oh, Joe is pondering my agenda,” which makes you more likable. So the head tilt makes you more likable, the fact that I’m listening to you.

Now you have to be careful because if you start doing this, you know, and then it becomes one of these where your hand slips, and that just shows you’re not interested. So degrees matter, but just a little bit of pensiveness.

Reacting to words. For instance, you say something interesting and I react by arching, flashing my eyebrows and going, “Oh, yeah, that’s…”you know? I don’t have to say anything. I just like, “Wow!”

So there’s a whole repertoire of things that we can do. One of the easiest ones is to lower our voice. You say something, I say something, and we’re doing it up here, but then I change the pitch and I go, “Wow, Pete, yeah, that’s really interesting.”

And the fact that I changed the pitch positively affects the other person. That is very attractive to the human brain, and it’s universal. So those are a few of the things.

I know you can’t see it. We were talking earlier about the feet, but if you’re in the hallway talking to someone and you just want to increase a little bit the amount of face time, just by crossing your legs while standing so that you’re slightly off balance, if things are going well, usually, the other person will mirror that.

But one of the things that it does is it conveys, “I want to stay a little longer,” and more likely than not, the other person will stay a little bit longer just because crossing your legs is a high-comfort display.

We only do that when we’re comfortable. We never cross our legs and are off balance if there’s anything in front of us that we’re not comfortable with. So very simple behaviors to just increase a little bit of face time.

Now, obviously, if you’ve got somebody that’s got to catch a plane or they got to go, as you said, their feet immediately point in the direction of that gate and it just says, “Hey, I got to go.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, Well, so the theme here seems to be, or maybe a couple themes, is each of these signals convey, “I am interested in you, and I think what you’re saying is interesting, valuable, intriguing. I care to linger in your presence, in your midst.”

And so it’s, like, all of these things that make us likable seem to be the things that are putting good vibes toward the other person. It’s like, “They like me, therefore, I like them, and they are likable.”

Joe Navarro
Yeah, “They like me, and I like them,” and so it’s back and forth. In psychology, there’s a way to describe that, in saying, “Is this experience positively valenced or is it negatively valenced?”

In my book, I talk about comfort/discomfort. And so, the more things that we can do to make them positively valenced, right, if we were to meet in a hallway, yeah, I probably would be leaning against the wall.

I would probably be asking a lot of questions about, “How did you get started in this? I mean, how long have you been doing this? And, like, when you get up in the morning, how do you know what to ask?”

Because, you know, as an FBI agent, I know that I have to satisfy the statute, you know, “Did he enter the structure with the intent to commit a felony?” So I would begin to structure my questions out of curiosity about you, which we’ve known since 1926, and, you know, how to make friends and so forth, is we like to be asked questions.

So the totality of it is, “Was it positively valenced?” And then always thinking, you know, “The next time I see Pete, I want him to remember it as something positive.” Now here’s what’s interesting. Our brains have two hippocampi, the hippocampus, we have two of them.

Everything negative, pretty much, goes in there and it goes immediately in there. But here’s the trick, or the rub, it stays in there for a very long time, sometimes for decades. And so anytime we meet someone or we spend time with them, we want to put as many of those positive traits in there as possible because the hippocampus will retain everything negative.

And that’s why, when I ask an audience, “How many of you have had a bad handshake?” I mean, I’ve seen people just shoot that arm right up and can remember when they were bullied 20, 30 years ago, that’s because of the hippocampus.

And so the brain prioritizes the negative so that we can avoid that for survival. And so anytime we meet with each other, what we want to focus on is those positive things.

Pete Mockaitis
So we store the negative a lot longer than the positive.

Joe Navarro
Yes, which, by the way, is why you can’t get rid of post-traumatic stress. And you say, “Well, can’t you just think of something?” But, no, PTSD lasts for so long precisely because we have not just one, but two hippocampus. And so it retains all those negative events and you just can’t take a pill. That’s not how we evolved.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so to that end, what are some things we should avoid doing in our body language?

Joe Navarro
I’ll give you a list of the ones that stand out from surveys that I do in my classes. Number one is violations of space. Over and over, women will tell me that the guys stand too close to them. And so then the question is, “Well, how far is too much?” Well, culture determines spatial needs, but so do personal needs.

One of the tests that I do, and it’s a fun test, usually after lunch, when everybody is tired, I say, “All right, everybody stand up. Okay. All right, pair up.” I say, “Okay, find the perfect distance that you could maintain for a 20-minute conversation.” Of course, there were some young people there that said, “What do you talk about for 20 minutes?” Well, that’s another topic. It’s like, “What?”

You know, I’m thinking of the three- and four-hour spy interviews that I did, and they’re trying to figure out a 20-minute interview. I said, “Okay, find the perfect distance. Okay, everybody found it? Okay. Now I want everybody to bend your thumb so that you have this, okay?”

“And now I want you to walk forward that distance, which is about between an inch and a three quarter of an inch.” So each pair walks forward about an inch. And you should see how people begin to freak out. They start to giggle and get uncomfortable. And it’s like, “Hmm, I don’t know.”

And then you realize, just an inch or an inch and a half can make the difference between, “We’re going to have a long, comfortable conversation or one where I feel my spatial boundaries are being violated.” And that’s how sensitive we, as a species, are to our spatial needs.

So I always say, “When you come in, shake hands, fingers down, not forward, it’s not a gunfight. You don’t want to have your finger in someone’s erogenous zone here in the wrist.”

Pete Mockaitis
The wrist? Okay.

Joe Navarro
Yes, you don’t. Never. So always fingers down, gentle squeeze. Nobody is impressed with vice grips. And then take a step back so that everybody is comfortable. And then, over time, you will self-adjust. But don’t go into a fixed position that is violating each other’s space.

And now you’re guaranteeing the minimum amount of time because we know what we feel like when we’re violating space. So that’s the number one complaint that I get that, nonverbally, we do wrong.

The second one that I often hear about is that the person either is staring too much, or not making any eye contact, or looks away, there’s all sorts of things. And one of the things we have to realize is that, especially in the business world, we now have more and more people entering the workforce who are actually on the spectrum of autism, and they will make less eye contact.

And so we have to make adaptations and not feel like, “Well, this is strange or weird. He didn’t make eye contact with me.” We just have to accept. There’s a lovely man, he’s in Europe, really a lovely human being. He always attends my training, but he is on the spectrum.

And he waits in line to come and shake my hand, buy my books, and say hello. But he just can’t, you know, and it’s okay. It’s okay. You just have to adapt to that reality. So we can look at each other too intently.

I’ve had women say, “Well, I mean, this guy was just scanning me like he was a radar over the horizon trying to look at my boobs and this and that.” And you have to be respectful that way. Or you’re talking to someone, and this is one that I hear from a lot of senior executives.

They’re talking to someone, they’re talking about something important, and they’re giving priority to their smart watch or their smartphone. And they just find that really distracting.

And so, one of things that we now tell people to do is, “Put the device away. Let them know that you care so much about them that you’re, in fact, going to put the device away. That it’s just us. And they feel even more valued.”

And then someone said, “Well, what if I’m really expecting an important call?” Then front it. Then just say, “Listen, my wife is going to call me or text me if something happened to her,” and people will understand.

But this relentless need to constantly be looking at this at the expense of others, we just, we don’t abide by that. Because these are valued people and the minute you take your eyes off of them, you’re not contributing to that positive experience.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, certainly. Well, I’m curious, with this eye contact, too much, too little, do you have a rule of thumb or a guideline that’s close to just right for most people?

Joe Navarro
Well, because I travel all over the world and culture factors in, you know, if you get on the subway in New York, and study after study shows that you can only stare at somebody for about 1.22 seconds. Literally, one second point two-two.

Other parts of the world, the Middle East, Latin America, if you do business in Dubai, I’m getting ready to go to Doha, Athens, a lot of parts, different parts of the world, you have four, five, six seconds that you can look at someone.

And then you go to the Nordic countries, and it’s very limited. It’s very limited eye contact. So I tell people, “Just be aware of where you’re at. Just engage with a person you’re looking at, but don’t be staring at somebody,“ because in some places around the world, it’s offensive.

And, you know, every culture acts differently. Businessmen that I coach, and they’re going to Latin America, you know you’re going to go to an office and you’re probably going to, before anything happens, after introductions, you’re going to be served coffee.

And then you go to other countries, Germany, Austria and so forth, and you almost jump into business immediately without those niceties. And so you have to remember is what is preferred locally.

In the United States, we don’t have a need to, for instance, offer our pedigree. And yet, there are parts of the world where, before you talk about business, they want to know about you and your family, where did you go to school. They want to know about your values. And that’s just something that we don’t really do in America.

So, yeah, I’m a big proponent of knowing what country you’re going to, what culture. And even within the United States, I remember covering the Havasupai Indian Reservation along the Colorado River, and there’s other Native American groups around there, and just learning their culture about how they greet each other.

For instance, on a lot of the Indian reservations, I would ask, “Well, which way did the car go?” And you would expect somebody to, you know, point with their hand, but they point with their chin. They’ll go like this.

And so you just factor that in. You know, when in Rome, you do as the Romans. This works great for them. It’s a great way to signal direction. They do it with their chin, and you just get used to abiding by the culture that you’re in.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Very good. Thank you. Well, Joe, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Joe Navarro
Well, you know, take a look at the book and think about the most important connections that you will make, and then ask yourself, “Would I be considered a high school level, graduate level? Or would I be a tier-one person at making connections?”

And I think what you’ll find is we can all do something a little better to make those connections just a little nicer and a little bit more significant. Something as simple as take a piece of paper, write them a hand note, not typed, slap a stamp on it, and mail it to someone, and you’re going to make their day.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, now could you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Joe Navarro
I think my favorite quote is rather impertinent, and I’m trying to think if I should share it because it was from Mark Twain. But he said, “Don’t try to teach a pig to sing. It annoys the pig and it wastes your time.”

And the message was that spend your time with people that care. Don’t waste your time with those that will never appreciate it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Joe Navarro
I think one of my favorite experiments, and it’s one that anybody can do is the still face experiments, and those experiments done in the early ‘80s where you smile at someone and then look away, then come back, smile again.

But on the third time you just hold very still, which is one of the worst things you can do on a virtual call. You must never hold still. And watch what happens. With children, it’ll drive them to cry. With adults, they get very nervous when they see a still face.

And it’s a reminder that we evolve to exchange signals, not to just sit there like on a virtual call, which is the worst thing you can do on a virtual call.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So on a virtual call, I don’t want to have a blank still face, even if all I’m doing is just listening to what they’re saying.

Joe Navarro

Absolutely not, because your brain is picking up, subconsciously, all sorts of signals and a still face is seen as one less trustworthy but, even worse, it’s seen as a threat. That’s the research.

Pete Mockaitis

You know, boy, you got me thinking about the TV series “Dexter” now, and just like, you know, or what. Yeah, I mean, if you think about, like, really freaky psychopath characters, that is one of their go-to moves.

Joe Navarro
Exactly. And, you know, the still face experiments, you can go online and look at them on YouTube, and you say, “Why wasn’t I taught this 20 years ago or 25 years ago?” And you realize, “Oh, my goodness, how many times have I sat there? I’m sixth in line to be interviewed on a podcast, and everybody else is holding still,” and it’s the worst thing you can do.

Pete Mockaitis
So what do I do instead? I just try to, like, smile or tilt my head or…?

Joe Navarro
Smile, tilt your head, nod, ponder, touch the face, anything but not remain still. Yep.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. And a favorite book?

Joe Navarro
Herodotus, “The Histories” by the father of history. I’ve now read it, I think, three times. But the 780 or so pages I’ve read are just wonderful, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Joe Navarro
I would just go to JoeNavarro.net or just Google my name. For some reason, it’ll pop up with my website, and there’s all sorts of goodies there. I have free bibliographies, and hundreds of articles that I’ve written that are available for free.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Joe Navarro
My final call to action is one that I gave at JP Morgan a few months ago, and I said, “By close of business this week, send a letter, not an email message, send a letter to someone who helped you along the way and thank them profusely, because you didn’t get here by yourself. And please do so.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Joe, thank you.

Joe Navarro
No, thank you.

1182: Connecting More Powerfully in an AI-Driven World with Gina London

By Podcasts No Comments

Gina London discusses how to hone in on your presence and purpose to distinguish your communication.

You’ll Learn

  1. The one communication skill AI still can’t replace or replicate
  2. How to train your brain for more confidence
  3. The habits that undermine your credibility and presence

About Gina

From Farmland, Indiana, to boardrooms around the world, Gina London has spent her career helping people find their voice. Founder and CEO of Language of Leadership, Ltd., Gina is an American entrepreneur based in Ireland, a dual U.S.-Irish citizen, and a trusted advisor to leaders across nearly 60 countries.

A former CNN correspondent and Emmy-winning journalist, she now coaches executives, government leaders, and high-performing teams on communication, leadership, and influence.

Gina is an adjunct professor at University College Cork, a columnist for The Irish Independent, and author of Amplify You: How to Power Up Your Connections in an AI World. As AI gets smarter, human connection is the essential skill that sets us apart.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Pete Mockaitis
Gina, welcome!

Gina London
Hi, it’s great to see you. Thanks so much.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to talk about getting amplified, and congrats on the fresh release of your book, Amplify You: How to Power Up Your Connections in an AI World. Could you start by sharing with us one of the most surprising discoveries you made while putting this together?

Gina London
Well, when I started this whole journey, because I work as a communications coach and trainer and speaker, I think the thing that continually stopped me when I first moved in from being a broadcaster and a television journalist into strategy communications and transferring the skills is that it is a transferable skill. Because I thought, “Well, this is something everybody does. And what can I bring to this?”

And one of my friends who actually worked for the BBC when I was at CNN, she said, “Gina, you forget what the rigors of 24-hour news have done for you in terms of your story-crafting and your vocal presence and the energy that you bring on camera is something anybody can learn for themselves, but most of them don’t, unless they have.” Like, you’re going to a gym, you’re not going to just watch a YouTube video and then pick up the trap bar and do it properly. You need a coach to help you.

And so as I was writing this, I thought, “I want to give fundamental but essential skills in a way that’s easy to apply and habit-stack one on top of each other in an incremental, developable way. So I can give people this guide book that they can use to help them power up their connections and their humanness, especially when we got all this AI stuff making us feel somehow very replaceable.

I want to help people to say, “No, these are the tools that anybody can develop.” But it does take some effort and it is a skill. So I’m surprised that we’ve got it all out here, but it goes from the way you talk to yourself, the way you talk to others, the way you show up, and then put it all together in some behavioral techniques. And I’m pretty proud of how comprehensive it is. So I’m really delighted that it’s out in the world now.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful, yes. Well, congratulations.

Gina London

Thank you.

Pete Mockaitis

Could you share with us a cool story of someone who, indeed, amplified themselves, they started from a spot where they figured, “I needed some help,” and then what they did and what the result was?

Gina London
Yeah, I’m so grateful because I did start writing this column. I write in the Sunday Independent newspaper here in Ireland, and it’s on leadership and communications. And so I got a note from someone who had read the column.

He was the CEO of a big engineering company here in Ireland, but he was also, he’d acquired a new company in the UK and he was also requiring something in North America. And as these acquisitions were going through, he was going to be doing a roadshow to meet with the employees.

And he said, “Gina, I’m very aware that I’m a big guy, I’m a serious guy.” And as I was watching him when we were having our initial discovery call, I said, “Yeah, and you’re an intimidating guy. And if you’re coming into my new company, and I’m an employee, I’m going to be questioning, ‘Am I going to be made redundant? Does this guy really care about me? What is happening to my job?’”

And so I put him on camera, doing this, “Welcome, and here’s the vision,” discussion that he would do normally. And then we played it back and I said, “Now I want you to do it again and I want you to smile like your face is feeling like it’s going to crack.”

And the big guy, Steven, says, “Well, I don’t do this happy-clappy stuff.” I’m like, “Just work with me a little bit on this.” And we played that second clip back and he watched it and he said, “You know what? I could smile even more.”

And that’s where that light bulb moment is where someone sees how others see them and they realize it’s not fake, it’s not manipulative, but it is an effort. And if you’re unaware of what you look like when you’re communicating, well, that’s the first step to building your awareness.

And then the second step is let’s have a desire to amplify, not change you, but let’s start taking more control of these things. So it’s not just about smile more, but it’s about, “Are you aware of the emotions of what you’re saying? Have you chosen words that are connecting with your specific audience? Do you have more control over the vocality to support those words? Is it energetic? Is it confidential? Is it thoughtful?”

And then, “Do you have the face and the body and the gestures and all of that integrated so you’re creating a real compelling, connecting,” and in this case with my guy Steven, “reassuring communication experience?”

So it’s reminding people that communication is not just a transfer of information, it’s creating an experience with the big giant caveat that this is not manipulation and then fake and exploitation when you have mutually beneficial goals in mind, and that it’s heartfelt and driven by your values. So we get into that as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, Gina, I like that so much. There’s so much goodness there. And so I like the way you said it with regard to amplify, you know, you’re not some other creature. You are you, amplified because you’re not aware of how you come across. And that is just eye-opening for people all the time when they see themselves on video.

I’ve taken a video of friends that said, “Hey, watch out, you keep doing this thing where you’re stroking your tie.” He’s like, “What? No, I’m not.” It’s like, “Oh, wow, that’s so weird.” You’re shocked. Like, you can’t believe it until you behold it. And he was like, “Oh, well, there it is. Okay. That’s a thing that’s happening. Wow!”

Gina London
Exactly, because we have these patterns and habits of how we’ve been communicating up until now. Most of us are on default. And so we don’t know. Maybe we might have been told, “Hey, you ramble,” or, “Hey, I don’t know what you’re saying,” or, “Hey, I can’t actually understand you because you mumble.”

But then most of us stop right there and think, “Well, that’s just how I am. That’s just the authentic me.” And I want everyone to understand that your self-acceptance and your self-development do not have to be at friction, that you can still be who you are and you’re a great human being and you’ve come as far as you have you’ve come.

And you can also layer on some more intentionality of how you think about the other person, how you prepare for presentations or even just a one-on-one or a casual conversation.

This stuff matters, and I think it really matters more than ever because we are becoming more and more dependent upon Claude and Gemini and ChatGPT to help us in our written words. But if we don’t sound like we write, or we don’t write like we sound, that means we probably haven’t taken enough control of who we are.

And I think it’s really important for us now to be irreplaceable as humans. So human-up your skills, folks. And this book, I think, comes at a really great time.

Pete Mockaitis
Human-up your skills, yes, indeed. When you mentioned amplifying your facial expressions, your body language, your gestures, your vocal tone, and thinking about the emotions associated with what you’re saying, that is the telltale sign for me with regard to, I’m thinking about YouTube.

And if you’re watching something, maybe there’s no face and it’s just visuals, or maybe there is a person. But, like, that’s how I tell that it’s AI and, apparently, I don’t know, maybe the comments are fake, too, but it seems like it appears that many of these people, the comments, are completely unaware that this is not a human being in front of them.

But that is what does it for me, it’s like, “No, that person is saying something sad but they don’t look sad. Their tone of voice isn’t sad. Like, that person is saying something really surprisingly, powerfully insightful, but they don’t look like they’re saying it. It’s just wrong.” And so that’s what does it for me.

And what’s funny is a lot of humans are doing this, too, just before the land of AI. It’s like, “Wait, you’re saying something that’s, like, really a big deal but you don’t look like you think it’s a big deal? So now, I don’t know, is it a big deal or not? Or did I misunderstand you? What’s going on?”

There’s, like, a confusion inside of me when there is an incongruity when things don’t match up, assuming I’m paying enough attention. That’s another thing. It’s, like, maybe because it’s incongruous, it’s boring, and I don’t care, or I was like, “Well, whatever.” And so I’m not even paying enough attention to notice that it doesn’t match up.

Gina London
You are so hitting on the incongruity and the lack of attention span that people have these days. So in the incongruity piece, I have an illustration in the book of a three-legged stool: words, voice, and your body.

And in the body part, I would also include your clothing and your wardrobe choices and your grooming and those sorts of things because it’s all giving that impression of who you are to that audience.

But what we’re talking about is a lot of people, especially in business, more formal settings, like my CEO guy, they’re focusing on the words, but they haven’t learned how to integrate and connect the voice to the emotion behind those words. They haven’t necessarily picked words that are warm or that can be reassuring or connecting in the particular situation to that audience as well.

And then the body language piece, as I was mentioning, if it doesn’t look energetic or urgent or sensitive, there is that lack of balance, and that three-legged stool doesn’t stand as well if one leg is the only one that’s really engaged.

And with your point about the attention span, it’s not that everybody has to be super dramatic, it has to be jazz hands or whatever, but you do have to have that sense of, “I’m in real time with human beings. I’m seeing you. I’m hearing you.”

And this is the experience that is going to make them wake up for six seconds and not go back on their phone or get out of their thoughts and listen to you because you know the sense of urgency, you know the enthusiasm, you know the passion, and you have worked at yourself to be able to bring it so you’re not some slick, impersonal, overly polished and artificial AI slop. We got to ratchet this stuff up.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well said. I dig that a lot. Now, when we talk about these emotions, and I think that’s great in terms of them being a focal point to tie this together in terms of the theme, you know, the dress and the appearance and the intonations and the body gestures.

The emotion is the theme. Like, “Is this serious? Is this sad? Is this exciting? Is this inspiring?” I think some people might say, “You know, Gina, we’re just talking about facts. It’s like, ‘Hey, here’s the report of what happened over the last month. Here are the numbers. Here are some charts with the numbers. They’re just facts. So where do the emotions come into the play here, Gina?”

Gina London

Yeah, exactly. And this goes from one of my very first times I was ever going through TV anchor training, and they do have that. I went into some little studio in Texas with this coach and we were reading from a teleprompter, or I was reading.

And he was reminding me, and this was really important, and I use it with my clients all the time, too. It doesn’t matter what it is you’re delivering. Those numbers mean something not just for the shareholders, but maybe for your job or your bonus or the path of this company.

What are the hopes, dreams, and fears attached to those words? And because I am a positive communication coach, I’m not about being someone who preys on fears, but someone who reassures around fears. But be aware that there’s emotions to those words.

And so that doesn’t make you be overly theatrical or giving fake energy, but it does help you ground yourself. And what is experiencing, what the people who are hearing those seemingly just factual numbers experiencing?

I work with senior leaders who are giving their quarterly reports to the board, or their earnings reports to their shareholders, or they’re doing a town hall to their employees. People want to feel a connection. They want to know that they’re aligned on something that they can work toward that’s going to feed their family.

And I don’t care what topic it is. If it’s worth speaking about, it’s worth speaking about from the heart. And it’s not, by the way, I know we’re speaking in the US here, or I’m coming from Ireland and you’re in the US, but it’s not, “I am American.” It’s not an Americanist thing. It’s a human thing, because no matter where I go, people are wanting to be seen, to be heard, to be valued.

And if you’re the person who’s presenting whatever it is, you have that opportunity to either make more of a connection or be neutral. And there really is no neutral. Neutral is usually read as distracted, not interested, not caring, phoning it in, and none of that is going to build a connection or build trust.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like what you had to say with regard to the fear and reassuring. And we had another anchor on the show, Erica Mandy of The NewsWorthy, who was delightful. And whenever I’m listening to her short audio news program, which I think is swell, she does do that reassuring thing, and it feels good.

Like, if there’s bad news, she’ll own it and convey some emotions, like, “We do have another school shooting to tell you about, you know, last night….” She’ll sort of lay it out there, and like, “Yeah, this is sad. It’s concerning.” And it feels like she’s there with you as opposed to just saying the words.

Like, ‘Here is a thing that transpired.” It’s like, “Well, no, it’s actually heartbreaking and very troubling that this has happened yet again.” And so we’re feeling some of that emotion, but also in a reassuring way, like, “Oh, and our news anchor is freaked out, too.”

Gina London
Right, you’ve got to be able to know the goal and assume the role within the right parameters. If you’re in an anchor position, you can’t fall apart. You shouldn’t probably fall apart and start crying on air.

That said, if you were just dispassionate and just reading the words on the teleprompter, then the people listening or watching you are, “Do they have any emotional investment to it at all? No, they should because they’re human.”

Likewise, in the corporate world, if your sales numbers are down, somebody is upset about that. And if you’re too mean or not caring enough, you’re probably demotivating your employees.

And so it’s really important for people to know that you can set the energy, you set the weather with the tone of your voice, with the eye size that you give as you’re speaking. I had an accounting conference that I was the facilitator of a couple of years ago, “Ooh, accounting. So talk about numbers.”

But there’s still amazing people who are doing those numbers. And the president, as I was spotlighting the different speakers and facilitating the panel and the thing, at the very end, he came on stage and he had prepared remarks, and he said, “I’m going to take a page from Gina, and put my pages down.”

And he actually put them over on the podium and he walked to the front of the stage. And so he spoke from the heart. And I’m telling you, every single person, and that was nothing he’d ever done before, right? And every single person in that conference stood up and gave him outstanding ovation because it was such, for him, it was a big leap.

Now, for somebody who’s more practiced or they’re maybe more of an extrovert, this wouldn’t seem like a lot. And that’s what I think is so important about my book is that it takes anybody where they are, and these little things that might seem like not a big deal can bridge a gap between yourself and an audience in a positive way, which is what this is all about.

Pete Mockaitis
I’d love to hear what you have to say about confidence. Listeners always want more of it. They ask about it. They re-watch episodes about confidence. So how do we have more of it, Gina?

Gina London
Confidence is the outcome after you learn and can apply the techniques of best practices of communication. You don’t first think into confidence and then exude it. You realize vocal projection shows authority, “I will learn how to give more volume.”

Anybody, whether or not you’re a self-described introvert, extrovert, anywhere on that scale, you can learn to project your voice. Don’t rely on a microphone, number one. Number two, posture. Walking into a room with a slow but meaningful pace is going to affect a look of, “I belong. I’m comfortable. Looking out at the people in a room, I can make eye contact.”

Those little tools, when you know that you can do it and you’re practicing it and you’re actually doing it, that’s going to change your feedback loop of how people receive you. So the first position is you’re going to learn some of these techniques.

You might feel like you’re doing the big smiley crack thing like Stephen was when he was doing his presentation practice. But when you start to see how people react to you, it’s going to reassure you and reaffirm that.

So that changes that feedback loop of how you speak, how you walk, how you look, how you engage. That’s going to result in more head space for real-time decision-making around the content that you’re wanting to share or the conversation that you’re going to have.

And that makes you feel more confident as a result. So it’s an outcome. The actions inform the emotion, not the other way around.

Pete Mockaitis
Okie-dokie. So I’m not so much hearing it’s so much a matter of mindset or belief or self-talk. Is that in the mix at all for confidence?

Gina London
Yes, of course. So my book has three main sections: say it, look it, be it. And the say it part starts with how we talk about ourselves to ourselves. So, absolutely, I mean, the first person that you talk to in the morning and the last person that you talk to at night, even if you have a partner or you’re doing a little prayer, it’s still you.

And I think that’s really important is to… we have a section, I have a section, “How do you interrogate the words that you use to talk about yourself with yourself? Are they words that you own and that you truly believe, or were they maybe words that were put there by someone else?”

And if that was someone else that put it in there like a coach who said, “You don’t work hard enough,” or, in my case, a teacher who said I mumbled, are those things that are serving you? Are those things that you want to hold on to? Or, they’ve taken root because they were planted in by someone else?

So we go through that whole interrogation process because I do want you to have positive self-talk. I do absolutely encourage you to embrace the growth mindset that you can develop and amplify yourself. And that is okay.

The same way you develop a better tennis serve or a golf swing or a piano or violin, it’s the same application for how you become a more intentional communicator, an intentional human being.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Now, in your pitch, I understand there are some communication habits that quietly undermine credibility and executive presence. Uh-oh, Gina, what are these and how do we stop them?

Gina London
Well, I’ve already touched on one, and that is the soft speaker. It’s not that if you’re an introvert, you have to be yelling all the time. But it is that a stronger voice, it’s going to be able to contribute in a busy meeting more than a soft voice that people over-speak.

So I certainly do want everyone to feel more comfortable hearing their voice hit the back of the room. It’s not about diaphragm breathing or anything super technical, but it is about matching the breadth of your voice along with that word is going up the top of your mouth, roof of your mouth, back to the back of that room.

And that’s going to help you when you say things like, “I have something I’d like to add here,” as opposed to inside, eating those words, “I have something I’d like to add here.” So that undermines your authority.

Your ability to reach out and try to network within an organization is also something that’s really important. Don’t think that your work is going to be the thing that’s getting you the attention or the promotion. You also need to work visibly, and that includes reaching out to people that might be two layers above you.

Not to say, “Hey, pick me, pick me,” but, “I see you,” or, “I’ve read about you,” or, “I saw you on this Slack meeting or something, and I’d like to know more about you. Could I have a 10-minute virtual or real coffee with you to learn your story because I find you inspiring, I find what you do interesting?”

People really gravitate to being asked for advice or sharing their story. So networking is a corporate-y word for just building relationships, but proactively building friendships and learning how to take more control of your voice would be the two things that I would encourage anybody to start being real intentional about.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m really digging your perspective on the emotional theming of things. And so in my mind’s eye, I’m seeing the How We Feel app, which divides the universe of emotions into pleasant and unpleasant, and high energy and low energy, and then within each of those 36, so a total of 144 possible emotional flavors there.

How do you think about the palatte or the landscape of emotion? Do you keep it broad in terms of, “Hey, these are kind of like one of the five-ish kind of core things on the menu”? Or do you get precise, like, “This is wistful versus bittersweet”?

Gina London
Well, that’s a fantastic question. And I want to also go back and say I’m digging your use of the word diggin’, by the way. That was really fun. And that’s where I think everybody has a palette.

So I would certainly not be someone that would say, “Let’s go through and I want you all to be able to see the same palette of colors the way that I want you to see the way I see them.”

I would encourage you to think more broadly because, when we get into wistful and we get into the, I mean, I think that’s a lovely nuance and I love poetry and I love literature, so I would certainly like that.

But to make it easier when someone is trying to power-up or human-up themselves from maybe never considering it, I don’t want to get into lavender versus violet because I think someone might have a hard time with, “Is it blissful? Is it wistful?” But I do want you to think about the hopes, dreams, and fears. So I break it into three.

And I do also use the visualization of when you’re speaking even a straightforward presentation, there are probably sections within that presentation that are more serious, more uplifting, something to be aspirational about.

And so I encourage people to look at their script or their presentation or their report, like a conductor would for an orchestra. Where are the parts of that presentation that you need to have your voice get a little slower to show some seriousness, where maybe you want to power it up because you’re telling an energetic story of victory or maybe one that’s more disappointing?

When you feel yourself in the emotions of the words, a lot of us can naturally change those, but some people can’t. So I don’t think you need to get into the subtlest, more microscopic, precise nuances of how you would describe the emotion, but I would like you to have the general understanding of where you are taking that audience at a particular time.

And if you are delivering some difficult news, I also would encourage you, “Can you give them a little bit of hope towards the end?” because we don’t want to just be left with our emotions flat on the floor. We want to be feeling like there’s some reason to keep going for some reason.

And if you’re a leader, or even if you’re a colleague presenting to other colleagues, I think keeping that in mind is also going to help you have the words in a particular order and have your voice and your body language and your facial expressions connecting to those emotions while you go on. So you are creating a journey.

Does it have to be extremely nuanced? No, but you should be aware of what you’re doing while you’re doing it. You should also be reading the room, because if you are delivering information, information, information, boring, boring, boring, and the eyes are starting to glaze over and you continue to steamroll through that, you have already lost them. If you think it’s boring for you, it’s completely boring for them.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, well said. The symphony orchestra conductor picture, I think, is super handy because, if you think of a great conductor, they really do, with their whole bodies, convey not just the tempo, like, you know, one, two, three, four. But, like, the mood, the vibes, the feels of the piece, and they’re quite distinct in terms of, like, the slow, sad part versus the fast, exciting part, all those dimensions with the pacing and the volume.

And I think, when you imagine yourself in such a role, it also feels rather empowering in terms of, “This is the art that I seek to create and the emotional journey movements of this piece of oratory,” not to get too highfalutin about it, but it does. It puts you in a good head space, I think, to really consider more dimensions than words, words, words.

Gina London
Than just the information, yeah, because you know, like any of us right now can think about, “Who was that boss that we really liked to listen to? Who was that teacher, that professor that really made the lecture come alive? Who is that person that you can think of right now that you think is a captivating speaker, if it’s a celebrity or a politician or whoever?”

More than likely, they have worked on this stuff. They think about, “Where is a place where I can put some energy in what might be a straightforward, otherwise, presentation or a report or an update?”

I was working in Switzerland last month with a chief medical officer of a big medical device company and very facts, very scientific, all of this, but I said, “You’re saving people with cancer. Is there a story that you can tell?” And I said, “Just give me someone’s first name.”

He got into this whole story about Christopher and what they were able to do and how it made him feel and what his family did. And this is from a very scientific sort of logos-minded, not ethos-minded guy. And it was captivating.

I said, “Now you can pick that little story as an example in an earnings update, in a town hall. You can do that stuff.” And what I’m driving at here is freeing people up to bring more of them, their human selves, into what might be an, otherwise, very dry, factual operations report.

It changes the way people receive you. And people do have shorter attention spans. They do want to connect with people in a work environment, wherever. These types of human skills, you can use them in so many different places. And I think it’s just really important for people to get excited about this and not feel like, “Oh, another set of rules.”

No, it’s you crafting oars for your little boat that’s already out there floating in the river of life, folks. What can you do? You can construct oars or paddles or maybe even a motor and a sail, and you can take more control of how it goes and how people interact with you. And I do find that really exciting.

It’s not just for, “Oh, she’s a natural,” or, “He’s a natural.” It’s a developable skill. And there are tools that you can put into your toolbox. And then depending on where you’re going, what the communication event is, and everything is a communication event, everything is worth trying these things out, changing those feedback loops, and then you’ll become more confident and more comfortable as a result.

And that’s really the keys that anybody can take. But they do have to take them, they do have to explore them and make them applicable for themselves.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that a lot, and this is sort of the theme that’s coming up with regard to you keep your professionalism, well, in certain contexts. You keep professionalism and the emotions and it’s winning.

What comes to mind is so random, but it was a snippet from an earnings call. It was Strauss Zelnick of Take-Two Interactive. And he said something to the effect of, “Things are shaping up to be a blockbuster year fueled by the release of Grand Theft Auto VI, arguably the most anticipated entertainment release in history.”

And I thought, “Dang!” because, here he is, and earnings calls tend to be among the most boring and staid of contexts. And yet, I thought he did a fine job of saying something that’s pretty exciting, “Biggest entertainment release in history. Whoa!” within the same context that fits of, you know, professionalism, earnings call.

And if it was purely, like, reading a transcript, that would feel very weird, “The most anticipated entertainment release in history.” Like, it doesn’t sound like you’re anticipating it that much, bro.

Gina London
Exactly. If you’re going to use words that are superlative in nature, then why not link that with an energy in your voice? And if you are on video or people can see you and face to face, make that face match that, too. So back to the whole incongruence thing, it’s not off balance like that little three-legged stool.

And that’s where I encourage people to power up your language. If you have corporate lexicon that you have fallen into that trap of way of speaking, look at those words again. Does it mean anything to you? Does it say anything to a brand-new employee that’s just coming out of college who doesn’t know your corporate lingo?

If not, then change it, warm it up, make it have meaning. Don’t think that everybody knows what you’re saying because you’ve been saying it a certain way for so long. And if you are saying it with a complete lack of emotion or a complete lack of vocal intensity or energy, you are replaceable.

I’m sorry to say that that transcript can be written by ChatGPT or Claude now, sent out there, and probably read by some voice gen that’s going to sound really slick and have no soul. So if you have a soul, this is a chance to really make it shine and connect to the other souls in the room.

Pete Mockaitis
“If you have a soul, now’s your chance to make it shine.” I like that a lot. And with the professionalism, I think some people maybe have a little bit of fear of, like, cutting loose or getting too emotional. Like, it’s not Tom Cruise on Oprah’s couch, you know, in terms of like, “I’m so excited about this release.” It’s not that, but there’s genuine human emotion present within that professional package, and that’s winning.

Gina London
Exactly. And that’s one of the things that one of my first sections is all about the FAQs, “Well, Gina, what if I’m an introvert?” “Well, Gina, doesn’t this sound like it’s fake or exploitative?” And I answer all these questions.

And one of those things is, “Well, but I can’t just be overly animated, and, well, you’re telling me to do all these things all the time.” Like, “No, I’m telling you to be situationally aware. Don’t jump up, up and down on Oprah’s couch, unless you’re Tom Cruise, because you can, I suppose, do that if you want. But know the guardrails of your situation. But do push the boundaries a little bit.”

If my accountant president had stuck to the script and just stayed behind the podium and held on to both sides of that podium and looked down and just read like he was prepared to do, he never would have had that connection.

And I think this is the wonderful, as we said before, free opportunity for anybody to explore the range of you. You probably have, when you’re with your family or your friends, you’re at a sporting event or something, you’ve probably got that energy version of you.

So don’t switch it off just because you walk into work or you’ve turned on your Teams or your Zoom meeting for that business sales call. You can still bring your humanness to those things.

I worked with the chief technical officer for Pernod Ricard for a number of years, and I can share that because he’s on my LinkedIn page. But Pierre-Yves was very by the book. He was a native French speaker.

He was now, because their company was doing a lot of AI to help promote their market, their marketing and their sales funnels, he was in charge of a lot of that. So he was being asked to speak at a lot of English language native conferences where he not only had to work on some enunciation so he could be more easily understood, speaking in a second language, but he also didn’t want to just be getting too technical on the AI stuff.

He wanted to use stories and even shared more about himself to have that connection with the audience. And we had such a wonderful time that his assistant, who would be putting in our coaching times, even said to him, “I’m so happy when I get to put in another time that you’re working with Gina because I get to see how you progress all the time.”

And that’s really rewarding because people can amplify themselves while still being very true to themselves. And I think that’s the important thing to remember, too. This is not changing you. You are already a fully formed human being, but it is amplifying you, and these are some of the tools that you can use and they’re available for anybody.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well. Gina, now could you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Gina London
I think one of the most important conversations I’ve had is about conversations, and it’s with the wonderful woman who wrote the foreword to my book, Susan Scott. So she wrote a book called Fierce Conversations. And her foundational premise, which is true, is that our conversations are our relationships.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And can you share a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Gina London
Well, I also have the privilege of having Dr. Wendy Suzuki, she’s the head of the arts and science program over at NYU and she’s an author herself and a neuroscientist. And years ago, when I was working in the White House, and President Clinton was there, and this is the only thing that he taught me and nothing else to share.

But there’s a little technique of putting your thumb here on your palm, turning that palm around and putting a pressure on it, and it helps you go from reactive, maybe your face might be leaking something or the nerves might be coming up when you’re getting a difficult conversation, to keep your face and your voice in check.

And I asked Wendy if that, I said, “Is that a placebo or is that a valid thing?” She says, “No, no, no, this actually helps you go from the amygdala point of the trigger response, very emotional response, more into the prefrontal cortex.”

And so I don’t know if it was actually an experiment or a study, but it was validated by one of the top neuroscientists, and that makes me really happy because I’ve been transferring that and teaching that to my clients as well, as a way to keep yourself grounded when you’re feeling like, otherwise, you might leak some emotions that you don’t think are going to build your credibility or that connection.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. So this sounds like an acupressure move, and Wendy Suzuki, she’s a guest on the show, so she must be right.

Gina London
She is. Of course, she is.

Pete Mockaitis
She has the imprimatur of How to be Awesome at Your Job. So let’s review. I grab a palm, one hand, and with my other hand, I put my thumb firmly in the dead center of the palm and put some pressure on it?

Gina London
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Do I hold it for a while or…?

Gina London
Do I hold and how long? And does it make a difference if it’s my left thumb to my right? No, the idea here, really, is to give yourself that reminder that you are communicating even if you’re not saying a word.

So it’s usually used, I use it when I’m going on a stage or I’m in a panel or in a debate of some sort where I’m maybe getting a question that I’ve not expected, or maybe a client is asking me something that is out of scope, and I need to prepare a good response. I want to keep my face composed. I want to keep my pace slow and even.

So this just helps me remind myself to keep that game face on so that I can focus my brain matter not on the emotions and the cortisol that’s coming up, but on how I construct, “How can I purposefully go into my toolbox of techniques and land an answer that is going to continue to build that trust and that credibility going forward?”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite book?

Gina London
In the business sense right now, I’ve read a lot of them, but I really keep going back to The Coaching Habit by Michael Bungay Stainer. And I loved his book because it’s short, simple, and, most important for me, easy to apply.

Pete Mockaitis
Fabulous. And a favorite tool?

Gina London
Well, I won’t lie and say that I don’t use any of the AI bots. I’ve not gotten familiar with Claude. I do use ChatGPT. It’s become a real easy way to write quick emails. And I think, sometimes, when you’re doing, for example, my daughter has just gone off to college, and all the type of getting her into housing and all the follow-up that you do with student administrators and things, that can be a little bit emotionally charged.

So you can give that prompt. The ChatGPT tool doesn’t have any of that emotion that it’s caring about, “Which word should I use?” then it spits out something. But what’s really important, when we talk about this kind of a tool, and this is inherent, of course, in the book and for our own communication as well, is to not settle for the first thing that they come up with.

Look for, “Are those words that you would use? Would you sign off like that? Is it too flowery? Is it not warm enough?” Use it as a skeleton, but you put your own flesh on those types of things. I think that’s really important as more of us are using AI agents.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Gina London
Favorite habit for me is making my bed.

Pete Mockaitis
Alrighty. And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, they quote it back to you often?

Gina London
The fact that you’re communicating always, either by default or by design.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Gina London
You would go to my website, GinaLondon.com, or if you’d like to buy the book straight up, we have, obviously, a way that you can buy the book from my website. Or you can go ahead and buy it at any of the online places that you would purchase a book because it’s everywhere now.

And, certainly, if you want to follow me on any socials, I’m over on TikTok and Insta and my favorite place, though, is LinkedIn because that’s where a lot of the business and professional conversations are happening and I love to be there.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Gina London
Don’t think that you have fully arrived. When you get complacent about your communications, that’s when you start to slip. Your caring needs to constantly be cultivated. The same way I won’t get up and not make my bed, I also won’t get up without thinking about, “What’s my self-discipline? How can I add value to someone else? How can I help someone else?”

So one thing I think, also, is really important to remember is that when you’re feeling self-conscious about yourself, your communications, maybe your career path or whatever it is, the best way to heal that is to get more others-focused. So the more others-conscious you can be, the less self-conscious you’ll be as a result.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Gina, thank you.

Gina London
Oh, it’s been a pleasure. Absolutely enjoyed it. I was digging the whole experience.

1180: How to Communicate Like a Pro in the Age of AI with Matt Abrahams

By Podcasts No Comments

Matt Abrahams explains the pitfalls of outsourcing your communication to AI—and how you can use it to enhance your communication instead.

You’ll Learn

  1. Why polish is no longer an advantage—and what is
  2. The many ways AI can hurt or help your communication skills
  3. How “Costco credibility” helps you win more

About Matt

Matt Abrahams is a leading expert in communication with decades of experience as an educator, author, podcast host, and coach. As a Lecturer in Organizational Behavior at Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business, he teaches popular classes in strategic communication and effective virtual presenting. He received Stanford GSB’s Alumni Teaching Award in recognition of his teaching students around the world. 

When he isn’t teaching, Matt is a sought-after keynote speaker and communication consultant. He has helped countless presenters improve and hone their communication, including some who have delivered IPO road shows as well as TED, World Economic Forum, and Nobel Prize presentations. His online talks garner millions of views and he hosts the popular, award-winning podcast Think Fast, Talk Smart The Podcast. 

His previous book Speaking Up without Freaking Out: 50 Techniques for Confident and Compelling Presenting has helped thousands of people manage speaking anxiety and present more confidently and authentically.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Shopify. Start your free trial at Shopify.com/awesomepod
  • Vinted. Download the Vinted app for free to start selling with no seller fees!
  • Fitnexa. Get $10 off the SomniPods3 with the link and code AWESOME

Pete Mockaitis
Matt, welcome back!

Matt Abrahams
I am thrilled to be back with you. We had such fun last time. Thank you.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes. Well, thank you, and kudos on all your success in terms of the book and your podcast. It is just blowing up and you’re appearing in big arenas digitally, and so I just think that’s so cool. So kudos, the good word is getting out and you’re getting out some more good word with an updated edition of your book.

Matt Abrahams
Thank you. Yeah, it’s all exciting. The goal is to help people feel more comfortable and confident communicating and it’s always great to have conversations on the topic.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, so Think Faster, Talk Smarter. We’re coming out with a fresh edition and, apparently, this AI business is fairly consequential when it comes to communication.

Matt Abrahams
I’ve heard. I’ve heard. Do you find you use AI to help you in your communication?

Pete Mockaitis
Selectively. I use it a ton for research and I love that. I cannot tell how many times I’ve said, “Show me human randomized control trials on the impact of X on Y,” because I was like, “Get right to the real science of the stuff,” as opposed to, you know, what random influencers are saying. And then follow up questions.

So I think that I’ve been having too much fun using AI for research. And with communication, I do it pretty sparingly. It’s usually, like, I’m really kind of stuck, “I want to make this email. I don’t want to be rude, but I want to be kind of assertive.”

But the blunt answer is like, “Hey, this is our agreement. Read it,” you know? But, “What’s the nicer way to say that?” So I find it helps when I have some emotional hang-ups with my language to just be like, “Oh, yeah, that’s just the easy words to use. Yeah, go ahead and do that,” you know?

Matt Abrahams
And I think that’s a wise way to use it. Use it as a check on tone, as a check on vocabulary, again as a partner, not necessarily as the drafter and originator of the information.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, I’ve heard that said very well. And we had Jeremy Utley, understandably.

Matt Abrahams

Ah, Jeremy is a good friend and a colleague. He’s awesome.

Pete Mockaitis
You know, he really nailed it. I don’t remember if this is his words, or if this is from Brendan at The Leverage Class. We’ll put links to all of this stuff, to think of AI as a sparring partner instead of an oracle, or a teammate instead of an oracle. And that’s been very helpful.

Matt Abrahams
Yes, that’s exactly right. That is Jeremy’s language for sure. Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
So that’s handy. So that was one of the reasons you thought, “Hmm, a fresh edition of this book is warranted already,” because it’s not that old. But lay it on us, in terms of your view of AI and how it’s impacting communication and professionals.

Matt Abrahams

Right. So AI gives us an opportunity for all of us to be perfect and polished in our communication, and that’s a problem. That’s a problem because it brings to us what I’m calling an authenticity crisis, where we never truly know if what somebody says is their own thought process, is the result of that, or if it’s something AI created.

If you think about it, communication is the end stop of a whole bunch of thinking that happens. Critical thinking is important and critical in our communication. And if we can never truly know if what somebody is saying is theirs, then we’ve got an issue of authenticity.

So much so that companies are requiring in-person interviews again because we want to make sure no Cyrano de Bergerac is going on, people looking at the screen or getting advice in their ears. Universities like where I teach are bringing back blue books. You and I both remember putting pen in the blue books to answer questions because we’re just not sure.

So we need to, I believe, in a world of AI where polish and perfection are just a few keystrokes away, being able to demonstrate that we’re human and we have thought through our information is critical. And I believe, while AI can be incredibly helpful in being a sparring partner, in helping us think through our audiences, in testing our reflexes around certain types of communication, we want to make sure that we avoid just relying on it for all of our communication.

And there are things we can do to signal that we are actually human in our communication. And that’s really what this chapter, the new chapter about AI is all about.

Pete Mockaitis
And this signaling, I’m imagining, is more sophisticated than removing em dashes.

Matt Abrahams
It is a little bit more sophisticated. If you think about it, I believe that in a world of AI, the ability to speak in the moment, on your feet, and be responsive in an agile, appropriate way is the thing that will set those who are expert apart from those who aren’t.

And so there are things that we can do to signal that. So, for example, we can connect what we’re saying to our life experience. So I could say, “You know, when I think about the answer to your question, it reminds me of a time when…” and then we tell that story.

Or we could, in our communication, tell how we are feeling in the moment, like, “That question really makes me ponder or question this approach.” And it is through those little tells and reveals that we actually show that we are thinking in the moment, that this is us live processing.

And that makes a difference because it allows us not only to demonstrate proof of human and proof of thought, but it’s endearing and connective instead of just rote recitation that many people are relying on.

Pete Mockaitis
You’re right. And I like that so much because that’s very simple, clear, and direct and the AI doesn’t tend to share with us its emotional reaction because it doesn’t have emotions, nor does it share its personal background history stories because it doesn’t have those either. And so that’s very simple right there.

And I think you really nailed it with regard to our live conversational exchanges, quite an impact in how folks judge us because if we look at any number of artifacts, whether that’s documents, reports, spreadsheets, whatever, it’s like before, I mean, we even see this in our business with the hiring for podcast production services.

Before we say, “Okay, well, we’ll ask all these questions, and if they can answer them, then they must be pretty smart.” And then now it’s like, “Well, we can’t do that anymore. It’s because they can just get those answers readily.” And not because the test has been published somewhere, but because ChatGPT can handle it, no problem.

And so you’re right, if the artifacts aren’t telling the story that I’m highly competent, then one of the few things we really have left is the live conversation in which we’re showing off how we think and what we can do.

Matt Abrahams
Absolutely. Communication is about connection and is demonstrating thought and empathy. And those are things that are difficult to do with AI. Again, AI has a place in our communication. I truly believe it can help us be better.

I talk about the empathy paradox. If I need to have a conversation with you, Pete, where I really want to make sure that my messaging aligns with your way of being in the world, I can work with AI in advance and have it help me think through ways of approaching you that might be different than I would normally approach other people. That’s great and that’s a useful tool.

However, if I just outsource all the most difficult communication I have to have, a bad performance review, or a breakup, or something of that nature, you know, empathy is a muscle. You need to train it. And if I just outsource it, I can have empathy atrophy. And that concerns me greatly, especially for younger generations who haven’t had to have those difficult conversations in the first place.

So we do need to take the time to really think through our communication, leverage AI appropriately, and then make sure we demonstrate that this is our own work. You and I grew up going to school where you had to show your work, and this is part of how we do it.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, could you give us some stories that illustrate what you’re seeing with regard to empathy atrophy, or the landscape of us human thinkers, empathizers, communicators, and how we’ve already been influenced or altered by AI?

Matt Abrahams
So let me start with a story that I actually start the new chapter in the book with. And this happened to a friend of mine, a dear friend of mine. Like me, he teaches communication at the university level.

And he was applying for a new job. And he had a bunch of stuff going on in his life that was difficult for him, and so he prepared with AI. So he created answers through AI for questions he knew he was going to get asked. He memorized them. He had them up on the screen when he did the the Zoom interview.

And in the midst, you know, he gave good answers to questions that were prepared. And then the follow-up or the surprising questions he completely floundered on. And it was because he hadn’t done the necessary thinking through process to help himself be who he really was. I mean, he was eminently qualified for that job. Absolutely. He just had not prepared properly.

And this is happening all over the place. An investor I talked to, worked for a VC firm, I coached for a while. And he was promoted because of how good he was as an analyst. He was an amazing analyst. He relied on AI almost extensively to help him with the communication, the slides he presented, the documents he created.

And he was promoted to an investing position where he actually had to engage in conversation, give difficult feedback. And he was woefully inadequate because those communication skills that his leaders, bosses saw in him were not truly his. And he was in a position that he did not do well.

And it took a long time for him to get to a place where he could deliver at the level both his bosses and he expected of himself. So these are the ways that we’re seeing this over-reliance on AI manifest itself. Not to mention the times where people just jump to it whenever there’s a slightly difficult conversation.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Okay. Well, so, Matt, give us some step-by-step goodies that you recommend in such a world.

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, so a few things I’d recommend that people do. One is, as you are crafting communication to leverage the skills that AI can bring to you, the help, use it, as you mentioned, as Jeremy likes to talk about, a sparring partner.

So, for example, if I know I’m going into a job interview, I can have it present to me questions that I try to answer. Not like the person I talked about, to memorize the answers, but just to get through the pattern recognition of answering questions and, “How do I start?” It’s an agility drill. Athletes do a tremendous number of agility drills. AI is a great tool for that.

If you’re going into a meeting with a bunch of different people, assign AI different personalities, the skeptic, the supporter, and talk through with the AI what you would do and how you would respond. Again, helping you with pattern recognition, helping you expand your repertoire of communication in the moment. These are ways to leverage the tool to help.

And then when you’re actually delivering the communication, lean into the things that make you human. Share your in-the-moment feelings. Stop worrying about saying “um” or “ah” too much. These are things that we do in our normal everyday communication that help us connect.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. Okay. Well, so as we’re implementing these pieces, do you have any pro tips, do’s and don’ts along the path?

Matt Abrahams
So it takes time and it takes practice. I mean, the only way you get good at communication is three things: repetition, reflection, and feedback. So you need to get the reps. So if you want to figure out how do you incorporate AI into your communication or improve any communication, practice. Try it.

Do different things. Explore. AI can actually help you. You can say, “How can I use you to best help me in this circumstance?” Or, “How have others used you to help?” So you have to get the reps in. You then have to reflect.

One of the big challenges I have with my students is they’ll get information out from AI and they don’t take that extra step to reflect on the quality, the sourcing, or even, you know, “Is this helpful to me and what can I learn?”

There are ways, and I actually use AI in my classes, have my students use AI to help them. So they might, in preparing for a big presentation in my class, put in an outline and ask AI to make certain parts more concise or make parts more engaging. And then I force them to think about and talk about what the suggestions were.

Not that the suggestions the LLM created are correct, but, “What is it doing in this moment? And can you make a choice to lean into it or perhaps do something else?” So it is repetition, it is reflection, and then feedback. And you can use AI to help you give feedback. You can record things, upload it, and have it give you feedback.

But ask other people, as a result of whatever preparation you’ve used with AI to give you feedback, are you starting to sound like AI? A fascinating research recently released shows that our language choice, the words we’re choosing, is beginning to sound more and more like that that comes from AI. So we have to be careful.

If we all start using AI so much, we’re going to start to sound like AI and lose our way of expressing ourselves. The words we use reflect the thoughts we have and the way that we connect. So, to me, the answer to your question is repetition, reflection, and feedback.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m intrigued by when you said, upload the recording and have AI provide feedback. As far as I know, I hope you’re about to blow my mind with something new, no pressure, as far as I know, they can transcribe that and then give you feedback on the words. But are we also getting feedback on the vocal pitch, intonation, the pacing, like the pausing?

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, there are tools out there that leverage AI that do that. And some of the LLMs generally available have features as well. So, yes, it can talk about intonation, filler words, words of hesitation. And, again, this is all information that can be helpful to you, not to say that what the AI says is correct or perfect, but it’s information for you to reflect on and try and experiment.

A lot of successful communication is about A-B testing, trying different things out, getting feedback. I think real human feedback is essential, but also leveraging tools to help can be a good thing.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, no, I’m right with you with regard to the sparring partner idea and then the reps, and just as a tool for reflection as well. I remember I was working with someone who’s trying to improve on sales, and she was sending the whole transcript of the sales conversation, you know, through the AI and say, “Hey, I’d love your input on, like, what went well, what could have gone differently.”

And, again, none of us viewing it as the oracle of the almighty sales guru who has all sales knowledge, but rather by saying stuff back, you then have the opportunity to respond. And sometimes the response is, “No, you’re totally off base. That was exactly the right move.”

And then, ideally, you talk to an expert as well who will give you feedback in terms of it’s like, “Well, no, actually, the AI was on the money,” or, “No, it’s more nuanced than that,” you know, whatever. But just having something come back at you, just like hitting a ball against the wall, enables you to reflect on that and send the ball back to the wall. And in so doing, you’re getting better at hitting the ball with a bracket.

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, in all the work that I do, I get to travel all over the place, helping people and working on communication skills with people. You know, people define success of communication is survival, “I got through it. I’m done.” And they leave and they don’t think about, “How can I do it better? What did I learn?”

So this colleague who’s, you know, feeding things into a system, that’s a great way to start that process. But you then have to take it to the next step, and say, “Well, what could difference look like? How could I do this in a different way?” And that’s how we improve, and that’s how we all can get better. So that reflection step is really important.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, absolutely. And tell us, what are the tools that will also give us feedback on our pitch and pacing in a presentation?

Matt Abrahams
Well, there are many of them that exist, and everybody has to find their own that works best for them. I mean, I don’t want this to be a sales pitch for my stuff, but one of my students, upon graduation, created an AI coach version of me.

So I tried to get ChatMatt as a URL, but you can actually talk to it and feed in vocal cues and clues, and it’ll give you feedback on things like pitch and rate, etc. So there are tools out there that do it that can help you. But, again, communication is not all just that. It’s the constellation of everything that you do, and the rehearsal, the practice, the thought process, that’s all what’s critical.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I mean, that’s kind of you to not want to turn this into a pitch session, but feel free. So ChatMatt…

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, it’s a thing. Yeah, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
…will provide feedback on my pitch and my pacing in addition to my words.

Matt Abrahams
Absolutely. And it’ll give you feedback on lots of other things. If you’re struggling asking your boss for a raise or you have to raise an issue in a meeting that might be sensitive. My wife actually prefers to talk to my chat bot than to me. She said it actually listens better than I do.

When it was first coming out, we tested it with my two 20-something kids. Believe me, they put it to the test because we didn’t want it teaching bad things or inappropriate things. And with my younger son, the tool actually made him feel guilty.

He asked some silly question and it said, “I am a tool for serious communication development. When you’re ready to work on something serious, come back.” I thought that was lovely. We encoded guilt into it.

So it’s a tool that it’s been trained on my teachings, my work, and again, leveraging AI, I hope, for a good purpose. Literally, the way it’s designed, and again, this sounds too sales pitchy, but there’s a phone number you can call, like you’re calling a friend, and when you call, it will connect to the AI coach once you’ve signed up and everything.

And you can literally just have that, you say, “I’m about to walk into the room. I didn’t expect my boss’s boss to be in there. What’s something I can say that…?” you know? And it’ll respond in my voice. And so trying to use AI to help bring communication to the moment where people need that communication coaching.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s so good. Well, now you’ve got a fun term, you say old-school AI, which is authenticity and influence. You shared with us a couple quick tips in terms of making something all the more authentic and you. Anything else you’d add about influence in the age of AI?

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, absolutely. So in a world of AI, what becomes really important is the emotional connection. When we go to persuade people, it is really important that we not only persuade on facts and figures, which are important, but we also think about the emotional connection and component of our communication.

And that is something that is uniquely human. And we have to think about, “What is that emotional connection? How can I address and make that move forward?” And so we have to be thinking about that aspect as well.

So when it comes to persuasion, you know, some of these key elements we’ve known for millennia. It’s facts and figures, logos, it’s emotion, pathos, and it’s your credibility, how you show up in the background that you have.

I like to distinguish when I teach credibility to my MBA students, there’s what I call career and college credibility and Costco credibility. And career and college credibility is what most of us think about. It’s what’s on our LinkedIn profiles, on our resumes, on our vitaes.

But Costco credibility sometimes is more important. When you go to Costco, they give you free samples of food. Why would they do that? It’s not a great business model unless, when you try the food, you like it and then you buy it. They’re showing you the value.

So career and college credibility, really important. And AI can help you perfect that. But your lived experience, the showing of your credibility, that’s where you can really lean into this emotional connection.

You know, it’s one thing to say, “I won the Sales Person of the Year Award five times in a row.” It’s another thing to say, “Here’s how my sales methodology worked in this particular session, and this is what helped me close the deal.” Very different way of communicating your credibility.

So it’s thinking about the emotion, it’s leaning into the lived experience of your credibility, that’s the old-school influence piece that really makes a difference. And when you partner that with some of the things AI can bring to you, can make a really powerful combination.

Pete Mockaitis
I love that a lot. The ‘show me’ instead of ‘telling me’ of it, and the Costco sample concept. As we speak, I’m looking at my sound absorbing panels in the studio. And I ordered them from Music City Acoustics. And the way they got me was I was just looking up some YouTube video, like, “Okay, so how do I think about echo in this room? And what do we really need to do with that?”

And they showed me this detailed use of a software program and a microphone to calibrate it, to figure out the decay rate of different frequencies, and I was like, “Okay, this guy is a super expert on room echo maybe more than anyone that I’ve ever encountered, and he’s, you know, less than an hour away in Nashville. We’re just going to go ahead and hire them.” And that was that.

Because you get sound panels from a lot of places, but these folks are going to optimally size and place these bad boys better than I could possibly understand.

Matt Abrahams
Absolutely. And that experience you had influenced you, and that makes a big difference. Showing, it really does help.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, Matt, tell me, anything else we really should make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Matt Abrahams

The one thing that I heard the most when I was traveling all over the world is people said, “How do I deal with conflict that sparks in the moment, you know, all of a sudden, you’re having a conversation, and somebody gets upset?”

So I added a whole chapter in the applied section of the book, talking about this, how to manage conflict in the moment. And it really boils down to just some very straightforward, simple practices. First, you have to acknowledge what’s happening, right? You don’t have to agree, but you have to acknowledge, “I hear, Pete, that you’re bothered or upset or passionate about that issue.” Name it.

And then give somebody room to actually state their position. We often go into defense mode and we assume that anybody’s position is equal in valence and significance to ours. And so we have to really listen and understand, and maybe even explicitly say, “How important is this to you?”

I’ll give you an example. My wife and I learned from some friends of ours a long time ago to do this. If we have a potential disagreement, the very first thing we’ll do is we’ll say, “How important is this to you on a scale of one to ten?”

And if you have a partner that you can trust, this is a wonderful way to diffuse conflict. So let’s say my wife, we agree we’re going out to dinner, but she says she wants Mexican food and I would like Chinese food. Potential conflict.

But if she says, “Hey, Mexican food is a three,” and for me it’s a seven, then there’s no conflict. We make this assumption that our partner or partners that we’re struggling with see the world and have the same level of import to whatever it is we’re discussing that we do.

So you have to acknowledge, you have to listen, you have to ascertain priority, “How important is this?” And then you have to do the hard work of figuring out, “What are the ways that we can work together to consider this, knowing that it’s about collaboration and not about competition?”

And so if we can do these things, all of a sudden, in the moment, spontaneous conflict and challenge can be managed much more directly. And then you can rely on some of the tools and tips that I’ve shared with you and others that are earlier in the book around, “How do you structure your information?” You don’t just ramble and list things.

You might use a structure like, “What?” “So what?” “Now what?” “What?” “Here’s my position or my suggestion. So what? Why it’s important and how I think it’ll help us. And now what are my suggested next steps?”

So in any spontaneous speaking situation, you have to deal with mindset and you have to deal with messaging. So the mindset is acknowledging, listening, understanding the prioritization. And then the messaging is taking whatever solution collaboratively that you come up with and packaging it in a way so somebody else can say it.

So, sorry for the long-winded answer, but that’s also another important part of this update and, really, a significant part of how we get better at communicating.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I think that’s very helpful and needed, and that’s a nice move in terms of, “How important is this to you?” And, indeed, you would have to have some trust because, then, I guess you could win every time, like, “Nine. This is nine-level importance.”

Matt Abrahams
Well, with my kids, everything is a ten. Everything with my kids, that’s a ten. So you have to calibrate. You have to calibrate, but it makes a big difference.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, understood. And I also want your take, in terms of in the heat of the moment conflict, I think those are very great. Maybe you’d say, top down perspectives in terms of the issues, and how important they are, and thinking about them logically and rationally and not jumping to conclusions about, “Oh, they’re really mad, and they must have it this way,” you know? So very wise.

I’m curious about some of the, maybe, bottom-up perspectives of just keeping your cool in that moment. Any pro tips there?

Matt Abrahams
Right. So it can be really hard. We can be emotionally triggered very easily around something that’s really important to us. There’s a whole bunch of other factors that could go into it. If we’re tired, if we’re coming out of, you know, the fourth meeting, this is the third thing that didn’t go well today.

So the ability, and this comes from mindfulness training, the ability to acknowledge, “This is how I am feeling,” gives you a little bit of space to do something about it. So rather than being absorbed by the feeling, say, “This is me feeling frustrated.” “This is me feeling really sad by what the person just said.”

By saying those words to yourself, you give yourself a little bit of psychological distance so that you can do something. It gives you just a little bit of space. Also, if you can do something physical, ground yourself, feel the ground through your feet or your shoes, touch something. That gets you out of that emotional state so you can make a more rational decision.

Now I am not saying that emotions are bad. They are very important. Emotions signal that something needs to be done. But, at the same time, when emotionally triggered, it can hamper or actually lead to bad communication. So we need to actually give ourselves a little space.

And maybe the best thing for me to do, Pete, is to say, “You know, that comment was hurtful. And I need to take just a little bit of time before you and I can come back and talk about this more.” Taking that time out for yourself will help you tremendously. It’ll help you get your thoughts ordered. It’ll help you sort through the emotion. And it, ultimately, will help you deliver a better message.

So, you’re right, emotions loom large and we have to be prepared for those, and we have to just name them and maybe do something physical to help give us just that little bit of space.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Matt Abrahams

“No matter where you go, there you are.” It really helps to remind me that the place I need to be at this moment is right here and with the person or people that I’m with, instead of the three other things that I could, should, would be doing. It makes me chuckle a little bit because it’s a little, you know, it makes a lot of intuitive sense, but it’s also very memorable.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And could you mention a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Matt Abrahams
I’ve been talking a lot about language and framing. And so my favorite framing research is very simple. These researchers went to a group of people and said, “Imagine you have a terrible disease. We have a potential cure. It has a 67% failure rate.”

They then went to another group of people, just like the first group, and said, “Imagine you have a terrible disease. We have a potential cure. It has a 33% success rate. Would you like to take it?” I hope you agree, a 67% failure rate, a 33% success rate is the same thing. Yet dramatically, people take the treatment, the imagined treatment, when it is framed as something positive.

And I’m not saying this means you should always frame things positive. What I’m saying is we need to think about how we use language to help us. I’ll give you an example. I work with a lot of people pitching ideas. You can frame a pitch as a problem that you are solving or an opportunity that you’re going to capture. You get a choice.

And you have to think about, “Which way will work best for my audience?” And here’s where you can test it out on people, or you can use AI to help you think through your audience, “Are these the kind of people who are more problem-focused or more opportunity-focused?”

But the way we use words to help us move people in the direction we want to, really, is something I’ve been focusing on a lot lately.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that is intriguing, and I actually want to dig into this a little bit more.

Matt Abrahams

Sure.

Pete Mockaitis
I would imagine, you tell me, since you’ve lived it with so many clients. My hunch is “the problem we’re solving” frame works better if the investors are folks who care passionately about that specific issue, like, “Hey, you know what, my child had that problem. Wow, yes, I am touched and moved and would love to be a part of solving that,” versus if they’re just, you know, money-hungry and return-maximizing investors, “Oh, yeah, let’s talk opportunity.” That’s my guess. What’s the reality, Matt?

Matt Abrahams
I think your intuition is probably right. If people have a connection to an issue, a problem, that framing it that way works. The breakdown that I, typically, see and talk about is, when you have people who you’re communicating with, who are deeply in the depths, the belly of whatever the topic is, people who are deeply financial, people who are highly technical, people who are very scientific, they tend to like to solve problems.

When they were in school, they did problem sets. They didn’t do opportunity sets. So framing it for the way they are in the world, their background, works. But when you’re in sales, when you’re in marketing, when you’re in senior leadership, often it’s about the opportunities that lie ahead.

So I think it’s multidimensional. I think part of it is people’s backgrounds and just how they are in the world, but also, their connection to the topic also makes sense to me. I just am not aware of any research that bears out your hypothesis, although, to me, intuitively, it makes sense.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite book?

Matt Abrahams
The book I’ll share with you, from my dear friend Patricia Ryan Madsen. If you don’t know Patricia, you should get to know her. She wrote a book called Improv Wisdom. Very short, little book. It’s about how you can apply improvisation principles to your life.

So it’s not about getting up on a stage and trying to be funny. It’s about, “In my everyday life, how can I leverage ideas from improv to help me be more responsive and to be more connected and communicate better?”

It’s a lovely book. I mean, this is a book that I return to and I think everybody should give it a read. It is fun and helpful.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool?

Matt Abrahams
I’ll give you an app because I use it all the time. And, again, I’m not trying to sell it, although, I have. It’s called Superhuman.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I love it. I use it all the time.

Matt Abrahams
Yes, it is great. So you know the power of it. It allows me to be more efficient in my written communication. And I am at least 30-35% more effective in my emails, of which I get hundreds, and it helps me be smarter in the way I communicate. So that is probably the most useful tool that I have.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, it’s so funny, Matt, we usually have to keep the fast phase fast, but you’re just so intriguing here. So I love Superhuman because, one, it’s a blazingly fast interface. And it really kind of subtly trains you to use those shortcut keys.

Like, “Hey, these are here. Go ahead and use them. You know what? You’re right.” So it’s super responsive. The shortcuts, I’m grooving in with them. Oh, I like the split inboxes. It can identify a pitch roughly with AI so that they’re just in a separate tab of pitches. So I just go forward them to all of my team. Boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! Boom! But tell me, what are you finding transformational about Superhuman?

Matt Abrahams
So I, as a teacher, pretty regularly, send out very similar messages to people, and they have a feature called Snippet, and it allows you to, very quickly, send out similar emails. That’s the one that I rely on a lot as well.

And their built-in AI, I cannot tell you how many times I’ve used the built-in AI to help me find like, “Who is that person I talked to in an email three years ago?” you know? And it used to be I’d scroll through my sent folder and try, I might misspell their name. So those are the two features beyond what you have said that I use.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I guess that semantic piece really can come in handy. It’s like, “I don’t remember the key word we said, but it was a guy trying to sell me a thing with a video a couple years ago.”

Matt Abrahams
Thing, yeah, three years ago.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s like enough of those, you know, very vague descriptors chained together. It’s like, “Oh, I can work with that.” And then it’s like, “Oh, yeah, that’s the one. Thank you.”

Matt Abrahams

Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Matt Abrahams
This is going to sound funny, but I play darts. So I have an outdoor dartboard, and every day I try to go out. I’ve done martial arts for a long, long time, and as part of that, I took up archery and I found it very calming to focus.

Unfortunately, my wife won’t let me shoot arrows in my house, or around my house, and the archery range is a little farther away. And I found that throwing darts is helpful as well. It helps me be very present, it helps me focus, and I kind of have fun doing it. So that’s a habit that I’ve been enjoying recently.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And is there a key nugget you share that really connects and resonates with folks, they quote back to you often?

Matt Abrahams
The one that I think most recently and relates to the new edition of the book is, “You can prepare to be spontaneous.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Matt Abrahams
I would point them, first and foremost, to FasterSmarter.io. FasterSmarter.io is the source of all of the resources and the show, Think Fast, Talk Smart that I host. I’m a big, big user of LinkedIn. Happy to have you jump on there. And we have a newsletter you can sign up for at either FasterSmarter.io or on LinkedIn, and would love to connect with people in any way.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And is there a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Matt Abrahams
Yeah, so I challenge everybody to take a moment to work on and reflect on your communication. I’ll tell you a practice I do. Every night before I go to bed, in my journal, I will write one thing that went well in my communication that day and one thing that didn’t go as well.

And then every Sunday, I go back and review for three or four minutes, and I make a plan for the following week of how to improve something that I was not pleased with. And that act of doing that makes a huge difference. I’m not saying I’m a great communicator, but I’m a much better communicator because of that.

So I challenge everybody listening to spend some time just reflecting on what worked and what didn’t, either in your communication or others, and think about how you could change your communication for the better.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Matt, thank you.

Matt Abrahams
Pete, thank you. This has been a wonderful pleasure to come back and chat with you. Thanks.

1160: How to Create Trust During Tough Conversations with Justin Hale

By Podcasts No Comments

Justin Hale reveals the key to communicating difficult truths while strengthening relationships.

You’ll Learn

  1. How avoiding conflict erodes trust in teams
  2. How to set expectations that leave no room for misunderstanding
  3. The mindset shift for calmer conversations

About Justin

Justin Hale is an author and keynote speaker who has worked with hundreds of organizations worldwide, helping leaders and teams communicate better, elevate productivity, and build healthier cultures. He is the coauthor of the New York Times best seller Crucial Accountability: Proven Skills to Build Trust, Address Disappointment, and Get Results.

His research and writing has been published in places like Harvard Business Review, CNBC.com, Fox Business, Bloomberg, and Fast Company. Justin’s coaching and advice is also published regularly in the Crucial Skills newsletter.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Pete Mockaitis
Justin, welcome!

Justin Hale
Thanks, Pete. Good to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to be chatting about crucial accountability. Could you maybe kick us off by sharing a particularly surprising or fascinating discovery you’ve made about us humans and accountability from all your research?

Justin Hale
What was actually surprising is how much we haven’t changed. We haven’t learned our lesson. The first version of this book was published in 2005. It had another revision around 2014. And now as my partner Joseph and I began researching and rethinking this revision, and to your point, sort of getting a sense of what the world is like today, there are some places where we’ve improved in terms of our frequency of speaking up around accountability issues and being honest and candid.

You’ll see some of that a little bit in healthcare and some areas, but we’re alarmingly still the same in terms of, you know, allowing situations to grow and build and to choose silence over honesty when we should be holding people accountable to, you know, mistakes, things like that.

So it is sort of scary to think about the fact that we’ve allowed certain disasters or other things that have happened in our world as a result of silence, and yet, those kinds of things continue to happen. So that was actually one big alarming discovery we had as we dove into this new revision.

Pete Mockaitis
So accountability, speaking up, how are we thinking about these things, definitionally?

Justin Hale
Yeah, so when you think about crucial accountability, it’s really about one key moment, which is those moments where there’s a gap between what you expect someone will do or deliver or how they’ll perform between that and how they’re actually performing, what they’re actually delivering, what they’re actually bringing to the table.

It’s that gap between expectations and actual performance that brings about this really high-stakes moment, this high-stakes conversation that’s incredibly difficult and, sadly, mostly avoided.

And so when we talk about these gap moments, what we’re really asking is, “How do you handle them in your family, in your team, in your community, in your society? What’s the norm? Is it to step up to these gaps and to address them candidly and respectfully? Or is it to let them simmer and to hope they just go away or resolve themselves or to sit and gossip behind people’s backs rather than addressing those gaps head on?”

And that norm really predicts so many of the results that you experience and how you handle or mishandle or don’t handle at all these gap moments.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Justin, now I’m thinking about one of my favorite comedians, Nathan Fielder, and his latest season of “The Rehearsal” in which he explores this very concept in terms of, like, co-pilots feeling nervous about speaking up and the dangers. And so it’s fairly trippy because, like, “Wait, this is a comedy, but it’s a reality, but this is a serious issue and you’re bringing awareness. But is it a joke?” And that’s kind of where he likes to play?

It’s like, “I’m bending genres and thoughts as you observe.” But it was quite intriguing. Could you share with us, what are your thoughts on this series and this dynamic with co-pilots?

Justin Hale

Yeah, this has been something that’s been an issue for over 50 years in the airlines. Actually, my father was an airline pilot for decades. And so I’m pretty familiar with the culture that exists there.

But you can even look at examples, like Florida Flight 90, which is about 30 years ago, right, where there’s a situation where we’ve got the captain who’s got a perspective about the weather and whether they should take off, and the co pilot sitting there saying things like, “I could see the ice building on the wings and I was seeing certain numbers in our mechanics that made me kind of wonder.”

And the co-pilot, feeling concerned about speaking truth to power, about being honest to authority, deferred and would maybe throw hints out and say things like, “Man, that’s a lot of ice. Does that seem right?”

And rather than being honest and speaking up about a potential miss or a mistake or a risk, this co-pilot, in some ways, just couched the truth. That airplane ended up crashing right into the river and a number of people died. And that’s one of many examples.

There was an Air Korea flight. There was a number of examples similar to that where there’s this culture of deference to authority, fear of being honest, and that exists. We see that on oil rigs. We see that in executive boardrooms. And, sadly, you often see it inside of airline cockpits.

And yet, about 20 years ago, many of the airlines, because of a few key mistakes and fatal crashes, they really tried to take this more seriously, created this whole CRM program that was all about addressing the conversational culture within the cockpit. And yet, what still permeates is this sense of, “Is it okay for me to question someone who’s more senior than me?”

And so it really is interesting. It is a tragic comedy to really think about how that same dynamic is true in so many areas of life. And it’s interesting because I also think we tend to look at those stories and we put a lot of the onus on the junior person, we’re like, “Why didn’t you say something? Why don’t you speak up? How could you let that happen?”

And yet, the culture of candor or culture of silence, whichever you’re getting, is more determined by how the senior person is behaving than really how the junior person is behaving, right? Does the senior person create an atmosphere where they invite that junior person to speak up, to disagree, to hold them accountable, to call out a mistake, to notice an error?

And we like to say that the health of any relationship, team, or culture is a function of the average time lag between someone seeing an issue and saying something about it. And if you’re talking about airlines, you can’t let that time lag go on too long because now you’re talking about fatal mistakes.

It’s the same thing. We see this, actually, in hospitals. We did a massive study called “Silence Kills.” We interviewed hundreds of people, surveyed thousands of people in hospitals, looking at the prevalence of silence within hospitals, especially relative to mistakes.

And it was scary how often junior people, on a clinical team, whether that be a nurse being faced with seeing an error that a doctor was making, or a more junior nurse speaking up to a nurse manager. And the prevalence of silence was, at least anecdotally, we could connect to a number of different mistakes that were made, which is scary.

Because if you’re talking about airlines, you’re talking about hospitals, mistakes aren’t just things where a project goes poorly, or there’s a bug in the software. We’re talking about human lives. I remember one, we were doing this large study in this hospital and there was this nurse manager who said, “You know, I have a nurse who works for me, who works under me who is…” these are her words, “…dangerously incompetent.”

And so you’re like, “Oh, my gosh. Talk about a gap,” right? And so we said, “What do you do about it?” She said, “Well, after this nurse leaves the patient’s room, I send in other nurses after her to double check all of her work.” And you’re like, “Oh, my gosh,” hand-to-face moment, like, “Are you serious?”

And yet, if you were to ask this nurse manager why and other people like her, in our study, they would say things like, “I didn’t want to hurt her feelings,” “I didn’t want to get into a confrontation,” right? The risks of speaking up were greater than anything else, the feeling of being uncomfortable, the argument, the hurting feelings.

And yet, think of all the risks of not speaking up in that moment. It’s expensive because now you’re paying people to double check work. It’s inefficient. This nurse isn’t getting any better. Most importantly, it’s dangerous. You’re putting a patient at risk.

And so a lot of what we tried to double down on in the new version of the book and gave some examples that were relevant that have happened over the last decade or two is examples where people made this sort of boneheaded calculation where they were trying to, they looked at a gap and they said, “Should I say something? Should I speak up?”

And in their calculation, they start focusing on and emphasizing all the short-term costs of being honest, “Oh, it’s going to be painful. It’s not going to go well. They’re going to get defensive. I’m going to…you know, they’re going to question me. I’m going to be labeled as a troublemaker.” All these issues of speaking up.

And in those calculations, they almost completely ignore all the long-term costs of not saying something, all the risks of silence. And so it’s this terrible mental calculation that we do that results in this ongoing silence, even when it matters most, is really alarming.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, yeah, I hear that. Mercy. And what’s intriguing here is, you know, these scenarios are among the most intense and thrilling emotionally, “Junior person sees life-threatening situation. Will they speak up in the cockpit or in the emergency room, the operating theater?” And yet, this also shows up in more mundane areas, I might venture to say, nearly every day in workplaces that have teams who are regularly communicating with each other.

Justin Hale
Oh, constantly. Think about a simple example as you and a coworker rely on each other for work. And so you’ve got this coworker who maybe is a copy editor and helps you out a lot. And that’s part of their job, right?

And so you say, “Hey, will you review this proposal that I wrote up for the executive team?” And they say, “Great. I’ll take care of it.” And you say, “Hey, can you get it to me by Friday at noon?” And they say, “Absolutely.” Friday at 4:00 p.m. rolls around, no proposal back to you. Monday morning, 8:00 a.m. rolls around, no proposal back to you. So here you go, you’ve got a gap.

Or how about, you’re a sales manager and you manage a group of 10 reps and, “Here we go again, it’s the third quarter in a row that one of my reps is missing his quota.” So, to your point, the gaps are not only incredibly consequential, they’re just common. It happens in our daily life.

I mean, I was having a conversation just last night, my wife and I, with my son, about the fact that, you know, hey, he’s 12, he wants to play with his friends, he wants to go to a sports, he wants to have a good time, he wants to loiter here and there, you know, like classic teenagers.

And yet, what we asked from him is, “Hey, you got to keep up on your homework. You got to get good grades. Everyday you need to come home, look at your missing assignments or assignments that have a poor grade and go back and make adjustments, make fixes,” and he wasn’t doing that. And he has a massive pattern of doing it.

We have a situation with a neighbor who maybe is parking her car on your side of the driveway or on your grass. All of these are gaps. And so, to your point, we face them every single day, some small, some big, some medium size. And yet, if you’re a human being that has any relationships with other human beings, you’re going to have gaps.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. You know, it’s funny when you mentioned neighbors, I’m just thinking about homeowners associations, HOAs, and it’s amazing to me because, and this plays a larger topic that neighbors tend to not know each other.

And it’s sort of a social norm such that I even feel weird, like, I’d like to meet my neighbors, but it almost seems odd for me to knock on the door, and say, “Hello, I am your neighbor. Welcome. I would like to meet you and know you and be familiar with you. And if you need a cup of sugar or whatever, come on down.”

That seems like a very natural human wholesome instinct. And yet, I myself, I say, “Oh, no, that’s kind of weird. People don’t really do that. I don’t know how they’re going to like that. And then are they going to get into my business?” So, yeah.

Justin Hale
Yeah, that’s an important insight, though. I love what you’re saying, because we don’t do that in the same way that we probably used to in terms of building some relationship with the people in our community – small c – right, in our neighborhood.

And yet, you will face moments of accountability or gaps or mistakes or things that bug you that they will do, or you will do to them, right? It just naturally happens. If you’re in a family, it happens. Like, if you’re in a relationship, people will let each other down.

But because we don’t build relationships, it makes having those conversations very difficult and, in some ways, almost impossible. We have no basis of trust or understanding or anything. And so what you see instead, and it’s hilarious, you bring up community, you know, communities and HOAs.

In my community, what you see all the time is just people post their gripes on the community Facebook group. And they just lay into people. And the other day, and it’s hilarious, because they’ll weave it into politics in the most cutting ways.

The other day, someone was complaining about the local school, “It’s the last straw with the school. Let me tell you my story.” And I’m thinking to myself, “You know who you should probably address that with? The school.”

And so we’ve become accustomed to this very indirect complaining, gossiping, shouting our frustrations to the social media world, and rarely do we go in person, face-to-face, to the person we have real concerns with who can actually do something about it and have the honest conversation.

And maybe we end up getting there, but we start with complaining and shouting into social media. And the problem becomes is we build up this emotional distance between us and the person in which we need to have the conversation with.

Same issue you’re talking about with neighbors. When I don’t know you, I have no relationship with you, we haven’t connected on something common, we haven’t talked about our kids and shared a little story, “Oh, you’re a fan of this team. I’m a fan of this team. You grew up there? So did I.”

That commonality builds relationships. And why does that matter? Because if you ever want to talk with someone about issues, having a relationship of trust allows that very crucial conversation to go much more effectively when you believe certain things about each other’s intent.

I mean, this is sort of a principle that is weaved throughout the entire book. That if people can feel psychologically safe, you can talk with them about almost anything. But when they don’t feel that way, it doesn’t matter how flowery or how well spoken you are, they don’t want to hear it. No matter if what you’re saying is true about their mistake or not, if they don’t feel psychologically safe with you, they don’t want to hear it.

And that doesn’t mean always comfortable, but it means safety is a function of intent, not content. Meaning, whether someone, a neighbor or someone in your community, is willing to hear you speak up about your concerns or hold them accountable, is all about their belief in your intent.

If they believe your intent is good and you’re trying to help or you’re trying to address some common interest or that you respect them, and so you respect them enough to share this feedback with them, they’ll be much more likely to hear you.

But if they believe that your intent is malicious, or you’re trying to hurt them, or you’re a threat to their goals, or that you don’t respect them, it doesn’t matter how nice you say it, they will shut down, they’ll go into self preservation mode, right?

And so it really is, I think you make a great point around safety, around building a relationship. In the book, we state it this way, we say when people feel safe, they’re more likely to embrace uncomfortable truth. And when they embrace uncomfortable truth, they’re much more likely to take responsibility.

And that’s really what we’re after, is that we want people to just own up to their mistake. And, honestly, that’s so rare that when we see it, we’re like, “Oh, thank you. I’m good.” And our respect for them goes up immediately.

And so that idea of, when people feel safe, they’re more likely to embrace uncomfortable truth. And when they embrace uncomfortable truth, they’re more likely to take responsibility.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yes, these are good solid principles and they resonate in terms of being true, that widespread complaining indirectly on the HOA Facebook or to the HOA presidents, often, I think folks hear revelations in an exit interview. It’s like, “Oh, I had no idea that was the thing that you wanted, or that was troublesome for your work experience this whole time.”

So that’s sort of the lay of the land, the core principles, and the problem. So what are some of the best practices you suggest for folks who want to shrink gaps between expectations and performance so that we’re getting great performance and rocking these conversations, no problem?

Justin Hale
There’s two views we can look at this through. Let’s start with the leader and then we’ll go to the employee. And if you want to be, you’re talking about being awesome at your job, if you want to be an awesome leader, like a great manager, someone who is rare out there, you need to focus on clarity. I mean, that is just such an underrated skill when it comes to leadership.

And what I mean by that is so many of the gaps that leaders find themselves dealing with started at the moment where the expectation was set. And it wasn’t the employee’s fault, it was the leader’s fault. Meaning, maybe they say something, maybe you and I are meeting in a quarterly review or something and I say, “Hey, look, Pete, you’re doing a great job in general.”

“And I know you want to grow to this next role, you’re looking for that promotion, I want to help you get there. What I’d like to see you do more in the next quarter as you’re in these project meetings and working with the marketing department and all these kinds of things, I want you to be more collaborative, okay? If you can do that, I see great things for you.”

And you shake your head and go, “That sounds really nice,” and you walk away. Right away, we probably have a gap. Why? Because what in the world does collaborative mean? “Do you mean you want me to be friends with these people? Do you mean you want me to attend certain meetings I’m not attending? Do want me to, you know, go visit and meet one on one with certain people I’m not visiting with and meeting with one on one right now? What in the world do you mean by collaborative?”

Or maybe I say, “Hey, listen, you’re really technically solid in your job, but the part of your job I want you to get better at is I want you to be, I don’t know, I want you to be just take more initiative, right? Like, I really want to see you be a go-getter this year, and then that’s really where I want you to improve.” And, like, boom, right off the bat, we’ve got a gap. Why?

Because leaders use these vague terms, you know. “Take initiative and be more responsible and be a team player and be more collaborative.” And in their mind, they have a picture of what that looks like, but they don’t spell it out. They use these vague sort of, you know, business school terminology that sounds nice.

Pete Mockaitis
“You should be more synergistic, Justin.”

Justin Hale
Yeah, exactly, right? “Let’s take this offline and be more synergistic,” right? It’s those kinds of things. And the employee walks away from the conversation with their own understanding of what they think that means. And there’s a high likelihood that those two understandings are different.

And so right off the bat, we have a gap from the beginning, which grows wider and wider as time goes on between what the leader wanted and what the employee thought they wanted. So first big tip here is, if you’re a leader, get crystal clear about what you want, get behavioral. “You can’t be too specific,” is what I tell people in terms of your expectation.

Another tip that I found helpful, one leader that I worked with was excellent at this. We have a meeting, she’d talk about expectations, and then she would just send an email to me within a few hours, like sometime that day, and she would just simply say, “Hey, I’m not sending you this to micromanage you. I’m just sending this because I don’t want you to feel unclear, and I don’t want you and I to ever be on different pages. So my understanding is, from the chat we just had a couple hours ago, is that we’re going to do X, Y, and Z by this date. Is that how you see it?”

And it just gave me a chance to review her understanding of the expectation and for me to either say, “Oh, I actually saw that a little differently.” And then to come back with my understanding, or to say, “Yep, that’s how I understood who was going to do what by when and how we were going to follow up and all that stuff.” And then, boom, it’s locked in. And it’s also documented.

And if you do it in a very, like, simple, informal way, it doesn’t have to feel weird. And, by the way, you’re doing it for them, for the employee. You’re doing it for both of you to be on the same page. So that’s a huge first tip is, as a leader, you’ve got to create a ton of clarity.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, and I love that in terms of getting super specific and behavioral, like, “What does it mean to be collaborative, to have initiative, to be proactive, to be strategic, to have ‘executive presence’?” There’s dozens of things that any of those could mean. Could you share a few examples of going from vague adjective to specific behaviors that paint the picture?

Justin Hale

Yeah, a really common one is take initiative. And it’s because what leaders really want is their people, they say, “I want you to be proactive.” What they’re really looking for is, “Hey, when you’re asked to do something, get clear on what the action is, and I want you to take it, right?” That’s essentially what they’re saying.

So one way to be proactive, say something like, “Hey, I’d you to be more proactive.” The employee might say, “What do you mean by that?” And the leader could say, “Hey, when we’re at the end of a meeting, and you’re unsure if you’re supposed to do anything relative to the meeting, I just want you to ask a question which is, ‘Hey, group, just double checking. Do I have any next actions? And if so, when do I need to finish them by?’”

“I want you to just ask those two questions. And then if you’re given assignments, I want you to make sure you capture those somewhere not in your mind. And I want you to focus on completing that next action by the due date. And when you show up to the next meeting, just give a quick 30-second report back on where you’re at with that. That’s it.”

“If you do that one small thing, to me, that is a great representation of being proactive relative to our team and our projects and all these kinds of things. I want to see you do that more often.” Or it might be an example of saying, “I want you to be more proactive,” and the employee says, “What do you mean?”

And they say, “Well, you’re leading these meetings. And so what I want you to do is I want you to create an outline for the meeting in terms of how you’re going to spend your time. And I want you to put that in the meeting invite to the rest of the team so that everyone knows why they’re coming, and what we’ll be talking about during that meeting. So I’d like you to be more proactive around meetings and discussions and conversations by doing that action.”

So it’s really about taking any vague, you know, trope that leaders are used to giving, and really saying, “Okay, what would that look like? What would you see people do behaviorally that would be a manifestation of that attribute that you’re looking for?”

“I want you to be more collaborative. Okay, what I mean by that is, you know, I want to see you work more closely with the sales team. So I want you to set up an ongoing once a month meeting with the sales director, Tim, and I want you guys to meet once a month to talk about gaps he may be seeing and how you guys are providing resources for them and any feedback you might have for the sales team in terms of using the resources you’re creating for them. That’s how I want you to be more collaborative moving forward with the sales team.”

Pete Mockaitis
You know, it’s intriguing. In some ways, as you spell out these actions, it almost feels as though this is a conversation with a more junior employee, but I suppose it could also very well apply to folks who are deep into their careers.

Justin Hale
Absolutely. The thing that we continue to see over and over again in this work that we do is that people that are senior will often say, “Yeah, this is common sense,” or, “I need to be holding these conversations.”

But common sense is not common practice, right? And you don’t just automatically become better at these as you become more senior in your career. Actually, often the opposite is true, which is sad. People become, they start to really get good at being bad at these kinds of conversations, right?

They develop early in their career poor habits and they think those work because maybe they’re technically successful, and so they’ve been successful in spite of the fact that they’re poor at these conversations. They think they’re good at them because, hey, they’ve risen in their career.

And so, yes, it is essential for you to be crystal clear. Actually, one of my colleagues, David Allen, who’s the author of Getting Things Done, he talked about, you know, one of the zeros and ones of that methodology, that productivity methodology that he would say is outcome and action thinking.

And it actually came from years and years of working with executives, where you’d be sitting with, you know, he and his colleagues would be sitting with executives in meetings, and they’d say, “What are you dealing with?” And they’d say, “Well, we have the same problems this year as we had last year.”

And they’d say, “Let’s do a simple exercise.” And these are with high powered executives of Fortune 50 companies, that kind of stuff. And he’d say, “Okay, I want each of you to take a second and grab a piece of paper and I want you to take your biggest concern and write it down on a piece of paper.”

And they’d all write it down, their own individual large concern, the thing that’s keeping them up at night. And he’d say, “Okay. What’s your desired outcome? What would have to be true for you to say that this concern was resolved or solved or completed or taken care of? Paint that picture for me. Write it down on the paper. What would have to be true?”

And they would, essentially, be spelling out their desired outcome in more clear terms. And then he’d say, “Okay, if we ended the meeting right now, this executive offsite, and you had nothing else to do in your world, except for start moving on closure on this thing, what would I watch you do? What would be your next action?”

“Would it be to pick up your phone and make a phone call? Would it be to schedule a meeting? Would it be to draft an email? Would it be to open up a PowerPoint and begin creating a proposal? What would I watch you do?”

And these experienced, decades of experienced executives, would finally get dislodged from months and sometimes years of procrastination, putting things off, spinning their wheels on large problems that were the same problems as they had last year, simply because they couldn’t get beyond.

I mean, these are people who, you know, leaders are often very good at being strategic. But what they’re often not good at is getting into the minutia of, “Okay, what’s the next action? What’s the next step? What are you going to do? What would that look like? Tell me more about what your next step is, right? Don’t just tell me about your goals.”

They obsess over goals. They meet over goals. They fly all over the world and go to these resorts to talk about, “What are our goals? What are our goals? What are our goals?” And yet, they often stay stuck because they can’t get down to the specifics of, “What’s the next action?”

And so, to your point, these are conversations, when it comes to gap moments and accountability, where you can’t be too specific no matter the level of the person you’re talking to. I mean, this is something we see all the time, by the way.

We talk in the book about examples where employees should use these skills to hold their leaders accountable. Do leaders ever make mistakes? Does your boss ever let you down? I’m sure he or she does all the time. And you should be able to use these skills as well.

And that specificity becomes even more important when you say to your boss, “Hey, look, I’ve been noticing some of the ways that the meetings have been going. I just feel like we’re not getting a lot accomplished.” And they say, “Okay, I’ll get better at that.”

And you say, “Well, let me give you some more specifics. What I mean by that is I’ve often found there’s a pattern. We spend the last 20 minutes just talking about processes rather than talking about action. And I feel like we’re having meetings because we didn’t actually establish clear action. And so we’re having more meetings than we need to. And I want to talk about how we can get better at that.”

This is employee initiating that conversation. So I think you’re right. This principle goes from the first-time intern to the senior executive.

Pete Mockaitis
I love that. And David Allen has been on the show a couple of times, and “What’s the next action?” is such a power question to cut right through things and get them moving. So great principles there in terms of super clear on what the expectation is, down to the next action, the specific behaviors. What are some other core principles here?

Justin Hale
Yeah, so there’s a few. I don’t know if your listeners have ever seen the movie “Groundhog Day,” classic Bill Murray, I mean, it just never goes out of style. But there’s this phenomenon we like to call living Groundhog Day in your accountability conversations.

Meaning, so often, we are holding the same conversation over and over again, we’re living Groundhog Day. And people come to me and complain about this all the time, like, “I’m hitting my head up against a wall, Justin, because I keep having the same conversation over and over again. It’s not getting better. The gap is not closing.”

And I’ll often be honest with people, and say, “That’s on you. That’s actually your fault. If you’re having the same conversation over and over again, the problem isn’t them, it’s you.” Like, “Oh, what do you mean?” “What I mean is you’re having the wrong conversation. So before you even open your mouth, you’ve got to get really clear about what the real gap is, what the issue is.”

We have this really powerful skill called CPR. It’s an acronym that stands for content, pattern, relationship. It’s a great diagnostic tool. So, essentially, you look at a situation, say, “Oh, I’ve got a gap.” And I would say, “Okay. Well, is it a one-time issue? Meaning this mistake has happened only once.”

That would be a content conversation, “Hey, I noticed you missed this one deadline today,” one time. Most of the time, though, people are frustrated, not because something has happened once, but because it’s a pattern, P, right, because it’s happened three or four or five times.

The issue isn’t today’s episode of the mistake. The issue is the last four episodes of the mistake. And the problem that we run into, one of the reasons we live out Groundhog Day, is because we go to hold the accountability discussion, we go to address the gap, and we talk about the most recent episode, and the person has a good reason for why they made the mistake or they had that miss.

And so we say, “Oh, that excuse, makes mistakes” and we walk away and we feel initially resolved. But then two or three days later, we’re back in the same conversation again, and we’re, like, flabbergasted. Why? It’s because in that moment, you were holding the wrong conversation. The issue wasn’t yesterday’s episode. The issue was the fact that it’s happened four or five times.

So let’s say I’ve got an issue with someone who shows up late to work, and we work in an environment where they need to be on time because we’ve got patients coming in or customers coming in or something like that. And this person has shown up late five times in the last month.

And I go to them and say, “Hey, I noticed yesterday you were late.” And you go, “Oh, my gosh, you wouldn’t believe what happened to my son. We had to take him to the hospital.” And you’re like, “Oh, my gosh, I feel so bad.” And you’re like, “I’m so glad your son’s okay.” And you’re good and you walk away.

You haven’t really resolved the real issue. The real issue isn’t yesterday’s episode. The real issue is it’s happened five times. And so it would be the equivalent of having like a dandelion weed in your front yard, your beautifully manicured grass.

And you walk out of your front door and you say, “Oh, what an ugly weed,” and you walk over and you rip the top off and throw it away and you tell yourself, “I took care of it,” which we know is a lie. It’s going to grow back because of the roots. That’s a great metaphor for thinking about conversations.

If a situation has persisted, if a gap has gone on for a while and your frustration is growing, unless and until you address that pattern, or you address the deepest level, which is the R, or relationship, how the relationship’s being impacted or trust is being broken, or respect is being strained, until you address a deeper level of the conversation, the ongoing issue and how it’s affecting your relationship, until you address the root, that gap will not go away. That gap will not close.

So the first skill we really teach people is choose the right conversation. Is it a content issue, one time? Is it a pattern? Or is it a relationship-level issue where trust is an issue or competence is coming into question or there’s a respect concern?

And so many of us would benefit from holding the right conversation, even if we hold it awkwardly or imperfectly. If we’re talking about the right issue, we’re much more likely to get unstuck.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s great. And it really does seem quite easy to get sidetracked, distracted by the one-off, the exceptional, and then you’re kind of lost.

Justin Hale
That’s the 200 level of this skill, right? That’s where that comes in. If you’re a leader and you come up and say, “Hey, I want to talk to you about something that I’ve noticed, there’s this pattern,” and you start talking about the pattern.

And what often happens is that person wants to suck you back into content. You can’t fall for that. To your point, you’ve got to stay focused on the real issue. If someone says, “Oh, but…” Say, “Look, I understand that there may have been an extenuating circumstance, but that’s not my real concern. My real concern is that this has happened five or six times. My issue is the pattern.”

And so, to your point, that’s where the advanced portion of this comes in is you’ve got to both notice what the right conversation is and have some fidelity to that as the conversation progresses.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, can you share with us some best practices for actually doing the conversation?

Justin Hale
Yeah. So once you know what you need to talk about, you’re in a really great place. One quick tip for when it’s time to start the conversation, which is a skill we teach called describe the gap, which is simply state the facts related to what you expect and what you’d observed. Most people begin these conversations with emotion, with conclusions.

Pete Mockaitis
“I was really worried when I noticed this. I felt disappointed, sad, angry, frustrated.”

Justin Hale
Hurt. Yeah, frustrated, right? And so, because that’s what’s front of mind to us is the impact of their behavior. And so we want it to be front of word, meaning it’s the first thing out of our mouths. And that is the last thing you should do.

These conversations will inevitably go poorly when you start with emotion, assumptions, conclusions, judgments. Don’t do that. Now, I’m not Pollyanna. I get that you’re frustrated. I get frustrated. I’m not saying you’re not going to be frustrated about gaps, about mistakes that people make. You will be. But if you lead with that frustration, they will get defensive.

So even before you open your mouth, there’s a little bit of a pre-skill here, which is, it’s actually funny because I’ll have people come to me and say, “You know, I’m really frustrated about this. I need you to help me. Give me some coaching and some training on my body language. I want to make sure I don’t come off as frustrated.”

And I’ll laugh and say, “You want me to teach you how to lie, essentially? You want to be bubbling underneath the surface and angry and frustrated, but you want me to teach you how to pretend that you’re not? No, I’m not doing that, right? What you need to do is get at the source, right?”

Your emotions and frustrations are actually not a function of what the other person has done. You think they are because you say things like, “He pushed my buttons,” “She makes me so mad.” What we know from the science is that your emotions are a function of the story you tell yourself about what other people are doing.

So if you look at the brain, the way it works is, is it’s kind of an interesting four-step process when you go from observing something to acting. First, you see, hear, and observe something. Maybe you’re sitting in a meeting and you hear someone say something, right? There’s the observation, there’s the fact.

Then what your brain does is your brain makes a judgment. It wants to make sense of what you just saw. It comes to conclusions, it makes judgments, it makes assumptions, it fills in blanks. It essentially adds color to the situation you just saw. And much of that story, we would call it, is based on previous experiences, your own paradigms, your own mental models, right?

That story then drives your emotion, “Is what I just saw and heard good or bad? Is it negative or positive? Do I like it? Not like it? How do I feel about this?” And then how you feel, that emotion then drives your action.

So this is what we call the path to action. You see something or observe it, you tell a story, you feel a certain way, and then you act. And yet, your brain does that four-step process like that. I mean, it’s like lightning, right?

Now, why should people care about this when it comes to starting conversations? That was your question. If your story about why someone has done what they’ve done is something like this, “They don’t care. They’re lazy. This is not a priority to them. They’re just out to get me.” If that’s your story, can you guess what your emotion’s going to be?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, you’ll be angry and resentful and frustrated, all the things.

Justin Hale
All that stuff. You will come in with this judgment which will show on your face, your tone, all that stuff. You are screwed from the beginning. I mean, period, right? No matter how much you try to say it in the most refined words, your emotions will show in all the nonverbals, and they’ll get defensive, right?

And so what you’re trying to do here, the biggest threat to progress before a conversation happens is disgusted certainty. This judgment that the other person is this certain way or their intent is this. And then you latch onto that with this certainty that you’re right, that your story is correct. We tend to believe that our stories are facts.

And so, but when you can challenge that with determined curiosity, when you can challenge your story, I’m not saying be Pollyanna and say, “Well, I’m sure that they made this mistake for a good reason. I’m going to let it go,” nope. That’s not what I’m saying.

What I’m saying is challenge your story by asking questions like, “I wonder, you know, why would a reasonable, rational, decent person do what they just did?” or, “I wonder if there’s some circumstances I’m not totally aware of that might be contributing to the situation?” or, “I wonder if I did anything to contribute to this. What’s my part in this?”

When you start asking some of those questions, what you are doing, essentially, is you are interrogating your own story because our stories tend to be pretty self-serving. They tend to be pretty one-sided. And when you ask questions, you start to make your story consider other options, “Maybe I’m not 100 % certain what’s going on. Maybe there is something more to this. I’m not sure.”

You see what I’ve done here? I haven’t become more certain about some Pollyanna positive outcome. I’ve just become less certain about my initial disgusted belief. And so now I’m more curious and my story is like, “Hmm, I wonder what’s going on here? I ought to go ask. I’m going to go have a conversation.” You’ve now replaced a disgusted certainty with determined curiosity.

So back to your initial question, “How do I start a conversation?” You begin the conversation with an attitude of determined curiosity, “I’m going to go find out. I know here’s what I’ve seen. I’m going to go find out why. I’m not 100% sure. Sure, I have a little bit of my beliefs in my back of my mind but I’m not sure that those are factual. I’m going to go ask some questions.”

And when you’re ready to start, now it leaves you space to be a human being. It leaves you a space to fumble a little bit. You don’t have to say things perfectly. Why? Because it shows on your face that you are legitimately curious. You’re like, “Hey, I want to check something out with you here,” versus, “I can’t believe you did this.” Can you feel the difference, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Totally.

Justin Hale
So once you’re ready to start, then you can describe the gap. You can say, “Hey, here’s the facts. Hey, you and I discussed last week that you would, you know, finish this report analysis for me and send it to me by Monday. It’s Tuesday afternoon, I haven’t gotten the report yet. What’s up?” That’s it.

Because the beginning of these accountability discussions is an initiation of a longer dialogue. It is not holding court, giving out the judgment all in one statement. It is simply stating the facts related to the expectation, the facts related to the observation in terms of the actual performance, and it’s just asking a question. That’s it, open-ended. And we’re trying to just initiate the beginning of a dialogue.

And when you open like that, you are much more likely to get honesty rather than hiding or skirting or lying about the truth about what’s going on.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s great. Okay, so we’ve done some pre-work, got the curiosity going, we simply describe what’s up instead of leading with emotions. Any other pro tips for the actual conversation?

Justin Hale

In that situation, if you do those things, here’s our experience, 95% of the time, you will get to a dialogue, they’ll be honest with you about what’s going on, and then you can just talk. You can talk about, “Oh, here’s what got in the way, and here’s why I missed it.”

And, “Okay, let me help you solve for that. And in the future, can you please speak up to me a little earlier when you run into that kind of barrier. And, great, and we’re moving on towards solutions.” Sometimes, though, maybe we don’t do a great job of starting, we don’t get our emotions right, and the person gets defensive.

And so now you’re talking about restoring safety, “What do I do in the middle of the conversation? What do I do in the middle of the conversation when the other person doesn’t jump into the dialogue? They start shutting down. They start blowing up. They start getting frustrated. How do I address that issue?”

And we teach the skill called “Make it safe.” Now, what does that mean? That does not mean make it comfortable. That doesn’t mean that giving feedback and talking about gaps is always touchy-feely and it’s always so comfortable.

I have gotten some of the toughest feedback in my career that I was willing to hear that was incredibly uncomfortable. And yet, I wanted to hear it. Why? Because it goes back to something we talked about earlier. Safety is not a function of the content or the topic. It’s a function of people’s belief about your intent.

So when I see someone, and to your point, in the middle of a conversation getting defensive, I have to ask myself the question, “Okay, whoa! What are they believing about my intent that’s making them get defensive here?”

It’s one of two things. Either they believe that I don’t have mutual purpose, which is what I want, is a threat to what they want, that I don’t share their goals, their struggles, that I don’t care about what they care about. Or it’s a lack of mutual respect. I don’t respect them or care about them as a person. And if there is a lack of mutual purpose and or mutual respect, safety is gone out of the room, right?

It gets sucked out of the room completely and people go into self-preservation mode. They want to protect themselves, right? Because they feel threatened. Their belief about your intent is, “Hey, she’s out to get me,” “He’s out to get me,” “He doesn’t care about me,” “He doesn’t respect me.”

And so your job in that moment is to put a little bookmark in the topic. Let’s say we’re talking about a gap around deadlines or sales quota or parking your car on my driveway, and take a quick sidestep to address the conditions in that moment, “Let me address your belief about my intent, because I have no hope of you hearing about the actual problem if you are stuck in self-preservation mode, if you’re feeling defensive and unsafe.”

So a great skill that I find helpful is called contrasting, is that if I’m noticing that my intent is good, but that you believe my intent isn’t, I simply contrast what I don’t intend with what I do intend. So if you and I are having a conversation about you parking on my driveway, and I say, “Hey, you know, you and I talked about this before about my grass and it’s important to me. And we talked about where we park our cars.”

“I noticed that over the last couple of weeks that your car has been parked on my grass and it’s left these marks that I now have to fix. I just wanted to find out what’s happened based on our initial conversation?” And you go, “I can’t believe you. You don’t care about the fact that I’ve got five kids in here. I’ve got two adult kids that are struggling, and we’re just trying to make ends meet.”

And it’s that moment you go, “Whoa!” right? They think that I don’t respect the fact that they got a busy life. And in that moment, they’re perceiving that my intent is that I don’t share their concerns. That’s actually not true.

Like, I got a lot of kids myself and I can respect that they’re trying to juggle a lot of balls all at once. Before I keep talking about the parking issue, I got to address the fact that they’re questioning my intent.

So I might say something like, “Oh, I apologize. My intent, I’m not trying to say that I don’t recognize that you’ve got a lot going on, and I know that feeling of having lots of kids and trying to make space for their cars, and you got kids running around and I totally get that and I can empathize with that. I’m not trying to question that that’s a lot to balance.”

“My concern is that you and I have talked before about this, and just like you, I’m trying to take care of my own house and my grass is important to me, and I just want to find a way to be sensitive to the fact that we’re both juggling a lot and keep my grass in good shape.”

So it’s just a simple way to say, “Here’s what I don’t intend. Here’s what I do intend. I’m going to address what I think is your misunderstanding, your belief about my intent. I’m going to go right at that. And then I’m going to clarify for you what my real intent is, right, smoothing out that psychological safety by helping you understand that.”

And like we said before, when people feel safe, they’re more likely, it’s not guaranteed, they’re more likely to embrace the truth that you’re trying to share. And when they embrace that truth, they’re more likely to take responsibility for their own behavior.

Pete Mockaitis
And I’m wondering about, even if they don’t think that, “This person is out to get me,” do you believe, or is there psychological research data on this, that a subset of people may simply have a high level of defensiveness, feeling threatened-ness, unable to receive criticism of any sort, no matter how delightfully and positively you’re intending it? Like, what do those percentages look like?

Justin Hale
I think that’s great. I think, absolutely, that is true. But I don’t know, our experience has not been that that is necessarily always consistent across every relationship and every part of someone’s life. So if we were to put it on a scale of zero, which is never defensive, to 10 of always defensive, that someone who’s a nine at work doesn’t mean they’re always a nine at home. They might be.

But I think that previous life experiences drive people who might be a three up to a five. I see this all the time with people I work with in organizations where they have a boss who’s pretty tyrannical and hard on them.

Maybe they were a three when they started that job in terms of their own mindset of other people’s intent and how often they get defensive, and their belief about other people’s intent being malicious. And by the time they leave that job, they’re at a five. They’re a little more leery of people’s intent, especially leaders. They’ve become more skeptical, more cynical, okay?

And so, yes, I do believe that our life experiences, and our experience has been working with hundreds of thousands of people doing this training and consulting and coaching with these conversations, is that you can have, especially when it goes on for long enough, you could have the kinds of experiences that prime you to have a little bit quicker of a negative belief about other people’s intent.

But here’s the good news. We’ve also found that that can be retrained. And someone who may be, because of life experiences, maybe because of an upbringing, and their family, or an environment they’ve worked in, that they’ve become an eight.

That doesn’t mean you’re an eight for the rest of your life, that you can learn and skillfully move yourself down to a three, back down to a two, that that mindset or that belief system about other people’s intent can be retrained, which is great news, right? It’s great news.

And so with any of these things around conversations, we have found that it’s not one of these things that you’re either born with or not, that it’s a skill that you can develop and you can become world-class at it if you weren’t born in a family that was great at talking about issues, or that your first job was an organization where candor was the norm, but that you can become highly skilled at that.

And that’s been our experience with people we’ve worked with, executives, leaders all over the world. Most of these people didn’t just automatically come from a background that they were good at it. They developed it. They practiced it. They were aware of their own deficiencies and lack of skill and their own poor behaviors up to that point.

And we worked on saying, “Here’s a replacement behavior. Here’s a better skill. We’re going to practice this. We’re going to have you try it out. Oh, it didn’t go super well. Why didn’t it go well? Let’s give you some coaching. Let’s have you try it again.” And through time, they become masters at holding these accountability discussions.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Well, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Justin Hale

I think two big things, kind of going back to the beginning, is I think we tend to obsess over the risks of speaking up, and we minimize the risks of not speaking up. And I would encourage people, if you’ve got a gap in front of you that you’ve been putting off, just do a little analysis for yourself.

Sure, make a list of all the risks of saying something, “Oh, it’s uncomfortable. It’s going to be a confrontation. They might get defensive.” But then I want you to take equal amount of time, writing down a list of things that could happen if you didn’t say something.

What if this continued over the next five years? What would that mean for you emotionally, for the organization, for the team, for the results, for this person? In that relationship, that personal relationship, let’s say, with your spouse, if you didn’t bring up this issue you have with them about the way they treat you, and you didn’t bring it up, what would happen over the next 10 years in your marriage? What would that mean for your relationship, for the feeling in your home?

So I would encourage people to really shift that risk analysis, and I guarantee they’ll start finding that honesty coming out more often. And the second thing I would say is that we talk about this in the book that all lasting happiness and satisfaction depends on our capacity for both truth and love.

Not just love. Not just care. Not just respect, but our capacity for happiness and fulfillment is about that truth, that honesty, the having that conversation, and about caring and loving people. We tend to believe we have to choose one or the other. You can either be honest with someone or you can tell them the truth.

And our ability to achieve the greatest level of happiness and fulfillment and development of people is about our tireless effort to accomplish both of those things. Be honest and be caring. Be truthful and be loving.

And that’s where you start to see relationships flourish in ways you can never imagine because they’re no longer shrouded with hiding and dishonesty and masking and silence. They’re now filled with a beautiful amount of candor.

And so those are two big things I would suggest for people to consider as they start to face these conversations.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Justin Hale
Well, we talked about David Allen earlier. That is one of my favorite quotes is the big David Allen, you know, quip where he said, “Your head is for having ideas, not for holding them.” I absolutely love that. It’s been one of those things that has transformed my life. And if you talk about being more productive, high-performing, get stuff out of your head and you’ll start to see it get done.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And could you share a favorite study, or experiment, or bit of research?

Justin Hale

Any research on social proof, I find to be super powerful. It turns out that we think that we’re individuals with our own minds, but we tend to do what other people do. One study I found really was fascinating where they were trying to get people in hotels to reuse towels to try to save water.

And so they put a variety of different signs next to the towels to try to do an experiment to see which sign increased the percentage of people reusing towels. And they would say things like, “Oh, if you reuse your towels, you’ll save this amount of water,” or, “If you reuse your towels, we’ll give you some points on your rewards program,” whatever.

The one that had the greatest impact was any sign that they put that said, “X percent of people do this,” “70% of people recycle their towels or reuse their towels.” The ones that were related to social proof, aka, “This is normal. Most people do this behavior,” was the one that had the greatest impact on whether people reuse their towels or not.

And there are dozens of studies like that where we, essentially, say, “We like to fit in,” and that’s a powerful thing to know about why we do what we do.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Justin Hale
A book that I picked up as an undergrad, walking through the university library, looking for something to spark what I wanted to major in, what I want to do with my life, a book called Why We Do What We Do by Edward Deci. It’s all about motivation, what drives us. Intrinsic motivation versus extrinsic. Loved it.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Justin Hale
Note to Self. So this goes back to the David Allen thing. I got a lot going on. I got stuff to quickly get stuff off my mind, but I don’t want to lose track of where it goes. And for a while, I used to email myself. I used to open up my email app and put myself as the who I’m sending it to, and have to put a subject line in, and then put in whatever message I wanted to, had on my mind.

Note to Self just cuts through all of that. It, essentially, is just, you open up the app and it’s just blank digital space. And all you do is type something and just push send. It automatically emails you. It’s true with images. I take a picture of something and then automatically just, Note to Self, boom, send it to myself.

So, in five seconds, I can go from thought to, it’s in an inbox somewhere that I trust and I can let it go. And so I love that that app, increases my efficiency, so.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Justin Hale
Making my bed. I love that. Love just making it nice, making it look good. I feel like, for the rest of morning, as I walk through my room and I see that done, it sends a message to my brain about, you know, accomplishment, performance, who I am, who I want to be.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, you hear them quote back to you often?

Justin Hale
There was a leader that shared this with me, and she said, “The road to success is paved with mistakes well-handled.” And that really connects to why we wrote the book Crucial Accountability and why the revision, was that our success has a lot to do with not moments when things are going well.

It has to do when things go wrong, when people make mistakes, if I’m a leader or a parent or a friend, what determines the success of this relationship is often how we handle mistakes, how we handle moments when things don’t go as planned.

And so I’ve shared that with thousands of people I’ve spoken to or worked with, and I hear that back a lot that people find that to be especially powerful, “The road to success is paved with mistakes well-handled.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Justin Hale
Yeah, CrucialLearning.com is a great place to go to learn about not just our books, but our training program, consulting and coaching. And people can find me on LinkedIn, Justin Hale.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Justin Hale
Well, during this podcast, people inevitably had a thought, “That’s really cool.” And my challenge for people would be to say, “Okay, but what’s your next action?” Don’t let that cool thing reside in your hope and as hope in your brain. What are you going to do about it? Pick a small little action, go take that action.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Justin, thank you.

Justin Hale
You’re welcome! Thanks for having me.

1127: How to Look and Sound Confident Even When You’re Not with Montana von Fliss

By Podcasts No Comments

Montana von Fliss shares her expert strategies for appearing more confident, no matter what you’re communicating.

You’ll Learn

  1. How to override your critical self-talk
  2. The #1 habit most communicators neglect
  3. Three simple tips to upgrade your presence

About Montana 

Montana von Fliss is a keynote speaker, public speaking coach, and CEO of Montana & Co., where she and her team help people deliver the best presentations of their careers. Her TEDx talk How to Be Confident (Even If You’re Not) has 3M+ views. With 17 years coaching at companies like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google, and 30+ years as an actor/director, Montana teaches speakers to show up with clarity, presence, and real confidence.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Monarch.com. Get 50% off your first year on with the code AWESOME.

Pete Mockaitis
Montana, welcome!

Montana Von Fliss

Hello. Pete, hi! Thank you so much for having me!

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, thank you. It’s great to have you here. I’m excited to talk about confidence. Tell us, you’ve done a lot of coaching with a lot of people. Is there a top thing about confidence that has really surprised you and your clients again and again?

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, that confidence is not an innate trait. You don’t have to be born confident. It can be learned. It is a skill that you can practice and learn.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. That is encouraging. I guess that’s what we’re trying to do here. Otherwise, it’d be a very short interview, Montana.

Montana Von Fliss
I think so.

Pete Mockaitis

It’s learnable. Cool. All right. Well, so I’d love to hear perhaps an inspiring story of just that, someone who was not so confident, learned the things to do, did those things, and walked out much more confident.

Montana Von Fliss
I think I’m a great example of that. I certainly wanted to be on stage. From a very young age, I wanted to be an actor, and that was the path that I went down. But I also almost always felt nervous stepping on a stage, sometimes downright terrified, really. And yet I just kept doing it because I loved everything about it.

So, I just kept doing it, sort of stubbornly just kept doing it. And I am the poster child for, if you just keep going, keep practicing, keep giving it a go, keep going up for that next time at bat, you will improve in many ways, really, but certainly, I think, in terms of confidence.

And I can tell you a very specific story about how I sort of figured out a little hack to how I could reliably give myself the confidence I needed to get on big stages.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, so you’re feeling nervous. What happened next?

Montana Von Fliss
Well, at first, I just white-knuckled it like, “Uh, I don’t like this feeling. We’re on the roller coaster, but I guess the show’s about to start. So here we go.” And I just sort of would get through it, I guess. I didn’t have a plan. I just thought, “This is terrible.” And then, life would move on, and I would try to push it down, stop it from happening.

But over time, I just kept sort of banging my head against that wall, so to speak. And I came to this realization, like, “Well, that’s not working. So what else could I try?”

And I realized that I was memorizing my lines, I was working very hard on what I was saying out loud. So when I was an actor, those were memorized verbatim scripts, right? If I was a presenter or a speaker in a professional context, then I was writing those words myself and I was spending time crafting that narrative. But I wasn’t spending any time writing, crafting, exploring, playing with the narrative I had in my head, right?

And the moment I decided to apply what I do for my out-loud text to that inner text, everything changed. I was like, “Wow, you can do this? You can go in there and sort of tinker with how you talk to yourself?” And that began this really great ever-evolving, it’s still evolving for me, grand experiment in how you talk to yourself and how you can change that up and how much it really matters in terms of the result in your performance.

Pete Mockaitis
Intriguing. So, thinking about the lines that you’re saying to yourself and then proactively reshaping them so you’re not just the actor, but the playwright. Nifty. Could we hear some examples of some common inner texts or lines that you said to yourself frequently and what you decided to substitute in, in the edit?

Montana Von Fliss
Absolutely. So, a common one for me was, and still sometimes is, something like, “You better be perfect. Don’t mess up. What if they find out that you’re not very good at this, that you’re not the person to listen to on this topic?” Definitely a lot of thoughts like that. “Don’t mess up,” a lot of things like that. And sometimes even kind of ugly or darker ones, like, “What if they don’t like you?” which is interesting.

But, anyway, I’m sure people can relate to whatever your own little unhelpful thoughts that come in. So, those would come in. And again, normally, I think I would just sort of be in the grip of these thoughts, like they would sort of take over and then, at some point, I would just walk out onto the stage with these thoughts running.

Now, still a win, I walked out onto the stage. But once I started making my own silent script for the moments before I stepped on the stage, then I would have an answer available to those sentences. So, for example, when I would hear something like, “You better be perfect,” the moment I became aware that I was getting that old message again, I would say, “Oh, I hear you. Thank you. Thank you for trying to protect me.” That’s a new one. I’m slipping in there, “Thank you.”

You know, it’s like my anxiety or whatever, trying to protect me, “Thank you. That is not my measure of success for this presentation. My measure of success is have I helped at least one person in this room?” Now that came out of me setting the silent sentence, the intention, that what I want to do with this presentation is help at least one person here today, right?

So, that was me sort of sitting down and, like, rewriting that silent narrative in my head and having that little silent script ready so that, when that ugly unhelpful thought came in, I actually had something there, memorized, practiced in the script.

Now, sometimes it turns into a little dialogue where it will go, like, “But, but, but have you thought of this? What about this other fear? Excuse me, what about tripping? Have you thought about tripping? Have you thought about what if the tech doesn’t work?”

At first, that kind of bummed me out, that like, “Ah, my little trick didn’t just make anxiety, you know, poof and disappear.” But then I realized, after watching Inside Out 2, seriously, I realized, “Well, what if all the emotions, including anxiety and fear, are on my side? They’re there to help me. So it’s just doing its job, right?”

So it says, “Be afraid of this thing.” And I go, “Thank you. Thank you so much for trying to protect me,” which, by the way, that immediately starts to change the relationship, “I’m doing this.” And then I say, I sort of take back my power by saying, “Here’s what I’m going to do. I am going for the goal of helping at least one person here.”

It usually doesn’t go, “Oh, okay, cool. You got this.” It usually goes, “But, but, but how about this?” And I go, “Thank you. I hear you. And I’m going to keep walking to that stage because I really want to help that person who’s out there waiting for me, right?”

So I, generally, have to insist gently, kindly, with gratitude, insist that I’m going to do the thing that I set out to do. And that, I have to be honest, I’m still shaking, like the adrenaline burst has already happened. The fear chemicals have been released. So I’m still shaking. I’m still sweating.

I’m still having those thoughts of like, “Well, why don’t we just run away instead? Wouldn’t that be better if we just didn’t do this?” And I just have to gently, almost like a parent talking to a child, like, “I hear you that you want to do that and we’re going to do this other thing instead. You are going to wear your jacket as we go out into the snow, yeah?”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, I like that a lot, the assertive, decisive, clear word to yourself. And I think that, just at the gym this morning, I was sort of annoyed by some things that are on the TV. I don’t even remember what it was. It was like an advertisement or a program that I just thought it was a waste of time, unnecessary, distracting, and irritating. I’d rather just not have all those screens going, you know?

So there was something going on. And I could go down a loop of, “Oh, why is this like this? I don’t like that. That’s so annoying. Why don’t people…?” you know, whatever. Just a whole whiny interrogation that doesn’t really lead to insights.

And I just found myself saying internally, “I refuse to spend a second attending to that.” And I did. And it was like, “I’m just going to look not at those screens, but elsewhere,” and it was a much more enjoyable experience. So I love that, that it’s decisive, it’s assertive, and you call the shots, you have the authority, and you take it and you deploy it with a definitive statement.

Montana Von Fliss

That’s a great example. And that, to me, was revolutionary. You know, realizing that, at any moment, I have the power to make a different choice and, especially, I have all the choice in the world about how I talk to myself. And how you talk to yourself really matters, and we do it all day long, right? Pick up glass. Take sip of water. We’re really good at following our own instructions.

But the trick is sort of noticing that and then going, “Oh, how would I like to maybe tinker with that?” especially if it’s not working very well for us, right? And I think that is not necessarily a new idea, the fact that we can edit our self-talk, we can practice positive and constructive self-talk.

But the idea that I’m adding to it is, “Why not put it in the script?” Like, it’s the silent part of the script before you begin speaking, or perhaps it’s in the pauses in between, or really anytime you need it, but put it in the script and practice it as much as you’re practicing the out loud bit.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I like that a lot.

Montana Von Fliss
So it becomes part of the script. It becomes default. It becomes part of you, just as easily as you can rattle off, I don’t know, the three points that you’re deciding to speak for this communication. You’re also just as able to access that silent instruction that is more constructive and is setting you up for where you want to go.

Pete Mockaitis
Let’s hear about practicing it, what does that look like in practice, the practicing of the internal dialogue?

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, so, I mean it when I say it’s the silent part of the script. So, actually, write it down in your script or however you keep your notes. I put it in parentheses myself, just as a signal to myself that it’s an internal thought. It’s an inside voice rather than something I intend to say.

And so, whatever kind of notes you use, that can be, you know, the little speaker notes in PowerPoint or that could be, like, sometimes I’ll write it down on a sticky note and tape it to my monitor if it’s a virtual presentation. But, certainly, it is part of the script such that every time you run it, every time you practice it, you will start with a silent sentence, and then go to the out loud part.

So, an example of that, you know, mine, I have several. Now, the one that I mentioned in my TED Talk is, “I invite you to be here with me while I am here with you so that I can help you to the best of my ability.” Now, that’s long, but I’ve said it so many times that it’s just right there for me. Sometimes I will collapse it and just say, “Invite and help.” And it does the job for me because I have it so ingrained and such a habit, and it brings all the goodness.

Lately, I’ve been loving the silent sentence, “Let’s grow. Let’s grow.” So short, but it’s got the “Let’s,” which got the invitation part built in, which I love. And then “Let’s grow,” right, it reminds me that we’re both learning. I may be giving the presentation, but I’m learning, too, as we’re doing this and we’re partners in this, yeah?

So, the way that that might look, I’ll have, “Let’s grow” at the top of my script. So, inside my head while I’m doing a rehearsal or practice run, right, it’ll be something like, and this is the silent part, I would say, “All right, I invite you to be here with me while I’m here with you so that we can grow and learn together.” Or, perhaps it’s, “Let’s grow. Hi, my name is Montana Von Fliss. Prepare to be amazed,” or whatever my intro is, right, that I say out loud.

So, it would, literally, if someone were watching me, it would look like me looking around at my imagined audience. Then they would hear me say, “Hi, my name is Montana Von Fliss,” etc. Yeah, so it might not look like much, but what you’re doing there is you’re saying that silent bit in your head, the silent part of the script, you say your out loud part. And then when you go back to start again, you start with that silent sentence.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, that’s really cool, in terms of thinking about integrating the silent sentence in any place you are doing a meeting, a speech, a presentation, or just, like, a one-on-one conversation with someone that you’ve done some prep for because it’s part of it and it’s to yourself and then it shapes what follows. And I just think that’s a cool thing where you might integrate in all kinds of conversations. And I think that’s really nifty.

Montana Von Fliss
Absolutely. Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
I guess I was curious to hear with practicing internally, if what I imagined was when you said you’re in your internal script, you might go with, “Oh, what if I mess up? You better be perfect.” And then you have your response that you’ve practiced internally, which is, “Well, hey, I succeed if I’ve transformed just one person,” or that kind of a response.

What’s funny for me is, I think, because I’ve been there, and then I’ve had the worry. I’ve had the response about one person. And then I’ve got the counter response like, “Well, Pete, if there’s 300 people in this audience, and you’ve only transformed one people, then 299 people have wasted their time. And that’s really a failure for what you have done to all of these people.”

So, not to diminish that very powerful, hopeful, useful thought, but when the brain is in scared, anxious zone, or just snippy, grumpy, and goes there, do you practice the counter counter-response, or do you just redirect like, “Well, we’re doing this now”? Or, how does that work internally and how do you practice that?

Montana Von Fliss
I always have a counter response, but it usually stems from what my base thought or my initial silent sentence was. So, for example, if my silent sentence is, “I’m here to help at least one person in this room,” and then the counter thought is, “Yeah, but it’s a failure if you don’t help the other 299.”

I’d say, “And I said, I want to help at least one person. Everyone is invited to this information and these new ideas. But my personal goal is that I want to reach that one person who gets me, who needs to hear what I have and really plugs into my way of looking at it.”

So, do you hear that counter response is really just an emphasis of my original thought?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I hear you and I just wonder about, and maybe I’ve just got a nasty mind.

Montana Von Fliss
No, keep going. I love this. Keep going.

Pete Mockaitis
But I can counter, counter, counter the response is like, “Well, your goal is lame and you should raise your standards.”

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, you can totally, oh, man, have I had all of those thoughts, “Your goal is lame.” Yes, you might, “Thank you for protecting me. Thank you for helping me to think of that.” And I would say, “I’m making a doable goal. And if I get more, then I have a higher likelihood of success.” And that helps me, right, to go, “Oh, I can get at least one person.”

The other thing it helps me to do, and I might remind myself of this if I’m having this little internal talk, is it always helps me to think of, regardless of how many people are in the room, it helps me to think of the power of one-on-one communication. Like, I do better in one-on-one communication. So I’m going to borrow that superpower of mine, and I’m going to activate it by thinking of this as a one-on-one, even though everyone in the room is invited, right?

So that is part of what I’m doing, is getting the best out of me by thinking of it this way. So we’re going to keep going with the idea of, “I’m going to help at least one person,” so I can activate that one-on-one communication style. And I also know, like it might go, “But, but, but, but,” I also know that I can’t control other people. I can only invite them. So all 300 are certainly invited to the information.

But I know that I’m very achievement-oriented. So if I make it a doable achievement, meaning, like, this is a goal that I am more likely to attain then I do better. That’s another part of just knowing myself and knowing what motivates me, right? So I might say, “I’m just making an attainable goal for myself. All 300 are certainly invited.” Does that make sense? Does that help?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes, thank you.

Montana Von Fliss
Like, I mean, and I go on, like I have conversations with myself, or, I don’t know, my other selves. They could be my other selves, maybe my younger self. It could be my anxiety or fear, but I have full-on dialogues. So, don’t be surprised because it makes sense that it wants to continue to bargain with you in this way.

Like, because imagine you’re walking into a burning building, right, and you’re like, “Oh, I’m going to go save my Macbook in that burning building,” and your fear is going, “Don’t go into a burning building. Don’t do that. You could die. Don’t do that.”

Imagine if you just went, “Hey, it’s cool. I got this.” It wouldn’t stand down. It wouldn’t say, “Oh, okay.” It would keep trying to stop you because that’s its job is to keep you safe. And going up to speak in front of many people, and it activates a similar sort of fight or flight fear mechanism in us, right?

So it’s not unusual for it to keep fighting, to keep you safe, keep you from going on that stage. It’s just, “Do you have a prepared sentence and sort of the surrounding logic that you wholeheartedly believe in to respond to it in that moment?”

And I have found that it works best when they are tied to what you care deeply about, like, “Why are you doing this?” And even sometimes, “Why are you here on this planet? What is your purpose on this earth?” Like, I feel genuinely, I am here, in part, anyway, to help others be able to step on a stage, and to feel a little bit of ease, maybe even just find a process and a way to manage through it so that they can do it more effectively, right?

So when I attached to that in my own personal example of, like, “I’m just here to help one person,” that’s activating something extremely powerful in me. I will walk through hot coals, Pete, to help you for your next presentation. Like, that’s just how I’m built.

So, when I remind myself of that in that moment of extremis, in that moment when I’m sort of hijacked by fight, flight, you know, that fear, it acts like this override switch and I will do it kind of no matter what, is how it feels. And so, when you dig around for that for yourself, you’ll sort of know it when you feel it. Like, “Why did I say yes to this presentation? Well, my boss told me so.”

But then dig further, “Well, I like keeping my job. I like feeding my family. Well, maybe that’s it. Maybe the image of my little daughter is the thing that pulls me onto that stage or up in front of that group of people.”

Maybe you’re like me and you really love helping people, you love sharing information. Maybe it’s like problem solving. I love sharing a solution to a problem that you might have. Like, that just lights me up. Like, problem solving and puzzle solving, yeah?

When you find out what that is, that has energy, huge energy. And when you get that, like, you grab it, you write the silence sentence down, you practice it, when that voice that wants to argue with you comes in, I promise you, if you’re attached to that deeper why, you will have all the right answers to, essentially, redirect yourself to what your priority actually is in this moment.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, so we’ve covered the internal dialogue. Excellent. How about practicing the actual external speech?

Montana Von Fliss
So practice is probably my best piece of advice as a speaker coach. It’s also probably my most ignored piece of advice. And I understand. I don’t feel like practicing pretty much ever, but I just learned as an actor, that was my first profession. I learned through that job that practice is everything. Practice is how you get ready for any type of performance, speech.

And, by the way, we already know this. We apply it easily to something like if you want to learn a musical instrument or if you want to learn a sport, right? We never go, “Okay, everybody, we have a big soccer game on Saturday. So let’s all go home and just think about how we’re all going to do well on that day, right? And then see you on Saturday,” right?

No, we would practice it as much as possible. We’d practice specific plays and all sorts of things. And yet, when it comes to public speaking, presentations, for some reason, we don’t automatically apply that. And I’m not exactly sure why, but that is another thing I’m here to tell the world. Truly, the best thing you can do is practice.

So, what that looks like is actually standing up, saying it out loud, running through your script, however you have your notes, have those up, run through your slides if you have them, imagine the audience, invite them in, make it all be like it will be on the day. If you’re going to be seated, if it’s something like a virtual presentation, open up whatever virtual platform you’re going to be on and be seated how you’re going to be seated.

Test your tech, but also run through your presentation out loud as if the audience is there. And that’s what it looks like. Really actually doing it. It’s like if you were going to learn the piano, you would actually play that piano. You would play it, right, to get better at it, to prepare for that concert on Friday.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. And so, that’s the practicing of the external speech. And just a side note, I remember we had Diane DiResta some time ago on the show, and I said, “How much should we practice?” And she gave a very definitive answer, “Six sticks. Do the whole run through six times.” It’s like, “All right, that’s very precise.” What’s your hot take on how much practice is the right amount?

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, it’s different for everyone, but I’ll tell you what I do. If there’s a presentation coming up for me in about a week, I will start practicing once a day.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s about six, seven. Yeah, that’s about six or seven times. There you go.

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, so I definitely agree with that advice. So a week or two before, put it in your calendar. Practice a little bit every day. I would do, personally, I would do a full run through every day. I would also take the intro, like whatever that is for you, could be like the first 30 seconds or so, and your final sentence. So those two bookends. And I would run those three times in a row out loud, multiple times a day from wherever.

So, like, if you’re in the shower or cooking dinner or exercising. Because if those are strong and ready and available to you and they’re really boiled down and just exactly what you wish to say to tee up the entire communication, as well as to close it out strongly and stick that landing, oh, my goodness, that is so effective. So effective. So that’s how I would practice.

And then you have to figure out how to make yourself do this. And that goes to digging into, like, what motivates you. And you can go back to that great recent episode you had with Chris Bailey. I loved that one about figuring out how you particularly are motivated through your own principles and your own levers.

And so, what is that for you? And then build that in. So maybe I don’t get a second cup of coffee until I do my run through. Maybe I go, “Oh, I’ll just do five minutes.” And then, of course, I end up doing 15. Whatever that is for you to get you to just do it.

Pete Mockaitis
In a way, that’s the mini game or challenge in and of itself. It’s like, “What needs to happen for me to do it? Okay. All right. Well, let’s just do that real quick. All right, now we’re set.” As opposed to just getting in a loop of, “Oh, I don’t want to. That sounds hard. It’s uncomfortable. It’s boring. There’s a really great show I want to watch.”

You know, it’s sort of picking a new question, a new game, it’s like, “All right. Well, what’s it going to take to do this shortly? Coffee might be the answer. It could be something else.”

Montana Von Fliss
Yeah, what is your driver? And, really, you are the only one who knows that. I know some people also feel kind of funny either seated or standing up in their office or wherever, by themselves running through it. Like, that can feel silly or strange to them, especially if they don’t have a lot of performance experience.

And I get that, right? But you just have to kind of get over it. Just do it a couple of times and get over it. Because, again, doing the thing is how you will get better at the thing.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly.

Montana Von Fliss
So that means doing it on your own. I will say, like, whatever kind of little ladder you need, like what is the smallest step you can take, and then slowly work up that ladder. So, for example, maybe you just do your intro and you’re all really like, “What do I want to say? It’s kind of…No, maybe I should sit and write it out and just think about it a whole bunch.”

I would recommend instead, just say it. Say it imperfectly out loud. Say it to the cereal boxes. They are rather – what – non-judgmental. And then after you’ve done that a couple of times, move to some art on the wall. Go to a lovely piece of art. A little more judgment there. Say it again. Then move to a beating heart, right? Do you have a pet? Say it to them. Start with the cat, then move to the dog, right?

Or, the other way around, maybe start with the dog with a little more love and acceptance, then move to the cat, then move to a human, a human being who loves and trusts you would be a good choice, I would say, right? And then maybe a dry run with your colleagues and then the wider audience.

Somewhere in there, by the way, too, you have a video camera in your pocket. Video yourself, watch it back. And I know everybody at that moment goes, “Ugh, that’s the only one, Montana, that I am not willing to do.” And I hear you and I want to tell you, every human, I believe every human feels that. Pretty much everyone feels that, “Ugh, I don’t want to watch myself, whatever that is,” that kind of discomfort.

It might feel a little funny, but wouldn’t you rather see it in advance and be able to have the opportunity to make an adjustment before you share it with a wider audience?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, a lot of good stuff there. Excellent. Thank you. Well, you also mentioned in your TEDx Talk, we’ve got five techniques to appear confident even if we’re not feeling it. We talked about the silent sentence and some purposeful practice. Can you give us a quick pro tip on energy levels, strategic pauses, and confident body language?

Montana Von Fliss

Yeah, well, they’re two sides to the same coin, right, if you want to look confident, sound confident, be confident on a stage. One side that we’ve spent most of our time on so far is about sort of building that confidence. You can’t always have or make yourself have a feeling, but you can invite it, right? And that’s what the silent sentence is about.

The other side of that coin of confidence is how to look and sound confident regardless of how you’re feeling, regardless of how much sleep you got the night before. And that really comes through the physical and vocal choices that you make on a stage, whether it’s virtual or in person, because we read a lot about each other based on our body language, facial expression, vocal dynamics, all of that kind of stuff, right?

So, the cool thing is that knowing that, that we read so much about that and that we can’t yet read each other’s minds, so we won’t ever know if you are actually nervous as a speaker, unless you show us or tell us. So you can use these three tips to look confident, regardless. And that is number one, turn up the energy and speak up. Number two, pause like a boss.

Number three is walk in there like a superhero. Stand in superhero. Sit like a superhero. How would a superhero sit, you know? And so, that first one is volume. Speak up. It’s hard for a lot of people to do that, truly, especially if they have maybe some cultural, different cultural background, or sometimes some stuff from childhood with parents who thought you should be seen and not heard. There’s a lot in there.

But I will tell you this idea. First of all, if it’s on a scale of one to 10, just shoot for a five. Just one notch up. That’s all you got to go for. You don’t have to shout. In fact, you know, unless you’re on some keynote stadium, you really don’t. Please don’t shout. But just turn it up one notch maybe or shoot for that five.

And the other thought there I find helpful is it really makes your audience feel more comfortable. So, for example, if I walk out and I’m like, “Hey, Pete, my name is Montana, and I’m going to give you this awesome tip about how to be better at your job,” you’d be like, “Okay, no thanks,” right? And that’s just for the most part volume.

If I move from, that was down here, maybe like out of three, and you move it right up here to a five, suddenly, it sounds prepared, confident, like I want to be here. And that doesn’t mean I actually feel that on the inside. You might be feeling hungry or tired or nervous, but if you raise the volume just a bit, they will never know. They will never know. How cool is that?

Pausing. The second one is it takes some practice, but it’s a totally learnable skill, and it sounds so confident. Just think about any great leader, any great speaker. They can pause like a boss. And it is the antidote to verbal filler. If you video yourself and watch it back, if you actually do that tip and you, “Uh-oh, I’m doing all kinds of ums.” A few ums, who cares? But if you’re doing ums every time there’s a pause or between every sentence, just pause instead, take a breath instead. So powerful.

And the third one is body language. And, I mean, that encapsulates a lot, like how to master confident body language. But that’s why I say just walk in there like a superhero, because it sort of does it all, right? It’s better eye contact. It’s a more commanding posture rather than like a closed body language, making yourself smaller or crossing your arms in front of you. It’s more open body language.

And it’s also a vibe. It’s a vibe of, like, “Yes, I got you. I got you.” And all of these, again, might feel a little funny or uncomfortable if they’re new to you. But if you really focus in on what will make the audience feel more comfortable, then you find you might be able to do these. You might have more incentive to do these, I should say.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, now let’s hear about some of your favorite things. Can we hear a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Montana Von Fliss
I have one from the Dalai Lama here. And it says, “If a situation is such that you can do something about it, then there is no need to worry. If it’s not fixable, then there’s no help in worrying. In fact, there is no benefit in worrying whatsoever.” Thank you, Dalai Lama.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, and a favorite book?

Montana Von Fliss
A recent book that I absolutely loved. Let’s see, my certainly my favorite book from last year was James by Percival Everett. It is a reimagining of the story of Huckleberry Finn from James’ perspective. Brilliant.

But I also love, this one is a little bit more in line with what we’re talking about, my personal Bible is called Art & Fear, and that’s by David Bayles and Ted Orland. And it’s all about how to deal with perfectionism and not let that stop you and how to just practice even when you’re not feeling like it. It’s wonderful. Check it out.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And is there a key nugget you share that seems to really resonate with people, you hear them quote it back to you often?

Montana Von Fliss
Oh, yeah, “Pause like a boss.” T-shirts have been made.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Beautiful.

Montana Von Fliss
People love that one. But also I get, “Confident Captain” quite a bit, “Montana, I’m going to be the Confident Captain.” And I’m like, “Yes, do it.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Montana Von Fliss

They can come to my website, MontanaVonFliss.com, sign up for the newsletter, and get just monthly tips and offers for free coaching from me. Also, all the socials if you like to consume great tidbits that way. And I have just started a YouTube channel. So if you like watching helpful videos that are also fun and entertaining, come find me there.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Montana, this has been fun. Thank you.

Montana Von Fliss
Thank you so much, Pete. This is really great.