Tag

KF #10. Courage Archives - How to be Awesome at Your Job

1100: How to Be Bold in the Face of Uncertainty (According to Science) with Dr. Ranjay Gulati

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Dr. Ranjay Gulati discusses how to resource yourself for courageous action during times of uncertainty.

You’ll Learn

  1. The critical question to ask when you’re feeling fear
  2. The six resources of courageous people
  3. The simple mental shift that leads to braver actions

About Ranjay

Ranjay Gulati is the Paul R. Lawrence MBA Class of 1942 Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. His pioneering work focuses on unlocking organizational and individual potential—embracing courage, nurturing purpose-driven leaders, driving growth, and transforming businesses. He is the recipient of the 2024 CK Prahalad Award for Scholarly Impact on Practice and was ranked as one of the top ten most cited scholars in Economics and Business over a decade by ISI-Incite. 

The Economist, Financial Times, and the Economist Intelligence Unit have listed him as among the top handful of business school scholars whose work is most relevant to management practice. He is a Thinkers50 top management scholar, speaks regularly to executive audiences, and serves on the board of several entrepreneurial ventures. 

He holds a PhD from Harvard University and a Master’s degree from MIT. He is the author of Deep Purpose (2022) and How to be Bold (2025), both published by Harper Collins. He lives in Newton, Massachusetts with his wife and two children.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Ranjay Gulati Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Ranjay, welcome!

Ranjay Gulati
Thank you. A pleasure to be here with you.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to talk about boldness and everyday courage and all the ways we can make that happen.

Ranjay Gulati
Yeah, I’m excited to talk to you today. And I think, you know, this has been a topic I’ve been studying for the last four years, so seeing it come to fruition is a relief and a delight both at the same time.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, just before we pushed record, you started saying great stuff about why right now, right now is when it’s really important to tap into some extra courage and why. So why don’t we pick it up right there? Why now?

Ranjay Gulati
Well, the one thing I don’t need to tell you, you already know this, is that we are right now in what Harvard Business Review calls an uncertainty crisis. We have technological uncertainty, “Where is AI going and how is that going to affect my job?” We have regulatory uncertainty, “Where are tariffs going? How is that going to affect my job?” We have geopolitical uncertainty, “How is that going to affect me and my job?” We have political uncertainty. We have environmental uncertainty. We have health uncertainty. And now there’s uncertainty everywhere.

Now remember, uncertainty is not the same as risk. Uncertainty is where you don’t know the outcomes. Risk is where you, kind of, more or less can model the outcomes, you put some pros and cons, you put some probability on them. And the last piece of the puzzle to understand is when there’s uncertainty, uncertainty activates in the human brain. It really goes right to the primitive brain, the survivalistic kind of reptilian brain, and activates the primal human emotion of fear.

And fear hijacks the amygdala, so you can’t even think straight. And you go into what people usually call fight or flight, but rarely do we fight. It goes to flight or freeze mode. And so, it’s normal to recognize and acknowledge that it’s scary, “I’m scared, but what am I going to do about it?” And that’s where courage comes into the picture.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, certainly, an uncertainty crisis. That sounds like one of the most anxious crises you can have. It’s a crisis about uncertainty itself. And I like that distinction there in terms of risk, right? It’s like, “Huh, maybe I’ll try this thing, and it’s either going to work or it’s not. All right.” That’s risk. Whereas, uncertainty is like, “We have no idea what could unfold in terms of, like, what the options may well be.”

And, yeah, it’s sort of funny, in a way. It’s almost sort of like the air we breathe or the water we swim in. It’s, like, you say that, and it’s like, “Well, yeah.” But it’s like, “Oh, wait a second. It wasn’t always like this.” It wasn’t always like this, but, yes, now that is our everyday reality. We are besieged by uncertainty on numerous dimensions, almost always.

Ranjay Gulati
Yeah. And I think, honestly, I think the question is, “How do we then deal with uncertainty? And how do we deal with the fear?” And I want to go back, when you talk about courage, is to go back to the Wizard of Oz. And if you remember the character, the Lion in the Wizard of Oz, and what does the Lion want? He wants courage.

And, ultimately, when he reaches the Wizard after this tortuous journey, and he tells the Wizard, “I want courage,” and the Wizard says, “But you already have courage because you got here, you took actions in spite of your fear.” And so, I think it’s the first starting point to understand this journey that I’m talking about, is courage is taking action in the face of fear. It’s not the absence of fear.

Very few people in this world are fearless. Most of us experience fear when we encounter uncertainty. And the question is, “How do we build tolerance for that fear? How do we learn to outwit fear? How do we learn to tame fear? How do we learn to face fear? How do we learn to normalize fear instead of succumbing to fear?” That gets to the heart of the issue, is that, “What is my response to normal fear that I’m going to experience in these trying times?”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Ranjay, that sounds nice, to have that set of skills, in terms of just our experience of living life and our emotional internal state of mind. I’d also love it if you could make the case for us. Perhaps you have a story of someone who mastered some of these skills and saw some cool results in their career. Or, what’s really at stake for us, whether we continue bumbling along as we are, versus really mastering some of, well, the nine Cs we’re going to get into of being courageous?

Ranjay Gulati
So, courage can manifest either in an instant. There’s a moment that comes up and suddenly you have to step up or not. Or, it can be very deliberate, well thought-out, and how you kind of operate and think through that. Let me give you examples of both. One is an instant one who is Brandon Tsay. So, Brandon Tsay is a young gentleman in his mid-20s, mild-mannered, slightly built, very pacifist gentleman.

In fact, he told me that he’d never really ever gotten to any fist fights or anything like that. He always ran away from a fight. And he’s a cashier at a dance hall in Southern California, a dance hall started by his grandmother. And he’s working behind the cubicle where there’s a cashier desk. And just a typical ordinary evening, the gentleman walks in with a gun.

And Brandon knows right away this is not good. Now the question is, “What is he going to do?” So, one side of him is saying, “Let me duck under the table. Maybe he won’t see me, and this, too, shall pass. I will be there to live fight another day.”

But something gets into him, and he comes out of the cashier’s area, through the door outside, into the lobby, and gets into a fight with this guy who starts punching him. In the process of punching Brandon, who’s taking the punches, he manages to pull the guy’s gun away and gets him out of there. He has no idea why he did it.

Now I had to really probe with him to understand why he did it, but it was in the moment. Now let me juxtapose this against another character whom I interviewed who was a former student of mine – Frances Haugen. Frances is Harvard MBA, you know, hard-charging, doing a great job, having a phenomenal tech career and is now at Facebook.

And she is very troubled by the content on Facebook and what it’s doing to people. And she doesn’t do much about it, she’s just thinking about it and is troubled by it. Then she sees one of her own close friends getting radicalized by Facebook content.

She also sees internal research showing that Facebook knows what their content is doing. So, she has to do, “What am I going to do?” She spends almost a year deliberating on what she’s going to do. Ultimately, she decides she’s going to be a whistleblower, even though it may end her career, which it did. But she felt she had to do something.

So, these are two very different characters, but if you try to understand, and none of them, neither one of them had really shown, they were not like these heroic people who were former Navy SEAL, you know, had been out there, they were always kind of on the front of things, but something activated in them, the capacity to take bold action in the face of uncertainty.

And that’s what I try to understand. How did they resource themselves? How did they find the self-courage to do something they, otherwise, would not have done in the face of uncertainty?

Pete Mockaitis
Well, it’s funny you said Frances Haugen. I was like, “Wait, I know that name. That’s in the news. Oh, yeah, that Frances Haugen, the famous whistleblower.” So, she was a student of yours.

Ranjay Gulati
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, you knew her, pre-whistleblowing times.

Ranjay Gulati
A long time ago, yes. Not very well. She was one among many of my students. But I wouldn’t have flagged her.

Pete Mockaitis
But she wasn’t like a fiery. Yeah, nothing?

Ranjay Gulati
No, I would not have flagged her and said, “Oh, she’s, one day, going to go and whistle-blow.” You know, I think that was my learning. In many instances, these are ordinary people who somehow find in themselves the capacity to be courageous.

Mahatma Gandhi was an ordinary Indian gentleman who wanted to be an English lawyer. He wanted to live in England. Nelson Mandela was not about to be a leader.

So, you have all these people who somehow, and that was what my learning was, “How do they resource? What triggers them? And how do they resource themselves to become courageous?” Because I believe courage is a choice. It’s a choice we all can make and it can really unlock our human potential in the workplace.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. Well, yes, I’d love to dig into exactly this. When you say “What triggers them?” it’s interesting, you have an equation, which I find intriguing, that fear equals uncertainty, plus loss of control. And I was chewing on this for a while before we got on because, I suppose, if we have something real bad is going to happen to us, but we’re certain of it, the feeling isn’t so much fear.

Like, let’s say, “I’m going to get fired. I know it. Layoffs are happening. I am right in the crosshairs. I’ve got a meeting scheduled with HR, and they never schedule meetings with me. Many other people have been fired. So, it’s pretty much a certainty. I’m going to be fired.” Because there’s no more uncertainty, it doesn’t really feel like fear, so much as I guess dread, disappointment, sadness, resignation.

And then loss of control, there’s uncertainty if we go to the casino, but we chose to be there. Hopefully, we set good limits, “I have $100 to lose at Blackjack,” or whatever. And so, it’s like, “Yeah, there’s uncertainty, but I’m not afraid. This is fun. This is exciting.”

So, anyway, I was just mulling over your equation, and that’s what I came to, but you’re the master. Tell us about this equation and how it impacts how we approach situations.

Ranjay Gulati
So, back to what I was saying, when the human brain, when normal people encounter uncertainty, it typically comes also with feeling of loss of control. And when you have both those things happening simultaneously, it activates in us the primal human emotion of fear. In fact, one of the books I read had a whole chapter on what they call the good coward. Because we use the word cowardice or coward as a very, very negative label. It’s one of the worst things you can call somebody.

But actually, I found cowardice is normal. That’s the default for most of us human beings. Courage is an exception. So, the default for most of us in our jobs, whenever we encounter any form of uncertainty, whether it is job uncertainty, or it could be a project uncertainty, it could be a proposal uncertainty, it could be whatever form of uncertainty, the natural, normal human response is one of fear. And we need to get okay with that and not be, first of all, ashamed.

I used to be ashamed of my fear. When I’d get scared, I’m like, “Oh, I’m not allowed to be ashamed, fearful. I mean, geez, look at James Bond and look at Clint Eastwood and look at Jason Bourne and look at all these people. How can I be scared?” Because in my mind, courage was fearless behavior.

But then once I understood that, once I understood that fear was a normal human response, and once I understood that I needed to find a way to tame my fear, I then tried to understand, “How do people, others, how do they resource themselves and what can I learn from that? Are there some systematic things?”

And I found, actually, a body of research that I tried to understand, it was fragmented, and understanding the research and my own research into this, I was able to triangulate and come up with what I thought was a set of practices that all of us can use to make courage accessible to us.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, that sounds very appealing. So, here’s a great starting point, that cowardice is the default, fear is to be expected, no need to shame ourselves. Just understand, “Yep, that’s what’s going to happen here. That’s the natural response.” And, thusly, we can choose to go about doing some empowering. So, yeah, let’s do that.

I understand you’ve got, in your book, the nine Cs of courage: coping, confidence, commitment, connection, comprehension, calm, clan, charisma, and culture. Could you maybe give us the one-minute snapshot of what you mean by each of these things? And then we’ll just have some fun digging into the juiciest bits.

Ranjay Gulati
So just to, first, classify them, the first six Cs are at individual courage. The last three are about organizational courage, or team courage even. So let me start with the individual courage. The first one being coping. It’s important to understand that human behavior is not only rational, but it’s also interpretive. It’s how we look at situations. How do we draw meaning in storytelling? What is our story?

So, the first piece of coping is, “What’s your story?” If you have a story about, “I need to do something. I’m committed. It’s not “I’m interested.” It’s, “I’m committed,” that’s a different way of coping with the fear. The next one is comprehension, which is, “I’m looking at the gray, the foggy uncertainty out there. I’m not going to just leap into it. I’m going to do what a firefighter does. I’m going to tiptoe my way in and learn and take small steps into it.” So that’s comprehension.

Another one is connection, “I’m not going to go alone. Courage is not a solo sport. It takes a village. What kind of support do I have that boosts up my courage? I know there are people who give me emotional support, resource support, information support, and even feedback support. Do I feel boosted by the people who are backing me up?”

The next one is conviction, “Do I have conviction? Do I believe in it? Is there some kind of moral imperative underneath it? I need to do this because…” “How does it tie to my purpose?” The next one is confidence. Confidence is not just that I have the skills to do this job. Underneath it is this kind of can-do spirit, “I’ve got this.” How do you build up that kind of a Navy SEALS mindset? How do you build that up to be emboldened?

The next one is calm, “How do I keep calm in the face of the turmoil that fear can unleash? What are the rituals I might have? How do I focus attention on the task at hand and not get distracted? How do I reframe the situation? How do I maybe even use humor to lighten up the situation?” That’s individual courage.

You can then go to collective courage, which I’ll summarize by saying it’s shifting from me to we, “How do I get us all bought in to this idea that we’ve got to do something? How do I make it part of a culture? How do I make it part of our collective rhythm? It’s something we’re meant to do.” So that, in a summary, is the arc of the book, that courage is a choice. You can change and build courage muscles.

Because if you know how to resource yourself, you will find a way to be a lion king. A lion, I’m sorry, not Lion King, the Lion in “The Wizard of Oz.” Different musical.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, well, no, both are excellent and inspiring. Well, there’s so much good stuff to get in here. What I like a lot is comprehension makes a lot of good sense in terms of, “Well, yeah, if there’s a ton of uncertainty, we can get better comprehension and mitigate some of that by going step by step, taking a peek, doing a test, learning, having a conversation, okay, getting there. And action, absolutely. Hey, I’m about to do some stuff. That’s tricky, that’s demanding a lot of me. Let’s make sure I feel well, well-supported, connected with my people.” I like that a lot.

Tell us a little bit when it comes to coping and story. I think that could be a little bit tricky because sometimes I try to tell myself better stories to feel different things. And I know what I’m doing, it’s like, “Hey, Pete, I know you’re trying to trick me into seeing this differently and feeling differently about it, but I’m still scared. I’m still angry. I’m still annoyed. I still don’t feel like it,” like whatever. So, what are your pro tips in terms of coping and storytelling to yourself like a master?

Ranjay Gulati
So, the first thing I’ve realized is we are the biggest storytellers to ourselves. And these stories that we may or may not even be familiar with, it may be implicit, it may be buried deep in my psyche, have a powerful grip on us. They not only shape how we look at situations, but they also shape how we look at ourselves in those situations.

I’ll give you an example. In a recession, how do companies behave? Ninety-one percent of companies just go cost-cutting because the narrative they have is, “In times of uncertainty, survival is key. So cut costs, do whatever you need to do. This, too, shall pass. We’ll see it on the other side.”

Nine percent of companies, only 9% have a different narrative. They see adversity as opportunity, “This is a unique moment to leapfrog everybody else. Yes, it’ll be risky. Yes, there’s uncertainty here, but, you know, this is a unique opportunity. They don’t come very often. So how are we going to leapfrog everybody else in these down markets where everybody else has got their head in the sand?”

So, you start to see how these kinds of self-narratives, individually and collectively, become part of our way of facing uncertainty, because narrative, our own self-narrative, changes our sense of identity, how I see myself. It also changes the way we look at situations around us and the meaning we attribute to those situations.

So, I interviewed a mergers-and-acquisitions lawyer, who is now a commando in Ukraine, behind enemy lines. He said, “Look, I just had to do this. I couldn’t live with myself if I didn’t do anything.” So, what’s my story?

And a lot of people in work have an affirming story that, “I want to have an impact, I want to make a difference here. I want to get ahead. I want to be responsible. I want to be somebody someday.” Others have a rather negating story, “I don’t know if I can do it. I’m not sure. That’s too risky. What if it doesn’t work out?” So, “What’s your story?” is the starting point for this journey.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I like that a lot. It sounds like there’s many flavors of story and they’ll take you down different paths, not just in the rough binary of, “Do this. Don’t do this,” but, “How are we going to approach it? And why is it worthwhile or not worthwhile to do so?” We can examine the story in terms of, “Okay, this is the story that is present.” Do you have any perspective on, once you’re aware of that, what’s the next best step?

Ranjay Gulati
You know, there’s an old saying, “Change your story and change your life,” right? And I think there’s some truth to it. This inner story is kind of like a central operating system that impacts everything we do. We’d like to believe that we have a rational calculative machine in our brain, cost benefit, does the math, looks at the expected value, pros and cons, SWOT analysis, scenario planning, we do that.

But there’s a parallel system that overrides all rational calculus, and that is this interpretive system. And you got to find a way to take and harness that. And a lot of courageous people harness that when they take bold action. Whether you look at Frances Haugen, it was her realization that, “I have to do something,” or, Brandon Tsay, in the moment, saying, “I have to do something.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. It’s interesting. As I think about being in Frances’s shoes, you can very easily tell a story, in terms of it’s like, “Well, you know, corporations, they’re going to maximize shareholder value. So, naturally, of course, Facebook is going to try to do whatever it can to maximize engagement on their platform, and that’s just sort of how business works. And I’m just one of tens of thousands of cogs in this machine. And if I’m not digging this job, I could just try something else.”

And so, like that is a story and that is reasonable in terms of, “Okay, yeah.” I guess, none of those things you would just say, “That is utterly false,” but, like, that is a reasonable story. But then she took another one, it’s like, “What I’m beholding is evil. And it’s quite likely, if I do nothing, nobody else will either. So, it is up to me to stop this evil.” And, likewise, those two, those points are also valid, reasonable, rational. And so, which story you’re operating in really would direct the subsequent steps and path.

Ranjay Gulati
Absolutely and very well said. But I think story is the first step in this courage journey. The reason I have all these other Cs is because then you resource yourself. So, take Frances, she didn’t do it alone. She forged connections to really help her find that courage. It took her almost a year to do this after she first thought about it.

She was talking to a reporter who was guiding her on what needed to be done. She was talking to a law firm that helps whistleblowers on what needed to be done over there. She had a friend of hers who was a priest giving her personal feedback on how she should do it. She was talking to her parents who were giving her the moral support, and saying, “Come on, you got to do something.”

So, connections played a key role over there. Another one is confidence, “How did she build up her can-do muscle?” “I got it. I can do it. And you know what? I’ll be okay on the other side of this.” So, there are several other resourcing tools I found. So, it wasn’t just an isolated thing.

Brandon Tsay had moral conviction, “This is my family thing and I’m the custodian here, and my mother who’s passed away is looking up from there and I’m going to hide under a table?” So, he had a moral conviction. So, conviction played a key role as well. Right? So, each of them has resourced themselves in different ways.

Back to Frances Haugen, she didn’t do it all at once. She kind of decided to methodically understand and do it step by step. So that’s why I had to build this model, if I may, of “What are the resources available to all of us to build up that courage muscle?”

Pete Mockaitis
Boy, that’s really powerful, “My mother’s looking down from heaven. And so, who am I going to be? Am I going to be hiding here?” And I think that’s really a beautiful illustration of the power of story there, because, in a way, like they’re just facts. Like, “My mother previously passed away.” Like, that is a fact, that is a reality that is present in his world. But then when we bring that into the picture, it is transformative.

Ranjay Gulati
And I think the part to understand for all of us is, if we look at the magnitude of what these people did, and we’re like, “I could never do that.” But I think it’s really important to understand how they resource themselves. It wasn’t just a James Bond, Jason Bourne move, where you’re jumping off of a cliff with or without a parachute, and somehow magically you survive.

These people are very thoughtful. And how do we do that? We don’t have to be a Navy SEAL or a Marine to do this stuff. And back to the workplace, I think my realization about the workplace is, it turns out, the two most common emotions people experience at work are fear and anger.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s a bummer of a work day, “I was angry and then I was scared, and then I was angry again, then scared some more.”

Ranjay Gulati
Yeah, and I think, if there was more courage, more people would be able to live up to their full potential. I think that’s what happens when we live frustrated lives because we don’t. In fact, some research on regret shows that people have much more regret about inaction than about action. And I think we should all contemplate that, “How am I tackling the natural normal?” It’s okay to be scared, by the way, first of all, right? That’s normal. The question is, “What do I do with the fear response?”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, you mentioned Navy Seal for the second time, and I did want to dig into the confidence point. My listeners are often saying, “I want more confidence.” Tell us, how does one facilitate, cultivate more of this can-do spirit, Navy Seal, getting after it, kind of confidence?

Ranjay Gulati
So, I was really struggling with this chapter because I thought, “Do people really want to know how to build more confidence? Come on.”

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, yes, they do. We do.

Ranjay Gulati
There’s actually some great research on the subject by a Stanford psychologist named Albert Bandura. He didn’t call it confidence. He called it self-efficacy. And there turned out to be two broad flavors of self-efficacy. One is very domain specific, “I’m the master of my craft. I’m a great marketeer. I’m a great salesman. I’m a great technologist. I’m a great HR professional. I’m a great whatever.” And you need that.

Domain mastery is critical to having confidence, but is not sufficient. There’s another meta skill that, loosely, we can call a kind of a can-do mindset, “I got it.” Where, you know, if you look at Captain Sullenberger, he had never landed a plane on a water body, right, but that’s what he had to do when he had to land the United Airlines plane, when the engine shut down after the flight taking off from LaGuardia. It’s this kind of, “I’ve got this” mindset.

In fact, when he was interviewed by Katie Couric afterwards, and Katie asked him, like, “What did you have to do to land the plane?” He said, “Oh, I knew what I had to do. I had to have the wings exactly level. I had to have the nose slightly up. I had to be flying above the minimum flying speed, but not below it and not too high above it either. And I had to do them all at once.”

And then she says, “But there was a big if.” And then he turns around, and says, “I knew I could do it.” How did he know he could do it? He never trained for it before, never simulated it before, but he said, “I knew I could do it.” That is confidence. And how do we cultivate that kind of inner spirit is one of the hardest challenges for all of us. But once we have it, we’re the Lion in The Wizard of Oz.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah. So, tell us, what do we know from the good doctor Bandura and other research about how one cultivates such a spirit?

Ranjay Gulati
So, he talks about a number of things. In fact, his original experiment was to train, I don’t know, 10, 12 Stanford students who were fearful of snakes. I think they’re called Ophidiophobes, and who say, “I’m scared of snakes” to come into a lab, and then he showed them a corn snake. Corn snakes are harmless, but they look vicious. They’re huge. They don’t bite. They don’t know anything else, but they’re huge.

And he was going to make them hold it. And they’re like, “I don’t want to be even in the room with it.” And so, he talks about first creating micro-wins, small steps. He talks about rehearsing failure modes, “What’s the worst thing that can happen? I want you to start thinking about what’s the worst thing that can happen.” And slowly start to build evidence and build self-belief that, “You got it. You can do it.”

Or, another example of this, a modern example, is what Navy SEALs do. They make the Navy SEALs in training go through all kinds of crazy scenarios. And once you’ve gone through boot camp and training, you’re like, “There’s nothing that’s going to surprise me.” So, how do you create this kind of inner muscle, that, “I can handle”? And that kind of can-do spirit, I think is key.

I think if you look at teaching, by the way, I teach at HBS, and we teach by the case method, which is a very Socratic method, where students can speak. My first time, I’m like, “God, people will ask crazy questions. They might make crazy comments. They might get into arguments with each other. What am I going to do?” So, you start to learn and you see different scenarios and you kind of build your domain-specific craft. But there’s a meta skill, you’re like, “You know, I’ll figure it out. We’ll figure it out.”

So, there’s a specific skill and then there’s a meta skill. And I think that is key. And I think, I had to do that myself, by the way. Also, I have a pilot’s license. The first time I flew, I was scared, terrified, even with the instructor in the plane. Then afterwards, after starting my flight school, I thought, “Okay, I’m okay as long as he’s in the plane with me because he’s a seasoned guy. He can land a plane without an engine. He’s done it all. He’s been around. He’s been flying for 25 years. I’m okay.”

But then I had to get on a plane by myself, and I’m like, “Oh, there are so many things that can go wrong. I haven’t trained for all of them. I need him on the radio. Hey, Jerry, are you going be on the radio? Because if I get, if there’s something crazy happen, I want to be able to call you, my lifeline.” But ultimately, I had to fly away from home base where I couldn’t radio him.

Now you’re on your own. You’re like, “Oh, Seattle SeaTac Airport is saying I’m flying too close to commercial lanes. What do I do? What do I do? Do I go higher or lower?” So, how do you build that kind of can-do muscle?

Pete Mockaitis
And so, it sounds like the two key principles there was, one, getting progressive exposure, like to the snakes, “A little bit, a little bit, a little bit more, a little bit more, a little bit more.” And then another is the meta skill of, “Oh, again and again and again, I have entered into situations that were murky and tricky and unclear, and I managed to figure it out. And this will be similar to my previous historical experience. Therefore, I could feel confident.”

Ranjay Gulati
Absolutely, the evidence builds self-belief. How do you let evidence build self-belief? A third version of that is how do you rehearse failure modes? You have to rehearse failure modes, “What can go wrong? Let’s go through everything that can go wrong.” And the rehearsing of failure modes also quietens us down because you’re like, “Okay, what can go wrong here?” And you start to rehearse the failure modes to see that there’s nothing outside the realm of your thinking.

And they use this, actually, a lot also in kind of flight anxiety schools, where people who are paranoid about flying would never get on an airplane. Well, airlines don’t like that, so they all have these flight anxiety management schools where you can go online or in-person and take a class, where they make you sit on a chair that feels like an airplane seat, and it vibrates when the plane is taking off.

You put on your seatbelt. They even have some turbulence, so you simulate the turbulence, you simulate the plane landing and taking off. So, the idea is to kind of immunotherapy, if you will, but a bit of kind of rehearsals, but, ultimately, you’re trying to let evidence build self-belief, that growing of self-belief.

And, you know, sometimes, I’ll tell you what confidence comes from, I’ve found. I’ve seen this in sports a lot, actually, by the way. Sometimes the biggest source of self-confidence is somebody else believing in you. That’s what coaches do so well. The great coaches, they believe in their players. And when they believe in their players, if you think about one of the classic plays was Duke-Kentucky game, National Championship.

I think it was a semi-final, maybe, I think, considered one of the best games ever. Coach K was the coach of Duke. And there was, I think, 2.5 seconds left, something like that. And Kentucky just scored a basket. And they were now, I think, one point ahead. And Duke had two and half seconds to get the ball across the court and hit a basket.

And when the players were asked, Grant Hill threw the pass, and I’m blanking on who threw the basket, but what is his name? Famous. He was an NBA player afterwards. They did it because they knew their coach believed they could do it. And if the coach believed they could do it, they could do it.

So, building self-belief is a huge part of the story as well. So, find yourself somebody who believes in you, and you’ll start to believe in yourself. That’s what moral-emotional support really is.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s powerful and beautiful. And to the rehearsing failure modes, I mean, maybe you strap into a chair that’s vibrating, but I think sometimes that could just be a matter of really just thinking it through and visualizing the situation. I remember after I left Bain and started my own thing, it was spooky because I didn’t have revenue and my savings were depleting day after day, month after month. It’s like, “Oh, my gosh. It’s like the money is disappearing before my eyes. I’m not accustomed to this.”

And it’s funny, but before I examined that, I almost thought, “Well, what happens when a person’s money balance hits zero? What happens then?” Unexamined, it was like, “Well, I just assumed that I’m homeless and sleeping in an alley.” It’s like, “No, that’s not actually what happens.”

And so, to think about, “Okay, imagine a world in which I have $0. What happens? Oh, I go get a regular job. What are my other Bain people doing? They’re going doing strategy stuff for like Kraft Foods or something. Okay, so I would go be a cheese strategist. This is really the worst-case scenario. And I might even find it interesting, figuring out cheese pricing opportunities or whatever.”

So that’s, that’s much less terrifying than being homeless and sleeping in the alley, and much more realistic. But unexamined, that’s just sort of where the emotions can take us to. And that’s not very, very helpful for making wise, calm decisions.

Ranjay Gulati

That’s a great example. An illustration of what I was saying is that, ultimately, we are all engaged in a mental process to tame or even outwit our fear, right? And if we can tame or outwit our fear, we can take courageous steps in our lives. So, it’s acknowledging, so if we’re at work, it’s first is acknowledging that, “You know what? Fear is a normal human response to uncertainty.”

And guess what? It’s very common in the workplace. But most of us are immobilized by fear. But if I really want to have, I want to thrive and live up to my fullest potential, I got to do something about this fear business. And there are some methodical ways to think and act that allow people to behave courageously.

And that’s what I want to learn. And I hope that, you know, my hope, at least, is in this project is to help people find the resources they need to say, “Here’s a…” for lack of a better word, “…a toolkit that I can use to resource myself to act more boldly.”

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, tell me, Ranjay, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Ranjay Gulati
No, I think, ultimately, I have just one line which is, the forward to the book is written by the Dalai Lama.

Pete Mockaitis
A good get.

Ranjay Gulati
Yeah. And he says, “Courage is an inner journey.” It’s really an inner journey. In my mind, courage is a choice. It’s really a choice. You have to make a choice. If you make a choice, “I want to be courageous,” you will find a way to be courageous. It is ultimately a choice. And I think, you know, I haven’t touched on even the second, last one third of the book, where courage is contagious.

You can build a courageous team. You can build a courageous organization. You can bake it into the DNA. You can be a courageous leader who fosters courage in other people. That’s the next piece of the journey. And I think every person, aspiring leader, needs to understand that. Are you leading a winning team or a not losing team? Are you playing to win or are you playing not to lose?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, this reminds me of the movie “Searching for Bobby Fisher,” where his coach, I don’t know why that still fires me up. He’s like, “Are you playing to win or are you playing to not lose? They’re not the same thing.” And so, you know, he gets the idea from his other coach. Anyway, a fun movie. But now, share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring.

Ranjay Gulati
You know, I already scooped myself when I said courage was an inner journey, but I will add a little bit more to it. What the Dalai Lama says in the forward is, “When we recognize our interdependence, our courage naturally expands beyond personal ambition toward the greater good.”

And I think we should contemplate that. That we have to have a more expansive view of ourselves. And when we do and we see the interdependence of ourselves with the world at large and other people around us, we act with more courage.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite book?

Ranjay Gulati
There’s a book by Jim Loehr, L-O-E-H-R, called The Power of Story. And the title says it all.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Ranjay Gulati
I have a diary in which I take notes, and then I have my little Post-it notes that help me deal with short-term issues. So, I have a diary that I write down my longer-term projects and my thought processes there, and then I use this to kind of keep track of myself. So, you know, living in the world of ideas, there’s always things coming your way.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite habit?

Ranjay Gulati
Getting up early in the morning and, hopefully, trying to work out before the day gets ahead of you.

Pete Mockaitis
If folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Ranjay Gulati
Look, LinkedIn is a great place to find me. I have a newsletter there. I’m reasonably active on it. Otherwise, I have a website where I post a lot of the same similar videos and stuff like that, which is RanjayGulati.com

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Ranjay Gulati
I think we all need to ask ourselves, “Am I really living up to my fullest potential as a courageous human being? And how can I resource myself to be more courageous?”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Ranjay, thank you.

Ranjay Gulati
A pleasure. Thank you so much.

1080: How to Say No When the World Demands Yes with Dr. Sunita Sah

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Dr. Sunita Sah reveals the dangers of compliance and offers strategies for building the skill of defiance.

You’ll Learn

  1. The powerful force that makes saying no so difficult
  2. How to disagree while still being a team player
  3. A super sentence to make defiance easier

About Sunita

Sunita Sah is a national bestselling author, an award-winning professor at Cornell University and an expert in organizational psychology. She leads groundbreaking research on influence, authority, compliance, and defiance. A trained physician, she practiced medicine in the United Kingdom and worked as a management consultant for the pharmaceutical industry. She currently teaches executives, leaders, and students in healthcare and business. 

Dr. Sah is a sought-after international speaker and consultant, advisor to government agencies, and former Commissioner of the National Commission on Forensic Science. Her multidisciplinary research and analyses have been widely published in leading academic journals and media entities including The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, Harvard Business Review, and Scientific American. She lives with her husband and son in New York.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Sunita Sah Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Sunita, welcome!

Sunita Sah
Thank you. It’s wonderful to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m so excited to dig into some of the wisdom in your book, Defy: The Power of No in a World That Demands Yes. Could you kick us off with a particularly intriguing, fascinating discovery you’ve made about us humans and defying from your research?

Sunita Sah
Yes, absolutely. I mean, this book really came from decades of research and also my own personal experience growing up as a good girl, really. I remember asking my dad when I was quite young, “What does my name, Sunita, mean?” And he said, “In Sanskrit, Sunita actually means good.” And mostly I lived up to that.

So, I did what I was told, got up when I was told to, went to school on time, did all my homework as expected, because these are often messages that many of us received in childhood, not just from parents, but from teachers and the community, it’s to be good. And what does that really mean? We think it’s to fit in, to obey, to do as we’re told.

And that’s the dynamic that becomes very familiar to a lot of people, I’ve found, that we start equating compliance with being good, and defiance with being bad. And then when we grow up into adults, it becomes very difficult for a lot of people to defy because it has such a negative connotation. And it becomes so hard to defy an order, even an unspoken one, from an authority up here or even a stranger.

And so, when we actually need to resist something, to do what we think is the right thing to do, it becomes very difficult, indeed.

Pete Mockaitis
Wow! And so, when you say good and bad, we don’t just mean, you know, kind of desirable and pleasant, but rather morally, ethically, good, bad, like noble and/or evil.

Sunita Sah
Yes, absolutely. That’s what we think. We think the right thing to do is what we get told to do a lot of the time because we often think people in authority know best and we would often hope for that, but it’s not always true. So, what happens when we need to resist that? That becomes really important. And even if we think about, like, our workplaces, what do people mean by a good employee? It’s often someone who’s seen as going along with things, being agreeable, doing what their boss wants them to do.

And when we start equating our moral behavior in terms of how well we complete a task or how well we obey our boss, things become really constrained to just the cubicle that we sit in, and we forget about the larger picture, what’s going on, the larger impact to other people, to ourselves, to society in general. And that can really erode the soul at times. It can be soul-destroying, in a way, if you keep bowing your head to other people and disregarding your values.

Pete Mockaitis
Absolutely. Well, this is so big and there’s so many directions we can run with it, so let’s go with your book. So, what would you say is the big idea or core message there?

Sunita Sah
It’s really to reframe defiance, because I’ve been so fascinated by what that single powerful word, defy, means for such a long time. And if I ask people, you know, “How many times have you wanted to object to something or opt out of something, but you end up just going along with it, you end up swallowing your words?”

And we think that it’s so good to be compliant, but when I really delved into the research, and I conducted my own research, I really saw how compliant we are and it can end up causing serious problems. So, for example, one survey found that nine out of 10 healthcare workers, most of them nurses, felt too uncomfortable to speak up when they saw a colleague making an error.

And it’s also not just in medicine, across industries, another one found that in more than 1,700 crew members on commercial airlines, only half of them spoke up when they noticed an error. So, these are situations you want people to be speaking up, right? And so, you start to wonder, “Is it sometimes bad to be so good? And what do we actually sacrifice by being so compliant?”

And when I spent more time looking at this and finding this dynamic in so many areas, even when it’s not life and death, what I found that I think is crucial and really substantially changed how I think is that we’ve simply misunderstood what it means to defy.

So, I came to this revelation that we need a new definition for defiance because this old definition that often has negative connotations is that to defy is to challenge the power of another person, openly and boldly. Whereas, my definition of defiance is simply to defy is to act in accordance with your true values when there is pressure to do otherwise.

So, it becomes this positive force, a proactive, even pro-social force in society because, if we think about all our individual acts of compliance, of consent, of dissent, they really build the places that we live in, our workplaces, our homes, our communities.

And that’s why it’s really important to understand what we mean by compliance, by consent, by defiance, and how to live a life really aligned with your values.

Pete Mockaitis
This is very powerful stuff, and the word defy really has a lot of power to it. And thinking from an American context, in some ways, we celebrate it, like, “Yeah, to defy, we’re going to defy King George, and revolution. This country is born and we have freedom because we defied,” or, “We are going to defy the injustice of slavery,” or, Rosa Parks.

It’s, like, it sparks within us something beautiful and strong, and we dig it. And yet, when push comes to shove and we’re right there in the emotional moment, we don’t have good pleasant hero-vibes associated with defying someone who’s right in front of our face.

Sunita Sah
Yeah, that’s exactly right. I mean, there’s so much in what you said about what our image of defiance is and what defines actually can be. So, one aspect is, as you said, that in America, we’re sort of valued for being free-thinkers and we like our agency and independence. And yet in my research, I found that there’s such a high level of compliance.

Like, even a very simple one with no consequences for saying no, if you give people two options, option A and option B, just giving them the choice, pretty much everyone over 95% chooses option A because it’s just much better for you, right?

But if you have someone just telling them to choose option B with absolutely no consequence if they said no, it’s just a stranger, I find really high levels of compliance, going up to like 85%, which is ridiculous. And when they have an opportunity to change their mind in private, they will do so. So, it really shows the difference between what our public behavior and our private preferences.

And what I aim to do is really get that gap mitigated so people can act in alignment with what their preferences actually are. And responding to what you just said about our image of defiance, one of the myths about defiance is that it has to be loud and aggressive and maybe violent. It is about revolution, but it doesn’t have to be. It can be done in a very quiet way.

And really done in a way that’s more natural to us. We don’t have to change who we are. It’s just a skillset. It’s not a personality. And so, once we learn to defy, that is key to sort of making better decisions, in general.

Now, if we think about Rosa Parks, because she is famous for her no on the bus, but she actually complied many times before with segregation laws before she said her famous no. And so, we have to think about, like, we can be compliant one day and defiant the next. We have to choose the time where it’s going to be sort of both safe and effective.

Now you could argue that it wasn’t actually safe for Rosa Parks, it was never going to be safe for her, but she made that particular decision that day, even though it was preceded by probably hundreds of moments of compliance. And that gives us hope because it’s not about defiance just being an emotional response.

Yes, it can be based on some emotion, it can be based on her belief of really believing in equality here and wanting to stand up for something, or sit down for her principles. But it really is connecting with our values and learning how to defy, because that is the one thing that many of us have not been trained to do. We’ve been so trained in compliance, we don’t actually know once we decide to defy, we don’t actually know how to do it.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, so I’d actually like to dig into some of the details there with that 90% of folks will pick A over B, unless someone tells them, “Hey, pick B.” Could you zoom us right into that social psychology experiments in terms of what is A and what is B? What are people being presented with?

Sunita Sah
Right. So, I conducted a series of experiments, mostly in the US, where I have people pick between two different lotteries. So, they’re different prizes in the lotteries, but lottery A is twice the expected value of lottery B. It’s just worth so much more. So, of course, most people are going to go with lottery A. It’s the superior lottery. And why would you not choose it?

But if I pair them with a stranger, and just call that stranger an advisor and the participant as the chooser, and the advisor then says, “You should go for option B,” because either they know or they don’t know that the advisor is actually going to be paid more if they get to choose this option B. So, they’re really giving them bad advice, poor quality advice.

What happens is, even when the choosers, the participants, have full information, they feel too uncomfortable to say no to this stranger. And so, they go with option A, and they say it’s because of this social pressure to go along with people around them. And what I’ve found in my research is one aspect of this social pressure I call insinuation anxiety.

And it’s a distinct type of anxiety that we have when we worry about our non-compliance with another person’s wishes, that it’s going to be interpreted as a signal of distress. It’s going to insinuate that the person is not who they appear to be or should be.

So, for example, if your doctor tells you to do something, it’s quite difficult to say no because it insinuates that they can’t be trusted, they’re incompetent. And we don’t like to do that. We don’t like to do that with our friends, our peers, our trusted advisors, our colleagues.

And so, this aversive emotional state that we have keeps us quiet and compliant, and it’s actually quite powerful. It could range from, for example, something small, like you’re at the hairdressers and they’re saying, “Trust me with this new haircut,” and they’re cutting away and you just want to say, “Stop!” A lot of people, if you’re like me, find it very difficult to say so. We might just smile and say, “That’s great,” and even tip them at the end of the day.

Or it could be the life-and-death decisions that I’m talking about, the nurses unable to tell a physician that they’re making a mistake, or the co-pilot unable to tell the pilot that they think this is the wrong way to go. So, that force, that insinuation anxiety, this reluctance to signal distrust to someone else, because we don’t want to insinuate that they’re untrustworthy, is really quite powerful.

So, we have to understand that it comes up in these social interactions that we have, and figure out how we can decrease that social pressure so we can overcome insinuation anxiety and speak up for what we think is the right thing to do.

Pete Mockaitis
You know what this brings up for me is, just recently, I was trying to upgrade some internet speed, so I called up Comcast Xfinity, which is an infamously unpleasant experience for folks. And I was speaking with someone, and they said, “Oh, yeah, well, this plan will have 300 megabits per second upload speed as well.” I was like, “Oh, okay, well, that’s pretty good.”

But when I looked at the website, it says 41 is the upload speed. And it was interesting because, like, before my eyes, I’m looking at one thing, he is telling me another. And I said, “Well, could you help me understand why it is I’m looking at 41 and you’re saying 300?” He was like, “Oh, well, you know, recently they upgraded the speed.”

It’s like, “Okay, that’s cool. It’s plausible that upgrade hasn’t made it over to the webpage that I’m looking at yet. Could you send that to me so I could see what you’re looking at?” And for whatever reason, it wasn’t sending. And it was wild how, even though I’m looking at it with my own two eyes, I’m thinking, “Well, this guy works for Comcast Xfinity. He’s saying this with conviction, and that he has some sort of reference,” and I was just stuck.

We went through, we went in circles for more than an hour on this matter because I had to figure it out for myself, it’s like, “Well, I guess we’ll get it and I could see for myself, and if it’s no good, I’ll cancel it.” And so, that’s where we landed.

And even in, like, a social status-y position, I guess, like, I am the customer, this is a customer service person. I will never see this person again. But I could not bring myself to reject fully his assertion. It’s like, “No, you are wrong. I’m looking at it with my eyes. I reject what you say and we’re done with this conversation.” I could not bring myself to do it even in the rosiest of circumstances, and our compromise was, “Well, I guess I’ll see what happens.”

Sunita Sah
That’s how difficult it is because it seems so confrontational. It seems like you’re implying that this person is lying to you, lying straight out. And that’s so hard to do because, as a society, we value integrity so much. We do not want to be known as being an untrustworthy person.

And that’s why it becomes so difficult to tell someone else that, “I don’t think you’re telling me the truth here, right? This is my experience. I’m seeing something different and so you must be wrong.” It’s just so hard to say. And that is classic insinuation anxiety.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, and if anyone was curious, sure enough, the speed was 41, as my eyes told me in defiance, or in contradiction, I should say, of what he had to say.

Sunita Sah
Did you cancel? I’m dying to know if you canceled.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I mean, once AT&T is hooked up, I’m canceling that one, so they’ve lost me. And sort of that’s how that unfolded. Okay, so it’s powerful. It’s in us. And so, we’ve got these emotional learned things all hooked up in our brains and emotions and nervous system that, “Oh, compliance is morally good and noble and wholesome, and defiance is bad or evil, objectionable and not something you want to do.”

So, then that is a bit of a pickle. So, can you share with us, before we get into the how, just kind of what sorts of goodness is on the other side if we manage to overcome this? Could we hear a tale of perhaps a professional who got really good at defiance and what kind of cool results that opens up for them?

Sunita Sah
I mean, for me, this was my journey from learning how to be bad at times, what people might say bad at times, because I went along to get along. I was good. I listened to what teachers told me. I just did what I was told. And then when I found that, like, teachers can be unfair and people can make errors, it just dawned on me that, if I really wanted to be living up to the values I thought was important, I had to learn how to defy.

And so, I found that these five stages of defiance, which is part of the skill of learning how to defy, and stage one is actually pretty important because this is one that people might be able to relate to, that you might be able to relate to in just what you were telling me about your experience with Comcast, is that the first stage is tension.

We have this tension between what is happening, the situation, what’s expected of us, and what we actually think is the right thing to do. And that tension can manifest in different ways, right? Some people just feel deeply uncomfortable. Some people feel a knot in their stomach. They feel some general unease, a tight throat. It manifests in us in different ways.

So, getting used to that sign is really important because that first stage of tension is really important to register and acknowledge to ourselves. And that’s like moving to the second stage, because what we often do is say it’s not worth our doubt, it’s not worth our anxiety, and so we sweep it away.

But after I learned how to defy, and what I’ve seen in many of the people I’ve interviewed, and in my research, is that if you can get to stage five, which is the final act of defiance, that tension that you had in the first stage, it just dissipates. So, if you just try to sweep it away at the beginning and say, “It’s not worth it. The other person knows better,” it comes back, it stays with us. We feel a lot of resentment.

And even though we often think that, “Oh, I’m going to upset someone,” “I’m going to lose a relationship,” “I’m going to lose my job even,” we don’t think so much about the costs of compliance, which can be significant. This tension, this anxiety, this stress, it can keep us up at night. It can lead to chronic inflammation, burnout, dissatisfaction, so many things.

Whereas, if we can live in alignment with our values, that tension dissipates, we feel more joy, we feel more authentic, and ultimately, it’s a more honest life. We feel like we’re making progress. We can be more of ourselves, which is something that, you know, we don’t want to give our soul away to be a good employee, right?

And so, that’s something that we really have to remember that, on the other side, that living a life aligned with what you think is the right thing to do is really reclaiming your agency. It’s very powerful.

Pete Mockaitis
It is powerful. That’s a good feeling. I want to zero in on the tension point. I think it’s also possible that you can defy and then have lingering worries of, “Oh, no, have I upset them? Is our relationship now in a bad place? Oh, are they going to come back at me in terms of retribution? Or are we no longer…?” whatever, dah, dah, dah. There’s any number of, like, little anxious worries and upset-ness that can linger with us post-defiance. What do you think about those?

Sunita Sah
Yeah, and these are the things that often keep us silent is because we have these worries before we defy. And, defiance in itself, and compliance actually, both are inherently risky, in a way, like, neither action is like risk-free because there could be great harm that comes from compliance. We’ve seen that in history, that unchecked compliance can lead to devastating consequences.

And so, this aspect of regret, a lot of people regret not speaking up when they could do. That’s a huge aspect of the cost of compliance. Do we regret defiance? Maybe sometimes we do if we haven’t thought about, “Is this the right place and time?” So, one of the aspects of considering, “Is this situation going against my values?” is one question that we can ask ourselves.

And then, “Is it safe? And will it be effective?” And that’s a very individual choice of learning how to defy and when to defy is figuring out. You know, Rosa Parks, as I said, it wasn’t safe for her. She received many death threats from her action, and yet it was effective. It was effective. And she made a strategic choice that day. And she had, like, a couple of really good examples.

When she was a child, she saw her own mother refuse to move on the bus for a white passenger. And that must have stayed with her. And I talk quite a bit about this sort of ripple effect of parents because I was brought up in a pretty compliant environment myself, and my mom especially, I thought was very compliant until one day I saw her defiance, and that stayed with me.

And so many people have told me about the ripple effect of their parents. So, it’s a great role model for that. But she was very strategic in that she waited for that particular moment to say no. And she had the community behind her, and she could make a difference.

So, understanding what your own defiance calculus is and knowing that you’re acting in alignment with something that’s really important to you, really reduces that element of regret of, you know, this is something that you feel that you have to speak up when it matters most.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, that’s great. Great thinking there in terms of it’s like our default mode is compliance and that is profoundly suboptimal because compliance may or may not be the right answer, all things considered.

And so, at the very least, if we can stop and say, “Hey, does this match my values? Is this safe? Is this effective?” It’s like, “No, I’m doing lottery A, of course. And then that’s that,” is super handy. And then occasionally, the decisions get rather tricky in terms of, “Is this the time and the place for my defiance?”

Sunita Sah
Yeah, absolutely. That’s a wonderful summary. And I think you’re right as well, it does get tricky for people, like, “How do you decide?” And I always say, ask yourself, “Is it safe enough? Will it be effective enough?” Because if we say, “Is it safe? Is it effective?” we could just use that as a rationalization to never act, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, sure.

Sunita Sah
Because it’s never going to be 100% safe. It’s never going to be 100% safe.

Pete Mockaitis
“Because this person could flip out and assault me.” “How dare you pick lottery A? Are you saying I’m an idiot? Aargh!!”

Sunita Sah
Yes, even though the chances of that were pretty slim with everybody around you, and you know you’re taking part in this particular experiment. But it’s true that people will have a different calculus because it is a very individual choice. And many people defy even when they don’t know if it’s going to be effective because they so strongly believe in doing what they think is the right thing to do in that particular situation.

Pete Mockaitis
But just to really highlight, as you’re doing the calculus, you’re weighing it out, the resentment and regret on the side of compliance when that was not worthwhile, will often weigh much stronger psychically than the worry of, “Uh-oh, is something bad going to happen?”

And one more piece I think is undervalued in the weighing of compliance versus defiance is that, like a boss in particular, I love it when I get smart defiance in terms of, so I bought this business, Cashflow Podcasting, our CEO is fantastic, and so I am an owner. And so, she could just do the things I say, but some of the times, she really proves how exceptionally competent and capable she is, in my own estimation, is when she is telling me well why I’m wrong.

I was like, “Hey, what if we change the survey to have, like, 12 options here?” And she’s like, “Well, I mean, we could do that, but my concern is that they will simply not reply because it will be overwhelming with too many options.” I was like, “Okay, yeah, you’re right. It’s like you have told me why I’m wrong in an excellent way that supports what we’re trying to accomplish here. I value that.” As opposed to, if you have a total sycophant, who is like, “Okay, yeah, whatever you say, Pete. You’re the boss,” then we’re getting suboptimal outcomes for what we’re working on.

Sunita Sah
Yeah, absolutely. To be a good boss, to be a good leader, you don’t want just yes-people around you because you’re not going to have any creativity, you’re not going to have any innovation. It’s really the death of creativity in that aspect. If you want your business to succeed, if you don’t want a high turnover, you need to really reward defiance in your workplace and see it as this positive aspect.

And so, creating those environments where people feel that they can speak up, so it’s great that your assistant can speak up to you, right, the people that you work with can speak up and say, “Actually, this would be my concern if we went down that line.” And that it’s effective as well.

So, I found like the two main reasons that people don’t speak up in the workplace is that they don’t think it’s safe, they think there’s going to be repercussions for them speaking up, or that they don’t feel any fear. They think it’s safe enough but they’ve spoken up many times before nothing happens so it’s not effective anymore.

And so, if as a leader, we can like create workplaces where people will not be penalized for speaking up, and you take action and show that it’s effective when they do come up with a fantastic idea, or that they stop you doing something that would have thrown the business off a cliff, then that is wonderful that we can create those places that’s going to be far more successful and retain far more people for the long term.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, so can we zoom right into the heat of battle, there’s something coming our way, we think, “Hmm, it doesn’t seem quite right to me.” We’ve got our five stages. Can we hear, what are the stages? What does it feel like? And what’s our best practice to move on through and defy effectively?

Sunita Sah
Yeah, so these five stages are really helpful to think about, like, once we get really experienced with the defiance, we might not go through all of them. Some of us at the beginning might go back and forth, but they’re useful, it’s a useful framework. So, as I said, stage one is tension. It’s like that tension that you feel somewhere.

Sometimes we know that something is wrong before we’ve even consciously registered it. But I’m not talking about like a gut feel here. I’m not talking about an emotional reaction to something. I’m talking about that tension between what’s expected of us and what we think is the right thing to do.

So, here, we want to think, “Why am I having that tension?” and acknowledge it to ourselves. So, stage two is really acknowledging there’s something uncomfortable here and trying to understand why. And the reason I say that is not just a gut feeling, is that there’s different types of tension that we can experience from our gut, right?

One is expert intuition that we’ve done something so many times before, we know that this is the wrong thing to do in this situation, or, like, this is the way that we should go, and we know it instantly once we see a particular pattern.

So, the best way to describe this is like a chess grandmaster when they see a pattern on the board. They’ve experienced it many times before. So, you need a predictable environment, immediate feedback, hundreds of repetitions to get that expert intuition.

Gut feel is something different, and it could be expert intuition or it could just be our biases, and be able to distinguish between the two is really important. So, we have that tension, we acknowledge it, we figure out what it means, and that’s stage two, stage one and stage two.

Then stage three is one of the critical stages. And this is really just vocalizing your attention externally to someone else. So, it can be something as little as, “I’m not comfortable with that,” or, “What did you mean by that?” or, “Can you clarify that?” So, it’s asking questions and just stating that you’re uncomfortable.

And the reason this stage is so critical is due to a number of things. First of all, the research shows that if you can get to stage three, you’re much more likely to get to stage five. So, learning how to get to stage three, and those little questions or clarification things are really important because, once you ask for clarification, you raise volume on the situation, you change the environment somehow.

And you’ve put it out there that you’re not comfortable, which means you can’t go back in time and then say, oh, you were fine with it to begin with if you comply. That cognitive dissonance can’t kick in if you’ve already said that you’re not comfortable with it. So, that’s stage three is just, you can still be in a subservient position. You can just be asking your boss for clarification here.

Stage four is when you actually say you can’t comply, that you can’t go along with this. And you could have conditions, “Unless this happens, or that happens, or this happens,” or you can’t go along with it because of these concerns. And then stage five, as I said, is the final act of defiance, that you say no, you don’t go along with it, and that’s when you see that tension dissipate.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, what I like a lot in step three, escalation, is it sounds like you can vocalize anything any way professionally in terms of like and then it is very helpful for us, in terms of you say, “Oh, we could do that. Although, might that result in this?” And it’s just, like, super friendly, super professional but you have articulated something. And just doing that does a lot for us.

Sunita Sah
Exactly. This is where people can defy in their own unique way with far less angst than they used to have, because we need to get rid of the myth that defiance is a particular way or a particular personality. We can do it in a way that feels most natural for us and becomes comfortable. So, we can practice that even if it’s just a little script.

I love this, “What do you mean by that?” When we hear something in a meeting and we don’t think it’s quite right, it’s like, “What do you mean by that?” then the other person has to repeat it and explain it. And if there’s like some logic that doesn’t make sense, then everybody else gets to hear it too. And what you’ve done is you’ve put it out there, you’ve changed the water in which everybody is swimming.

And even that person that’s saying that thing might think, “Oh, okay, maybe it isn’t such a good idea.” Maybe they will, maybe they won’t, but people have heard it, you’ve heard it, and that makes a big difference. So, it’s just a small thing that you put out there in the environment that can make a massive difference.

Pete Mockaitis
“Sunita, what I mean is we should break the law in order to get more money.”

Sunita Sah
“Can you just clarify that? Can you clarify?”

Pete Mockaitis
“Like, that’s kind of what I was worried about.”

Sunita Sah
Right. Interesting. You see, now it’s out there and everybody’s heard it.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. All right. Well, so then, when you say scripts, I love scripts. Can you give us some other favorite turns-of-a-phrase that work wonders?

Sunita Sah
Yeah, so I have to stress “What do you mean by that?” It’s such a great one that I use over and over again. It’s so simple. Just, “I’m not comfortable with that.” Like, for example, when you were talking to them about your internet speed, and you know the fact that it’s different to what you’re saying, “I’m not comfortable with that.”

It’s a great opening into, “Yeah, I’m not sure that’s quite right for me, you know. I’m not feeling comfortable here. What can you say to make me feel more comfortable?” And then they will be acting with conviction, it’s like, “I’m still not comfortable with this,” right? It’s sticking to it at that point. So, they’re two great ones, “What do you mean by that?” “I’m not comfortable with this.”

“Can you clarify? Can you clarify?” again is another one. Just use those three. And then the other thing that you can do is think about many of the situations that need our defiance are ones that we’ve experienced again and again. As I said, Rosa Parks had been on that bus many times before. She’d experienced it, many other situations before.

So, think about the situations that we’re in that we comply that doesn’t sit right with us, and then think, “What is it that I wish I would have said or how I could have said it?” Because sometimes we can follow up, like, if email is easier for you, you can maybe compose like a very polite email. And I did this quite recently, “Oh, could you help me understand why this decision was made? Any clarification that you can give would be greatly helpful.” And, actually, the decision got reversed, which I was amazed about.

So, just asking those questions, you’re still in a subservient position, but you’re defying, you’re on the stage to the final act of defiance. And even those questions can jump you straight up to stage five.

Pete Mockaitis
And I’m thinking about any general pointers or principles to bear in mind. If we’re worried that if we defy too often, does it seem like, “Oh, you know, Sunita is not a team player. She’s difficult to work with. She’s selfish”? Any thoughts on how we can defend against negative reputational impacts?

Sunita Sah
Yeah. So, a few things there is, first of all, I’m not talking about cooperation. We can all be cooperative, we can all be team players, but often the best thing as a team player is to point out if you’re going down the wrong track. So, the people that you work with that tell you their concerns, do you see them as being difficult or do you see them as being really helpful?

So, a lot of this is to do with how it’s communicated and whether you’re offering great ideas or avoiding huge errors. And again, it depends on the workplace. So, if you’re in a workplace that really can see sort of the benefits of people not being 100% compliant, right? There are some workplaces where you might not be able to do that at all.

But, hopefully, in most of the healthy workplaces that we’re in, when you are defiant, it’s going to be something positive, not just for you in terms of, like, your selfish needs, but for the organization as a whole. And when I look at, like, I’ve interviewed whistleblowers and things, what I’ve found is that these whistleblowers are not doing this for selfish reasons.

If they were, they would not say anything at all because some of the costs of whistleblowing are huge. They are really huge. They take a big toll on people. And I’m not saying that we should be whistleblowers, but actually these people are the ones that really believe in the mission of the organization, and they want to bring the organization up to align with the values that they say that it has. That’s what concerns them.

And so, the people that are defying are actually defying from a great place. It’s the people that are just complying, even when they know that something is wrong, that leads to the negative outcomes most of the time. But I would also add to that that we choose when it’s the right time and the right place for that defiance to be effective, and to be seen as a team player.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, any final thoughts, top dos and don’ts to make sure to mention?

Sunita Sah
Absolutely. So, one of the key things that, you know, once you’ve learned the difference between compliance and defiance and consent, because there’s differences in those aspects, the five stages of defiance, and really got rid of the myth of defiance as being something negative, the key thing that I want from people is that those people that say they want to defy but they don’t know how is to know that it’s not a personality, it’s a practice, and it’s a skillset that we can all learn.

And it’s not just for the brave, for the extraordinary. It’s available and it’s necessary for all of us, and it’s to start building up that skillset. So, I have a defiance compass that asks three questions, “Who am I?” So, it’s really understanding your values and what you stand for. “What type of situation is this?” This is the safety and effectiveness that we were talking about. And then that last question is, “What does a person like me do in a situation like this?”

And this is tapping into your aspirational self to really understand, “If I am a person who values integrity or justice or equality…” whatever you value, “…what would I do in a situation like this?” And that really gets us in alignment with who we aspire to be, who we want to be, rather than regretting by not failing to put our values into action.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Sunita Sah
“Under duress, we don’t rise to the level of our expectations. We fall to the level of our training.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Sunita Sah
Yes. So, I actually really like the Milgram studies, the Obedience to Authority studies. To some people it’s controversial, but what I find really fascinating about these studies, and there’s been a series of them, is that people really often focus on that stark delineation between those that comply and those that defy.

But if you delve into the actual participants, and we’re talking about the study where subjects came in and they were told that they were taking part in a learning experiment. And what actually happened was the experimenter asked them to give harmful electric shocks to another person. And what Milgram found was that two thirds of people would go ahead and give electric shocks up to a very fatal dose of 450 volts just because somebody else told them to.

But when you look at those participants that did comply, they’re not just happily giving the shocks. They’re actually showing signs of nervous behavior. You know, they’re stuttering, they’re sweating, they don’t want to do it, they just don’t know how to say no.

And that gives us a lot of hope in that if we can learn how to defy, then we don’t have to be those people that are pushing the lever for 450 volts when we don’t want to.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Sunita Sah
Animal Farm by George Orwell.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. And a favorite habit?

Sunita Sah
Oh, a daily walk every single day. If I can do it first thing in the morning, it just sets me up for the day.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And is there a key nugget you share with folks that really seems to connect and resonate with them, they quote back to you often?

Sunita Sah
I would say the definition of defiance is one that they come back with, like just learning sort of what defiance actually is. And then also learning the difference between compliance and consent. If you have a minute, I can really quickly take you through the difference between that.

So, compliance is what we have been talking about, something that we were socialized to do, that we slide into it. It’s usually some external force that causes us to do so. But when I think about consent, I take informed consent in medicine and I apply it to other decisions that we make. And for that, we need five elements.

We need capacity, so not being under the influence of drugs or alcohol or being too sick. We need the brain capacity. We need the knowledge, but it’s not just the information. We need the true understanding, which is the third element, like a real grasp of the risks and the benefits and the alternatives.

Then the fourth element is this freedom to say no, because if we don’t have the freedom to say no, it’s merely compliance. It’s not consent. And if those four elements are there – the capacity knowledge, understanding, the freedom to say no – then the fifth element is your authorization, your true yes and your true no.

It’s very different to compliance. Your true yes, consent, is radically different to compliance even though people conflate the two.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Sunita Sah
You can go to my website, which is SunitaSah.com, S-U-N-I-T-A S-A-H dot com. I have a newsletter on Substack which is free to subscribe. It’s called Defiant by Design, and you will get more things, more knowledge about defiance, compliance, and other research on personal and professional growth. And also, you can connect with me on LinkedIn and Instagram. That’s all there on my website.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And do have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Sunita Sah
Have a mindset shift as to what do you think about defiance being a particular way. And then just ask yourself, when you’re in a situation, “Does this situation go against my values? And what would a person like me, with these values, do in a situation like this?”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Sunita, thank you.

Sunita Sah
Thank you very much.

1078: How to Stop Playing Small and Achieve Your Greatest Goals with Richard Medcalf

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Richard Medcalf gets to the heart of why so many high achievers get stuck—and offers a transformative solution for reaching the next level.

You’ll Learn

  1. Why strategy alone won’t get you to the next level
  2. The signs you’re playing too safe or slow
  3. The bold reframe that leads to a more meaningful life

About Richard

Richard Medcalf describes himself as “what you get if you were to put a McKinsey consultant, a slightly unorthodox pastor and an entrepreneur into a blender”.

He is the founder of Xquadrant, which helps elite leaders reinvent their ‘success formula’ and multiply their impact. His personal clients include CEOs of billion-dollar corporations, successful serial entrepreneurs, and the founders of tech ‘unicorns’.

Richard has advised the C-Suite for over 25 years. After a Masters at Oxford University, where he came top in his year, he joined a premier strategy consultancy and later became the youngest-ever Partner. He then spent 11 years at tech giant Cisco in an elite team reporting to the CEO.

Richard is bi-national English/French, lives near Paris, and is happily married and the proud father of two. He has an insatiable love for spicy food and the electric guitar.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Richard Medcalf Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Richard, welcome back!

Richard Medcalf
Hey, Pete, it’s good to see you again.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, it’s funny, the last time I saw your face it was on LinkedIn, and you were hanging out with Richard Branson at his island, and I was like, “Whoa, these strategic initiatives Richard has been talking about seem to have paid off for him.” Can you tell us a bit of the story there?

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, and actually what I’d like to say is, it’s true, but I like to say it, which is that Richard Branson, actually, was the first person to officially ask me for a copy of my new book, which I think is quite a nice story to get. Yeah, I’ll tell you how that happened. I was realizing, I was thinking, “You know what, I need to be doing a bit more speaking.”

So, I pinged a few people that I knew, including one person who’d been on my own podcast, The Impact Multiplier CEO, and I pinged him. I hadn’t spoken to him for a couple of years. He’s a CEO, runs a really interesting business in the US, a very successful guy. And I said, “Hey, just wondering, if you know any events? Are you part of a CEO forum, a YPO group, some kind of group that I might be able to speak at because I think I’ve got an important message?”

And he said, “Oh, I can’t believe I didn’t think about you. I read all your newsletters, I think they’re amazing. I’m a big fan. I’m doing this event at Necker Island. You should come and speak there.” Necker Island, obviously, being Richard Branson’s Caribbean hideaway. So, first of all, I must admit, I feel, “Yeah, he’s just kind of, like, he’s just being nice. I bet you he hasn’t looked at any of my emails.” And I went back and looked at my email software and, sure enough, he’d been religiously opening.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, you see, “Open. Open. Click. Click.”

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, well, not all of them, which is good, because it wasn’t just an automatic thing, but I can see that he was actually, yeah, very regular. Yeah, so he was running an event for 50 entrepreneurs and business leaders on Necker Island. So, I thought, “Hey, that’s like a bucket list opportunity, right, to go and do that.”

So, yeah, so that’s what happened.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, that’s phenomenal. Well, I would say, here you are, really, you are taking time for those strategic initiatives. You’re walking the talk. And I remember you said, and it’s really stuck with me. “Our high-impact strategic initiatives are usually the things that no one is asking from us.” It’s, like, it requires that proactivity, and your story just illustrated it.

You proactively requested referrals, which can be uncomfortable for some people, you know, open yourself up there. And then that person was not exercising proactivity, it’s like, “Oh, I should have thought of you.” And the same thing happens to me when people ask for referrals. It’s like, “Okay, of course. Yes, Justin did an amazing job with my mortgage. Oh, he would like referrals? Of course, he would. We all do.”

But it does not occur to me to, actually, engage my brain and connect him to opportunities until he actually asked. And so, that’s often how it goes. And if you do so, you might end up hanging with Richard Branson.

Richard Medcalf
And, yeah, what you were saying was in my other book, Making Time for Strategy. I have this phrase, “The most important project is the one that nobody is asking you for.” Exactly your point, because it’s generally the thing that we have to generate because it’s not in the current horizon. Everyone’s asking us for all the things that we’re currently doing, basically, and yet the most important project is going to be a capability that only we can see.

And I’d actually go even further now, which is that there’s the most important projects, but there’s also the most important shift in ourselves, is also something that nobody else is asking from us. So, The 10X Reckoning in many ways, which is the name of the book, but it’s really about the personal reinvention that has to go along with going for the next-level goals, going for the thing that scares us, going for the thing that would really make a difference.

So, I’ll give you an example. It’s a minor one, but going back to Necker Island, because we were talking about that. So, there was a moment when… so Richard Branson was kind of circulating a little bit in the group. He wasn’t there all the time, right? He had other things to do.

And after a couple of days, I was like, “You know what, I’m never going to speak to this guy. You know, he kind of comes in and people kind of go over and talk to him. I’m not going to queue up, you know. I don’t want to be that guy.” And my Britishness was coming in, and I kind of thought, “Okay, fine. It’s going to be a lot of great people in this room. That’s fine. I don’t need to get a selfie with Richard Branson or whatever.”

And then, of course, there was a moment when we were having lunch on the beach and he was around and it was like, “Okay, I can go and sit down.” I’m being told to sit down, “But if I sit down now, I’m not going to get to talk to Branson because he’s not ready to sit down and all the rest of it.” So, long story short, but I kind of, I went up to the bathroom, I got my phone out and I did a few things.

And, therefore, in the moment, when he was then ready to come and sit down at the table, I was like, “Great, let’s go.” And I walked around and sat myself right opposite him and we had a great chat. I actually pushed him, asked him some little provocative questions, and I shared some common stories. My father is a hot air ballooning fanatic, so I’ve gone across the English Channel from the UK to France on a hot air balloon.

So, I know he’s gone around the world on a hot air balloon, but, you know, still, made a build a bit of rapport and talks of some stories. And then, at the end, I managed to get the, again, I get a photo with him, which, again, all those things were quite edgy for me because I don’t want to be that guy, the guy who’s edging his way onto the photo or be getting in line or whatever.

Pete Mockaitis
And inconveniencing other people.

Richard Medcalf
Exactly. And it feels like that. And, yet, it’s like, “You know what, if I don’t dare make the ask, who knows what would happen?” And often, our next level is making an ask that feels a bit uncomfortable, right, pushing on a door that feels a bit uncomfortable.

As you said, asking for that referral, getting the selfie, whatever it is, those are the things which do open up new doors because we’re having a conversation now because I got the selfie, well, you know, because I got the photo with him. So, one thing leads to another.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, it got my attention and it got the LinkedIn algorithm’s attention, so, yeah, here we are again, and I’m delighted to be chatting again. So, okay, so The 10X Reckoning is the book, and you sort of shared a smidge of the big idea here, in terms of our own transformation. How would you articulate, what is this reckoning and used for?

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, right. So, I guess the first context is, my main role in life, my main gig is not actually writing books. It’s working with high-level leaders, founders, chief executives, power players, people who are super ambitious, people who secretly want to, often, they want to change the world.

And there’s this part of them that knows they’re capable of another level. But there’s a problem. And the problem is pretty one of three things. The first is you’re stuck. You’re actually stuck in operations. I remember my first book, Making Time for Strategy, that was really talking about that topic. So many people in many levels in an organization realize they can’t get to the next level because they’re just so busy managing the existing responsibilities that they have.

And even at the very top levels of organizations, people are just completely maxed out very often. So, they’re stuck in operations. So, how can you 10X when 1X is already taking everything you’ve got? That’s the first kind of problem. Second problem is when you start to realize you’re playing safe. So, playing safe is, “You know what, life is good. Life is comfortable. And I can just keep doing this.”

So, it’s actually, certainly, starting to play safe because you say, “I know there could be another level, but, ah, could that be too much sacrifice? Is that going to risk my family, my health, my relationships? I don’t want to sacrifice what I had to do in the past because I don’t need to anymore. I don’t need to do this.”

So, there’s a fear that if we go for it, it’s going to just cost too much, be too much risk, too much reinvention. And so, people often go, “Ah, you know, perhaps I should just dabble for a bit or just take on a few interesting side projects. Just keep going as I’m going but not really go for the thing that would actually excite me.” That’s what I call playing safe.

And then the third one is when, actually, people do have a big inspiring vision, but they’re just going slow on it. Their team is not delivering at the pace, the momentum, the ownership that they need to really make it happen. I’m talking to somebody today, an amazing young entrepreneur, but who’s achieved a lot, and actually does have a world-changing mission that he’s on.

And yet, he said to me, “We’re just not tracking right now on it. And, yeah, I dug in a little bit.” He’s being a bit nice. He’s tolerating a few things in his team. He’s not necessarily giving them the full expansiveness of his vision, etc., we can go into the details. But he realized that he was not necessarily leading at the level he needed if he was going to galvanize people around his big vision, and so, that’s going slow.

So, The 10X Reckoning is really this moment when you have this choice, “Am I going to settle for being stuck or just playing safe or going slow? Or am I going to do the reinvention that I need to actually ignite my life’s greatest work and go for that?” I call it a 10X goal. It doesn’t have to be about the money. It doesn’t have to be a financial goal, but it’s about, “Am I going to go for the quantum leap, fulfill my potential, really do the thing I want to do? Or am I going to settle and kind of fade away?” And that’s the 10X reckoning.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, you’re in such an interesting position when you talk to so many high-achieving individuals to be able to identify this as a theme or pattern. Because, often, high-achieving individuals will not share some of these deep-down desires with others because they’re likely to get, “Oh, come on, you’ve got it all. You’ve done it. You’re in a great spot. Stop complaining. Be grateful.” People might say that or they just fear that others would say that.

And so, could you perhaps give us a story that illustrates this phenomenon in terms of someone who has achieved a lot, but they’re in that plateau, and then the transformation, the stuff they did to do that 10x reckoning?

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, I can. So, a client I was working with, I still work with, who, actually, when I started working, he was actually an employee in his business and was actually the head of a business unit, and basically founded this whole business unit. It’s like a digital brand within a larger company.

And he grew this business from zero by himself, built the team out, created it into a seven- or eight-figure business. And we were working together on scaling this business, growing it out with his role as managing director in this company. But I could tell he was frustrated.

He was frustrated that the company, the shareholders were not ready to invest in his tech business because they had the cash cow business. They didn’t want to, like, spend money on investing in this high-growth potential tech business. And so, he felt he couldn’t really play the game the business was designed to play.

And what I really said to him was, “Look, you can’t stay in this situation. You can’t stay just being frustrated because you haven’t got the decision-making or the decision. So, I think you’re either going to have to leave this business or you’re have to buy this business, or something, because right now, it’s not working for you.”

It was a hard process for him because he had to kind of, first of all, have a think about, “What is my identity? Am I an employee? Am I a business owner?” He had a young family. He was not financially kind of independent, so he had a mortgage to pay.

And so, it took a while, it probably took, I’m going to say three- to six-month journey for him really to kind of get to the place as we worked together, for him to go, “You know what, I am actually an entrepreneur. My identity is a business owner. And I am not just a managing director, I’m a CEO and I’m a builder and actually I need to make this thing happen. Because if I don’t make this thing happen, I’m always going to regret it and wonder what could have been if I don’t do it.”

And so, he ended up going to his boss, basically, or his bosses and then their shareholders, put a deal on the table to buy out the business. And I said, as soon as he made the decision, to buy that business, even if the deal fell through, even if they didn’t want to sell, he’d already won. He’d already won the game because he’d become the kind of person that would put a deal on the table to buy out the business.

And, of course, to do that, he also had to build new relationships with investors. He had to get an entrepreneur co-founder, potentially, or co-investor to work with him and help him navigate this new world. But the point was that, by the time he was actually ready to put a deal on the table, he’d become a new version of himself.

And, of course, the conviction and commitment that was suddenly was there because after prevaricating for a few months, he’d finally gone all in. He’d finally raised the game and he was like, “Okay, let’s do this. I’m buying this business.” He put the offer in. I tell you, we had conversations over about three to six months, and he was like, “Ah, the deal is off.”

The first time it was like, the guy just said, “I’m deleting this email,” and didn’t even read it. It was like, “Okay, this is not going to happen.” But he persisted, he went through other channels. Finally, there was a conversation. He was like, “No, no, we’re not selling the business.” He went again. Finally, it was like, “Well, we might sell the business, but not at this price.”

Went for it again, and finally, it’s going to be signed. And then he rang me up, “No, the deal is completely off. It’s all fallen through.” And then finally, “Actually, it all happened,” and he actually bought the business. And now he’s scaling it. And so, for me, it’s just an example because of what happened wasn’t just… it wasn’t just he needed a better strategy. He didn’t just need a better plan. He needed to become the kind of person who would do that.

And that’s like the 10X reckoning, but that’s the moment when you’re like, “Am I going to just play it safe, keep doing it?” He could have kept doing his current business. He’d still be managing director of a growing tech business with a good span of control. He could have stayed there, but he would have been impressed. But he just knew that for him that was settling and not going for it to see how far he could go. So, that’s just one example that comes to mind.

Pete Mockaitis
So, becoming the person, let’s zoom in to, “Why do we not become that person?” and “What is to be done in order to make the transformation?”

Richard Medcalf
There’s various answers to that and it depends on where we’re starting from. Actually, in the book, you’ll see there’s different chapters have just different starting points in terms of what’s the question you’re asking yourself.

So, “I’m successful. Am I done?” or, “Free me from this golden prison. I’m stuck in my golden prison,” or, “10X will be too much sacrifice,” or, “Do I have what it takes?” or, “Is this vision just too big?” or, “Perhaps it’s, am I the only one who cares?” There are some others, but my point is all these are slightly different thoughts that we have that make it feel hard for us to really go for that next level.

So, what I say is we have a default future. Our default future is generally pretty good. And this applies again at any level, whether you’re a CEO or a founder or whether you’re mid-level in a company, you’ve got your default future. You know, 80% probable. You kind of got your life mapped out a little bit. And it’s 80% probable because you basically know how to do it. You basically know how to do it, right?

So, it’s just more of the same, “I’m going to work, I’ll do this, I might get a promotion,” or, “I’m going to keep growing my business and keep working hard, and we’re going to grow it.” And some people, business leaders I work with, they can say, “Oh, I’ve got old plans. We’re going to 3X my business in the next three years.” Sounds impressive, but it’s still their default future. They’ve got the plan. They know how to do it. They’re just working the plan.

And so, often we go, “Well, that’s it. I’ve got my plan. I know how to do it. Let’s just get on with it.” And so, it then just becomes a question of working hard. And that’s fine. But the question is, “Well, do we want to stay in the box of our own making and work within those parameters?” I’ll give you an example. I’m thinking about a cleaning lady that we used to have. Well, actually, it wasn’t even cleaning lady. Let me rephrase that. It was childcare when my kids were young. Childcare.

A great woman, a wonderful person. Her daughter ended up also becoming a nanny, childcare as well. Obviously, nothing wrong with that. It’s great. Fantastic. But if the situations had been changed, if that lady had been a lawyer or something, perhaps her daughter might have become a lawyer. I’m not saying a lawyer is better or anything, but I’m saying that it’s a different box. You’re operating within a different frame of reference, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, understood. Like, your phrase, default future, that makes sense, in terms of, “Oh, okay, this is sort of what I know, what I’ve seen, what naturally follows for me to just go ahead and do.”

Richard Medcalf
Exactly. And so, what stops us from becoming the person? So, first of all, it’s a bit of a question of imagination. It’s like, “What would be my preferred future? What would be a future that would put a silly grin on my face and feels a bit embarrassing to say because it feels completely unrealistic?” Until you get to that, then why would you really bother going through the pain of an experimentation of actually trying to change?

So, the first thing is finding a preferred future which really lights the fire under you. That’s why I call it, “Ignite your life’s greatest work.” Like, “What would be your life’s greatest work, the thing that actually is exciting and important and impactful for you?” So, I might’ve mentioned it in a previous conversation we’ve had, I can’t remember.

But the reason I do what I do is because of my sister, Georgina. She was mentally, physically disabled. So, I had an Oxford education and a high-flying career and moved countries and had a family and all the rest of it, and she needed 24-hour care. And she passed away at a fairly early age. And we had the same DNA, fundamentally, but we were given very different hands in life.

She couldn’t speak, had epilepsy, she had autism, she had all sorts. She was paralyzed from the chest down when she was 20. A lot of stuff. She was inspirational, though, in terms of the magnetism that she had. She made friends. She was determined. She made things happen despite having very little. And people loved her, even though she couldn’t contribute economically or in any practical way.

And so, for me, that kind of instilled in me a conviction that if the world’s most capable leaders who’ve got all these opportunities don’t make the world a better place and don’t really play full out, who will? And I include myself in that. I’m like, “Well, you know, I had all these opportunities and responsibilities. So, am I just going to use my skills to help some company increase their business performance by 2% or help somebody get a promotion?”

Nothing wrong with those things. It wasn’t the story I wanted to tell my grandchildren in the future. I wanted to say, “You know what, I worked with this leader, and look at the impact they had,” or, “I worked with this person, and look at the ripple effect they had.” So, the reason I talk about this is this is my life’s greatest work, right? This is what I’m here for, is to take high-achieving leaders and help light a fire under them so they can see bigger, dream bigger and make moves they need to become the person they need to be to create their next 10X.

So, that’s what I want to say. First thing is, like, you can’t go for it until you’ve got a real reason to go for it.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I really love that notion of a preferred future that would put a silly grin on your face, because I think that just really captures the visceral, deep down, force, umph, internal motivation, drive, where magic happens, and also highlights a place where we might be very quick to say, “Oh, no, no, no, no, no, that’s silly. That’s not practical. I shouldn’t worry about all that. I shouldn’t deal with all that.”

But when you put it that way, it’s cool. And the 10x reckoning, I’m imagining, for many, this would involve just radical departures from what they’re doing. It’s like, “You know what, I’m actually not going to make my business 10 times in revenue. I’m going to go be a pastry chef because that puts a silly grin on my face.” And so, I guess what we’re 10xing is joy or passion or…

Richard Medcalf
Well, actually, for me, the word is actually contribution. So in the book, I talk about how you play a different game. Probably haven’t got time to go into it all now, but very often we end up playing scarcity games, whereas we need to play kind of different sort of game. And the way to build that, one the elements in it is your impact KPI.

So, very many people in this business, especially business leaders, like when you say, “Well, what’s your 10X goal?” They go, “Oh, add a zero to my revenues.” Now there’s nothing wrong with that because you could make a lot of big things happen when you do that. Fine. But finance is the fuel. It’s never the destination.

So, the question is, “Well, what impact do you want to make in the world if you added a zero to your revenue?” So, yeah, sure, you can have a bigger house and a bigger car, but at some point, that’s not people’s drivers. And if it is, it’s never going to make them happy anyway because they’ve already got enough, right? So, at some point, to some degree.

But the real driver is like, “What’s the impact you want to make in the world? What do you want a 10X or 100X in terms of impact?” So, if you’re being a pastry chef, it might be, “I just want to create amazing food. I want a 10x number of amazing meals that people have because of what I do.” It could be that, right?

I mean, if you’re an artist, it could be, “I just want to create the most beautiful pieces of art that bring 10x more joy to people in their lives.” But I find that, if you end up saying, “Oh, I just want to relax on a beach or whatever,” it means you’re playing the wrong game. If you end up with a kind of like, “I just want to 10X my freedom,” again, it’s like, “Well, is it freedom from, like freedom from having to do the grind?” I totally understand.

But let’s say you’ve got the freedom, now what do you want to do with it? And at a certain point, you’d have done all the cruises and traveled the world. Fine. And what do you want to 10X? And so, the impact KPI is a way of saying, “If you could just have one metric about the impact you want to make in the world.”

So, for me, it’d be something like leaders who have dramatically scaled their impact, right? Leaders who have 10x their impact. That’s what I want to measure. And, obviously, along the way, if I help enough leaders do that, the revenue and the finances, that’s going to come along. The danger is we try to pursue an ego goal, which is just like, “I supposed it’d be good if, I’m a vice president, I want to be a senior vice president,” or, “I’ve got a business that’s 100 million. I want to make it a billion.”

I mean, it’s like, we just add a number on, because we can’t think of anything else to do. Whereas, actually, when we think about impact, what’s going to light our soul up, then we start to resonate.

Pete Mockaitis

So, lay it on us, let’s hear a few folks who have had their 10x reckoning and what was the metric they selected?

Richard Medcalf

I’ll start with a fairly random one actually. So, one client literally has an enterprise catering business. And, actually, when I first worked with him, he was kind of thinking of just wanting to sell and get out of it. But actually, I helped him realize that his business actually did deliver on a great purpose, and perhaps he should connect to that.

And, actually, he realized that the purpose of that business, at least, was just to create delighted customers. It sounds really basic, right? But he said, “But this is different. It’s not just how many meals have we shipped or people have we served. It’s, like, how many people have we actually delighted?” That was really important for him.

And so, suddenly, it’s like, “Well, are we even measuring that? Do we even know how many moments of delight we’re creating? Or do we just know how many meals we’ve shipped?” It’s a very different focus. Now, one of my clients runs a tech recycling business, fundamentally, so, for him, it’s, like, literally, how many amount of landfill that’s reduced? And my client in another business, climate-related, is around carbon emissions reduced.

So, sometimes it can be these kinds of goals. So often it’s probably around the people that you’re serving or the impact that you’re making in the lives of those people. So, again, it could be, like businesses that we have turned around, or livelihoods that we have supported.

Some business owners, that’s really what they care about, they say, “Well, what I love is I’m just able to support a thousand people’s families, you know? And that’s amazing.” And for him, that can be their KPI, just to look and say, “Look, I’ve created all this employment in my local area.”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I really loved what you said there, it’s like, “Are we even measuring that delighted customers?” And I can relate to that because I can look at my downloads, and I can look at my email subscribers, and I can look at my episode retention. Like, I have a lot of numbers available, and the thing that gets me fired up is, indeed, the transformation. Like, I want to hear the stories.

And so, when we had our thousandth episode celebration, that was really fun because, “Hey, everyone, tell me how the show has been transformational for you.” And hearing those stories was so cool. And, you’re right, it’s that, “Are we even measuring that?” And it’s not the easy thing to measure because there’s nothing inside YouTube Studio or Spotify here that says, “Oh, and here’s how many people were transformed by that content, by the way.”

Richard Medcalf
And that’s why people focus so much on financial goals, because it’s like dead obvious. You just look at your bank account and you can see the number. But at some point, that’s not the right number anymore. It’s a number to keep track on, but it’s not the number one thing you need to be focusing on.

And so, for you, it could be something like, you say, “Well, I want to make people awesome at their job.” Well, you could say, “Well, how many people have got a promotion that they attribute something that we’ve worked on together to that?”

Comes to mind, it could be one idea. But the question is, “what are the stories you want to tell your grandchildren or your great grandchildren in years to come? What puts a silly grin on your face?” And you might say, “Well, hey, you what, I’ve got these many million downloads. That’s okay. That’s pretty cool.”

But you might say, “You know what, I helped 10,000 people actually get a promotion, or something.” And that might put a silly grin on your face. So, I think kind of toying around with this is kind of interesting because, and I do this, I often work with executive teams as well, and I find that, often, they have too many numbers. They have too complex goals.

So, I actually have a way of boiling a goal down into five key things, which kind of come together. It’s not five separate goals. It’s like one goal with five dimensions. But when you have that, then suddenly it’s like this one thing to hit. Whereas, most teams have like, as you said, like, “Well, we’ve got our downloads. We’ve got our email subscribers to check. We’ve got our revenue, profit goals. We’ve got our retention. We’ve got all these different things.” And everyone’s got slightly different combination of KPIs they’re looking at.

But when you’re trying to optimize all that, you almost have no flexibility left to really go 10x. Whereas, you, Pete, might say, “Well, it’s actually my goal was to help, it was the 10x number of promotions that I help people achieve.” If that was your goal, you might say, “You know what, I need to ditch the podcast because I can see there’s a better way to get to that goal.”

Or, “Actually I don’t even care about the downloads because I don’t care. Like, it could be a 10th of the people listen to it, but they’re exactly the people that I need, exactly the right people who are going to take action.” So, the point is when we start to get really clear about what we really want, then we can let go of the other metrics, which are kind of become informative, but not determinative, if that’s a word.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. That’s good. Richard, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention, any top dos or don’ts, before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Richard Medcalf
Don’t think that your next 10x is going to come from a better strategy. Now I’m a strategist, I was a partner in a strategy consulting company, I’ve done strategy for years. I love thinking strategically.

And there is a strategic component, but that only gets you half the way. The other half is that, Pete, what we’ve been talking about, the personal transformation component. Because if you just do the strategy, you’re still going to be basically operating within the box of your comfort zone, the box that your current self allows you to work within.

So, strategy is great, but it has to be paired with becoming the leader who could actually achieve a 10x future. So, that’s what I would say is like don’t just say, “I need a better plan.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, Richard, now can you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, actually, my favorite quote is from the Desert Fathers, the early Christian monks, and it’s a little story. But basically, one monk goes to the Abbot and says, “You know, Abbot, I’ve been praying, I’ve been reading my Bible, I’ve been doing my spiritual disciplines, but what more should I do? What more should I do?”

And the Abbot turns to him and he raises up his hands, and fire came out of his fingers or something, and he says, “Why not become fire?” And that quote “Why not become fire?” is really inspiring to me because we can do all this stuff and have our ideas and our plans and, yeah, thinking about things. But then why not become fire? Oh, that makes me go, “Yeah, am I really on fire for this? Or is it just in my head?”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Richard Medcalf
Well, actually, the one that’s come up right now is, I think it was, TIME mentioned it a couple of days ago, this one around ChatGPT impacting intellectual ability or ability to study. There was a study done where some people used AI to do a project, and others didn’t. And then they got independent markers. And actually, really interestingly, the people who didn’t do it, got way better scores because there was a soul in it than the people who did use AI.

And then they swapped them around, and they said, “Okay, you now need to rewrite this paper, but those of you who didn’t use AI, you now get to use it as well. And those who did, no, you mustn’t use it for the second paper.” And they found that the people who had used AI the first time could barely remember half of what they’d actually done. And those who hadn’t used it, were then able to kind of perhaps enhance their work and used that to improve further.

So, it’s just an interesting kind of beginning of a thing, but I think, in this world where we’re going through a big… it’s a huge shift, obviously, in everybody’s world. I’m actually running an event in October called “The AI Reckoning,” where I’m bringing a bunch of founders and CEOs to actually wrestle through what it means for business, but also what it means for leadership, because it’s going to make a big difference.

But I think in this world, we have to really make sure that we don’t get AI to do our press-ups for us or sit-ups for us, because that’s actually doing the hard work, the cognitive work, but that’s actually for us. It’s not just about the outputs.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, I was thinking about that with all the Tesla Optimus robot can complete your workout for you, faster, more weight, more reps, more sets, with less rest time. Yeah, have at it.

Richard Medcalf
Yeah, so that’s the mind.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool?

Richard Medcalf

My favorite tool right now is an app called STREAKS. So, STREAKS is simply is a habit-building tool. It allows you to have very simple, on the iPhone, like a few tiles, hit it every day. It reminds you when you are kind of at risk of missing it. I find that’s been really helpful. I’m not, fundamentally, super, super disciplined. And so, a little bit of help to help me actually do the daily work needed to make the big goals happen is really valuable.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And is there a key nugget that you are known for and is quoted back to you often, a Richard sound bite?

Richard Medcalf
Of course, you’ve just primed my brain by saying the one you already said to me, right, which is the most important project is the one no one is asking for. That’s definitely one that comes up a lot.

Pete Mockaitis

Perfect.

Richard Medcalf

Just leave it there.

Pete Mockaitis
And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Richard Medcalf
So, a lot of places. So, first of all, find me on LinkedIn, where you’ll also discover, as well as random photos of me with Richard Branson, probably not many of those these days. But you might find it funny. I’ve just launched a new little video series called The Richard Metaverse, which is me delivering this content around “The 10x Reckoning,” interspersed with some alter egos from different parts of the alternative realities of the multiverse.

So, LinkedIn is the place for that. And XQuadrant.com is my website. That’s an X, and then the word quadrant. That’s probably the best place to find out everything that I’m up to.

But what I’m going to suggest is, if you’re interested in getting the book, you can grab the paperback or whatever from Amazon if you want, The 10X Reckoning. Or, if you go to XQuadrant.com/awesomeatyourjob, I would actually put a link there to download it for free if you want the digital version. At least for the next couple of months, I’ll make that available.

So, it’s a punchy 75-page read. It doesn’t take very long because I’ve written it for people who are busy and have got other things to do in life, right, have got to get on with things, but, hopefully, it’s a high value per time invested, which is my goal to really shift how you think about your future. So, that’s XQuadrant.com/awesomeatyourjob.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Richard Medcalf
Don’t optimize the wrong thing. We can spend years optimizing in the current box that we’re in and just living out our default future. So, what I really want to suggest is get clear on your preferred future.

And if you don’t actually know how to do that, people can help on that, but get clear about the thing that is going to put a silly green on your face, and start to optimize for that. Don’t feel you’ve got to wait until you’ve got to a certain position, a certain age, a certain income level, because all those things are just delaying tactics. So, find your North Star.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Richard, thank you.

Richard Medcalf
Thanks, Pete.

1068: Finding the Courage to Say What Needs to be Said with Molly Tschang

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Molly Tschang shares how to turn difficult conversations into opportunities to build connections and relationships.

You’ll Learn

  1. The preamble that helps your feedback land well
  2. How to say no while still being a team player
  3. What to do when you disagree with the majority

About Molly

Molly Tschang, founder of Abella Consulting and Say It Skillfully® Inc., empowers senior management teams to Win as One. With expertise in over 80 mergers and acquisitions, she has guided executives through the intricate human dynamics of transformational change and growth. Molly helps leaders cultivate mutual commitment, enabling them to excel in complex, high-stakes environments. Through Say It Skillfully, she equips individuals at all levels with the skills to communicate effectively and authentically. Her mission: to empower everyone to be seen, heard, and understood—especially when tackling their most critical challenges.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Plaud.ai. Use the code AWESOME and get a discount on your order

Molly Tschang Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Molly, welcome!

Molly Tschang
Great to be with you, Pete.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m so excited to hear your insights about how we can Say It Skillfully. Could you kick us off with what are the most fascinating discoveries you’ve made about us and humans communicating over your years of coaching and teaching on this stuff?

Molly Tschang
I think, number one, is how much communication starts within. It’s so easy to say, “Pete doesn’t get it. They don’t want to hear it.” And when I realized this, this is so much of it is about our relationship with our own self and really be grounded within.

And it seems like sort of namby-pamby perhaps, but I have been with some of the most extraordinary communicators, and their ability to really be in service to others is because they really feel solid in themselves, and they’re not kind of worried about themselves. So, I think that’s really been first and foremost.

Pete Mockaitis
So, they’re solid in themselves and they’re not worried about themselves. What are the typical worries, concerns, hang ups that get in most people’s way here?

Molly Tschang
Yeah, the fears are real. And I want to caveat that I’m not about unicorns and rainbows, Pete. So, if you really are in an environment where it’s been shown that people don’t want to hear other people’s points of views, bad things really happen to you, Molly is not saying, “Skillfulness is really on your radar at all.” That would be a waste of time.

And my bigger question is, “Why are you there?” because I would really hope that you would be in a work environment where you could spread your wings and fly. So, first and foremost, we’re talking about places where people really do want to hear from people. They really want to get a sense of an accurate truth.

And the fears are real, and I say they’re threefold. One is just that fear of being wrong. And, of course, making mistakes is how we succeed. Like, conceptually, we all know that, but you go to school and you’re trying to get an A. And you don’t get an A by getting wrong answers. So, it’s been beat into us to get the right answer.

I’ve even heard senior people say to people on their team, “You need to be the smartest person in the room,” right? And when you’re in a room where everyone’s jockeying for a position like that, it’s intimidating. And so, if there’s a chance that you really may not be right, you’re inclined to be like, “Well, I better not say anything,” right? So that fear of being wrong.

The fear of not fitting in, which really gets to being perceived as not a team player. Let’s say everyone’s going one direction, you have a different point of view, but you’re a little bit hesitant to put it out because you don’t want to be like, “Eh, I don’t want to be like, I’m not, you know, all for the team,” and so we hold back, and that’s very real.

And the third one is, particularly, when we’re giving, I would say, constructive feedback that someone needs to hear. It’s this notion of, “I don’t want to offend them. I don’t want to offend Molly because she’s going to feel bad about herself.” And so, again, I would say that that’s about, “Hey, what’s your relationship about giving feedback to someone?” because that helps them to grow. That helps them to be a better person.

And so, that ability to have a mental shift on “Why are you speaking in the first place?” and to get whole with that, I really think can change the whole game for lots of folks.

Pete Mockaitis
And if we have these fears, what should we do?

Molly Tschang
Well, I think, first of all, it’s just really assessing, “Is it really there?” So, I hear this a lot, “Well, so and so doesn’t want to hear it.” I’m like, “Okay. So, if you have something that you see that the person is doing that maybe isn’t serving the team, right, and you don’t say something, how are they ever going to know?”

And so, what happens is people really are able to peel it back. Now, again, if someone has really shown they don’t want to hear it, again, I’m not saying stick your neck out, but I think a lot of folks will be like, “Well, wait a second.” And I say this, I mean, does your boss get out of bed, fly out of bed going, “I’m going to make it so scary no one tells me what I need to hear”? No, that’s not the output they do.

And so, I think if you take a little bit of lightness with it, people realize, “Hey, maybe there’s a little bit more fear in my own self.” So, I think it’s really determining if it’s valid or not. And I think the other thing to do is, “What is my intention?” Now, if you’re trying to speak up to make Molly look so amazing, like everyone else put down, okay, I would argue, I’m not sure about that intention.

If you’re there saying, “I want to say something because I think it’s going to help the team think more critically about this problem. I think if I say something, it’ll help people understand the customer’s experience,” then you’re really there serving the whole. And so, that intention, by the way, when you come across as really wanting to help others, that generally goes really well.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Well, it’s funny, that phrase, “They don’t want to hear it,” it’s like there’s layers of truth to that. And I’m thinking about a tale of two landlords. One, I’m thinking about like, so if you own a building and you got tenants, and then there’s a problem.

On one sense, we don’t want to hear it because it’s like, “Oh, no, this means money and difficulty in hunting down a contractor or a handyman, someone to repair this thing. And this is a hassle, a headache, a thing I wish I didn’t have to deal with.” So, on the one sense, we don’t want to hear it.

But I’m thinking about my friend, Lisa, who had some tenants just completely ignore, like, a really nasty rat situation. It was in the corner of the basement they weren’t in all that often, it’s like, “Yeah, whatever, you know, it’s kind of a pain, but, you know, I don’t want to annoy Lisa. I don’t want to put her out,” and so they just didn’t tell her for years.

And it just, as you can imagine, multiplied into an epic horrifying problem. So, it’s like, that phrase, “They don’t want to hear it,” it’s really good to examine that in some detail because, on the one hand, it’s probably true. They would prefer they live a life, a day without this big unexpected problem plopping on their lap, and them having to now contend with it.

So, on the one hand, yes, they don’t want to hear it. But, on the other hand, it is so much better to address a couple rats than dozens after years of neglect.

Molly Tschang
Yeah, 100% on that. And I think that gets down to what is our intention in sharing and how do we say it. And so, “This might be tough to hear, but I’m saying it because, if I were in your shoes, I would really want to know. I’m saying this because I think this will help. We’ll put something out there that is addressable now that if I wait a little longer, I think it only gets worse. So, I appreciate you being open to this because I really think it’s going to help us, the team, you.”

And so, again, it’s thinking about “What is worrying me about saying it?” and getting whole with that. I don’t want to make people bad or wrong for having fears or worrying, but think about that and then take the high road, like, “What is my intention? Why am I saying something? And it’s to contribute and it’s to be helpful.”

And so, I think this is like, “Ah, this is sort of really disgusting, but I have to tell you. I think it’s better to know now.” So, you can kind of grease the skits for how someone receives something by the way you offer it up. That takes a little bit of planning, Pete, right? So, you can’t just be like blurting stuff randomly.

And that idea of really, as a little bit of structure, which is the framework that we teach in our book here, is just, “Hey, what’s going on for me? The me side, getting hold of myself, getting out of my own way, knowing what do I want to have happen? And knowing that that’s what I want to have happen, how do I show up? What’s my energy? Is it with heart? Is it with anger? How do I show up to set the stage?”

And then that you is, what’s it like for the other person, which is like, “Ugh, no one wants to hear they have to spend more money.” However, they’d much rather spend less money now than more money later. And at the top level, the we, who are we together, here we are in this relationship and we want to have a really open, communicative, transparent relationship where we’re trying to help each other.

And they don’t really want you to live with rats, frankly, and you don’t really want them to have a major rat problem, ideally.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, certainly. Okay. Well, could you maybe share with us some beautiful, illustrative conversation examples from your work, either your own conversations or conversations you’ve helped sort of navigate, mediate, that bring some of this stuff to life?

Molly Tschang
Just yesterday, I was talking to someone who has been at our company a long time. They have a new manager. The manager has been promoted to a more senior level and the relationship with this person had been fabulous because they were not micromanaging and diving in when maybe they shouldn’t be now because they’re more senior.

And so, that idea of, “How do I give this senior person constructive feedback without risking my head being chopped off or them freaking out or being even more anxious than it’s already obvious to you that they are?”

And so, because this person happened to have a pretty good relationship, I mean, I said to this person, “You are not at risk of being fired, and you should know that you’re trying to really help this individual be the best leader they can be. And if they don’t know that what they’re doing demoralizes the team, the team feels dismissive,” they had a specific example of how something was said that the manager thought, “Oh, this is so fabulous.” And then her point of view was, “No, that was not fabulous.”

So, getting hold of that situation, and then it’s saying, “Hey, I want to this person aside,” saying, “Amy, we’ve worked a long time. I have a ton of respect for you and I’m really glad you got promoted. I want you to be able to look great for everybody. And in our last meeting, I’m wondering how you thought that went.” And so, you start to get an engagement of how the person, their reality of the situation.

So often we get into it and you want to blur it out, “This is what you need to do,” right, because you’re so worried about saying it, but that ability to kind of on-ramp with someone, create a conversation, and then kind of say that’s how that landed for you, “I can see what you were trying to do when you said that, but I want to share something because I think it may be a blind spot for you. We all have blind spots, Amy. And I think this could really help you be even more effective.”

And then you share that, and you go back and forth. It’s not a “My way or the highway.” Again, it is your reality. And I have this notion of shared reality. We want to get to an accurate shared reality. And Amy is only going to be able to lead to her full potential if she kind of appreciates, even though she might have meant something, it landed differently.

And so, I think the biggest part for any individual is just that courage. Because it does take courage. It is far easier to say, “She doesn’t want to hear it. It’s not going to go well. I’m not going to say anything.” And the thing is, if you do that, which is totally your right to do, you’re contributing to the problem. You’re not a bad person, but you are perpetuating the disconnects.

And that is what I’ve seen, Pete, I call them your A and B players, they’re like, “Wait a second. I didn’t work my butt off, whether it was community college or Harvard or Cambridge, to be beige or a wallflower. I want to be able to contribute.” And so, that’s the energy. You have to come with that. And if you are coming across in a way to be helpful, genuinely to be helpful, the person may not want to hear it – but you know what – they’re going to respect that, and deep down, they’re going to be grateful.

I have just seen this time and time and time again, because, even at the most senior levels, we’re all human. And, by the way, we all do stuff that we think is going well and it’s not landing that way. It doesn’t make us bad leaders. It means that people are different. We all respond differently. So, I mean, I think that one working, managing up, if you will, giving feedback up is a big one.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, we talked about the fear and the courage and the “They don’t want to hear it,” I mean, there is a segment of, you mentioned sometimes these fears are completely justified in terms of retribution or whatever. They will not receive it even if you say it as skillfully as Molly herself.

So, could you help us? If we’re gauging, doing like a risk assessment, what might be some indicators that this really is a danger zone to say this versus, “No, no, we’re just getting in our heads. We’re, like, we have nothing to fear, but the fear itself. Summon the courage and you’ll be glad you did”?

Molly Tschang
I think people are pretty apparent about that. And so, “Hey, I’ve noticed how that meeting went. How do you think the meeting went?” You just open up with an open-ended question, “You know, I’m really working on improvement. What are some areas you think I could be improving? Hey, I’m going to flip it a little. Where are some areas that you could be improving?”

You can see if someone’s going to go with you on that, or if they’re like, you know, stiff arm, like, “What are you talking about?”

Pete Mockaitis
“I discuss these matters with my coach, not my subordinates. Thank you very much.” “Oh, dang.”

Molly Tschang
Exactly. That’s like a clear indicator. Okay. That’s like get out the resume, freshen up the resume and let’s go, right? I do understand that it’s a big disconnect. It can be very hard to look for new roles. I really want people to value themselves, Pete, because you have to decide that you’re finding a place that deserves you.

I know so many people, super hard working. I mean, you’re going to go all out and you got to find a place that values you, and that’s on you. It’s not someone else’s job. And it’s a very personal decision. And I get, sometimes, things aren’t exactly perfect. That’s fine. You decide for whatever reason that’s the right situation for you at that moment. Totally respect that.

I don’t want to give people both sides. You can’t complain about it and not be willing to do something about it. That’s where I have to call a spade a spade.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, and I’m sure it varies quite a bit by industry and situation and dah, dah. dah. But if I could put you on the spot to very roughly hazard an estimated guess of what percent of people can handle getting some feedback versus what percent, I will say managers and up, versus what percent are just not worth it?

Molly Tschang
Yeah. So, this would be only Molly’s very limited experience. I have no data on this, but my very limited experience is, I think, there’s probably 15, 10, 15%, they’re not bad people. They cannot kind of get out of their own way, in certain situations, right? In certain situations. And in those cases, it’s far better to be at peace with that and figure out “How do we work it so that we can mitigate this?”

Seventy-nine percent of relationship issues, if you will, are perpetual. We don’t solve them. They are there. So, it’s, “How do we manage around those?” The more we have transparency about a tendency, let’s just say, as a leader, I have a tendency to jump the gun, shiny new object, right? And I know that. So, if I’m transparent, “Team, I know that I can be attracted by the shiny new object, and that can feel like I’m deprioritizing these other things.”

“I’m being open about this and I’m giving you full authority when I’m doing that, to do a Heisman, or whatever you need to do so that I can wake up and appreciate that I’m kind of going off a little bit.” So, I think the leaders who do that, I mean, are empowering their teams to be part of the solution, are owning, showing vulnerability in a good way because we all have stuff, right?

Pete, no one’s perfect here. We all have stuff. No one, for the leaders are out there, you’re the leader for a reason. People respect that. I think something has come up recently, where sometimes in decision-making, a leader wants to seem very inclusive, which is fantastic. However, if the decision has been made and, in your mind, you’re just going to do X, and by the way, you’re the leader, so it’s your prerogative to make the decision. Just let the team know.

“I took some feedback,” or, “I didn’t take feedback,” or, “It was a short amount of time. I’ve made this decision.” What people don’t want is to go into a meeting, you’re pretending to take all this input when you’ve already made up your mind, right? So, these are the things where I’d say, from a transparency standpoint, the leader knowing, “Okay, where am I on this? Hey, I’ve decided this is the call.” Awesome. Tell people.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so you’ve got these specific scenarios where the fears pop up, and it could benefit a lot to say it skillfully. So, we talked a bit about giving that feedback. How about some additional magical words, phrases, scripts, pro tips for these other scenarios, like speaking up when you disagree, confronting a bully, sharing bad news or a mistake, setting boundaries, saying no? Give us some of your top scenarios and favorite ways to say it.

Molly Tschang
Well, I think the saying no when people are like, because the people who are the highest performers, right, they’re always getting more stuff because they get it done. And so, this is where I would say to people, you’re enabling people to give you the work at 5:00 o’clock and it’s due at 9:00 a.m. or what have you. And so, you have to draw the line.

And part of that is, “Oh, I said you’re being a great teammate and you are helping them to be more planful. You’re helping them to be a teammate.” And so, this is where lightness, I would say, I would offer folks, “Oh, my gosh, Pete, I love working with you. You’re so great. You’re driving me out of my mind. Okay? And so, I’m going to tell you right now, I’m not doing it.”

“I said, Pete, I’m not doing it. For the last 20 times you’ve come to me, I’ve done this and I can’t do these 11th-hour ditches, so I’m going to tell you no. And here’s why. Because I have these other priorities, people came to me, I’m accountable for this. I know you can appreciate that. Once in a blue moon, I’m happy to jump through hoops for you, but it can’t be a habit.” Right?

This being open-hearted about it and how it serves the whole, not, “I’m right and you’re wrong.” But, “I understand what situation you’re in. I’m explaining my situation so you get it, and I’m doing the best I can for what I believe serves the organization.” And that’s defensible. Again, people might not like it, but we don’t want to enable people to be going with behaviors that don’t serve them.

The same thing, I think, goes with boundaries. It’s just being clear, “Oh, Pete, but I don’t want to be a witch.” I said, “No one said you had to be a witch.” I said, “Hey, team, this is the deal.” Whatever you might have at whatever time, “I want people to understand, I am a thousand percent in.” Maybe you’re available later in the day or what have you, but you explain to people how you’re going to get your work done and you just let them know, “I will get it done. I need this amount of time because of…” whatever reason. And people will honor that.

I think people feel bad about asking for what they need. But I think if you’re delivering and you’re adding value to the team, you’ve earned the right to say, “Hey, I want to continue to perform at a very high level. And this is what it takes for me to perform at a high level.” For some folks who aren’t maybe getting as much feedback as they might like from their managers, and managers are busy. They’re running around. They’ve got stuff and they’re not trying not to. They maybe just haven’t had the time to think about it.

“Raymond, I would really appreciate a chance to sit down with you every month to get a quick rundown of what you think is going well and where I can improve. And the reason this is important is I’m going to feel more motivated because I’m getting specific input. And I feel like I’m going to be able to do a better job for you and for the team.”

Go in with a positive intent. It’s easy, “Well, they don’t value me. They don’t trust me.” Maybe they don’t, but that’s not going to set you up for success if you start that way. Show the positive intention that you would like someone to give you and reflect that back to them.

And then, I think, sometimes we get into the solving mode, and I understand this. “Get in. The project is late. What are we going to do?” That ability to acknowledge where the other person is, to be human. Let’s say someone you’re working with shows up and they’re just not quite themselves. You’re a little uncomfortable, frankly, with that emotion so you just want to jump to the work even faster.

But I would offer, “You know, Sandy, before we get into the project, you don’t quite seem like yourself. Is everything okay?” That’s it. That shows caring. Now people say, “I don’t want to pry.” I’m not asking you to pry. Sandy may say, “Oh, I appreciate that,” or, “No, I’m fine. I just didn’t get a lot of sleep,” or what have you.

But that moment is for you to connect because effective communication starts when you actually connect with the other human being. So don’t feel that that’s a waste of time. That’s helping someone feel they’re seen, they can feel heard. I think for some folks who tend to want to solve a lot, the last thing I’ll say is this, my favorite is say more, right?

We have two ears. We have one mouth. Then give the other person a chance to fully share what’s going on for them without you feeling like, “I have to construct some brilliant response,” but rather just hear it for what it is.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, you know, it’s funny when you talk about just acknowledging that there’s a human and their emotions and what’s up, I recently had a conversation where someone said, “Oh, how are you doing?” I said, “Oh, hanging in there.” And he said, “Yes, so what does that mean because…” and he figured it out. Like, that’s my code phrase for “I’m not doing great, but I don’t feel like really getting into it so I’m going to say I’m hanging in there,” which is accurate. Whereas, to say fine is to lie.

Now you could say, “Well, hey, it’s a social norm, so it doesn’t count as a lie.” So, okay, that’s another conversation. But so that’s my little personal code but he saw right through it, he’s like, “Wait, but so, like, what does that mean?” And I thought that was so good because we were able to talk about the things, and it was very helpful.

Molly Tschang
That’s good. That’s really good.

Pete Mockaitis
Because you’re right, it’s delicate because you don’t want to pry, but you really do care and you really are conveying, “No, seriously, I’m offering you the permission to tell me what’s actually happening in your life, in your current mood, state, vibe. There’s an open floor invitation for that conversation right now, even though you might not be accustomed to that in many work contexts.” So, yeah, you don’t want to put them on the spot, but you do care. What do you recommend?

Molly Tschang
So, I think this is realizing that we can be skillful and show that we care and do everything that we can. And that’s what we can do. We can’t make the person feel comfortable sharing something. Some people, they’ve never shared at work. And I understand, I have done workshops with people, and I had one person say, “I’ve been at this company 17 years. I have never had a conversation like this.”

The ability to be real and to share who you are and what’s going on, particularly your struggles, that’s not the norm. I think, to the extent that you can create that space where people can show up, not to bog down work with all the personal problems. That is not the point, but that people appreciate that we’re not pretending you’re some perfect robot that just marches along and everything is, like, fine.

So, I think the individual may say, “Well, you know, I’m fine.” “Okay. Well, I just want to make sure. I care about you. And I just want you to know, if there’s any time that I can be helpful to talk about something off the record, I’m here for you.” That’s it. That’s it. You’re extending an opening and an olive branch, sharing that you care. You’re showing that you care.

And I can assure you that, even if they don’t respond to it, deep down, that lands well, right, because we’re human beings, at the end of the day. We’re not project manager or tech lead to, right? There’s a human being with a lot of life experiences.

And I think one of the things that, I think the social media is not so great for that, but, you know, we learn the most from the things we mess up and the struggles and stuff that’s hard. And it’s not really necessarily fun to share. You don’t want me to brag about how weak I was or how I screwed something up but I think creating space for people on that front is really important.

In fact, there’s one situation where this person talked about this conversation. It turns out this person, essentially, cannot see out of one eye, but had never shared this disability with people because he just didn’t feel comfortable doing that. And, of course, we’re in awe of him to be able to function the way he did.

So, I want folks to own your own sense of courage, and that when you share and are open of yourself, that’s an invitation to let other people know that they can do the same. And you have the saying, “I can see you because I’ve gotten to know you.” And to get to know someone, it’s about hearing their story and being open to hearing it without judgment.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, now let’s hear about the scenario in which there’s a group meeting situation, folks generally seem like, “Okay, yeah, yeah, this is the thing we’re going to do.” You think it’s a terrible idea. You’ve got the minority opinion of disagreement. Any pro tips on going there?

Molly Tschang
This is where you have to get deep down and say, “You know, I’m saying this not because I want to be right and make everyone wrong. I’m saying it’s because I think that there’s an angle here that we would want to explore. And I think weighing in that way can help. So, I am observing,” so you’re noticing, “I’m noticing everybody’s on the same page with this, which is great for you, folks. I have to share that I do see it a little differently or a lot differently.”

But what you’re not saying is, “You guys are all wrong and I’m super right.” Okay, that’s not the insertion. “I see it differently. I’d like to share this to spur the discussion. And I’m sharing it because, obviously, I want us to get to the best answer for us, for the customer, for whatever, so,” and then you share it.

I think, lots of times, people feel like they’re trying to one up, they’re trying to like go through all the details that you may not know. Realize you’re only seeing it from your angle and you can share, “I’m in customer service. I know all you folks are in engineering and in marketing. I see perhaps something different and I want to give you the benefit of what I see because I think it could inform the best decision.”

It takes being grounded in myself to be able to offer that in a way with that language. So, that’s where I would say getting clear on, “Hey, why am I here? I’m not here to make everybody else look stupid and I’m the smartest one in the room. That’s not why I’m here. I’m here because I do legitimately see something different.”

And it can also be, “You know, I’m really tracking that everyone is seeing this the same way. I’m missing a few pieces. Could you help me understand X?” Rather than say, “It’s not going to work when you do it that way. When this happens, help me understand how that’s going to move.” You’re being curious without judging, without expecting an answer.

So, I think that just giving folks different ways to insert so that you’re best serving the whole. That’s my main message here is that we’re here because we really want to help everyone get to the right state. Okay, sometimes people have to make their own mistakes. You’ve done what you can. If they’re like, “Hey, we hear you, Molly. I think that…”

And the leaders can say this, “You know, given what I know, I’m going to go with this. I might be wrong, but we’ll go with it. And if we need to change course, we will.” You’re like, “Okay, great.  You go with it.” You did what you could to the best of your ability. You sleep well at night.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. I’d also like to hear your perspective on what are some things you recommend we don’t say, like common missteps, like, “Uh-oh,” you’re better off maybe purging any key words or phrases from our vocabulary?

Molly Tschang
So, two come to mind. So, one is if you’re a more senior person, really not, it could just be anyone, but someone comes to you with bad news or tough news, something you may not be so thrilled to hear. I have heard senior people, the first thing out of their mouth when a more junior person tells them something that’s not easy to say, “Who said that?” Just like, “Did you just blurt that out in a very aggressive declarative tone to someone who was trembling because they wanted to tell you something that they thought you needed to know?”

So, I get that you might be outraged. I get that you’re trying to connect all the dots. The number one thing, when someone comes to you with stuff that might be tough, is to say, “Gosh, before I say anything, thank you. I appreciate that may not have been so easy to say. And I want everyone else who is here to know that I need you and want you to be able to come forth with things that maybe you don’t think I want to hear.”

So, the leaders who do that, you have to reinforce it every day. What happens is the leader is like, “Well, I told them that they should be able to say anything that they want.” And you said it once, you know, in January 15th of 2025. Like, it doesn’t work. It has to be reinforced and it has to be backed up with how you respond when someone gives you the bad news or something that they don’t want to hear, okay?

And that doesn’t mean you’re happy about it. I’m not trying to conflate that. Saying, “Hey, I really respect that you shared that with me. I’m going to push back a little, but I want you to continue to do that.” You can be upfront about that. I’m not saying you have to be namby-pamby about it, but you have to realize that, as a senior person, it’s just inherently scary. It just is.

Even if you are saying, “I’m not scary and I want to hear it.” From a power authority level, it’s hard for people. And appreciating that, I think, is super important. Now, I know other folks on the other side where people are so comfortable with them, they’re coming to them all the time and telling them whatever, and then they have a different problem, they’re like, “Wait a second. What do I really need to know here, right?” And so, I mean, you got both sides of that coin.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Anything else?

Molly Tschang
Well, I think there’s a lot of feedback scenarios, and this is the one I alluded to earlier that I just want people to realize, like, “Molly doesn’t get better unless people feel comfortable helping me get better.” Someone else doesn’t get better unless we help them. So, we need each other on the team to be able to grow and to get better. So that’s normal.

And I want people to feel good about the fact that someone cares enough to say, “Hey. I see what you were trying to do there. I’d like to offer something that I think could be more effective. Are you open to it?” And so, I think this back and forth in a conversation is what I want to help people think about. So often, they get in and they have this piece of feedback and it’s, I’ve seen people go four minutes.

And the poor person is like, just from a fire hose, getting all this deluge of words. They don’t really even know what you’re saying. So, that ability to just take the time, to set the stage, “I’m speaking up because I think it’s something that can be helpful. I may not be 100% right, but I want to share it for your consideration.” So, you’re giving them optionality, and then roll into why you think it could be helpful.

Now, if someone, you’re in a situation where you really think they did something that didn’t work, you have to say, “Hey, you’re the boss person. I have to say, I’m calling it like I see it. I don’t think that really worked, and here’s why.” “I could be wrong about that but this is my decision.” Or, “Since I’m the leader, I can make that call.” And that’s fair.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, tell me, Molly, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about your favorite things?

Molly Tschang
Well, there’s three things, I think, that differentiate the approach that Marshall and I took to this book we wrote. And I think the first thing is we really wanted to confront a very widespread workplace blind spot. And that is that people are, in fact, not speaking up, even in the highest performing places. They have these fears or they lack the skill.

And the disconnect is the leaders actually think they’re super accessible and the employees think otherwise. And so, the ability to bubble that up is like, “Hey, folks, that is going on.” For the leaders who are like, “Oh, my people love me.” Those are like, “No, I’m not really sure that’s going on.” So, I think just being upfront that people are not speaking up as much as they could be, that’s an opportunity for everyone.

And so, the idea of this effective communication is it is a life-changing skill. Learning how and when best to use your voice benefits your relationships, your career, and every single thing that you do. Yet, of all the things we’re trained in and all this corporate training I had for three decades, it’s not something that we learned. So, I just want to encourage folks that, because it is a very personalized, individualized skill, we come from different backgrounds, different experiences, it’s really on you to figure out what words work for you.

Certain words work for Pete. He can use them. Certain words work for Molly. But for each of us, I want to encourage you to really find what works for you because, fundamentally, your communication is how other people experience you. It is you, right? So, people are, “Well, how come she doesn’t think I’m confident?” I’m like, “Well, maybe she doesn’t think you’re confident because you’re not communicating very confidently, right?” Newsflash.

And then I think the third thing I would offer is that I think a lot of personal development, the communication space is you have a certain, like, “How do you play the game? And how do I win?” And there’s nothing wrong about figuring out how you win the game. I would offer that what we’re trying to come forth with in the Say It Skillfully way is that we’re trying to help people learn how to actually change the game, Pete, so that everyone wins.

And I think when you’re actually giving people the space to be who they are, to say what they think needs to be said, and really bubble up all the different viewpoints, you have the best shot of aligning, really, on what’s real, what’s the accurate shared reality. And from that we can do our best work together.

And I really want that. I really truly want that for everyone because I didn’t speak English until I was five. I was painfully shy. Super, super unskillful. So, it’s a hundred percent a learned skill.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, now let’s hear a bit about your favorite things. Could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Molly Tschang
Well, “To serve is to live,” Frances Hesselbein, passed at 107, says it all.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study?

Molly Tschang
I like Marcus Aurelius. So, his book of little genius wisdoms. I can’t pick one, but I think he’s amazing.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Molly Tschang
So, my friends wrote this great book on meditations, and I can’t believe I’m just spacing out. It’s by Bruce Kazanoff, and, gosh, I can’t remember the name of it. I’ll have to come back and put it up there. But it’s this tiny book of meditations.

And the reason I love it so much is the short meditations were a collaboration. And they collaborated, and they just wrote it organically, and they would send something back and forth and the whole process of that. And I did learn to meditate later in life and it has just made a huge, huge difference for me.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool, something you use to be honest about your job?

Molly Tschang
I have to just say that this little Yeti Nano microphone so that I can be heard more clearly has been a game changer.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with clients, they quote it back to you often?

Molly Tschang
“Transparency is your friend.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Molly Tschang
SayItSkillfully.com.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Molly Tschang
And one resource I want to gift to all of your subscribers, Pete, is my mini audio book The Me-You-We Framework. And this is the way to skillful conversation that anyone can apply regardless of your level, industry, job. So we’ll give the download link in the podcast, but I really encourage folks to check it out, to start your journey, and encourage others to do the same because when you say it skillfully, performance improves, and everybody wins.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Molly Tschang
Learning how and when best to use your voice is the number one thing you can do to succeed in life and, really, I think, bring you happiness. And so, I would encourage folks to check out all the resources and learn to speak up in a way that’s really true to yourself.

And it’s going to help you in working together, but I think really more importantly, for me, is it helps you with your most cherished relationships at home. And to feel like you’re living a life of no regrets because you’re able to put forth and say what you think serves the whole.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Molly, thank you.

Molly Tschang
Thank you, Pete. That was super fun.

1048: Transforming Insecurities into Strength and Action with Margie Warrell

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Margie Warrell explores how to build the courage to move beyond fear and unlock new possibilities.

You’ll Learn

  1. How to identify your insecurities and overcome them
  2. The two dimensions of courage
  3. How to take action despite your fear

About Margie

Margie Warrell is a five-time best-selling author, keynote speaker, leadership coach, and Forbes columnist. With twenty-five years of experience living and working around the world, she has dedicated her life to helping others overcome fear and unlock their potential.

From her humble beginnings on a small farm in rural Australia to her former role as a Senior Partner at Korn Ferry and Advisory Board member for the Forbes School of Business & Technology, Margie has learned that courage is essential for every worthwhile endeavor. A mother of four and an advocate for women’s empowerment, she inspires others to live bravely and refuse to settle in any aspect of life.

Resources Mentioned

Thank You, Sponsors!

Margie Warrell Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Margie, welcome!

Margie Warrell
Great to be with you.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m super excited to hear your perspectives on courage. And I want to start by hearing, what’s one of the most surprising and fascinating and counterintuitive discoveries you’ve made about courage in your career and researching this matter?

Margie Warrell
Ah, it’s probably that courage is not always about stepping bravely forward, putting yourself out there, saying a big yes and climbing out onto the far limb. Sometimes courage is saying no, sitting still, doing nothing, and reconnecting, disconnecting, pressing pause on all the doing and the bold acts of bravery, and just reconnecting with who we’re being, and being still and being unproductive. That is, sometimes, even more challenging and requires even more courage than being busily in action.

Pete Mockaitis
Intriguing. Could you share with us a story that illustrates that?

Margie Warrell
Well, look, I’ll share from my own life. So, I am someone who has a bias for action. I am someone who tends to be an Energizer bunny, sort of productive, productive, doing, doing, doing, doing. That’s almost my comfort zone is to be out there, furiously working hard, and doing a lot of things and juggling many balls. And that can be, in some ways, affirming of a sense of identity, and I’m in action.

And so, for me, over the years, is recognizing that there is actually a deep-seated fear of slowing down and doing nothing because, “Well, what if I become lazy? What if I never achieve anything again? What if this means I’m amount to nothing? What if…?” And so, just looking at where fear is pulling the strings and sometimes pushing me into the state of doing and busyness, and actually confronting that and going, “You know what, I don’t have to do more to be worthy. I don’t have to achieve more to be worthy. I am worthy.”

And, actually, right now, the most valuable thing for me to do is to just sit and pause and get really present and grounded in who I am and what I’m about rather than being in action. And then that enables me to then actually upgrade my action so that when I go back into action, I’m far more aligned, have far more clarity, much more intentional about what I’m doing. So, does that make sense?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, intriguing. And I’d love if you could share a little bit more in terms of what are the scariest things that may be lurking for us in the solitude, in the quiet, in that silence?

Margie Warrell
Well, we have to come face to face with just like who we are at the deepest place because it’s easy, busyness can be a great tool for distraction. When we’re busy, it almost can be addictive because it can be feeding us and giving us a sense of significance. And, I mean, we all want to feel significant in our lives. To be human is to want to feel significant in some way. And we can achieve that through healthy means and we can achieve it through unhealthy means.

And I think that the busyness can provide that sense of, sort of like, “Oh, you know, look at all that I’m doing.” And people are going, “Wow, aren’t you doing a lot?” And so, the confronting part of just pressing pause on that is to go, “Who am I if I’m not doing that? And what are the deepest fears that are sometimes lurking there out of immediate line of sight?”

And I think, for many of us, there’s a deep-seated fear of being unworthy, of being judged and found wanting, “You are not smart enough. You are not clever, capable, experienced, intelligent, educated, likable, lovable, leader-like enough,” insert something before the word enough. And I think it’s part of the deep work of growing into who we can become to kind of pull back the covers on those fears.

Because they’re not always obvious but they can pull invisible strings that shape how we show up, how we speak up, the presence that we give to other people, how we lead, whether or not we are in tapping into our own intuitive sense of what’s going on around us and what’s going on for the people around us so that we can speak into their listening and be someone that builds trust and others come to count on  for the integrity and the character and the courage that we bring to situations, but not always loud courage, sometimes quiet courage.

Pete Mockaitis
And when you say enough, I always wonder, enough for what?

Margie Warrell
Yeah, enough. Enough of what gives us a sense of innate worthiness.

Pete Mockaitis
Enough to have worthiness.

Margie Warrell
And so, yeah, when people say enough, that can be many things, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, enough for your life to, fundamentally, have value.

Margie Warrell
Yeah, for you to have value.

Pete Mockaitis
A human being identity.

Margie Warrell
Yeah, and I think that can be, we can carry sometimes a sense of inadequacy in that we’re flawed, fallible in some way. And of course, let’s face it, we are all flawed and we are all fallible in some way. None of us are, get a 10 out of 10 on every category. That is part of the human condition, right? And so, my experience for myself, but also working with people, many whom have achieved incredible success, there’s often this insecurity in them that can be driving and driving, and actually can drive them to be work really hard and achieve amazing things.

But actually, they get to a level and that insecurity, if they haven’t done the inner work required to make peace with their vulnerabilities, to heal those childhood wounds, then that insecurity actually can cap them and ultimately can be a saboteur.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I would love to get your pro take. You’ve been working with many CEOs of large organizations with your time at Korn Ferry and your own work. So, just for funsies, could you share with us, roughly what percent of super high-achieving, big-deal executives have substantial levels of insecurity?

Margie Warrell
Well, substantial is a big word. But what percentage of high-achieving executives have some insecurity? I don’t want to say 100%, but I would say close to it because we all have something in us that can feel insecure at times. We all have moments of feeling insecure. None of us are invulnerable to things that can trigger something in us. So, I would say it’s close to 100 % of high-achieving executives have moments where they can feel insecure. But it’s whether they have their insecurities or their insecurities have them.

And so, when you use the word substantial insecurities, well, then that’s where, obviously, there’s a lot of insecurities that are running them versus them going, “Yeah, I’ve got this thing. This can make me feel insecure, but I’m self-aware enough.” And that’s where that self-awareness is so crucial to being a great leader, to being an effective executive, because we aren’t being governed by our insecurities and our fears.

And, of course, our fears don’t always show up as, “Oh, I’m really nervous. I’m so scared I’m going to mess this up.” You know, it’s not necessarily paralysis, it’s not panic, it’s not outward, overt self-doubt. More often, those insecurities can show up as intellectualizing emotions, being controlling, not delegating downward effectively, micromanaging, second-guessing people, being someone that is not okay with being challenged, so people don’t challenge because they know that this runs a risk.

And so, there’s lots of different ways that our insecurity, and let’s just be clear here, insecurity is just another term for an unfaced fear, an unprocessed fear.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, so you nailed it in terms of that’s what I mean by substantial insecurity, like you have a hard time being wrong or letting someone else shine, or clearly acknowledging humbly, it’s like, “Yeah, you know a lot more about this thing than I do. So, I’m going to let you take over.”

Margie Warrell
Yeah, you bet.

Pete Mockaitis
“And, hey, I like your idea better than mine. Let’s go with yours and forget what I said.”

Margie Warrell
And not just that, but actively seeking that out, too, and saying to people in the room, “Hey, look, I don’t know everything. You know, what is it that I could be missing here?” And actively soliciting people to put forward opinions that may actually contradict or, if not contradict, may not line squarely up with your own.

And when they say those things, that you might actually disagree with, you might actually think they’re wrong. And maybe they’re critical of you and the judgment that you’ve made, that you don’t get defensive, and you go, “Wow, tell me more about that. Tell me more about that.” And that people never have to hesitate to say that. And, to me, that is an indicator of a leader who has done their work, and who is well and truly leading from values and not emotions and not insecurity.

Because no matter what anyone says about them, they don’t get triggered by that, they don’t take offense, “How could you say that?” They’re, like, curious, they’re humble, they’re eager to learn and they listen with an ear to how they could be wrong. And then they always acknowledge when they’ve changed their mind and they share that, and go, “You know, I thought this, but, yeah, I realized I was wrong. I wasn’t factoring in these other things,” and they can share that openly. And there’s a lot of senior executives who are not in a place where they’re able to do that.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, that’s what I’m getting at. I think you’ve painted a lovely picture on what I mean by substantial insecurity versus substantial security. So, could you give us a very rough figure, like, at the top levels, who’s got that substantial insecurity and who doesn’t as a rough percentage?

Margie Warrell
I would say a solid 50%.

Pete Mockaitis
Fifty-fifty, all right.

Margie Warrell
Yeah, I mean, that could vary and it varies in organizations because there’s different cultures. So, I’ve worked in organizations where the culture is very grounded in purpose, and values, and authenticity, and people who posture and who are ego-driven, you know, overtly ego-driven. Their behavior gets, their, like, white bloods, they get ejected out.

Like, they can be really brilliant at what they do. But it’s like, at the end of the day, people are recognizing, “Ah, very ego-driven.” They’re an insecure person, even though they might be brilliant at what they do. And so, then there’s cultures where, “You know what, it’s about what are your numbers? Honestly, we don’t care much about all the other stuff. What are your numbers?”

And sometimes the people who get the best numbers are people who can be massively ego-driven and not the least bit, or very only mildly self-aware. And so, it’s all about, “Hah, who’s winning?Who’s winning? And who can get the biggest number fastest?” And that gets rewarded and that gets promoted.

And so, you end up with an executive bench of people who are all very, very ego-driven, competitive, but not necessarily particularly self-aware.

Whenever executive teams don’t make great decisions, and you see over time, there’s a leakage of value and the organization starts to lose edge and the culture grows, there’s toxic elements to it and disengagement and higher turnover, etc., it’s never because the people on that executive team lack intelligence individually or collectively, that they lack expertise and skill individually or collectively, that they lack access to information and resources.

It is because of the ego, and I’m talking about ego, I’m talking like, “I got to prove that I’m right and you’re wrong,” and there’s a defensiveness and it’s that insecurity at play because that undermines the dynamics in the team, and it undermines the quality of decision-making. There is not open, candid conversations. There is silos. There is protecting of information. There is a whole lot of conversations going on outside of the room. There is not good upward and sideways feedback.

And all of those factors at play, they are what create this slow leakage of value that, over time, you see organizations start to lose edge. And so, yeah, it’s not that they don’t know what to do, it’s that they’re not doing what they know.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, this reminds me, we had Pat Lencioni on the show and talking about smart versus healthy with regard to teams and dynamics and how it’s, a lot of times they got the know-how, but in terms of the courage and going there and having those conversations, it’s great.

So, it sounds like we’re pretty strong on the case here for how having more courage will help you be more awesome at your job with regard to just feeling good, facing down those monsters, as well as better teamwork, etc. Any other key things you’d put forward in terms of the case for why professionals would be better off with an extra dose of courage?

Margie Warrell
Well, let me just share, there’s two core dimensions to courage. And we often focus in on the field of fear and do it anyway, “Be bold. Take a risk. Put yourself out there. Set a bold vision. Have the crucial conversations. Take those risks for yourself, professionally,” in terms of then leading how you manage others.

But what we often fail to factor in is the second dimension of courage, and that is the regulation of our fear, the management of our anxious thinking. Because courage is action in the presence of fear and the presence of risks, real or perceived, but often we’re more afraid than we need to be. And right now, it’s a perfect case in point.

There are a lot of people right now who are feeling incredibly anxious because there is immense uncertainty. Yes, there is a new administration in the White House. There has been massive disruption. The markets are volatile. People are worried about the future. But you know what? There’s always been uncertainty. We’ve always had disruption. And, yes, it may feel like, “Oh, no, but not like this.” But these times have come before and they’ve gone before.

And so, a lot of the time we are victim to what’s called certainty bias. When we look back at the past, we know how the story ended, so we go, “No, it wasn’t like this,” because we don’t know how the story is going to end. But five years from now, we’re going to look back on this moment right now and go, “Oh, well, you know, it worked out,” and because there’s going to be new uncertainty.

So, often people are feeling more anxious than they need to be, and anxiety magnifies our perceptions of risk. And people pull back and they triple on what they can control and they try and find certainty so they get really short-sighted, and then they fail to take the very actions that would actually expand future possibilities, that would grow and accelerate learning curves, so that they’d be in a better position for whatever unfolds out the other side of this disruption, whether that’s Gen AI, whether that’s regulatory policy changing, etc.

And so, I think it’s just so important for people to realize it’s not just about, “Be brave. Just put yourself out there.” It’s also going, “Where am I scaring myself because of how I am perceiving all of the risks and all the uncertainty and all the unknowns? And where am I being a little short-sighted and not looking far enough ahead to the horizon and go, what is it that I could be doing right now that will put me in a better position, one, three, five years from now?”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, can you share with us what are some of your favorite tips, tricks, interventions, actions, things to do to get more courage?

Margie Warrell
Well, obviously in The Courage Gap, I talk about five key principles for closing that gap between what we could do and what we actually do, between our insight and the impact we make for ourselves, for others. And the first one of those principles is focusing on what it is that you want, what is the highest outcome you want to achieve.

And that could be, right now, today, “With an employee, my boss, a co-worker, I’m having a difficult time with. There’s a lot of frustration. Maybe I’m feeling really resentful toward them. Maybe I’m feeling underappreciated.” So, ask yourself, what is your highest intention for that relationship? Or, if it’s your career, “What is my highest intention for my career over the next one year, three years, five, 10?”

Because, if we’re not clear about what it is we want, our vision and our values, then our attention is going to be held captive by what it is we don’t want, because fear is a really potent emotion. We naturally gravitate to the negatives, to what’s wrong, to what we can’t do, to what we hope won’t happen.

And so, there is a huge power that we unlock within ourselves, but also it expands our field of vision of what actions we can take when we connect to what it is we do want and what our highest intention is, what our ultimate outcome is, because what we focus on expands. Energy multiplies by a factor of what our attention is on.

And so, that is a key principle. And many people don’t realize how much of their time and how much of their energy and how many of their conversations are all about what is wrong, and what can’t be done, and what shouldn’t happen, and what a pain their boss is, or what a pain this colleague is, versus “What can they do? What do they have? What do they want? How can they work better with this colleague? How can they help foster a better relationship with their boss?”

And the way I could go about doing that versus kind of being stuck in either a self-pity, you know, feeling like a bit of a victim or getting stuck into a blame like, “Ugh,” or just having a story that we are powerless to improve our situation, which is never true. And the biggest way we disempower ourselves is telling ourselves we can’t do anything.

Pete Mockaitis
Now, when you say highest intention, you mean highest in the sense of most noble and in fulfillment of our deepest, most important values, as opposed to just a really big achievement, like high, like Mount Everest high.

Margie Warrell
The two don’t have to be mutually exclusive. So, you can have a really high intention to live a life of adventure and do amazing things, and that means you want to climb Mount Everest. But it also could mean, “I want to have a really good relationship with the people on my team. I want to do what I can to be the kind of person that I would want to work with.” But the highest intention, whatever it is, it has to align with our deepest values. So, what are your deepest values that want to define you and how you live your life?

And it’s funny you mentioned, you know, climbing a mountain. Several years back, I climbed Mount Kilimanjaro with my husband and our four teenage children, which was a pretty bold, audacious undertaking at the time because we lived at sea level in Australia. We didn’t go mountain climbing on weekends for fun because there weren’t any mountains near us. And so, it was pretty bold to kind of go, “All right, let’s do this.”

But one of my kids, Ben, said, “Hey, wouldn’t it be cool to climb Mount Kilimanjaro for dad’s 50th birthday?” He did this whole PowerPoint deck. He rallied the whole family behind this vision of climbing to the rooftop of Africa for dad’s 50th, “Our family will always remember it.” So, we created an intention for, as a family, right, to do this thing that would be so cool. There was a chance we weren’t going to get to the top. The altitude can really take a toll on our bodies, particularly younger bodies. My youngest was 13 at the time, but that intention to do that is what kind of galvanized our collective resolve to go, “Let’s try.”

And as it was, we did make it to the top of Kilimanjaro. It was a really tough day, but our intention will always align with some value. I mean, I have no desire to climb Mount Everest after climbing Kilimanjaro, but for us as a family, like this would be a really cool thing to do as a family. That was a value.

But for some people, it could be, “I want to just build a business that contributes to my community, that serves the needs of these customers, these people in my local geography,” or maybe it’s to do something that’s on a global scale, but there’s still a value that it’s aligned with. But for people listening to this, I know for me, professionally, I have always wanted to do work that aligned with, one, yes, my value to make an impact for others, to help others live their purpose, to use their talents for the greater good, but also to use my talents in a way that honors those talents.

And so, we all have different talents. People, we come out of the womb with different gifts and, yes, we have to hone them. But so it could be that you just really want to do something that lights you up. You’re leveraging your strengths fully. We thrive the most when we are leveraging our strengths in service of something that’s meaningful to us versus something that’s purely superficial. And while when we’re younger, sometimes it is superficial. As we go through life, people who thrive the most are doing things, they’re working hard toward meaningful goals.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, and I guess that’s what I’m zeroing in on when I say highest intention is it’s like, you could have, maybe you want to build a business to prove everyone wrong, “They thought I couldn’t do it. Look at me now.” Or it’s like, “I want to have a sick Lamborghini.” So, these are things that motivate some people. But I’m guessing that if we dig deeper into values work, those wouldn’t be, in fact, the highest intention that have the most potency for boosting the courage.

Margie Warrell
Well, look, and if you love cars and you want to have a Lamborghini, like, great, knock yourself out and work hard for that Lamborghini. I’m not a car person myself, but if your sense of security and identity is coming from sources outside of yourself, then you will always feel a little insecure. Because once you’ve got that Lamborghini and you drive it right up the main street of town and you’ve got the music blaring and you’re making sure everyone’s looking at you, and they’re like, “Wow, you’ve got a Lamborghini.” It’s like, “Great, it feels good. Like, yeah. See? See my Lamborghini?”

But, okay, after a while, it gets a little, it wears off. We habituate to, “Okay, now what do I have to do?” Because it’s a cup with a hole in the bottom. It’s never going to fill up if your sense of worth and value has to be externally validated all the time. And that’s not to say, it’s natural to want to have external validation. I love external validation.

But if that’s what our identity is built on, it’s going to be built on a house of cards because, you know, what happens if you lose your Lamborghini? What happens if you lose all your money? That can happen. That does happen to people. And so, I think we have to be really careful about where our sense of identity comes from. And there is no greater source of identity than being really living in alignment with our values. It is got to be an internally sourced identity versus externally validated all the time.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, we’ve got five principles. The first is the highest intention. What’s the next?

Margie Warrell
Second is re-scripting the narratives that are keeping you stuck, stressed, or living too safely. So, of course, we all tell ourselves stories all the time, like, “Oh, it’s a nice day out there today.” As it is, while I’m talking to you, I can see the cherry blossoms coming out here in North Virginia. But sometimes our stories get in our way and keep us from doing the very things that would serve us.

So, our stories can stoke up our fear. They can make us feel more stressed like, you know, we tell ourselves stories, “Oh, it’s the end of the world,” “I’m never going to get another job,” “I’m too old.” There’s a lot, I’m surrounded by people who use even language, “It’s a nightmare situation. I’m never going to be able to figure this out.”

And so, they make themselves feel more stressed than they need to be. But sometimes our stories can give us air cover for living too safely, for going, “Oh, well, you know, it’s not so bad. And everybody else has got it worse than me. Or, at least I’ve got a job.” And I’m like, “Yeah, but are you happy in your job?” “Yeah, but at least it pays the bills.” I’m like, “Come on, like life’s short.” And so, we can often tell ourselves stories that keep us from taking the very actions we’re wholly capable of taking.

Sometimes we tell ourselves lies. We call them vital lies, the soothing myths, truths that spare us from having to look at ourself and go, “What is the price I’m paying for the story that I’m telling myself? It’s making me feel okay in the moment, but it’s actually keeping me stuck. It’s actually keeping me from connecting in more meaningful ways with other people, or making a change that I know deep, deep down, I really need to make because I’m not feeling a sense of purpose. I’m not feeling like I’m living the life I want to be living?”

And so, just recognizing that if your stories aren’t making you feel more powerful, like they’re not empowering you, if they’re not aligning with something that gives you a sense of meaning and purpose, and if they’re not making you feel more positive about your future, then your stories are working against you.

And I often say to people, like, “Tell me, what’s your ultimate vision of success?” And then they’ll go, “Well…” And when they let themselves really connect with that vision and they focus on what they want, I’m like, “Well, what story would you need to be telling yourself for that to become your reality?” because our beliefs are the software of behavior. Everything we do is belief-driven. So, what’s the story that you need to tell yourself so that you’ll take the actions to create the outcomes you want?

And if you’re feeling stuck in your career or you’re feeling like you’re hitting your head against a wall, I would just say to you, like, “What’s the story you’ve been telling yourself? And what emotions does that create? Where is that keeping you playing too small? Where is that keeping you stuck in excuses? Where is that keeping you showing up in a more diminutive way than really serves you? And so, what’s another story you could tell and re-script that story? Because you create your stories, but your stories then create you.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And the third principle?

Margie Warrell
The third principle is about embodying courage and connecting to the sources of courage within us, but also around us in our relationships with others. And often we don’t recognize how we’re moving through the world in an anxious state. John Wooden, the great iconic basketball coach, once said, “It’s not about how tall you are. It’s about how tall you play.”

And often we don’t realize how much fear is trapped in our bodies, keeping us from showing up, stepping up, speaking up, walking into a room in a way that not only changes how others perceive us, but changes how we perceive ourselves. Some great research out of the Kellogg School of Business that found that postural expansiveness literally shifts how people perceive us, as well as how we perceive ourselves, regardless of our actual status on an organization chart. And so, just stand tall and take a deep breath and reset your nervous system, named a nervous system for reason at that ground level, and, likewise, connect with people around you who make you feel braver, who help to quell the doubts versus to feed them.

 

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And the fourth?

Margie Warrell
That’s about stepping into discomfort and really resetting our relationship with discomfort. All of us are wired to want to avoid what’s uncomfortable, but the more willing you are to do uncomfortable things and embracing discomfort, embracing the growing pains, it actually will expand your behavioral repertoire to do the very things that are going to set you up for success.

And there is a lot to be said for recognizing that our fear constricts what we do. And the more we’re willing to get comfortable, practice getting comfortable being uncomfortable, then it expands us to do all sorts of things. Because when you’re willing to feel anything, it emboldens you for everything.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And the fifth?

Margie Warrell
And the fifth is all about making peace with our failures and making peace with ourselves for failing to show up as the person we most want to be sometimes because no one is brave all the time. And the more we can be kind to ourselves in those moments when we either try something and fail, or we fail to try, and that little inner Chicken Little wins out, then the quicker we’ll be able to pick ourselves up, to dust ourselves off, to learn the lessons that our failures and our mistakes hold, and then to move forward more wisely.

And for those who are listening who can be really hard on themselves, I think this final step which is about finding the treasure when you trip can be the most, the biggest unlock because we’re so often really hard on ourselves. And when you’re really hard on yourself, it doesn’t make you braver. It actually makes you live a little smaller and hold back from taking the very risks that would serve you most.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, let’s talk about the rescripting narratives for a bit. Could you give us a common narrative that you’ve seen hold folks back and an example of a finer script to replace it?

Margie Warrell
Yes. So, as people are moving up in their careers, often they’ll look at management, the leadership, and it’s them, they over there, you know, “They don’t care. They have no idea what’s going on. They’re just, you know, they’re all so disconnected and removed from what it’s really like to try and run this business at the ground level and deal with the clients, etc.”

And so, there’s this kind of othering of those people in management, those who are on the executive team. And the reality is those people were once in your shoes, and sometimes people become the they, and they realize, “You know, if only management…” I’m like, “You are management. You are the they, like this is you.”

But wherever you sit on your career trajectory and on some org chart, recognizing that you have the power to be a leader at every level. And so, rescripting it about how you see yourself in your own power, like, “I am a leader. I have the ability to influence change here. And, sure, I mightn’t have as much as the person at the top, but I have the ability to lead change in the sphere of influence in my workplace every day.” So, that’s one re-script.

Another key one I hear people talking about is other people and saying things like, “Ugh, they’re so intimidating. They don’t care,” and they create negative narratives, and maybe there’s some evidence to support them. But when it comes to saying someone is intimidating or something, “That person is an a-hole,” or something like that, ask yourself instead, “What is it that’s going on in me that needs me to judge them? That person’s going to be how that person’s going to be, but how do I choose to show up?”

So, I choose to show up as someone who is empowered and is focused on bringing value regardless of how the behavior of others around me, and by reclaiming kind of the power that I get to choose how I show up, regardless of what other people are doing. And that often when we call other people intimidating, actually they’re not intimidating. It’s the story you’re telling yourself about them that’s making you feel intimidated. It’s got nothing to do with them. It’s got everything to do with you. So, yeah, there’s a couple of examples right there. I hope that’s of value.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, well, thank you. Well, tell me, Margie, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about your favorite things?

Margie Warrell
Well, I would simply say if there’s something that’s causing you stress right now, that just keeps coming up again and again, maybe in different clothes, but it’s just a recurring issue, in there, lays your greatest growth. In there is an un-face fear, there is fear in some form that’s kept you from addressing it more effectively.

Maybe taking ownership for something that you’re doing that’s contributing to it, that you’d rather blame it on everyone else. But recognizing that those things that test you the most, also teach you the most and can be the catalyst for your highest growth and transformation.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. And now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Margie Warrell
Anais, Nin, “Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one’s courage.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Margie Warrell
My favorite study is the work of Amy Edmondson out of Harvard on psychological safety, and that it’s the teams that report the most mistakes that are actually the highest performing because they feel safe enough to be able to share the truth.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite book?

Margie Warrell
My favorite book would be The Road Less Traveled by Scott Peck.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite tool you use to be awesome at your job?

Margie Warrell
My daily planner.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Margie Warrell
Reading wisdom literature first thing in the morning over my cup of tea in the early hours to set my intention for the day.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And is there a Margie original sound bite or nugget that people quote back to you often?

Margie Warrell
Yes, and that’s “Living bravely is indispensable for living well.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Margie Warrell
They can head over to my website, MargieWarrell.com, or just connect with me on LinkedIn or anywhere that you hang out on social media, or my Live Brave Podcast.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Margie Warrell
Thank you. I invite people to take my courage quiz. If you head over to my website, to “The Courage Gap” page, you’ll see The Courage Quiz, and I invite you to take it because it’ll help you identify where the courage gaps are in your life and how you can close them.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Margie, thank you.

Margie Warrell
Thank you.