This Podcast Will Help You Flourish At Work

Each week, I grill thought-leaders and results-getters to discover specific, actionable insights that boost work performance.

1189: Making Smart Decisions Confidently Amid Uncertainty with Dr. Cindi Baldi

By Podcasts No Comments

Dr. Cindi Baldi shares expert strategies to stay calm and confident in the face of uncertainty.

You’ll Learn

  1. How uncertainty influences us without us realizing
  2. How to power through our bias for risk aversion
  3. The simple habit that builds your wisdom

About Cindi

Dr. Cindi Baldi is the founder and CEO of Culsure, an organizational science firm, co-host of the Management Muse podcast, and co-author of The Uncertainty Playbook. Cindi is an expert in organizational behavior, group performance, and employee identification, with research presented globally at leading institutions. She develops science-based culture and leadership assessments used across corporate, nonprofit, and government organizations, and advises leaders worldwide on improving performance, culture, and team effectiveness.

Resources Mentioned

Pete Mockaitis
Cindi, welcome!

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Thank you. Thank you for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I am excited to talk about uncertainty. You got a whole playbook for us. I’d love it if you could kick us off by sharing what is one of the most surprising things you’ve discovered about us humans and uncertainty in all your research?

Dr. Cindi Baldi

So I think what surprised me is uncertainty plays like a huge silent role in so many of the decisions that we make and the important decisions, like which groups and hobbies and organizations we decide to work for.

Like, we basically are largely choosing, in a way, to minimize our uncertainty, including our career path. I mean, like most people I talk to, including myself, when you talk to them, there’s a story back there on how they chose their path, and it’s usually because the path was more visible to them than any others.

So I grew up in an entrepreneurial family, and I even went to get a PhD and went that track but, ultimately, still went back to entrepreneurship. And it was like a path that was more well known to me.

And then we’ve been in all sorts of hospitals and you talk to people in hospitals, and, inevitably, either they had somebody who was in the medical field and they saw the path, or somebody, themselves, or somebody they were really close to were really, really sick, and so they spent a tremendous amount of time around those people, and so the path became, you know, more visible to them.

And so I think that, to me, that’s the most interesting part about uncertainty. It’s just so much of our life is actually created around trying to reduce the uncertainty of life.

Pete Mockaitis
Cindi, that is a provocative assertion. I’m provoked. You have provoked me. Because I’m thinking, decisions are real important, in a way. And we’ve had Annie Duke on the show, the professional poker player, had a fabulous book, Thinking in Bets.

And, in many ways, our decisions are about the top thing that we want to get right. And in the universe, that is unpredictable, uncertain, luck, un-luck, showing up for us, what we decide is tremendously consequential, arguably the most important skill of them all.

And to hear that we are choosing, in a way, to minimize our uncertainty, my gut reaction is, “Huh, that doesn’t feel like the ‘optimal’ criterion we should be optimizing for in our decision-making.” And yet we often are. Can you share, do you have any intriguing research or studies that backs up that assertion further?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So there’s a classic researcher, Michael Hogg, and he’s the one who first turned me on to even thinking about uncertainty as the role. And, basically, to summarize what I recall about his research, is that the groups that can reduce our uncertainty are the ones that we’re most likely to actually identify with and identify strongly with.

And so, it’s this idea that drawing people into groups is often related to just at, like, “How much certainty can you provide?”

So you think about, and I’m going to be provocative here, I guess, because of the topic, but you think about religion.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah, I thought that first, yeah.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, so that is great, like that’s the fundamental uncertainty, “What happens on the other side?” And for people who are very uncomfortable with that uncertainty, to some degree, they are seeking out a religious group and they often very, very strongly identify with that religious group.

And if you talk to them, they’ll tell you they feel like they know what’s happening on the other side. So I have very religious people in my family, and they absolutely feel like they know where they’re going on the other side and that they know the rules in order to get in.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, I was thinking about that first in terms of that’s about as uncertain as it gets.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, it’s fundamental.

Pete Mockaitis
I mean, when you die, is there nothingness, eternal bliss, eternal torture? That’s the full. And it’s hard to know.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Or recycled. Or recycled.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, sure. Okay. Reincarnated, yeah. And so, in terms of, like, it’s hard to know in terms of with the evidence we have available tangibly in front of us. It’s hard to know and the consequences are about as epic as they get.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
As they get.

Pete Mockaitis
So, yeah, that is like max uncertainty. And folks in their religious communities often feel quite close, connected to those, and that’s intriguing. And then, I’m thinking about if someone is in, say, a volleyball league or bowling league, those bonds, they’re certainly more than zero, but the amount of uncertainty that’s being alleviated is much less.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I’m going to argue with you on that.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So, one of the things that I learned while at universities, I actually was at the University of Texas at Austin, when they were trying to figure out basically how to increase student retention, you know, like the freshmen that come in. They wanted to work on the number who leave shortly after entering.

And one of the things that they realized, they created these things that they called figs at the time. And I can’t remember what a fig actually means. But, basically, they broke students down into about 17 students and there were different tracks.

 And they would have for, like, I think the first two years, at least one, possibly more classes together. It was the same 17 people going through.

And those students, because they were able to form relationships very fast, were less likely to leave. And, oftentimes, like I just had somebody who we’re very close to. He just graduated high school in May, and his high school is literally eight people.

And as I’m sitting there in the audience, I’m like, “Oh, my God, he doesn’t actually know how to make friends because it was just, it’s eight people.” Like, you’re going to know everybody.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, yeah. It just happens.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah. And so when the graduation was over, I pulled him aside, I said, “Listen, you’re going to a big university. What you need to do in order to make it digestible is you need to join groups. Find the groups that you actually want to do and have similar interests with people, but that’s how you break down and feel connected to a university that’s that big, is that you find the groups.”

And so, you know, joining a volleyball team, you wouldn’t think, “Well, it’s a hobby and I don’t have to do that.” But it’s a way that you’re finding people that you’re hanging out with an awful lot, which reduces your uncertainty socially. Like, “I have people I can turn to. I don’t have to worry about whether or not I have to eat by myself if I’m uncomfortable eating by myself,” for instance.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I hear you, certainly. I guess, and if you’re in a context where you don’t know much of anyone, one hundred percent, I mean, any group will reduce a tremendous amount of uncertainty when you’re going from no group.

I was thinking in the context of grown folks living in their communities, it’s like, “Oh, maybe I’ll join a bowling league or a volleyball group.” And so those relationships are meaningful and valuable.

Though I’m guessing, most of the time, that’ll probably be not as intensely close than some other relationships which would reduce more uncertainty but that’s kind of speculative. But, understood, groups are hugely valuable in part because what they do is reduce all kinds of uncertainty for us.

And so, help us out. I understand, or at least I intuit and have heard before, that 2026 here, as we’re recording, seems to have, substantially, more uncertainty in it than, I don’t know, a decade ago, two, three, four decades ago. That’s the vibe I’m feeling. Is that the case from a research-driven perspective?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I don’t know that I have seen any research specifically that says it’s ramped up, but it seems to me, anecdotally, that the speed of change has just increased drastically. And, I mean, like the technological, to me, you look back historically, and we’ve had huge technological advancements that, certainly, like shifted everything underneath somebody’s feet.

You know, even just like think about like the airplane, right? Like, that shifts where you can actually go in a fundamental way that is extraordinary. And then that opens up all sorts of opportunities, and not to mention resources.

And so we’ve certainly had that before, but it seems like the velocity of the change has increased. And that’s really what we’re talking about, is that every time there’s change, that creates uncertainty because we don’t really know how that change is going to impact all the different elements of our life, and we’re scrambling to keep up with that.

And it just seems like that’s the case. And then you look at AI and we’re in the middle of it, and it seems like it’s going to be as big or bigger than the internet, and yet, we don’t really fully understand how everything that’s going to change. I mean, like you can pontificate on it.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, sure. And they love to.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Exactly. But if there’s no room for humans for jobs, just think about the impact of that. That’s like the most extreme, right? Then if robots are doing everything, if AI is doing everything, then our whole economic system, every economic system that we have a concept of out there – capitalism, socialism, communism – all of it doesn’t work.

And so that’s the potential for huge uncertainty. What would work with that? And I’m not saying that that’s what’s going to happen.

But that’s probably the most extreme case in terms of uncertainty and what would happen. And the only thing that I can say about that is, “Well, we’re all on the same boat, so we’ll be all going through it together.”

Pete Mockaitis

That’s true. That’s true.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
No one will have an advantage.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, no one knows what the future holds. And I find that so irritating when folks speak with such certainty about things that are fundamentally uncertain – the future. It’s like you could present some scenarios, yeah, but any or none or all of them could come to pass.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Right. And we just need to be in a place where we can be adaptable. And some of that is being able to manage yourself when there’s uncertainty around you. And so I think that’s why the book is timely. We didn’t make it for that. I mean, AI happened after we wrote it. And so it was just a happy accident.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, yeah, if it wasn’t AI, it’d be something, you know? Fill in the blank. Pandemic, revolutionary technology, geopolitical tumult, there’s always something. And so in your book, you mentioned that when we feel uncertain, we tend to do a couple suboptimal things. Can you lay those out for us?

Dr. Cindi Baldi

I think the big thing is that it impacts our decision-making where it really causes us to skew to the negative side. And so when there’s uncertainty, we’re more worried about threats. Like, it’s almost evolutionary, right? Like, we’re here because our ancestors paid attention to the sound in the bushes and survived.

And so the problem with that, with uncertainty, is that that means that if it’s skewing us to only consider the negative, then we’re missing the opportunities. And anytime there’s change, there’s opportunities.

Anybody who can figure out how to leverage change or solve a problem, and change creates lots of problems, both of those are opportunities. And so the brain automatically shuts down into focusing on the negative and, in doing that, we also become more risk-averse.

So we try to protect what we have instead of taking, so everything’s going in the wrong direction. You almost have to force yourself to open up. And a lot of that is trying to force yourself into curiosity.

It seems to be the best way in order to open back up your brain is to start asking questions just to satisfy curiosity. Start running experiments that allow you enough risk to be able to get more information.

Like, if you look at it instead of, “I’m taking a risk,” you look at it instead of, “I’m going to learn something,” and set up the experiments to be able to do that, then you’re sort of biting away at the uncertainty, while also effectively coping with it.

Because there are also people who go to the other extreme with uncertainty where they’re like, some people will shut down, like they literally just shut down. The brain shuts down, their actions shut down, they kind of freeze.

And then there will be people who hate uncertainty so much that they’ll try to take control. And like you said before, they’ll be like, “This is going to happen,” and then take actions about it when they actually don’t have enough information.

And so the smaller moves with the focus on experimentation and learning seem to be the best way to sort of like chisel away at uncertainty.

Pete Mockaitis
I love that idea of the smaller moves that focus on experimentation and learning are so key. One of my favorite stories in this zone is I’m thinking about Tony Hsieh when he started Zappos.

Now we’re all very comfortable buying shoes online. But if we go back in time, there was a time where it was genuinely unknown, “Is anybody going to want to buy a shoe online? I mean, you got to try them on, for goodness sake. How could you buy a pair of shoes without knowing how they feel, what it’s like when you walk around in them? Is it tight in weird places that you don’t want it tight, or too loose,” all the things, the support on your arch, you know? Like, how could you possibly determine that?

So what he did was he moseyed over to a shoe store and said, “Can I take pictures of your shoes? And if I sell them online, I’ll pay you for the shoes and then I’ll ship them to folks.” And they said, “Okay. Nothing lost on our side,” says the shoe store owner.

And from a strictly, like profit-and-loss perspective, this is a terrible business move because you’re not making any profit if you’re buying the shoes at retail price and then selling them at the same retail price and doing the work and the shipping. It’s, like, a terrible financial operation, but a pristinely beautiful learning operation.

And, sure enough, he was able to see, “By golly, when you make the return process easy and free and guaranteed, folks are totally cool with buying shoes online. Well, I guess we’re off to the races.”

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Right. And you see that with so many things. I mean, like, we’re both wearing eyeglasses. Like Zenni is a great opportunity to buy a cheap pair of eyeglasses.

This is, again, something you’re used to trying on. And so what did they do? They gave you, like, a face thing that you put in there and then you could try on the different shapes, and so you kind of get a sense. And then you could send them back if they didn’t work. All of that is to reduce uncertainty, to reduce the barriers that uncertainty puts up with adoption.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay, so that’s a good move in terms of thinking about doing these experiments. Could you share with us some additional stories and perspectives for folks who were feeling the uncertainty, they were at risk for making some foolish decisions, and then, ultimately, what tactics and strategies they used to prevail under those conditions?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So the one that comes to immediate mind is somebody we’ve coached who really wasn’t happy in their job but, at the same time, they were reluctant to retire. It wasn’t necessarily like the organization itself. It’s, like, they were, I think I would say, fundamentally, bored with what they were doing and they’d been doing it for a while.

So it wasn’t an organizational issue. It was more like a lot of people at about seven years. Actually, it’s like the seven-year itch of, like, work. And so they were at that point where they’re like, “Well, if I retire, I can then do this nonprofit that I can work in, I can volunteer in this nonprofit, and it’ll really fulfill me.”

But they were afraid to make the step because that’s a big deal, like retiring and not having money and going into a nonprofit. And I think we started out with the initial conversation was, “What if instead you work for them, and then they’re like, ‘Well, you know.’” There were things that why they wanted to stay, like better healthcare. There were issues that were keeping them in the organization.

Then I’m like, “All right, what if you, basically, do sort of a side hustle with this nonprofit where, like, you get used to them, you get to see whether or not what you’re offering is valuable to them, you get a sense for, like, being in that space while still maintaining this job? And so you’re running an experiment and then you can switch over.” And that worked very well.

And so they, basically, like, worked on the side hustle for about a year in this nonprofit, and they did, in fact, love it. And the nonprofit made enough room for them.

I think, initially, the nonprofit couldn’t really give them, like, a full time job. And, certainly, they were not replacing everything that this person was earning in the organization. And that was also part of the calculation is, like, “How much do you need in order to be able to do this?”

And so they were able to slide into that, see the reality, what it would be like, and then eventually they moved on over. But they weren’t going to do it before that. They were going to wait until they hit, you know, 70, which was a number of years away, and get the full retirement and then do this thing that they wanted. And that’s a lot of years of being bored.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, it sure is. Well, that’s a great story and, yes, I’m all for it. You know, your subtitle is “14 Strategies for Work Success in a Chaotic World.” Cindi, if I could put you on the spot, could I have you give us the lightning fast overview of the strategy, one or two sentences for what that is, and then we’ll dig into where it seems the juiciest?

Dr. Cindi Baldi

Okay.

Pete Mockaitis

So, first, “Get a hold of yourself.”

Dr. Cindi Baldi
It’s basically just getting a hold of your emotions. That’s what we’re really talking about. And because uncertainty, again, does spike a lot of negative emotions, and so we have some practical tools in that chapter that help you basically step back.

My favorite in the chapter is the 10-10-10 rule, where you’re in a situation and maybe, like, you’re on the cusp of overreacting or possibly doing some damage to a relationship. And the rule is, “Ask yourself if in 10 hours, 10 days, or 10 weeks this is even going to matter.”

And you sort of like talk yourself through what that looks like, how you feel about this particular situation. And you could do different increments, but it’s basically pulling out in time, “Is this even going to matter?” And when you do that, a lot of things go away.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Thank you. And strategy two, “Convert experience into wisdom.”

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So this chapter, “Convert experience to wisdom,” is just the fundamental flaw that we’re all very busy. And in being busy, we don’t do a whole lot of reflecting. And if we’re not doing any reflecting, we’re not doing any learning.

And if we’re not doing the reflecting when it comes to uncertainty, we’re not actually getting better at assessing our ability to predict and take risks. And so you have to set aside time in order to do your after-action review and see what you could have done better, what you did well, how you might change going forward.

I mean, we do this, like, personally all the time in our business. Like, every single time we put a proposal together and go out, and whether we get it and then more information comes in, or we don’t get it, we’re like, “Okay, what could we have done different? Did we do the right thing?”

Because sometimes no deal is a deal, “Did we do the right thing? How could we improve our odds next time? What would we pursue differently?” So, like, any time that you’re going through something, especially with uncertainty, because you don’t even know what you don’t know with uncertainty, but, like, “How might I have actually been able to tackle this a little bit smarter?”

Pete Mockaitis
I like that a lot. It’s necessary to learn or you’re just going to keep doing the same thing. And we’ve had guests talk about having a decision journal or whatnot, or just a regular process, especially if you have a recurring thing that’s happening.

We had a pastor, who said every Monday, they discuss what went down on the Sunday and how could they make it better and better and better. And so you just got 52 shots at improvement every year that you can go to a really cool place.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
That you’re actually getting. Because you could also get up and talk 52 times in a year and do no reflection, and you’re definitely not going to get any better. We have somebody who works for us, and she works for us because when we first started out, she was in the room and we asked her to take notes and she gave us, like, each, like 10 pages of notes.

Like, she’s paying attention to the audience and what they were reacting to and our weird micro expressions and, you know, like buggy eyes or like weird little gestures that you do. Like, every speaker has like those little things that they do.

And, like, she had it all down, and it was fantastic. Like, we periodically have her go to gigs just to do that because she’s so observant and so good at giving feedback. But, otherwise, you just continue on with the quirk.

Pete Mockaitis

Yeah, certainly. And even if you’re doing it but it’s only your own perspective, you’re not seeing some stuff. So I like that a lot. And, third, “Place your bets.”

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So, I mean, this is, again, about like risk assessment, of course, and just the fact that, like, when we have something to lose, we become risk-averse. It’s Kahneman’s work, Kahneman and Tversky’s work.

And so there’s danger in that. Like, what we see in organizations is people who have something, like they may have made a certain level and it’s kind of, it’s a life that fits the image, enough of the image of what they thought they would get, right? So they feel like they have something.

And so they don’t take the risk to maybe pursue a promotion, or a different track of learning, or even just a higher position, whether in that organization or a different organization, because they’re afraid of rocking the boat and missing what they have.

And so we see a number of people on the “I have something and I’m risk-averse,” side inside organizations. Like, “I know I’m not really happy but I have this and it gives me a comfortable life, it gives me the life that fits my expectations, and I want to be able to hold on to that.”

“Because what if I go to a different organization and it looks better from the outside, but I get in there and I’m miserable, I’m more miserable than I am right now?” And so they stay. They stay in misery instead of taking that chance.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. Thank you. If you could highlight for me, what are a couple strategies here that are just transformationally fantastic for people that we just have to talk about?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So I like “explore and exploit” a great deal, and there’s this just art in building something which would be like explore, and then not getting so enamored on the explore that we forget to, like, exploit it.

And I know exploit has a negative connotation, but in this case, I mean, I’ve worked with somebody who did photo booths, like the live video booths that we now see everywhere. And they were constantly buying new equipment, and that’s very expensive.

And so they’re always experimenting, trying to like up the game with the equipment, instead of buying a set, like having a good set, and then spending the time to figure out how to leverage that and, basically, get your money back on it.

And so that’s the exploit phase. Like, the explore phase is, “Hey, this is really cool technology. And what should I use? And I’m going to buy something.” And then the exploit is, “Okay, I have this and I’m going to go for a while, understanding that, like, even as I breathe, this thing is like getting outdated,” because that’s what technology is.

And so you’re trying to do both of those things where, like, you get enough of bang for your buck on the exploit side to be able to fund the explore side. And with uncertainty, a lot of the time, you either get people who, like, really fall for the curiosity and the learning, and they don’t come out of the explore, or you get the people who get so accustomed.

And this, I think, is the more common. You get people who are so used to the existing system that they have that they don’t upgrade when they should. So I’ll give you a practical example from, actually, my own family.

So my parents, they own a drive-in movie theater. And we just had a celebration for somebody who was important in our community who passed away. And so we hosted free movies for everybody.

And so I’m sitting out there, I’m walking around the cars, I’m talking to everybody, and I’m sitting there, and we have these digital projectors that we’ve had since we were forced to go digital projectors, which was a huge investment.

And I’m watching a movie, and I’m like, “Our movie is crap. Like, it’s not good enough.” And so, like, it was a huge investment. You had to take it out a long time. We probably have had them double the lifespan. And so we did the exploit part.

And so now I’m back into, “Okay, what are my options to up the game here so that way we have a good picture?” And that throws off all sorts of uncertainty because that, again, changes the financial dynamics of a business that doesn’t have a whole lot of roof on it.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s a drive-in. It’s, literally, roofless.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Well, exactly. Except for the snack bar and the projection booth. But so, like, it’s that kind of pull-and-play that you’re dealing with. I also see it with just this country. Like, we just came back from China, and this country is still in the phase of exploiting our existing transportation systems, our existing technology.

I mean, you go to China, Japan, South Korea, or Singapore, and there’s no wait at their equivalent TSA. There’s, like, one dude working there, you walk up, it scans your face, you walk through. And it works perfectly.

Then you look at the US, like, obviously, we have the technology, but we’re still stuck in the old way. And we have to switch from exploit into explore. So there’s that one.

Pete Mockaitis
Cindi, I like this so much. It is a balancing act and it is an art because, I think, it’s a bit of a reality check for me personally. Like, I really like exploring. It’s fun. It’s new. It’s innovative. It’s intriguing. And I could get down the rabbit hole of, well, now, for example, there’s all these speech-to-text tools that are so much better than they used to be for productivity.

Like, back in the day, Dragon NaturallySpeaking, no offense, was terrible and I hated it. And so now there’s all these things, like Whispr Flow and Aqua Voice, and like a dozen other pieces like it. And it’s, like, I could spend all day playing with them, testing their accuracy.

And it’s not really worth it, right, because it’s like, “They’re all pretty good now. You could probably just grab one in 20 minutes of research and call it good.” And yet, I just really enjoy the exploring. It’s fun, interesting, and intriguing.

But in order to really be effective, we’ll need to do a good bit of exploiting. And then come one, two, three years from now, it’s probably well worth it to take a look back into the explore phase and say, “Hey, this app has been delightful for me, but, you know, are they still the top of the heap or should I be looking around for at for something else right now that can do it even better or at a lower price?”

But then, again, you could do that, I’m thinking of AI, in particular. Like, everyday, I think it’s literally everyday, there is a new development of some kind.

And you could spend your whole working life exploring all the cool, fun, new, interesting things in the universe of AI, and maybe that’s great if you run an AI YouTube channel and you’re sharing that and that’s great.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I think that’s how some people have handled it.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, but for most of us, no, you just kind of got to know, “Oh, that thing will be useful for me. I’m going to go ahead and bring that into my life, my workflows, and then just, like, peek my head up from time to time to get a sense of, “Is there anything game-changingly new that I should be using? All these YouTube thumbnails seem to be suggesting it is, but actually is it?”

And so, yeah, boy, you can really marinate in that one. Like, “What is the correct balance of explore/exploit given the life cycle and what I’m trying to achieve, and the landscape around me and how it’s evolved?”

Dr. Cindi Baldi

And I want to tie that back to what I had initially said with, like, dealing with the negativity when uncertainty sets in and sort of being like frozen. The remedy to that is the curiosity. And so the remedy is explore. And once you get into it, you love it. You might have uncertainty about going to, say, like a foreign country or even just a city that you haven’t been to.

Like when I say I’m going to New York City, like there are people who are petrified of that. But you go, and like it’s amazing. It’s an amazing city. There’s a ton of stuff that’s really cool to do there. And you start getting all these ideas of bringing home like, “How can I use this in my daily life? Or how can I use this in work?”

And it’s that level of explore that then kicks off all these other ideas, and so it’s very enticing. Once you get yourself into it, you have to make sure that you don’t just perpetually stay in it. You have to do something with it.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s great. Okay. Well, now can you share with us the notion of “Striking the right balance”?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
So “Striking the right balance,” I believe, without looking inside the chapter, I believe that that’s the one that I would call getting a hold of, like, your brain, like mental management, basically, because, again, curiosity causes us to flip to the negative side. And so it kicks off things like negative rumination, right?

And we want to practice possible scenarios, but we don’t want to be stuck, like, constantly going over the possible negative scenario over and over again. We want to also practice positive scenarios, right? Practice is a good thing.

I grew up, again, in a drive-in movie theater at a very young age. I won’t tell you how young, because my parents weren’t paying attention. I was the fourth one. So I like to say that they ran out of energy. So, like, I was watching horror movies very young.

And, like, a lot of people would be horrified at that – horror movie, horrified. But in life, I’ll say that having watched horror movies actually has a good application because I’ve thought through some, like, dire situations, right?

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, you’re ready. When the slasher comes your way, you know what to do.

Dr. Cindi Baldi

Yeah, I am. There was somebody who, like, was in my house one time.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, dear.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, I know. It was very scary. It was the middle of the night. The dog woke me up. And the first thing I said was, “I know not to go down and investigate and ask them what they’re doing in here.”

But, you know, like you’ve thought it through because of the experience of watching, or that you’ve intentionally practiced, whether it’s a conversation, like a high-stakes conversation, or a high-stakes situation that you’re walking into, that you’ve practiced both the downside and the upside.

And it’s true, you may get neither, but it’s in the practicing that it builds, A, your confidence. But, B, like, it’s sometimes surprising, the little nuggets that you practice in advance that are helpful.

So the practice is good. The downside is, if you keep spinning that situation, whether it’s a possible future situation or a past situation that actually did happen, and you’re spinning it in your brain over and over again and ruminating.

And so this part of the chapter is like, “How do you do the mental management to basically make sure that when uncertainty kicks off rumination on you, which it has a tendency to do, how do you get out of that?”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, Cindi, two things. First, we have to know what happened with the dude in your house?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Oh, sure. So this is when I was really young. I was in college. So I, first, closed my door and locked it, and then walked over to the window to see if maybe, perhaps, it was my roommate coming home in the middle of the night, and then my knees went out from underneath me because her car wasn’t there and I knew it wasn’t her.

And so then, because this is the days of landlines, I, fortunately, had a yellow lab who had eaten the answering machine that sat downstairs with the phone. So who was in my house had to go up past my room to get to the landline extension. And they must have figured out that like I was talking.

So I had time to basically pick up the phone and call the police. And then while I’m on the phone with the police, they picked up. I heard them click.

Pete Mockaitis
Whoa!

Dr. Cindi Baldi

Yeah. And then they jumped out the balcony.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, so they knew the police were coming and they got the hell out of there. But I was very lucky.

Pete Mockaitis
Did they take anything?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
No, no, they didn’t take anything.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, I’m glad you’re safe and well.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I owe that to the dog.

Pete Mockaitis
Thank you, dog. Okay. So we just had to close that loop.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I understand.

Pete Mockaitis
Secondly, when it comes to rumination, how do you stop it?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I mean, obviously meditation, but I would rather put like a pencil through my eyeball than meditate. It’s just, like, not really for me. I do recognize that it really is very helpful and people who can do it and enjoy it, I grant you all the power in the world.

The ways that I do it, I do it in two different ways that I find effective for people. The first is doing a level of exercise that is a little bit stressful, but mostly comfortable.

It’s, like, not at the point where you’re struggling, but, like, your brain can basically stop thinking. You’re like almost on an autopilot, but it’s occupied enough with, like, the strain where it doesn’t have excess resources to go bouncing around thinking about other things.

And I find that to be almost a form of meditation, so I can do that swimming or walking. And then the other one I find to be very helpful is diving into somebody else’s world. So fiction, picking up a fiction book and basically diving into somebody else’s world causes your world inside your head to shut off.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. And I think there’s science suggesting it’s best to do that with paper, if you can, as opposed to another screen.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I don’t know. I don’t think I’ve seen that. Definitely for writing. I’ll have to look up the reading one, though. That’s interesting. I know that there’s research on reading that basically it really ramps up your empathy.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. But, as far as you’re concerned, personally, it’s like you’re down reading fiction any way you find it.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah. And other people, like it’s basically, like we run that exercise in groups, it’s anything that just gets you almost into flow. So anything that you really enjoy, because flow is basically you lose track of time and you’re just in the moment. And so your brain is just in the moment. It’s not thinking about a possible future or a past that you didn’t like.

And when you quiet down the brain, even for periods of time, when you come back out of it, you’re just more in control over it. I mean, I think that’s why people really do like meditation as it gives them a level of control over their brain, that without practicing it they didn’t have.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Cindi, I like these notions a lot. And I’m thinking, I think it was Kwame Christian, a guest of the show, who talked about forced mindfulness. He was talking about in the context of jujitsu. He’s like, “You know what? When there’s a large man choking you, you can’t help but be very present to what’s happening in front of you.” I was like, “Yeah, that makes sense. That makes a lot of sense.”

And I think about that for cold plunges, in terms of, like, my mind could be going in all kinds of directions, and then I get in some cold water and all my mind is going is, “Whoo!” you know? Like, all other thoughts have ceased and I like it a lot.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, I like that. I like the cold plunge example. That’s good. I like actually the being strangled one, in jujitsu one. Like, specifically, jujitsu.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Okay, so you can meditate, you can read fiction, you can do jujitsu, cold plunge.

Dr. Cindi Baldi

There’s a lot of ways. It’s what works for you.

Pete Mockaitis
There’s a lot of ways that you shut down rumination hard and have no choice but to engage with the present.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
And so, like, that’s the thing. There’s probably endless numbers of ways that individuals do it. It’s just paying attention to what works for you.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Beautiful. Well, Cindi, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
I think the only other thing that I would like to mention is sort of circling back to one of our original conversations about uncertainty driving group affiliation, is think about the groups that are really important to you and if there’s uncertainty there, what is it that you are trying to avoid? Like, is there a better way to manage that uncertainty? Because I just think it’s wonderful to be part of groups for a social component.

But you always have to counterbalance that with how much power do they have over you and your thinking, and even, like, the data that you process, like the information that you process? It has a huge impact over people.

And so we should, intentionally, periodically, look around at the groups that we belong to, and think, “Why this group? What uncertainty is it solving? Is there another way for me to solve that uncertainty or get comfortable with the uncertainty? And am I okay with how much power that this group has over me?”

Pete Mockaitis

Beautiful. Thank you.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
You’re welcome.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
You know, I have, like, a partial quote. I think it was from Pope. And it was, “Drink deep or taste not the Pierian Spring.” And I know that there was more context to it, but, basically, what it’s saying is like, you know, we’re never going to know everything. Drink what you can, drink deeply, but then you have to take action.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite book?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Kent Nerburn, Simple Truths.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key nugget you share that seems to really connect and resonate with folks, they quote it back to you often?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
You know, I was talking to my counterpart, who’s, he’s behind the scenes, Jack. And the tripwire seems to actually, we talk about tripwires in the book. And, basically, like a tripwire is an if-then statement, like, “If this happens, then I will do this.” But it’s, like, the pre-planning of when you will take action.

So, for example, if you’re going to delegate something, and you’re worried about the delegation, like, the tripwire is, “How much room am I going to give for this person to, like, experiment and sort of like adapt to the delegation? And what do they need to do in order to trip a wire where I’m going to jump in?” That would be like an example.

So it gives people a little bit of space to be able to, like, learn and screw up, and you’re not, like, overreacting to everything.

Pete Mockaitis
Beautiful. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Well, I mean, I have my own podcast, which you were on. Thank you very much for doing that. We’re Management Muse. And then I’m also available on Culsure.com, which, yeah, I got to spell the culsure because it’s very close to another word. So it’s C-U-L-S-U-R-E.com,  and all the contact information is there.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Well, I think my final call to action is, step one, think bigger right now, because you probably have just settled down into, like, a routine and life is busy and you’re not really shaking it up. And also uncertainty may be, like, holding you down a little bit. So think bigger about the possibilities for you, and then start asking.

Because what we tend to find is people, think if they work hard that they’ll get recognized and the organization will promote them fairly. But the problem is that an organization is smaller at the top than the bottom. And so if you want any shot at movement, you have to go in and ask.

And, yeah, it’s true, you may not get it right away, you may not get it at all, but if the people above you know that you’re interested in it, they’re probably going to do some things to help you get there even if, ultimately, you don’t get there through them.

So that’s my advice, is that make sure you get out there and ask.

Pete Mockaitis
And you have a story of someone who doubled their salary via asking, and it wasn’t even that hard. Tell us that story.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Yeah, so I do have that story. And so I will say that it’s been surprising just how much ground we can get by asking. And so this one particular woman, her job had expanded to be multiple positions. So people in the organization quit and she was extremely capable, and so they kept on adding a workload onto her.

And then that thing was really happening and, like, they weren’t offering up a salary because, largely, the CEO, which I don’t really agree with this, but CEO was like, “Hey, it’s market rate. If she’s willing to take it then it’s fair.” That was that was his perception.

Pete Mockaitis
I don’t know. Fair is not the word. If she’s willing to take it, then you’re getting away with it. I wouldn’t call it fair.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Right. I agree with you. I don’t agree with that. And, in fact, in fairness to the number two of that organization, he literally was, like, “Help her figure out how to ask.”

And so, you know, I was getting her mentally ready for the asking, and it was frightening for her. But, again, she had, like, three jobs that she was holding down in this one organization.

And so then we started like, basically trying to get the added value by, basically, doing these three things together, we did our best to try to piece together evidence to support what we were going to ask for, figure out what we were going to ask for, and then ask for it.

And then we practiced it and practiced it and she went in and she was very nervous, but she asked for double her salary and he said, “Done,” like didn’t even argue. So in that CEO’s defense, it really was about, like, what you’re willing to accept.

Like, he knew he was getting a deal. He wasn’t going to offer up the raise unless she felt like she wasn’t getting a deal.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Ask.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
Ask and do your homework, but prepare to ask.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Cindi, thank you.

Dr. Cindi Baldi
You’re welcome.

1188: How to Feel Extra Prepared and Confident for Any Presentation with Kerri Garbis

By Podcasts No Comments

Kerri Garbis breaks down how to make your communication more effective by making your practice more effective.

You’ll Learn

  1. The three stages to prepare for any kind of speaking
  2. Quick techniques to help reduce your nervousness
  3. Why practice feels boring—and how to fix it

About Kerri

Kerri Garbis is the CEO and founder of Ovation Communication, a firm that trains global business leaders in the nuanced arts of Professional Presence and Speaker Development. A certified Business Etiquette and Emotional Intelligence expert and seasoned Professional Speechwriter, her expertise culminates in her book Presentation Skills for Managers, published by McGraw-Hill.

Evolving from a professional actress as a kid to empowering today’s business professionals, Kerri’s journey weaved through The Baltimore School For The Arts to Syracuse University, where she graduated with a BFA in Musical Theatre. She shares her actionable insights on effective preparation and presentation in her widely-viewed TEDx Talk, “How To Rehearse Anything.”

Offstage, Kerri’s quest for the quintessential French fry mirrors her approach to professional excellence. She notes that “sometimes it’s a sprinkle of salt that makes all the difference.”

Resources Mentioned

Pete Mockaitis
Kerri, welcome!

Kerri Garbis
Thank you. Welcome to you.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, thank you. I feel welcome. I’m excited to learn about speaking, presenting, performing, rehearsing better. Could you maybe kick us off with – since you’ve had the cool experience working on professional presence and speaking better – any intriguing discovery you’ve made that the rest of us just got to know?

Kerri Garbis
The intriguing discovery that everybody has to know about presence, speaker prep, is you are better when you rehearse. And if you are rehearsing correctly, you cannot over-rehearse.

I was just in an event yesterday, a virtual event where I was speaking yesterday, and there were a lot of side conversations about, “I don’t rehearse,” “It doesn’t work for me,” “I sound bored,” “I get overprepared,” and I am here to dispel that rumor. Boom! Dispelled it.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. It was like a magical spell. It was dispelling this rumor.

Kerri Garbis
It’s dispelled.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So, well, that sounds intriguing. It’s funny because, on the one hand, I think I am a master at rationalizing less effort in my life. And, in a way, and no offense, this is just a friendly challenge to anyone who’s adopted this perspective, it’s like, “Oh, if I rehearse, then I’m not going to be natural and fresh and intriguing.”

And, I guess, there’s some smidgens, potentially, of truth to that notion, but in my experience, I am better when I rehearse, and that’s your discovery as well. So tell us, what is the truth or the misconception underlying this notion of, “Oh, I’m fresher and actually better if I don’t rehearse”?

Kerri Garbis
Rehearsal, sometimes, for some folks can mean, “I’m just going to repeat the same thing over and over and do it the same way over and over and not really think about it other than what I’m saying.”

And I would agree that rehearsing like that, which isn’t really rehearsal, I would call that repeating, is only going to compound any distracting habits that you might have or distracting things that are going to distract the audience from what’s coming out of your mouth.

And if you’re rehearsing, which means, “Each iteration that I say this thing out loud,” and it has to be out loud, because, by the way, rehearsing in your head is like, “I’m going to learn how to swim,” and then not actually getting in the pool, you’re just going to think about it.

So you have to say the words out loud, and out loud with a certain goal. And, yes, you’ll repeat the words, although we often recommend that you don’t. We always recommend that you don’t memorize the script because most folks, unlike me, aren’t actors, right?

I am. I happen to be an actor since I was a little kid. Most business professionals that we work with are not actors so don’t memorize. Memorize your roadmap where you know where you’re going. Rehearse with accountability, meaning saying it out loud with a certain goal.

And that could be a goal of, “I’m going to have really great open body language,” or, “I’m going to do it this time and try not to use any fillers,” or, “I’m going to do it this time and really try to ignite or excite my audience and try to get them to do what I want them to do.” That is rehearsing with accountability, rehearsing with a goal.

And then once you get on on stage, whatever the stage is, and you’ve got an audience, you can’t just simply repeat what you’ve done. You will sound dull. You will be bored. You have to present or, I think, you said earlier, perform with a goal in mind. And the goal should always be about the audience and what you want them to do.

Pete Mockaitis
Say more about that, “You will be bored.”

Kerri Garbis
Yes, if you’re repeating what you’ve done, if I am saying the same thing over and over and over again, and I’m moving the same way because I rehearsed my arms, right, I say, “Welcome to…” I’m doing a really over-the-top gesture that nobody would do, hopefully, in real life.

“Welcome to my presentation about XYZ,” and I’ve practiced this 700 times, I am physically bored, I’m mentally bored because repetition can get boring. And you, as the speaker, need to have a goal that is out of you, off your head, right out of your head, and to the audience.

So know your goal and what you want them to do, ideally, what you want them to feel. Unfortunately, we can’t get anybody to feel anything specific. We can deliver the information in a way that hedges our best bet to try to get them there.

And make sure that goal is always in the back of the room in which you’re presenting, or behind the camera, or behind the head of the person that you’re talking to. You’re always trying to work towards something, and that’s going to keep you less bored.

I mean, as actors, we face this. If we’re in a long run of something, we face this often. I did the same show for 50 weeks in a row, eight shows a week. That can get boring. Or, 500 years ago when I used to perform in theme park shows, and we were doing the same show six times a day, it can get boring because you’re repeating the same thing over and over again.

So you have to give yourself little tricks and little goals each time. So, “Hey, this show, I’m going to concentrate on making sure my arms are straight in all my dance moves,” or, “This show, I’m going to really try to connect to this character or make this emotion the most prominent one that I’m showing during the show to keep it not bored,” because your audience is seeing it or hearing it for the first time.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, what’s so fun when you say, “Say the words out loud with a goal and you change up the goal and, thus, you get less bored,” it’s funny, I’m thinking about the world of video games here, an activity people undertake to eliminate boredom.

Kerri Garbis
I’ve heard.

Pete Mockaitis
And there are these things called mods, modifications, that you can install. It’s like, “I’ve played this game 400 times, but I want to play it, but I’ve done it so many times, it’s not interesting. Oh, there’s a modification so now it is new again.”

And so, likewise, if you say the words again, that feels boring because you’ve been there, done that. And yet, adding a new goal is like a new modification, and suddenly, it’s a new adventure.

And I think about, when I’ve been in zones of doing a lot of keynoting and rehearsing, I would find, sure enough, I’ve done this keynote like 30 times, but if I picked a new goal, it really was interesting.

Like, sometimes, the goal would be, “I’m going to make eye contact with people for approximately a phrase or sentence before making eye contact with the next person for a phrase or a sentence.”

And what’s really kind of fun is I can’t even begin to think about such things until the content itself is deep in my bones. It’s, like, I’ve got so much mental bandwidth that has to be allocated, and if 90% of it is on, “Oh, what am I saying next?” then there’s not much left over to do much of anything else but say those words.

Kerri Garbis
Yes, and I love your technique. I love this idea of mods. I might borrow it. I don’t play video games, but I know people who do, so.

Pete Mockaitis
Sure. All right.

Kerri Garbis
And, absolutely, you want to get it to a point where it, ideally, if you can, in your bones. And I often talk about rehearsal is so freeing because, if we’re rehearsed, it’s in there. It’s in my muscle memory. Not memorized. It’s in my muscle memory, the roadmap of where I’m going is memorized.

And then, all of a sudden, you can do eye contact to different people in the audience. You can feel a little freer to maybe take an interrupting question in the middle, or even, advanced, you can modify your message or how you’re delivering it if the reaction that you’re getting is not what you want.

If I’m telling the same story or giving out the same information for the 25th time in six months, and my audience, all of a sudden, I see is very closed off and looking down or, even worse, the dreaded, like, looking into their phone, that’s the worst as a speaker.

I know because I’m not reading the content off my brain. I’m able to actually look at them and take in what they’re doing and then I’m able to, like, mix it up and mod in the moment.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, there you go. Tweet that. Okay.

Kerri Garbis
Trademark.

Pete Mockaitis
So that’s really cool and, you’re right, like, we have to have some bandwidth available to observe the reactions and adjust. And I think it’s so fascinating how it’s easy to not do that.

And I’ve had the experience of watching a speaker deliver a presentation multiple times. And I’m thinking, “Well, oh, are you still doing that? It didn’t work the last time. Why haven’t you given that up?” It’s, like, “I guess I should probably share this with them so that they have this.”

And I think that it’s something I observe frequently. And you haven’t done this, Kerri, so I’m not implicating you in this. But I think what I find tricky is, and it’s harder on podcasts, and maybe I’m just a snob who’s spoiled now, you know, 1200-ish episodes in, like I’ve heard a lot of things, I’ve read a lot of things.

But when I hear…oh, man, when I hear people say things, like they say it with great enthusiasm and almost like a twinkle in their eye as though they think they’re saying something novel, useful, and interesting, but, in fact, they are not.

And that’s very hard to say to someone unless they ask, like, “I’d really like your feedback.” It’s like, “Oh, so glad you asked. You know, you were doing this thing.” Because it could be a real gut punch, like, “Hey, sorry, what you say is not novel, useful, or interesting, though you seem to believe it is, so it’s either you’re delusional or you’re you’re talking to the wrong audience.”

And this is so brutal, like, I never say this unless people ask. But I had a joke. For example, I was my college of business at the University of Illinois commencement speaker, and I had a little joke I made, which was people say, “Oh, you’re the speaker. What’s your speech going to be about?”

And here’s what I would say, and I think that this is applicable to many speakers today, is I would say something like, “Okay, check it out. So here we are, we’re graduating, right? So it’s like, ‘Oh, it’s kind of sad, it’s the end.’ But, no, check it out. I’m going to take that, I’m going to flip it on its head. ‘Graduation is actually a beginning,’ and get this, ‘That’s why they call it commencement.’”

And so that was my joke, because, like, that’s the most trite, overdone kind of graduation speech thing one could say. And that was kind of fun, I would see my true friends would be like, “Ha, ha. But, really, what’s your speech going to be about?”

And then those who aren’t so friendly with you, who don’t feel comfortable giving you feedback would say, “Oh, okay,” you know, they would say nothing. And so that’s a long example for, I think, this is problematic in that a lot of times people think they have something really amazing and they say it with that intonation.

And that’s more engaging than if they were monotone boring. But it’s like, “Oh, man, they’re really kind of missing the boat. Like, they don’t know that in the marketplace of ideas, what they’re saying isn’t special or worthwhile for us audience to be assembled around.”

Kerri Garbis
Are you saying that – so this is not about me, I understand. Okay.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah.

Kerri Garbis
I’m just checking that this is not about me, because I have a business that teaches this. We’ve been doing it for 15 years. I can’t say that anything that we do or talk about is that perhaps people haven’t heard before because what we do is antiquated. It’s been around a very, very long time.

Actors teaching, well, the business professionals part is specific. Actors teaching humans how to present themselves more confidently and speak in a more authoritative way is not a new concept. I did not create it. Yes, I created this company. The original idea, I did not create.

I try to share things that might be common sense, maybe not so much in common practice, and things that people don’t always think about. For example, do you practice in the mirror, ever?

Pete Mockaitis
I have. I prefer video recording.

Kerri Garbis
Yes, same seas. Because the mirror, it’s not an accurate representation of what’s happening, which is hilarious because it is. However, in the moment, our brain taking in us is very distracting and doesn’t give us back what we need, which watching back a video later can. It’s one of the many tools we use in our training.

And it’s the same thing when we tell folks, “In the moment, as much as you can, hide your self-view when you’re speaking, communicating virtually.” So we’re a Zoom house in my organization. So, in Zoom, it’s really easy to hit hide self-view.

Same in Teams, most of the platforms. Here in what we’re doing, I have moved my…I can’t see myself because I’m off to the side.

So I know that I look good, sound good. We discussed this before. And then I don’t need to look at myself anymore because it’s just using brain power to distract from the communication.

So the less you can, IRL, right, in real life, if you and I are not on camera here and we’re having a conversation, I am not looking at myself communicating with you. I’m only looking at you.

And so taking out not rehearsing in the mirror, taking out as much staring at myself as fabulous as my hair is, like, I don’t need it to be present and communicate in the most effective way.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, that’s really good. And to that notion of bandwidth, yet again, it’s like we need some bandwidth just to monitor the response of the other person, like, “Do I seem to be saying anything interesting or novel or intriguing to them? Or do they understand what I’m saying or are they just kind of confused?”

I think you got to have that bandwidth available, and so less on you from a mirror or from your Zoom windows, certainly, that’s really handy. So this is a nice big idea. Rehearsing helps. Rehearsing more helps more. Say the words out loud with a goal.

Pete Mockaitis
When it comes to this rehearsing, I’m curious, is there a magic number or amount you recommend?

Kerri Garbis

There’s no magical amount of time. The number, the magical number is three. If you say something out loud three times, different goals each time, that can really help you feel prepared.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. So three is magic as a threshold for, “You’ll feel pretty prepared after three.”

Kerri Garbis
Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And not to get too formulaic, I suppose the individual goals we select will vary based on our own strengths and weaknesses and priorities and audience and content and dah, dah, dah, dah, dah. But, that said, do you recommend any frequent protocols that often work well for many people, like, “First time, your goal is this. The second time, your goal is that. And the third time, your goal is this”?

Kerri Garbis
Why, in fact I do. The first time, concentrate on, “Does this have a structure?” It could be as simple as beginning, middle, and end, or problem, trial, solution, or some sort of narrative structure so that it is easy for the audience to follow.

So first time, you’re saying it out loud, concentrate on the structure of what you’re saying. And the second time, think about the delivery. So this is when you want to think about, “What is my body doing? What is my face doing? What is my voice doing?” This is the time to think about, “Am I saying lots of filler words? What am I doing that is distracting from my message?” and work on that, the delivery skill.

And then the third time is do it. Do it without stopping, no matter what happens. That’s a great time to break out the video camera, or, I guess, now today, we do a phone. If it’s the ‘90s, break out your big video camera, put it on your shoulder.

And then think of that as, we call it your dress rehearsal or on the stage portion of the rehearsal process, and do it without stopping, see what breaks so you can fix it.

Pete Mockaitis
You mentioned earlier we can’t control what other people feel, but we can increase the odds that they’ll feel the way we intend for them to. I’d love to hear your general principles for this.

I think, most often, the feeling I want people to have when I’m presenting is enthusiasm, motivation, vigor, like, “Heck, yeah, that makes a lot of sense. What a great idea! Let’s do it!” That’s kind of what I’m after most of the time. How do I get folks to feel that more often?

Kerri Garbis
Well, you can start by feeling excited, inspired, and behind that, or in addition to “What is the goal? What’s the, ‘Let’s do it part’?” You’ve got to get really specific about that, “So I want to excite my audience so that they…”

Pete Mockaitis
In this instance, it might be they rehearse their presentations more, so for this exchange, here and now, you and I.

Kerri Garbis
Yes, okay. In this moment, got it. We want to, as if we’ve painted that on the back wall, like I said, right, “Okay, my goal is I want people in this room to rehearse more, and I want to excite them.” That doesn’t mean I’m just going to stand up and be super excited about rehearsal, because that would probably get boring.

What if I scared them a little bit? What if I instilled some fear in them? What if I told them about a disaster story about a business leader who didn’t rehearse and the fallout from that and maybe that could get them a little excited to rehearse?

And I often find that you can, yes, we want to feel excited so our audience will feel excited. We can also get them there different ways. We can scare them, we can warn them, we could intrigue them. There’s a lot of different ways to get to the end result.

And all of that needs to start with how we’re feeling beyond being nervous. That is a huge thing that has to get conquered for public speaking. The National Institute of Mental Health states that 73% of the population suffers from public speaking anxiety.

Seventy three percent of the population suffers from public speaking anxiety, which means that most folks we’re seeing at a school meeting, at a business professional event, are nervous to speak.

And so a lot of what we do is also, in part, “How do we not only how do we be less nervous? How do we control that? And how do we get comfortable with feeling uncomfortable?”

It is so common for folks to be nervous when speaking. So how can both things get on stage together? How can my nerves and my excitement and all the other things I want to do come together and live harmoniously while I’m trying to impart this message?

Pete Mockaitis

Well said in terms of, if we want folks to have this emotional journey, we’re going to have to engage there emotionally. And that requires us getting unstuck with the, “Oh, I’m really freaked out about giving this presentation.”

So that is a great provocative question. Indeed, how do we get on stage with all of these pieces together, living up there? What are your favorite moves there?

Kerri Garbis
We like to start by asking, “What happens when you get nervous? Can you name it? Can you name the physical reaction,” right? When I get very nervous, you can physically see it. I get a splotchy neck. You can absolutely see it.

Some people are more external, some people are more internal, “I feel sick,” “I get tired,” “I start to get very hazy.” So, what does that look like for you. It could be multiple things like clammy.

I mean, I’ve heard all sorts of things, “I shake,” “I blink,” “I get dry mouth.” What does that look like for you? Let’s name it, and then maybe we can start to tame it, for lack of a better rhyme there.

And once we’re able to identify that, “Okay, what are the triggers? Is it actually stepping on the stage, whatever stage that is? Is it beforehand? Are we getting super nervous during rehearsal? Are we getting on stage, we’re fine the first minute and then we get freaked out?”

So we want to identify what it is and when it happens. That’s very, very individual. And start to work through that. And, of course, breathing, loads and loads of breathing techniques, breathing techniques beforehand, breathing techniques in the moment.

There’s all sorts of fixes. I don’t want to say fixes because we’re not getting rid of it. We’re making it palatable so that the person can be present when they’re standing on stage. So what are the techniques that we can use to make it palatable that the nervousness is with you on stage?

That could be a grounding item. That could be a visualization. There’s so many. There’s a myriad of things here.

Pete Mockaitis
And that’s encouraging. We got many tools in the toolkit to address this. So maybe just to zoom in specifically, let’s say I feel nervous in terms of my belly is, like, gurgling. Some might say butterflies in the stomach, but it feels more like there’s our there are waves sloshing around and they’re like, you know?

I know a guy who says, “I don’t eat before speaking for this reason.” Like, “All right, that’s, you know, commitment.” Hopefully he’s speaking in the morning. But so his stomach is like wave sloshing around kind of.

And then the trigger is internal in terms of, “I am imagining what if this goes poorly and there are bad consequences? I’m fired, lose status or respect or opportunity,” and that’s the blueprint of nerves here.

Kerri Garbis
We would start with the breath, connecting to the breath, relaxing the whole nervous system prior to. And then attempting to change your mindset from, “What if it goes badly?” to, “What if it goes well?” and instilling that visualization.

One of the most powerful things I was told as a kid, because, remember, I was a kid professional performer, and it was my middle school principal who told me this. I was really nervous before a middle school talent show.

And I remember being more nervous than I’d ever been in my entire life. And he said to me right before I went on, he said, “Imagine how you’re going to feel when it’s over instead of, ‘Oh, my gosh, I’m so nervous right now. I’m going to die. This is horrible.’”

It’s like, “Wait. Take a breath. Imagine how you’ll feel in three minutes when the song is over.” And I was like, “Oh.” And that really worked for me. That doesn’t work for everybody. That is really, still today, very powerful for me and something, one tool that we can impart.

So I would say, if this is what’s plaguing you, try different things. This is why rehearsal is important so that you can try on different things and see what works for you and managing your nerves. Is it breathing, meditation, visualization, a song? There are so many different things that will work for however you, your brain, your nervous system works.

Also note, one of the reasons I started this business was because, a long time ago, I went to help a friend get ready for a presentation, and I was waiting in the green room with the other speakers from his firm at the company, and there was a guy in the green room throwing up before his presentation.

Nobody in the room was concerned, except for me, and the other guys were like, “Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, this is what he does before every presentation. It was his thing. He threw up before every presentation.” And I thought, “There has to be a better way to go about this.”

And that was one of the very kind of first sparks of, “Maybe I could start a company that has employees, professional actors, to help business professionals not throw up in trash cans before presentations.”

Pete Mockaitis
“Nope, throwing up in the trash can, that’s just the best practice. It’s just scary, that’s just how we work it.”

Kerri Garbis
Yeah, and, in fact, it was our original tagline for the company. It didn’t really land well, but we’ve changed it.

Pete Mockaitis
And good for you for observing how the audience was receiving that messaging and then adjusting. It’s, like, you could be at it now 15 years later with the “throwing up in the trash can” line and you’d be poorly served by it. So, well said, there are many ways to address it.

We’ve had Matt Abrahams talk about some things like holding on to a cold object. Or, even broadly beyond speaking, Ethan Kross talking about how to shift emotions and chatter. So, yes, there are many, many ways.

But if I may put you on the spot and say, do you have a special way that you find is effective for a lot of people and not as many folks have heard of or tried before?

Kerri Garbis
Here’s one that, oftentimes, people will say, “Oh, I never thought about doing that.” So one way that nervousness can show up physically and also perpetuate throughout a presentation is movement, like swaying, like shifting. I’m shifting back and forth right now.

So one thing that we do recommend is that people put a coin in one of their shoes. And that way, they’re able to be, it’s a grounding technique, “I’m aware of both of my feet on the ground,” because they feel different, “I have a coin in one, I don’t have a coin in the other.”

And so at all moments, I know, or I can come back to, “Uh-oh, I’m shifting. Oh, I want to feel equally weighted on both feet,” so that they are very, very free to move around as needed, and then they can come back and say, “Oh, I’ve got both feet on the ground, I’m present, I’m in the moment, and I’m delivering.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, I like that a lot. Because something about being, I don’t know who I heard it, be where your feet are, or just that notion of awareness of the body, physical stuff. And the feet, in particular, really does seem to have some rooting ability.

I found that very helpful back in the day when I was interviewing and nervous, “Oh, I’m being evaluated by this interviewer, judging me.” I would just sort of, you know, put my attention on my feet and put both of them firmly on the floor, and I just felt grounded and solid, like, “I’m hard to tip over right now.” I don’t know, physiologically that was good for me.

So I’m right with you, that experiment and see what’s what’s working for you and that coin trick might be a good one. Well, Kerri, tell us, do you have any final thoughts before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Kerri Garbis
I’ll circle back to the beginning about rehearsal. And, oftentimes, people say, “I don’t have time to rehearse. I don’t know why I’m rehearsing,” and it doesn’t take very much time.

And if you are finding that you want to improve on presentation skills, and you are having a hard time getting motivated, it’s unpleasant for a lot of people. It’s uncomfortable and maybe a little bit scary.

Schedule something in which you have to present. So have some sort of culminating event out there in the future. Maybe it’s two weeks out and you’re going to go to…and make it low stakes, not something that’s going to colossally affect your career.

Sign up for a storytelling night, or you’re going to go present at something where the stakes are very low, so that you’ve got something that you’re going to prepare for and you’ve got a timeline and that you can try on some of these new skills and see how it feels.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool. All right. Well, now could you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Kerri Garbis
Well, it’s right behind me, which says, “Never teach a pig to sing because it wastes your time and annoys the pig.”

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Kerri Garbis
The marshmallow study.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, yeah. My kids do it for fun. I told them about this study and they’re like, “Ooh, this is a good treat. Let’s use it for a marshmallow test.” Like, just for fun, they do the marshmallow test.

Kerri Garbis
Yes, I find it fascinating. All things, before, when we were chit chatting before we were recording, we were really talking about human behavior and that exemplify, I love to observe human behavior.

I love to watch people when they get a little stressed if there’s a long line, if there’s some sort of discord happening. It is fascinating to me how humans respond under pressure, which is, essentially, what I’m doing with my job here.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Well, it’s fun. It’s an intriguing concept in so many ways. And, fun fact, Walter Michel’s book about the marshmallow experiment, he had the actor Alan Alda narrate the audio version. I was like, “How did you swing that? Good job. This is kind of entertaining to hear.” So shout out there.

Kerri Garbis
Because everything sounds better with Alan Alda. He is part of my childhood from the “Free to Be…You and Me” album.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, my gosh, I remember that. I didn’t make the connection. I remember, “It’s alright to cry.”

Kerri Garbis
“Crying gets the sad out of you. It’s all right.” Oh, please. “Parents are people, people with children.” Oh, my gosh. That? Yes. Yeah, okay.

Pete Mockaitis
I remember, I saw that at the Illinois Association of Junior High Student Councils Summer Camp, Leadership Camp, and because camp is already kind of emotional, you know, and then they throw that at you, it’s like, “Oh, it is okay to cry. Oh, I love you guys.” And a favorite book?

Kerri Garbis
My favorite book is Quit, Annie Duke. Do you know this one?

Pete Mockaitis
We’ve had Annie Duke, and we had talked about quitting with someone else, Lindsay Crouse, recently.

Kerri Garbis
So, Annie Duke, she’s a professional poker player. And it is about having your quit threshold. And it’s something I revisit often because I am a very, very loyal, almost to a fault, often to a fault, human.

If I like you, if I trust you, and I’m connected to you, I will hang on there for dear life. And this really helped me get perspective of, “What is my quit criteria?” And it’s not just for humans, it’s for practices within your business and in your life. And it’s been very powerful for me.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job.

Kerri Garbis
A favorite tool for me to be awesome at my job is a current tool that we’re using within the organization. It is something we built with a software partner, it’s called Bravo. And it is an AI rehearsal tool.

Pete Mockaitis
Oh, cool.

Kerri Garbis
So it is, you go on, guess what? You record yourself, you get feedback in terms of visual, vocal, and verbal presentation skills. And I use it to get ready for any of my speaking engagements. You absolutely keep a human in the loop, so you can send the recording to a coach or a colleague, and get human feedback.

And, to me, it’s a helpful AI tool, so I can rehearse at any time, get feedback, and also get human feedback and be better at what I do in terms of speaking. I used it for a pitch competition that I won yesterday.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Congratulations!

Kerri Garbis
Thanks.

Pete Mockaitis
And you helped make this thing?

Kerri Garbis
Yes, we have a software partner that we worked closely with to create the Bravo platform.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s so cool. I’m there immediately, as I do. And I’ve played with Speako back in the day. And then there’s ChatMatt but Matt Abrahams. So your AI is also looking at my vocal qualities as opposed to just my word choice?

Kerri Garbis
Correct. Yes.

Pete Mockaitis
Awesome.

Kerri Garbis
Do you sound enthusiastic? Do you sound nervous?

Pete Mockaitis
I’ve had a fun time sort of playing with some of these tools in which I have polite words but, like, a really mean tone. It’s, like, “I want to get a better understanding of how you’re thinking about this issue.”

And they’d say, “Great. Great job. You led with curiosity and openness.” I was like, “That was not a great job. I see that you’re only looking at my word choice tool.” So kudos for including that. And a favorite habit?

Kerri Garbis
My favorite habit is my exercise. I consider it part of my religion. If I do not exercise, I am not a very nice person. And it is that could be I get to the gym probably three times a week for weightlifting and then walking. Lots and lots and lots of walking and fresh air.

Pete Mockaitis
Cool. And is there a key nugget you share that tends to really connect and resonate with folks, they quote it back to you often?

Kerri Garbis
Here is my nugget I’m going to stand on till my dying day. You, speakers of the world, you don’t need to slow down. You need to use pause more.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that, yeah. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Kerri Garbis

Well, you can find me or my company, Ovation Communication, on all the platforms, meaning all of them, of LinkedIn, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube. We’ve got loads of fun and applicable content. And that is where you can find us, GetOvation.com.

The tagline which is now “Get prepared. Get confident. Get ovation” because we’ll make you not throw up in a trash can. Again, it didn’t land with the folks.

Pete Mockaitis
Lovely. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Kerri Garbis
You’re always going to have to present as a professional. And even if you have three minutes before you have to present, if you can simply say that first line and your closing line once out loud before you walk in the room, you’re already going to be exponentially better than if you only said it in your head.

Pete Mockaitis
Awesome. That sounds quick and easy.

Kerri Garbis
Rehearsal doesn’t have to be like this long-term relationship. It can be three minutes. It’s okay. It’s all good.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Kerri, thank you.

Kerri Garbis
You’re welcome. Thank you for the delightful conversation.

1187: Knowing When to Speak Up versus Shut Up with Vanessa Bohns

By Podcasts No Comments

Vanessa Bohns shares a science-backed guide to deciding when speaking up is helpful and when silence is the better choice.

You’ll Learn

  1. How to be honest without being harsh
  2. The hidden trade-off between vulnerability and competence
  3. When it DOES hurt to ask

About Vanessa

Vanessa Bohns is a social psychologist and professor of organizational behavior at Cornell University. She holds a PhD in psychology from Columbia University and an AB from Brown University. Her writing has appeared in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Harvard Business Review, and other outlets, and her research has been featured in The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, The Economist, and on NPR’s Hidden Brain. She lives in upstate New York.

Resources Mentioned

Pete Mockaitis
Vanessa, welcome back!

Vanessa Bohns
Thanks so much for having me again.

Pete Mockaitis

Well, I’m excited to learn, once and for all, whether or not I should say something and discuss your book. But I got to hear about your time working at a sleep lab first.

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, you know, my introduction to research and the thing that made me fall in love with it was working at a sleep lab at Brown University when I was an undergrad. And it was just a crazy experience where we ran this sleep camp for kids between the ages of eight and 12. We were trying to capture them right around puberty.

And they had to live in the basement lab for a week in the dark. And we gave them little naps throughout the day to see how sleepy they got, and they had to take these little sleep tests and they had to eat the same little bologna sandwiches at the same times all the time because they couldn’t know what time of day it was outside.

We couldn’t have watches. It was this crazy experiment. It was actually very useful for the world. It showed us that kids through puberty have to get more sleep. They have to go to bed later, wake up later. So there was a purpose behind the madness, but it was a wild experience and it just showed me how elaborate a psychology study can be.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, Vanessa, I love that so much for several reasons. One, I love sleep and I have been into a sleep lab myself at Vanderbilt, and that was quite an experience, all the wires and the monitoring things going on there.

Vanessa Bohns

What did they test you for?

Pete Mockaitis
Well, it was sleep apnea, very ordinary. And what’s so crazy is, like, they told me, “Oh, yeah, it looks like you have mild sleep apnea.” And I was like, “No way.” Like, I didn’t believe it. I was like, “Can you show me some footage?”

And then I just, like, got a phone recorder the next night, it was like, “Oh, yeah, there I am doing the thing.” I was like, “I guess I could have just done that instead of gone to an elaborate laboratory situation to learn this.”

Vanessa Bohns
Actually, I worked in one of those labs after at the NYU lab, and I would watch people sleep all night and then put the apnea mask on them to see if it actually made their sleep better. It was fun. Anyway, I loved the sleep stuff, but you know why I can’t do it? It’s because you have to stay up all night, and I love sleep too much, I cannot do sleep research.

Pete Mockaitis

Understood. And that’s a great reason. You love it too much to do it, the sleep versus the study of it. And one thing that I thought was so striking, though, was I asked someone, the lab technician, as she was getting me all hooked up to the things, I was like, “Boy, I bet you’ve met a lot of people and heard a lot of tips and tricks for, you know, how people are are trying to sleep better. So what’s the thing?”

I guess I can’t stop being an interviewer about being awesome at your job, being awesome at your sleeping. And she’s like, “Oh, I heard all kinds of things but the real thing that does the trick no one wants to hear, which is put your phone in another room.” I was like, “Oh, okay. There you have it.”

Vanessa Bohns

Yeah, it’s a good one.

Pete Mockaitis

Cool beans. Well, so, Should I Say Something? I’m glad she said something. She’s sort of shared her perspective. Your latest book, The Science of What to Share and What to Keep to Yourself. Can you tell us what’s the big idea here?

Vanessa Bohns

Yeah, so, partly, this is a follow-up of my first book, which is all about the influence we have on other people. And I kind of left that book saying, you know, we have more influence than we think on other people, and that means sometimes we should use it and sometimes we shouldn’t, because that influence could be good or bad.

And so this book is kind of answering the question, “Okay, you know, you told us to use it sometimes, but when are those times?” And so the big idea here is that the choice of whether to say something is as important, if not more important, than how we actually say the thing.

Usually, the dilemma we’re wrestling with, and I saw this again and again because I’m obsessed with advice columns, and I would read like The Ethicist in The New York Times and social cues, and it was like every question, it’s not like, “Oh, how do I phrase this thing?” because that’s not a true dilemma. It’s more of a practical instrumental thing.

But, like, the dilemma is, “Do I tell this person that, you know, I got the job that she wanted.” “Do I tell this person that they’re doing something annoying?” “Do I tell this person that, you know, I hate their Botox?” And so these kinds of questions were the real dilemmas. And so I wanted to look at what the science said in trying to answer them.

Pete Mockaitis
Ooh, that is so fantastic. And I’m glad you wrote this book because I was thinking about writing a book kind of like it, but I thought this was going to be a lot of work and, I don’t know. I’ve got other things I want to do. So you did it for me and that’s fantastic.

And because I’m right with you, that is so critical, and not just because it’s a juicy question for The New York Times’ Ethicist, but it has real implications. And on the one hand, you know, we’ve heard, you know, for Amy Edmondson was on the podcast, and we talked about psychological safety, and that’s just so magical, in part because folks are really able to, they feel safe, saying what they really think.

Like, “Hey, this thing we’re doing kind of doesn’t seem to be working. Maybe we should do something else,” versus just, like, holding that to themselves and then the team never being enriched from that.

So one might infer from that, like, “Oh, it sounds like that’s the move, you know? To be awesome at your job, to have awesome teams, we really got to be doing the sharing.” But, Vanessa, you suggest it’s not quite so simple.

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, and I love this connection to the work on psychological safety because it’s true. You would think, in a psychologically safe environment, that means I can say anything and people are, you know, it’s not going to change how people think of me, and it’s not going to change their feelings.

But we know that’s not true because, even in a psychologically safe environment, people are people, right? And so one example, so I organized the book in chapters about, like, “Should I be honest? Should I share my success? Should I share my failure? Should I apologize?”

And so one of the chapters, the one about sharing failures and vulnerabilities, right, you might think that, “Oh, it’s psychologically safe. I can just kind of share the stuff that’s going on in my life. Like, I’m having a really hard time in this aspect of my personal life, and then everybody is just going to be open and supportive.”

And what the research shows is that people are supportive. And so if you’re looking for, you know, social support and building rapport and trust, you will get that if you share this difficulty that you’re having in your personal life.

But, again, because people are people and we build our impressions about other people, you know, aside from any psychological safety in a group, we also can judge that person as being less competent. And so when you share something, there are often these trade-offs.

In that one, it’s like you share a vulnerability at work and there’s a trade-off. It doesn’t mean that people are going to like you less, which we often really focus on, but in a workplace environment where you really want to display competence and be seen as someone who can get things done, it can actually hurt you a little bit in terms of the perceptions of your competence.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. So, Vanessa, I’m with you. I mean, the stakes are big. Well, they can be, depending on the context of the conversation. So can you walk us through how should we think about it when we’re in that pickle, “Hmm, should I say this?” Do we have some key principles to work through? Or how do we wrestle with it?

Vanessa Bohns

Yeah, so each sort of dilemma has its own set of specific principles, but there are also some just overarching principles that we see kind of in most of these domains. And so one is that we tend to be overly focused on the short-term discomfort of saying something and less on the long-term ramifications of it or consequences of it.

And so one principle that shows up again and again is to take a long-term view, right, “If you say this right now, what are people going to think when they remember what you said, you know, six months from now?”

And sometimes that means you should definitely say it. So when we take a long-term view about, for example, being honest with someone about their work performance. Right now, in the moment, I’m really focused on sort of the short-term discomfort of being honest and how it’s probably going to hurt this person’s feelings if I’m giving them honest, difficult feedback.

But in the long term, I really want them to have that feedback. It’s going to help them improve. They’re going to look back and be happy that they received it and happy that I gave it.

And so when you take a long-term view, you realize that this momentary discomfort isn’t really worth the long-term consequences, so I’m not going to stay silent. I’m going to actually say something.

There are other situations where you might not want to say something, right? And so if we take the same sort of feedback question, if someone has done something that they’re not going to have a chance to do in the future, and it’s already done and they can’t go back and fix it, there is no point in being honest and telling them they did something wrong.

So there’s this distinction researchers make between brutal honesty, just honesty for honesty’s sake, like, “Oh, that really stunk,” and benevolent honesty, so honesty with this kind of long-term plan.

And so one sort of principle that applies specifically in the feedback domain, but also you can apply it to other domains, is ask yourself, “If I say something, if I say this thing, if I give them this feedback, how are they going to use it?”

And if you can’t come up with a reason why they might use that feedback, then you really don’t need to say it. There’s no point in saying it. If you, instead say, “Oh, well, they can use it to improve in the future,” then it’s worth saying.

And so this is something I talk about. You know, I teach this big intro class and I give hundreds of students their first exam, usually their first college exam ever. And I have to make this decision each year about what kind of exam to give them. And there’s a lot of different ways you can go, right?

And people have taken each of these approaches. So you can imagine a professor who decides like, “I’m going to give a really easy exam to boost their confidence. They’re new students, they’re anxious, we’re always hearing about like the mental health crisis of students, so let’s just give them a really easy exam and it’ll boost their confidence.”

Or, you could take the approach, which some of my colleagues take as well as, “Let’s give them a super difficult exam to wake them up and weed out anyone who’s not going to sort of make it, right?”

And so these are, like, two approaches that are completely approaches I’ve seen my colleagues take. What I try to do is neither of these. One is like brutal honesty, like, “Oh, you can’t make it using your current sort of set of skills.”

The other one is just kind of avoidance of the issue and false hope. So it’s like, “Okay, you know, eventually they feel good now, eventually they’re going to encounter something that’s a lot harder.”

So I try to use this benevolent honesty strategy where I give them a challenging exam, I give them real feedback, and then we focus everything on how you’re going to improve on the next exam.

And so, again, it’s all this forward thinking, like, “I assume you’re going to get better. We’re going to have a difficult conversation about what went wrong here. I’m not going to give you false hope by giving you an easy exam. I’m not going to be brutal and say, ‘I guess you can’t, you know, make it in this.’ But we’re going to have a difficult exam, we’re going to have the conversation, and we’re going to talk about how to do better next time.”

And so, in general, that sort of approach of, like, let’s look to this forward long-term oriented way of giving feedback is really useful, both for deciding whether to give feedback and how to give the feedback.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s really a nice distinction there, the benevolent honesty versus brutal honesty. If you cannot answer that question, “How will they use this or behave differently as a result of it?” then don’t do it. So if it’s like one and done, never again, okay, maybe you might be like just let them go.

Although, you might say, “Hey, we’re not going to handle this exact situation again, but there will probably be a time in which a client has a unique request. And when they do, it’d be great to, I don’t know, read their email twice, or double-check the thing, or anticipate what they might really need, or ask a clarifying question, like whatever it is.”

So, I suppose, if you zoom out one layer of, “Are they going to do this again?” I guess the ‘this’ can be super specific or broadly more and more vague or generalizable.

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, and what you’re doing is really looking for this future-oriented feedback, right? So it’s not like, “Oh, you know, you shouldn’t have done that, you shouldn’t have sent Karen that email.”

It’s like, “In the future, when we have clients like this, we want to make sure that we run an email by somebody else. We send this kind of email. We read the email twice, whatever it might be. So it’s less about like what you did in this specific situation, and more like how we’re going to avoid that problem happening in the future.”

And the nice thing about that is it’s easier to give that feedback. It’s really hard, like when you think about, like, telling someone what they did wrong, you brace for it in your stomach. It’s just like, “Ugh, this is going to be painful for me. They’re going to get defensive. It’s just me telling, like saying something that’s going to make them feel bad.”

And part of why giving feedback is so hard, like honest feedback, is that we are genuinely kind and we want to be kind people. And we feel like that kind of feedback is not kind. But the kind of feedback that is kind is what helps people improve.

And so saying instead, “Okay, in the future, let’s do it this way.” It says, “I trust you to improve. I know that you can improve and you care about this, and we’re kind of on the same team to improve in the future.” And it makes it so much easier to give that feedback.

It’s like a helpful kind of, you feel like you’re being kind of pro-social and benevolent as opposed to just being kind of mean, which is part of the holdup people have. But also, people are way less defensive. They’re not going to argue with you, “Well, I meant to do it this way.” It’s like, “Okay, going forward, we can do it that way.”

Pete Mockaitis
And, Vanessa, I just want to check an assumption, I think, we’re both making here, this notion of we, “We want to be kind and not mean.” I think that seems like a general human principle. But I also get the impression there’s a subset of folks who are unconcerned entirely with that.

And so it’s like, “This is how it’s supposed to be done, so I’m just going to say it and that’s that.” It’s like they don’t give it a second thought. Do you have a sense from the research, like, what’s the term we use for these people with this, on this continuum of this trait? Like, what do we call the trait? And how many people have it versus don’t?

Vanessa Bohns
I mean, I would say, you know, there are people who are more communal-oriented or agreeable, things like that.

Pete Mockaitis
Agreeable.

Vanessa Bohns

But I wouldn’t say that the feedback example that you gave, “This is just how it’s supposed to be done,” is necessarily not benevolently honest, right? It’s still like, “This is how it should be done.” There’s this kind of broader future-oriented, you know, “I’m teaching you. So maybe I’m not doing it in a super touchy-feely way.”

And I think that’s where people get a little bit caught up. Like, it doesn’t have to be touchy-feely. There has to be a plan for the future, not just, “You did that terribly,” right?

Pete Mockaitis

Oh, certainly.

Vanessa Bohns
So there are people, I’m sure, who would say like, “Oh, you did that terribly. You’re terrible at your job.” That’s, I think, a very small subset of people. And it’s more for the people who don’t feel comfortable saying that, but don’t really know how to do this other, like, benevolent, honesty, future-oriented kind of feedback.

Pete Mockaitis
I hear you. So it can be benevolently honest and genuinely helpful, although, in a super blunt, maybe a candid package, that’s not fun to get. But I guess what I’m hearing from you is that, is it fair to say, the vast majority of humans are concerned about such things, being kind and not mean?

Vanessa Bohns
Yes. And even that awkwardness we feel when we give, you know, difficult feedback, that is telling you that you care about hurting someone else’s feelings. There’s nothing else in that interaction that’s like really the hard part.

The hard part is when you say something that other person is going to be uncomfortable, that’s not going to feel good, that other person’s going to be a little bit hurt, you don’t know how they’re going to react. There’s this idea, it’s really bracing yourself for hurting this other person that makes that so uncomfortable for us.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So it’s not just us feelers who feel that substantial amount of discomfort here. This is, you believe, quite prevalent across the vast majority of humanity.

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, people hate giving negative feedback. I mean, there’s tons of research just on these, you know, whether it’s doctors even who give regular feedback, who have to tell people about, you know, dire diagnoses, professors. Like, I’m sitting here talking about this. I hate giving negative feedback to students. It pains me.

But this is why, the way that I’ve sort of found to do it is this future-oriented way where I’m like, “Okay, together we’re working to help you improve, right? I’m not just here criticizing you, essentially.” So I do think it’s a pretty universal difficulty that people have giving negative feedback, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So we’re talking about the feedback domain. What’s another key domain we should think through?

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, so another one, if we go back to sort of the sharing vulnerability at work, right? As I pointed out in this case, there’s kind of another theme. So you asked about like kind of these general themes in the book. So one is this long-term, short-term thinking, right, and being future-oriented.

Another one is trade-offs. And the fact that in different situations, you should be super aware of what your goal is in that situation to understand how to manage a trade-off. And so in the vulnerability domain, like expressing to a colleague about some personal stuff that’s been going on with you at home, the trade-off, as we talked about, is between competence and warmth, we would say, in experimental psychology.

So it would be like, “People are going to like me and feel close to me if I open up and trust them.” And so a lot of our fears are about like, “Oh, if I tell people, you know, the things I don’t like about myself or things that I’m finding difficult, they won’t like me.” And it turns out that is really not true.

People feel, like, when you trust them with what’s going on with you, they really lean in towards you. But as I mentioned, there is this trade-off with competence. You can seem less competent, less able to handle certain things.

And so in that case, you want to, first of all, ask what your goal is, “Which of these things do I prioritize? Being seen as competent in this situation or being liked?” And if you’re, like, in this workplace environment, “I really want to make sure I’m still seen as competent.” But if you still see your kind of work friends as your friends, and you, therefore, want to share these things with them, there are ways to do that that just aren’t in the workplace.

And so one sort of recommendation I give in the book is that, when you’re trying to balance these things, you don’t want to, if you’re trying to prioritize competence, don’t tell people in the hallway or at the beginning of meetings all the stuff that’s been going on with you at home.

Unless you are have a specific instrumental ask that, “I need some support,” or, “I need some time off,” that’s fine. But if you’re just kind of sharing sort of difficulties that you’re having, keep it to happy hour after work. Keep it to a coffee meeting outside of work.

And that can give you a chance to actually connect with people, talk to them, make them feel closer to you, which we see is a benefit of sharing vulnerabilities. But, at the same time, it’s not, like, “In the workplace, I’m talking about these things and now people are questioning my professionalism.”

“They’re questioning my competence. They know what’s going on outside of work, but then, in the workplace, I’m kind of putting in my workplace face and getting the job done. And so people continue to sort of see me that way in that domain.”

Pete Mockaitis
And then, I guess, when it comes to vulnerability and versus that competence situation, I imagine there’s a number of things we could disclose that feel personal but would not result in a competence hit. It was like, “Oh, you know, I’m really worried about, I don’t know, my son’s drug problem.” I’m just making this up. My kids are drug free.

But, like, that’s a vulnerable thing to share. It’s heavy. It’s emotional. It’s not something that you broadcast, generally. And yet, I would imagine that the recipients at work would not conclude you’re less competent as a result of this disclosure. Or, how would you think about that?

Vanessa Bohns
So they didn’t ask that exact kind of thing, but, I guess, when you look at the kinds of things that researchers have tested people disclosing, so, for example, saying like, “Oh, I had a big fight with my girlfriend today,” right, that’s kind of similar. It doesn’t have to do with the workplace. It’s something that’s kind of on your mind and is this vulnerable thing you’re wrestling with.

People, again, they felt closer to people who are willing to share that. But if they were the ones sharing it, they also got this hit in incompetence. They don’t have a mechanism in these studies, so it could be a number of things.

It could be that you think this person is distracted, or, you know, they’re not like focused on work, or they don’t know professional norms about what to talk about. These are all conjecture. I have no idea based on the research. They didn’t actually show any of that.

But there is sort of this sense of like, “Okay, you know, my sort of friendliness-trust button is being pushed and not my like, ‘Oh, this is a competent worker,’” when you’re disclosing these kinds of personal things.

One interesting thing is that, if you find out that somebody is going through some of these personal things, but they don’t specifically disclose it, so it’s like, “Oh, wow, this person is being professional and pressing on and, you know, doing their work despite all this other stuff they have going on.”

And that’s where you can find out, like, again, in a coffee shop outside of work or through word of mouth, suddenly, that makes us think, “Oh, wow, that’s a really competent person,” right?

And so, again, the idea is not to deny yourself asking for help for things that you actually need help for. When there’s an instrumental need, when it’s like, “I need support,” you should ask for that.

When you need advice, you can, ideally, you can go to, like, a mentor who is there to hear things that you need advice on. And that could be like work-life challenges and things like that.

But it’s one of these things that’s kind of tricky if you’re walking around your workplace regularly kind of talking about personal difficulties going on at home. It’s just worth knowing that there could be some risk that that could make you seem kind of less competent.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, it’s true and it’s good to know and to make an informed decision with regard to giving these trade-offs. And, sometimes, you might gather, “You know what? This team seems to think I’ve got competence in spades, but they think I’m kind of cold. So this is a trade well worth making in this context with this environment.”

Well, I’d also love to hear, what were some of the most mind-blowing experiments in terms of, “Wow, humans are like this? Hmm. I’m surprised.”

Vanessa Bohns
I think one kind of fun one, just because I love animals, I wouldn’t call it mind-blowing, but, is this study on zookeepers. And this was with respect to whether you should express your passion for your work.

And this study looked at zookeepers who see their job, really, as not just a job but a calling, which, you know, when you think about it, so many of us want to feel about our job. We want to love our job. We want to have passion for our job. And zookeepers feel this way.

And so they interviewed, these researchers interviewed a number of zookeepers, and they expressed their love for their job. But one thing that was really interesting is that they explicitly said that they would not tell their managers the kinds of things they were telling these researchers.

So expressing that they love their job, they’re passionate, because they felt like, if their managers knew how passionate they were about their job, they might exploit them, ask them to work extra hours, ask them for things that they felt like were unreasonable.

And one thing that’s really interesting about this is, when experimentalists have kind of taken this idea and tested it, we tend to think, if you just give people jobs that people tend to be passionate about, or jobs that tend to not have a lot of passion, or not be associated with passion.

Like, you take a zookeeper versus like an accountant, or, you know, someone in a creative industry versus like a financial industry, and you ask them like, “Would it be okay to ask this person to do things outside of their role, ask them to stay late, ask them to do things without pay, basically do these kind of, you know, borderline exploitative behaviors?”

People think it’s okay if you’re passionate about your job to ask people to stay late. But they’re like, “Oh, the accountant, the financial person, that’s not fair to ask them to stay late.”

They even have things like, you know, there was a strike, “Is it fair to ask these people to clean the bathroom?” And they’re like, “Okay, yeah, this person in a creative industry who’s passionate about their job, they can clean the bathroom. But this financial person, no, that wouldn’t be right to ask them to clean the bathroom.”

And so, once again, there’s this kind of trade-off in being passionate about your job where it’s really great to be passionate about your job, but it may not be so great to express it to people who might exploit it, for example, to managers.

And so I’ve just found that really, really interesting that these people who love their job were still kind of cagey at work about telling the people who are in charge that they did.

Pete Mockaitis

Yes, and I imagine it comes from experience. Like, they’ve lived it, they’ve seen it, they’ve witnessed it, and that is a nice little gut-check for anyone who’s asking anyone to do anything. It’s like, you know, “Would you ask this of someone who had less passion for the job?” That’s handy.

And so then, within your zone of, “Should I say something?” It seems that I feel that trade-off yet again. I’ve known someone who was interviewing and he really wanted the job, and then the person interviewing did not give him the offer, and said, “Well, you just didn’t seem that interested.”

And he’s like, “I’m very interested. It’s, like, that’s just my personality.” It’s like, “Ahh.” And so it’s funny, like when you’re interviewing for a job, it seems like you want to show all kinds of enthusiasm and passion for it.

And yet, when you’re in the thick of it, you know, your manager may or may not exploit that knowledge. And, yeah, I guess it’s kind of case by case. Or do you have any pro tips for navigating it?

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, so that’s exactly right. You kind of picked out the different points at which you should say that you love your job or shouldn’t say that you love your job, right? And so, for example, lots of job ads these days are like, “We want a passionate worker.”

So Jon Jachimowicz, who does a lot of this work on passion, has looked at job ads and shown this increase, right? So we do want to hire people who seem interested and passionate, particularly for certain kinds of jobs.

Like, again, if we go to like accountants, like we don’t care that much if our accountants are really passionate. But in some kinds of jobs, we’re really looking for someone who’s going to bring this passion and extra energy.

And so when you are interviewing, before you have the job, you do want to express your passion. Once you actually have the job, continuing to walk around being like, “I love my job,” you know, if you’re okay with getting extra work, that might be fine. But there should be this sort of awareness, once again, that there is this trade-off.

So people, there’s been recent research by one of my students, actually, and some other researchers, showing that bosses tend to give more work to employees they see as passionate and employees they see as intrinsically motivated.

And so, again, if that’s fine with you, you can express your intrinsic motivation and your passion. But it is one of those things to be aware of that also could set you up to, potentially, be exploited, to be the person who’s asked constantly to stay late, to do the extra work, etc.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, and then, I guess, there’s yet another layer in terms of, “And if you do those things,” is there some meritocratic force that’s going to result in, you know, good things flowing to you? It’s like, “Oh, wow, that person, they’re on it. I count on them. Of course, they’re going to get the promotion or the raise or the bonus or whatever,” versus, “There are none of those available for anybody, so we just appreciate them. Thanks.”

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, and some of this research has specifically looked at, like, promotable and non-promotable tasks. So this is a distinction that’s been done in research looking at, like, the kinds of tasks certain groups of people, like women versus men, wind up taking on, and also people who express passion in, like, intrinsic motivation for the job.

And this research has shown that, specifically, it becomes a problem because these people wind up getting these jobs that don’t actually lead to promotions later on. They’re just, like, extra work.

It’s just, “Yes, I can count on that person to do it,” but it’s just like kind of the busy work that needs to get done, right? It’s the like pitch in and, you know, again like stay late, clean the bathroom in that one study, do things that are really outside of your role that may not actually help you down the line.

Yeah, and some other. I mean, this is really related to another section of the book, which is on asking and whether we should ask for things. Because one of the things I talk about is the fact that an ask really is inherently full of social pressure, particularly in the workplace.

And so, when we ask people to do things outside of their role, to stay late, to do something even, you know, borderline inappropriate, whatever it might be, it’s really hard for people to say no.

And so I have done research on that for about 20 years. My most recent research has really tried to push it to the extreme in the lab. And so you asked about, like, studies that make me say, “Wow, I can’t believe people are like that.”

I have to talk about one of my own because I’ve honestly been shocked that this has been happening in our lab. We have these studies where we ask participants to unlock their phones and hand it over to us to look through.

And when we tell people, “We’re going to run a study like this,” most people, like 75%, say, “I would never unlock my phone and just let you look through it.” But when we actually ask people, they immediately unlock it, hand it over, like over 80% of the time.

And so we think that, you know, if we’re asked to do something we’re uncomfortable with or we’re asked to do something we don’t want to do, we’ll just say no. But when we’re actually put in that immediate situation, we wind up complying.

And we even have people, so we had a study where we said, “We’re going to look through your web search history,” because no one really wants to share their web search history. And they would like blurt out random things they had shared rather than just say, “No, thank you. I don’t want to do that.”

And so this idea that, you know, the things we ask also, sometimes that means, “Go ahead and ask. There’s no harm. And people are more likely to say yes than you think,” sometimes it means like, “Think twice. Maybe don’t ask for that if that person is already overcommitted, and you know that by asking, they’re going to feel pressure to agree.”

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yes, and then they may agree and they may do it and then they resent you and the relationship is damaged even though, like, ideally, they would have said no. So when you said they blurted out, what were they blurting?

Vanessa Bohns
So we had, you know, just random things that they had searched because they thought we were going to look through their web search history. So it’d be like, “I just searched how tall Peppa Pig is. I can tell you why if you want to know.” Or just like these random things.

Pete Mockaitis
“I had a wart on my foot, and it’s almost gone now.”

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, I’m only sticking to the ones that are like less personal. But, yeah, those, too.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, good point. Thank you. Well, Vanessa, tell me, is there anything else you really want to make sure to put out there before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Vanessa Bohns
Well, I’ll just kind of finish this whole “When to ask? When not?” with a couple suggestions that I’ve been really excited about that we’ve been working on in our lab for how to get people to say yes but still feel like they are, you know, not resent you after the fact, feel like they actually genuinely committed.

And so one thing we’ve been testing is, if you give someone advanced notice, so, you know, you can try this when you’re asking for something at work, we often will just either email someone with an ask or show up and ask them in the moment.

The best thing is to combine those two things to tell them, “Okay, I want to come ask you this question, and actually ask them, but I want to ask you face-to-face because that’s the most effective way to ask.”

And we found that by giving someone a heads up, so that you walk into their office, you make the request, but they already know what you’re asking, it makes them feel like they had time to process, so they’re not like put on the spot.

And we found that it doesn’t actually change how much, like how likely they are to say yes very much, but it does make them feel like, “Okay, I know what I was getting into. I don’t feel like you kind of forced me into this. I didn’t feel obligated or compelled.” So I would recommend people trying out these different ways of asking for true consent and not just compliance.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, any final really cool stories that have come about in putting this together?

Vanessa Bohns
Okay, one thing I do talk about in the book is my own experience being ghosted on the academic job market. And this idea that, you know, when I was on the job market, I wound up having these interviews, and academic jobs are intense interviews where you have meals with tons of people and you spend tons of hours with people, and you really feel like you get to know these people.

And when I got rejected for this job that I was kind of holding out for, no one told me that I got rejected. I had to, like months later, I had to be like, “Is that job still happening?” Like, “Oh, no, we just wound up not hiring anybody.”

And so one of the things I talk about is this idea that we often let our anxiety about being honest about these things, particularly rejection and difficult feedback, convince us that the kind thing to do is not to reach out and tell someone, “Oh, you’ve been rejected.” But, in fact, it’s so much worse for the person on the receiving end.

And so one sort of point I make there is how important it is to actually explicitly reach out and tell people like, “I’m sorry. The position has been filled or we’re not hiring, etc.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, and I think that really exposes the truth of our sort of, I don’t know, pusillanimous interior avoidant self is that, “Is this really about kindness or is this really about your discomfort?” because just ghosting is clearly not kind, but it’s sure more comfortable for an individual in terms of, like, not saying the thing is more comfortable than saying the thing. Yet, ghosting is clearly less kind than saying the thing.

Vanessa Bohns
But, you know, the research shows that we know that when we’re on the receiving end and we clearly say, “That felt way less kind than actually just having someone tell me I was rejected.”

But the rejecters/ghosters don’t realize that it’s actually more kind. And, as you point out, I completely think it’s possible that we convince ourselves because it’s easier for us. And so I think one big takeaway is that, as we’re figuring out like, “What’s my goal here? What’s my motivation?” that we’re honest with ourselves.

Because, I think, if we were to put ourselves in the other, on the sort of the receiving end, we would realize that actually, “No, that’s really unkind to just have no communication.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, it takes one extra layer of thoughtful consideration. It’s like, “Oh, that’d be so mean to say you’re rejected.” It’s like, “Yes, but how mean would it be to say nothing?” It’s like, “Oh, yeah, I guess that would be even meaner. Okay.” So, yeah.

Vanessa Bohns
And I’ll tell you even more sort of realistic scenario. For example, when we have candidates come and interview, they interview with, you know, my entire department. And as department chair, if I’m telling someone they didn’t get the job, I’m the one who reaches out and says, like, “I’m really sorry, but we went with someone else.”

And I think there is a sense that if everybody else that person met with also sent them, like, a version of a rejection email, that that might not be kind. But I actually think that people would appreciate having someone reach out and say, “You know, I’m really sorry it didn’t work out, but it was a pleasure to meet you,” as opposed to like, “Oh, then I never heard from those other people I actually spent a lot of time with again.”

I think that’s a clearer place where you can imagine really not being sure, like, “Should we all, essentially, reach out and reject this person?” But you can do it in a way that is actually kind and says like, “Oh, no, I acknowledge that I met you. I’m sorry it didn’t work out. Like, good luck.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, agreed. Cool. Well, now can we hear about a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, so I will say this is not a quote I find inspiring, but it’s a quote I find enraging, which is kind of a type of inspiring. So there’s this Wayne Gretzky quote that you miss a hundred percent of the goals you don’t, or shots you don’t take. Yeah, I see it all the time.

People always have it in their like email signatures and it drives me crazy because, specifically, because the whole point of my research and this book is like it’s not about just always taking the shot, right?

There are times you shouldn’t be asking for things. There are times you want to think twice. And so that quote, particularly, always just rubs me the wrong way when I see it.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Vanessa Bohns
I’ll tell you one of my favorite studies from this book, is this one where the researchers had their research assistants put, like, a glob of chocolate on their face or a glob of lipstick. And they went up to people and they, you know, asked them to complete a survey and pretended they didn’t know they had something on their face.

And they wanted to see what the personality traits were of the people who said something and the people who didn’t say something. And, in the end, what they found was that they couldn’t even analyze the data because only, like, four people out of over a hundred said anything.

And so, for me, that study is it’s such a fun study, but also the fact that, like, the effect was so much stronger than even they imagined of, like, us not wanting to give feedback, that they couldn’t even use half their data.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. And a favorite book?

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, so I’m really obsessed with this kind of weird but amazing book called Why Fish Don’t Exist. It’s nonfiction. I love nonfiction. And it kind of transcends genres. It’s like a memoir of the author, but it’s also about the taxonomist who came up with, like, the taxonomy that we currently have to figure out, you know, where animals fit in their, like, genre and species, etc. And it’s just a fascinating read and fun.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job.

Vanessa Bohns
I mean, it’s just always, always going to be a pen because, I think, and I tell my students this, I tell my executive students, I tell my undergrad students, because it’s just true, based on the research,

Writing things down by hand helps you process more, helps you remember more. It’s just so much better for deep thinking. Like, typing is efficient, but if you actually want to process and think, like, pen is your best friend.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite habit?

Vanessa Bohns
Going for walks, that just clears my head and it helps me think.

Pete Mockaitis
And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, they quote it back to you often?

Vanessa Bohns

I would say it’s always my research on asking in person. I get so many emails from people and, I mean, really, I respect that they read the research and they come up with, like, a cute intro, but I don’t know if they realize how many emails I get like this that says, “I know, based on your research, I really should be coming and asking you in person.” I’d say like 50% of the emails I get start with that. And so, yeah, that seems to have made a mark.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Vanessa Bohns
Almost everything you need to get in touch is on my website, VanessaBohns.com, but I’m also on LinkedIn, I’m on Instagram, most of the social media sites @profbohns.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Vanessa Bohns
Ask for things more, but when you do it, practice asking in ways that actually give the other person autonomy to say no. And I think the asking is a good thing, but I think also the giving the autonomy. So give a try, you know, give people, come up with a request, give people a heads-up that it’s coming, and just experiment, see if it works.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a favorite way that you, or script or preamble or move you like to do for that autonomy-granting accompaniment?

Vanessa Bohns

Yeah, so, I mean, there’s giving people time. There’s giving people a heads-up. Another one is you ask people in person, and then you say, “Don’t give me an answer right now. Let me know tomorrow. Let me know next week,” right? Again, so you give them time to actually think about something so you get their buy-in.

Another thing we’ve tried is giving people the words to say no. So one thing we found in our work is that it’s really hard for people to find the words to say no, and sometimes we’ll just say yes because we can’t think of a good excuse.

So when you ask for something, you actually give them sort of the script or like the thing you would accept in their no. And so I do this when, for example, I have graduate students and I want to ask them to start a new project.

So my goal with graduate students, I want them, you know, I may think that this is a really good project for them to start, but I do not want them to take on more than they can actually handle. And I want them to be honest if they don’t have time to do something or they’re not interested enough to do a good job at it.

And so we’ll have a meeting and I’ll say, “I have this idea for a project. I want you to think about it and decide whether you want to be part of it. I would love you to run it. So I’m very clear I’m actually asking you to do this if you’re interested. But I don’t want you to tell me right now. I want you to look at your schedule. I want you to think about it. Get back to me the next time we meet.”

And I’ll also give them an excuse, you know, “And if you can’t do it, just tell me, ‘I just have too much on my schedule,’ because it’s, like, I will accept that response.’” And so I try to model that my own requests.

Pete Mockaitis

Beautiful. All right. Vanessa, thank you.

Vanessa Bohns
Yeah, thank you. It’s been a pleasure.

1186: The Hidden Cost of Undersharing with Leslie John

By Podcasts No Comments

Leslie John makes the compelling case for why we need to open up more in work and in life.

You’ll Learn

  1. The surprising upsides to oversharing
  2. The easiest and loveliest thing to overshare
  3. Why it’s a good sign when people cringe

About Leslie

Leslie John is the James E. Burke Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. Her award-winning research appears in top academic journals and media, including The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Economist. She is the author of the new book, REVEALING: The Underrated Power of Oversharing. A Canadian-born, professionally trained ballet dancer, she now calls Boston her home, where she lives with her husband and two young sons.

Resources Mentioned

Pete Mockaitis
Leslie, welcome!

Leslie John
Hi, thanks for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to chat about oversharing, and could we start at the beginning? Could you make the case for oversharing? I think even the word itself seems like it’s a bad thing, oversharing.

Leslie John
I know, I know it’s off putting, and it’s a cheeky title, my book, The Underrated Power of Oversharing. It’s, “Ooh, la la.” So let me just disarm things right off the bat. There is still such a thing as TMI, as oversharing, and there’s lots of oversharing that is not good.

The point of the cheeky title, and my cheeky point, is to say that, oftentimes, what we think is oversharing is just sharing, and sharing is incredibly helpful for our relationships, for our well-being, and, of course, in the workplace.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So what we think is oversharing could just be sharing. This reminds me, we’ve had guests who’ve said, “What you’re calling micromanaging is really just managing.”

Leslie John
That sounds like rationalization that a control freak would use, but I’m kidding. No, but when I’m teaching my PhD students, it is true, like, to really teach someone, you got to get really micro. So I agree with that.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And so tell us, then, could you maybe orient us with an example of what’s something that some might call oversharing that you think is just great level of sharing?

Leslie John
Well, so here’s something that I shared at work. which was, and I was junior, too. So I was a baby academic, just starting out, and it was a conference, a work conference, and it was late at night, a party, and we were all gathered around, myself, a bunch of junior people, and then two super grand poobah senior people, who we were all desperately trying to impress.

And someone came up with the great idea of saying, “Let’s go around the circle and…” it never ends well, right, “…and share our most embarrassing story ever.” So most people, you know, they started, they’re like, “Oh, you know, like, I worked too hard and, like, one day I got caught working at an odd hour of the day,” or, “Oh, my gosh, there was a typo in this abstract of a fancy academic paper I published. The horror!”

They’re just these, eyeroll-y, like humble brags, right? Like, they’re not actually embarrassing moments, what people were sharing. They were just kind of trying to present themselves in some, there was like a form of posturing, right?

But, for whatever reason, I decided to go for it and share my, actually, most embarrassing story ever, which is also in the book, you’re welcome. But it basically entails me going into grand detail about an episode where I peed myself on stage in the front of, like, a thousand people.

And so I told that story in lots of graphic detail, and people cringed afterwards. And the next morning, I woke up and I’m like, “Oh, my God, I’ve been canceled. That was career suicide. It’s like I poured gasoline all over my body and lit a match, like, the end.” So it really felt like a tremendous overshare TMI moment.

But, thinking back, those two grand poobahs, they became my closest mentors. They opened doors in academia that I didn’t even know existed. And, you know, they’re close, I’m close with them.

And they said, “It’s not, ‘in spite’ of what you shared that night, it’s partly because of it, because you were real and you were actually funny, even if it was at your own expense and you weren’t a robot. And we want to work with people, we’re drawn to people who are actually human and maybe have the humility to joke about themselves.”

I don’t know. I don’t want to flatter myself too much, but that’s an example of something, like, sharing an actual embarrassing story in a work context to people that are way higher status than you. Like, they didn’t even know I existed. That was the first thing they knew about me.

So I think that’s, like, a pretty strong example in the sense of, like, pushing some skepticism that we may actually have about this idea that oversharing is redeeming.

Pete Mockaitis
I think that says it so well, right? Well, I’ve accidentally had an accident as a grown-up as well.

Leslie John
Tell more.

Pete Mockaitis
It was, um, we had a lot of luggage, and a young child, and a long mass transit ride.

Leslie John

Yep, this is a setup. This is, yep.

Pete Mockaitis

And it didn’t seem like I had an opportunity to exit, and so that happened. No one else seemed to notice.

Leslie John

And to be clear, it wasn’t your child.

Pete Mockaitis
No, no, it wasn’t. Okay. So it happens to the best of us. And to your point about we like working with people who are actually human.

Leslie John
Yeah, that’s apt today, right? Whew, yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
I think that says a lot, because I have, even before AI, I remember back in the day when I was on the other side of the career fair for the first couple times, you know? So I was with Bain & Company back at the University of Illinois, trying to get some sharp young associate consultants in the mix.

Leslie John
Yep, fancy schmancy.

Pete Mockaitis

And whenever I heard people say, “Well, hello, I am looking to merge my interests in accounting and finance in a high-impact…” And I was, like, “Are you really? Is that, like, what’s in your heart of hearts, your burning desire?”

Leslie John
Yeah, I love it.

Pete Mockaitis
And so I’d be like, I would much appreciate, even if it feels offensive. I was like, “How on earth are companies paying half a million plus a month for a team of five, young folk like you to do stuff?” I’d be like, “Now that’s a real question.”

And I would find that person memorable and interesting and want to have a closer look at that resume application.

Leslie John
Right. And, in fact, there’s data to support this, too. There’s research on job. I love this example of job interviews because job interviews, you know, it’s easy to say when you’re in a high-status position, everybody loves and respects you. You have a lot more leeway of what you can share often, except for immoral things, which is we’re in a higher-standard category, but setting those aside.

But when you’re junior and you’re being evaluated, and it’s super competitive, like a job interview, even then, it can benefit you from being a little bit more open. Not talking about, like, your rashes or like trauma. Like, not… like a little bit more open. A little bit of authenticity, a little bit of humanity. And that’s a great example.

And so this research study, they got transcripts of people in job interviews, and then they looked at, they analyzed the transcripts, and they looked at what predicted getting the job. And they found that among the people that were qualified, it was the candidates who were real that got the jobs, who answered the question, like, you know, that dreaded and kind of unfair question of, like, “What’s your biggest weakness?” And people are, like, usually, “Oh, I work too hard.”

The ones that answered, and a real weakness, like, or a real perceived weakness like, “You know, sometimes I’m quieter in meetings, that’s because I spend a lot of time listening and processing.” Like, something, “So sometimes I’m misunderstood,” right?

So that kind of answer is what I mean by being a little bit more open in that situation, right? So key, of course, is reading the room and understanding the situation.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, that is a juicy bit of research. Do you have more like that?

Leslie John
Well, in fact, I do have lots of juicy research. I actually insulted the Harvard prof that was interviewing me in my Harvard interview. So that research, when I read it, I’m like, “Oh, redemption, there’s method to my madness.”

Because when I was interviewing, I, inadvertently, sassed the interviewer. I, inadvertently, made a comment about his weight. And so, like, super meanie move. But it’s kind of sassily delivered in the moment.

And, again, one of these, like, my face turned bright red. I’m like, “Oh, my God, they think I’m a horrible person. Why did I do that?” You know, sometimes when I’m nervous, I just blurt things out. It’s a tick or something. I don’t know.

But then three days later, they called me. It was Harvard. And they said, “When you sassed us like that, we thought you’ll fit right in here. Our students are tough, so you got to have the hutzpah.”

So, you know, it easily could have gone the wrong way, but the point is these things are not as risky as we often perceive them to be. And even when there is something negative that comes out of it, like, you know, you’re at a party, you say something a little bit offside, you feel, or like you’re in the workplace and you feel like you insulted someone.

You can always go back to them and say, “Hey, I’m worried about how my comments went over, right?” So it’s not like this one-shot thing that it’s oversharing. And then you can see, even there’s a benefit to that because now, okay, maybe you shouldn’t have said the thing, but now by approaching and talking, now you’re forging a relationship with the person.

The person respects you because you’re asking them questions, you’re hearing them out, you’re learning about each other, right? So it’s, like, even those moments that feel cringe-y and overshare-y, there can be an upside.

And when I was writing the book, it made me reflect on all these funny moments in my life where I thought, “Oh, my God, what did I do?” And looking back, I realized the long game. There was always some amazing redemption to them, so much so that like every single one of these things I would do them all over again.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. Well, so this is eye-opening. And we’ve heard the acronym TMI, too much information. You also introduced the acronym TLI, too little information. How should we be thinking about the concept of TLI?

Leslie John
I think TLI is way more common and way more problematic, actually, than TMI. TLI, too little information, you know, we didn’t even have a word for it. That’s how, like, much we’ve ignored this problem.

It’s not to say TMI isn’t real. For sure, there’s still TMI, but the more I learned and the more I really practiced opening up more, the more I realized, “Wow, this societal fetish with TMI, or the societal, it’s like the greatest social sin, TMI, right?” That’s how we treat it.

But it’s really not the bad, like, of course, sometimes you really can. You can get canceled. You can get fired for telling your boss, “You have a hidden disability,” whatever. All these things. Of course, of course, of course.

But on the whole, in so many circumstances, we hold back when it would benefit us so, so much to open up a little bit more.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So that’s handy to remember. There’s a foil, an alternative set of letters to think about when TMI fears are in our brains. So can you maybe give us some guidelines in terms of, in a way, it’s an art. You can have too little information. You can have too much information.

We might be calibrated a bit too conservatively, and it’d be in our interest to share a bit more and to be a bit more disclosing and revelatory and human. But how do we gauge things and get that dial where we want it to be?

Leslie John
Yeah, great question. So the first, I love where you started in that revealing wisely, figuring out how much to share, what to hold back, how to share it, there’s a lot of science to it, but it’s also an art and I think, most of all, it’s a skill. But, oddly, it’s not a skill we’re, like, taught in school.

My kids just started school. It’s not a skill we’re taught. We’re taught math, arithmetic, but yet, this is really important, figuring out what to share and what not to share, because if we do it well, the rewards are so great.

We get well-being, we get friendships, we get close relationships, we get influence in the workplace, for example, we get respect, admiration, all these things.
So, yes, it’s a skill, and so the first thing to say is that, like any skill, you have to do it to get better at it. You have to practice. And what typically happens is we don’t even open up at all. Like, we don’t even get to practice because we don’t even consider saying the thing.

So we have to start doing it more so that, then, we can learn, like learn by doing. So that’s number one, it’s a skill. And it also means, like, when we do screw up, like have some self-compassion, to get all therapy-y. Have some self-compassion because you’re going to get it wrong because you have to fail to learn how to do it. Okay.

But, in terms of, like, if I was a listener, I’d be like, “Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. But give me the tools, give me the tips.” So what I would say is one really good guide that you can use in any situation almost, the time when I would say it doesn’t apply is in, like, a very close established relationship where kind of these norms of reciprocity fall away, but I digress.

The tip is the principle of reciprocity, which is, essentially, what it sounds like. You want to be aware of, “Is there a back and forth of information exchange? If I start revealing something, is the person, my acquaintance, my colleague, my boss, are they saying something back? Or are they just saying nothing? And am I continuing to go on and on and on?”

You typically don’t want to be in a situation where you’re doing all the sharing and the other person isn’t reciprocating. If they’re not reciprocating, that is information. I mean, unless you’re in a unique context where, like, your boss is interviewing you and asking for feedback or whatever.

But, typically, in a given conversation, you want to follow this principle of reciprocity. And it also means, when someone says something to you, like, I’m thinking you’re on the playground and the kids are playing and they’re happy and they’re smiling, and they say, what I would say is a little reveal.

Usually, in these situations where, like, we make small talk and we just say, “Oh, they’re having so much fun.” But that’s super boring. What would it mean to reveal a little bit more there? What it would mean would be to say something like, “They’re laughing so hard. I don’t even remember the last time I had a big belly laugh.” Like that’s a little reveal, okay?

And so that’s like an olive branch. And then the person I’m with, ideally, they’re going to then share, like, the last time they belly laughed, and then maybe I’ll share some, like, mildly embarrassing story, right?

You see, you want to go back and forth mutually, gradually getting deeper and deeper. So the dynamic of reciprocity is really key. So, anytime, we’ve all been in those situations where, like, you’re on the receiving end, and someone’s just like dumping and dumping and dumping and it’s like dysregulated, you don’t want to do that.

So reciprocity is a principle that you can, like, use and apply tomorrow.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s really handy in terms of you’re offering a little bit at a time instead of all at once and observing the response and seeing, with the reciprocity. And what’s interesting is, sometimes, even then, if you’re not getting much back, that doesn’t necessarily, I’m thinking about my own experience.

I don’t think that necessarily means, “Oh, you’re dead in the water. Don’t share anything with this person.” It could just mean they’re tired, they’re distracted, they’re bored, they’re not that interested in what you had to say with regard to laughter.

And yet, you might very well share more, and it’s totally cool. So I guess my thought is the reciprocity guideline is a handy one, and I’d say, well, you tell me, expert, it’s a fairly safe and conservative one. Does that sound right?

Leslie John
Yeah, that sounds totally right. And, yeah, it’s also a guideline. And like any guideline, sometimes it behooves us to break it. It’s also worth noting that, in that situation where you’re saying something, you reveal something and they don’t say anything back, that’s a moment where we are prone to overreacting where we’re like, “Oh, I said too much.”

Like, we think we attribute it to something we did or said, maybe we said too much. And that is so, like, unless you said something really clearly offensive, it’s usually not the case. It’s informative. You should take note of it.

It could be that they’re tired, it could be that they’re bored, it could be that they don’t want to start another friendship, or, like, all kinds of reasons, and they’re all legitimate. And it, most importantly, gives you information. It’s like, “Okay, maybe they’re not down,” or, “Maybe it’s not interesting. Maybe I’ll ask them a question.”

Like, asking a question is a really good way of, then, if you’re kind of trying to understand and you sense that they’re, maybe, you could bring them into a dialogue with you. So question-asking is another great tool you can use to kind of prompt.

Like, if you say something and you feel like you’re kind of stonewalled, you could ask a question like, “How did you experience that?” or something like this, and see what they say. And if, again, they’re like terse, that’s more evidence.

It’s kind of like we’re amateur scientists going through the world and trying to figure it out. And I think this is to the point that, like, being really cognizant of the situation and how people act and using that to guide our behaviors is really important.

There’s also certain things that people often ask me, “Okay, are there things that are TMI that I should just never share?” Of course, we all know what the taboo topics tend to be, you know, sex, politics, finances, religion.

I wouldn’t say those are off topic, per se, because there’s really a situation for anything, in my view. What I would say is, so it’s really hard to give like topical advice, but what I would say is one, two red flaggy things. One is gossip, especially at the workplace.

So gossip, even though it can be fun and juicy to do, I don’t advise it because it’s not so nice. And it actually makes you look bad. So when you say negative things about other people, people implicitly associate those negative things with you as well. It’s one of these kind of subconscious biases we have.

So it makes you look bad. So don’t gossip. It’s unkind. It’s not your information to share. So that’s one rule of thumb I give.

One of the things that people often ask, “What are things that we tend to undershare?” Like, “Hey, I hear you that you’re saying we should share a little bit more a lot of the time, but what the heck does that mean? How do I do it?”

And one really easy low-hanging fruit way to start is with praise. So think about the things, positive things that come to mind. Like, for me, as a nerdly academic, I’ll be walking down the hall at work and I’ll see a colleague whose paper, academic paper, I just read, and I’ll think, like, “Oh, I love that study. I love the study design. I love the paradigm. Like, yes, I’m a real nerd.”

But we often keep those things to ourselves. But if we say them, so praise, say, “Hey, Josh, I love that paradigm. Mwah! Chef’s kiss.” Like, a specific and sincere piece of praise, that’s a kind of sharing that is very much low-hanging fruit, that we so frequently undershare.

And it’s kind of a one-two punch because, one, the person will feel good. Again, must be specific, must be sincere, right? I’m not talking about vacuous praise. Specific and sincere, they feel good.

Also, you can then start to be strategic, right? Like you can reinforce good behavior as a leader by praise. And it also makes you feel good. Tons of research on this. The giver. It also makes you look good. Again, the same principle with gossip, how saying negative things makes you look bad, saying good things makes you look good.

And then what I have found is that when I’m doing this, applying this, again, because like I’m my own guinea pig in all of this, I have found that it makes me a more positive person. And at the risk of sounding toxically positive, like I am happier because I notice the good things way more often because I’m so in the habit of, like, praising people.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes, and it is just a good feeling in terms of you say something and then they’ll have a response, a reaction, like, “Oh, thank you.” You know, like they were surprised. They weren’t expecting that. There’s some delight and it’s just great. It’s like, “Oh, yeah, that was a nice moment of connection we got to share together and I feel good that I helped someone else feel good and, yay, you know?”

Leslie John
Yay! That’s right. Yay all around.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, you know what’s really interesting about when say praise is, I think it gets to this core emotional resistance here that… because, in a way, like praise doesn’t feel super duper disclosive. Disclosive? Disclosing? In that, in terms of, for me, personally, all I have shared is an opinion and perhaps among the safest of opinions. It’s like, “Hey, this thing you did, I thought was good.”

And yet, there’s still a similar emotional internal sensation going on with resistance to doing a praise versus resistance to sharing a thing. I suppose vulnerability is the approximate English word we’d use. Can you talk about this emotional stuff here?

Leslie John

So I think of vulnerability is, like, kind of it’s really deep sharing. It’s emotional openness. It’s saying, “Oh, I feel really anxious about public speaking. I’m really nervous to give this presentation. My mouth is feeling dry. I’m feeling anxious.” That’s vulnerability.

Most of the time we’re not being vulnerable at work. Sometimes, it behooves us to be vulnerable, but we still need to be very cautious because it is a very risky talking about feelings, negative feelings. Anxieties can be very risky, especially at work, but there’s also huge reward when done the right way.

What I think is a great low-hanging fruit in the workplace is transparency. Transparency is cognitive openness. Transparency is sharing how your mind works, how your thought process works, kind of bringing people under the hood of explaining why you think the way you think, how you came to a certain conclusion.

That’s the kind of revealing that is, really, you get a lot of bang for your buck because it’s relatively safe because you’re not, like, talking about deep, difficult emotions, but you’re opening up because you’re opening up about how your mind works.

So, imagine, for example, your boss comes to you and says, “Hey, I noticed you were really quiet in that meeting,” which I guess is a criticism. And one of the reasons you were quiet is because you’re nervous about speaking up and you don’t know if your ideas are good.

So you could say, you could be vulnerable, and you could say exactly that. I don’t recommend that because that would diminish you, potentially, in the boss’ eyes. But what you could say to them instead, so instead in these situations, we think we either have to do that or just kind of, “Uh, okay, you’re right,” grin and bear it, which also is not great.

Instead, what I’m suggesting is transparency here would be really helpful. If you said something like, “Yes, I realize that and, you know, the way my mind works is I really like to spend time listening and really processing what people are saying. And that’s why I’m a little quiet at first because, then, I have more to contribute when I feel I’ve really processed it. Now, I’m happy to speak off the cuff if you’re telling me you’d like me to get in sooner. That’s great feedback.”

That’s what I mean by being transparent, right? And this is a way where the default, the standard is to just be like, “Okay, boss, yep, you’re right.” That doesn’t really advance you. Saying, “I have anxiety and I don’t think my ideas are good,” that’s dangerous.

But being transparent and saying, “Huh? Well, it’s good observation. The reason why is because I need to process my thoughts,” that actually strengthens you and makes you come across as thoughtful, you know, as mature, and so on.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s a handy distinction there in terms of vulnerability versus transparency. And it seems the key difference there is you’re not sharing the deepest emotional secrets of your inner life, but you are sharing something real and of significance about you and your operations.

Leslie John
Yes, exactly.

Pete Mockaitis

Okay. I’m curious, any other key things you want to be on the lookout for as you’re observing people, their receptivity, their dynamics, their openness? You clued us into checking for reciprocity earlier, which is pretty handy. Are there any other things we should be on the lookout for that could give us some handy indicators?

Leslie John
Well, I think that checking for the feeling of TMI actually is important, or the feeling, or the cues that you’ve crossed the line, you know, which we’re quite exquisitely attuned to. You know the cringe-y face or the averted gaze, shocks even, gasps.

And the reason, I think, we should pay attention to that is not because we should avoid it, but I think we should learn from it. And I think we spend too much time beating ourselves up and feeling ashamed over it when, instead, if you sometimes get there, if you sometimes get that reaction, this may sound crazy, but it’s kind of a cause for celebration because you know you’ve gotten there. You’ve gotten to the limit.

So often, so many of us, we’re in this restricted range of how much we share. We share a very restricted range and I want us to widen up and expand our range.

But if you never experience that, you’re not going too far. And the goal in the end is like, for me, I’m like total emotional intimacy, like with my spouse. I can tell him anything, like that’s the goal. And total guardedness in, say, like a deposition, right? You want the full range. And most of us are kind of stuck in a really small range.

Interestingly, there’s that one analogy is one piece of career advice I got about negotiating, was if you always get what you want in a negotiation, you’re not asking for enough. Sometimes, it’s good to not get what you want because you know you’re pushing it, just like that with revealing. Sometimes, it’s good to feel like you’ve pushed it because then you know where the line is.

Pete Mockaitis
I love that so much. I’ve got a friend who just recently has been, you know, landed two above $50,000 consulting engagements.

Leslie John
Sweet.

Pete Mockaitis
And before, he had never asked for that high a price. And so we’re like, “Oh, great job. Great job.” And it is, it is sort of like eye-opening for him, like, “Whoa! This is possible? I guess this has probably been possible for years, I’ve just never asked. That’s really interesting.” And you see the world.

And I love that you don’t know the boundaries until you hit them, and they may very well be far beyond your world. And when you told that story, it’s like, it’s funny. What came to mind is, and I haven’t thought about this in years, but I was at a gathering. We were on a beach.

I was at a gathering, and we had a lot of college friends. We got together because we were in the same academic minor program. And so we had a lot of classes together back in the day. It’d been years. We all got together. I thought, “We’re all friends here, you know?” Something came up, so I shared a story of a pretty wild, well, supernatural healing miracle, which is, I guess, that’s in our zone, right? Religion?

Leslie John
What? Wow, can you tell it? Everybody wants to know now. Can you tell it? Very meta.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, yeah, a friend and I had a series of visions appear to us, and then we prayed for someone to be healed, and she informed us that she was.

Leslie John
Wow! What was her ailment? Like, what?

Pete Mockaitis
Suicidal depression and self-harm. So it was wild. It was perhaps the coolest thing that’s ever happened to me.

Leslie John
Wow! Wow! That is amazing.

Pete Mockaitis
And so very cool. And so I was just excited to tell the story because it’s something kind of related came up and I thought, “Well, some people don’t want to hear this, but, hey, we’re all friends here.“

And so I went ahead and told the story. And there was, like, it was exactly what you described, and it caught me off guard because people kind of looked away and it was like, “Uh.”

Leslie John
Because are they like, “This is like woo-woo”?

Pete Mockaitis

I guess. I don’t know. It was weird, I thought, “We’re all friends here. What’s going on? We go way back.”

Leslie John
Yeah, I think it’s cool. I have so many follow-up questions.

Pete Mockaitis
“We go way back.”

Leslie John
And I think we don’t know anything. Like, time travel is, like, we do not know the half of it, so.

Pete Mockaitis
Yes. Well, but what was so fascinating, to your point, it’s like the people were looking away. It was like, “I guess maybe I shouldn’t have shared that. Oopsies!” And then I actually got a follow-up text message hours later from one person who was in the group, but she didn’t say anything. She was like, “I really appreciated the story you shared. It meant a lot to me.”

Leslie John
Amazing, yes.

Pete Mockaitis
And it was so fascinating because it’s, like, “I guess I did the wrong thing here. But for her, it was very meaningful. So I guess I didn’t,” but she didn’t say anything and it’s so fascinating, like, what’s under the surface. Yeah.

Leslie John
Right, because it would take so much courage for her in that context. You know, a dear colleague of mine, his name is Amit Goldenberg, and he does work on, like, emotional contagion, and he’s done this fascinating work on how your reaction is anchored to the most negative reaction in the group.

Like, implicitly, we act as if the one negative review is representative, but it’s just that, an outlier. It’s really interesting.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. So it’s really intriguing what can be happening beneath the surface. And I love what you have to say, is you got to bump up against the wall a few times to really know the boundaries because who knows?

Leslie John
Yep, do it. Right. Right.

Pete Mockaitis
Like, if I never shared certain things, I could be, much like our consulting friend, leaving all kinds of money or value or benefit or goodness on the table.

Leslie John

Money on the table. I know. I was thinking the same thing. Totally. Totally. And, you know, I’ve also found it gives me more kind of self-compassion, and also like the right mindset, which is that, “I’m going to fail sometimes. It’s okay.”

And sometimes it’s actually hilarious, the failures, right? Like, it’s less serious than we need it to be, than we often think it is. It’s not this high-stakes zero-something.

Sometimes there are very high-stakes reveals, but the vast majority of the time, it’s very low stakes, which makes it a great place to practice, right? You know, most of our disclosure decisions are pretty low stakes. The accumulation of our lives, it matters, but this is a great way to practice.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that really rings true. And I might suggest, it’s good for us to be humbled a few times just for our own, just so we’re not too, you know, puffed up, chest, annoying, obnoxious, in the course of living our lives and relating to people, as well as, of course, finding the boundaries, the true limits of sharing.

Tell us, Leslie, any other big things you really want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Leslie John
We talked a little bit about how when you’re in a job interview or like you’re not necessarily a manager and it’s a little riskier to open up. But as you kind of move up the ranks, as you become more managerial, more in a leader position, you have a lot more latitude, generally, to be more reveal-y.

And we found that when managers open up a bit more, like say to their teams the things they’re working on, as in weaknesses, like, “I’m working on my organizational skills,” or whatever, it doesn’t occur to managers to share this, but when they do, their employees are far more motivated to work for them.

And bigger picture, the dreamy version of saying this, is that people, when you are in a higher status role, you have a lot of power to change things for better. And the examples I’ll give you there are the heavy-hitter ones of Magic Johnson and Angelina Jolie.

So Magic Johnson, in the early ‘90s, some of us might have like flashbulb memories, some of us may be too young. But, essentially, you can still watch it on YouTube. Magic Johnson suddenly had an announcement to make, everybody was waiting, nobody knew what it was going to be.

Superstar Lakers player comes into the hotel conference room and announces that he’s retiring effective immediately because he has HIV. And, at the time, you know, the early ‘90s, this was like very stigmatized disease. It was “the gay disease,” and there was a lot of stigma that got in the way of, you know, acceptance and compassion and help.

And when he did that, he de-stigmatized it and he motivated people who would, otherwise, not get tested to get tested. There’s lots of studies on how, when after that announcement, the uptick, major upticks in testing.

Similarly, Angelina Jolie, that op-ed she wrote in the Times about 20 years ago, about how she had decided to have a double mastectomy because she has the breast cancer gene. And that, in and of itself, caused many, many, many more people to get screened and detected and to get the preventative care they needed. So it’s really life-changing stuff, it can be.

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah. Yes, thank you. And now can you share a favorite quote, something you find inspiring?

Leslie John
One that I recently encountered that I love, it’s a quote by Dolly Parton, seems very apt, a journalist who, Jad Abumrod, who interviewed her a lot, he said that she told him, “You can ask me anything you want, and I get to answer it however I want.”

Pete Mockaitis
Well said. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Leslie John
So one of mine is this crazy awesome, a crazy thought, seemingly, crazy, I don’t know, a thought experiment where I put people into a dilemma, where I made them make a choice. And the goal of the study was to see just how important it is to open up and just how much we hate people who, or distrust people, who withhold information.

And the idea was to show that, sometimes, it can be better to say, to reveal, even really bad things about yourself relative to opting out of answering, to refusing to share. So what we did in this study was, if you were a participant, I’d give you two prospective dates, two dating profiles.

And imagine one of the dating profiles, the person had been asked, “Have you ever had any STDs?” And the person answered it and said, “Oh, I have had so many STDs, I can’t even count. I’ve made new STDs, I’ve discovered.”  So all the STDs. So, like, super bad.

The other person. I know this is a super weird experiment.

Pete Mockaitis
This will be the clip we use to share for the episode, Leslie.

Leslie John
But there is reason behind the madness. I love my job. Okay, so then the other person, they were asked the same question about their STD history, and they said, “I’m not answering that question. Just not answering.” So who would you rather date? Who would you rather date?

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I saw you deliver this at a keynote, Leslie.

Leslie John
Nice.

Pete Mockaitis
So, you know, both are very concerning.

Leslie John
You wanted that on the record, yes.

Pete Mockaitis
But I guess that’s the thing is you’re forcing me to make a choice. So, I mean, I suppose I’ll take the one who owned it, because, then, at least, I figure, “Okay, we can have a conversation about this.”

Leslie John
“We can work with it,” yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
As opposed to the other one, it’s like, “I guess this is off the table, and it’s probably not good and you were not allowed to talk about it. So I guess I have to pick the one,” yeah.

Leslie John
Yeah. Right. And so that’s what most people pick. First, when we first got that, it was to my astonishment, because I’m like, “Wait, you’d rather someone who is admitting like the worst possible thing relative to someone who’s just like, ‘I’m not answering’?” Like, maybe they’re not answering because, out of principle, that they’re like, “This is a ridiculous question.” We don’t know.

But, yet, that’s not the inference we make. The inference we make is like, “Ooh, we can’t trust them. They’re a hider.” And so we distrust people who hide, who conceal, so much so that we’d rather date someone, we’d rather hire someone, we’d rather be colleagues with someone who admits to things, even if they’re kind of bad, relative to someone who, like, very conspicuously withholds.

And I think that’s because revealing sensitive information, revealing personal information, is a way we show the other person that we trust them. Because it’s like, “I wouldn’t be sharing this if I didn’t trust you. I’m sharing you this because I trust you,” right? That’s what it’s saying, the meta communication, right?

And so when we’re on the receiving end of that, it feels so good that someone has trusted us, and then we trust them back. And that mutual trust is the spark of colleague-ship, friendships, romances, and so on. And so it’s so important that when someone doesn’t do it, we really treat them with contempt when they don’t open up.

Pete Mockaitis
And that’s a really great counterpoint to remember, is that if they happen to already know the answer, we will distrust those who hide. I remember once, I was working, and I happened to know this juicy little piece of gossip that a manager, my manager of the project, was moving in with his girlfriend who also worked at the company.

Leslie John

Ooh, scandal.

Pete Mockaitis
So this was, like, that was happening that weekend. And so, you know, on Monday, we were just chit-chatting, and I was like, “Oh, how was your weekend?”

Leslie John
“How was your weekend?”

Pete Mockaitis
And I was like, “I don’t think he’s going to tell me this,” you know. But he might say, “Oh, moving, you know, it’s rough.” Okay, you know, maybe leave out some of the details.

Leslie John
And say, “Where did you move?”

Pete Mockaitis

But he’s just, like, in less than a quarter of a second after I asked the question, I was like, “Oh, how’s your weekend?” “Had a steak dinner.” It’s, like, “Okay, someone was ready.”

Leslie John
Oh, wow. Shut down. Yeah.

Pete Mockaitis
He was ready to answer the “How was your weekend?” question. And so, I mean, we weren’t pals, we weren’t tight. I didn’t expect him to say, “Well, you know, my girlfriend and I were taking the next step.” I didn’t expect, but I thought he’s like, “Oh, I moved, and it was kind of a pain how moving is.” But because he shared even less than I thought he would, I was, like, I don’t know, I felt more distant from him afterwards.

Leslie John
Yeah, that’s so well put.

Pete Mockaitis 
Okay. And a favorite book?

Leslie John
I am loving, I just finished it, well, there’s one that I’m reading right now, but the one I just finished was Unreasonable Hospitality. It’s so good. I love it.

And then the one I’m really in, I don’t know what’s gotten into me, but I’m really into true crime right now. One of the books I’m into is Broken Plea: The Explosive Search for Truth Behind the Idaho Murders. I don’t know what these preferences say about me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I was just going to recommend The Onion comedy podcast called “A Very Fatal Murder,” which spoofs the whole genre of true crime podcasts.

Leslie John
Oh, I got to listen to that. There was an SNL a couple years ago, one of their music videos that was “Murder show, murder show, I’m going to watch a murder show.” And it was, like, girls’ night in, and they’re getting all excited because they’re going to watch a murder show. So awesome. So true.

Pete Mockaitis
And could you share a favorite tool, something you use to be awesome at your job?

Leslie John
This is such a boring answer, but I’ve recently encountered zeeg, Z-E-E-G. It’s an amazing scheduling tool. It’s way better than Calendly.

Pete Mockaitis
How so?

Leslie John
Well, so to get nerdy about it, you can make it so that your schedule only opens, only lets people book back-to-back. You can have different meeting types that are easy, like, “Days I’m in office versus Zoom” is a different, like it has a little bit more, a lot more flexibility, actually. I’m not really selling it, I’m sorry, but I love it.

Pete Mockaitis
Impressive. And a favorite habit?

Leslie John
Sleep. Is sleep a habit?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, that’s great.

Leslie John
It’s so, so, so important. Like, I know people say it’s important, but, like, I think there’s not many people that actually prioritize it the way it needs to be prioritized. At least, for me, I’m a wreck if I don’t have enough sleep. Like, my emotions I can’t regulate, I can’t think as well.

And so it’s, like, I’m just very…And with that one amazing tool that I love, I look really weird, but blue light blocking glasses. I don’t know that they actually, it might just be placebo, but, like, I swear by them. I got them on at 7:00 o’clock at night.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I mean, Harvard Business Review featured a human random control trial, showing that it got the job done.

Leslie John
Really?

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, better sleep and better performance ratings from colleagues at work.

Leslie John
Oh, wow. Is that new? I haven’t heard this. That’s awesome.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s been around for some years. And is there a key nugget you share that folks seem to really connect and resonate with, they quote back to you often?

Leslie John
Yeah, about my work, one that keeps coming back is to the advice, the guidance. Two things. One, that revealing is a skill. And second is to share a little bit more a lot of the time.

Pete Mockaitis
And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Leslie John
My website ProfLeslieJohn.com, or you can follow me on Instagram or LinkedIn @ProfLeslieJohn.

Pete Mockaitis
And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Leslie John

Praise someone. Give them a specific and sincere piece of praise.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Leslie, thank you.

Leslie John
Thank you so much.

1185: How to Reclaim Your 25th Hour by Getting Out of Your Own Way with Neal Schore

By Podcasts No Comments

Neal Schore shares expert strategies for reclaiming the time we don’t realize we give away.

You’ll Learn

  1. The many ways we waste time without realizing it
  2. The 10-second trick that prevents time-wasting miscommunications
  3. How to feel more powerful in just five seconds

About Neal

Neal Schore serves as chairman and advisor to several notable business leaders, boards, and companies across the United States. He also advises multiple private equity and investment firms on executive leadership and strategic initiatives. He currently serves as cofounder and CEO of The 25th Hour Group, an executive coaching and leadership events firm that showcases his proven leadership toolbox and practice. Previously, Schore served as founder, president, and CEO of Triton Digital, a global technology, data, and services leader in the digital audio and podcast industry. 

Schore received a Bachelor of Arts in business administration, with emphasis on management, marketing, and finance, from Michigan State University. He is currently active in Harvard Business School’s Executive Education Program. Schore is a member of the Los Angeles Gold Southland Chapter of the Young Presidents Organization (YPO) and the recipient of E&Y’s 2011 Entrepreneur of the Year award for greater Los Angeles.

Resources Mentioned

Pete Mockaitis
Neil, welcome.

Neal Schore
Great to be here. Thanks for having me.

Pete Mockaitis
Well, I’m excited to be chatting and find this 25th hour. Could you kick us off with a particularly surprising, fascinating discovery you’ve made to share with us here?

Neal Schore
So many discoveries. I think the most fascinating is that, generally speaking, every one of my clients, and then just people when I ask about their 25th hour, always blame other people for the fact that they don’t have enough time.

So it’s too many meetings, or too many emails, or too many family obligations, or whatever it might be. And what’s fascinating to me is, when I teach them the concept of you manage you, how all of a sudden more time appears.

Pete Mockaitis
It’s funny when you when you mention this, the first thing that comes to mind is I think about my property manager. I’ve got a little apartment in Chicago being rented out. And he said that in his property management experience, it’s amazing how once tenants begin paying for their own electricity and water, their electricity and water bills just plummet.

So I can imagine in these contexts, it’s like, okay, once they’re on the hook for it and there’s some money, some incentives at stake, they just naturally say, “You know, maybe we could shower a little shorter. Maybe, you know, 74 degrees is cool enough this summer.”

So in the universe of time, once you put that in-your-face challenge about, “Hey, you manage you,” where does the extra time appear from in practice?

Neal Schore
So, obviously, you can’t manufacture time, so it’s not actually about extra time. It’s about the time we stop giving away. So what I have developed in my practice over the last 20-some years is exercises and tools that are very practical, lighthearted, easy to implement, relatively easy to understand that brings the control back to you.

So we spend a lot of time and energy and effort trying to control things that we can’t control, out of our control elements, whether it’s people or processes. And when you manage you, no matter what your rank or title is, it is where the time comes from.

So I’ve watched smart, really capable people just erode enormous sums of time. And with this training and the toolbox, they get to just bring that back. So if I had to say it’s simple, it would be it’s not really about extra time, it’s about the time you stop giving away.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. You manage you, stop giving away. Could you share with us a story to paint a picture of all this in action?

Neal Schore
Okay, so I have a client who is petrified of his board.

Neal Schore
So he’s a CEO and he is petrified of his board because he’s got an incredible amount of imposter syndrome. And although he’s the founder of his company and most of the board members of the financial institutions that are supporting him, he just believes that anytime he will get fired.

And so the amount of time and energy that he spends focusing in on not getting fired by over-delivering information, over-emphasizing emails, writes really long emails, what he’ll do in terms of how he manages board meetings, overselling in board meetings, his board wound up growing frustrated with him, not about performance, but about his being long-winded and long in writing. So it backfires.

Now, the emails that he was writing, by how not to get in trouble, so to speak, were taking an enormous amount of time. So, here, he’s spending lots of time crafting and over-communicating, and it’s being poorly received because it’s being viewed as self-serving and non-informative. And so it’s an absolute misfire. So that’s one.

With those modifications, he picked up at least an hour a day. We’re talking about more like 10 hours a week in his board management. With me, I have a great one. It’s a little embarrassing, but I’m free to talk about it. I have freed myself to talk about it.

I’m a young manager. I’m about 25 years old. Most of my staff is about 10 years older than me, way more experienced. And after one of my first team meetings, a woman on the team pulls me aside and says, “Neal, you are really powerful.” And I said, “Thank you?” in a very timid, meek way. And she walked away.

And I spent the next three months, no exaggeration, this is the embarrassing part, trying not to be powerful. So that meant that I was, like, staying late and hanging out with the team members and like back to when I was starting my career, which had only been three years earlier, and like first in, last out, “I’m going to show her I’m not powerful.”

And it was eating me up, I was swirling at night, like the loop just kept playing, wasn’t sleeping well. Finally, I went to her and just said, “Hey, I’d love for you to just explain to me what you meant by powerful.”

And she goes, “Oh, that’s easy. You sit tall in your chair, you’re very approachable, you answer questions very clearly, and you’re always available to help. And I just find that so powerful.”

So, here, she had paid me really like a beautiful compliment, and embarrassingly, I swirled for three months. So had I just paused, figured out her intent, “Is she trying to insult me right now? I don’t think so,” and then just asked that quick, clarifying question, like, “Help me understand what you mean by powerful,” I would have absorbed a compliment and saved myself three months of not being my authentic self.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So there’s our theme. So you manage you because you’re eroding all kinds of time doing things that are not so helpful. And it’s kind of some emotional things at play with regard to doubts and fears that are influencing us to do things that just torch the time.

Neal Schore
Absolutely, consistently, no matter whether you are a young professional or whether you are the CEO and founder, I have not found any exception to the fears that redirect our behavior, the emotional part that you mentioned, away from you managing you. That’s where we try to manage other people.

Like in my case, I wound up trying to be, “Oh, one of the team,” and I was trying to manage them to, in fact, like me, because I didn’t want to be powerful. I viewed the word power as, you know, maniacal or Machiavellian, or I don’t know where exactly my mind wandered, but it was 100% me not managing me.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Well, that sounds like a compelling thesis and opportunity for improvement. We are eroding time, giving it away, because we’re not managing ourselves optimally, but rather we’re letting fears, doubts, emotional things manage us. So, Neal, what is to be done?

Neal Schore

So I’m very metaphorical in the way that I teach, and, certainly, in the book, there are a lot of examples and stories and illustrations and metaphors. So what’s to be done?

Well, our robots, and this is the metaphorical robot each of us have, are programmed young to build sequences. In my view, it starts in kindergarten. We go to lunch at 11:37. In my case, I had three varieties of lunch, came in the same lunch box that I carried every single day.

I lined up for recess at 12:02. You came back in from recess at 12:27. It was just very methodical. And that is a representation of how we start our careers and enter the workforce, and then it becomes a sequence of analyst, and then associate, and then director and then principal. And no matter what the titling nomenclature is, there’s a sequence to getting promoted.

And what I like to say is our robots need to be reprogrammed. We have to break sequences. And it’s really uncomfortable to do because it is so amazingly preset or programmed. And so I start people with silly exercises, like, what I call the pant-leg challenge. So what pant-leg do you put on first? Are you a lefty-righty or a righty-lefty?

Pete Mockaitis
I think I have a sequence of not paying enough attention, and rather just thinking about other things or how I better hurry up and get out the door.

Neal Schore
Exactly.

Pete Mockaitis
But, as you say it and I imagine, I think right first.

Neal Schore
Okay, so you’re a righty-lefty. And as you just very properly described, very few of us, in fact, I’ve done this with thousands of people, are focused in on what pant-leg we put on first. We just put on our pants. And our minds are somewhere else, or we’re contemplating whatever it is that we are doing as we are getting dressed.

When I have people change their pant-leg, so you’re righty-lefty, for the next 30 days, you are now a lefty-righty. So that means that when you go to put on your pants, you have to pause, actually stop and think, and put your pant leg on lefty-righty. Or, if you go in your robot sequence, you have to take your pants off and put them back on.

And what winds up happening, and again, I acknowledge this sounds silly on the surface, but what winds up happening is we realize, through an exercise like this, the pant-leg challenge, how programmed we are when it comes to things like our participation in meetings, the length of meetings, the way we call meetings, who attends meetings, and how many accommodations we make around that.

So someone walks into the meeting and they start talking with a colleague about their weekend, and there’s 10 people in the room, and two people are talking, and everyone else is just sitting around waiting for them to finish a conversation.

Very few people are going to say, “Hey, this meeting was called for 11:00 a.m. We’re starting at 11:00 a.m.” It starts at 11:05 or 11:07 or 11:10. And that erosion of even five, seven, 10 minutes multiplied by 10 people in the room, multiplied by the amount of meetings that you have in a day is hours of erosion.

And so when you start to, then, calculate and do things differently, the meeting starts at 11:00, I always teach people to end meetings at least 10% early. So if you wind up having 10 people in a 30-minute meeting that winds up going 27 minutes instead of 30, everyone gets back three minutes. Three minutes is a lot of time to run to the restroom, get a snack, you know, feed the dog, just walk outside for a second.

Pete Mockaitis
Start the next load of laundry.

Neal Schore
Right, start a load of laundry, whatever you want to do, enormous amount of time. And we don’t worry about whether someone is late, or whether they’re not, everyone is adults, and you just start breaking these sequences and the patterns that the company, any company, has been following, and it’s, again, a game-changer.

Then I teach people to take 50% of their meetings, and, excuse me, 75% of their meetings, and make them 50% shorter. So a 30-minute meeting can be done in 15 minutes. And when you take 10 people in that meeting and it’s done in 15 minutes, not only is everyone thrilled, you’re like, “Hallelujah! I just got 15 minutes back to my day,” but that’s 150 minutes of productivity in a company off of one meeting.

And everyone is happier. And you do that by having a very clear agenda. You don’t let anyone derail it. You start, you stop, you go. And there’s tools in the book that I teach about checking in and using professional vulnerability, but also about how to meeting management, a critical part of time loss.

And then people walk out happy, which spreads positive contagious, as opposed to people walking out with the ughs. Ughs is like, “Ugh, I can’t believe I had to sit in that meeting,” or, “I can’t believe I have to go to my next one,” and “Ugh, I can’t stand listening to this guy,” whatever it might be. Everyone gets the ughs, which is a massive time-crusher.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So we’re breaking the robot sequences and, particularly, with regard to meetings, I guess what I’m hearing is to thoughtfully assess and assert ourselves in order to not just erode the time.

So, like, “Let’s start the meeting on time. Hey, do we really need to have all these people in this meeting? Do we really need to have it this full length? Let’s shoot for 10% earlier.” So it’s like the robot sequence is a bit of a lazy or thoughtless autopilot that just goes with the flow and time slips away in the process.

Neal Schore
Absolutely. So if we put this in the more practical sphere, step one is to get comfortable being uncomfortable and to do things differently. And then when we put this in a more practical sphere, my favorite story, which I highlight in the book, is around a company that I started working with as they were in the rapid growth stage.

When they started the company, it was eight to ten of them, and they did a morning stand-up every day. I believe it was 8:15 in the morning. And so as they started to grow and they had hundreds of employees, they kept the morning stand-up at 8:15 in the morning.

So everyone arrived in the office around 8:10 to go to the morning stand-up at 8:15. And the office space expanded, of course, but the routine of the meeting was incredibly robotic, what they shared, how they shared it, even then having to start to use a microphone in order to amplify and get the message out. And it lasted about 45 minutes or so, 45 minutes, sometimes an hour.

So every single person, hundreds of people in the company’s day was built around the morning stand-up. Well, we moved it from an everyday meeting to a once-a-week meeting. And the once-a-week meeting rotated every five weeks. So Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. And then, ultimately, we eliminated Friday, so it was four days.

And we wound up building an agenda around the meeting because not every data point that was being shared was applicable. So when you then do the math and you calculate the amount of time saved by not having everyone attend, reducing the meeting to once a week, it was 15,000 hours of productivity redeposited back to the company.

When we looked at the staffing plan of the company, it wound up being a massive reduction in future hires required simply by changing the morning stand-up. And there was no loss of information because so much of the information was just in this rhythm, “And every morning we talk about this and this and this,” which with eight people it works. With hundreds of people, it doesn’t.

And so breaking that sequence wound up, again, over 15,000 hours of productivity back. not only enhanced the bottom line, but people started to come in at 7:00 a. m. So you started this measure and see, instead of rolling in at 8:00 to be an 8:15 stand-up, people actually worked more hours as well.

So people got there at 7:00, it was preferred. Sometimes they left closer to 4:00 o’clock. Other people there, 7:00, 8:00 o’clock at night. So this punch-the-clock mentality that was developed by this morning stand-up completely changed the culture of this company.

Pete Mockaitis
Nifty. All right. So understood. We’ll thoughtfully take a look at our robot sequences, break them up, see what happens, get more comfortable being uncomfortable. I’d like to zero in some more on this emotional stuff: imposter syndrome, fears, doubts. What are some of your other favorite moves for dealing with these emotional matters?

Neal Schore

So one of the most practical is pausing, then figuring out what the intent of the situation is, and then asking clarifying questions. So it’s like a very quick, rapid fire, in your head, you manage you, where someone is saying something, and then you’re figuring out, “What are they actually trying to ask here?”

Or, “Do they really need my help or do they just want attention from me?” Or, “Why is it that they’re confused?” So we solve for it. Sometimes it’s very much on the surface, “Yeah, I just didn’t clarify it well, or they need some more information.” And then just ask clarifying questions.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. So this is in our interpersonal matters. Rather than stew and try to read the tea leaves of what they might have meant by such a thing, to, in fact, pause and simply ask.

Neal Schore

Correct. Pause, simply ask. Sometimes it’s just about buying a little time, asking and just getting a little bit of time to figure out the intent. But when trained in this, it becomes, you know, within three to 10 seconds, it becomes a very rhythmic way that we save ourselves a lot of time by not getting distracted, by not understanding the intent.

Pete Mockaitis
Okay. And when we are all by our lonesome selves, anything we can do to help us get a handle on this fear, doubt, and imposter syndrome stuff?

Neal Schore
So one of the things, one of the tools that I have developed, I call cookies. So cookies came from the eight-year-old version of myself, where in my household, my mom ran a tough kitchen. You did not get dessert before dinner. Period.

And one time, my sister snuck me a pack of Chips Ahoy at 5:00 o’clock before dinner, and it was like a euphoric feeling. I won the cookie lottery. You can’t even describe it. I literally remember vividly, like being at dinner that night, like I beat the system. It was incredible.

And I remember, because it was so euphoric, the idea of giving cookies, that affirmation to employees is really important, but receiving it is also critically important. And the higher we get in organizations, the less cookies or affirmation we receive.

So a CEO of a company, very, very, very few cookies. Like, very few people walking up to me as the CEO of my company and saying, “Neal, you crushed it in that meeting,” or, “Great job in that presentation today,” or, “You did a wonderful job with that client.” It doesn’t happen.

When we, on the other hand, as a CEO, it is very important for me to provide that affirmation and those cookies. So I teach people to, in you manage you, to give themselves their cookies.

And so it would be like this. You could say to yourself after this podcast, “I asked great questions today. I am so happy that I found Neal to bring on as a guest to the show. I am thrilled with the way that everything is going.” It could be any of that. It takes about five seconds to do. And when we learn to give ourselves that nutrition, we become less dependent and needy on other people.

So even as the CEO, we don’t get a lot of affirmation. We get very little, in fact. However, we’re humans. We need it. And so learning how to provide ourselves that affirmation, I call the, you know, sticking with the theme of cookies, that nutrition, it’s great.

And the more cookies we provide ourselves, the more enhancements we allow to reduce that noise for the next test or the next presentation or the next meeting, whatever it may be.

Pete Mockaitis
I like that a lot. And when you give yourself these cookies, are there any best practices? I’m thinking about, Ethan Kross, who wrote the book Chatter, was a guest of the show, mentioned that using your name in the third person can have some distancing effects, providing a different perspective and can reduce rumination.

And his example, like LeBron James has got to do what’s best for LeBron James, is the example he used. And so in this instance, it’s almost like, I’m guessing, we might want to do the opposite in terms of, like, your front and center, like, “Pete, you were very effective in that interview,” or whatever, I don’t know, “Hey, look in the mirror. Give yourself a hug.”

I don’t know, Neal, you tell me. What is the best practice for making these cookies as hot and tasty and wonderful as possible?

Neal Schore
I love it. You literally nailed it. So one of the other things that I teach people is to get comfortable being uncomfortable. And there’s a wildly uncomfortable component to talking to yourself and looking at yourself. And so that’s exactly what I have people do.

So you have to go to a mirror or some sort of reflective device. It could be an elevator in a building, you know, going up or down in an elevator, whatever it may be, preferably with no one around because it’s a personal thing and talking to yourself could wind up putting your business in other people’s business.

And so the other thing is when you’re online, if you’re using Teams or Zoomers or whatever your device is, when you hang up from a meeting, when I hang up from a meeting, it is me staring at me.

And so I spend a lot of time on video with my clients every single week. So when I’ve had a particularly impactful session, instead of immediately flipping my computer down, I have them exit the meeting, the virtual meeting room, and I’m eyeball to eyeball looking at myself.

And I’m like, “Neal, you crushed it. The way you explained that today was exceptionally good. Nice work.” And no one’s hearing me. I’m in a private setting. I am looking at myself, which is very uncomfortable to start with, and I’m providing myself that affirmation, which not only provides the cookies or that nutrition, but it’s also very energizing, right?

No different than when someone pays another person a compliment, there’s a boost that the other person gets. And so, again, as you get higher in a company and you go through the ranks in the org chart, we receive less, although the humanity and our needs don’t change. And so, therefore, you manage you works incredibly well in that case.

Pete Mockaitis
And even if you’re low in the company, if you just have a manager who doesn’t share, you know, supportive encouragement very often, you go for it. I think that’s swell.

Neal Schore

It’s a great point. I was with a young professional just yesterday who’s one of our clients that is drowning in “I hate my job,” and very generationally apropos, “And I get absolutely no credit for the work I do.” And the conversation is like, “Well, why do you need credit from someone else for the work you do?”

And then we go through a series of questions that get, I go through a series of questions that gets that person to the other end of it, which winds up going, “Yeah, I can manage myself.” And so that is in the simplest form, but it’s very applicable there as well.

Pete Mockaitis
That’s good. You know, I chuckle, I’m imagining the Fathom AI meeting Notetaker capturing that as a summary bullet at the end of the meeting, “And Neal congratulates himself for being awesome.”

Neal Schore
There’s no doubt about it that that has happened, and it is very funny. I wound up forwarding notes from a meeting. It’s very funny. This happened just last week. Forwarding notes from a meeting where I didn’t pay attention to the AI Notetaker. And I had a moment of cookie.

And one of our team members who was looking at it, was like, “Great cookie you gave yourself.” And I was like, “Oh, that’s a little embarrassing? But not really.”

Pete Mockaitis
Yeah, cool. Well, Neal, tell me, anything else you want to make sure to mention before we hear about some of your favorite things?

Neal Schore
Well, I would say that the applicability of the toolbox and the book is there from, again, young professional, even students through retirement. It is also professionally-oriented and in the book, you learn so many tools. One of my absolute favorites, I call “It’s my fault.” It winds up being, again, a game-changer for people who naturally respond defensively, which is about almost all of us, and so many great things there.

Pete Mockaitis
“It’s my fault.” Can you tell us what’s that about?

Neal Schore
Your neighbor’s garbage can fell over, it was your fault, or there’s traffic on the freeway, it’s your fault. And people get very, “How is that possible?” and that’s part of the teachings. And then when you accept the word fault as not being like a dirty, nasty, ugly word, which it really is, like blame, default, it is, and we do things differently, and we just change that defensive setting that we’re all programmed in, it winds up saving not only a lot of time, but we just live happier.

Pete Mockaitis
“It’s my fault. It’s my fault. It’s my own grievous fault.”

Neal Schore
There it is.

Pete Mockaitis
How about a favorite quote?

Neal Schore
Build your people who build your business.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite study or experiment or bit of research?

Neal Schore
So it’s David Brooks, who’s an author, has a management philosophy around great managers make people feel seen. And there is research around that that he quotes in his book that I find so compelling about employees not needing job descriptions, and learning is really a big part of the motivation system, and experiences are what drive it. And there’s data in there that support all those points. And it is philosophically very much in line with what I believe.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite book?

Neal Schore
One of my favorite books is From Strength to Strength, and the other one is Tuesdays with Morrie, Mitch Albom.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And a favorite tool?

Neal Schore
My favorite tool is firing your devil.

Pete Mockaitis
How do we do that?

Neal Schore
So you fire your devil. Your devil is that metaphorical devil and angel sit on our shoulders, the devil becomes the governor, activates all of our fear systems, becomes the narrator of all those things that cost us enormous sums of time and feed the swirling.

And when we fire our devil, which literally is an exercise where we have a conversation with our devil-self, that version of us that’s that devil, and we’re like, “You’re out of here. You are not welcome here anymore. I am kicking you out. Turn in your keys. Turn in your computer.”

And there’s a whole exercise that I take people through so that when the swirls start, we have the concepts of, “Oh, wait a second. The devil is no longer around.” And then the angel gets to come back and take over the governing of that moment. It saves a lot of time and it winds up bringing that levity or that fun tone to what I teach in my practice.

Pete Mockaitis

All right. And a favorite habit?

Neal Schore

Favorite habit is exercise. So I am really good about trying to do something every day. So I am not maniacal about it where I have to have it, but I’m mindful about it and I feel better being in the habit of doing something physical or exercise-oriented every day.

Pete Mockaitis

And is there a key nugget you share that really seems to connect and resonate with folks, they quote it back to you often?

Neal Schore

So one of the tools that I teach is around the line of mediocrity. So the concept is, this is the line of mediocrity. It’s just a straight line. And just below the line is mediocre. And just above the line is good. And up here, straight to the right, is exceptional.

And every day, we have moments where we are mediocre, we have moments where we are good, and we have moments of exceptional. We are trained to be mediocre. We learn to be good and we strive to be exceptional.

And what I hear religiously from clients and people that I’ve been in discussions around the book and otherwise is how mediocre, again, a word that isn’t necessarily pleasant, but we bring that lighter tone to it, saves a ton of time and energy where you just go, “Oh, I was just mediocre,” and you have fun with it. And then we fix it and strive for our exceptional.

So leadership is hard. We just recognize mediocre and strive for exceptional.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And if folks want to learn more or get in touch, where would you point them?

Neal Schore
Well, they can go to NealSchore.com. It’s N-E-A-L-S-C-H-O-R-E.com, or 25HourGroup.com, and there’s links to the book there and all kinds of different exercises and learnings and teachings on the websites as well.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. And do you have a final challenge or call to action for folks looking to be awesome at their jobs?

Neal Schore

My final call to action is break the sequence. Do not do things tomorrow the same way you did today. You will get comfortable in your uncomfortable, I promise you. And to just shake it up. You’re going to see a whole new world.

Pete Mockaitis
All right. Neal, thank you.

Neal Schore
Thank you so much.