Tag

Influence Archives - How to be Awesome at Your Job

1109: How to Find Great Mentors and Build Your Legacy with Dr. Deborah Heiser

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Dr. Deborah Heiser discusses how and why to find mentors from all directions.

You’ll Learn

  1. The fundamental human need that mentorship fulfills
  2. Why most struggle to find mentors—and the simple fix
  3. The unlikely places where you can find more mentors

About Deborah

Dr. Deborah Heiser (Ph.D.) is an applied developmental psychologist, the CEO/Founder of The Mentor Project, and author of The Mentorship Edge: Creating Maximum Impact Through Lateral and Hierarchical Mentoring. She is a TEDx speaker, member of Marshall Goldsmith 100 Coaches, Thinkers 50 Radar List, expert contributor to Psychology Today and is also an Adjunct Professor in the Psychology Department at SUNY Old Westbury.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Deborah Heiser Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Debra, welcome.

Deborah Heiser
Thanks for having me. I’m delighted to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to chat about mentorship, and I understand that you currently have a 21-year-old mentor. What’s the story here?

Deborah Heiser
So, I am 57. I’m a Gen Xer. And I decided that I wanted to try out social media for the next big thing that I’m working on, and to get some word out there. So, I asked if this person, who’s 21, could mentor me. I didn’t say, “Hey, can you be my mentor?”

But we talked. And he agreed. And so, he’s been mentoring me for two and a half months now. And it’s amazing to be in the position of a mentee. It made me have a whole new perspective.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s super. Well, could you share with us what’s a social media insight you’ve picked up from this 21-year-old phenom?

Deborah Heiser
That it is not as easy as it looks, that there’s a lot of work that goes into it. There’s a lot of thought that has to go into it. Even the things that are supposed to look really completely off the cuff, they’re generally not. So that was really a new insight for me.

Pete Mockaitis
Understood. Thank you. Yeah, I think I’d heard Mr. Beast, a top Youtuber, say, “People are surprised all the time when they learn just how much tremendous work and effort goes into these videos. We’re not just a bunch of folks goofing around. There’s huge sets and teams and productions.”

Deborah Heiser
You know, it wasn’t just the work, right? I had to learn from him the work. I had to learn the culture. So, the very first livestream he put me on TikTok, I was getting all of these comments that were coming into the feed, like, “UNC” was one of them. I was thinking the person was talking about the university. No, it’s “unc.” It means I’m old and outdated.

So, it was really funny to learn about how people perceived me in the Gen Z population, and how I needed to learn the culture and learn what was relevant to people that were outside of the Gen X age group.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, shucks. Well, you know what, I guess I’m learning something too. I thought “unc,” I knew it was short for uncle, and it meant that this person is older, but I had sort of hoped and thought it might’ve had affectionate connotations, but you’re telling me it doesn’t, okay.

Deborah Heiser
No. And I learned that without knowing that. He had to explain that to me. And so, that was kind of funny.

Pete Mockaitis
I just remember Bryan Johnson is often called the “Immortal Unc” and I thought that was endearing, but I guess it’s not. Okay, I’m learning. Well, so I think that’s a nice little lesson in terms of mentorship, in terms of the things maybe you thought you know, maybe you don’t. And you get that wisdom from different perspectives and engaging in different kinds of folks.

So, you’ve been in this game for a while. We got the book, The Mentorship Edge, which we’re chatting about. You are the CEO and founder of The Mentor Project. So, could you maybe kick us off with anything that’s particularly striking or surprising for folks when you’re teaching about mentorship and they go, “Whoa, seriously, for real?”

Deborah Heiser
Everyone is a mentor and you just don’t realize it. So, most people think that mentorship is for work and it can be and is, and that’s a great place to look for mentorship or to become a mentor. But mentorship is something that’s in our families that we’ve been doing forever. If you subscribe to any religion, that’s passed down through mentorship, centuries.

We’re never going to remember Bob the accountant, but we remember what religion and the traditions and the values that we have in our family that get passed down. And we often take that for granted, but that’s mentorship, all of that is. The family traditions at every holiday that you engage in, that’s mentorship.

So, we’re doing all of this and we just don’t give credit to the grandmas and grandpas out there who are doing this every day, or to ourselves when we say, “This value means something to me. I’m going to pass it on.” So that’s a big surprise to a lot of people. They think that mentorship is saved for someone with an advanced degree or a specific title, and, really, it’s not. Everybody is always mentoring and they’re being mentored and we just don’t always realize that.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, we’re always mentoring and we’re always being mentored, and you mentioned some of those contexts. What exactly is your definition for mentorship then?

Deborah Heiser
Mentorship actually has five components to it. So, it has to start with the developmental… I just want to say that we’re developmentally, just like walking and talking is a developmental life stage. We are developmentally programmed to want to give back. And so we are, it’s like a developmental milestone. So, it’s something that we should be expecting to do.

So, it first starts with generativity. And generativity is where we have a desire to give a bit of ourselves to somebody else without expecting anything in return. We’re all doing that. If a friend calls and says, “Hey, can I pick your brain?” You don’t say, “Buzz off.” You say, “Of course.” We’re always doing this.

And the reason we do this, engage in generativity, is because we like that a little piece of us lives on in somebody else. We like that we’re valued enough, or something that we value is valued enough, that somebody else wants to carry that.

The next thing it needs is intrinsic motivation. So, if I’m being paid to mentor, I’m not a mentor. You have to be doing it simply because you want to do it. And the example I give is if I said, “Hey, Pete, would you like to go volunteer at a soup kitchen, giving out food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people?” You might say, “Yes.”

Now imagine you’re on your way to the soup kitchen to deliver food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people, and I say, “Hey, Pete, take a left. I want you to go to Starbucks and volunteer your time there instead.” Well, that’s going to have a whole different feeling, even though you’re giving food and beverage to hungry, thirsty people for free.

And that’s what we need with mentoring. And we do this all the time. We’re all very helpful to others. We want to be, we like it, we get a good feeling from it. We also need to have a meaningful connection. So, a lot of people will say to me, “Oh, my gosh, I have this toxic mentor, the person is horrible. How do I deal with it?” But that’s not a mentor. You have to like the person. They have to like you. It’s kind of like a friend.

If you have some friend who is mean to you, they’re not your friend. So, you need that meaningful connection. You also need trust. So, Pete, if you were a boss of mine and I had an issue where I didn’t know how to do something at work, I might wonder if I could go to you and say, “Hey, I don’t know what I’m doing. Can you guide me through this?” Because I might think, “Wow, he’s going to find out I don’t know what I’m doing and he’ll never give me a raise or a promotion.”

So, likewise, if I was your mentee and you said, “I’m not going to share my knowledge and expertise with her. She’s going to go start her own company with that.” You have to trust me, but that has to go in both directions. And, finally, there has to be a goal. A lot of people think, “I’m just going to meet with somebody for an hour every week, and I’m just going to meet with them, and somehow I’ll get mentorship.”

Mentorship is an exchange of something with a goal. So, it’d be like, “Can you tell me the lay of the land at work?” or, “I’m a hardware engineer. Can your software engineer help me solve a problem that I need to have that involved with it?” It’s combining that. As long as it has all five of those, it’s mentorship. If it’s missing one, it’s not. It’s like baking brownies without sugar. It’ll look like it, but won’t taste like it.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so understood, those are the components that exist within that. And so, I’m hearing you that those five ingredients can be present in all sorts of relationships, interactions, as opposed to formal career professional, “I want to sharpen my skills in digital advertising, whatever, exchanges.”

Deborah Heiser
It can be in all of those. I’ll give you an example. Irene Yachbes, she worked for NASA. She pushed the launch button on the mission to Mercury. She’s an aerospace engineer. She’s smart. She went to work for IBM, and she walked in and she said it was like going to the first day of middle school, “Who do you eat with? Where do you go? What do you do?”

So, this very smart person was looking for, “I don’t even know where the bathroom is here.” And so, she said, “I just need to know the lay of the land here.” And so, somebody at her office was giving a talk in her first week, and said, “If anybody would like a mentor, reach out to me.”

So, Irene called me and she said, “I can’t reach out to her. I’m too intimidated. I’m brand new here.” And I was like, “What are you talking about? Just email her.” And she did, and she said, “I just need to know the lay of the land. Can you help me out with that?” And the person said, “Yes.” They met for 15 minutes and that led to a four-year mentorship.

So that does apply. The person liked Irene, Irene liked her. It ended up that all five of those components were met. We just don’t think about those components when we’re reaching out to somebody. But she didn’t say to her, “Hey, mentor me.” She came with a specific goal.

Pete Mockaitis
Understood. And I think that just going through those ingredients, I think, might spark some ideas for people here, it’s like, “Hey, you know what? I’ve got a sense of a meaningful connection and trust with this person who knows some stuff that I need to know. Why the heck don’t I just go ahead and reach out?”

Deborah Heiser
Yeah, it’s the same as when we make friends. You know you don’t have to go through your thing, and say, “Does that person share my values?” No, you could have 10 people that cross your path, and there’s one that you say, “Ooh, I like that person. I’m going to hang out with that person.”

If you were to dissect that, you’d find out that you have criteria that you’re checking off to see if it matched for that. So that’s all that I’m saying with this checklist that is for mentoring.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Now you’ve said that about half of young professionals say they feel kind of lost in their careers. What do we think is behind this and how does mentoring play in?

Deborah Heiser
I think that most people that I’ve talked to say they’re intimidated and they think that mentoring is only hierarchical. They have also said to me that they are looking for somebody who’s going to open the doors and lift them up into the new job they want. That’s too vague. If I said to somebody, “I want you to solve all the problems that I don’t even know I have,” there’s an issue.

So, people come to me and they’ll say, “Can you be my mentor?” And I’ll say, “Sure, what in? How? What would you like me to help you with?” And they say, “I don’t know.” And then I have to say, “Well, okay, what are some of your goals?” “I’m not sure.” And so, all I say to people who are starting out is have a tiny ask, one small ask.

So, if somebody like Irene said, “Can you show me the lay of the land?” A person could say yes or no. And that’s an accomplishable goal. And within that very first moment, you can determine, “Is this somebody I could mentor or be mentored by?” You can feel each other out. So, start with something super, super small.

You could ask a person, “Hey, I would love to learn an aspect of the job that you do in advertising. I think that I could learn from you. Can I just ask you a few questions?” And you just have something that could take maybe five minutes, and then you can take it from there. That person may or may not be the person that’s best for you.

And the other thing is I tell people is you do not have to look hierarchically up the ladder. That’s very limited. You only have a certain number of people who are directly above you. But if you look to your left and to your right, you have countless people who can help you. And if I look at all of the cases of the people who are like famous lateral mentors, that’s the founding fathers of the United States. Nobody was the boss.

Every entrepreneur who starts a company, they can’t look up. They have to look to their left or to their right. Steve Jobs looked to Steve Wozniak as a lateral mentor. All of these cases are people who didn’t look hierarchically for help. So, anybody who’s starting out, if you’re feeling vulnerable, insecure, look to your left or to your right, somebody in a different department.

And you can ask them questions. You can say, “Hey, from an outside perspective, what do you see is a path for me and my department? Do you have any tips or pointers for working within my department in this new job that I have?” That’s something that people can do very easily. And I’ll give you one more, quick example.

I was speaking with an Iowa federal judge, and he was saying, “Look, judges can’t be vulnerable. You can’t say, ‘Hey, I don’t know how to handle that case. Like, I don’t know what to do.’ That’s not going to work well.” So lateral mentoring was something that was really important to this group of federal judges.

So, what they did was they put in an informal lunch and everybody got to come in and sit next to somebody. So, somebody was able to say, “Hey, Bob, you handled that case. How did you do that?” Now, that’s not a person saying, “I don’t know what I’m doing.” That’s a person saying, “How did you handle something?” And then that person was able to start without showing a vulnerability, but they saw an incredible increase in mentorship that was happening laterally because it removed that vulnerability.

So, if you’re starting out, think about the power that is to the left or to the right of you where you’re not worried about somebody feeling like you’re stepping on their toes, they’re competing for your job, they’re not competing for a promotion from you. They’re going to share very readily with you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that a lot. And I’m thinking now about my podcast mastermind group, and they’re wonderful, they’ve all been guests on the show. And it’s interesting about the lateral piece is that I wouldn’t say any of us is like the top dog, you know? It’s sort of like it’s clear that all of us have our respective strengths and areas where we’re excelling and others can learn from each other there.

And it’s really quite lovely because, in the course of sharing, we discover stuff. It’s like, “Hey, you seem to know a lot about how these advertising is working. And you seem to have a really engaged growing program over here.” And we’re all able to share the goodies.

And especially, over time, when you talk about trust, you realize just how much of our hangups are emotionally-driven and irrational. It’s like, “Oh, I should maybe just chill out about that. Oh, okay. I’ll just stop worrying and give it a shot. How about that?” So many breakthroughs boil down to that.

Deborah Heiser
Absolutely. I love the example that you brought up because so many of us join groups. There are people who join book clubs. They join. We’re all joiners, right? People join all kinds of things. That’s a great place to find mentorship. Most of us think that if we’re in the job, we have to find our mentor in our job.

But I’m going to give you a quick example of a workplace where somebody who was new at their job came in and they said, “Uh-oh,” and they got mentorship. So, this guy, Steve, was at his job and he had a boss who gave him an impossible task with a super short deadline. And Steve didn’t know what he was doing. But Steve was like, “I got it,” when the boss came in and said, “Hey, can you get this done?”

So, the boss came in a couple of days later and was like, “Steve, you haven’t made any progress.” And Steve was like, “Don’t you worry. I got it. I got it.” He was afraid he was going to get fired. So, he didn’t ever tell his boss, “I don’t know what I’m doing.” When I talk to people, everybody’s been there at some point where you’re like, “Okay, I can do this.”

So, what happened was, the next day the boss came in, he’s like, “Listen, you either got this or you don’t. What’s the deal here?” So, Steve said, “I told you I got it. I do.” The boss left, and he immediately called his friend, Steve. And he’s like, “Steve, can you help me? I don’t know what I’m doing. I know that you know this different kind of engineering than I know. Can you come in and help?” And so, Steve said, “Yeah, I’ll come in after work. I got to finish my job. And then I’ll come in and help you.”

So, in he comes, everybody is gone in the workplace, but he comes in and they work together. And Steve’s like, “Oh, my gosh. Thank you, Steve, for coming. This is so helpful. I’m making progress here. Keep teaching me what you know.” So, they made a lot of progress.

The boss comes in the next day, and he’s like, “Steve, I can’t believe all the progress you made.” And he said, “I told you I knew what I was doing.” And long story short, they worked together and the project gets done a week earlier than expected.

And the boss came and said, “I can’t believe you did this a week earlier than was expected.” That job was Atari. The boss was Al Alcorn, the engineer that didn’t know what he was doing was Steve Jobs, and the person who helped him was Steve Wozniak. That very first project was Breakout, the first video game. And that was lateral mentoring.

Steve didn’t feel comfortable in his own job. He was brand new. He thought he was going to get fired if he didn’t do this. So, he called his friend, Steve, who worked in a completely different area. And that was lateral mentoring. And so, when you’re in the workplace, you do not have to think of the workplace as your only way to find a solution to what you need or the mentoring that you need to get.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that a lot. Thank you. So, let’s hear on the other side of things, you talked about generativity, and that is just sort of a human developmental thing. I don’t know if there’s a particular age or years in the career or threshold in which this kind of kicks into higher gear, but tell us a bit about that and where to proceed with it.

Deborah Heiser
So, generativity is a life stage just like walking, any physical life stage that we have. And it kicks in specifically at its highest point in midlife. So, between 40 and 65, you should really see people ramping up. You’ll see things like people say, “I’m going to start a blog,” “I’m going to start a podcast,” because that’s a form of mentorship. It’s a modern form of mentorship. So, you, Pete, are mentoring right now in a modern way.

So, people will start to kick in to doing that. They get an itch to give back. And so those are some of the ways that we see people doing that in midlife. But the reason we have that is because you reach midlife, all prior to midlife, you’ve had boxes to check off that other people put in front of you, “Finish school,” “Maybe go to college,” “Get a house,” “Buy a car,” “Get married,” “Have a family,” “Have a career,” “Get advanced in your career,” “Become an expert in something.”

All of these things are outside, external kind of boxes that we check. Then midlife hits and you’re like, “Huh, I get to pick my own boxes. What am I going to check?” And that’s when it hits us, and we say, “Do I matter in the world? What’s my footprint doing? How deep is it? And what do I want that footprint to look like?”

And it’s the first moment that we have the time to do that and we have the bandwidth to do this. So that’s why there’s a pretty big window for that. So, you could be 40, and say, “I am not there. I’m really busy.” It could be between 40 and 65 that it really hits for people. And that’s when people are looking to give back their expertise, their values, their traditions, their usefulness to others.

It makes them feel relevant. It makes them feel useful. It makes them feel like they matter in the world, like they didn’t just take up space. And so, that’s what generativity is all about. So, if you’re looking at somebody in midlife, that is a great person to look to, to mentor you, because they’re probably looking to mentor someone.

Pete Mockaitis
And if we are in that stage and we’re feeling those things, what do you recommend we go do?

Deborah Heiser
That you look within yourself and say, “What is it that I think is important to me?” Some people will say, “Well, it’s the things that are in my personal life.” Some people will say, “I want to pass on the traditions and values that I hold dear in my family.” And that could be religion, that could be your traditions that are in your family. It could be values.

It could be that you say, “I want to be remembered or known for this expertise that I had.” So, whatever that is, it could be different for every single person. And that expertise is all you have to tap into. And most people think, “Well, it has to be something really profound.” And it’s not. It’s the little things that we do.

So, the very first thing I say to people is show up. Just show up in places because that’s your opportunity to find out what you’d like to give back. And showing up is like the first beginning step of mentorship. So, you know, that can be a value. If someone is in need and they’re in the hospital, show up, go visit them. That’s a form of saying, ‘You matter, I care for you.”

If you make an appointment on somebody’s calendar, show up. If you’re going to go to a funeral, show up. All of these things that maybe we say to ourselves, “I don’t know if it really matters.” It does. That’s the very first thing that you can do that costs nothing and doesn’t require you to have a degree or anything else. It’s just showing up. And then that’s going to be the first step of making the mentorship happen.

Pete Mockaitis
And what’s next?

Deborah Heiser
So, once you’ve showed up, the next thing is that you want to see if you make a connection with somebody. Is there somebody who you can see who wants what you have? So, if I have an expertise in something, and I go to give it to you, let’s say my expertise is in, I don’t know, crocheting. I’m a master crocheter and I say, “Hey, Pete, I’d like to teach you how to crochet,” and you have no interest in crocheting. Well, that first step is, “Okay, we don’t have it.”

But if I meet somebody else and they say, “I’ve always been wanting to learn how to crochet,” then there we go. It’s the same with if you go into work and you’re looking for somebody or showing up to things, you go onto the big Zoom, you’re at the water cooler, you’re at the lunch, you’re at the grand rounds, if you’re in a hospital, wherever you are, you’re showing up.

Who is it that looks like they’re receptive to what you need? And then you’re basically finding that person, “Hey, does this interest you? No? Okay, next. Who’s out there looking for that?” It’s the same as when you’re podcasting and you’re putting something out there. Not everybody is going to resonate, but those that do and they say, “I’m going to come back over and over again.” Those are your meaningful connections.

So, the next step is really connecting with people, “Who, out here, is looking for what I have?” It’s developing the trust by continuing to show up and it’s engaging with that individual to see if you can make change for them.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, and it really is beautiful. As I’m just imagining this and I’m reflecting on experiences I’ve had, it really is a beautiful, human, heartfelt, deep, emotional, good thing. You know, it’s like right up there. And I’m thinking about, I’ve heard in academic scholarship circles, and maybe you can comment on this, good doctor.

That sometimes, when folks retire, a beautiful gift they receive is sort of like the grand tree that shows their mentees, protegees, doctoral candidates that they brought up, who in turn brought up the next generation and the next generation. You can just sort of see the lineage flowing through and rippling out as just like a top retirement gift for folks in that zone.

I’ve heard of this as a thing that has happened on multiple occasions. So, it was like, that sounds like about the top thing you would want at your retirement party.

Deborah Heiser

Yes. We all want to feel a sense of legacy, and we start to build our legacy as early as we can think. We’re building how we’re going to be remembered by others. And that tree that you’re talking about is incredibly important. So, the term legacy tree was coined by Bob Lefkowitz. He’s a Nobel Prize winner in chemistry from 2012.

And he published, he wanted to know, “Why am I a Nobel Prize winner and not somebody else?” He was like, “I was born in the Bronx. What made me stand out from anybody else? I’m not smarter than other people. What is it?” So, he decided to make a legacy tree for himself that showed all the mentors above him, those that were on his level, and the mentees, very few, because most of us don’t even realize when we’re mentoring, that were below him. And he published it in a journal.

And two weeks later, he went to a conference, and somebody came up to him and he said, “Hey, Bob, I’m six degrees Lefkowitz.” And he was like, “What are you talking about?” And the guy said, “Hey, there are five people who’ve worked between you and me. And here I am continuing the work that you started.” Bob said, “What are you talking about? Tell me about your work.”

He told him about his work, and he was able to hear his own words spoken by this person he had never met, and he was able to see how his work had snowballed out six degrees away from him. And he said he’d never felt more profound emotion than the birth of his children and getting married than at that moment because he knew that he mattered and he knew he had a legacy.

So that academic legacy, the tree that you talk about, that’s what we’re trying to build. And if we are able to create our own legacy trees, we’re able to see what our impact is and see what our legacy actually is. And that’s very meaningful to us. Most of us aren’t able to harness that.

It’s kind of like when you donate and you don’t remember you donated anything until tax time and you have to like go through your tax return and say, “Oh, yeah, I know I donated this.” We forget all of the good things that we do, all the volunteering, all the philanthropy, all of the mentoring that we do throughout the year. And it just gets kind of folded into our everyday life.

So, if we can acknowledge the moments that we mentor, or we acknowledge the moments that we’ve been mentored and we thank the people that have mentored us, it makes us do it more and it ties it back to legacy so that we then can feel our impact. We can actually get that feeling that we want that’s kind of like the Grinch whose heart grew three times in size. That’s how we feel when we start to, you know, really acknowledge our legacy.

Pete Mockaitis
Ooh, yeah, you know, you’re right. That profound emotional thing, you’re bringing me back. This was years ago, but I remember when I was in college, I had a couple buddies and we started an accountability group where we just sort of challenged each other on a weekly regular basis, “Hey, did you do those things that you talked about?”

And in so doing, we built some really good habits and saw some cool results. And of them, his name is Jeremy, and I said, “You know what? I know Nike doesn’t recruit on our campus, but, like, you should just go for it and apply for an internship.” And so, he did, and he’s still working there. It’s a long career. Nike’s loving it.

And then I visited him out there in Oregon and I met people that he had formed another accountability group with. And I’d written down some of the principles that we were operating with. And so, they, too, were seeing really cool results and good habits and things in their world. And it really was tremendously powerful.

Like, “Huh, like some stuff I did has impacted Jeremy,” who is now in Oregon, partially because I said go for that internship. And then here’s more people that Jeremy is in the group with seeing awesome things. And it is among the top meaningful, feel good, emotional vibes around.

Deborah Heiser
It sure is because you know you mattered. And we need to know we mattered. That’s why, if we look at social media, those likes mean something to us. We need to feel like we matter. So even if those are throwaway things in certain things, in certain areas, it shows our craving for mattering, for relevancy, all of that.

So, what you just described is what we’re seeking from work. We want work validation. We want all of that. That all ties in together to how our emotions are. And just the acknowledging some of it, at least allows us. Like, you just told this story about somebody and how that made you feel. By doing that, it makes us want to do more. It makes us say, “Ooh, I’m either going to do what that person did or I’m going to translate that into something that I can do. I want that feeling again.” So that’s a bigger, better thing to strive for.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Well, Deborah, tell me, any other top things you want to make sure to mention before we hear about your favorite things?

Deborah Heiser
I would tell everyone, look to your left and look to your right, you’re probably looking at a mentor. And if they aren’t right now, you can either be mentoring them or they can be mentoring you at some point. So, think of every single person you meet as a potential mentor or mentee.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Thank you. Well, now could you share your favorite quotes, something you find inspiring?

Deborah Heiser
I think the favorite quote is, “Mentors change lives. Mentors change the world.” And I think that it’s because that really is true.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Deborah Heiser
My favorite book has always been Marie Curie, her autobiography, because she was somebody who did something that was completely new and unique, and kept following her passion, even though it was at a time when it was very difficult and women weren’t in leadership positions and she just did it.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Deborah Heiser
I’m old school, I use this.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, a notebook.

Deborah Heiser
And that, I’ve never given up. I would suggest to anybody that, you know, structure is such an important part of our work day. Whatever modern tools you can use to get that, use it. It makes a difference because each one of these things that you can check off makes you feel like a winner throughout the day.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Deborah Heiser
I think that my favorite habit is walking every single day.

Pete Mockaitis
Lovely. And is there a key nugget you share that really connects and resonates with folks, you hear them quoting it back to you often?

Deborah Heiser
I hear people talking about look to your left, look to your right. Lateral mentoring is something that has resonated with individuals, and I get that over and over again.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Deborah Heiser
I’d point them to my website, DeborahHeiser.com. I’m on LinkedIn. I write for Psychology Today. You can find me there. I have a Substack, “The Right Side of 40.” And you can find my book, The Mentorship Edge, anywhere you get books.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Deborah, thank you.

Deborah Heiser
Thank you.

1104: Exploring the Timeless Principles of Influence through a Christian Lens with Brian Ahearn

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Brian Ahearn shares his strategies for people looking to create ethical and meaningful change–both at work and at home.

You’ll Learn

  1. How modern psychology and the Bible support each other
  2. How to build instant rapport with anyone
  3. The master key to cementing your authority

About Brian

Brian Ahearn is the Chief Influence Officer at Influence PEOPLE. An international trainer and consultant, he specializes in applying the science of influence in everyday situations. He is one of only a dozen individuals in the world who holds the Cialdini Method Certified Trainer designation. 

Brian’s first book, Influence PEOPLE: Powerful Everyday Opportunities to Persuade that are Lasting and Ethical, was named one of the Top 100 Influence Books of All Time by BookAuthority. His LinkedIn courses have been viewed by more than 400,000 people around the world.

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

  • Strawberry.me. Claim your $50 credit and build momentum in your career with Strawberry.me/Awesome
  • Vanguard. Give your clients consistent results year in and year out with vanguard.com/AUDIO
  • Quince. Get free shipping and 365-day returns on your order with Quince.com/Awesome
  • Cashflow Podcasting. Explore launching (or outsourcing) your podcast with a free 10-minute call with Pete.

Brian Ahearn Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Brian, welcome back!

Brian Ahearn
It’s great to be back, Pete. Nice to see you.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s good to see you, and you shared earlier that you are now a grandpa.

Brian Ahearn
Yes, it’s so much better than people tell you. They tell you all these great things. The way I would equate it is people can tell you about falling in love. But once you fall in love, it’s so much better than anybody can describe, and grandparenting is the same way.

Pete Mockaitis
Awesome. Well, I’ve decided to chat about your latest book, Influenced from Above: Where Faith and Influence Meet. Tell us, what’s the story here?

Brian Ahearn
Well, the story is a continuation of the book I wrote called The Influencer: Secrets to Success and Happiness. And it follows that main character, John Andrews, and he’s about 18 months into his retirement and he’s feeling a little empty. He’s had a great life. He’s done really well in business but he’s feeling a little bored, like, “There has to be more to life than just enjoying the fruits of my labor.”

And he, ultimately, gets involved with his church in a community center building project. And he has to begin to straddle the line of not only what helped him succeed in business, but also dealing with a faith-based community. And through his studies and interactions, he begins to see this connection between Cialdini’s principles of influence and biblical tenets.

And so, the story fleshes that out with a lot of different characters and some twists and turns and things like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, intriguing. So biblical tenets, well, first of all, let’s address that right up front. For folks who aren’t so much into Christianity, or any faith tradition, do you see value in this book for them as well?

Brian Ahearn
Yes, because so many of the things that are talked about are timeless in terms of, they’ve been around as long as humanity. One example we know about reciprocity, if I do a good turn for you, you feel a sense of obligation to want to do something for me. That’s been around as long as human beings have been around.

Jesus said, “It’s better to give than receive,” and, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” so he was really talking about reciprocity. So, I think that the storyline will help people really see, whether they want to talk about biblical connections or, more generally, spiritual connections, I think that they will see that so many of the things that Cialdini and other social scientists have proven, via research and experiments, that these things have been talked about for thousands of years by very wise people.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, then. So, these principles of influence are fantastic, and we’ve chatted about them a couple of times in the show, as well as we had Bob Ciadini himself also speaking to them. So, could you unpack a little bit about some of the extra ancient perspectives on each of them?

Brian Ahearn
To start with, as we were discussing before we jumped on air, what spurred this book on was my daughter’s question. She had seen me present here in Columbus, Ohio many, many years ago. And we had lunch and we had a great discussion about what I had shared. And then she asked this question, she said, “Dad, what I want to know is where’s God in all this? Where does he fit into the psychology that you are teaching people?”

And it was just an off-the-cuff conversation, and that was the genesis for the idea of the book. But one of the things I remember telling her, I said, “Abigail, in business, we may not talk about love. But if we employ this principle of liking the right way, we get pretty close to it. When we’re not looking to get people to like us, just so we can get them to say yes and move our agenda forward, when we instead focus on coming to like the people that we’re with, that’s what changes everything.”

Because, you know, Pete, the more that you see that, “Hey, this guy, Brian, he really does seem to care about me,” that’s what opens you up to whatever I might ask. But, at the same time, because I’m getting to know and like you, I do want what’s best for you. And so, we’ve really gone from transactional to relational in terms of our interaction. And, to me, that’s getting pretty close to love.

Love is about doing what is best for others, even at a sacrifice to yourself. And so, we can get pretty close if we choose to engage this principle of liking the right way. And then it transforms our giving, right? So, when we talk about reciprocity and I do a good turn for you and you feel like you should do something for me, but I’m not just doing something to get you to do something in return.

Because I’ve come to know and like you, now I really want what’s best for Pete. And so, therefore, I’m looking for ways to genuinely help you. And even if it’s not the right thing, there’s grace coming from you because you know that I like you and care for you and that I’m really trying to help you. I just may not understand exactly the best way to do it in that moment, but that’s the kind of thing that transforms the relationship.

And so, our conversation just started going down the line, talking about these different principles and why coming to know and like somebody, in other words, getting close to that love, really can begin to transform how we interact, how we do business, and how we form relationships.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, I’d like to go into some depth with each of the six principles there. So, we’ve touched a bit about reciprocity.

Brian Ahearn
We could talk about unity.

Pete Mockaitis
Unity?

Brian Ahearn
Yeah, unity. Unity is one of the relationship building principles. And so, it goes deeper even than the principle of liking.

So, when we know that there’s unity there, in other words, when we have a shared identity or a deep bond, that transcends liking. And the interesting thing about unity is we will do things for people that we’re unitized with, that we might not even do for some of our closest friends. I mean, you take, for example, if somebody needs a kidney, we’re probably going to help a family member first and foremost because we’re genetically wired to help our species go on.

And that is very self-sacrificing to do something like give a kidney to somebody else. You’re not looking for anything in return. But here’s the neat thing about unity is, when I’m helping you, Pete, and we have unity, it’s almost as if I’m helping myself. I mean, when I do things for my grandson, it does wonders for me, right? He is my flesh and blood relative and I will do anything for him. I will make any sacrifices for him.

And that’s the principle of unity, which I think really gets us even closer to love. Because, again, I said earlier, love is self-sacrificial. And another interesting thing about unity is we don’t always even have to like the person. But if we feel that deep sense of shared identity or bond, we are much more likely to do something to try to help that individual.

So now we’ve really gone deep in the relationship aspect, hopefully, starting with liking, but maybe discovering unity. And I think that transforms the relationships that we have on a personal and professional level.

Pete Mockaitis
Can we talk about some of the ways that unity comes about?

Brian Ahearn
Unity, first and foremost, by genetics, our flesh and blood, our family, we are naturally unitized with them. Another great example from my lifetime was my father who served in the Marines.

And one thing he said was, “I still value Marine friendships above all others, even if they weren’t from Vietnam. There’s an invisible bond that joins us forever. If a Marine has a need, others will step in and help. It must be the result of having gone through such terrible times together.”

So, my dad didn’t really know much about the principles that I teach, but he recognized there was this invisible bond, and that word bond is really significant to the point where if a Marine had a need, others step in. It doesn’t matter how well you know them. It doesn’t even matter if you like them, “They are one of us and, therefore, we will do whatever we have to for that individual.”

So, again, from my life that’s the best example that I’ve seen of the principle of unity outside of the family relationship.

Pete Mockaitis
And what’s interesting about that notion is that, in some sort of groups, some folks will experience it and others will not. Like, I’m thinking in terms of, if it’s a faith community, if it’s being an alumnus, alumna, from a university, it’s interesting. Like, sometimes we feel it and other times we don’t. What are the core drivers behind that?

Brian Ahearn
Well, I think the proximity and the closer that you are to people. So, your example of like a university, certain universities have great reputation. They do a really good job of making people who go to those universities feel something special and significant.

Certainly, if you and I went to the same university and graduated in the same class, we would probably feel a deeper sense of unity than if I had gone to school with somebody who graduated 10 years before or 10 years after. We’ll still have it. It may not be as significant because you and I would have gone through the same things at the same time, maybe had the same teachers, remembered the same things that were happening on campus that create an emotional bond for us.

So, yes, there will be times whether it’s organizations or faith-based communities where you’ll have a unity but you can have it even stronger.

Pete Mockaitis
Very good. And then how do you think about the principles of spirituality within that?

Brian Ahearn
Well, there’s a verse in the Bible where it says that there’s neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female. We are all one in Christ Jesus. So that’s what Christ was pointing his disciples toward, that there was a sense of unity, especially before his crucifixion. He was praying that they would be one as he is one with the Father.

And so, that’s really how faith, I think, comes in. Again, we’re seeing this, thousands of years before anybody was talking about a principle called unity. But people who were extremely wise and connected understood that that was extremely significant. If those disciples were unitized, they were much more likely to be there and support one another in what became for, I think, virtually all of them, except for the Apostle John. It led to their own self-sacrificial deaths.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, absolutely. All right. Now let’s hear some ancient depth and goodness associated with the principles of commitment and consistency.

Brian Ahearn
Well, with commitment, the Bible talks about, “Let your yes be yes and your no be no,” and don’t make vows that you cannot repay. So, again, to a personal consistency in that principle says that we feel an internal psychological pressure, but also external social pressure to be consistent in what we say and what we do.

So, first and foremost, if we are consistent, we generally feel better about ourselves, which is a huge driver. Nobody likes to feel bad about themselves. So, we work very hard to keep our word. But, nonetheless, we need to be taught that. From childhood we are taught about don’t lie and do what you say. And so, we begin to get that sense of how important it is to do what we said we would do.

Pete Mockaitis
And now, as you’re dropping some verses here, I’m forming some connections here. I’m thinking about, “The measure with which you measure will be measured out unto you.” So, we’ve got some sort of honesty, commitment, consistency, as well as reciprocity, it’s like, “Well, if you’re cheating others with bogus measurements, then, likewise, you might expect them to do so,” as well as in the “Our Father” prayer, “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us,” in similar format.

Brian Ahearn
Yeah, so in that case, we have been given something, and that is forgiveness. Now, God doesn’t need us to reciprocate that back toward him, but he encourages us to, then, freely give that to others because it was freely given to us. So, it is engaging reciprocity, but it’s more in the form of a pay-it-forward, “I’ve done this for you. I hope you’ll do this for others who are in need of this.”

And I think when we really start to come to the recognition that we do need forgiveness, then it becomes a lot easier to realize, “Well, other people are like me, and this has benefited me tremendously, this burden kind of taken off my shoulders. I should try to do the same and encourage others by being that kind of forgiving individual.”

And then, again, I am mirroring what Christ was teaching his disciples, “If you don’t forgive, how do you expect your heavenly father to forgive you if you won’t forgive those who’ve trespassed against you?”

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, and now perhaps a bigger question is, I think that it’s quite possible for folks to twist, to abuse the word in terms of thinking, “Oh, okay, so Brian says it’s all good according to God himself, to unload, rock and roll, with wild abandon, these influence principles.” What do you think are some of the key checks in terms of being genuinely ethical, moral, loving with the use of these things?

Brian Ahearn
I have an interesting quote in the beginning of the book, where I talk about that I don’t see faith and science as in conflict. I get excited when I see that science confirms what faith has talked about for thousands of years. And the example that I shared was from a book called Sway by Ori and Rom Brafman.

And they were talking about brain imaging studies that showed there were two distinct centers in our brain. One lights up, or is engaged, when we are doing things for an altruistic reason. The other is engaged when we are doing things for a reward. But never do the two things, or the two parts of that brain, engage at the same time.

In other words, you’re either doing it for an altruistic reason or you’re doing it for a reward. And that goes back to something that Jesus said too. He said, “You can’t serve God and mammon,” or money. “You will either love one or love the other. You can’t serve two masters.”

And so, when I read that study, I just thought, “Wow, this is so interesting that we were being encouraged.” And I know people might think, “Well, you know, I can do things to get a little reward. I’m okay with that.” It’s really about what you’re starting with, “Am I trying to truly benefit or help this individual regardless of what may come back to me or what it might cost me?” That’s really probably very close to the altruistic.

But if I’m doing something, like I could be giving a lot of money to a charity, wonderful for the charity, but am I doing it because I so believe in that or I’m doing it for a tax break? And we know a lot of people do things because they want the tax break. Well, you’ve just received your reward.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Or the influence or the cache or the praise, your name on something.

Brian Ahearn
Sure.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s intriguing. And then there’s also this notion, I’ve heard similarly with these brain studies, that under certain circumstances, the parts of our brain light up associated with sort of the using of tools and then people can sort of fall into that category, it’s like, “Oh, you are a means to my end.” And then that’s not such a great spot to be in.

Brian Ahearn
Yes, people aren’t tools. I look at them and I say, “They’re children of God, created in the image of God. And so, therefore, I should treat them as such.” And let me be clear about this, too. I am in no way perfect or even great at this. I mean, it is a process that you’re always going through. And sometimes you realize you could have done something differently with somebody.

I think the key to that is to just confess it, like, “Wow, I was really crappy there.” But at least confessing it, you may make a better choice the next time. But in terms of, I think if we engage, going back to liking and/or unity, if we engage it the right way, it starts to shift that individual as a means to an end, “Because I want to get the sale,” or whatever the case may be.

And I will give you an example that, many years ago, I have a client, they’ve been an awesome client, and as I was working with them, the person who’s the VP of sales, said, “Hey, I’m not sure there’s going to be any opportunity the way the economy is.” And I told him, I said, “That’s okay.” I said, “I really like you and I want to make sure we stay in touch.”

And so, we continued to do that. And after our daughter got married three and a half years ago, I sent an email, and said, “Hey, Abigail got married. It was one of the best days of my life so far,” and had a couple pictures. Well, he came back and said, “That is great.” He said, “I just got engaged. Would you come to Germany for our wedding?” I’m like, “Heck, yes. That would be incredible.”

So, Jane and I made our first trip to Central Europe and had a wonderful time. The wedding was incredible. Everything about it was great. So, our friendship got deeper at that point. And there were things that went on during the wedding, too, that I felt like connected us even more deeply.

Later, as we maintained our friendship and I did the natural, “Hey, you guys thinking about kids?” And then he said, “Yeah, but we’re going to have to try in vitro for certain reasons.” And I said, “You know what? Our daughter was born through in vitro.” I mean, now we are unitized because not very many people have gone through that process, but I was able to share with him the highs and lows and the success and the failures, and just be a friend to him.

By the grace of God, they’re pregnant. They’re going to have a little girl in December. But he and I, whether or not I ever do business with his company again, is almost irrelevant because of the connection and the friendship I have. But I also understand this, Pete, that if they have a need, they’ll probably turn to me because he knows I genuinely care about him as a person and I really care about the success of their organization as I’ve gotten to know about it and the individuals there.

So those are the kind of things, I think, that transform business and relationships.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, let’s hear some ancient perspective on authority.

Brian Ahearn
A great one with authority was they said Jesus didn’t speak like the scribes and the Pharisees. He spoke as one with authority. And how often we fall prey to the belief that we have to have positional authority. I mean, it helps if you have the corner office, for sure. But what means a lot more, what we stress when we talk about being an authority is being a trusted expert. Because your expertise and your trust can transcend any role that you have.

And, obviously, that’s what Christ had. He had the trust of the people and he had the expertise with the authority, and he proved that by not only what he was saying, but then he backed it up by doing, right? “Anybody can say, you know, go in peace and be healed. Okay, you don’t think I have the authority to do that? Let me show you I do. Get up and walk.” And the paralytic got up and walked.

So, he is the example. And then the disciples became examples of that too, as many of them did miraculous things in His name.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. And I’m thinking about, when you think about authority and trust, there are many ways that trust is subtly built and eroded, in terms of your interactions and just sort of the life you live and what people can see from that.

Especially, I think when it costs us something. I think there’s a great degree of moral authority that shows up when people say and do things for a higher good at their own cost or expense. And maybe because it seems somewhat rare, that I just think, “Okay, that person is awesome.”

Like, they have stature in my eyes, they have authority, and there’s sort of a halo effect that goes on, in terms of, I naturally believe the things they are telling me are true and can be relied upon because I have witnessed virtue from this person.

Brian Ahearn
Aristotle, I’ve often used this quote, he said, “Character may almost be called the most effective means of persuasion.” If we lose reputation because we’ve broken trust, it can destroy, I mean, you and I have lived long enough that we’ve seen this, it can destroy a lifetime of work. And so, therefore, we have to be very careful.

We don’t want to act like we’re walking on eggshells, but we have to be very careful about always doing right by people. And I always tell the people that I work with, “It’s not enough to tell the truth. We don’t hide the truth either.”

Because, Pete, if you knew that I was holding something back that was material to your decision-making, and then you made a decision and you would have made a different decision if you’d known that information, you will not be looking at me as a trustworthy person. You’ll be saying, “Brian, why didn’t you bring up this point?”

And for me to say, “Well, Pete, you didn’t ask,” is indefensible if I know that that would materially impact your decision. So, we tell the truth and we never hide the truth. And I think if we have that as a general way that we go through life, we are getting much closer to being that person of integrity that people will willingly trust.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, now let’s talk about some social proof.

Brian Ahearn
With social proof, it’s interesting that a lot of the things that are talked about in the Bible are kind of steering you away from social proof because, in following God, you are swimming upstream.

And we know that we can be influenced by other people, what many others are doing or what similar others are doing. And so, a lot of the time, we’re having to actually warn people against that. You know, it says that, “The way to destruction is broad and many are those who find it, but the way to life is narrow, and few are those that find it.”

So, that one’s that we have to be very sensitive to how we use it. And even in today’s day and age, quite often, people use social proof incorrectly. Example, if somebody said, if they were a teacher at a university, and they were to say to students, “You know, I just read a report that says 65% of students will cheat by the time they graduate. If I catch any of you cheating, I’ll have you down in the Dean’s office and get you expelled.”

But what I’ve just done there is I planted a seed, “Two out of every three students cheat at some point in their academic career?” And then, all of a sudden, somebody is stressed. They’ve got a lot of things going on, and, “Well, I’ll just do it this one time.” But I have, inadvertently, set the stage to make it easier for them cognitively to make that decision.

So, it’s a very interesting principle. We have to always utilize it to guide people in a direction that we want them to go. So, if two-thirds of students were cheating, but that same report said, “Cheating is on the decline,” I’m going to talk about the fact that cheating is on the decline, “You know, every year 10% fewer students are cheating,” or something like that, to try to get people thinking like, “Oh, this isn’t something I should try. This isn’t something I might get away with.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, social proof is just in us. We tend to follow the crowd. And so that’s a good caution there, is to highlight that. And then, I guess, in a way, there’s also a little bit of a streak in maybe some personalities that they want to be elite, rare, special, distinguished. And so, I think there may be some personality type. Or, what would you want to call it?

Brian Ahearn
Contrarian?

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. For that, a contrarian streak to them, were like, “Oh, well, then.” I think that’s people who like conspiracy theories, for example. I think that’s part of the appeal for them, it’s like, “Ooh, everyone is, the vast majority of people have the completely wrong idea, but I, and a few others, we really know what’s up here.” Although, I guess, in a way, that’s unity over there.

Brian Ahearn
Well, they can be unitized with that small group who believes as they believe, but they are also, in a sense, tapping into scarcity, “Everybody’s doing this, but this is the thing over here.” And, of course, that intrigues us. We are also naturally drawn to something that’s unique and different, rare, maybe not easily available. And so, it just piques our interest and, all of a sudden, you can take a step in that direction.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, any other thoughts on scarcity?

Brian Ahearn
With scarcity, that’s replete throughout the Bible too. We’re told to, as long as it is day to work, we don’t know when night is coming. The Apostle Paul talked about the return of Christ, “Nobody knows.” Even Jesus said, “Nobody knows the day or the hour except the Father.” That wasn’t to scare people, but it was to get them to think, “You know what, I don’t want this, whatever, to happen tomorrow and regret that I didn’t take action today.”

And so, it really, I think it’s there to incent us to always be looking to do the right thing, to live godly lives, to do right by others, to love them and things, because tomorrow is not guaranteed for anybody. And one of the worst things that we can do is be on the deathbed and think about all the stuff we didn’t do that we wish we had. So, I think it’s a good way to look at life.

Pete Mockaitis
Well said. Well, Brian, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention here?

Brian Ahearn
I think if people read the book, they’re going to start to see more deeply these connections, as John Andrews learns about these and has to deal with a faith-based community. It’s motivated differently than a secular community. And he’s dealing with trying to get donations and volunteers. He’s dealing with a city zoning board and the city council and having to also go there.

But in no case does he ever abandon one or the other. He’s always looking to say, “Okay, now that I understand that there seems to be this underpinning of these biblical tenets for these principles that have been so instrumental in my success in my career, how do I marry these two to be a more effective individual, whether I’m dealing with the secular or a faith-based community?”

Because in either case, we still, in large part, our success and happiness rests on getting people to say yes to us. But I hope people will see that we can go to a deeper level, a level that does right by people and allows us to feel really good about ourselves in the midst of that as well.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. Thank you. Well, now could you share a favorite book?

Brian Ahearn
Robert Cialdini’s book, Influence. And when Bob read the first draft of the book, he loved it. He said, “It’s totally unique.” He said, “I have never read anything that has tried to connect faith-based tenets to my principles.” And that was a huge compliment for me.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite habit?

Brian Ahearn
A favorite habit would certainly be working out. Every day, I’m up for 4:00-4:30 and go for a long walk, and then I come in and I work out for about 45 minutes and spend time stretching and try to get all that done by 6:00-6:15. So every day starts with that.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Brian Ahearn
First would be LinkedIn. And so, if anybody is finding this interesting, if they start following me or if they reach out to connect, they’re going to see something every day to help them learn a little bit more about how influence can help them in terms of their professional success and personal happiness.

The other would be my website, which is InfluencePeople.biz. There’s just a tremendous amount of information for people to really whet their appetite.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Brian Ahearn
Well, I’ll say two things. One is, this isn’t really so much of a challenge, but I do want to make people know that if they order the book, which comes out on October 21st, if they send an email to BookLaunch@InfluencePeople.biz, and they tell me the name of the second chapter, I will send them a free e-version of the book, The Influencer, so the prequel to this book. They’ll get that for free.

As far as what I want them to take away from this, I would hope that it gets people thinking more about these principles beyond just, “How can I get what I want?” I mean, that’s very important. It’s very important to succeed at your job and all the benefits that that can do for, like, college education, vacations, all those things. They’re wonderful. But there’s something that’s more important. And I hope that, having listened to this conversation, they might start thinking more deeply about that.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. Brian, thank you.

Brian Ahearn
You’re welcome. It’s always a pleasure to talk with you, Pete.

1076: Asking Better Questions to Forge Deeper Relationships with Mike Litton

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Mike Litton reveals his mindsets and questions that effortlessly deepen relationships.

You’ll Learn

  1. Why questions are your relationship superpower
  2. The magic questions that get people to open up
  3. Why to ask the scary questions

About Mike

Mike has over 33 years of experience in real estate, finance, and investing! He is passionate about being a father, a teacher, a Realtor, an investor, and a leader!

Mike is currently a broker associate, podcast host, mortgage loan originator, coach, entrepreneur, investor and adjunct instructor real estate.

His podcast, The Mike Litton Experience has been listened to over 3,350,000 times. It is heard in 64 countries world wide. Has over 342 episodes and has an impactful listening percentage of 82%. All in less than two years!

Resources Mentioned

Thank you, Sponsors!

Mike Litton Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Mike, welcome!

Mike Litton
Thanks, bud. Great to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yes, it is. I am excited to be chatting questions, something I know you’re deeply passionate about. Could you maybe kick us off with a story of a time, a question, was, oh, so transformational?

Mike Litton

Well, it’s actually a series of questions and it’s one of my favorite stories. I just recently was hired by Southwestern College, a local college here, as an adjunct professor or adjunct instructor for real estate. And 20 some years ago, I was in National City at their adult education center. I was teaching a class on how to succeed in real estate.

There were 45 people in the room. And there was a young man in the corner with his hat on sideways, and every time I said something, he said something to his neighbor, and I got all of that I could stand, because I’m a very patient person, it took less than five minutes. And I went back there and stood over him with my arms folded, just like his were, and I said, “So, I get the impression you don’t think I know what I’m talking about.” He said, “I think you’re full of…” fill in the blank, right? It wasn’t a nice thing.

Pete Mockaitis

Poo-poo.

Mike Litton
Right. Exactly. And I said, “How about if I give you an example right here, live?” “Oh, I’d love to see this.” And so, I walked up front and I picked out the hottest girl in the room. And I walked up to her and I stuck my hand out, and I said, “Hi, I’m Mike.” And she said, “Hi, I’m Missy.”

And I said, “Missy, have we ever met before?”

She said, “No.”

I said, “Can I ask you a question?”

She said, “Sure.”

I said, “Where were you born?”

She said, “Chula Vista.”

I said, “Great. Did you grow up in Chula Vista?”

She said, “Yeah.”

I said, “What was your favorite thing about growing up in Chula Vista?”

She said, “The beach.”

I said, “Great. What was your favorite thing about the beach?”

She said, “The ocean.”

I said, “What was your favorite thing about the ocean?”

She said, “Swimming in the ocean.”

I said, “Why is that?”

And she said, “Because I never feel as free as I do when I’m swimming in the ocean.”

And so, I asked her, I said, “Missy, we’ve never met before. You and I have known each other now less than a minute. Do you feel closer to me than you did less than a minute ago?”

She goes, “Closer? I’m ready to marry you.”

Okay? Now this was this kid in the corner, we never heard another thing from him. He hung on every word after that. But here’s the thing. All I did was ask her questions about her, and then I asked her questions about the answer she gave me, right?

And so, what we’re not doing nowadays is we’re not staying curious about the people around us, the people we’re on the phone with, the people we’re working with, that kind of thing. And so, my big thing, I was just at Stanford a couple of weeks ago, giving a toast to a public speaking class up there. And I was the guest of their instructor.

And I, basically, told them, they gave me two minutes and you cannot go over it. It’s an absolute sin if you go over two minutes. So, I got up and I said, “Listen, it takes me 30 minutes to introduce myself. So, very quickly, everywhere I go, I try to add value. So, let me give you two items of value. Number one, if you ever have stage fright as a speaker, love the audience more than you love yourself, and your stage fright will go away.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right.

Mike Litton
“If you care more about them getting the message and you’re teaching them than you do about how you look doing it, you’re going to be fine. The stage fright will go away. Next, I’m going to suggest to you that you do what I suggested both of my kids do, who are now 25 and 27. And what it was, was take out a word processor and the largest font you can, on top, type out, blank document, type out, ‘Stay in curiosity.’”

“At the bottom, ‘Stay out of judgment.’ Okay. Print it up and post it on a wall somewhere where you see it every day when you’re working, right in front of where you’re working. So, when you’re on the phone and you’re working, you remember to stay curious about the people that you’re on the phone with, about the world around you, about everything that’s going on. If you do that, your life will be so rich, you won’t recognize it.”

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, Mike, that’s beautiful, right off the bat. And what’s so fun there is that series of questions, it’s not complicated, it doesn’t require much memorization, but we’ve managed to go from basic facts – fact, “I was born in this location,” – down into something that is deeply meaningful to her very quickly.

And, in so doing, yes, you naturally have good vibes towards the person because now you are summoning for them one of their most meaningful memories, and that feels good. And you were the one who made those good feelings happen in one flat.

Mike Litton
Yeah, she had a state change, what we call a state change. She looked like she was getting euphoric when she was talking about how free she feels swimming in the ocean. And that’s what this is about. It’s about being curious enough about the person that you’re in front of, and then it’s about asking them questions about what they just answered. They’re called piggyback questions.

And all you’re doing is you’re caring enough to ask. You’re caring, right? So, after the class, she came up to me, and she said, “You know, Mr. Litton, when I said I was ready to marry you, I was sort of half kidding.” And I said, “Okay.”

She said, “I’m 18 years old and I’ve stopped dating.”

And I said, “May ask you why?”

And she said, “Yeah.” She said, “The boys my age don’t ask me about me. They only talk about themselves.” And she said, “And I’m just sick of it.” She said, “You’re the only man that’s shown an interest in me other than my father.” That’s not good, okay?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that is a sad commentary in terms of the state of our society. And also, call me optimistic, a fantastic opportunity for all of us to show that interest, curiosity, and those questions, and great things happen.

Mike Litton
It happens everywhere you go. I went to a party the other day with my wife, and I don’t think she enjoys going to parties with me because I become the person that everybody wants to talk to. And the reason for it is I’m curious about them. I ask them about them, right?

And then another person comes along and we ask them about them. And then another person comes along and, all of sudden, we’ve got five or six, seven people standing there and we’ve got five, six, seven live stories. And what happens is that group of five or six, seven people, all of a sudden, realize that they have something in common with this other person, “Oh, my uncle went to Notre Dame.”

“Oh, my goodness. Did you know so and so?”

“Oh, so-and-so went to Illinois.”

“Oh, did you know so-and-so?”

“Oh, by the way, my brother was in AAU basketball. Did you have coach so-and-so?” You with me? And, all of a sudden, it’s, like, you cannot believe how connected we are until we start talking about people’s life stories. And that’s what we do with our podcast, is we have our guests share their life stories with us.

The cool thing about it for our listeners is they get an opportunity, and they’ve shared this with us. They get an opportunity to connect with our guests because of something that happened in their childhood or something happened in their life that they were able to connect with, and something similar, right?

We’re all looking to connect. We’re all looking to find something that we have in common. And if all we do is ask about the person we’re talking to on the phone, or ask about the person that we’re standing in front of, or ask about the person that we’re teaching, or ask about the seminar attendee that we’re talking to from the stage, we will engage them and we’ll engage all the people around them.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s beautiful. Well, so can I hear some of your favorite questions? Any do’s and don’ts as we navigate this path?

Mike Litton
So, some of my favorite questions are, “What’s your favorite thing about X?” “So, what was your favorite thing about growing up where you grew up?” And one of the things we always ask on our podcast was, “What was one of your favorite things?” or “Who is the most influential person to you growing up?”

And they open up. They become that kid that was being influenced, all of a sudden. And it opens up a Pandora’s box, in a good way, right, in terms of all the different stories and all the different things that come to mind and that they remember. And it’s a really, really cool way to go.

So, one of the things that I’ll do, I’m in real estate, when I go to list of property, I’ll walk in and I’ll ask the owner, I’ll just ask him, I’ll say, “What’s your favorite thing about your house? What’s your favorite thing about your neighborhood? What’s your favorite thing about the city you live in?” Right?

Because I want to know, legitimately, I’m the one that’s helping to sell their property. I want to know, when a buyer calls, “This is their favorite thing about the house. This is their favorite thing about their neighborhood. This is their favorite thing about their city.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Yeah, that’s so good because, otherwise, it’s quite likely it could blow right past you. Like, if you were to ask me, I would say, we’ve got these giant screened, cedar sliding doors on the back patio, which I’ve never really seen before. It’s kind of novel.

And it’s just so fun in the patio, you could have it open, you can have it closed. And when I close, I always like to just give a nice, deep smell of that cedar on both sides of the door at the same time. It’s my weird little ritual. But it gets me in a groove of savoring the little things, like the outdoor view and the feeling of, “Oh, I could enjoy sun and also be shaded in a patio at the same time and the smell.”

Mike Litton
Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
And so, that is such a cool little thing that you could convey to a potential buyer, it’s like, “Oh, hey, get a load of this. The cedar, you can still smell it.” And that’s just engaging another sense, and, hey, who knows, that might make the difference in terms of nudging them over the edge, like, “Yeah, let’s make an offer on this one.”

Mike Litton
Yeah. Well, the thing that seems to sell houses is the neighborhood. And so, they’ll tell you about their favorite neighbor, two doors down, that does a barbecue every summer, and they always invite the neighbors over, and yada, yada, yada. You with me?

And so, the thing that sells it is the relatability and how friendly everybody is in the neighborhood and all that kind of thing, and they watch out for each other. There are features in the house that’ll help sell the house, but, notoriously, the thing that they grab onto is the neighborhood.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s powerful. Okay. What are some other favorites?

Mike Litton
Well, one of the things that I love to do is I love to ask people what it is that they do for a living, and then why. In other words, “How is it that you became a pilot?” “How is it that you became a doctor?” “How is it that you became a nurse?” whatever it is they do. And, usually, there’s a great story behind it. They had a dad that was a surgeon. They had an uncle that was their favorite, that was a nurse.

And we’ll talk about kind of what their favorite thing is about that particular relative or that particular person that had that impact on them. And it’s really a lot of fun to just get to know people, right? Like, “Where are you from? Where were you born?” Especially, if they have an accent, right, it’s like, “Wow, what state is that accent from?” you know, right?

And, all of a sudden, it’s a conversation that you’re having where they’re now teleporting themselves back to when they were growing up and back to where it is that they came from and what their favorite food is and all those things, all those wonderful memories.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s super. Well, could you also share with us what are some not-so great questions, like, “Yeah, I’ve tried them out and they don’t really go anywhere or do much”?

Mike Litton
One of the things that I don’t ever do is I don’t ever ask people why they chose something, “So, why did you choose to live here?” “Why did you choose to use that particular service provider?” “Why did you choose to do this?” Right?

The reason for it is why tends to get them on the defensive. They tend to feel like that they need to defend whatever decision it was that they made, okay? So, why is something that I would avoid. Now, if you really want to connect with somebody on a deeper level, and you’ve done your prep work to an extent where you’ve asked them about them long enough, you can go to the why question, but you have to get to a place to where you’ve earned it, right?

You have to get to a place of trust. And then it’s like, “You know, I’m just curious, given the fact that you do this, I’m just fascinated by why you would choose to do that.” Now that is a different conversation. That’s less accusatory. That’s more curiosity involved. And people love it. Absolutely love it, Pete. When you’re curious about them, they love it.

And as much as parents and grandparents will tell you that they’re their grandparents and their kids are their favorite subject, it’s actually them. They’re actually their favorite subject. They just won’t tell you because that’s not the politically correct thing to do, right? But they’re literally dying to tell you their story. You just have to care enough to ask.

Pete Mockaitis

When you said they’re literally dying to tell you their story, I saw a study and, hopefully, we could find it in the show notes, is that folks were, in fact, willing to receive less money in an experiment if they had the opportunity to self-disclose, to say something about themselves. And so, we use the word literally, literally its value can have dollar signs attached to it.

Mike Litton
Well, here’s a question for you. What is it that makes dollars valuable?

Pete Mockaitis
You know what comes to mind is a snippet from an episode of the Simpsons in which Homer, he’s trying to find a donut, I think, under the couch and he goes, “Aww, $20.” And his brain says, “Wait, $20 can buy many donuts.” He says, “Explain.” “Money can be exchanged for goods and services.” So, I guess that’s your dictionary definition of why, “Why money is valuable.” It can be exchanged for goods and services.

But if we dig into the theme of the day, the curiosity and what it means to individual people, it’s quite fascinating. And my mom worked as a, she was the CEO of the Education Personnel Federal Credit Union in Danville, Illinois, so all my teachers banked with my mom at the Credit Union, which is an interesting experience. So, there was a constant conversation loop between the two in there. And she’ll tell you it was quite fascinating. Everyone’s views of money could be so different, and yet strongly held.

Mike Litton
So, let me ask you this. What’s the difference between their views?

Pete Mockaitis
So she would say, for example, that you could take any facet of their relationship to money and it’d be very different. Like, for some folks, like debt, they won’t touch it, “No, no, no. That’s scary stuff. Don’t want to go there.” Others, totally comfortable with it and totally comfortable with their bankruptcy afterwards.

Mike Litton
Is it possible to say that their value of money comes from emotion?

Pete Mockaitis
Probably, yeah, because money does something for you that you care about, whether you call it freedom or responsibility or…

Mike Litton
Accomplishment.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah.

Mike Litton
Right? Okay. So, if you feel accomplished by getting X amount of money for something, and you’re willing to take less if you’re able to tell your story, how does that equate? It’s because the value of getting more diminishes because you’re now closer to that person and you’ve now had an opportunity to express who you are. Does that make sense?

Pete Mockaitis
I hear you.

Mike Litton
We’re emotional creatures. We buy with emotion. We justify with logic, okay?

Pete Mockaitis

Yes, I buy that.

Mike Litton
That’s exactly the reason. That’s exactly the reason why that study says what it says, because if all you do is get to know somebody and get them to a place to where they’re comfortable, and they’re comfortable talking with you, all of a sudden, they’d be willing to take less. All of a sudden, they’d be willing to work with you.

All of a sudden, they’d be willing to figure out a way to sell you whatever it is they’re trying to sell you, be it a car, house, whatever, simply because they want you to have it. Why? Because you cared enough to ask. You cared enough to show an interest in them.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, you’re bringing me back to my most recent substantial purchase was a hefty custom-made studio door. And I noticed on the website, it said there’s a 10% discount, but I had started working with the sales guy, Kyle, who was amazing. And so, he gives me the price, then I mentioned, “Well, you know, I also noticed that there was this discount from the website. And it’d be great if we could apply that, but don’t do it if that impacts your compensation any way, because I want you to earn the entirety of it.”

So, there I was thinking, “Kyle is so awesome. I would like a lower price, but not if it impacts his money.” So, he’s like, “Oh, we could do it.” I was like, “It’s awesome. Thanks. Win-win.”

Mike Litton
Yeah, there it is.

Pete Mockaitis
In action.

Mike Litton
Exactly, in action, yeah. That’s cool. Yeah, so what you want to try to do, and this is again, questions are incredibly important, but they’re only important if you’re using them strategically. Okay. And the best way to use questions strategically is to stay in curiosity, stay out of judgment, get to know people.

I tell people all the time, I’m the king of the stupid question. Why? Because I’ll ask questions you won’t ask. I’ll ask questions the person down the street won’t ask. Why? Because they prejudge those questions. They’re in judgment, not in curiosity. I don’t prejudge questions. I just ask. And if it’s inappropriate, people will tell me, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, can you give us a couple examples of a question that some may say, “That’s too dumb,” but you go there and it works out for you?

Mike Litton
Well, a lot of times, you’ll have people that will tell you about some accomplishment. They’ll tell you about something that they’ve done. And at the end of it, I always end up turning around and asking them, “So, let me ask you a question. What was it about that that made you feel accomplished? What was it about that that you’re so proud of?”

Most people won’t go there. Most people won’t want to go to a place where they dig a little bit where somebody’s concerned, and they certainly won’t ask them if this person has had some sort of tragedy in their life. So, I interviewed a lady yesterday who has been through a lot of tragedy. She was born in Zimbabwe, grew up in Zimbabwe, moved to the UK. Had all kinds of interesting things happen.

As a 20-year-old girl, she spent the night in a phone booth, you know, those red phone booths in London. She spent the night in there because she had nowhere to go. She was homeless that night, and it was because of an immigration thing and some sort of snafu and this and that.

And so, I asked her, I said, “So, how did that make you feel?” Well, most people won’t go there because they don’t want to know how it’s going to make her feel, and they know it’s probably going to cause her to cry.

Now, if she’s not willing to tell me, she can always say, “I’m not willing to go there,” okay? But that’s not what happened. She ended up telling me how it made her feel, and it helped to motivate her to where she is today, where she’s an amazing success, but she’s an amazing success because of all the things that she went through in her life. Makes sense?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. I love that a lot. And what’s so interesting is people are scared to ask those questions. They don’t ask those questions. And we have this fear that there’s going to be a bad outcome. And yet, as I think about some of my darkest moments, you know, my dad died when I was a teenager, I got punched in the face randomly in Chicago.

I really value and appreciate the people who do ask those follow-up questions, because I feel like they really care because, and it’s rare and noteworthy and special. And I might be reliving a bit of some sadness or unpleasantness, but, in a way, it’s more positive than negative because I feel cared about and I’m able to confront something with, like, a helper, a teammate, someone on my side.

Mike Litton
And it’s cathartic. It’s cathartic. If you keep it inside, if you keep it in here, it feels, it just festers and it gets worse and worse and worse. And pretty soon, it feels like it’s this big and it’s heavy and it’s obtrusive and all that, right? When all you have to do is get that person to tell you about it and tell you how it makes them feel.

Now, are they going to cry? Typically. Possibly. Right? Are there going to be tears? Yeah. Are they going to get emotional? Yeah. I don’t want to make people cry, but I also don’t want people to keep that bottled up. It’s not healthy. It’s not healthy to not talk about that. And I’d be willing to bet you that with what happened with your dad, that that made you a better father. I’d be willing to bet you that it did. And I would ask you that question.

So, let me ask you a question, losing your dad when you did, how did that affect you and your mission as a dad? And then, all of sudden, it’s like, “Huh, here comes the flood works.” Because it really does affect you in a major way. And it’s one of those things that is sort of a pivot point in your life, painful, but a pivot point in your life.

And you can then pivot in that conversation to all the wonderful things that you’re doing for your kids. All the wonderful things that you’re doing as a dad. All the wonderful things you’re doing as a leader in the community, because that’s what your dad would have done. Does that make sense? That’s everything.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, it really does. And we’re talking about questions and I just want to say the answer, because, sure enough, case and point, this is the stuff working, and it does make me want to let my kids know, absolutely, every day, and clearly that they’re loved. Like, I’ll say, “Did we forget good morning hugs and kisses?” you know? “Well, let’s go ahead and do that now,” because you never know. Today may be our last day.

And so, I would like that to be unmissable in terms of like, “Oh, if I exited, that would be very clear to them, “My dad absolutely loved me.” Or, in terms of just my own health, it’s like, “Hey, as a 41-year-old man, things like cholesterol kind of matter. So, got to take care of some business.”

Mike Litton
Yeah. And, you know, there are all kinds of positives that came from you losing your dad as early as you did. And the way that you go about exploring that is by asking questions about how did that help you. What are the top three things that you do today that you would not have done if that hadn’t happened? Those types of things.

And so, all of sudden, you’re now looking at this, and you’re looking at it in terms of, “Wow, this really did happen for a reason. This really is something that’s had a major impact in my life.” And the best thing about it is, if I’m interviewing you, the audience now has an opportunity to share with you in what that experience was like, and what your life post that event has been.

Pete Mockaitis
Fantastic stuff. Well, Mike, I’m curious, any other do’s and don’ts when it comes to the question game?

Mike Litton
You know, the one thing that I want people to understand is the person that’s asking the questions in the conversation is the person that’s controlling it. So, you’re the person that’s controlling the conversation, right? And it’s not about being a control freak or any of that kind of stuff, but it is about where you take the conversation.

Because, ultimately, if you’re asking questions and you’re talking to somebody, what you’re doing, basically, is you’re helping them get to where you know they need to be, okay? And I’ll give you an example. So, I interviewed a lady that I call my CEO whisperer.

And the reason I call her that is because she worked for one of the most awesome CEOs ever in the business in corporate America for 25 years. And he was somebody who was very authentic and he was very approachable. He was very sort of normal, right, where he would go in and he would sit with somebody that was two, three, four levels, five levels down from him.

He would go in, sit with them, close the door, take out a pad and a pen, and he’d ask them, “How are you doing? How is the company doing for you? How is the company helping you to get to what your goals are? How can we do better? How can we win with you?” Okay? Now all of these questions are important, and he would listen to the answers. And the most important thing is he would write down the responses.

What that did, Pete, was that validated them. And they connected with this man on a deeper level. The fact of the matter is this, there’s a survey or study that just came out where 86% of workers in America are detached, disengaged from their jobs – 86%. If all we do as leaders is, go sit with our people, and just connect with them.

Just sit down with them and ask them those questions, “How are you? How are we doing as a company for you? Are we helping you as much as we can to reach your goals? What do you think tomorrow looks like? How can we succeed together? How can we win with you?” All these types of wonderful questions that helped that CEO to connect with that person that works for them, right, “What are you seeing on the front lines that I need to know about because I’m up in the C-suite?” All of those things.

So, I’ll give you an example. Let’s say that your company has your board of directors, has decided that they want to take sales from point A to point B, so from here to here, okay? Up, up, right. And you go and sit with the people that work for you. The best thing you can do is walk in, and say, “Look, the board of directors has tasked me as the CEO to get our sales from here to here. What part in that ascension or that increase in sales can you help us with? What active part can you have in this? Great. Tell me more.”

And it’s one of those things where they’re going to, literally, sit with you, and they’re going to share with you how they can help that company succeed. Imagine you do that a hundred times with a hundred employees. What do you think next year’s going to look like?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, awesome.

Mike Litton
You with me? And they’ll, literally, say to you, out of their own mouths, because when you speak it, it’s real. You know this. When you speak it, it’s real. They’ll, literally, tell you out of their own mouths in their own words, “This is what I can do. This is what I will do.”

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah. And it’s fun in terms of…

Mike Litton
It’s absolutely fun.

Pete Mockaitis
“Well, you know, I’m actually pretty good at this thing. So, would it help if I did that?” And they say, “Well, yeah, it would.” And they say, “Well, great because that’s what I like to do anyway, and I get to make a contribution at the same time. That’s just a good workday.”

Mike Litton
“And I get to build a deeper relationship with the guy that I work for.”

Pete Mockaitis
Super.

Mike Litton
It’s all a plus.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Mike, any final thoughts before we hear a few of your favorite things?

Mike Litton
Just be curious. Stay in curiosity. Stay out of judgment.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, then let’s now hear, can you tell us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Mike Litton
What you speak is real. If you speak it, it’s real.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite study or experiment or piece of research?

Mike Litton
Yes. The 7-38-55 Rule. And it’s amazing to me how few people know about the 7-38-55 Rule. Are you familiar with it?

Pete Mockaitis
I think you’re going to talk about the impact of our words versus tone versus nonverbal.

Mike Litton
Yeah. So, you do know about it. So, 7% of human communication is the words that you choose, like loquacious versus talkative, right? So, 7% is your vocabulary. Thirty-eight percent of your ability to communicate to another human being is the way you say the words that you choose, your tonality, your energy, your congruency, your commitment, all of it, dedication, all of it, okay?

Fifty-five percent, more than half of your ability to communicate with another human being is body language. It’s how you use your physical body. It’s your facial gestures. It’s your gestures. It’s everything. It’s how you carry yourself. What’s interesting about it is 100% of your ability to communicate with another human being is face to face. That’s why video is such a big deal.

But if you look at what we call the telephone quotient, it’s 7 plus 38, it’s 45. So, 45%, less than half of your ability to communicate with another human being is verbal. So, it’s over the phone, right? So, that’s why when you’re making phone calls, we suggest that you stand in front of a mirror, that you stand up, that you smile because people can hear you smiling over the phone.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, very good. And a favorite book?

Mike Litton
Nobody Is Coming to Save You by a guy by the name of Scott Mann.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite habit?

Mike Litton
Asking questions.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key Mike Litton-original sound bite that people quote back to you often?

Mike Litton
Mike Time. So, when I owned my real estate office, it was a very large real estate office. I had hundreds of agents working with me. I would get a phone call from them, and I still do, even now that we don’t own it anymore. The agents that used to work with us would call me up and go, “I just need five minutes of Mike Time.”

And what that meant was they had gone out into the world; the world had beat them up and they just needed five minutes with somebody who was sane and somebody who was positive and somebody who would listen to them. And that was me.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Mike Litton
Probably LinkedIn. Just look up Mike Litton at LinkedIn. And then I have this podcast called The Mike Litton Experience. You can Google it, where anywhere you get your podcasts – Spotify, Apple iTunes, Amazon, anywhere you get your audio. And then, also, we have a YouTube channel, “The Mike Litton Experience.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Mike Litton
Stay in curiosity. Stay out of judgment.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Mike, thank you.

Mike Litton
Thank you, bud. This was fun.

1052: Building Better Relationships through Radical Listening with Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener

By | Podcasts | One Comment

Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener shares powerful insights on how to listen well and deepen your connections.

You’ll Learn

  1. The hidden barriers to listening
  2. Why we should interrupt more
  3. The secret to handling disagreements better

About Robert

Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener is a researcher, author, and consultant with 75 peer-reviewed academic articles and has over 27,000 citations. His previous books include The Upside of Your Dark Side (New York Times Bestseller, 2014), and the 2007 PROSE Award winner, Happiness. He has presented keynotes to Lululemon, Deloitte, Humana, AARP, The World Bank, and others. In 2024, Thinkers50 named Robert one of the “50 Most Influential Executive Coaches in the World.” He lives in Portland, Oregon, where he enjoys drawing and rock climbing.

Resources Mentioned

Dr. Robert Biswas-Diener Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Robert, welcome.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Thank you, Pete, so much for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
I’m excited to hear about your wisdom. And you’ve got the coolest nickname ever, one I think I would like for myself. You’re known as the Indiana Jones of positive psychology. So, I’m imagining rolling boulders, whips, all kinds of adventures. Tell me, what’s the source of this nickname? And can you give us an amazing adventure and discovery to back it up?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. Like all nicknames, I did not give it to myself. That is important for everyone.

Pete Mockaitis
“They call me T-Bone.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
Everyone should know that right up front. One of my colleagues said this about me because, unlike other psychologists, I wasn’t just running studies in the laboratory with college students. I was going out in the field, and pretty far field. I was studying happiness, among other things, with the Amish, for example, with Maasai tribal people. I stayed in the very Northern tip of Greenland where I was working with Inuit hunters. So, I spent several years, almost five years sort of traveling the world and studying happiness.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool. All right. Thank you. So, we’re talking about your book, Radical Listening, and I’d love to get to kick us off with an inspiring story of someone who upgraded their listening game and saw phenomenal results coming from that.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Yeah, absolutely. There is a woman I interviewed, in fact, for this book, she’s a very senior leader, works in an international organization. In fact, they own a bunch of subsidiaries, which means their footprint is across industry, across linguistic groups, across cultures, across national boundaries.

And she always thought of herself as a fantastic listener, but then she realized, “I really can’t even understand the language of some of these people. I don’t understand the cultural fabric or context of many of the people I’m trying to listen to. And perhaps most importantly, my role suggests that I’m not even interested in what they’re interested in.”

So, she’s thinking big strategic ideas, and they’re often looking at just sort of day-to-day operations. And she realized that she kind of just fundamentally can’t understand them, that her role is an obstacle to listening. And one of the things she did was recruited listening ambassadors to listen on her behalf and become sort of like Rosetta Stones or translators of the line worker up to the senior leadership.

And so, the thing I think is so remarkable about that is not just that she recruited these ambassadors, which is kind of a cool idea, but that she recognized the limits in her own listening and moved to correct it.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, there’s a fun thought, a listening ambassador, and, in some ways, it feels a lot more wholesome and upright than, I guess, the non-consensual listening ambassadors called a spy. It’s like, “Spy on people and gather the information,” as opposed to a listening ambassador is like, “Oh, we all know what’s going on here. And I feel appreciated because you have made an investment to have someone gather my perspective when it may be difficult because of a language barrier or geographic barrier or something to see what’s going on.”

So, that’s a fun idea in and of itself in its specificity, but also, in terms of a general concept of, “Let’s take listening seriously. Let’s invest in it. Let’s build some infrastructure and acknowledge how valuable this is and get after it.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. Let me just say that I’m very tickled that you used spy as an example. My co-author and I on Radical Listening used loads of examples of professional listeners, psychotherapists, managers, all sorts of people who listen for a living. And we did not include espionage as an industry among it, but only through oversight. As soon as you said it, I wish that we would have included that in the book.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, maybe the sequel, we’ll see. But I’m sure you’ve got boatloads of insights for us and we want to dig into it. Tell us, is there a key message or big idea that you capture in your book, Radical Listening, that folks who want to be awesome at their jobs should know?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. It is time for listening to have a refresh. Let’s start there. All of us grew up with or have been trained in so-called active listening. And active listening is a good start, you know, make eye contact, summarize what the person says, check for clarification, “Am I reading you right?” It really emphasizes comprehension and it positions listening as if it’s just about understanding.

And what we do to extend that is suggest that there are many intentions for listening, that you might listen in order to entertain a group, you might listen to just appreciate someone, you might listen to influence, you might listen to learn something, you might listen to argue or rebut. And whatever your intention is, that’s going to direct your attention. And it’s a very, very efficient form of listening. So, a courtroom litigator, for example, is not listening to validate opposing counsel. They don’t care how…

Pete Mockaitis
“It must be really hard for you, plaintiff. It must be really difficult.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
That’s exactly right. Just like, “Ah, I can really see that this must be difficult,” or, “Wow, even trying this case must be such a burden. I’m sure you had to stay up late,” all those types of things. That’s out the window. And you don’t even have to worry about what’s the emotional state of the opposition. Instead, you’re just focused on the things that are goal-oriented for you. So, weak evidence, spurious arguments, logical fallacies, inconsistencies, and that’s what you’re listening for.

And it turns out that whatever your intention, if you want to listen to validate someone, you are going to listen for their emotions. If you want to listen to learn, you’re going to listen, pay attention to key words, to connections between what they’re saying and your own web of knowledge. So, just the idea that there are multiple intentions, you should know your intention, and your intention guides your attention.

Pete Mockaitis
And, Robert, is it fair to say that our limited human brain capacity can’t have it all, we can’t get all the logic and all the learning and all the education and all the emotion at once?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. I’m glad that you’re bringing that up because I do think it’s a common belief, and I certainly have held this belief in the past, that, “Oh, I’m a great listener, and I can just sort of sponge all of it up. I’m getting everything. I’m getting the motive behind what you’re saying. I’m noticing what you’re not saying. I’m noticing your tone of voice. I’m noticing everything.” And it’s just not the way that attention works. So, being a bit more judicious with this limited resource can be, I think, very productive.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, let’s lay out the flavors of intention, just make sure we have the full menu documented here.

Robert Biswas-Diener
So, broadly speaking, you might think of there are sort of three umbrellas that we could put these intentions under. One is sort of pro-social motives for listening, so, “I’m listening to appreciate you. I’m listening to connect with you. I’m listening to partner with you to solve a problem.” Those would be three pro-social motives.

Three anti-social motives, “I’m listening to find fault. I’m listening to undermine you.” Those are kind of related. And, thirdly, “I’m listening to defend myself against you.” And then we also have three, kind of, we call them self-focused, although I’m not sure, to be honest, that’s the best way to look at it. But these are just three things that sort of help me. And that is, “I’m just listening to learn something new. I’m listening for comprehension,” that’s sort of the classic act of listening. And those are kind of the two big motives that are helpful to me as the listener.

Pete Mockaitis
Is there a distinction between listening to learn something new and listening for comprehension?

Robert Biswas-Diener
So, listening for comprehension is, “Do I understand what I’m hearing?” Learning is, “Now that I understand it, can I integrate it? Can I find use for it? Can I synthesize it with my own existing body of knowledge and skill in usable ways?”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, so then I suppose the implication of this is to thoughtfully choose your intention upfront in advance of the conversation, as opposed to just showing up in whatever brain state you happen to be wearing at the moment.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. And where you see this go wrong, imagine a team meeting, for example, where you’ve got a pretty funny person on the team and they just keep cracking jokes. And it’s nice when it works because it cuts through tension, it lightens the mood, but maybe they default to it too often. And it’s because that’s just sort of a default listening mode for them, like, “I’m just listening to entertain people.”

So, those kinds of people listen for pauses because pauses are where you insert jokes. They’re listening for themes because themes are what you’re going to riff on. But it might not be helpful because that might not be what is needed. So, you also need some alignment with sort of what is contextually or situationally appropriate.

If someone wants feedback on a presentation, you should be directing your attention towards that, “I want to listen with a critical ear and see what works, what doesn’t. What do I know about you in terms of your ability to take feedback? How much do I need to sugarcoat it?” those types of things. So, a little bit of matching your listening intention with what’s being asked for.

Pete Mockaitis
And I think it’s interesting how we may very well have that default mode. You mentioned entertainment, which I guess wasn’t on the menu. So, I guess there’s many flavors beyond the eight you’ve suggested is my takeaway there, is that we may very well have a default state all the time in terms of– I remember I had a sweet friend and mentor, Marilyn, and she just knew this guy who was a billionaire, and she just thought that was cool.

And she was working with some students and she just thought, “Hey, these students have an entrepreneurial interest. They might just have fun, you know, dinner with this guy. I know him, I know the students, let’s just do this.” And so, she’s talking to with the person, and he just says immediately, “Okay, so what do you want?” because that’s what he’s accustomed to. It’s like, “People tap on me to make requests of my resources.”

And she said, “Well, I’m sorry that this is just how life goes for you. We just think it’d be fun to hang out and get to know you and learn a little bit about your world.” And he’s like, “Oh, well, that sounds really nice. Let’s set it up.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. And one of the things I like about that story is that what they’re trying to do in a very explicit way is just make sure that they’re aligned, “What is it you’re asking for? What is it I want?” We all know times that someone sort of complains to you and really all they want is a bit of validation.

They just want you to say, “I get it. You’re a victim. You’ve been done wrong here. I’m so sorry. You’ve put on a brave face. You’re doing great.” And instead, what we give them is a bunch of advice and try and solve their problem. And when that misalignment happens, it actually is a bit destructive to the relationship. It feels off and disconnecting.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so that sounds like a key benefit just right there. It’s like when you’re matching the intention appropriately, relationships are enriched because this folk, is like, “Oh, this is beautiful. This person is giving me just what I need in this moment, and it just feels good. And I like them more and I am less annoyed and frustrated with them.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. And, look, I want to be cautious and honest. I’m not one of these people that writes a book, like, “Oh, I wrote a book on listening. And guess what? I happen to think that listening is the thing that’s going to cure the world and all the problems.” I don’t think that. I think listening is sort of like opening the door, but then you still have to walk through it and do some exploration. I think listening is a good start.

I think listening, in the way that you just mentioned, where you kind of listen with positive intent, you have respect, you both feel aligned, that’s a great place then to build a relationship, then to cooperate, then to engage in teamwork or change or whatever it is you’re going to do. So, I think it starts with listening, but I don’t think listening by itself is the whole picture.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And let’s say we’re all in, Robert. That sounds great. I would like to do that and I would like to do that well and I could see the benefits. And yet, you also highlight a few internal barriers to listening. Can you lay these out for us?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. In all honesty, this is one of my favorite parts of everything my co-author and I have put down on the page. Some of the barriers, everyone’s going to already have an intuition about, “Oh, let me guess, distraction, technology, your phone.” Sure. All of those are barriers. But the ones that I think are really kind of almost the insidious ones are the ones that you may be less aware of.

So, for example, feeling that you’re right about something is a barrier to learn, “I mean, why listen, because I already know? I already have made up my mind and foreclosed on my own rightness about this.” Politeness can be a barrier to listening. Like, instead of really paying attention to you, I’ve just sort of dismissed in my mind what you’re saying and I’m just nodding along and saying, “Yes, yes, yes,” even though I don’t mean it, and I’ve just checked out, but politeness is sort of this cloth that I’m swaddled in that protects me from real listening.

One that I find really interesting, I call it walk with me. In the book, we call it time urgency. And it’s this idea that you go to someone and you’re like, “Hey, I’ve got something I need to speak with you about,” and they say something along the lines of, “Walk with me. I’ve got a meeting here, it’s going to start in eight minutes, but come with me, walk with me.”

And it’s so well-intentioned. To the listener, the person saying “Walk with me,” it’s this idea that, “Oh, look at me, how gracious I am. I’m making time for you.” But it can really feel awful to the person who has this urgent request. They’re sort of saying, “There’s something very important.”

And you’re saying, “My mind is already to the next thing. At best, I’m wedging you in. I am already a bit distracted. I’m giving you a limited amount of time and we’re catering to my needs rather than your needs. In fact, you’re going somewhere you hadn’t even intended to go.”
And so, although it’s well-intentioned, I think it runs the risk. And there’s a whole bunch of these that are well-intentioned, but run the risk of just standing in the way of great listening.

Pete Mockaitis
More of those, please. Lay them on us.

Robert Biswas-Diener
These are cousins, conceptually speaking. One is comparing. And we’ve all done this. Comparing is when someone mentions an experience and then you’re like, “Hey, I’ve also had that experience.” And so, you share that with them. They say, “Oh, yeah, I went to Hong Kong last summer.” You’re like, “Oh, wow, you know what? I went to Hong Kong last summer, too.”

And again, it’s well intentioned because what you’re trying to communicate is, “Look, we have this common ground. We have a shared experience. Like, we’re cut from the same cloth.” And yet, what it does is it sort of shifts the spotlight away from them. It often does work, which is why we do it. But when it doesn’t work, it’s sort of like saying, “Enough about you and your Hong Kong stories. Let’s talk about me and my Hong Kong stories.”

And the cousin to it is competing. And this happens when, often in a complaint scenario, when someone will say something like, “I was up till 2:00 working on that report last night. I only got six hours of sleep, so I’m a little tired today.” And as a rejoinder, you say, “Six hours of sleep? I only got three hours of sleep.”

Again, it’s well-intentioned. You’re not trying to put them down or invalidate them. You’re trying to say, “We’re cut from the same cloth. We’re both people who are sleep-deprived,” but it comes across, oftentimes, as being dismissive.

So, there’s many of these things that are intuitively appealing to us as conversationalists that I think serve as these kinds of murky barriers that we might not even be aware of that, that often sort of burst the bubble of connection.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, what seems the underlying theme of all of these is, “To what extent are we allowing our conversational counterpart, our interlocutor…” I’m thinking Plato, “…to take center stage?” versus, “Does it need to be about me?”

Robert Biswas-Diener
One hundred percent. And I think that is the core of Radical Listening is the idea that, “When I interact with you, I want you to feel like you do have a spotlight on you, that I do have genuine concern for what you’re talking about, that you do have the space to articulate your thoughts, agenda, ideas, opinions, whatever it is that you want to share.” And whenever we sort of grab the podium away, that’s where things get problematic.

Pete Mockaitis
You know, I’m reminded of, I had just a fun conversation with a midwife who said that she used to work in hospice, and she was amazed when the family arrived in the final days before someone was about to pass away. And she said, “I was astounded at everyone’s ability to make the dying person about them. It’s like, ‘You know, I just got the call. I had to change my flight.” Like all these things, like, as the hustle and bustle, as they get into the hospital room, like in the final days, because they’re like, “Hey, you better get here because they don’t have much time left.”

And she said, “I was amazed at how this happened again and again and again.” And I think it’s really telling because it’s an extreme situation and it highlights that, for many of us, I mean, it sounds bad, but I guess it’s maybe accurate language. We have such a self-centered preoccupation running in our brains, we don’t even realize how off-putting it can be. And that happens maybe, I don’t know, for some of us all the time and for some of us, you know, occasionally. But it’s sort of spooky how common this blind spot is.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. And it’s all of us. It’s me. It’s probably you to some extent. We are the protagonists in the plays of our own lives, right? And if someone said, “Oh, by the way, do you know you’re actually just a supporting character?” That’s kind of an unsettling way of thinking. One of the things I noticed about you, Pete, I mean, as a professional listener, right, you’re listening to guests all the time, but you’re sort of doing this balance of it’s not only about the guest.

I mean, if you were just silent and then the guest spoke the entire time, that wouldn’t be very gratifying either. So, there is this sort of dance between you inserting key moments, but giving sort of the lion’s share to the guests. And, in general, I think that’s kind of how conversations go, that if you listen with respect, you really make the person feel valued in what they’re saying, then it will come back around to you and you will get to be the main character for a time. But then you also have to be ready to relinquish that.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, Robert, it’s an interesting situation here because, I mean you no disrespect, but the most important stakeholder in this conversation isn’t here and it’s the listener and it’s all in service of them. And so, it just happens to work out nicely that we’re both fascinated by this topic that we’re in, because I get tons of pitches and we reject the vast majority of them.

So, the fact that we’re here means I’m into it, you’re into it, and that’s just good, and that’s good content for a listener. But, yeah, it’s interesting because that’s the game, is if you have the coolest story, but it’s not in service of the listener, I’m going to try to move us on and then the audio editors will remove it later. And that’s kind of the game we’re playing right now.

Robert Biswas-Diener
It’s so interesting. I never, in a million years, would admit to what I’m about to admit to.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, I’m into it.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Yeah, but I’m going to because of the direction that this conversation just took. During this conversation that we have been having, in my mind, because I’m also monitoring what I’m saying, a thought popped into my head and it was, “Be careful not to give away all the content of the book, Robert, right, because you want the listeners out there to be hungry for more and to go buy the book.”

And as soon as I had that thought, I thought of that as a disservice to the listener. And I thought, “Really, this is in the service of the listener. What we want is to give them as much usable content, as many fresh ideas as possible. And whether they buy the book, don’t buy the book, should not be my primary concern because that is that egotistical bias. But instead, I really should be doing this in service of them. Can I just tell you as much information as possible and you, the listener, can decide what’s useful for you?”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, while we’re riffing on these things, that reminds me of, I’ve been reflecting lately. I think it was by this book by Marcus, somebody, called They Ask, You Answer, and it’s about content marketing. And so, he says, “Consumers find it very frustrating,” and I agree. If I’m on a website and I want to know, say, “Hey, what’s this thing costs?” and they will not give me a price, or even like a guideline of what the price might be, it’s frustrating.

Because, as consumer, it’s like, “You know the price or the price range, and I know that you know it, and you know that I know that you know it, but you’re choosing not to give it to me,” especially on a frequently asked questions, an FAQ, “Really the price is not one of the frequently asked questions? That seems like among the most frequently of asked questions.”

And so, likewise, there are some YouTube channels or podcasts, and I won’t, you know, poo-poo them by name, but it sits a little bit wrong with me when I know. I’m all about building curiosity and teasing and being intriguing. But if they say, you know, for example, if we were to tease this interview and we started with you with a clip saying, “And the number one most transformational key to listening is…” and it like bleeps it out and it like blurs it.

It’s like I, as a listener, a consumer, I find that troubling because like, “You know it, I know it, you’re deliberately withholding it from me. And I don’t like that. And in order to get me to listen, to watch more, to view the ads, or whatever. And I think it’s counterproductive. Because if you give me something mind-blowing, I’m like, ‘Whoa, Robert, this guy has got insights. I better listen to more of him.’” So that’s just my take on that practice.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Well, I absolutely love your take. And I love the direction that this conversation has taken because it’s like a real moment of authenticity in, otherwise, what could feel scripted. You ask me some questions about the book. I’ve been on lots of podcasts. I give you lots of answers that I’m pretty practiced at. But here, suddenly, we’re getting into, I think, a very real example of listening and all the foibles around listening, which is sometimes I have my own agenda and it interferes with another agenda. Sometimes I’m not sure what to do. Sometimes I don’t have a clear intention.

And all of this is happening within us while we’re trying to be good listeners. And that just feels very realistic to me. So, I’m not a person that’s like, “Oh, go buy the book, learn these five steps, and I promise you, you’re going to be a transformed, perfect listener.” You won’t. I mean, I think that you’ll learn more about listening. You might appreciate listening more. You might experiment with some things. People might notice that you’re listening a bit better. And I think there is some mileage to be had in that kind of realism.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I understand that you cannot give us the magical spells, the super five things that will cure all listening foibles but, nonetheless, I do want some of your actionable tips. Do we have some big dos and don’ts that just make a tremendous difference in your listening and all the relationship goodness that unfolds with great listening?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. So, we present six skills and, again, let’s be honest, there could be eight skills, there could be five skills. We chose six. Three of them we think of are internal. They’re things that would be invisible to your interlocutor. They’re just happening within you mentally. And three of them are behavioral, things that your conversational partner would notice.

So, I’ll just give you one that’s a little counterintuitive about what you would notice, one of the behavioral ones. We say that interjecting, or if you prefer, interrupting, is a highly engaged form of listening. And for most people that’s pretty counterintuitive. Most people have learned that politeness equals turn-based conversation, you speak, I speak, you speak, I speak, back and forth. And yet there are excellent reasons to interrupt.

So, I’ll just start by saying that if interruption is just overlapping speech, if that just means two people are speaking simultaneously, we’re all doing it all the time. So, if I say, “Mm-hmm,” while you’re talking, that’s a short interruption. If I say, “Oh, wow,” while you’re talking, that’s a bigger interruption. If I say, “What? Wait, I can’t believe it. No way,“ while you’re talking, that’s an even bigger interruption.

If I jump in and say, “Wait a minute. Say that again. What?” those are all forms of interruptions, and those are excellent because they show the person, “I care about what’s happening. I’m right here with you.” And the alternative is letting the person prattle on for 10 minutes. And then in return, you say, “There’s something you said 10 minutes ago that I’d like to go back to.” And that can feel really kind of dismissive to the person because they’re like, “Why did you just let me talk for 10 minutes if the thing that was interesting to you happened 10 minutes ago?”

Pete Mockaitis
That’s a really strong perspective. But, again, following that principle of your conversation partner is taking center stage, the interruptions are in service of them and your understanding, like, “Wait a minute. He said what? But didn’t he just say the opposite?” Or we could go, “Yes, he did. And that’s why this is a big deal.”

And so, you could see how the conversational vibe goes into a very connected place with that interruption as opposed to waiting, and just makes sure you clarify. It’s like, “Wait, Robert? Oh, no, that Robert. Oh, okay, now I’m tracking with you. I’m on the same page.”

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. And that clarification, that’s a perfect example, and we do these all the time. Another type is called an alert. So, let’s say you and I are both talking about that Robert, and here comes Robert, but you can’t see him because your back is to him. And I might say, “Pete, shut up. Here he comes.” That’s an alert and that’s an interruption, but you never think that’s rude because you think it’s in the service of you. So, anytime that I’m essentially jumping in, but then returning the turn to speak to you, people just don’t even clock it as rude at all.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, interruptions can be helpful. What else you got?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Absolutely. Let’s do one on the other side of the fence. One of the internal skills. Let’s start with just, I think, a tough one, and that’s acceptance. This is probably the toughest skill we have, and I just say it like, “Oh, just accept the other person and what they’re saying.” But anyone who’s been alive for five minutes knows that that’s really, really a hard pill to swallow.

So, what we mean when we say acceptance is not that you are agreeing with the point of view. You’re welcome to present counter evidence, alternatives but, at some point, you have to sort of understand that the person you’re speaking with has a right to a point of view. And to do this, it requires some personal intellectual humility. And intellectual humility is like a cousin to actual humility.

Humility is thinking that you have no more fundamental worth than another person. But intellectual humility is a recognition that you are limited, that you haven’t figured it all out, that you do have some natural biases, that you do have a skewed vision, that your personal experience colors your vision of life. And it’s fine for you to come up with moral reasoning or professional expertise, but it’s equally fine for another person. And you can’t just assume, you’re wiser, you’re smarter, and you happen to have landed on the truth, lucky you.

You should think, “You know what, that person may have different values, they’ve had different experiences, they have a different professional role, and so they’re going to arrive at slightly different conclusions. I don’t ever have to agree with them, but I always have to respect their right to have them.” And that takes some work, but when you engage in that, you have more types of conversations and you open a door to conversations that you might otherwise avoid that can ultimately be productive conversations.

Pete Mockaitis
Can you give us an example?

Robert Biswas-Diener
I think, day to day, this happens at work all the time. And it’s just, you know, one person wants to greenlight a project and the other person says, “No, I don’t think we have capacity for it right now,” or, “I don’t think it’s fleshed out well enough,” or, “I don’t think the strategy is in place for it.”

And you have two totally opposing views. And often what happens is the two parties are embattled and they simply aren’t listening. It becomes this sort of feat of who can bully the other into getting their way, “If only I can lob so much evidence at you, so much passion at you, I’ll convince you that my chosen direction is the right direction.”

But it gets back to the kind of that seven habits idea, you know, first seek to understand and then be understood. Kind of like, “Look, I already know what I think, but I am curious what you think. What is it you’re looking at? What is it you’re seeing that I’m not seeing?” And when you do that, every once in a while, you’re surprised. It helps you retain a more positive view of the person you’re talking about.

They’re not just some, you know, bumbling dolt that that happen to arrive at something, that they actually are pretty thoughtful and pretty intentional in their approach. And you may or may not get what you want out of that, but it is going to lead to a better team dynamic in that.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you. Well, Robert, tell me anything else you want to make sure to put out there before we shift gears and hear about some of your favorite things?

Robert Biswas-Diener
I’ll just mention that this applies, to some degree, across cultures, but culture is kind of interesting. We learn cultural scripts for interacting with one another. I’ve recently been traveling with someone. I’m American, and the person I was traveling with was not American. And I just realized that they didn’t have a script for some basic conversations.

Like, “How does this coffee shop banter work? The person asked me how I was, not just what I wanted to order. And I don’t know the level of depth I should be answering that question in, how much honesty I should be giving them.” Things that we would just take for granted because we have a good intuitive sense for those kinds of answers.

I was in the elevator with him and I was speaking to strangers on the elevator, and he’s like, “How did you know you could do that? What were you taking into account that made it okay for you to speak with strangers?” And I just started realizing, “Wow, this is really, really different across cultures.” And some of the things that listening does across cultures is, for example, the role of silence.

People interpret silence differently across cultures. So, for example, in Japan, just to use one instance, silence is often considered respectful. It is a sign of thoughtfulness and it’s usually perceived as something, not the absence of something, and you are kind of paying attention to silences. So, like, if people aren’t talking, maybe it means they don’t agree, but they don’t want to say it. And so, you are kind of trying to read the silence a bit.

Whereas, you imagine in the United States, silence is often felt as awkward and we rush to fill it in. So, some of these kind of communication exchanges, some of the communication technology is going to shift a little bit based on people’s cultural script.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, thank you. Well, now can you share with us a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Robert Biswas-Diener
It comes from George Bernard Shaw’s play, “Julius Caesar,” and it is, “Forgive him, Theodotus, for he is a barbarian, and thinks the ways of his tribe and island are the laws of nature.” And I just love the idea of kind of intellectual humility built into that.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Robert Biswas-Diener
One of my colleagues, Shige Oishi, had people shoot basketballs or shoot darts, and he saw how well they did at each. And he invited them back the next week and said, “Take your choice. Do you want to do baskets or darts?” And the Americans who did well at one wanted to stay with it and keep doing the one because they wanted, wanted to stay with the thing that they felt good about.

And the Asians and Asian Americans in his study, if they did well on one, they wanted to shift and do the opposite one because they were more inclined to want to master something new. And I’ve always just felt like that was a very clever methodology and a very interesting cultural study.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite book?

Robert Biswas-Diener
This is a recency effect, but I just finished Dracula and I loved it.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Robert Biswas-Diener
A pen.

Pete Mockaitis
Any particular brand or type or features?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Well, I do a lot of drawing also, so I like anything that doesn’t smear, but I just use a lot of Bic roller balls.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite habit?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Oh, my favorite habit is to wake up extraordinarily early and draw for one hour before I start the day. I always prioritize my wellbeing so that I feel strong and centered before embarking on everything else I’m going to do.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, you hear them put it back to you often?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Yeah, a recent one, and I stole this actually from my co-author, but just the idea that you should remember that everyone is in the middle of something. And if you just approach everyone all the time with, “You know what, they’re in the middle of something. I’m in the middle of something. They’re in the middle of something,” it can make you a little bit more forgiving and a little bit more patient.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Robert Biswas-Diener
I would point them to my website, IntentionalHappiness.com. And I’d love to hear from people.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Robert Biswas-Diener
Yeah, absolutely. And let’s keep it thematically aligned with listening. I would pay attention to times that you, this coming week, feel really listened to, and note what the other person is doing. What’s happening that makes you feel so heard, so validated? And see then if that’s what you can do to pay it forward.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Robert, thank you.

Robert Biswas-Diener
Oh, thanks so much. This was super fun.

1038: Getting What You Need from Your Boss through Managing Up with Melody Wilding

By | Podcasts | No Comments

Melody Wilding breaks down the crucial conversations to have with your boss to improve your work life.

You’ll Learn

  1. How to differentiate yourself with one conversation
  2. How to build your pushback power
  3. The easiest way to improve your visibility

About Melody

Melody Wilding is a professor of human behavior at Hunter College and author of Managing Up. She was recently named one of Insider’s “most innovative career coaches.” Her background as a therapist and emotions researcher informs her unique approach, weaving evidence-based neuroscience and psychology with professional development. Her previous book is Trust Yourself.

Resources Mentioned

Thank You, Sponsors!

Melody Wilding Interview Transcript

Pete Mockaitis
Melody, welcome back.

Melody Wilding
Thanks for having me again. So great to be here.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, it is great to be chatting with you from the fine state of New Jersey, which we discussed is lovely.

Melody Wilding
That’s right. Beautiful state, very misunderstood, but we love our Jersey.

Pete Mockaitis
Lovely. Well, let’s talk about managing up. We haven’t discussed this issue in quite some time and I think it is so vitally important. Can you share with us maybe an extra surprising or counterintuitive discovery you’ve made as you researched this managing up stuff?

Melody Wilding
Well, I think, just like New Jersey, managing up is very misunderstood, and even when I began writing the book, I was resistant to the idea of calling it managing up and even zeroing in on that concept. I wanted to talk more about influence and persuasion, how do you build respect and recognition. And my publisher had to keep nudging me that, “Yeah, what you’re talking about is the skill set of managing up.”

And I think my resistance came, and what I’ve heard from many other people, is from these misconceptions we have. These old images of managing up from the ‘80s, the ‘90s, the person being the suck-up and running around with their boss’s coffee order. And who wants to do that? No one wants to compromise who they are or feel like they’re ingratiating themselves to the people around them. So, it’s no wonder why we resist this concept.

But what I know now, having done this work and researched this subject is that managing up is not something you do for your boss’s benefit at all. It’s really something you do for yourself to make your own work life, your own career, much easier, less stressful and on your own terms.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, I dig that a lot. And while we’re talking about misconceptions, let’s clear them up, I recall, I think I was reading a piece by, Paul Graham, the Y Combinator guy, made a statement along the lines of “Professional managers are amongst the finest liars there are.” And folks are like, “Whoa, that’s some strong language. What do you mean?”

He’s like, “Ah, perhaps I should say, they are adept at managing up,” which sort of imply, well, more than imply, that managing up involves telling the folks above you a little bit of what they want to hear, and massaging their perceptions and expectations, and it really made it sound quite like it’s the art of deception in the professional, acceptable way that we can courteously do so in proper modern times,” Melody. So, have you picked up on those perceptions and how do you address that?

Melody Wilding
I think, again, that’s the older school way of thinking about it. And what I would argue is it’s less about massaging and contorting yourself to someone else’s perceptions and more about tweaking, or in the book I call it flexing, your approach so that your message is actually getting through to the people who need to hear it the most.

That may mean you do need to tweak how you present something, or the type of language you use so that it’s more resonant with the other person, but I don’t think, wholesale, it means that you have to change who you are or what you’re trying to say, because this book is really all about, “How do you have the tough conversations with your manager? How do you push back on extra work or give them tough feedback up the chain of command?”

That’s what managing up really is. It’s having those difficult conversations, sometimes having the courage to say what needs to be said, but doing so in a tactful diplomatic manner that actually earns you trust instead of just turning into a professional people-pleaser.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, could you share with us a nice story that inspires or brings this together in terms of what’s really at stake if we master this skillset?

Melody Wilding
Yes, I think the book actually starts with one of my personal stories which was a time I failed to manage up, and I think it’s a lesson in multiple ways. So, before I went full-time into my current business, I was working at a health care company, and I loved that job. I loved my boss. What I didn’t realize at the time that I saw in hindsight was that I had been hired to work on really a pet project of my managers that was kind of outside of the rest of the company’s scope, and my manager had been given a bit of budget and, unbeknownst to me, some timeline to see if this was viable or not.

And so, that was my first fail, was really not getting on the same page with my manager about “What was the context that this project came up in? What are the expectations? Who else needs to be bought in and on board with this?” And long story short, let’s flash forward, I ended up being laid off. My role was eliminated, and it felt like a shock to me, and it shouldn’t have.

And that is what’s at stake. That’s a very extreme example of what happens when you don’t manage up well, but I was really sideswiped because I hadn’t aligned with my manager. I didn’t have other advocates in the organization who were willing to fight for me and keep me because managing up has to go beyond your boss.

Do not make your manager your single point of failure. You might not get along with them very well despite all of your efforts. Who is leading you may change on a moment’s notice, so you need to make sure you have those other allies as well. And all of that was a very cautionary tale, but I think that’s what’s at stake, whether, again, in my case, it was extreme. I lost my role.

But every day, people feel like they’re overlooked for promotions and opportunities, it may go to someone else who seems less experienced, or we get into these minor frustrations that we end up taking personally, “You know, why does my boss cut me off? They never even allow me to hear my idea out,” or, “Why are they micromanaging me and on top of me about everything?” And so much of this can be solved by learning some key skills.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, tell us, you lay out 10 key conversations for managing up well, which I love. And so, we’ve got alignment, styles, ownership, boundaries, feedback, networking, visibility, advancement, money, and quitting. So, I really dig this because I just love a framework and a set of distinctions and a delineation of categories that just helps make sense of the whole universe of managing up conversations. It feels like, “Yeah, that’s a pretty fine job of summing them up.”

So, I suppose I’m curious, do you have a gauge for what percent of folks ever actually proactively say, “Hey, I’d like to have a conversation about some of the fundamental ways we work and communicate with each other, and what would be best for both of us”? In a way, that almost seems like among the most foundational things one might do in the world of managing up. Is that fair? And how often is that happening?

Melody Wilding
It’s definitely fair. It’s very true, that it is so fundamental that, I think, we sometimes assume it. We assume that this has happened and we overlook it because of that. So, to your point, I would say maybe 10% of people are having those types of explicit conversations about how they work together with their manager, and that is a huge, huge opportunity.

Because if you are in that small minority of people who are doing this, you’re not only going to stand out as someone who is thoughtful, conscientious, you’re driven, you’re taking initiative, but you’re going to have intel and build rapport and trust much more quickly than anyone else.

Pete Mockaitis
Absolutely. I agree, and I’ve experienced it on both sides of the table. Because it’s rare, it feels very special, like, “Oh, wow, this person, I like them. They’re on top of things.” And I think it’s hard for that to go poorly. Maybe if you ask at just like the worst possible time, like, “Hey, that’s like the definition of a non-urgent situation and we’re in the midst of something on fire right now.” So, maybe that that’s one way it could go poorly. But tell us your take on that in terms of to what extent do managers welcome these discussions because I think there’s a bit of reluctance on the part of some folks to initiate?

Melody Wilding
There definitely is, yeah. And when I have this conversation with people, in the book, we’re talking about really the styles conversation, and that’s when we talk about how, “How do we work together? How do we communicate? What are your preferences? What are mine?” And going back to what I said a moment ago, when you understand the context of who your boss is, and also what your defaults are, you stop taking things so personally because you understand, “Oh, this is their style. This is their way of approaching and processing information.”

“And so, if they send a period instead of an exclamation point, I don’t need to make that mean that I’m getting fired, or they hate me, or they’re against me and they favorite somebody else.” We can be much more diplomatic and make those tweaks to how we communicate.

Melody Wilding
And in my experience, people are reluctant, yes, to bring this up, but when they do, their manager is overjoyed. And, of course, you need to bring this up in a tactful way. So, what I suggest is that you present it to your boss and say something along the lines where you show why this is in their benefit, to say, “I’m really committed to us being able to reach our goals together this year.”

Or, “I want to make sure that you can get the best performance out of me possible, that our work flows more smoothly, whatever it is. And to get there, what I would love to do is understand a bit more about how you work and how I can communicate with you better to get you the information you need. Does that sound good?”

And you can start by asking certain questions of your manager, whether it’s, “If I have to get certain updates to you, what format is best? Do you want those in Teams, in email? Should I present a slide deck? Do you prefer bullet points or should I do narratives?”

Understanding some of those preferences, when you are asking your manager questions, gives you opportunities to then say, “Great. Thank you so much for sharing that. From my standpoint, here’s what would be helpful. If you have feedback for me, take me aside after a meeting, or if you notice that I’m not being as concise as I could be in a presentation, shoot me a quick message on Teams so I can adjust on the fly.”

All of us have different preferences around that, but it turns it into more of a two-way street where, yes, you’re understanding what your manager wants, but you’re also finding opportunities to assert, or at least put on the table, “Here’s what I would like. Is that something that we can find a middle ground on together?”

Pete Mockaitis
That sounds great, yes. And as you say it, and I’m imagining the scene, that seems pleasant and welcome to hear such things. And I want to dive deep on a couple of these. I don’t think we could do all 10 in our time together, but one with regard to boundaries. I remember when I was reading through this, I recall a conversation I had with my friend, Kelsey. We were catching up at a wedding. It had been a long time.

And she was telling me all of, like, the cool things she was doing with, like, go to an Ironman Triathlon, and this and that. I was like, “Wait a minute. I’m sorry. Don’t you work in consulting?” And she’s like, “Yeah.” I was like, “How on earth are you finding the time to have all of these adventures and do all of these things when I recall my days of consulting were so brutal with regard to the hours of the travel and the unexpectedness of things?”

And she was like, “Oh, well, you know, I just kind of talked to my boss and said, ‘Well, hey, here’s what’s going on, here’s the nights I’m not available, and here’s the thing…” She just sort of laid it out in terms of what’s up, in terms of, “I’m going to over-deliver on these key metrics and expectations, and these are the nights I will not be available to be doing things.”

And I was like, “And they went for that?” My mouth dropped, I was like, “You can do that? That’s possible? Even in client services? Wow.” And so, I was struck at just what a managing-up boundary conversation can do for transforming a life into being sustainable and enjoyable in what can be demanding fields.

So, lay it on us, Melody, if we want to establish boundaries but we’re a little scared and we think that we might misstep, or seem like we’re not a team player, or we’re lazy, or we’re not really committed, or any of these other negative associations we fear, how do we play the boundary-setting conversation game?

Melody Wilding
Well, that’s the tension with it, right? We need to protect our well-being, but we also don’t want to look like a slacker, so we have to find that balance there. And the thing with the boundaries-conversation is that “no” may be a complete sentence in many areas of life, but at work it doesn’t go over so well if you just say, “No, I’m not going to do that,” or “I don’t want to do that,” right? It’s going to hurt your reputation for you to say that so you need to be more thoughtful about how you approach it.

And what I think is so telling about what your friend did is it sounds like she was assessing, what I call in the book, your pushback power. And your pushback power is the invisible leverage you do or don’t have to push back, to say no. And we all fall somewhere on the spectrum, higher to lower. Your pushback power is higher if you have more positional authority.

If you’re more seasoned, tenured in your career, you have more credibility behind you, you are a high performer, or you offer a very specialized skillset that people may be more willing to make accommodations for because it could be hard to replace you. And even things like the strength of your relationship with your boss, how you build trust and rapport, your boss’s values, the state of the organization.

If the team is in free fall, in crisis, it’s going to be harder to say, “I can’t pitch in this weekend,” or, “I can’t take on more of this project for a colleague who just left,” versus if you’re in a time of stability, it might be a little more receptive to that. So, taking into account that pushback power allows you to gauge “How directly or assertively can I say no? And how frequently can I say no?”

And it sounds like your friend did that with her manager. Because she was higher in pushback power, she was able to say, “I have these commitments, and so can we find a solution to work my workload around these commitments that I have?”

Now, for those of us that may be medium to lower in pushback power, there’s a number of different things you can do. One of my favorite approaches that I talk about is called the trade-off approach, and this is great because it allows you to set up binary options. So, you may say, “Okay, thank you for sharing that, you know, Y has come down as an important priority from the leadership team. A few weeks ago, we had talked about that you wanted me to focus on X.”

“And so, if X is truly still a priority, how would you like me to reprioritize to make room for Y? Or what would you like me to slow down on? What would you like us to delegate or temporarily deprioritize in order to make that possible?” And the beauty of this is that you are setting the parameters. You are setting the decision options, subtly saying, “Both of these cannot happen at the same time. Which one would you like to choose?”

But ultimately, you’re approaching it more as a problem-solving conversation instead of just dumping a problem back in your boss’s lap to say, “I don’t know. I can’t do it, so figure out someone else to get it done.” You’re approaching it more as a collaboration, which that person will appreciate, and the ultimate authority is back in their hands.

Pete Mockaitis
And I think that’s really handy because I think without the conversation, we can just assume, “Oh, I have to continue doing all the things we’ve ever discussed, as well as this new thing, and that’s just that,” and that is a dangerous, untenable place to live. So that’s handy with regard to the conversation. I’m curious, when it comes to increasing our pushback power over time, let’s discuss.

So, one of the levers is just the strength and quality of our relationship. Another is how special and wonderful and high-performing we are. Any others and what are the quickest, easiest ways to boost these so that we are growing in pushback power over time?

Melody Wilding
Well, let’s talk about the performance piece and building rapport and trust with your manager. There’s a conversation that comes before boundaries, and that’s called the ownership conversation. And that’s important here because the ownership conversation is all about looking for where can you take initiative of projects or problems you want to solve and run with, but by doing that really add value or solve an issue that’s a pain point for your manager, your team, the organization.

And when you do that, you build, you add to the pushback power you have because you’ve enhanced your value, you’ve shown you’re a problem solver, and that’s really valuable. So, the ownership conversation is all about “How do I not only spot those opportunities, but capitalize on them in a way that’s not going to step on the toes of other people around us?” Because that would backfire, of course.

And a lot of it comes down to choosing the right problem to start. And so, I talk about how there’s five worthwhile areas to look at. And a few of those may be bottlenecks. So, are there inefficiencies or broken processes, for example, that are slowing everyone down, including you, that if solved would make everybody’s lives much less stressful and easier?

Neglected needs is also a great place to look. What are the topics or agenda items that keep going to the bottom of the pile or keep rolling over month to month, quarter to quarter, that no one seems to have the time to get around to, but says, “Wouldn’t it be great? Wouldn’t it be great if we could do that? Or we really need to get to that”? Could you be the one to carry that torch forward?

And another one that I think can be easier to spot is feedback patterns. What are you hearing again and again from fellow team members, clients, your vendors, that if you took action on to make better, would add value to everyone else?

Pete Mockaitis
That’s cool. All right. Well, could you give us a story of this ownership in action? Because I think you’re really keying in on something in terms of differentiating and growing a career, because it’s quite possible to go years at a time in reactive mode of doing whatever somebody asks for, or seems to be perilously on fire.

It’s hard to be distinctive in such a place, as opposed to, with ownership, it’s like, “Oh, you know, that’s a fantastic result. Yeah, that was, really, I’m the person behind that.” That’s hugely awesome. So, could you give us a story about ownership in action?

Melody Wilding
Sure, I have two that come to mind, if that’s okay. So, the first one is, I had a client about a year ago, who, his organization was acquiring a new one and he worked on the legal side of this. And so, because of that, when they acquired this new organization, all of his colleagues were running in the direction of all of the new opportunities that were created by this acquisition and trying to capitalize on that, chasing shiny objects, everyone was trying to meet with the three key leaders.

And what he saw was that that change actually created this vacuum where he could step in, and that no one was tackling, there was a neglected need, in other words, with due diligence matters of closing everything that had to do with that transaction, you know, wrapping up all of the contracts, dotting the I’s and crossing the T’s to make sure the merger was complete.

And so, he said, “You know what? I’m actually going to zig while everybody else is zagging.” And he carved out that niche for himself as being the person who was buttoning up the deal, so to speak, which gave him a lot of exposure to not only he became a close confidant to his manager, but also his skip level, his boss’s boss, and some other key C-suite leaders in the organization who really cared about this going correctly, and who knew, “We have to get these compliance matters correct.”

And for him, that allowed him to build those relationships. He was seen as more of a partner to those people. And flash forward about a year later, he was actually promoted to partner because of that work that played a huge instrumental role. So, that’s one example that comes to mind of looking for opportunities that other people may be missing.

And then the other quick story I’ll share has to do with another client who, after the pandemic, was really interested in getting mental health days going for the organization, making sure that the team had time for development and rest, and weren’t just go, go, go, go, go all the time. And why this was ownership is because she had to create buy-in for this idea. This wasn’t something that others had thought of. This was something she was innovating from the ground up and had to push through.

And so, a couple things that she did really excellently was she came with proposals in hand, and so when she would have meetings with some of the key stakeholders and decision makers, she would come with a one-pager with talking points that they could use, just ready-made. She made their job easy, took the cognitive load off of them, and she proposed small steps.

So, in the book, I talk about this as the foot-in-the-door technique in psychology, where you propose, whether it’s a pilot project or a test or rolling something out to just a small sample. The people around you want to mitigate risk and potential exposure or failure. So, if you could say, “Let’s start with a mental health day and then we can actually roll that out to have these once a quarter and have more events around this.”

She just started with, “Let’s have this one day,” and that was easier for people to get on board with. And, eventually, she was successful in making it something bigger but I thought that was a great example of planting seeds, taking it step by step, and getting small agreements that lead to bigger ones.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s a really cool thing to take ownership of because, well, one, that’s just great for everybody, and two, boy, I sure would like that person in my organization, it’s like, “Oh, this is the person who got us all the mental health days. I want to do them favors whenever possible.”

Melody Wilding
Yes, great point. And that speaks to this idea of looking for triple wins. Is something going to be a win for you in terms of you’ll enjoy the work, it will add to your own credibility? Is it a win for your manager? Will it make them look good or advance their priorities? And, third, is it a win for the team or your organization as a whole?

Like you said, your colleagues are certainly going to love you, but, you know, at the end of the day, for everyone’s productivity, sustainability in their roles and long term the results of the organization, it was huge from that respect, too.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, tell us, within these 10 key conversations, could we pick perhaps one or two that seem to be super transformative and yet pretty easy to do? Any of your favorite tips here?

Melody Wilding
Let’s talk about visibility, if that’s good with you. Yeah, I think this is one that people know they need to do, but don’t quite know how to approach because it feels daunting. It feels daunting to feel like, “Ugh, I spend so much time working. Now you’re telling me I have to advertise that work as well and I have to bring more attention to it?”

And in some ways, yes, because we can expect our work to speak for itself. It’s not going to do that. We need to be the advocate for it. But there are some pretty simple, easy ways to build visibility into just the day-to-day of how you work instead of making it extra effort, and I think that’s the win-win. One way you can do this is by restructuring your one-on-ones.

So, I highly recommend that you start all of your one-on-ones with your manager with wins. And you can call it wins, you can call it progress or milestones or achievements, whatever language feels best to you, but the point of that is to not just dive into status updates of, “Oh, here’s where this project is. Here’s where this is. This is what’s coming up.”

But to more so utilize that time to show your manager, “Yes, here’s what we’ve done, but here’s what it means. Here’s the outcome, the results. Here’s also visibility into how I thought about solving a problem, the considerations that I made, or the people I talked to.” And all of that shows them, yes, you are actually getting things done. It gives them more insight into you operating at a more strategic, perhaps even higher level. And it also gives them information that they need to run up their own chain of command.

And so, it’s not really self-promotion to just puff yourself up. We really need to think about it more as, “I’m giving my boss the data they need to advocate for me, to advocate for the rest of the team, to have resources, opportunities, decision-making power at higher levels.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I think that’s excellent. And often, when we take ourselves out of the equation, there’s less self-consciousness, and it’s like, “Oh, this is this is handy. Like, if I were leading this organization, I would probably want to know about the skills, this asset, this resource, this person has in the mix to be deployed when useful and necessary. Otherwise, everyone just misses out.” And how about advancement?

Melody Wilding
Advancement, yes. And thank you for that great segue because visibility and advancement go hand in hand, right? And you can start to see how these conversations build on each other, intersect, because once people know more about what you’re achieving and know more about you, well, then you’re in a position to do bigger things.

And why I say that term “do bigger things” is because advancement doesn’t always have to be a promotion. It can be that you want to grow your scope, or the budget that you oversee, you want to go from two to four people on your team, or you want to work on a stretch project, or something that’s completely different from your current skillset.

For example, right now I have a lot of clients who are asking for stretch projects in AI, because that’s really important to them to learn and they know it will be a value-add to the organization. So, think more broadly about what advancement could mean, but also think about starting much earlier than you think you might need to.

Because I see way too many people get caught in the performance review paradox where they keep their head down, they think they’re sending signals to their manager about what they want and where they want to go, only for their performance review to arrive and no promotion, no salary increases, no being named to that committee. It seems to pass them by.

And that’s often because we either haven’t been explicit enough about what we want or we’ve waited too long to bring that conversation up, and your manager has already had to allocate headcount or resources or make those decisions. They were made months ago. So, this may mean starting three to six months in advance to plant those seeds.

Let’s say you did hit a big milestone. You may say, “This was such a valuable experience. I really loved getting to interact with these clients or that stakeholder or use this skill. I would love to do more of that. Do you think there’s an opportunity in the coming months?”

And so, you start to get that out there. You may even have more of a formal conversation with your manager to say, “In the next year, I would love to double the size of my team,” or, “I would love to move from manager to director level. What would you need to see to be comfortable with that change?”

And that allows you to surface objections because your manager may say, “Well, you’re not ready for that,” or, “We need to have these other people on this committee bought into this, so I need to rope other people in.” And it allows you to contract so that you can understand, “All right, by June, you need to see this. By December, you need to see that.”

And you can work against that and have follow-ups to say, “All right, I did what we discussed. Are we still on track here? Has anything else come up? Would anything else prevent us from making that decision at that point?” And so, it has advancement top of mind for you and your manager, and it prevents some of moving that goalpost that can happen.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, beautiful. Well, Melody, tell me, any other final tips, tricks, do’s, don’ts before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Melody Wilding
Let’s talk about, briefly, the money conversation because if you have advanced and you’re taking on more, you probably want the salary that comes along with that. Money can also be very loaded and very sensitive, something many of us are not taught how to discuss in our personal lives, let alone in the workplace.

And one of the big mistakes or missteps I see people make here is that they focus way too much on what they’ve done already and not enough on what they can do in the future if they were given more money to do it, and that’s very important. You need to think about, “What’s the potential ROI if the organization gives me five, ten, fifty thousand more dollars, what else would I be able to do? Does it serve bigger clients, manage a bigger team?”

You need to paint that future so that your manager, again, see a theme here, can make a case to their own leadership about, “Why should we give this person more money?” It’s not enough that you want it or you feel you deserve it. That may be true and there needs to be a business case there. So that, combined with, instead of just saying, “I deserve this. I work really hard,” approach it from the standpoint of fairness.

We humans, we are wired for reciprocity. We want to make sure that people feel like they are being treated fairly or correctly. And so, if you can use language around that to say, “I want to make sure that my compensation matches the level that I’m performing at or is commensurate with the amount of value I’m bringing to the organization.” If you can use that sort of language, it makes it feel less like this request that you’re demanding, and again more like a trade.

Pete Mockaitis
Certainly. Well, thank you. Well, now, could you share with us a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Melody Wilding
In the book, I actually cite some of this research around micro-yeses. And so, if you can get a micro-yes, let’s say you have to give someone feedback, and instead of just diving into, “So, in that last meeting, I felt like you talked over me,” ask for permission first. Get a micro-yes, “Will now be a good time to talk?” “Yes, sure.” “Okay, I’d love to chat about that client meeting. Is that good with you?” “Yes, sure.” Get those micro yeses along the way so someone is a bit more bought in and not as surprised by what’s coming next.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite book?

Melody Wilding
Difficult Conversations by Douglas Stone and Sheila Heen. Fantastic book, as well as their other book, Thanks for the Feedback. Both amazing books that really break down the nuances, the anatomy of how to have these difficult conversations.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite tool?

Melody Wilding
I am a huge Oura user, so I have my Oura ring on here.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah. Mine is on my charger.

Melody Wilding
Yes, I probably have to charge mine today, too. But I’ve had it for years, and I just, especially since they have added the heart rate monitoring throughout the day, it is so helpful for me to see what spikes my stress when I go into restorative time. It’s just helped me manage my own schedule and my own energy much better.

Pete Mockaitis
And a favorite habit?

Melody Wilding
I am a go-to-the-gym-first-thing-in-the-morning person.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, you hear them quote it back to you often?

Melody Wilding
“You teach people how to treat you.”

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Melody Wilding
ManagingUp.com is where you can find all the information about the book. You can connect with me as well there, too.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Melody Wilding
Start today with having the alignment conversation, and that is a really simple entry point to begin managing up, to ask your boss, “What would success look like for you in the next three months? What does great performance look like in this role? Or, what metrics does your boss discuss with you?” Start there, and I think that’s going to establish a basis of trust and give you a lot of insight that will be really valuable.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Melody, beautiful. Thank you.

Melody Wilding
Thank you.